Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of narLink to Publisher's site
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 January; 39(1): e1.
Published online 2010 October 8. doi:  10.1093/nar/gkq868
PMCID: PMC3017619

Strict control of transgene expression in a mouse model for sensitive biological applications based on RMCE compatible ES cells


Recombinant mouse strains that harbor tightly controlled transgene expression proved to be indispensible tools to elucidate gene function. Different strategies have been employed to achieve controlled induction of the transgene. However, many models are accompanied by a considerable level of basal expression in the non-induced state. Thereby, applications that request tight control of transgene expression, such as the expression of toxic genes and the investigation of immune response to neo antigens are excluded. We developed a new Cre/loxP-based strategy to achieve strict control of transgene expression. This strategy was combined with RMCE (recombinase mediated cassette exchange) that facilitates the targeting of genes into a tagged site in ES cells. The tightness of regulation was confirmed using luciferase as a reporter. The transgene was induced upon breeding these mice to effector animals harboring either the ubiquitous (ROSA26) or liver-specific (Albumin) expression of CreERT2, and subsequent feeding with Tamoxifen. Making use of RMCE, luciferase was replaced by Ovalbumin antigen. Mice generated from these ES cells were mated with mice expressing liver-specific CreERT2. The transgenic mice were examined for the establishment of an immune response. They were fully competent to establish an immune response upon hepatocyte specific OVA antigen expression as indicated by a massive liver damage upon Tamoxifen treatment and did not show OVA tolerance. Together, this proves that this strategy supports strict control of transgenes that is even compatible with highly sensitive biological readouts.


The ability to switch genes ‘on’ or ‘off’ in a particular tissue in the mouse at any defined time point is a powerful tool to investigate mammalian gene function in development, disease and various physiological processes. Currently, the regulated expression of transgenes has been achieved by two different methods, i.e. reversible transcriptional control employing regulated promoters and irreversible genetic control by the use of site-specific recombinases [reviewed in (1–5)]. Transcriptional systems have been established, in particular, employing the Tetracycline (tet) system to control transgene expression in mammalian cell culture (6–8) as well as in mice (9–11). According to the design of the expression modules, both gradual expression and stochastic, i.e. bimodal expression can be achieved (12).

A different mode of regulation is provided by genetic switches based on recombinases such as Cre or Flp. Most commonly for conditional gene activation, the specific gene to be switched on is usually separated from the promoter by a ‘STOP’ cassette that prevents the transcription and translation of the target gene. This ‘STOP’ cassette is in turn flanked by directly oriented loxP sites (13–18). The ‘STOP’ cassette usually comprises of single or multiple polyadenylation signal(s). Upon excision of the STOP cassette via Cre, the target gene is activated. An efficient method to achieve temporal regulation of Cre-mediated recombination is by fusing the Cre ORF to the mutated ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human estrogen receptor (CreERT). Currently, several steroid regulated forms of CreERT recombinases are available (19–23) that can be activated by the synthetic ligand Tamoxifen (Tam).

While a plethora of transgenic systems for various biological applications could be generated, questions that require extremely tight control of transgenes in transgenic mice were not yet addressed. In particular, immune activation studies have been shown to be compromised by ‘leaky’, unregulated gene expression as e.g. revealed by successful DNA immunization even with non-induced expression cassettes (24). In transgenic mice, unintended basal antigen expression during embryonic development would result in tolerance since the antigen will be recognized as an endogenous (‘self’) antigen. Accordingly, even though disease models do exist that employ the above mentioned controlled tissue-specific gene regulation systems (25,26), their application toward immune activation studies was not yet evaluated.

We developed a mouse model that shows strict regulation of any transgene. We employed Cre-mediated inversion of the transgene rendering it under the control of the ubiquitously active ROSA26 promoter. Breeding with mice providing ubiquitously expressed or liver-specifically expressed CreERT2 allows activation of antigens by Tam at any time. The transgene cassette was introduced into the ROSA26 locus in a way that supports its exchange by recombinase mediated cassette exchange (RMCE), thereby providing a highly flexible approach for inducible transgene expression of choice. Here, we report the results from two transgenes, luciferase and Ovalbumin, and evaluate the strategy as a model for induced hepatitis.


ROSA26 tagging plasmid and RMCE exchange vector construction

To create a platform ES cell line for RMCE-based ROSA26 targeting, we established a tagging vector based on pROSA26-1 (17) harboring the homology arms of the ROSA26 locus and additionally comprising the following components (i) adenoviral splice acceptor site (SA); (ii) non-interacting FRT sites (wild-type FRT, shown as F in the figure and the mutant F5 site (27), respectively, flanking; (iii) an inverted luciferase (LUC) cassette flanked by inverted loxP sites followed by a puromycin N-acetyltransferase (PAC) gene; and (iv) a promoter and start-codon deficient neomycin phosphotransferase gene (Δ Neo). The design of the cassette upon homologous recombination in the ROSA26 locus is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1.
Strategy to create a platform ES cell line for RMCE-based ROSA26 targeting. (A) Strategy to make ubiquitously expressed ROSA26 locus RMCE accessible. Structure of the wild-type ROSA26 locus, the tagging vector harboring the heterospecific FRT sites and ...

The RMCE exchange vectors are based on pEMTAR (28) and harbor a multiple cloning site followed by the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) element with a translational ATG start codon positioned in frame with the non-interacting FRT and the mutant F5 site, respectively.

In all ES cells evaluated in this study, the transgene of interest (Cre-activatable Ovalbumin or luciferase gene) was integrated in antisense and flanked by oppositely oriented wild-type loxP sites. The OVA coding sequence gives rise to a fusion protein comprising of three components (i) hsp 73-capturing N-terminal viral J domain of SV40 T-Ag (cT77); (ii) 108-residue of the Ovalbumin fragment (aa 246–353 with a isoleucine to valine change at position 258) with well-characterized Kb- and Ad/b-binding epitopes (specifically recognized by OT-I or OT-II/D011 TCR) and (iii) the eGFP reporter (Schirmbeck, R., unpublished data).

Vector sequences and maps are available on request.

Cell culture

IB10 murine embryonic stem cells (mES) cells (subclone of E14 ES cell line) (29) were cultured on feeder cells [mitotically inactivated murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF)] and maintained in DMEM+GlutaMAX-I (Gibco) supplemented with 15% fetal calf serum (heat inactivated: 30min at 56°C), penicillin (10 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), 1 mM non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 1mM sodium–pyruvate (Gibco), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol and in the presence of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). The cells were kept at 37°C and 7% CO2 in humidifying incubators.

In vitro differentiation of ROSALUC mES cells

A total of 1 × 106 ROSALUC mES cells were seeded in 15ml DMEM medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin (10 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), 2mM l-glutamine in bacterial dishes. Suspension culture in bacterial dishes, in the absence of feeders and LIF for 5–7 days led to the formation of embryoid bodies. Embryoid bodies were centrifuged (500 rpm, 5 min) and plated on gelatinized 10 cm cell-culture dishes so that they could adhere and form outgrowths of differentiated cells. After 4–5 days, the cells were dissociated by trypsin EDTA (TEP) (Sigma) and split on to gelatinized six wells. Accordingly, samples were then harvested for subsequent analysis of luciferase activity.

Modification of mES cells

Homologous recombination of ROSA26 locus with the tagging vector

A total of 4 × 106 mES cells were harvested with TEP, centrifuged (1000 rpm, 5 min) and the cell pellet was washed once with PBS to remove any residual culture medium. For electroporation with the Gene Pulser (Biorad) cells were re-suspended in 1 ml Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and 10 µg of the purified, XhoI linearized plasmid DNA was added. Electroporation was performed at 240 V and 475 µF capacitance (time constant = 10.2). After electroporation, the cell suspension was transferred to pre-warmed culture medium, seeded onto feeder coated 10cm cell-culture dishes and allowed to recover. After 48 h, puromycin was added at a concentration of 1 µg/ml to select the cells.


All the targeting experiments in ROSALUC mES cells based on Flp mediated cassette exchange were performed using LipofectamineTM 2000 (Invitrogen). For this purpose, 80–90% confluent ROSALUC mES cells seeded on gelatinized six-well dishes were co-transfected with the circular exchange vector and the Flp recombinase expression vector pFlpe (30) (usually at a DNA concentration ratio of 1:3 or 1:1 respectively) along with 10 µl of the LipofectamineTM 2000 reagent as per the manufacturer’s instructions. After 48 h the transfected ES cells were transferred to feeder coated 10 cm cell-culture dishes and selection pressure with G418 at a concentration of 0.4 mg/ml was applied. As a negative control, ROSALUC mES cells transfected with only the Flp recombinase expression plasmid was always included. Selection was usually carried out for 8–10 days during which it was ascertained that all the cells in the negative control were killed. Putative RMCE targeted G418 resistant subclones obtained were then picked and cultured in medium containing G418.

Stable transfection of ROSALUC mES cells with Cre expression vector

ROSALUC mES cells were stably transfected with a Cre recombinase expression vector, pPGKcrebpA (31) using the LipofectamineTM 2000 (Invitrogene). For this purpose, 1 × 105 ROSALUC ES cells seeded on gelatinized six-well dishes were co-transfected with 3 µg of circular pPGKcrebpA and 1 µg of circular pSBC2neo (for conferring G418 resistance) along with 10 µl of the Lipofectamine reagent as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Treatment and selection of the transfected cells was then performed as described earlier.

Luciferase detection

Cells were harvested from six-well plates and the cell pellet was re-suspended in 50 µl Tris–HCl (pH 7.6). The cell suspension was subjected to repeated freeze-and-thaw cycles (4×) in liquid nitrogen and a 37°C water bath, respectively. After centrifugation (15 000 rpm, 20 min, 4°C) the protein supernatant was used for the luciferase and BCA assays. To detect luciferase activity in the different mouse tissues, the mouse was sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the chosen organs were isolated and frozen in liquid nitrogen. For preparation of lysates, the frozen organs were quickly wrapped in alu-foil and crushed in liquid nitrogen using a chilled mortar and pestle. The powdered tissue was then immediately transferred to a douncer, followed by addition of 400 µl Tris–HCl (pH 7.6) and further homogenized. The homogenized tissue was then subjected to the freeze-thaw cycles and subsequently protein lysates were obtained as described earlier.

An amount of 10µl of the protein lysate was then added to 400 µl of reaction buffer (1:5 ATP solution of 5mM ATP in ddH2O, pH 7.5, luciferase buffer containing 25 mM glycylglycine, 15 mM MgSO4 in ddH2O, pH 7.8) in a suitable tube and emitted light was measured with a Lumat LB9507 (Berthold) Luminometer after automatic injection of 50 µl luciferin solution containing 0.1 mM synthetic d-luciferin (Promega), 25 mM glycylglycine in ddH2O, pH 7.8 (measurement period: 10 s). Luciferase activity was measured in relative light units (RLU). The RLU were normalized to total amount of proteins present in the cell lysate using the BCA assay (32). Moreover, in case of quantitative luciferase detection in the individual organs, luciferase activity of >15 RLU/µg of total protein was considered as real expression.

Standard luciferase assay for absolute determination of luciferase molecules per cell

In order to correlate the luciferase activity to the number of luciferase molecules/cell a luciferase standard using the QuantiLum Luciferase enzyme (Promega) was performed. This QuantiLum Luciferase enzyme was used to generate a Standard Curve. The kinetics of QuantiLum Luciferase and the luciferase gene in ROSALUC are the same and therefore on a theoretical basis, it could be used to estimate the amount of luciferase molecules cell lysates.

The QuantiLum Luciferase enzyme was serially diluted in 1× luciferase buffer (containing 1 mg/ml BSA) to known quantities and corresponding RLU were measured to generate a Standard Curve (duplicates were set up for each serial dilution). This standard curve was then used to further calculate the molecules of luciferase present in the given cell lysates.

Transgenic mice

Transgenic mice were generated by blastocyst injection. ROSAConL mice were obtained from ROSALUC male mice upon breeding to K14Cre female (33) in which Cre is constitutively expressed in oocytes and keratinocytes. Cre deficient mice which show permanent reversion of the luciferase were identified and backcrossed to Balb/c to establish ROSAConL line.

All mice were bred and kept under standard pathogen free conditions in the animal facility at the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig (HZI). Animal experiments were conducted either at HZI or at the University of Ulm according to the guidelines of the German Animal Welfare Law.

Tamoxifen administration to the mice

Mice were orally administered with Tamoxifen by gavage using a special feeding needle (Heiland Vet Gmbh). Tamoxifen tablets (RatioPharm, 30 mg/ml) were dissolved in Clinoleic infusion solution (conc of 20 mg/ml). An amount of 5–8 mg of Tamoxifen was administered orally for 4 days with feeding every alternate day. Mice were sacrificed 5–7 days after the last feed.

In vivo bioluminescence imaging using the Xenogen IVIS 200

Mice expressing the reporter gene, luciferase, were analyzed using the Xenogen IVIS 200 imaging system. For analyzing mice using this imaging technology, the mice were first anaesthetized in a special induction chamber with 2–2.5% isoflurane (Abbot). Upon intra-peritoneal (i.p) injection with 100µl of luciferin (30mg/ml in PBS, Synchem OHG) the mice were placed in the acquisition chamber equipped with a charge coupled device (CCD) imaging camera. All the images acquired were analyzed using the Living Image 2.60.1 (Igor. Pro 4.09A) software.

Isolation of hepatocytes and coculture with OT-I CD8 T cells

Hepatocytes were isolated as described earlier (34). In brief, the liver was perfused and digested, removed and gently pressed through a mesh. The parenchymal cells were separated from the non-parenchymal cells by centrifugation (500 rpm, 5 min). CD8+ T cells were purified from spleen of TCR transgenic OT-I B6 mice using the CD8+ T-cell MACS isolation kit (catalogue No. 130-090-859; Miltenyi Biotec). A total of 1 × 105 purified CD8+ T cells were cocultured in 200 µl flat-bottom microwells with 1 × 104 hepatocytes. Supernatants were collected from these cocultures at the indicated time-point. IFN-γ were detected in the supernatants by conventional enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described earlier (34).

Detection of alanine aminotransferase activity

Blood from the retro-orbital sinus of mice was collected in tubes containing anticoagulant (Heparin). The tubes were centrifuged (10 000rpm, 10min) and resulting plasma was used for detecting alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity. ALT activity was determined using the Reflotron® test (; Roche, Mannheim, Germany).


Thin slices of liver tissue (<4mm) were fixed in 4% formalin (pH 7.4) for 24 h and subsequently embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections, 3µm thick were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).


Strategy to obtain strictly controlled expression of gene of interest

We constructed a Cre dependent cassette for regulated luciferase expression. This cassette was targeted into the ROSA26 locus by homologous recombination (ROSALUC in Figure 1A). To facilitate re-engineering of this locus in ES cells, the cassette was flanked with FRT sites and a non-functional neomycin resistance gene according to a strategy previously shown to be highly efficient for various cell lines (28,35,36). Flp mediated targeting of FRT tagged loci is achieved upon transfection with vectors carrying corresponding FRT sites and a cassette that activates the neomycin resistance gene according to Figure 1B and C. To evaluate the efficiency of RMCE in these cells various expression cassettes encoding different transgenes and promoters were introduced into the targeting vector pEMTAR (28) and employed for RMCE. As shown in Figure 2, targeting of the ROSALUC ES cells proved to be efficient and highly specific with all tested vectors. Three of the targeted cells were employed to establish transgenic mice and proved to be germ-line competent. Together, ROSALUC cells represent a platform that allows subsequent efficient exchange for cassettes and transgenes of interest and rapid generation of transgenic mice.

Figure 2.
Targeted integration of different antigen/gene cassettes into the parental FRT tagged ROSALUC mES cells via RMCE. The above figure gives a summary of the efficiency of integrating different targeting constructs into the tagged ROSA26 locus by Flp-mediated ...

In ROSALUC, the luciferase gene was placed in the reverse orientation with respect to ROSA26 transcription and flanked by loxP sites oppositely oriented to each other. Cell lysates obtained from targeted ROSALUC mES cells as well as from in vitro differentiated cell populations generated thereof were tested for basal luciferase expression. As shown in Table 1, without Cre, luciferase expression of 68 and 23 RLU/µg of total protein was observed in ROSALUC for the ES cells and the in vitro differentiated cells, respectively. A value of 20 RLU/µg of total protein corresponds to about three molecules of luciferase per cell (data not shown). At the same time, the wild-type ES cell negative controls showed values ranging from 1 to 7 RLU/µg of total protein which is considered as experimental background. For the following evaluations, we considered luciferase expression levels >15 RLU/µg of total protein as real expression.

Table 1.
Evaluation of luciferase expression in Cre-activatable ROSALUC before and after in vitro differentiation of ES cells

The activation of the reporter gene by Cre mediated inversion (Figure 1C) was evaluated upon stable transfection of Cre recombinase. Luciferase activation was monitored before and after in vitro differentiation. As shown in Table 1, an ~600-fold induction in luciferase expression was observed before differentiation and a 400-fold induction seen after differentiation in the presence of Cre. This indicates that the luciferase gene in ROSALUC is under strict control of the recombinase and hence activatable. The ROSALUC mES cell clone was subsequently used to establish a transgenic mouse line.

In vivo activation of Cre-dependent luciferase expression in ROSALUC transgenic mice

To investigate the control of Cre-mediated activation in vivo, ROSALUC transgenic mice were established and mated to the conditional Cre deleter mouse strain, ROSA26-CreERT2 (37). In ROSA26-CreERT2 mice, the CreERT2 fusion gene is under the control of the ROSA26 promoter and hence ubiquitously expressed in all organs. However, only the presence of the synthetic ligand, Tam, leads to its activation.

ROSALUC mice were mated to ROSA26-CreERT2 mice and the resulting bitransgenic progeny was analyzed for Tamoxifen (Tam) inducible activation of the luciferase gene by non-invasive bioluminescence imaging (BLI).

Luciferase expression was undetectable in bitransgenic mice in the absence of the inducer (Figure 3A-a). Similarly, lack of bioluminescence was confirmed for the two single transgenic controls, i.e. the ROSA26-CreERT2 and ROSALUC mice, respectively. Importantly, luminescence was undetectable even when applying an exposure time of 5min. This suggests that in ROSA26-CreERT2, the activity of the CreERT2 fusion is strictly regulated by the inducer and does not show detectable background recombination in the absence of Tam. To study the in vivo activation, the mice were induced with Tam. As shown in Figure 3A-b, ubiquitous luciferase expression was detected in the induced double transgenic mouse whereas no background luciferase expression was observed in the non-induced mice. Similarly, no signal was detected in the ROSA26-CreERT2 and ROSALUC single transgenic control mice. These results show that upon Tam induction, the ubiquitously expressed CreERT2 fusion protein mediates recombination between the inversely oriented loxP sites, resulting in the activation of luciferase. Also, no detectable luciferase expression in the single transgenic ROSALUC control mouse by BLI further proves that in the absence of Cre recombinase, there is no background luciferase expression.

Figure 3.
In vivo activation of Cre-dependent luciferase expression in bitransgenic ROSALUC X ROSA26-CreERT2 mice. (A) In vivo non-invasive bioluminescent imaging (BLI) of ROSALUC X ROSA26-CreERT2 offsprings. (a) BLI image of non-induced animals. Four-weeks-old ...

For quantitative evaluation, bitransgenic ROSALUC X ROSA26-CreERT2 mice (induced and non-induced) were sacrificed. Luciferase was assayed in various tissue samples. As shown in Figure 3B, ubiquitous luciferase expression was detected in all investigated tissue samples obtained from induced ROSALUC X ROSA26-CreERT2 mice. The values obtained for the non-induced bitransgenic mice were <2 RLU/µg which is comparable to the values obtained from the single transgenic ROSALUC and ROSA26-CreERT2 control mice (not shown). These quantitative luciferase data thus confirm the observations made by non-invasive BLI.

The fact that Cre induced expression is detected in brain is different from previous studies employing the lacZ reporter, where no expression in brain could be detected upon Tam administration (37). This indicates that the luciferase reporter is more sensitive and can monitor even a low Cre activity in brain, which is probably impaired due to the inefficient transfer of Tam across the blood–brain barrier. Such a limitation might be overcome in optimized feeding protocols.

As a control, we evaluated the luciferase expression in ROSAConL mice which constitutively express luciferase from the ROSA26 promoter. ROSAConL were obtained from ROSALUC upon mating to K14Cre mice (33) and screening the progeny for permanent inversion of the luciferase cassette and absence of Cre. As shown in Figure 4, generally, more homogenous expression of luciferase was detected. Also, lower levels of luciferase were monitored in ROSAConL mice if compared to ROSALUC X ROSA26-CreERT2 as shown in Figure 3. We attribute strain specific properties for the various levels of ROSA26 activity in the two mice since the ROSAConL mice have been backcrossed to Balb/C to higher generations, while the ROSALUC X ROSA26-CreERT2 animals display a mixed background of 129/OLA, Balb/C and C57/Bl6. The impact of the genetic background on expression of (trans-)genes and promoter activity has been observed in other studies (38–40).

Figure 4.
Monitoring luciferase expression in the different organs isolated from ROSAConL mice. The 4–8-weeks-old ROSAConL mice were sacrificed and various organs were isolated. Tissue lysates obtained were subjected to a luciferase assay. The luciferase ...

We also evaluated Cre mediated activation of luciferase mRNA by RT–PCR. Lung and liver were used for this purpose. As shown in the Supplementary Data, inversion of the luciferase cassette was observed for the Tam treated double transgenic animals as well as for ROSAConL control mice, while tissues from non-induced mice did not show any band after 30 cycles of amplification. Thus, the RT–PCR results confirm tight regulation of the cassettes.

Together, the results obtained by BLI, quantitative luciferase expression and RT–PCR indicate a strict Tam-inducible Cre-mediated activation of the luciferase reporter gene. Moreover, the data provided in Figure 3A and B clearly exclude any Cre-independent activation of the cassette (e.g. due to chromosomal read-in from 3′-promoter (41) and expression of luciferase from an antisense transcript). Thus, the design of the Cre reporter construct as shown in Figure 1 allows for tight regulation.

Tight control in ROSALUC mice expressing high levels of CreERT2

The absence of expression in ROSALUC single transgenic mice clearly excludes any leakiness due to the reporter cassette per se. However, accidental activation of the transgene cassette could also occur due to leakiness in the Cre control, in fusion proteins of Cre and the hormone receptor moieties (42–44). It is discussed that proteolytic cleavage of the fusion protein is the molecular cause of this (22,37,42,44). Alternatively, CreERT2 might enter the nucleus upon cell division. For both mechanisms the expression level of CreERT2 would affect basal activity and thus leakiness. Indeed, Imayoshi et al. (42) demonstrated that the expression level of CreERT2 is a crucial factor for obtaining Tam-mediated regulation. Thus, the tight control of our system as depicted in Figure 3 might be associated to limited CreERT2 expression as a consequence of the moderate expression level mediated by the ROSA26 promoter.

We tested if our system would still confer strict regulation in presence of high level expression of CreERT2. For this purpose ROSALUC was crossed to Alb-CreERT2 mice in which the CreERT2 coding sequence is inserted into the serum albumin locus (45). Alb-CreERT2 mice were shown to selectively express CreERT2 in almost all hepatocytes in the adult liver (45) and activate Cre upon Tam administration. Moreover, the albumin promoter is highly expressed in hepatocytes (46).

In a similar approach as described earlier, double transgenic ROSALUC X Alb-CreERT2 mice were imaged for bioluminescence in the non-induced state (Figure 5A-a). No bioluminescent signal was detected in the liver or any other tissue. To investigate the liver-specific activation of the floxed luciferase gene in vivo, the mice were induced with Tam. As it can be seen in Figure 5A-b, activation of the luciferase gene was detected in the central area of the induced bitransgenic mouse. Quantitative luciferase data were also obtained from the different organs. As seen in Figure 5B, in the absence of Tam a residual luciferase expression level of ~20 RLU/µg of total protein was observed in the livers of the double transgenic mice in contrast to the single transgenic control mice. This activity corresponds to approximately three luciferase molecules per cell. Interestingly, a residual expression level could not be detected by RT–PCR (Supplementary Data). All other organs isolated from these non-induced bitransgenic mice did not show any background luciferase expression (data not shown). A dramatic (244-fold) activation in luciferase expression was seen selectively in the liver of the induced double transgenic mice when compared to the expression data obtained for the non-induced mice. This amount of luciferase expression in the liver corresponds to approximately 700 luciferase molecules per cell. Also, no luciferase expression was observed for the single transgenic control mice. RT–PCR confirmed the tight regulation in this model (Supplementary Data).

Figure 5.
In vivo activation of Cre-dependent luciferase expression in bitransgenic ROSALUC X Alb-CreERT2mice. (A) In vivo non-invasive bioluminescent imaging (BLI) of ROSALUC X Alb-CreERT2 mice offsprings. (a) BLI image of animals not induced with Tam. Four-weeks-old ...

Previously, it was shown that efficiency of Cre mediated recombination is affected by the nature and accessibility of the chromosomal site of the recombination targets (37,44,47). Here, we show that apart from this, a high level of CreERT2 expression in a specific tissue can account for leaky expression. The moderate expression level of CreERT2 from the ROSA26 promoter does not induce any background expression, but is sufficient to activate the target gene. Expression from other regulatory elements might differ and thus, lead to elevated background levels of the target gene, as it is the case for the albumin promoter driven CreERT2.

Together, these data highlight the requirement for careful evaluation of a specific combination of CreERT2 effector expression and the position of the loxP reporter system to validate the performance. In this respect, more advanced fusions of Cre with the estrogen receptor moieties might help to overcome limitations due to Cre mediated leakiness (23,48).

Immunological assay to evaluate the tightness of gene regulation

The results obtained from the luciferase reporter mice confirmed tight regulation of the transgene. Still, a low basal luciferase activity was detected in the liver. This residual activity however, was accompanied with a high statistical variation. If this basal activity is due to intrinsic fluctuation of expression in the mice or to experimental errors is not clear.

The immune response to antigens is an extremely sensitive in vivo assay that monitors any accidental activation by rendering the animals tolerant towards the respective antigen. We and others have shown that when low expressed protein are not detectable using sensitive biochemical methods, these little expression levels could provide a strong immune response (49). We decided to make use of this highly sensitive biological activity to challenge the tightness of the above described system. To test the strictness of gene regulation we integrated the Ovalbumin gene (OVA) as a model antigen into the ROSA26 locus via RMCE. The OVA antigen was flanked with inverse loxP sites and placed in antisense orientation according to the reporter gene configuration (Figure 1). ROSAOVA subclones obtained upon correct exchange event were confirmed by Southern blot as well as PCR analysis (data not shown). A transgenic mouse line was established and subsequently mated to the Alb-CreERT2 mice (45) to obtain double transgenic ROSAOVA X Alb-CreERT2 progeny.

Cre-activatable OVA expression and presentation of the OVA epitope by MHC-I in hepatocytes isolated from ROSAOVA X Alb-CreERT2 mice was tested. For this purpose, an in vitro coculture assay was performed (Figure 6). Hepatocytes were isolated from six male double transgenic mice of which three were induced with Tam and three were non-induced. The hepatocytes were then cocultured with CD8+ T cells from OT-I T cell receptor transgenic mice for 72 h. OT-I CD8+ T cells express T cell receptor specific for the OVA peptide which would get activated upon recognition of OVA epitope in context with MHC-I. This activation, in turn, can be monitored by IFN-γ release by the T cells. As can be seen in Figure 6, the OT-I CD8+ T cells cocultured with hepatocytes isolated from the three induced mice showed proliferation and activation with IFN-γ release of as high as 1ng/ml whereas for the non-induced mice, no proliferation was observed similar to the single transgenic controls. The result from this experiment confirms the strict Cre-dependent and inducible activation of the transgene-encoded antigen expression in the hepatocytes of ROSAOVA X Alb-CreERT2 mice. Importantly, when subjecting the non-parenchymal cell fraction from the livers of these mice to this assay, no IFN-γ release was detected, clearly excluding unintended presentation of OVA from these cells (data not shown). This indicates that the OVA antigen expression and presentation of its epitope is strict hepatocyte-specific.

Figure 6.
In vitro coculture assay to evaluate Cre-activatable OVA expression in hepatocytes from ROSAOVA X Alb-CreERT2 mice. The above figure depicts the OVA antigen cassette as integrated in the ROSA26 locus in ROSAOVA mice via RMCE. ROSAOVA mice were mated to ...

Finally, we tested if upon induction of antigen (OVA) expression in hepatocytes, OVA would be recognized as a newly expressed protein (neo antigen) and thus results in an immune response. For this purpose, we bred the mice to OT-I mice (50). In the resulting triple transgenic OT-1 X ROSAOVA X Alb-CreERT2 mice, OT-I CD8+ T cells were not deleted and were detected at levels comparable to control OT-I mice mice (data not shown). Moreover, the mice displayed normal levels of ALT, a serum enzyme that is released upon killing of hepatocytes (Figure 7A). This indicates that in the non-induced state the T cells are not activated.

Figure 7.
Induced hepatitis upon Tam treatment in OT-I X ROSAOVA X Alb-CreERT2 mice. (A) Determination of ALT activity in blood of OT-I X ROSAOVA X Alb-CreERT2 mice. The 8-weeks-old OT-I X ROSAOVA X Alb-CreERT2 were induced with Tam and blood was collected for ...

Upon induction of OVA expression by Tam we monitored the ALT. A massive increase of ALT was detected 2 days upon induction (Figure 7A). The mice were sacrificed and liver samples showed infiltration of mononuclear cells and dying hepatocytes (Figure 7B). Together, this shows that the OVA antigen is recognized as a neo antigen and is thus strictly controlled in this model.

Together, we show that the strategy of inverse integration of a floxed transgene into the ubiquitously active ROSA26 locus provides tightly controlled transgene expression. Due to the availability of this locus via RMCE, this strategy represents a flexible platform for the establishment of transgenic mouse models in which tight regulation of the transgene is crucial.

The strength of target gene activation depends on its accessibility towards inversion and on the strength of its expression. In the experimental design presented here, wild-type loxP sites were employed. As a consequence continuous ‘flipping’ (repeated inversion) will occur as long as Cre recombinase is present. Hence, theoretically only 50% of the cells will express luciferase. For certain applications, however, 100% expressing cells maybe required whereby this system could then be exploited by using mutant loxP sites for effecting a permanent switch (51–53). Thus, by choosing appropriate expression conditions for CreERT2 and the target gene, maximal gene activation with minimal background/basal expression can be reached.

As immunological assays are exquisitely specific and sensitive (far beyond the resolution of most biochemical assays), the data presented exclude biologically relevant leakiness. We cannot exclude that for some applications such as activation of an oncogene in a tumor initiating cell, stochastic gene activations could lead to consequences even in this experimental setting. The flexibility of the described system however allows for rapid testing of various cassette designs and has hence a unique advantage to facilitate easy access to mouse models that address such questions.


German Ministry for Research and Education (FKZ 0313940; PTJ-Bio/0313735/Nn07-06; PTJ-Bio/0315271A); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Wi2648, DFG Schi 505/5-1, and Excellence Cluster REBIRTH) the European Union (FlpFlex MEST-CT-2004-504990; Clinigene, LSHB-CT-2006-018933), MIDITRAIN (Molecular Interactions during Infection Training)- A Marie Curie Early Stage Training (EST) of the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme under Contract number MEST-2004-504990.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.

Supplementary Data:


The authors thank Anton Berns for providing the ROSA26-CreERT2 transgenic mice. The authors also thank Dr Martin Hafner for organizing the Blastocyst injections as well as Kirsten Marlen Kleemann and Katrin Kränzler for breeding and maintenance of the transgenic mice; the authors thank Petra Buhr for skilled technical assistance. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Christian Wahl and Dr Petra Riedl for helpful discussions.


1. Branda CS, Dymecki SM. Talking about a revolution: the impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice. Dev Cell. 2004;6:7–28. [PubMed]
2. Gossen M, Bujard H. Studying gene function in eukaryotes by conditional gene inactivation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2002;36:153–173. [PubMed]
3. Lewandoski M. Conditional control of gene expression in the mouse. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001;2:743–755. [PubMed]
4. May T, Hauser H, Wirth D. Current status of transcriptional regulation systems. Cytotechnology. 2006;50:109–119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Sun Y, Chen X, Xiao D. Tetracycline-inducible expression systems: new strategies and practices in the transgenic mouse modeling. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2007;39:235–246. [PubMed]
6. Gossen M, Bujard H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:5547–5551. [PubMed]
7. May T, Hauser H, Wirth D. Transcriptional control of SV40 T-antigen expression allows a complete reversion of immortalization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:5529–5538. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Wong ET, Kolman JL, Li YC, Mesner LD, Hillen W, Berens C, Wahl GM. Reproducible doxycycline-inducible transgene expression at specific loci generated by Cre-recombinase mediated cassette exchange. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Kistner A, Gossen M, Zimmermann F, Jerecic J, Ullmer C, Lubbert H, Bujard H. Doxycycline-mediated quantitative and tissue-specific control of gene expression in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:10933–10938. [PubMed]
10. Lottmann H, Vanselow J, Hessabi B, Walther R. The Tet-On system in transgenic mice: inhibition of the mouse pdx-1 gene activity by antisense RNA expression in pancreatic beta-cells. J. Mol. Med. 2001;79:321–328. [PubMed]
11. Traykova-Brauch M, Schonig K, Greiner O, Miloud T, Jauch A, Bode M, Felsher DW, Glick AB, Kwiatkowski DJ, Bujard H, et al. An efficient and versatile system for acute and chronic modulation of renal tubular function in transgenic mice. Nat. Med. 2008;14:979–984. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. May T, Eccleston L, Herrmann S, Hauser H, Goncalves J, Wirth D. Bimodal and hysteretic expression in mammalian cells from a synthetic gene circuit. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Lakso M, Sauer B, Mosinger B, Jr, Lee EJ, Manning RW, Yu SH, Mulder KL, Westphal H. Targeted oncogene activation by site-specific recombination in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:6232–6236. [PubMed]
14. Luche H, Weber O, Nageswara Rao T, Blum C, Fehling HJ. Faithful activation of an extra-bright red fluorescent protein in “knock-in” Cre-reporter mice ideally suited for lineage tracing studies. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006;37:43–53. [PubMed]
15. Mao X, Fujiwara Y, Chapdelaine A, Yang H, Orkin SH. Activation of EGFP expression by Cre-mediated excision in a new ROSA26 reporter mouse strain. Blood. 2001;97:324–326. [PubMed]
16. Safran M, Kim WY, Kung AL, Horner JW, DePinho RA, Kaelin WG., Jr Mouse reporter strain for noninvasive bioluminescent imaging of cells that have undergone Cre-mediated recombination. Mol. Imaging. 2003;2:297–302. [PubMed]
17. Soriano P. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat. Genet. 1999;21:70–71. [PubMed]
18. Srinivas S, Watanabe T, Lin CS, William CM, Tanabe Y, Jessell TM, Costantini F. Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev. Biol. 2001;1:4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Feil R, Brocard J, Mascrez B, LeMeur M, Metzger D, Chambon P. Ligand-activated site-specific recombination in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:10887–10890. [PubMed]
20. Feil R, Wagner J, Metzger D, Chambon P. Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by mutated estrogen receptor ligand-binding domains. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997;237:752–757. [PubMed]
21. Indra AK, Warot X, Brocard J, Bornert JM, Xiao JH, Chambon P, Metzger D. Temporally-controlled site-specific mutagenesis in the basal layer of the epidermis: comparison of the recombinase activity of the tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ER(T) and Cre-ER(T2) recombinases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:4324–4327. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Zhang Y, Riesterer C, Ayrall AM, Sablitzky F, Littlewood TD, Reth M. Inducible site-directed recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:543–548. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Jullien N, Goddard I, Selmi-Ruby S, Fina JL, Cremer H, Herman JP. Use of ERT2-iCre-ERT2 for conditional transgenesis. Genesis. 2008;46:193–199. [PubMed]
24. Kwissa M, Unsinger J, Schirmbeck R, Hauser H, Reimann J. Polyvalent DNA vaccines with bidirectional promoters. J. Mol. Med. 2000;78:495–506. [PubMed]
25. Ernst E, Schonig K, Bugert JJ, Blaker H, Pfaff E, Stremmel W, Encke J. Generation of inducible hepatitis C virus transgenic mouse lines. J. Med. Virol. 2007;79:1103–1112. [PubMed]
26. Manickan E, Satoi J, Wang TC, Liang TJ. Conditional liver-specific expression of simian virus 40 T antigen leads to regulatable development of hepatic neoplasm in transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:13989–13994. [PubMed]
27. Schlake T, Bode J. Use of mutated FLP recognition target (FRT) sites for the exchange of expression cassettes at defined chromosomal loci. Biochemistry. 1994;33:12746–12751. [PubMed]
28. Schucht R, Coroadinha AS, Zanta-Boussif MA, Verhoeyen E, Carrondo MJ, Hauser H, Wirth D. A new generation of retroviral producer cells: predictable and stable virus production by Flp-mediated site-specific integration of retroviral vectors. Mol. Ther. 2006;14:285–292. [PubMed]
29. Robanus-Maandag E, Dekker M, van der Valk M, Carrozza ML, Jeanny JC, Dannenberg JH, Berns A, te Riele H. p107 is a suppressor of retinoblastoma development in pRb-deficient mice. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1599–1609. [PubMed]
30. Schaft J, Ashery-Padan R, van der Hoeven F, Gruss P, Stewart AF. Efficient FLP recombination in mouse ES cells and oocytes. Genesis. 2001;31:6–10. [PubMed]
31. Gu H, Zou YR, Rajewsky K. Independent control of immunoglobulin switch recombination at individual switch regions evidenced through Cre-loxP-mediated gene targeting. Cell. 1993;73:1155–1164. [PubMed]
32. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem. 1985;150:76–85. [PubMed]
33. Hafner M, Wenk J, Nenci A, Pasparakis M, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Smyth N, Peters T, Kess D, Holtkotter O, Shephard P, et al. Keratin 14 Cre transgenic mice authenticate keratin 14 as an oocyte-expressed protein. Genesis. 2004;38:176–181. [PubMed]
34. Wahl C, Bochtler P, Chen L, Schirmbeck R, Reimann J. B7-H1 on hepatocytes facilitates priming of specific CD8 T cells but limits the specific recall of primed responses. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:980–988. [PubMed]
35. Nehlsen K, Schucht R, da Gama-Norton L, Kromer W, Baer A, Cayli A, Hauser H, Wirth D. Recombinant protein expression by targeting pre-selected chromosomal loci. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9:100. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Verhoeyen E, Hauser H, Wirth D. Evaluation of retroviral vector design in defined chromosomal loci by Flp-mediated cassette replacement. Hum. Gene Ther. 2001;12:933–944. [PubMed]
37. Hameyer D, Loonstra A, Eshkind L, Schmitt S, Antunes C, Groen A, Bindels E, Jonkers J, Krimpenfort P, Meuwissen R, et al. Toxicity of ligand-dependent Cre recombinases and generation of a conditional Cre deleter mouse allowing mosaic recombination in peripheral tissues. Physiol. Genomics. 2007;31:32–41. [PubMed]
38. Dames P, Ortiz A, Schillinger U, Lesina E, Plank C, Rosenecker J, Rudolph C. Aerosol gene delivery to the murine lung is mouse strain dependent. J. Mol. Med. 2007;85:371–378. [PubMed]
39. Noyes HA, Agaba M, Anderson S, Archibald AL, Brass A, Gibson J, Hall L, Hulme H, Oh SJ, Kemp S. Genotype and expression analysis of two inbred mouse strains and two derived congenic strains suggest that most gene expression is trans regulated and sensitive to genetic background. BMC Genomics. 11:361. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Robertson A, Perea J, Tolmachova T, Thomas PK, Huxley C. Effects of mouse strain, position of integration and tetracycline analogue on the tetracycline conditional system in transgenic mice. Gene. 2002;282:65–74. [PubMed]
41. Zambrowicz BP, Imamoto A, Fiering S, Herzenberg LA, Kerr WG, Soriano P. Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:3789–3794. [PubMed]
42. Imayoshi I, Ohtsuka T, Metzger D, Chambon P, Kageyama R. Temporal regulation of Cre recombinase activity in neural stem cells. Genesis. 2006;44:233–238. [PubMed]
43. Schwenk F, Kuhn R, Angrand PO, Rajewsky K, Stewart AF. Temporally and spatially regulated somatic mutagenesis in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:1427–1432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Vooijs M, Jonkers J, Berns A. A highly efficient ligand-regulated Cre recombinase mouse line shows that LoxP recombination is position dependent. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:292–297. [PubMed]
45. Schuler M, Dierich A, Chambon P, Metzger D. Efficient temporally controlled targeted somatic mutagenesis in hepatocytes of the mouse. Genesis. 2004;39:167–172. [PubMed]
46. Hsiang CH, Marten NW, Straus DS. Upstream region of rat serum albumin gene promoter contributes to promoter activity: presence of functional binding site for hepatocyte nuclear factor-3. Biochem. J. 1999;338(Pt 2):241–249. [PubMed]
47. Seibler J, Zevnik B, Kuter-Luks B, Andreas S, Kern H, Hennek T, Rode A, Heimann C, Faust N, Kauselmann G, et al. Rapid generation of inducible mouse mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Matsuda T, Cepko CL. Controlled expression of transgenes introduced by in vivo electroporation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:1027–1032. [PubMed]
49. Schirmbeck R, Riedl P, Fissolo N, Lemonnier FA, Bertoletti A, Reimann J. Translation from cryptic reading frames of DNA vaccines generates an extended repertoire of immunogenic, MHC class I-restricted epitopes. J. Immunol. 2005;174:4647–4656. [PubMed]
50. Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell. 1994;76:17–27. [PubMed]
51. Schnutgen F, Ghyselinck NB. Adopting the good reFLEXes when generating conditional alterations in the mouse genome. Transgenic Res. 2007;16:405–413. [PubMed]
52. Schnutgen F, De-Zolt S, Van Sloun P, Hollatz M, Floss T, Hansen J, Altschmied J, Seisenberger C, Ghyselinck NB, Ruiz P, et al. Genomewide production of multipurpose alleles for the functional analysis of the mouse genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:7221–7226. [PubMed]
53. Zhang Z, Lutz B. Cre recombinase-mediated inversion using lox66 and lox71: method to introduce conditional point mutations into the CREB-binding protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press