|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor protein (VHL), when mutated and inactivated, has been associated with renal and CNS cancer development. VHL normally plays an important role in targeting for degradation of the HIF-1α (hypoxia inducible factor-1α) transcription factor, a primary positive regulator of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production. In this report we demonstrate that VHL destabilization can be induced by Src kinase and may be involved in other cancers, including breast cancer. We have found that elevated Src can trigger a drastic reduction in VHL stability even under normoxic conditions, through phosphorylation of VHL tyrosine residue 185, leading to ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation of VHL. The Src-induced degradation of VHL protein leads to increased HIF-1α levels and transcriptional activity and increased VEGF production. In this manner, Src regulation of VHL protein stability may play an important role in promoting VEGF expression, tumor angiogenesis, and cancer progression.
Src is a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase that can contribute to cancer development and progression, when mutated or overexpressed. Src protein levels and/or Src protein kinase activity are frequently elevated in human cancers and cell lines, including those of the breast,1,2 colon,3-6 brain,7,8 and pancreas.9,10 Our laboratory has previously reported elevated levels of endogenous Src activity in breast and colon cancer cells, ranging from 1.7- to 17.3-fold,2,6 and that Src kinase can be activated by high levels of the protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B in breast and colon cancer cells.2,6,11 Furthermore, Src has been shown to be activated by a mutation resulting in truncation of the Src protein in a subset of advanced metastatic colon carcinomas.5 Elevated Src activity has been reported to upregulate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production in several normal and tumorigenic cells types.12-14 Src has also been shown to be required for VEGF-mediated vascular permeability.15 These and other findings indicate that one means through which Src can promote tumor development is by stimulation of angiogenesis.
VEGF production is normally regulated by changes in tissue oxygenation. Under normoxic conditions, the von Hippel–Lindau protein (VHL, an E3 ligase) is capable of physically binding to and triggering proteasome-mediated destruction of a proline-hydroxylated form of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), the regulatable component of the HIF-1 transcription factor heterodimer. Therefore, in the presence of VHL, HIF-1α is targeted for proteasome-mediated degradation.16-18 However, under hypoxic conditions, such as those existing within interior regions of solid tumors, hydroxylation of HIF-1α is inhibited, thus preventing binding of VHL to HIF-1α and preventing HIF-1α degradation in these tumor cells. The HIF-1 transcription factor is then able to recognize the VEGF promoter and upregulate VEGF transcription. VEGF produced and secreted from the tumor cells is able to bind to cell surface receptors on endothelial cells, stimulating endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis and contributing to tumor progression and metastasis.19,20
Importantly, functional inactivation of the VHL tumor suppressor protein through germline mutations has been documented in highly vascular tumors that overproduce VEGF, such as renal carcinomas, phaeochromocytomas, and central nervous system hemangioblastomas.21-26 In this article, we report that elevated Src activity in breast cancer and other cell lines can drastically reduce VHL stability and half-life under normoxic conditions. Specifically, elevated Src activity can mediate increased tyrosine phosphorylation of VHL and ubiquitination of VHL, which promotes degradation of VHL in 26S proteasomes. Our results demonstrate that a dramatic reduction of VHL levels mediated by Src can contribute to increased cellular synthesis of VEGF, via increased levels of HIF-1α protein. Overall, we have found an important mechanism of Src-dependent destabilization of VHL protein that is likely to be involved in promoting tumor angiogenesis and tumorigenesis.
Src has been implicated as an important signaling component in hypoxia-induced upregulation of VEGF.12-14 In addition, Src activation appears to play a role in VEGF production and vascularization by some colon and ovarian cancer cells.13,14,27 When we examined several breast carcinoma cell lines that have previously been reported by our lab to exhibit high levels of endogenous Src activity,2,11 we found that they also produced higher levels of VEGF, relative to the nontumorigenic breast epithelial cell line MCF-10A, even under normoxic conditions (20% O2; Fig. 1A). We also found that some breast carcinoma cells lines, such as SK-BR-3 and Hs 578T that exhibited elevated levels of endogenous Src activity,2 had lower levels of endogenous VHL and higher levels of tyrosine phosphorylated VHL (Fig. 1B). Thus, these results suggested that high Src activity was correlated with decreased VHL protein levels.
In order to study the effect of elevated Src activity on VHL protein levels, we transiently transfected Src into HEK 293T cells. We found that both elevated wild-type Src levels (WT Src) as well as elevated constitutively active Src levels (Y530F Src) were associated with reduced endogenous VHL protein levels, concomitant with increased tyrosine phosphorylation of VHL by Src (Fig. 1Cii, lanes 3 and 4) and increased polyubiquitinated VHL (Fig. 1Ciii; lanes 3 and 4). In further experiments, we found that the 26S proteosome inhibitor MG132 could protect exogenously expressed VHL from degradation induced by elevated Src levels (Fig. 1D, lane 9). This finding suggests that the Src-mediated reduction in VHL protein levels is likely due to proteasome-dependent degradation. We have also found that activated Src did not downregulate transcription of VHL mRNA, based on RT-PCR experiments (unpublished observations).
In order to confirm that Src was involved in destabilizing VHL, we used siRNA to knock down Src levels. In these experiments, we observed 70% knockdown in Src protein levels, compared to Src protein levels in cells transfected with control, nontargeting siRNA in HEK 293T as well as in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells (Fig. 2 Ai and Bii; Fig. 2C). Knockdown of Src was associated with 4-fold increases of VHL protein levels (Fig. 2 Ai, ,Bi;Bi; Fig. 2C). Also, there was decreased phosphorylation of VHL accompanying increased endogenous p30 and p19 VHL protein levels (Fig. 2Ai). siRNA targeting of VHL was also used to confirm the identity of the p30 and p19 VHL proteins. Moreover, consistent with our earlier data, transfection of Src-specific siRNA was associated with a 60% decrease in VEGF protein (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, treatment of NIH 3T3 cells with the Src inhibitor PP2 effectively decreased Src activity, as reflected in lower Y419 phosphorylation, and was associated with increased stability of VHL protein, along with lower levels of ubiquitinated VHL (Supplementary Fig. S1). Thus, these results support a significant role for Src and Src activity in downregulating VHL protein levels that can ultimately upregulate VEGF (summarized in the model in Fig. 3).
We conducted cycloheximide block experiments in order to study the effect of elevated Src levels on VHL half-life. When HEK 293T cells were transfected with empty vector (pCI) and VHL expression plasmid (Fl-VHL-GFP), the exogenously expressed VHL was very stable and exhibited a half-life of greater than 16 h (Fig. 4Ai, left panel; Fig. 4Aii). In contrast, when cells were cotransfected with constitutively active Src and Fl-VHL-GFP, VHL exhibited a drastically shortened half-life of approximately 5 h (Fig. 4Ai, middle panel; Fig. 4Aii). Interestingly, when the cells were transfected with kinase dead Src and Fl-VHL-GFP, VHL exhibited a half-life of about 12 h (Fig. 4Ai, right panel; Fig. 4Aii). The intermediate level of VHL half-life reduction observed in the presence of kinase dead Src suggested that there might also be a kinase-independent function of Src that could play a partial role in VHL downregulation. 35S metabolic labeling-chase experiments also confirmed that elevated Src activity was correlated with a shortened half-life of VHL (Fig. 4B). Similar reductions in VHL protein stability were also observed for endogenous VHL in HEK 293T cells. When HEK 293T cells were transfected with constitutively active Src, levels of endogenous VHL p30 and p19 were reduced down to about 50% within 6 to 8 h (Fig. 4C).
Fluorescence microscopy was also used to demonstrate the effects of Src on VHL stability. Cellular levels of VHL could be detected by the signal produced by the green fluorescent protein (GFP)–tagged VHL epifluorescence when introduced into the RCC 786-O cell line (a renal cell carcinoma cell line lacking endogenous wild-type VHL, as previously described28). Cells cotransfected with Fl-VHL-GFP and activated Src exhibited a 66% decrease in intensity of the green fluorescent signal, in comparison to control cells cotransfected with Flag-VHL-GFP and empty vector (Fig. 5A). In contrast, cells cotransfected with Flag-VHL-GFP and kinase dead Src exhibited only a small 22% decrease in green fluorescent signal (Fig. 5A). These results could also suggest that the kinase dead form of Src may have a small destabilizing effect on VHL protein. However, the greatest effect was that of activated Src on decreased Fl-VHL-GFP protein levels.
In order to determine effects of Src-mediated destabilization of VHL protein on levels of HIF-1α, we used assays involving a luciferase reporter plasmid that contained 3 hypoxia responsive element (HRE) binding sites for HIF-1α. As seen in Figure 5Bi, activated Src upregulated HRE-luciferase reporter activity by 3.6-fold (Fig. 5Bi, left group). Src kinase activity was required for this upregulation, as it was not observed with the kinase dead Src mutant (Fig. 5Bi, left group). We further performed reciprocal dose-response experiments by introducing graduated amounts of activated Src plasmid or Fl-VHL-GFP plasmid, respectively, into HEK 293T cells (Fig. 5Bi, middle and right groups). Introduction of increasing amounts of activated Src plasmid was able to override the dampening effects of Fl-VHL-GFP plasmid (Fig. 5Bi, middle group). In contrast, in reverse dose-response experiments, with the introduction of increasing amounts of Fl-VHL-GFP plasmid in the presence of constant amounts of activated Src plasmid, the HRE-luciferase reporter activity decreased to subbasal levels (Fig. 5Bi, right group). Immunoblot analyses further supported this interrelationship between Src and VHL (Fig. 5Bii). Taken together, these results and our previous results indicate that Src activation promotes destabilization of VHL and also causes increased levels of HIF-1α and HIF-1α activity, as well as increased levels of VEGF.
Tubulogenesis in vitro can be used as a means to monitor proangiogenic activity. We conducted endothelial tube formation assays to study the effects of Src-directed destabilization of VHL protein on endothelial tube formation, following previously published protocols.29,30 In this assay, endothelial cells will form capillary networks when seeded on Matrigel in response to angiogenic factors such as VEGF that are present in conditioned media. The extent and lengths of endothelial tube formation are indicators of the angiogenic potential. As seen in Figure 6A, significant endothelial tube formation occurred in the presence of conditioned medium from HEK 293T cells that had been transfected with activated Src. In contrast, the least amount of tube formation was observed with conditioned medium from cells transfected with a control vector alone or with Fl-VHL-GFP alone, and endothelial tube formation was also reduced when Fl-VHL-GFP was cotransfected with activated Src.
As another readout for the effects of Src destruction of VHL tumor suppressor protein on angiogenesis, we performed chorioallantoic membrane assays. In this assay, blood vasculature of the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) grows in response to growth signals received from cells loaded onto gelatin sponges placed onto the CAM, as previously described.31 The average lengths of vasculature per field are indicators of angiogenic potential. As shown in Figure 6B, extensive angiogenesis occurred in the presence of HEK 293T cells that had been transfected with activated Src. In contrast, the least angiogenesis occurred in cells transfected with a control vector alone or with Flag-VHL-GFP alone, and angiogenesis was also reduced when Fl-VHL-GFP was cotransfected with activated Src.
In vitro kinase reactions with purified baculovirus expressed human Src kinase and GST-VHL wild-type (GST-VHL WT) were performed in an attempt to determine the site(s) on VHL phosphorylated by Src kinase. Phosphorylation of GST-VHL occurred only in the presence of Src, and control GST alone was not phosphorylated by purified Src kinase (Fig. 7A). These results indicated that Src is able to directly phosphorylate VHL. Phospho-GST-VHL produced in this manner was isolated and purified by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Tyrosine phosphorylation on Src phosphorylated GST-VHL was mapped through mass spectrometric analysis performed by the proteomics center at the University of Victoria. This analysis indicated that Src was able to phosphorylate VHL tyrosine residue 185 (Fig. 7B and Supplementary Fig. S2). This residue closely matches the consensus sequence for Src phosphorylation and lies within the α domain of VHL.32 As Y185 was the only phosphorylation site detected in this analysis, it is likely to be the major Src phosphorylation site in VHL.
When we coexpressed constitutively active Src with wild-type VHL (WT VHL) or with a Y185F point mutant of VHL (Y185F VHL), we found that Y185F VHL protein was more stable than WT VHL (Fig. 7 C and andD).D). These results also showed that there was decreased tyrosine phosphorylation and ubiquitination when mutant Y185F VHL was coexpressed with activated Src in vivo (in intact cells; Fig. 7Ci). In contrast, in vivo tyrosine phosphorylation and ubiquitination on VHL was markedly increased when WT VHL was coexpressed with activated Src (Fig. 7Ci). Cycloheximide treatment experiments to measure protein stability further showed that Y185F VHL was resistant to Src-mediated degradation, relative to WT VHL (Fig. 7D). In total, the data indicated that Y185F mutation of VHL protein confers resistance to Src-directed degradation.
Both Src protein and Src tyrosine kinase activity are frequently elevated in human cancers and cancer cell lines, and current evidence supports a role for Src in the development, growth, progression, and metastasis of a number of human cancers, including those of the breast,1,2 colon,3-6 brain,7,8 and pancreas.33,34 In this study, we have found that elevated Src activity upregulates VEGF production in breast cancer and other cell types, and this can occur independent of hypoxia. Because VEGF is a key regulator of angiogenesis, these results suggest that, in tumors expressing elevated levels of Src kinase, it is likely that VEGF production and tumor angiogenesis can be stimulated before the onset of tumor hypoxia, in a manner that is independent of tumor size. This would contribute to both the establishment and growth of the primary tumor, as well as aid in tumor metastases even in relatively small, early stage tumors.
It appears that one mechanism by which Src causes the upregulation of VEGF in our cell models is through enhanced degradation of VHL, as measured by both a reduction in VHL protein levels and a reduction in its half-life. We noticed that the reduction in VHL protein was accompanied by increased tyrosine phosphorylation and ubiquitination of VHL, suggesting this as a possible cause of the increased rate of VHL degradation. Src has been previously demonstrated to regulate other cellular proteins through phosphorylation and ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Src promotes disruption of cell-cell adhesions in epithelial cells through tyrosine phosphorylation, leading to ubiquitination and endocytosis of E-cadherin complexes.35 This process is thought to be mediated by binding of the Hakai E3 ligase to tyrosine phosphorylated E-cadherin. In a different study, Src activation and tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Cbl E3 ligase causes Cbl to undergo self-ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated destruction.36 It may be possible that either the Hakai and c-Cbl E3 ligases are involved in Src-directed degradation of VHL, and we are currently examining these possibilities.
Destruction of VHL and upregulation of VEGF has also been attributed to contributing to malignant phenotype of some liver and gastric cancers.37 In this study, it appeared that an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2-EPF UCP) could form a complex with VHL and could catalyze ubiquitination of VHL, promoting the destruction of VHL via the 26S proteasome. The authors did not examine if there were specific upstream factors that have cooperated to facilitate the association between VHL and the E2 enzyme, and it is interesting to speculate that Src may play some role.
Accompanying the ubiquitination and degradation of VHL upon Src overexpression, we demonstrated that VHL also becomes tyrosine phosphorylated, suggesting that this phosphorylation plays a role in the aforementioned events. We went further to show that Src directly phosphorylates VHL and have identified this newly characterized phosphorylation site as tyrosine 185 within the α-domain of VHL. The α-domain is involved in the formation of the complex of proteins responsible for ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, including elongin C. Mutants of the VHL protein that we generated by mutating this tyrosine to phenylalanine cannot be phosphorylated on this site and have increased intracellular stability upon Src overexpression, strongly supporting the importance of this site in regulating some aspects of VHL stability. Phosphorylation on tyrosine 185 of VHL might affect VHL stability by disrupting protein complex formation at the α-domain, thereby targeting VHL for proteolysis by other E3 ligase complexes or by VHL self-ubiquitination. Src binding to VHL might also contribute to displacing VHL from assembly with stabilizing VHL E3 ligase complex proteins (such as elongin C and cullin 2) to further facilitate VHL destabilization. Some support for this last possibility comes from our observation that in the presence of kinase dead Src, in some experiments we observed an intermediate level of VHL destabilization, suggesting that there may also be a kinase-independent function of Src that could play a partial role in VHL downregulation. Kinase dead Src binding to VHL may directly destabilize the VHL protein or may disrupt VHL association with proteins that would otherwise stabilize VHL. Kinase-independent Src functions have also been reported independently by other labs.38,39
Although we have shown that increased degradation of VHL appears to be a major mechanism by which Src regulates VEGF levels in our model systems, other mechanisms of Src-induced VEGF upregulation have also been reported. One report communicated that Src can also regulate VEGF production by promoting elevated HIF-1α expression in NIH3T3 cells, the colon cancer line HT29, and the osteosarcoma cell line Saos-2 through increased cap-dependent translation of HIF-1α.40 Another report showed Src involvement in both constitutive and EGF-induced upregulation of VEGF through activation of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase (PI3K)–AKT and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways in pancreatic cancer cell lines.41 Thus, it appears that several mechanisms may mediate Src-induced upregulation of VEGF from tumor cells. We have not examined if more than one of these pathways are functioning to regulate VEGF levels in each of our model systems, so we are currently unable to predict whether several of these pathways are functional in a single cell type or whether different cell types each possess single regulatory mechanisms for VEGF production.
In summary, we describe a key Src-VHL pathway that is likely to be involved in tumor angiogenesis and tumor progression. We found that Src promotes the destabilization of the VHL tumor suppressor protein, which ultimately facilitates Src induction of VEGF production from cells. This mechanism of Src-dependent destruction of VHL provides novel insights into our understanding of interplay between an oncogenic protein and tumor suppressor and reveals a new mechanism of Src kinase function in targeting a tumor suppressor protein. Determining the relative contributions of the components of the Src oncoprotein-VHL tumor suppressor mechanism will be undoubtedly important in adding to our understanding of the molecular bases of cancer.
The mammalian cell lines, unless otherwise stated, were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100 units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin) (Gibco Invitrogen) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Human mammary epithelial control cell lines MCF-10-A cells were maintained in DMEM/Ham’s F12 (1:1, Gibco Invitrogen) supplemented with 5% horse serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco Invitrogen), 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (Gibco Invitrogen), 100 ng/mL cholera toxin (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), 0.01 mg/mL insulin (Sigma), 500 ng/mL hydrocortisone (Sigma), and antibiotics (100 units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin) (Gibco Invitrogen).
Anti-Src mouse monoclonal antibody 327 was purified from hybridomas provided by Dr. Joan Brugge (Harvard). Anti-VHL (FL 1-181) rabbit polyclonal antibody and anti-VEGF (A-20) rabbit polyclonal antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-VHL (1g32) mouse monoclonal antibody was purchased from BD Biosciences Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). Anti-Flag M2 mouse monoclonal antibody was purchased from Sigma. Anti-HIF-1α mouse monoclonal antibody was purchased from BD Biosciences Transduction Laboratories. Anti-α-tubulin (DM1A, CP06) mouse monoclonal antibody was purchased from Calbiochem. Antiphosphotyrosine (4G10) mouse monoclonal antibody was provided by Dr. Stephen Robbins. Antiubiquitin (Ubi-1) mouse monoclonal antibody was purchased from Zymed Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). MG-132 and PP2 were purchased from Calbiochem. Cycloheximide was purchased from Sigma. Purified baculovirus-expressed human Src kinase was prepared in our lab (available from Millipore, Billerica, MA, product 14-117).
Active Src mutant pCI-CMVp-Y530F and the kinase dead Src pCI-CMVp-K298M were generated in our laboratory using QuickChange® site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The Flag-tagged VHL-GFP expression plasmid (pcDNA3.1-CMVp-Flag-VHL-GFP) and Flag-GFP-GFP control expression plasmid (pcDNA3.1-CMVp-Flag-GFP-GFP) were kindly provided by Dr. Stephen Lee (University of Ottawa) and have been described previously.42 The GST-VHL (glutathione S-transferase–VHL) fusion construct was generated by subcloning VHL cDNA from pcDNA3.1-CMVp-Flag-VHL-GFP into pGEX-4T-3 vector (AMRAD Corporation, Melbourne, Australia). Mutant Y185F VHL was generated using QuickChange® site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene). HREx3-Luciferase reporter construct (pGL3-HREx3-SV40p-Luciferase) was a gift from Dr. Roland Wenger (University of Zurich). The LNCX-β-galactosidase expression construct (LNCX-CMVp-β-galactosidase) was from Clontech (Mountain View, CA).
Transfections were conducted as described previously.6 Forty-eight hours posttransfection, the cells were lysed in 1% NP-40 lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 1% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM EDTA, 50 µg/mL leupeptin, 10 µg/mL aprotinin, 200 µM sodium orthovanadate, 4 mg/mL p-nitrophenyl phosphate).
Immunoprecipitations were conducted as detailed previously.43 Immunoprecipitations were performed by adding 3 µg of antibody per 1-mg cell extract sample. In the case of immunoprecipitations to detect ubiquitination and phosphorylation, immunoprecipitations were conducted on boiled SDS lysates (2% SDS, 50 mM Tris [pH 6.8] lysis buffer).
Cells were seeded on 60-mm plates and subjected to appropriate transfections. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, the cells were treated with 100 µM final concentration of cycloheximide (Sigma) for 0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, or 24 h. The cells were then lysed in 1% NP-40 lysis buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
Cells were starved in methionine (Met)- and cysteine (Cys)–free medium for 2 h, then labeled in Met- and Cys-free DMEM medium (Gibco Invitrogen) containing 100 µCi/mL 35S-Met and 35S-Cys Promix cell-labeling mix (Amersham Biosciences) for 16 h to maximize labeled 35S-Met and 35S-Cys incorporation. After labeling, the cells were then washed 2 times and chased with complete DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum and unlabeled Met and Cys at 20-fold excess relative to the normal concentration in DMEM for the indicated times. Cell lysates were prepared in 1% NP-40 lysis buffer, and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-VHL polyclonal antibody. The immune complexes were then resolved by SDS-PAGE. Subsequently, the gels were fixed, treated with ENHANCE solution (Dupont NEN, Boston, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, dried, and subjected to autoradiography.
Immunostaining was conducted as detailed previously.44 Immunostaining for Src was performed for 1 h in a humidified chamber, using anti-Src 327 monoclonal antibody (1:100 dilution) in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Flag-VHL-GFP was detected by GFP fluorescence. Immunofluorescence was then visualized with 100x objective using a conventional Zeiss microscope. Photos were taken using a Photometrics CoolSNAPcl (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ) camera and RS Image software (Roper Scientific).
Unless otherwise stated, siRNAs were constructed from complementary strands of 21 nucleotide single-stranded RNAs synthesized by Dr. Richard Pon (University of Calgary Oligonucleotide Synthesis Facility). GFP siRNA was purchased from Xeragon (Valencia, CA). siRNA transfections were conducted as described previously.6
Luciferase assays were conducted using the HREx3-Luciferase reporter plasmid as described previously.45
The immortalized human endothelial cell line, EA.hy926, was a gift from Dr. Cora-Jean S. Edgell (University of North Carolina). This cell line maintains angiogenic behavior and shows sustained expression of many differentiated functions of endothelium.46,47 Endothelial tube formation assays were performed as detailed in published protocols.29,30 In summary, HEK 293T cells were transfected with the plasmids of interest. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, conditioned media from each transfection condition were collected for endothelial tube formation assays. EA.hy926 endothelial cells were then seeded at 4 × 103 per well of a 96-well tissue culture plate onto the surface of 100-µL polymerized ECM matrix (extracellular matrix from Engelbreth Holm-Swarm mouse sarcoma, BD Biosciences) per well. Then, 100 µL of conditioned media from each transfection condition was then overlaid onto each well of endothelial cells seeded on the ECM matrix. After a 16-h incubation at 37°C, the extent of formation of capillary networks for each condition was photographed under an inverted light microscope at 100x magnification. Quantification of capillary network formation was done by measurement of total tube length per well using ImageJ image data analysis software.
Fertilized chicken eggs (Ijtsma Farms, Airdire, Alberta) were incubated at 37°C under conditions of constant humidity. CAM assays were conducted as described previously.31 On embryonic day 4, the fertilized chicken eggs were cracked, and chick embryos with intact yolks were placed into 100 × 20-mm culture dishes and returned to incubation. On embryonic day 6, 3 × 105 HEK 293T cells from each transfection condition were loaded onto 5-mm3 gelatin sponges (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) and implanted onto the surface of the developing CAM eggs. The CAM eggs were then returned to incubation. On embryonic day 8, CAM vasculature was digitally photographed. Quantitation of angiogenesis was done by measuring length of vasculature per 707 mm2 field, using ImageJ image data analysis software. Four fields per CAM were measured for 9 CAMs per transfection condition.
The authors are grateful to Stephen Lee for the Flag-VHL-GFP expression vector, Roland Wenger for the HREx3-Luc reporter plasmid, Joan Brugge for the anti-Src 327 monoclonal hybridoma, Steve Robbins for 4G10 antibody, and Cora-Jean S. Edgell for the EA.hy926 endothelial cell line. They are grateful to Shirin Bonni, Marvin Fritzler, Dallan Young, Michael Ohh, Derek Smith, and Kamala Patel for helpful discussions. They also thank Laura Robson and Rebecca Leong-Quong for their technical assistance.
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
This work was supported by grants to DJF from the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (Prairies/Northwest Territories Chapter), the Alberta Cancer Board, the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Supplementary material for this article is available on the Genes & Cancer Web site (http://ganc.sagepub.com/supplemental).