PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Biomaterials. Author manuscript; available in PMC Feb 1, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3012961
NIHMSID: NIHMS252686
Human Ferritin Cages for Imaging Vascular Macrophages
Masahiro Terashima,1 Masaki Uchida,2 Hisanori Kosuge,1 Philip S. Tsao,1 Mark J. Young,3 Steven M. Conolly,4 Trevor Douglas,2 and Michael V. McConnell1*
1 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
2 Department of Chemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
3 Department of Plant Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
4 Bioengineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
* Correspondence to: Michael V. McConnell, MD, MSEE, Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, H2157, Stanford, CA 94305-5233, USA, Tel. (650) 723-7476, Fax: (650) 724-4034, mcconnell/at/stanford.edu
Atherosclerosis is a leading cause of death worldwide. Macrophages are key components of vascular inflammation, which contributes to the development and complications of atherosclerosis. Ferritin, an iron storage and transport protein, has been found to accumulate in macrophages in human atherosclerotic plaques. We hypothesized that ferritin could serve as an intrinsic nano-platform to target delivery of imaging agents to vascular macrophages to detect high-risk atherosclerotic plaques. Here we show that engineered human ferritin protein cages, either conjugated to the fluorescent Cy5.5 molecule or encapsulating a magnetite nanoparticle, are taken up in vivo by macrophages in murine atherosclerotic carotid arteries and can be imaged by fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging. These results indicate that human ferritin can serve as a nanoparticle platform to image vascular inflammation in vivo.
Keywords: nanoparticle, inflammation, macrophage, ferritin, atherosclerosis, molecular imaging
Accumulating evidence has established that inflammation plays an important role in atherosclerosis[1, 2], a leading cause of death worldwide. Inflammation is involved not only in the initiation of atherosclerosis but also its progression and complications. Thus, visualizing inflammation within the vessel wall may help to detect atherosclerosis, characterize its biological activity, and predict risk. Current clinical atherosclerosis imaging methods can visualize vessel stenosis and plaque, but offer limited information regarding the underlying biology within the vessel wall. Emerging molecular and cellular imaging techniques have the potential to provide functional and biological information on the pathobiology of atherosclerosis[310].
A variety of nanomaterials has been used for molecular and cellular imaging of cardiovascular disease[11]. We and others have previously shown that protein cage architectures, such as virus capsids[1216], ferritins[1719] and heat shock proteins[20, 21] are useful templates for loading and/or synthesis of imaging agents within the interior cavity of the protein cages. Importantly, it has been reported that one of these protein cages - ferritin, an iron storage and transport protein - accumulates in human plaque macrophages[2224], and is also postulated to undergo receptor-mediated uptake in inflammatory cells[2527]. We and others have reported that engineered human ferritin is taken up by macrophages in vitro[19, 28]. These findings imply that ferritin may serve as an intrinsic vehicle for targeting plaque macrophages. The present study tested the hypothesis that modified ferritin cages can be used as fluorescence or MR imaging agents for in vivo detection of vascular macrophages.
2. 1. Preparation of Cy5.5 labeled HFn (HFn-Cy5.5) and Magnetite mineralized HFn (HFn-Fe3O4)
The apoferritin (iron-free ferritin) shell is assembled from 24 polypeptide chains of 2 species, the heavy (H) subunit and light (L) subunits[29, 30]. Based on our prior work[19], we used a recombinant ferritin cage composed of 100% H subunit (HFn) as the platform for all experiments. Recombinant HFn was expressed and purified from E. coli, as previously described[19]. For fluorescence imaging, Cy5.5 mono NHS ester (GE Healthcare UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK) was conjugated with HFn (1mg/mL in Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS)), adjusted to pH8.2. The HFn solution was mixed with Cy5.5-NHS in a concentration of 7.2–480 molar equivalents per cage (0.3–20 per subunit) at room temperature for 1 h followed by overnight incubation at 4°C. The samples were purified by size exclusion chromatography in DPBS at pH7.4 to remove free Cy5.5 dye. To quantify the amount of Cy5.5 dye covalently attached to HFn, the samples were analyzed by UV-Vis spectroscopy (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The normalized Cy5.5 absorbance spectrum was subtracted from the Cy conjugated HFn spectrum, and the protein concentration was calculated from absorbance at 280nm of the difference spectrum (HFn subunit ε = 21.09 mM−1cm−1). The concentration of Cy5.5 covalently attached to HFn was calculated from the absorbance maximum near 675nm using a value of ε = 250mM−1cm−1 as per the supplier. Fluorescence emission spectra of the Cy5.5 labeled HFn samples were analyzed with a fluorescence spectrometer (TECAN). For MRI, HFn nanoparticles were mineralized with magnetite at loading factors of 3000Fe-5000Fe per cage, giving R2 values of 31–93 mM−1s−1 as described previously[19].
2. 2. Animals
The overall experimental procedure is shown in Figure 1. Macrophage-rich vascular lesions were induced in 30 FVB strain mice by the following protocol. Mice were fed a high-fat diet containing 40% kcal fat, 1.25% (by weight) cholesterol and 0.5% (by weight) sodium cholate (D12109, Research Diets, Inc. New Brunswick, NJ, USA)[31]. After 4 weeks of high-fat diet, mice were rendered diabetic by administration of 5 daily intraperitoneal injections of streptozotocin (STZ), 40 mg/kg in citrate buffers (0.05 mol/L, PH4.5, Sigma-Aldrich)[32]. At day 5 of the STZ injections, serum glucose was measured from tail vein blood using a glucometer. If the glucose level was below 200 mg/dL, animals were injected with additional STZ for 3 consecutive days. At day 14 after initiation of STZ injection, the left common carotid artery was ligated (n=21) below the bifurcation with the use of 5-0 silk ligature (Ethicon) under 2% inhaled isoflurane as previously described[33]. In sham-operated animals (n=9), the suture was put around the exposed left carotid artery but not tightened. The wound was closed by suture and the animals were allowed to recover on a warming blanket. All procedures were approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care at Stanford University.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall experimental procedure
2. 3. Uptake and Fluorescence Imaging of HFn-Cy5.5
HFn-Cy5.5 was studied in 14 mice (11 ligated, 3 sham). Two weeks after carotid ligation, animals received intravenous HFn-Cy5.5 (8 nmol of Cy5.5/mouse) via retro-orbital injection. Under inhalational anesthesia (2% isoflurane), all mice were imaged at 48 hours including in situ and ex vivo fluorescence imaging using the Maestro in-vivo imaging system (CRi, Woburn, MA), which has the capability to separate fluorochromes from autofluorescence based on multispectral analysis[34]. For in situ fluorescence imaging, animals were euthanized and left and right carotid arteries were surgically exposed and imaged. Then, the carotid arteries and heart were carefully removed en bloc for ex vivo fluorescence imaging.
2. 4. Uptake and MR Imaging of HFn-Fe3O4
HFn-Fe3O4 was studied in 16 mice (10 ligated and 6 sham). Two weeks after carotid ligation, animals received intravenous injection of HFn-Fe3O4 (25mgFe/kg). The initial 8 mice (5 ligated and 3 sham) were analyzed by histology only (see methods below) to verify HFn-Fe3O4 uptake in the carotid lesion. The next 8 mice (5 ligated and 3 sham) also underwent in vivo MRI under inhalational anesthesia (2% isoflurane) on a warming pad to maintain temperature of 37°C. A horizontal-bore 7T scanner was used (self-shielded 30cm bore magnet, Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA), which was equipped with an 6 cm inner-diameter radiofrequency transmit-receive coil (built in house), a 9cm bore gradient insert (770mT/m and 2500T/m/s, Resonance Research, Inc. Billerica, MA) and the GE “Micro-Signa” software environment (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). To detect the T2* effects of the HFn-Fe3O4, bright-blood images of the neck were acquired using a gradient echo sequence (TR/TE=50/4.2, slice thickness=0.5mm, FOV=3cm, matrix=256×256, FA=50, acquisition time=9min 55sec). MRI was performed 1 hr prior to HFn-Fe3O4 injection and then 24 and 48hrs after HFn-Fe3O4 injection. The slice position was matched using the aortic arch as reference point.
2. 5. Fluorescence and MR Image Analysis
For in situ fluorescence imaging, ROIs were placed on the left and right carotid regions, calculating average signal intensity divided by exposure time. For ex vivo fluorescence imaging, surrounding tissue had been removed, so the ROIs were placed around the entire left or right carotid artery and total signal intensity divided by exposure time was used.
For in vivo MRI, the effect of HFn-Fe3O4 accumulation in the carotid wall was assessed by measuring the T2*-induced signal loss on the carotid lumen images. Specifically, the % reduction in carotid lumen size post-HFn-Fe3O4 was measured:
equation M1
2. 6. Histology
Carotid arteries were cut into three 2-mm sections and frozen in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA) for histopathological analysis. Tissue samples were then cut into serial sections 5μm thick. For basic histology, sections were fixed with 10% formalin for 1 hour and then underwent hematoxylin and eosin or Perl’s iron staining (for detecting HFn-Fe3O4). For immunohistochemistry, sections were fixed in acetone for 10 minutes at 4°C and incubated with 10% normal rabbit serum for 30 minutes at room temperature to reduce nonspecific binding. After these sections were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), they were incubated with anti-Mac3 antibody for macrophage detection (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) overnight at 4°C. Sections were then incubated with biotinylated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 30 minutes. Antigen-antibody conjugates were detected with avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase complex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole as chromogen. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. For immunofluorescence double staining, sections were stained with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rat IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at room temperature for 2 hours. Sections were observed under confocal microscopy.
2. 7. Statistical Analysis
Fluorescence signal intensity and % signal loss on MRI were compared between left (ligated) and right (control) carotid arteries by Student’s t-test. In addition, the % lumen loss on MRI for pre- vs. post-HFn-Fe3O4 time points was analyzed by one-way repeated measures ANOVA. All statistical analysis was performed by Statview (version 5, SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC).
3. 1. Characterization of Cy5.5-labeled HFn (HFn-Cy5.5) and Magnetite-incorporated HFn (HFn-Fe)
Reactivity of the Cy5.5 mono NHS ester with HFn (HFn-Cy5.5) was assessed over a range of stoichiometric ratios of Cy5.5 per HFn cage. The number of Cy5.5 dye covalently attached to the HFn increased with increasing input ratios of Cy5.5 per HFn cage (Fig. 2a). The number of bound Cy5.5 was determined to be 1.2 Cy/cage, 4.0 Cy/cage, and 14.6 Cy/cage when the input molar ratio of Cy/cage was 7.2, 24 and 480, respectively. Fluorescence emission measurements of HFn-Cy5.5 with various Cy/HFn cage ratios at equivalent Cy5.5 concentration (2 μM) revealed that the emission intensity at 690nm gradually decreased with increasing the number of Cy dye attached to the cage (Fig. 2b), likely due to self-quenching of the fluorophore. When the fluorescence emission intensity was compared under the same HFn cage concentration (0.3mg/mL), the HFn-Cy5.5 with input Cy/cage = 24 exhibited the highest intensity whereas HFn-Cy5.5 with Cy/cage = 7.2 showed much lower fluorescence intensity per HFn (Fig. 2c). Therefore, the HFn-Cy5.5 with input Cy/cage = 24 was used for the in vivo experiments. Importantly, size exclusion chromatography of HFn-Cy5.5 showed almost identical elution volume with the unmodified HFn (Fig. 3a, b). Co-elution of the HFn protein (280nm) and Cy5.5 dye (675nm) indicates a single species consistent with the covalent attachment of Cy5.5 dye to the HFn (Fig. 3b). In addition, TEM images of the intact HFn and HFn-Cy5.5 both revealed cage-like particles of about 12nm in diameter. These results clearly suggest Cy5.5 labeling has no effect on the quaternary structure or overall cage-like morphology of the HFn.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fluorescence characterization of HFn-Cy5.5
Figure 3
Figure 3
Size characterization of HFn-Cy5.5 and HFn-Fe3O4
Similarly, size exclusion chromatography of the Fe3O4 mineralized HFn (HFn-Fe3O4), which was prepared as described previously[19], showed co-elution of the protein (280nm) and the iron oxide (410nm) components (Fig. 3c), demonstrating the composite nature of the HFn and magnetite. Unstained TEM of HFn-Fe3O4 showed electron dense nanoparticles of about 6 nm in diameter (5000Fe/cage), which formed within the interior cavity of the cage (Fig. 3c). We have shown previously that the particles are primarily magnetite (or maghemite) and that HFn-Fe3O4 exhibits much higher R1 and R2 relaxivities compared to endogenous ferritin and comparable to those of commercially available iron oxide contrast agents[19].
3. 2. Fluorescence Imaging of HFn-Cy5.5 in Vascular Lesions
After intravenous injection of HFn-Cy5.5, both in situ and ex vivo fluorescence imaging clearly showed high signal localized to the macrophage-rich (ligated) left carotid artery and not the control (non-ligated) right carotid artery (Fig. 4a,b). Importantly, sham-operated mice did not show significant signal in either left or right carotid arteries (Fig. 4c, d). Quantitative analysis (Fig. 4e, f) showed that the fluorescent signal was significantly higher in the ligated left carotid arteries compared to contralateral right carotid artery and sham controls, both in situ (p<0.04) and ex vivo (p<0.002). Histology of the vessel wall demonstrated macrophage infiltration in both the neointima and adventitia of the ligated left carotid artery (Fig. 5), while no macrophage infiltration was observed in the control (non-ligated) right carotid artery. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that HFn-Cy5.5 (red signal) co-localized with macrophages (green signal) in merged images of confocal fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5). These results demonstrate selective accumulation of HFn in macrophage-rich vascular lesions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
In situ and ex vivo fluorescence images of HFn-Cy5.5 nanoparticles in mouse carotid arteries
Figure 5
Figure 5
Colocalization of HFn-Cy5.5 with macrophages by fluorescence microscopy
3. 3. In vivo MRI of Atherosclerosis with HFn-Fe
In vivo MRI of mouse carotids showed that the T2* signal loss effect of HFn-Fe3O4 caused a reduction of the carotid lumen signal post contrast (Fig. 6). Both 24 and 48 hours after intravenous injection of HFn-Fe3O4, the T2*-sensitive bright-blood MRI images showed concentric signal loss, which reduced the measured size of the carotid lumen cross-sectional area compared to pre-contrast images [note that the pre-contrast left carotid artery lumen size started off smaller than non-ligated controls, as expected, due to the ligation two weeks prior]. By quantitative analysis (Fig. 6c), the T2*-induced reduction in lumen size post-HFn-Fe3O4 was significant at both 24 and 48 hours (p<0.005 vs. pre, p<0.003 ligation vs. sham). Importantly, no T2* effect was seen in the contralateral control or sham-operated carotid arteries, showing specificity of HFn-Fe3O4 for the inflammatory lesion. Histological evaluation of HFn-Fe3O4 accumulation showed similar results to HFn-Cy5.5, as blue iron staining was observed in the neointima of the ligated left carotid arteries (Fig. 7a), but not in the contralateral control or sham arteries (Fig. 7b, c). These results further demonstrate that chemically modified HFn, now with an MR imaging agent, accumulated in plaque macrophages in vivo and could be detected by noninvasive imaging.
Figure 6
Figure 6
In vivo MRI of carotid arteries in ligated and sham-operated mice with HFn-Fe3O4
Figure 7
Figure 7
HFn-Fe3O4 localization in the neointima of ligated carotid arteries
We have shown that modified human ferritin nanoparticles can image vascular macrophages in vivo in murine carotid arteries through fluorescence or MRI. Thus, an intrinsic cage-like human protein can be used for in vivo macrophage and vascular imaging.
Previous animal and human studies have shown an increase in ferritin in atherosclerotic plaques, mainly in macrophages, and association with plaque rupture[2224]. Increased ferritin in atherosclerotic lesions has also been associated with pro-inflammatory cytokines and atheroma cell apoptosis[2224]. The heavy (H) subunit of ferritin is generally believed to play a key role in iron transport[29, 30] and several investigators have also found evidence for receptor-mediated uptake of ferritin, especially the H subunit studied here, by inflammatory and other cell types[2527]. While we and others have previously shown good uptake of modified HFn in macrophages in vitro[19, 28], the full mechanisms for increased ferritin accumulation in macrophages in vivo, particularly in human atherosclerotic lesions, are not fully understood. The important finding in this study is that HFn accumulates in vascular macrophages in vivo and may serve as an intrinsic macrophage imaging agent without additional macrophage targeting moieties.
A number of molecular imaging strategies have been developed for detecting macrophages in atherosclerosis, such as MRI[5, 6, 10], fluorescence imaging[7, 35], and nuclear imaging (PET and SPECT)[9, 36]. In our study, fluorescence imaging had insufficient signal penetration to allow fully noninvasive detection, requiring in situ carotid exposure. A more sensitive fluorescence imaging technique, such as fluorescence molecular tomography, may allow fully noninvasive imaging[37]. MRI allowed noninvasive detection, but relies on T2* signal loss, which can be challenging. The application of “positive contrast” methods to high-field small-animal MRI systems for iron detection may be advantageous[6, 38].
While HFn has the advantage of being a modified human protein, the clinical translation of this approach from a short-term animal model to the chronic, complex human disease certainly requires further study. The cage-like structure of HFn also makes it a highly adaptable platform for imparting targeting and therapeutic capabilities to optimize further its “theranostic” potential[18, 39].
5. Conclusions
We have shown that human ferritin, an iron storage and transport protein found in inflamed human atherosclerotic plaques, can be engineered as a vascular macrophage imaging contrast agent. Human ferritin protein cages, either conjugated to the fluorescent Cy5.5 molecule or encapsulating a magnetite nanoparticle, were taken up in vivo by macrophages in murine atherosclerotic carotid arteries and imaged using fluorescence and MRI. These results indicate that human ferritin can serve as a nanoparticle platform to image vascular inflammation in vivo.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Tim Doyle, Laura Pisani, and Shay Keren for their technical assistance with small animal fluorescence imaging and MRI.
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health, R01-HL078678 (Dr. McConnell) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, R21-EB005364 (Dr. Douglas).
Footnotes
Disclosures
Dr. McConnell receives research support from GE Healthcare and is on a scientific advisory board for Kowa, Inc. Dr. Terashima has received honoraria from FujiFilm and Philips Japan. These companies did not fund this study and had no involvement in study design, data analysis, or manuscript writing. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002;420(6917):868–74. [PubMed]
2. Weber C, Zernecke A, Libby P. The multifaceted contributions of leukocyte subsets to atherosclerosis: lessons from mouse models. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(10):802–15. [PubMed]
3. Osborn EA, Jaffer FA. Advances in molecular imaging of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008;23(6):620–8. [PubMed]
4. Jaffer FA, Weissleder R. Molecular imaging in the clinical arena. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293(7):855–62. [PubMed]
5. Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik DE, Weissleder R. MR-optical imaging of cardiovascular molecular targets. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008;103(2):87–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Korosoglou G, Weiss RG, Kedziorek DA, Walczak P, Gilson WD, Schar M, et al. Noninvasive detection of macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaque in hyperlipidemic rabbits using “positive contrast” magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(6):483–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Deguchi J, Aikawa M, Tung CH, Aikawa E, Kim DE, Ntziachristos V, et al. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: visualizing matrix metalloproteinase action in macrophages in vivo. Circulation. 2006;114(1):55–62. [PubMed]
8. Kaufmann BA, Sanders JM, Davis C, Xie A, Aldred P, Sarembock IJ, et al. Molecular imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis with targeted ultrasound detection of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Circulation. 2007;116(3):276–84. [PubMed]
9. Tahara N, Kai H, Yamagishi S, Mizoguchi M, Nakaura H, Ishibashi M, et al. Vascular inflammation evaluated by [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is associated with the metabolic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(14):1533–9. [PubMed]
10. Rudd JH, Hyafil F, Fayad ZA. Inflammation imaging in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(7):1009–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Yang XM. Nano- and microparticle-based imaging of cardiovascular interventions: overview. Radiology. 2007;243(2):340–7. [PubMed]
12. Allen M, Bulte JWM, Liepold L, Basu G, Zywicke HA, Frank JA, et al. Paramagnetic viral nanoparticles as potential high-relaxivity magnetic resonance contrast agents. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54(4):807–12. [PubMed]
13. Liepold L, Anderson S, Willits D, Oltrogge L, Frank JA, Douglas T, et al. Viral capcids as MRI contrast agents. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:871–9. [PubMed]
14. Hooker JM, Datta A, Botta M, Raymond KN, Francis MB. Magnetic resonance contrast agents from viral capsid shells: a comparison of exterior and interior cargo strategies. Nano Lett. 2007;7(8):2207–10. [PubMed]
15. Anderson EA, Isaacman S, Peabody DS, Wang EY, Canary JW, Kirshenbaum K. Viral nanoparticles donning a paramagnetic coat: conjugation of MRI contrast agents to the MS2 capsid. Nano Lett. 2006;6(6):1160–4. [PubMed]
16. Lewis JD, Destito G, Zijlstra A, Gonzalez MJ, Quigley JP, Manchester M, et al. Viral nanoparticles as tools for intravital vascular imaging. Nat Med. 2006;12(3):354–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Aime S, Frullano L, Crich SG. Compartmentalization of a gadolinium complex in the apoferritin cavity: A route to obtain high relaxivity contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41(6):1017–9. [PubMed]
18. Uchida M, Flenniken ML, Allen M, Willits DA, Crowley BE, Brumfield S, et al. Targeting of cancer cells with ferrimagnetic ferritin cage nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128(51):16626–33. [PubMed]
19. Uchida M, Terashima M, Cunningham CH, Suzuki Y, Willits DA, Willis AF, et al. A human ferritin iron oxide nano-composite magnetic resonance contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(5):1073–81. [PubMed]
20. Flenniken ML, Willits DA, Brumfield S, Young M, Douglas T. The small heat shock protein cage from methanococcus jannaschii is a versatile nanoscale platform for genetic and chemical modification. Nano Lett. 2003;3(11):1573–6.
21. Liepold LO, Abedin MJ, Buckhouse ED, Frank JA, Young MJ, Douglas T. Supramolecular protein cage composite MR contrast agents with extremely efficient relaxivity properties. Nano Lett. 2009;9(12):4520–6. [PubMed]
22. Pang JHS, Jiang MJ, Chen YL, Wang FW, Wang DL, Chu SH, et al. Increased ferritin gene expression in atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(10):2204–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Yuan XM. Apoptotic macrophage-derived foam cells of human atheromas are rich in iron and ferritin, suggesting iron-catalysed reactions to be involved in apoptosis. Free Radic Res. 1999;30(3):221–31. [PubMed]
24. Li W, Xu LH, Forssell C, Sullivan JL, Yuan XM. Overexpression of transferrin receptor and ferritin related to clinical symptoms and destabilization of human carotid plaques. Exp Biol Med. 2008;233(7):818–26. [PubMed]
25. Recalcati S, Invernizzi P, Arosio P, Cairo G. New functions for an iron storage protein: The role of ferritin in immunity and autoimmunity. J Autoimmun. 2008;30(1–2):84–9. [PubMed]
26. Fisher J, Devraj K, Ingram J, Slagle-Webb B, Madhankumar AB, Liu X, et al. Ferritin: a novel mechanism for delivery of iron to the brain and other organs. Am J Physiol-Cell Physiol. 2007;293(2):C641–C9. [PubMed]
27. Todorich B, Zhang XS, Slagle-Webb B, Seaman WE, Connor JR. Tim-2 is the receptor for H-ferritin on oligodendrocytes. J Neurochem. 2008;107(6):1495–505. [PubMed]
28. Sawyer RT, Day BJ, Fadok VA, Chiarappa-Zucca M, Maier LA, Fontenot AP, et al. Beryllium-ferritin: lymphocyte proliferation and macrophage apoptosis in chronic beryllium disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;31(4):470–7. [PubMed]
29. Theil EC. Ferritin: structure, gene regulation, and cellular function in animals, plants, and microorganisms. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:289–315. [PubMed]
30. Harrison PM, Arosio P. Ferritins: molecular properties, iron storage function and cellular regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1275(3):161–203. [PubMed]
31. Lichtman AH, Clinton SK, Iiyama K, Connelly PW, Libby P, Cybulsky MI. Hyperlipidemia and atherosclerotic lesion development in LDL receptor-deficient mice fed defined semipurified diets with and without cholate. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19(8):1938–44. [PubMed]
32. Like AA, Rossini AA. Streptozotocin-induced pancreatic insulitis: new model of diabetes mellitus. Science. 1976;193(4251):415–7. [PubMed]
33. Kumar A, Lindner V. Remodeling with neointima formation in the mouse carotid artery after cessation of blood flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17(10):2238–44. [PubMed]
34. Levenson RM, Mansfield JR. Multispectral imaging in biology and medicine: slices of life. Cytometry A. 2006;69A(8):748–58. [PubMed]
35. Waldeck J, Hager F, Holtke C, Lanckohr C, von Wallbrunn A, Torsello G, et al. Fluorescence reflectance imaging of macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaques using an alpha(v)beta(3) integrin-targeted fluorochrome. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(11):1845–51. [PubMed]
36. Nahrendorf M, Zhang HW, Hembrador S, Panizzi P, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, et al. Nanoparticle PET-CT imaging of macrophages in inflammatory atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2008;117(3):379–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Ntziachristos V, Ripoll J, Wang LHV, Weissleder R. Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging. Nat Biotech. 2005;23(3):313–20. [PubMed]
38. Cunningham CH, Arai T, Yang PC, McConnell MV, Pauly JM, Conolly SM. Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53(5):999–1005. [PubMed]
39. Pan D, Caruthers SD, Hu G, Senpan A, Scott MJ, Gaffney PJ, et al. Ligand-directed nanobialys as theranostic agent for drug delivery and manganese-based magnetic resonance imaging of vascular targets. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(29):9186–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]