PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Ann N Y Acad Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3010261
NIHMSID: NIHMS240016

Clues to immune tolerance: The monogenic autoimmune syndromes

Abstract

Autoimmune disease affects a significant proportion of the population. The etiology of most autoimmune diseases is largely unknown, but it is thought to be multifactorial with both environmental and genetic influences. Rare monogenic autoimmune diseases, however, offer an invaluable window into potential disease mechanisms. In this review, we will discuss the autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (APS1), the immunedysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX), and autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS). Significantly, the information gained from the study of these diseases has provided new insights into more common autoimmune disease and have yielded new diagnostics and therapeutic opportunities.

Keywords: IPEX, ALPS, APS1, autoimmunity, immune tolerance

Introduction

Autoimmune disease results from a breakdown in the mechanisms that maintain tolerance to self tissues. The exact cause of most autoimmune diseases is unknown and is thought to be due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The multifactorial nature of autoimmune diseases has made it difficult to determine their underlying pathogenesis. Genome-wide association studies have yielded correlations between multiple small nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and autoimmune diseases. However, for most of the associated loci, the signals are not strong enough to directly implicate a specific gene, and the role of the candidate genes in a particular locus can only be speculated.1 The loci that have been potentially linked with autoimmune diseases involve genes that regulate many aspects of the immune system including lymphocyte activation, microbial recognition, cytokines and cytokines receptors. Moreover, many of these gene variants are associated with multiple autoimmune diseases.2 For example, similar major histocompatibility locus (MHC) haplotypes have been linked to multiple autoimmune disorders and SNPs in the protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor gene, PTPN22, have been connected to rheumatoid arthritis, type I diabetes, and Crohn's disease. Although polymorphisms in the MHC and PTPN22 have been linked to autoimmune disease a direct genotype to phenotype correlation is lacking.12 In contrast, studies with rare monogenic autoimmune diseases have yielded invaluable insights into the underlying mechanisms of immune tolerance because of their strong penetrance.

Here we highlight a handful of disorders including the autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (APS) type I (OMIM 240300) also know as autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED); the immunedysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome (OMIM 304790); and autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) (OMIM 601859) (Table I). Studies of these disorders have advanced our knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of autoimmunity, and how the breakdown of tolerance can lead to autoimmune disease. In this review, we will cover the clinical manifestations, genetics, diagnosis/treatment and in-depth pathophysiology of these disorders.

Table I
Major Characteristics of Monogenic Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type I

APS1 clinical features

APS1 is a rare disease that usually manifests in childhood. The clinical diagnosis of APS1 is based on the presence of at least 2 of 3 major features: mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC), adrenal insufficiency, or hypoparathyroidism, with the most common presenting symptom being mucocutaneous candidiasis in infancy (Table 1).3 In a Finnish cohort of patients with APS1, 50% of patient's had developed CMC by age 5, 70% by age 10, and 94% by age 20.4 The infection usually begins in the mouth, but may spread to other regions of the GI tract including the esophagus, vagina, stomach, and intestines. The severity of the mucositis caused by CMC infection varies greatly with some patients having only minor buccal redness and ulcerations to other patients developing esophageal strictures. Patients with CMC are at increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and require periodic screening.5

Hypoparathyroidism is the second most common manifestation of APS1. In a Finnish cohort the prevalence was 33% by age 5, 66% at age 10 and 85% at age 30.4 Interestingly, if patients develop adrenal insufficiency prior to hypoparathyroidism they are somewhat protected from subsequently developing hypoparathyroidism.6 Clinically, hypoparathyroidism has a wide range of symptoms from muscle cramps and paresthesia to frank seizures secondary to very low serum calcium levels. Adrenal insufficiency is the third most common manifestation with 40% of Finnish patients showing symptoms by age 10 and 78% of patients symptomatic at age 30.4 Symptoms of hypoadrenalism include fatigue, salt craving, hypotension, weight loss and increased skin pigmentation and arise due to loss of adrenocortical dysfunction.

APS1 can have multiple other associated autoimmune manifestations including autoimmune hepatitis, type I diabetes, keratitis, autoimmune gonadal failure, pernicious anemia, interstitial lung disease, or celiac disease to name a few.3,7 These manifestations can vary widely in APS1 patients and overall show low penetrance. Additionally, patients with APS1 may have enamel dysplasia or other signs of ectodermal dystrophy.78 Among patients with APS1 there is great variability in the timing of the disease. In the Finnish cohort, the youngest patient presented at 2 months and the oldest at 18 years, while in a Norwegian cohort, the youngest patient presented at a few months of age and the oldest at 43.4,9 To further complicate the diagnosis, some patients will suffer from the less common disease manifestations before presenting with the major disease-defining manifestations.4,7 There are reports of APS1 patients manifesting symptoms such as chronic diarrhea, fevers, periodic rash, or autoimmune hepatitis for several years before displaying clinical features of the diagnostic triad.

The heterogeneous nature of disease manifestations and the significant associated morbidity and mortality, make it imperative that APS1 patients are followed closely by experienced providers. Treatment of APS1 depends largely on the organ-specific manifestations. CMC in APS1 is treated with antifungals and replacement therapy is used to treat endocrinopathies, with cortisol and fludrocortisone given for adrenal insufficiency and calcium and vitamin D replacement for hypoparathyroidism.3 Immunosuppression is used for some APS1 disease manifestations such as autoimmune hepatitis, however, immunosuppression is not widely used for all patients with APS1.3

APS1 genetics

APS1 is a rare monogenic disorder with increased frequency in certain populations including Iranian Jews (1:9000), Sardinians (1:14,000), Finns (1:25,000) and Norwegians (1:90,000).4,911 APS1 exhibits autosomal recessive inheritance with carriers having no consistent phenotype observed to date (see below for further discussion). Because of its monogenic inheritance pattern, classic positional cloning was used to identify the gene defect. In 1997, two groups simultaneously discovered the mutated gene on chromosome 21q22.3 and named it the Autoimmune Regulator (AIRE).1213 Since its initial discovery more than 60 mutations have been found scattered throughout the gene (Figure 1).14 Particular mutations are more common in certain populations with the R257X mutation found among 82% of Finnish patients.4 The 1094-1106del13 is the most abundant mutation in British, Irish, North American, and Norwegian patients while the Y85C mutation is the most common in Iranian Jews.11,15 Notably, two patients with the exact same disease mutation can have very different clinical manifestations indicating a very low genotypic-phenotypic correlation. It may be that other genes or environmental factors are important in the heterogeneity of the APS1 phenotype within families. In fact, two recent studies have identified the human leukocyte antigen locus (HLA) as a disease modifier in APS1.1617

Figure 1
Functional domains of the Aire protein. The N terminus contains both a homogenously staining region (HSR) thought to be involved in dimerization and a nuclear localization sequence. The middle of the Aire protein contains a SAND domain which shows homology ...

In addition to the autosomal recessive form of APS1, there is also a G228W point mutation found in an Italian family that is responsible for a unique autosomal dominant form of APS1.18 The clinical manifestations of the dominant form of the disease are different from the recessive form in that most patients develop autoimmune thyroditis with or without the other clinical characteristics of APS1. In contrast, patients that are heterozygous for other APS1 mutations do not develop the clinical features of APS1, but it remains unclear if they have more subtle phenotypes. For example, one study of heterozygous relatives of patients with APS1 found that approximately 40% of these patients suffered from some other autoimmune manifestation, however, the significance of this is not yet clear.19

APS1 pathogenesis

Mechanisms of tolerance in the thymus

After discovery that AIRE gene mutations were the cause of APS1 in humans, the mouse homologue was identified and inactivated by several groups allowing further insight into Aire function.2021 Aire deficient mice are similar to humans with APS1 in that they develop multi-organ autoimmunity with inflammatory infiltrates and elevated serum autoantibodies. Studies in mice revealed that Aire is predominantly expressed in the thymus and to a lesser extent in secondary lymphoid organs.20 Within the thymus, Aire is found exclusively in medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs).22 Aire localization within the thymus is interesting as the thymus has previously been shown to be the site of negative selection of autoreactive thymocytes.23 Negative selection is the process by which thymocytes with T cell receptors (TCRs) specific for self-antigens are deleted (Figure 2). Moreover, experiments with mTECs revealed that they express a wide-array of tissue restricted antigens (TRAs) including insulin and thyroglobulin.22 TRAs are proteins whose expression is predominantly found in one tissue and whose expression outside that tissue would be unusual. An example of such a TRA is insulin whose expression is mainly restricted to the β cells of the pancreatic islet. The finding of insulin expression in mTECs raised the intriguing possibility that these cells were able to express and present TRAs to developing T cells to cause their deletion. In addition, mTECs were found to express the major histocompatibilty complex (MHC II) as well as the costimulatory molecule CD80 on their surface giving them features of other professional antigen presenting cells.22 The observation of autoimmunity in Aire deficient mice coupled with the predominant expression of Aire in mTECs generated the hypothesis that Aire function may be important in TRA gene expression.

Figure 2
Negative selection of T cells in thymus. Immature T cells (thymocytes) that express T cell receptors (TCRs) specific for tissue restricted antigens (TRAs) are deleted in the thymus in the process of negative selection. The expression of TRAs by medullary ...

Experimental evidence that Aire is important in TRA gene expression came from microarray profiling of mTECs from Aire wildtype and Aire deficient mice. The microarray data revealed that thousands of TRAs were under the control of Aire and that that these genes were absent in Aire deficient mTECs.20 Interestingly, the microarray data also showed that a subset of TRAs, such as CRP and GAD67, were not under Aire control raising the possibility that other Aire-like factors may exist.24 Furthermore, TRAs under the control of Aire are enriched in organ-specific self-antigens, perhaps explaining why APS1 patients develop organ specific autoimmunity.2527 For example, Interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein, IRBP, has been shown to be the TRA important in preventing eye infiltration in Aire knockout mice. Interestingly, loss of IRBP in the thymus results in eye autoimmunity, indicating that loss of one antigen is sufficient to result in disease.25

The most accepted mechanism by which Aire-induced TRA expression prevents autoimmunity is to promote the negative selection of autoreactive T cells in the thymus (Figure 2). Several groups have confirmed this process by expressing ectopic antigens driven by TRA specific promoters and demonstrating the deletion of T cells specific for neo-self antigen occurs only in the presence of wildtype Aire and fails to occur in Aire deficient mice.20,28 These results indicate that in the absence of Aire-mediated expression of TRAs within the thymus T cells will escape deletion and can escape to the periphery to cause autoimmunity.

Extrathymic Aire

Initial studies indicated that Aire transcript is not only expressed in the thymus, but also at low levels in other lymphoid organs including the spleen and lymph nodes.20,29 The expression and function of extrathymic Aire is controversial, however, a recent study utilizing a unique Aire reporter mouse that expresses GFP driven by the Aire promoter has identified GFP+ extrathymic-Aire expressing cells (eTACs) in peripheral lymphoid organs, specifically at the B cell-T cell boundary zone of the lymph node follicle.30 eTACs express nuclear Aire protein by immunofluorescence and were found to be radioresistant stromal cells that were CD45, Class II+, PD-L1 positive. Importantly, a other studies have also identified peripheral Aire expression in CD45stromal cells and also in human lymph nodes.3132 Similar to mTECs, eTACs are able to interact with and delete autoreactive T cells in a transgenic system.30

Of note, microarray profiling of eTACs show that they also express TRAs, but Aire-dependent TRA expression by eTACs shows very little overlap to mTECs.30 The ability of eTACs to delete autoreactive T cells combined with their expression of TRAs indicates that eTACs may be critical mediators of peripheral tolerance. Furthermore, the finding of differential TRA expression in eTACs and mTECs indicates that these cells may be vital in deleting a different array of autoreactive T cells. The importance of eTACs in preventing the disease manifestations seen in APS1 and Aire deficient mice has yet to be fully delineated.

Molecular mechanism of Aire

While Aire is critical for the expression of TRAs, the molecular mechanism it uses to induce TRA gene expression is unknown. The ability of one protein to induce the “promiscuous” transcription of thousands of genes from diverse tissues is remarkable and an area of active research interest. After its initial discovery, Aire was hypothesized to be a transcriptional regulator for several reasons. First, Aire is located in nuclear speckles which are thought to be sites of active transcription.33 Second, the structure of the Aire protein contains many functional domains common to transcriptional regulators.14,3436 The Aire protein contains a SAND domain which shows homology to the DNA binding domain of Sp100 family members.37 Evidence that Aire's SAND domain is a functional DNA-binding domain comes from previous studies using Aire recombinant protein, however this result has been called into question as typical Sp100 proteins bind DNA through a K(D/N)WK motif and Aire does not contain this motif.35,37 Additionally, genomic studies of Aire target genes have failed to find an Aire consensus sequence among the thousands of Aire target genes. In vitro chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments, using transfected Aire have shown Aire to be targeted to the promoters of TRA genes, however it is unclear if Aire binds directly to DNA or is part of a large macromolecular complex.36 These results indicate that Aire may not act as a sequence-specific transcription factor. Additional studies are needed to address this issue and to determine the relevance of Aire-DNA binding in vivo.

One observation noted about Aire regulated genes is that they show clear chromosomal clustering.3839 Due to the fact that the Aire genes are clustered, it may be that Aire uses epigenetic mechanisms to coordinately de-repress and upregulate an entire cluster of genes. This potential mechanism appears to be more complex, however, in that within an Aire-regulated cluster of genes some of Aire's targets are repressed, some are activated, and for some genes within the cluster Aire has no effect at all.4041 For example, the mouse casein locus is expressed in the mouse mammary epithelium and is also a TRA gene cluster expressed in the thymus. In the mouse mammary epithelium, all of the casein locus genes are coordinately upregulated. In the thymus, however, some casein genes within the cluster are upregulated and others are repressed with activated and repressed genes interspersed within the cluster. Furthermore, single cell sorting followed by qPCR on mTECs shows that a given mTEC will only express a few casein genes and that the distribution is random within the locus.4041 This stochastic nature of TRA gene expression within mTECs, in that all mTECs do not uniformly express all TRA genes, argues against Aire functioning simply by globally de-repressing a given cluster of genes and suggests that both gene-specific interactions and other cofactors may be important for Aire's mechanism of action.

Further clues to Aire function come from its known binding partners. Similar to Aire's promiscuous gene regulation, Aire has been shown to bind “promiscuously” to a large number of proteins.42 Recent in vitro studies have shown that the first plant homology domain (PHD1) in the Aire protein binds to an unmethylated form of histone 3(H3K4me0).34,36 Additional experiments showed that Aire binding is methylation sensitive and that Aire does not bind to the methylated form of histone 3 (H3K4me3). The finding that Aire binds to histones in a methylation-sensitive manner is additional evidence that epigenetics may be important in Aire function. Interestingly, H3K4me3 is a global mark of active transcription whereas the H3K4me0 is a mark of repression.43 Thus, Aire may target areas of gene repression and it has been speculated that part of its function may be to change a gene's state from a “repressive” to “active” landscape.44 The importance of a functional PHD domain is highlighted by the fact that disease causing mutations are found in this region.14

Other proteins found to bind Aire indicate a potential function in the transcriptional process. Initial studies showed that Aire binds to P-TEFb (positive transcription factor elongation factor b complex), CBP (CREB-binding protein), and DNA-PK (DNA-dependent protein kinase).4547 Both P-TEFb and CBP have well known functions in transcription with P-TEFb important in transcriptional elongation and CBP a well-characterized transcriptional co-activator. A recent study using large scale immunoprecipitation from Aire-transfected cells followed by mass spectrometry further defined Aire binding partners and identified over 40 proteins that interact with Aire.42 The group proceeded to confirm the binding of a large proportion of these proteins with reciprocal coimmunoprecipitation and the function of each binding partner with RNA interference.

The approximately 40 interacting partners could be divided into four functional groups: chromatin structure, gene transcription, nuclear transport, and RNA processing. In this study, the group focused on further characterizing the function of Aire with regard gene transcription and RNA processing. One complex of Aire binding partners contains DNA-PK (DNA-dependent protein kinase), PARP-1 (poly ADP ribose polymerase 1), FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription), and Ku (binds to DNA_double-strand break ends and is required for the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway of DNA repair). This complex is thought to aid in the transcriptional elongation process by introducing double-stranded breaks into DNA and unwinding DNA to allow access to general transcriptional machinery.48 RNAi knockdown of individual members of the complex was shown to disrupt the expression of TRA genes in 293 cells indicating this complex may have functional importance in gene transcription.

A second complex involves members of the mRNA processing machinery including the splicing factors SFRS and SFRS3, the putative DEAD box helicases DDX5 and DDX17, MYB-binding protein 1a, and poly(A) binding protein C.42 Members of this complex were also knocked out in 293 cells and were found to be important in Aire mediated TRA gene expression. Interestingly, the group went on to show that Aire was important in mediating mRNA processing by showing selective upregulation by Aire of spliced mRNA, but not pre-mRNA in wild-type mTECS but not in Aire deficient mTECs. This result is in contrast to the role of other classic transcription factors such as Foxp3 which are important for the transcription of pre-mRNA.42 The finding that Aire does not affect pre-mRNA levels and only affects spliced mRNA raises questions about Aire's role in the general transcriptional process. Specifically, why does Aire bind to factors such as DNA-PK that are thought to be involved in transcriptional elongation if Aire does not affect pre-mRNA and only affects RNA splicing? It may be that Aire has an affect on transcriptional elongation that is beyond our level of detection. Further work needs to be done to characterize the mechanisms of action of these diverse binding proteins with regard to Aire-mediated TRA gene expression.

Novel autoantigens in APS1 – aides in diagnosis

The definitive diagnosis of APS1 can be met if an individual meets one of the following three criteria: 1) presence of at least two of the major components chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, hypoparathyroidism, or adrenal insufficiency, 2) one major component and a sibling with a definitive diagnosis, or 3) AIRE mutations in both genes. APS1 patients also develop autoantibodies which can both aid in diagnosis and also give insights into disease pathogenesis. For example, multiple independent groups found autoantibodies to type I interferons in the sera of APS1 patients with the correlation between APS1 and autoantibodies to type I interferons close to 100%.4950 The specific interferon subtypes that APS1 patients have reactivity to include interferon alpha and/or interferon omega. Patients with the G228W mutation also produce autoantibodies to type I interferons, potentially making them a useful diagnostic tool for all forms of the disease.49 The major in vivo function of type I interferons is thought to be in protection from viral infections, however, APS1 patients do not show increased susceptibility to viral infections. Thus, the clinical relevance of type I interferon autoantibodies, other than as a diagnostic maker, is unclear.

In addition to autoantibodies against Type I interferons, a recent set of studies have discovered autoantibodies that may explain the susceptibility to candida infection in patients with APS1. A consortium of researchers has discovered autoantibodies to T helper 17 (Th17) cytokines specifically IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 in sera from APS1 patients.5152 The Th17 subset of T cells is thought to be important for host protection against fungi at epithelial surfaces. Thus, these studies have proposed that the CMC seen in APS1 patients is secondary to autoantibodies targeting these cytokines. While the data shows a significant correlation between autoantibodies to Th17 cytokines and CMC, further study needs to be performed to directly link a Th17 defect to CMC.

Another study, using sera from APS1 patients with hypoparathroidism identified the parathyroid specific protein NALP5 (NACHT leucine-rich repeat protein 5) as a putative parathyroid autoantigen.53 Autoantibodies to NALP5 are specifically found in APS1 patients with hypoparathyroidism making the autoantibody response to NALP5 a potential diagnostic marker for hypoparathyroidism in these patients. With regard to adrenal insufficiency, APS1 patients also have autoantibodies to P450-containing enzymes that are important in steroid biosynthesis. Similar to patients with isolated autoimmune adrenal insufficiency (Addison's disease), APS1 patients have autoantibodies to 21-hydroxylase (a key enzyme in adrenal steroid biogenesis).3 In addition, APS1 patients with adrenal sufficiency can also have autoantibodies to other enzymes involved in steroid biogenesis such as side-chain cleavage enzyme and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase.5455

Research is currently underway to identify novel autoantibodies that could be used to help diagnose specific APS1 clinical manifestations or potentially other autoimmune diseases. Studies in Aire deficient mice have shown that autoantibodies result directly from failed antigen presentation in the thymus.2527 For example, Aire deficient mice make autoantibodies to lung epithelium and have an inflammatory infiltrate within the lung. The autoantibody target is the lung-specific protein vomeromodulin and the autoantibody arises secondary to failed thymic presentation of vomeromodulin. Similar to Aire deficient mice, there are also APS1 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) that shows nearly identical pathology to the disease in mice and interestingly, these patients also make autoantibodies to LPLUNC1 a vomeromodulin homologue.27

Thymic antigen expression in other autoimmune diseases

The importance of thymic antigen presentation may extend beyond APS1 and be relevant to other autoimmune diseases. For example, in type I diabetes thymic expression of insulin has been linked to disease. Population studies have shown that individuals with polymorphisms in the variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) region upstream of the insulin promoter are more likely to develop disease secondary to lower thymic expression of insulin.5657 A similar situation occurs with myasthenia gravis and expression of the TRA CHRNA1(αchain of the acetylcholine receptor).58 A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter of the CHRNA1 gene has been associated with early-onset myasthenia in two populations. Interestingly, this polymorphism is associated with decreased CHRNA1 antigen expression in ex vivo human mTECs. Furthermore, a correlation seems to exist between thymic CHRNA1 expression and AIRE expression, indicating that AIRE may play a role in CHRNA1 expression in the human thymus. Finally, it is interesting to note that the known predisposition to autoimmunity in patients with thymic tumors may be acquiring autoimmunity through a defect in appropriate AIRE expression.59.

Immunodysregulation polyendocrinopathy enteropathy X-linked syndrome

IPEX clinical features

IPEX is a rare, X-linked, syndrome that results in a severe systemic autoimmune disorder. Most patients with IPEX have the clinical triad of enteritis, endocrinopathy, and dermatitis (Table 1).6061 The presenting symptom is often intractable diarrhea with failure to thrive (FTT) requiring parenteral nutrition.62 Histologically, the bowel shows villous atrophy and extensive lymphocytic infiltrate within the mucosa. Insulin-dependent type I diabetes and hypothyrodism are the most common endocrinopathies seen in IPEX. Similar to the GI disease, patients with endocrinopathies have inflammatory infiltrates within the pancreas and thyroid and will often have autoantibodies to pancreatic islet cells.6061 The dermatitis that affects IPEX patients is most commonly an eczematous rash that in some patients can be very severe affecting a large percentage of their body surface area. In addition to the diagnostic triad, IPEX patients can have multiple other autoimmune manifestations including cytopenias, renal disease, and hepatitis.6061 The symptoms in IPEX can fluctuate with exacerbations precipitated by infections, dietary allergans, or vaccinations. Laboratory studies often show eosinophilia and hypergammaglobulinemia. IPEX patients often display increased susceptibility to a wide range of infections including bacterial, viral, and fungal, a phenomenom which is ascribed to decreased barrier function secondary to severe gastritis and dermatitis.6162 Treatment of IPEX is with either immunosuppressive agents or bone marrow transplantation.6364 Aggressive treatment is warranted as this disease can be lethal if left untreated.

IPEX genetics

The discovery of the genetic mutation in IPEX was made possible secondary to observation of a mouse mutant called scurfy which has severe autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation similar to IPEX. The mutated gene in scurfy mice was found to be the Foxp3 gene located on Xp11.3-q13.3.65 After Foxp3 was identified in mice, two groups sequenced the FOXP3 gene in families with IPEX and discovered mutations within the human homologue.6667 In these families, only males are affected and female carriers with one functional copy of FOXP3 are asymptomatic. A wide range of mutations have been found in the FOXP3 gene of IPEX patients including point mutations, deletions, and splicing mutations.6061 Foxp3 is a zinc-finger transcription factor required for the development and function of regulatory T cells (Treg cells). Treg cells are CD4+, IL-2Rα (CD25+), and Foxp3+ T cells that are functionally anergic and upon activation produce cytokines and cell surface molecules that are important in diminishing immune responses in a variety of settings.6869 These cells make up approximately 10–15% of CD4+ T cells and have proven to be critical mediators of peripheral tolerance.

IPEX pathogenesis

Prior to the discovery of Foxp3, the identity of Treg cells was suspected when a seminal study showed lymphocyte suspensions depleted of CD4+CD25+ cells induced autoimmunity when injected into lymphopenic mice.70 Interestingly, the autoimmunity could be prevented with immediate reconstitution of the mice with CD4+CD25+ T cells and the effects of the CD4+CD25+ T cells were dose dependent. This important study was the first to suggest a population of suppressor cells within the CD4+CD25+ T cell lineage. After the discovery of Foxp3, several groups determined that Foxp3 functions specifically in CD4+CD25+ T cells and is critical for the prevention of autoimmunity.7172 Bone marrow chimeras using bone marrow from Foxp3 deficient mice into wild-type hosts induced an autoimmune syndrome similar to scurfy mice indicating that Foxp3 functions in hematopoietic cells.71 Furthermore, using retroviral vectors that express Foxp3, it was shown that CD4+CD25 T cells could be transformed into Treg cells by expression of Foxp3 and these cells are able to suppress T effecter cells both in vitro and in vivo.72 Treg cell lineage specification was further defined using a Foxp3GFP reporter mouse that expresses functional Foxp3.73 This mouse showed that Foxp3 is exclusively expressed in CD4+CD25+ Treg cells and in no other tissues or hematopoietic cells. In addition, the importance of Treg cell function throughout life is illustrated with the Foxp3DTR mouse and a study utilizing cre-mediated ablation of Foxp3 in mature Treg cells.7475 In both mouse models, selective ablation of Treg cells in adult mice leads to death in three weeks secondary to autoimmunity. The ability of a specialized set of cells to enforce tolerance is defined as dominant tolerance, as this cell type is able to suppress self-reactivity by acting in a dominant fashion.6869 The model of dominant tolerance explains why female carriers of a mutated Foxp3 are not affected. Despite random X-chromosome inactivation and only one-half of T cells harboring a functional Foxp3 gene, carrier females are normal because the Treg cell population carrying the wild-type allele is able to control autoimmunity in a dominant fashion.76

Significant research has been performed to determine the exact mechanism by which Treg cells are able to dampen the immune system. It is likely that multiple mechanisms are involved including both contact dependent mechanisms (direct killing of activated T cells/antigen presenting cells (APCs)) and soluble factors (production of inhibitory cytokines such as IL-10 or TGF-β).6869 Two well characterized mediators of Treg cell suppression are the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4) and the cytokine IL-10.7778 CTLA-4 is a surface molecule on T cells which is in the same family as the co-stimulatory molecule CD28. Selective ablation of CTLA-4 on Treg cells in mice results in severe autoimmunity. CTLA-4 is hypothesized to function on Treg cells by sending an inhibitory signal to APCs and reducing their production of proinflammatory cytokines.69,78 Additionally, loss of IL-10 production by Treg cells results in gut and lung inflammation suggesting a role for specific cytokines in Treg cell function.77

Treg cell differentiation and Foxp3 expression

The extracellular signals required for Treg cell differentiation in the thymus and Foxp3 expression is an area of intense research. It has been hypothesized that Treg cells express self-reactive TCRs and that TCR specificity for self may guide Treg cell differentiation. Several studies have shown that Treg cell TCRs are skewed toward self-peptides and that TCR signaling is likely important for Foxp3 expression.7980 Several transcription factors downstream of the TCR have been implicated in Foxp3 expression including NFAT, NF-κB, CREB, AP1, and ATF.8184 IL-2 has also been implicated in Treg cell differentiation because mature Treg cells express high levels of the CD25. Experiments utilizing a Foxp3GFP reporter mouse crossed onto the IL-2 and IL-2 receptor knockout background showed that IL-2 is not required for Foxp3 induction in the thymus, but it is required for the peripheral homeostasis of Treg cells and the continued expression of Foxp3 in the periphery.85 In support of this finding, mice lacking IL-2 or IL-2Rα have a severe lymphoproliferative syndrome.86 Notably, recent case reports have described patients that have mutations in both copies of the IL-2 receptor gene and these patients present with severe autoimmunity similar to IPEX.8788 Additional signals implicated in Treg cell differentiation include TCR co-stimulatory molecules such as CD28 and the cytokine TGF-β.8990

To add a layer of complexity, Treg cell differentiation can be further divided into natural and adaptive regulatory T cells.91 Natural Treg cells originate in the thymus while adaptive Treg cells are induced in the periphery from a population of CD4+CD25 T cells. Adaptive Treg cells are mainly located in lymph nodes and chronically inflamed tissue.9293 The exact signals required for adaptive Treg cell development are controversial, however, there is thought to be considerable overlap with the signals required for natural Treg cell development including TCR signaling, costimulation with CTLA-4, TGF-β, and IL-2.91 Additionally, retinoic acid produced by CD103+ dendritic cells in the lamina propria of the gut has been implicated in the development of adaptive Treg cells.9495 Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that adaptive Treg cells may be particularly important in the gut to dampen the immune response to commensal bacteria and food antigens.

Molecular mechanism of Foxp3 function

Regulatory T cells (Treg cells) represent a unique population of CD4+ T cells and the transcription factor Foxp3 serves as a lineage specification marker. The Foxp3 protein contains many functional domains: an N terminal proline rich region that binds the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), a central domain that contains a C2H2 zinc finger and a leucine zipper that is thought to be involved in protein-protein interactions, and a C terminal region that contains the forkhead DNA binding domain and the nuclear targeting sequences (Figure 3).61 NFAT is a transcription factor required for activation of T cells and IL-2 production. Interestingly, the Foxp3/NFAT complex acts as a corepressor of cytokine promoters such as IL-2 and changes T cell phenotype from one of activation to tolerance.96 In addition to NFAT, Foxp3 also binds to several other transcription factors including the Runt domain transcription factor Runx1, IRF4, STAT3, and the orphan nuclear receptors RORγ and RORα.97100

Figure 3
Functional Domains of Foxp3 protein. The N terminus contains a repressor domain important for binding the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) and inhibiting its function. The middle of the Foxp3 protein contains a zinc finger domain and a leucine ...

Recently, two groups performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments to analyze Foxp3 DNA binding.101102 Previous microarray profiling of Foxp3+ T cells compared to Foxp3 T cells revealed that Foxp3 induced the expression of many genes important for its function including CTLA-4, CD25, IL-10, and the TNF family member GITR.73,103104 Interestingly, ChIP analysis showed that Foxp3 only directly regulated approximately 10% of these genes and induced a group of transcription factors and micro RNAs that likely play an important role in Treg cell biology.68,101102

Human FOXP3+ regulatory T cells

The isolation of Treg cells from peripheral blood in humans has proven to be much more complex than the isolation of Treg cells in mice. The main reason for this complexity is that upon T cell stimulation naïve human CD4 T cells will transiently express low-levels of FOXP3 making it difficult to differentiate Treg cells from effecter T cells.105106 The exact function of the low-level expression of FOXP3 in activated T cells is unknown, however, these cells secrete inflammatory cytokines and are unable to suppress in vitro.107108 Due to the heterogeneous expression of FOXP3 in human CD4+ T cells, it cannot be used alone as a marker of Tregs.109110 To circumvent this problem, many groups have attempted to use the level of FOXP3 protein and the methylation status of the FOXP3 promoter to identify Tregs.109,111112 Human Treg cells are defined by high levels of FOXP3 protein associated with a completely demethylated FOXP3 promoter while activated T cells express lower levels of FOXP3 protein and the FOXP3 promoter is incompletely demethylated.

One difficulty in using FOXP3 protein to define Treg cells is that FOXP3 is a nuclear protein and T cells must be fixed prior to analyzing protein expression. Therefore, Treg cells isolated using FOXP3 cannot be used for further applications. In mice, CD25 can be used as a surrogate marker as most CD25+ cells will express high levels of FOXP3 and will have a suppressive phenotype.70 In contrast, activated human CD4+ T cells that transiently express FOXP3 also express high levels of CD25 making it difficult to solely use this cell-surface marker for the isolation of human Treg cells. For this reason, many groups are using additional markers such as CD127, CD49d, and CD45 isoforms for the isolation of human Treg cells to be used in further functional assays.109,113114

One marker that has been used successfully is the IL-7 receptor, CD127, which is found on both effecter and memory T cells. In contrast, FOXP3 positive human T regulatory cells express low levels of CD127. Using a combination of high surface expression of CD4 and CD25 along with low levels of CD127 has allowed several groups to isolate a pure population of human Treg cells that express high levels of FOXP3 protein that retain suppressive function.114115 Another marker that has recently been used to aid in the purification of human Treg cells is CD49d which is the α-chain of the integrin VLA-4(α4β1) and is found on the majority of proinflammatory effecter cells, but is absent on FOXP3 positive Treg cells. By depleting CD49d+ cells, one group has been able to enrich for Treg suppressor cells within the CD25+/CD127lo subset of cells.113 The ability to isolate a pure population of human Treg cells is critical because Treg cells may be important in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases and adoptive transfer of Treg cells has been proposed as a potential therapy for these diseases.

Treg cells and autoimmune disease

While Treg cells are clearly important in the pathogenesis of IPEX, a number of studies have recently attempted to address whether subtle changes in Treg cell function or numbers are important in other polygenic autoimmune disease. In both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and type I diabetes, there have been conflicting results as to whether Treg cells are deficient. For example, in RA two groups found no difference in the ability of Treg cells from RA patients to suppress effecter T cell proliferation, however, another group found a striking defect.116118 Similarly, for type I diabetes one group found a reduction in Treg cell percentage of CD4+ T cells, while several other groups have found no difference in Treg cell frequency.119122 Further research needs to be performed to better understand the role of Treg cells in more common autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome

ALPS clinical Features

The autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is characterized by lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, autoimmune manifestations, and an increased risk of malignancy (Table 1).123125 The lymphadenopathy in ALPS is chronic and to be diagnosed a patient must have lymphadenopathy for >6 months.124125 The most common autoimmune manifestation of ALPS are cytopenias secondary to autoimmune destruction of blood cells (red blood cells, platelets, or neutrophils) affecting 70% of patients.124125 Destruction of hematopoietic cells is often autoantibody mediated and 92% of ALPS patients develop at least one autoantibody: anticardiolipin, direct antigen test (DAT), anti-platelet, anti-neutrophil, anti-nuclear, or rheumatoid factor.125 Autoimmunity, however, can affect almost any organ system including the kidney (nephritis), liver (hepatitis), eye (uveitis), joints (arthritis), gut (colitis), and skin (urticaria). The exact risk of malignancy in ALPS patients is unknown, although it is postulated to be 10%–20%.126 The most common malignancy is lymphoma and there are case reports of leukemia's as well as several solid tumors.124126 The treatment of ALPS is based on the clinical manifestations with immunosuppressive agents used to treat autoimmune manifestations and chemotherapy for malignancy.124126 Bone-marrow transplants have been performed in patients with severe-refractory disease.127

ALPS genetics

Similar to APS1 and IPEX, the pathogenesis of ALPS has been delineated utilizing a mouse model that phenotypically resembled patients with ALPS. Mice homozygous for the lpr or gld mutations were found to have multiple autoimmune manifestations, autoantibody production, and an increase in nonmalignant TCRαβ CD4CD8 double-negative (DN) T cells.128129 The lpr and gld mutations were determined to be in Fas or its binding partner Fas ligand (FasL) which are both critical for the apoptosis of activated lymphocytes. Similar to lpr or gld mice, ALPS patients have increased numbers of DN T cells and were found to have mutations in FAS (ALPS-FAS), and FASLG (ALPS-FASLG), demonstrating that defective apoptosis is the cause of the disease.130132 A large number of FAS mutations (>70) have been discovered with two-thirds in the intracellular domain (ICD) and one-third in the extracellular domain (ECD). Clinical penetration is higher with ICD mutations (70–90% penetration) than ECD mutations (30% penetration).125,133

The first ALPS patients described had mutations in one FAS gene and the syndrome was inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion in which there was a family history of ALPS. Subsequent studies revealed patients with homozygous mutations in FAS.131,134135 Predictably, patients with homozygous mutations have severely diminished FAS expression and a more severe ALPS phenotype requiring early bone-marrow transplantation. Additionally, one family has been described in which two siblings are compound heterozygote's with distinct missense mutations in each FAS allele.136 Interestingly, despite mutations in both FAS genes these patients have a milder ALPS phenotype. Also, unlike other patients with homozygous FAS mutations these patients did not have a family history of ALPS despite both parents being heterozygous for FAS. This may be due to the specific FAS mutation with missense mutations causing a milder phenotype.

Further work identified other mutations responsible for an ALPS or ALPS-like phenotype including Caspase 10 (ALPS-CASP10), Caspase 8 (CEDS), and the NRAS oncogene (RALD).137140 Caspase 10 is a protein downstream of Fas in the apoptotic pathway. Similar to ALPS patients with FAS or FASLG mutations, CASPASE 10 mutations are usually inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Analogous to Caspase 10, Caspase 8 is dowstream of Fas in the apoptotic pathway, however, the inheritance of Caspase 8 mutations and the phenotype of families with Caspase 8 mutations differs from typical ALPS patients. For this reason, Caspase 8 deficiency is given a unique acronym, CEDS, standing for Caspase-Eight Deficiency State.141 Families with Caspase 8 mutations display autosomal recessive inheritance and also have defects in T, B, and NK activation leading to susceptibility to bacterial and viral infections. NRAS is a small GTPase and activating mutations in NRAS cause decreased activity of the proapoptotic protein BIM.142 This disease entity is now classified as RALD, for RAS-associated autoimmune leukoproliferative disease.141

To further complicate ALPS classification, patients with somatic mutations in Fas (not germline) have recently been discovered and have been named ALPS-sFAS.143144 Patients who have the ALPS phenotype, but who do not have an identifiable mutation are called ALPS-U. Recently, an NIH consensus conference created a new ALPS classification scheme (Table 2) and diagnostic criteria (Table 3).124,141,145146 Two other ALPS-like disorders are Dianzani Autoimmune Lyphoproliferative disease (DALD) and X-linked lymphoproliferative disease (XLP1).147148 The mutation for DALD is unknown and the mutation in XLP1 is in the SH2D1A gene. Patients with DALD present with lymphadenopathy, autoimmunity, and defective Fas-mediated apoptosis, however, these patients have normal numbers of DN T cells. Due to the normal number of DN T cells, DALD is given its own acronym because it is thought to be a unique genetic disorder.

Table II
Diagnostic Classification of ALPS and ALPS-like disorders140
Table III
Diagnostic Criteria for ALPS

ALPS pathogenesis

As discussed above, ALPS patients have a variety of defects in the apoptotic pathway. The exact mechanism, however, by which defects in apoptosis cause the autoimmunity seen in ALPS is unknown. One hypothesis is that failure of the immune system to contract after antigen stimulation may lead to the escape of autoreactive clones and autoimmunity. Upon antigen stimulation, lymphocytes express Fas and FasL on their surface in the process of activation induced cell death (AICD). In order for Fas or FasL to induce apoptosis they each must form a trimolecular complex.149 The requirement of the trimolecular complex explains the autosomal dominant inheritance seen in ALPS-FAS, ALPS-FASL, and ALPS-sFAS.130132 In heterozygous patients the mutated allele functions as a dominant-negative inhibiting the function of the wild-type allele and disrupting the formation of a functional complex. In most cases, the mutated Fas protein still forms a trimolecular complex with wild-type Fas, however, the mutated Fas allele disrupts death domain signaling or binding of FasL.125 Similarly, patients with ALPS-CASP10 also show autosomal dominant inheritance with the mutated Caspase 10 functioning in a dominate-negative fashion.

One important unanswered question regarding the pathogenesis of ALPS pertains to the unexplained heterogeneity in clinical manifestations among family members with the same ALPS genotype. Some family members will be asymptomatic while others will require significant immunosuppression. It has been proposed that the genetic background of the individual will determine the severity of the disease and that additional mutations in genes involved in tolerance may tip the balance toward autoimmunity.150 Thus, similar to cancer autoimmunity may involve a multi-step process in which additional mutations in rapidly dividing immune cells promotes the growth of autoimmune clones that cause disease. Support for this hypothesis comes from ALPS patients with somatic mutations in Fas.143144 These patients have normal germline FAS alleles; however, at some point in lymphocyte maturation a somatic mutation occurred in one FAS allele breaking tolerance. The finding that somatic mutations are able to break tolerance may explain the heterogeneity seen in ALPS patients as patients with more severe disease may have accumulated additional mutations promoting autoimmunity. Future research will aim to determine the other genes and environmental factors potentially modulating the ALPS phenotype and to further understand how defects in apoptosis lead to autoimmunity.

Summary

The study of monogenic autoimmune diseases has provided invaluable insights into the underlying mechanisms of immune tolerance. Mouse models of these diseases have allowed detailed studies of the pathogenesis of these unique syndromes and have shed light on the molecular mechanisms of autoimmunity. By further dissecting the molecular pathways involved in these diseases we may gain a greater understanding not only of the pathogenesis of monogenic autoimmune syndromes, but of more common autoimmune syndromes. The downstream genes or associated pathways may provide us with novel therapies or aid in the diagnosis of autoimmune disease. Therapies are already being developed from the lessons learned in these diseases. One new therapy that has emerged is the adoptive transfer of Tregs for the treatment of type I diabetes based on studies of a mouse model of diabetes showing that the transfer of a small number of antigen-specific Tregs could reverse diabetes.151 A number of groups are in the process of moving toward using the adoptive transfer of Tregs for diverse autoimmune diseases such as type I diabetes and graft vs host disease.152154 Similarly, the novel autoantibodies discovered from the study in APS1 may aid in the diagnosis of more common autoimmune disease such as interstitial lung disease or autoimmune gonadal failure. In summary, the exciting research advances from the study of monogenic autoimmune diseases are making vital contributions to the diagnosis and treatment of more common autoimmune diseases.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Una Fan for her help with the figures and Mickie Cheng for critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the NIH and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund to M.S.A.

References

1. Zenewicz L, Abraham C, Flavell R, Cho J. Unraveling the Genetics of Autoimmunity. Cell. 2010;140:791–797. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Gregersen P, Olsson L. Recent advances in the genetics of autoimmune disease. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:363–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Husebye E, Perheentupa J, Rautemaa R, Kämpe O. Clinical manifestations and management of patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I. J Intern Med. 2009;265:514–529. [PubMed]
4. Perheentupa J. Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2843–2850. [PubMed]
5. Rautemaa R, Hietanen J, Niissalo S, Pirinen S, Perheentupa J. Oral and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma-a complication or component of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED, APS-I) Oral Oncol. 2007;43:607–613. [PubMed]
6. Gylling M, et al. The hypoparathyroidism of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy protective effect of male sex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:4602–4608. [PubMed]
7. Ahonen P, Myllarniemi S, Sipila I, Perheentupa J. Clinical variation of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) in a series of 68 patients. NEJM. 1990;322:1829–1836. [PubMed]
8. Myllärniemi S, Perheentupa J. Oral findings in the autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidosis syndrome (APECS) and other forms of hypoparathyroidism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978;45:721–729. [PubMed]
9. Wolff A, et al. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 in Norway: phenotypic variation, autoantibodies, and novel mutations in the autoimmune regulator gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:595–603. [PubMed]
10. Rosatelli M, et al. A common mutation in Sardinian autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy patients. Hum Genet. 1998;103:428–434. [PubMed]
11. Zlotogora J, Shapiro M. Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type I among Iranian Jews. J Med Genet. 1992;29:824–826. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Consortium F-GA. An autoimmune disease, APECED, caused by mutations in a novel gene featuring two PHD-type zinc-finger domains. Nat Genet. 1997;17:399–403. [PubMed]
13. Nagamine K, et al. Positional cloning of the APECED gene. Nat Genet. 1997;17:393–398. [PubMed]
14. Mathis D, Benoist C. Aire. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:287–312. [PubMed]
15. Scott H, et al. Common mutations in autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy patients of different origins. Mol Endocrinol. 1998;12:1112–1119. [PubMed]
16. Gylling M, et al. ss-Cell Autoantibodies, Human Leukocyte Antigen II Alleles, and Type 1 Diabetes in Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy-Candidiasis-Ectodermal Dystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:4434–4440. [PubMed]
17. Halonen M, et al. AIRE mutations and human leukocyte antigen genotypes as determinants of the autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy phenotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:2568–2574. [PubMed]
18. Cetani F, et al. A novel mutation of the autoimmune regulator gene in an Italian kindred with autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy, acting in a dominant fashion and strongly cosegregating with hypothyroid autoimmune thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:4747–4752. [PubMed]
19. Cervato S, et al. Evaluation of the AIRE gene mutations in a cohort of Italian patients with autoimmune-polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal-dystrophy (APECED) and in their relatives. Clin Endocrinol. 2009;70:421–428. [PubMed]
20. Anderson MS, et al. Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science. 2002;298:1395–1401. [PubMed]
21. Ramsey C, et al. Aire deficient mice develop multiple features of APECED phenotype and show altered immune response. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:397–409. [PubMed]
22. Derbinski J, Schulte A, Kyewski B, Klein L. Promiscuous gene expression in medullary thymic epithelial cells mirrors the peripheral self. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:1032–1039. [PubMed]
23. Kishimoto H, Sprent J. Negative selection in the thymus includes semimature T cells. J Exp Med. 1997;185:263–271. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Derbinski J, Kyewski B. Linking signalling pathways, thymic stroma integrity and autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 2005;26:503–506. [PubMed]
25. DeVoss J, et al. Spontaneous autoimmunity prevented by thymic expression of a single self-antigen. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2727–2735. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Gavanescu I, Kessler B, Ploegh H, Benoist C, Mathis D. Loss of Aire-dependent thymic expression of a peripheral tissue antigen renders it a target of autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:4583–4587. [PubMed]
27. Shum AK, et al. Identification of an Autoantigen Demonstrates a Link Between Interstitial Lung Disease and a Defect in Central Tolerance. Sci Transl Med. 2009;1:9ra20–29ra20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Liston A, Lesage S, Wilson J, Peltonen L, Goodnow CC. Aire regulates negative selection of organ-specific T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:350–354. [PubMed]
29. Kogawa K, et al. Expression of AIRE gene in peripheral monocyte/dendritic cell lineage. Immunol Lett. 2002;80:195–198. [PubMed]
30. Gardner JM, et al. Deletional tolerance mediated by extrathymic Aire-expressing cells. Science. 2008;321:843–847. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Lee JW, et al. Peripheral antigen display by lymph node stroma promotes T cell tolerance to intestinal self. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:181–190. [PubMed]
32. Poliani PL, et al. Human Peripheral Lymphoid Tissues Contain Autoimmune Regulator-Expressing Dendritic Cells. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:1104–1112. [PubMed]
33. Bjorses P, et al. Localization of the APECED protein in distinct nuclear structures. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:259–266. [PubMed]
34. Koh AS, et al. Aire employs a histone-binding module to mediate immunological tolerance, linking chromatin regulation with organ-specific autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15878–15883. [PubMed]
35. Kumar PG, et al. The autoimmune regulator (AIRE) is a DNA-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:41357–41364. [PubMed]
36. Org T, et al. The autoimmune regulator PHD finger binds to non-methylated histone H3K4 to activate gene expression. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:370–376. [PubMed]
37. Bottomley MJ, et al. The SAND domain structure defines a novel DNA-binding fold in transcriptional regulation. Nat Struct Biol. 2001;8:626–633. [PubMed]
38. Derbinski J, et al. Promiscuous gene expression in thymic epithelial cells is regulated at multiple levels. J Exp Med. 2005;202:33–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Johnnidis JB, et al. Chromosomal clustering of genes controlled by the aire transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:7233–7238. [PubMed]
40. Derbinski J, Pinto S, Rosch S, Hexel K, Kyewski B. Promiscuous gene expression patterns in single medullary thymic epithelial cells argue for a stochastic mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:657–662. [PubMed]
41. Villasenor J, Besse W, Benoist C, Mathis D. Ectopic expression of peripheral-tissue antigens in the thymic epithelium: probabilistic, monoallelic, misinitiated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15854–15859. [PubMed]
42. Abramson J, Giraud M, Benoist C, Mathis D. Aire's partners in the molecular control of immunological tolerance. Cell. 2010;140:123–135. [PubMed]
43. Rando O, Chang H. Genome-wide views of chromatin structure. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:245–271. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Org T, et al. AIRE activated tissue specific genes have histone modifications associated with inactive chromatin. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:4699–4710. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Liiv I, et al. DNA-PK contributes to the phosphorylation of AIRE: importance in transcriptional activity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783:74–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Oven I, et al. AIRE recruits P-TEFb for transcriptional elongation of target genes in medullary thymic epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:8815–8823. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Pitkanen J, et al. Cooperative activation of transcription by autoimmune regulator AIRE and CBP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;333:944–953. [PubMed]
48. Nitiss J. DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:327–337. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Meloni A, et al. Autoantibodies against type I interferons as an additional diagnostic criterion for autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4389–4397. [PubMed]
50. Zhang L, et al. A robust immunoassay for anti-interferon autoantibodies that is highly specific for patients with autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1. Clin Immunol. 2007;125:131–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Kisand K, et al. Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis in APECED or thymoma patients correlates with autoimmunity to Th17-associated cytokines. J Exp Med. 2010;207:299–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Puel A, et al. Autoantibodies against IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 in patients with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I. J Exp Med. 2010;207:291–297. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Alimohammadi M, et al. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 and NALP5, a parathyroid autoantigen. NEJM. 2008;358:1018–1028. [PubMed]
54. Husebye E, et al. Autoantibodies against aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase in autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:147–150. [PubMed]
55. Soderbergh A, et al. Prevalence and clinical associations of 10 defined autoantibodies in autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:544–547. [PubMed]
56. Pugliese A, et al. The insulin gene is transcribed in the human thymus and transcription levels correlated with allelic variation at the INS VNTR-IDDM2 susceptibility locus for type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet. 1997;15:293–297. [PubMed]
57. Vafiadis P, et al. Insulin expression in human thymus is modulated by INS VNTR alleles at the IDDM2 locus. Nat Genet. 1997;15:289–292. [PubMed]
58. Giraud M, et al. An IRF8-binding promoter variant and AIRE control CHRNA1 promiscuous expression in thymus. Nature. 2007;448:934–937. [PubMed]
59. Cheng M, et al. Acquired autoimmune polyglandular syndrome, thymoma, and an AIRE defect. NEJM. 2010;362:764–766. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Ochs H, Gambineri E, Torgerson T. IPEX, FOXP3 and regulatory T-cells: a model for autoimmunity. Immunol Res. 2007;38:112–121. [PubMed]
61. Torgerson T, Ochs H. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked: forkhead box protein 3 mutations and lack of regulatory T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:744–750. [PubMed]
62. Powell B, Buist N, Stenzel P. An X-linked syndrome of diarrhea, polyendocrinopathy, and fatal infection in infancy. J Pediatr. 1982;100:731–737. [PubMed]
63. Battaglia M, et al. Rapamycin promotes expansion of functional CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ regulatory T cells of both healthy subjects and type 1 diabetic patients. J Immunol. 2006;177:8338–8847. [PubMed]
64. Rao A, et al. Successful bone marrow transplantation for IPEX syndrome after reduced-intensity conditioning. Blood. 2007;109:383–385. [PubMed]
65. Brunkow M, et al. Disruption of a new forkhead/winged-helix protein, scurfin, results in the fatal lymphoproliferative disorder of the scurfy mouse. Nat Genet. 2001;27:68–73. [PubMed]
66. Bennett C, et al. The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nat Genet. 2001;27:20–21. [PubMed]
67. Wildin R, et al. X-linked neonatal diabetes mellitus, enteropathy and endocrinopathy syndrome is the human equivalent of mouse scurfy. Nat Genet. 2001;27:18–20. [PubMed]
68. Lu L, Rudensky A. Molecular orchestration of differentiation and function of regulatory T cells. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1270–1282. [PubMed]
69. Wing K, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells exert checks and balances on self tolerance and autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2009;11:7–13. [PubMed]
70. Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 1995;155:1151. [PubMed]
71. Fontenot J, Gavin M, Rudensky A. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:330–336. [PubMed]
72. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299:1057–1061. [PubMed]
73. Fontenot J, et al. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity. 2005;22:329–341. [PubMed]
74. Kim JM, Rasmussen JP, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells prevent catastrophic autoimmunity throughout the lifespan of mice. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:191–197. [PubMed]
75. Williams L, Rudensky A. Maintenance of the Foxp3-dependent developmental program in mature regulatory T cells requires continued expression of Foxp3. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:277–284. [PubMed]
76. Gavin M, et al. Foxp3-dependent programme of regulatory T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2007;445:771–775. [PubMed]
77. Rubtsov Y, et al. Regulatory T cell-derived interleukin-10 limits inflammation at environmental interfaces. Immunity. 2008;28:546–558. [PubMed]
78. Wing K, et al. CTLA-4 control over Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function. Science. 2008;322:271–275. [PubMed]
79. Hsieh C, et al. Recognition of the peripheral self by naturally arising CD25+ CD4+ T cell receptors. Immunity. 2004;21:267–277. [PubMed]
80. Nishikawa H, et al. Definition of target antigens for naturally occurring CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2005;201:681–686. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Kim H, Leonard W. CREB/ATF-dependent T cell receptor-induced FoxP3 gene expression: a role for DNA methylation. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1543–1551. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Mantel P, et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying FOXP3 induction in human T cells. J Immunol. 2006;176:3593–3602. [PubMed]
83. Schmidt-Supprian M, et al. Differential dependence of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory and natural killer-like T cells on signals leading to NF-κB activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4566–4571. [PubMed]
84. Zheng Y, et al. Role of conserved non-coding DNA elements in the Foxp3 gene in regulatory T-cell fate. Nature. 2010;463:808–812. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Fontenot J, Rasmussen J, Gavin M, Rudensky A. A function for interleukin 2 in Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1142–1151. [PubMed]
86. Willerford D, et al. Interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain regulates the size and content of the peripheral lymphoid compartment. Immunity. 1995;3:521–530. [PubMed]
87. Caudy A, Reddy S, Chatila T, Atkinson J, Verbsky J. CD25 deficiency causes an immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked-like syndrome, and defective IL-10 expression from CD4 lymphocytes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:482–487. [PubMed]
88. Sharfe N, Dadi H, Shahar M, Roifman C. Human immune disorder arising from mutation of the chain of the interleukin-2 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3168–3171. [PubMed]
89. Liu Y, et al. A critical function for TGF- signaling in the development of natural CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:632–640. [PubMed]
90. Salomon B, et al. B7/CD28 costimulation is essential for the homeostasis of the CD4+ CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells that control autoimmune diabetes. Immunity. 2000;12:431–440. [PubMed]
91. Curotto de Lafaille M, Lafaille J. Natural and adaptive foxp3+ regulatory T cells: more of the same or a division of labor? Immunity. 2009;30:626–635. [PubMed]
92. Apostolou I, von Boehmer H. In vivo instruction of suppressor commitment in naive T cells. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1401–1408. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
93. Curotto de Lafaille M, Lino A, Kutchukhidze N, Lafaille J. CD25-T cells generate CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells by peripheral expansion. J Immunol. 2004;173:7259–7268. [PubMed]
94. Coombes J, et al. A functionally specialized population of mucosal CD103+ DCs induces Foxp3+ regulatory T cells via a TGF-beta and retinoic acid-dependent mechanism. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1757–1764. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Sun C, et al. Small intestine lamina propria dendritic cells promote de novo generation of Foxp3 T reg cells via retinoic acid. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1775–1785. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
96. Wu Y, et al. FOXP3 controls regulatory T cell function through cooperation with NFAT. Cell. 2006;126:375–387. [PubMed]
97. Chaudhry A, et al. CD4+ regulatory T cells control TH17 responses in a Stat3-dependent manner. Science. 2009;326:986–991. [PubMed]
98. Ono M, et al. Foxp3 controls regulatory T-cell function by interacting with AML1/Runx1. Nature. 2007;446:685–689. [PubMed]
99. Zheng Y, Chaudhry A, Kas A. Regulatory T-cell suppressor program co-opts transcription factor IRF4 to control TH2 responses. Nature. 2009;458:351–356. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
100. Zhou L, et al. TGF-beta-induced Foxp3 inhibits TH17 cell differentiation by antagonizing RORgammat function. Nature. 2008;453:236–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
101. Marson A, et al. Foxp3 occupancy and regulation of key target genes during T-cell stimulation. Nature. 2007;445:931–935. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
102. Zheng Y, et al. Genome-wide analysis of Foxp3 target genes in developing and mature regulatory T cells. Nature. 2007;445:936–940. [PubMed]
103. Gavin M, Clarke S, Negrou E, Gallegos A, Rudensky A. Homeostasis and anergy of CD4+ CD25+ suppressor T cells in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2001;3:33–41. [PubMed]
104. McHugh R, et al. CD4+ CD25+ Immunoregulatory T Cells:: Gene Expression Analysis Reveals a Functional Role for the Glucocorticoid-Induced TNF Receptor. Immunity. 2002;16:311–323. [PubMed]
105. Gavin M, et al. Single-cell analysis of normal and FOXP3-mutant human T cells: FOXP3 expression without regulatory T cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:6659–6664. [PubMed]
106. Walker M, et al. Induction of FoxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4 CD25–T cells. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1437–1443. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
107. Tran D, Ramsey H, Shevach E. Induction of FOXP3 expression in naive human CD4+ FOXP3 T cells by T-cell receptor stimulation is transforming growth factor-β dependent but does not confer a regulatory phenotype. Blood. 2007;110:2983–2990. [PubMed]
108. Walker M, Carson B, Nepom G, Ziegler S, Buckner J. De novo generation of antigen-specific CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells from human CD4+ CD25− cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:4103–4108. [PubMed]
109. Miyara M, et al. Functional delineation and differentiation dynamics of human CD4+ T cells expressing the FoxP3 transcription factor. Immunity. 2009;30:899–911. [PubMed]
110. Sakaguchi S, Miyara M, Costantino C, Hafler D. FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:490–500. [PubMed]
111. Allan S, Song-Zhao G, Abraham T, McMurchy A, Levings M. Inducible reprogramming of human T cells into Treg cells by a conditionally active form of FOXP3. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:3282–3289. [PubMed]
112. Hoffmann P, et al. Loss of FOXP3 expression in natural human CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells upon repetitive in vitro stimulation. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:1088–1097. [PubMed]
113. Kleinewietfeld M, et al. CD49d provides access to” untouched” human Foxp3+ Treg free of contaminating effector cells. Blood. 2009;113:827–836. [PubMed]
114. Liu W, et al. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1701–1711. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
115. Nadig S, et al. In vivo prevention of transplant arteriosclerosis by ex vivo-expanded human regulatory T cells. Nat Med. 2010;16:809–813. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Ehrenstein M, et al. Compromised function of regulatory T cells in rheumatoid arthritis and reversal by anti-TNF alpha therapy. J Exp Med. 2004;200:277–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
117. Esensten J, Wofsy D, Bluestone J. Regulatory T cells as therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:560–565. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
118. Valencia X, et al. TNF downmodulates the function of human CD4+ CD25hi T-regulatory cells. Blood. 2006;108:253–261. [PubMed]
119. Brusko T, et al. No alterations in the frequency of FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56:604–612. [PubMed]
120. Kukreja A, et al. Multiple immuno-regulatory defects in type-1 diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:131–140. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
121. Lindley S, et al. Defective suppressor function in CD4+ CD25+ T-cells from patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:92–99. [PubMed]
122. Putnam A, Vendrame F, Dotta F, Gottlieb P. CD4+ CD25high regulatory T cells in human autoimmune diabetes. J Autoimmun. 2005;24:55–62. [PubMed]
123. Sneller M, et al. A novel lymphoproliferative/autoimmune syndrome resembling murine lpr/gld disease. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:334–341. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
124. Teachey D, Seif A, Grupp S. Advances in the management and understanding of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) Br J Haematol. 2009;148:205–216. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
125. Worth A, Thrasher A, Gaspar H. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome: molecular basis of disease and clinical phenotype. Br J Haematol. 2006;133:124–140. [PubMed]
126. Straus S, et al. The development of lymphomas in families with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome with germline Fas mutations and defective lymphocyte apoptosis. Blood. 2001;98:194–200. [PubMed]
127. Dimopoulou M, et al. Successful treatment of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome and refractory autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura with a reduced intensity conditioning stem cell transplantation followed by donor lymphocyte infusion. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2007;40:605–606. [PubMed]
128. Takahashi T, et al. Generalized lymphoproliferative disease in mice, caused by a point mutation in the Fas ligand. Cell. 1994;76:969–976. [PubMed]
129. Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Brannan C, Copeland N, Jenkins N, Nagata S. Lymphoproliferation disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature. 1992:314–317. [PubMed]
130. Fisher G, et al. Dominant Interfering Fas Gene Mutations Impair Apoptosis in a Human Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome. Cell. 1995;81:935–946. [PubMed]
131. Rieux-Laucat F, et al. Mutations in Fas associated with human lymphoproliferative syndrome and autoimmunity. Science. 1995;268:1347–1349. [PubMed]
132. Wu J, et al. Fas ligand mutation in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and lymphoproliferative disease. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:1107–1113. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
133. Jackson C, et al. Am J Hum Genet. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 1999;64:1002–1014. [PubMed]
134. Kasahara Y, et al. Novel Fas (CD95/APO-1) mutations in infants with a lymphoproliferative disorder. Int Immunol. 1998;10:195–202. [PubMed]
135. Le Deist F, et al. Clinical, immunological, and pathological consequences of Fas-deficient conditions. Lancet. 1996;348:719–723. [PubMed]
136. Bettinardi A, et al. Missense mutations in the Fas gene resulting in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome: a molecular and immunological analysis. Blood. 1997;89:902–909. [PubMed]
137. Oliveira J, et al. NRAS mutation causes a human autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:8953–8958. [PubMed]
138. Wang J, et al. Inherited human Caspase 10 mutations underlie defective lymphocyte and dendritic cell apoptosis in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type II. Cell. 1999;98:47–58. [PubMed]
139. Zhu S, et al. Genetic alterations in caspase-10 may be causative or protective in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Hum genet. 2006;119:284–294. [PubMed]
140. Chun H, et al. Pleiotropic defects in lymphocyte activation caused by caspase-8 mutations lead to human immunodeficiency. Nature. 2002;419:395–399. [PubMed]
141. Oliveira J, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria and classification for the autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome: report from the 2009 NIH International Workshop. Blood. 2010 [PubMed]
142. Lenardo M, Oliveira J, Zheng L, Rao V. ALPS--Ten Lessons from an International Workshop on a Genetic Disease of Apoptosis. Immunity. 2010;32:291–295. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
143. Holzelova E, et al. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome with somatic Fas mutations. NEJM. 2004;351:1409. [PubMed]
144. Dowdell K, et al. Somatic FAS mutations are common in patients with genetically undefined autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) Blood. 2010;115:5164–5169. [PubMed]
145. Bleesing J, Straus S, Fleisher T. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. A human disorder of abnormal lymphocyte survival. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2000;47:1291–1310. [PubMed]
146. Seif A, Manno C, Grupp S, Teachey D. Testing patients with Evans syndrome for the Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome(ALPS): results of a large multinational clinical trial (ASPHO supplement) Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2008;50:S22–23.
147. Dianzani U, et al. Deficiency of the Fas apoptosis pathway without Fas gene mutations in pediatric patients with autoimmunity/lymphoproliferation. Blood. 1997;89:2871–2879. [PubMed]
148. Snow A, et al. Restimulation-induced apoptosis of T cells is impaired in patients with X-linked lymphoproliferative disease caused by SAP deficiency. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2976–2989. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
149. Strasser A, Jost P, Nagata S. The many roles of FAS receptor signaling in the immune system. Immunity. 2009;30:180–192. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
150. Goodnow C. Multistep pathogenesis of autoimmune disease. Cell. 2007;130:25–35. [PubMed]
151. Tang Q, et al. In vitro-expanded antigen-specific regulatory T cells suppress autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1455–1465. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
152. Brusko T, Putnam A, Bluestone J. Human regulatory T cells: role in autoimmune disease and therapeutic opportunities. Immunol Rev. 2008;223:371–390. [PubMed]
153. Putnam A, et al. Expansion of human regulatory T-cells from patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009;58:652–662. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
154. Trzonkowski P, et al. First-in-man clinical results of the treatment of patients with graft versus host disease with human ex vivo expanded CD4+ CD25+ CD127-T regulatory cells. Clin Immunol. 2009;133:22–26. [PubMed]