PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Surg Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 22.
Published in final edited form as:
J Surg Res. 1978 November; 25(5): 409–419.
PMCID: PMC3008562
NIHMSID: NIHMS255899

Liver Regeneration in Dogs: Morphologic and Chemical Changes1

Abstract

Forty-four percent and 72% hepatectomy were carried out in dogs and the animals were sacrificed for biochemical and pathologic studies from 0.5 to 6 days later. Compensatory hypertrophy and hyperplasia (“regeneration”) were evident within 1 day, reached a maximum in 3 days, and were almost complete by 6 days. Coincident with the histologic events of regeneration were decreases in responsiveness of receptor adenyl cyclase to glucagon stimulation, increases of cyclic AMP, inconsistent changes in plasma insulin, and increases in plasma glucagon. These studies have standardized hepatic resection in dogs and they have focused attention upon some possible mechanisms that will require further study.

INTRODUCTION

The timing and events of hepatic regeneration in rats have been well studied, both in the past [28] and more recently [1, 2, 15, 18, 21, 30]. There is little analogous information about hepatic regeneration in dogs. The purpose of this paper is to provide this information and to focus attention upon some hitherto undescribed biochemical changes that occur in regenerating livers after both large and small resections.

METHODS

Mongrel dogs weighing 14.5 to 23.5 kg were used. Anesthesia for the operation was with sodium pentobarbital supplemented with phencyclidine hydrochloride and succinyl choline chloride. At the postoperative times indicated in Table 1 the animals were sacrificed under the same anesthesia to obtain tissues for biochemical and pathologic analysis. About 2 hr before killing, 0.2 mCi/kg body weight [methyl-3H]thymidine was given intravenously. The specific activity was 47 Ci/mmol. For the biochemical studies, some of the liver tissues were kept in cold saline for fresh use and some were frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen.

TABLE 1
Experimental Groups

The following biochemical techniques were used. Tissue protein was measured by the method of Lowry et al. [17]. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was purified by the method of Schneider and Greco [23], and its content was measured by Giles and Meyers’ modification [8] of Burton’s [3] diphenylamine method. [Methyl-3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA was expressed as disintegrations per minute per 100 μg of purified DNA. Adenylate cyclase was determined by the methods of White and Zenser [29], Krishna et al. [13], and Salomon et al. [22] after homogenation and incubation of the liver by the method of Makman and Sutherland [19] which was modified by freezing the homogenate in liquid nitrogen. Cyclic AMP was analyzed by the radioimmunoassay of Harper and Brooker [10] from a trichloroacetic acid extract that had been passed through a Dowex 50W-X8 column of 200 to 400 mesh.

For the pathologic studies, parts of the liver tissues were fixed in buffered formaldehyde and parts in glutaraldehyde.

Frozen and paraffin sections were prepared from the formalin-fixed material. The frozen sections were stained for fat and some of the paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and other special stains. The size of hepatocytes in the middle zones of the lobules was measured on the stained sections by a method previously described [25] and the results are expressed in arbitrary size units. Other paraffin sections were dewaxed, dipped in Ilford K2 nuclear emulsion, and used for autoradiography. They were exposed to the photographic emulsion for 3 to 6 weeks until counts of the labeled nuclei stopped increasing.

The liver tissues that had been immersed in glutaraldehyde were trimmed and the outer overfixed and the inner underfixed portions discarded. The well-fixed middle layer of tissue was then cut into small blocks, postfixed in osmium tetroxide, and embedded in epoxy resin. Sections 0.5 μm thick were cut and stained with Azure II for light microscopy. The middle zone of the liver lobules was identified and the blocks were retrimmed to contain only this area. Ultrathin sections were then cut from random blocks and examined under a Phillips EM 300 electron microscope. The volume of the cytoplasm of a large number of hepatocytes, the area of rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum within these cells, and the dimensions of many mitochondria, microbodies, lysosomes, lipid inclusions, and clumps of glycogen were determined by the methods and formulas of Loud [16]. These measurements were then expressed in micrometers as volumes and areas for the average-size midzonal hepatocyte.

Two kinds of hepatectomy were studied. One was designed to remove more than two-thirds of the canine liver. The two leftmost and the two rightmost lobes were excised (Fig. 1). The other resection which was designed to remove less than half of the dog liver involved resection of the two leftmost lobes (Fig. 1). Removal of the two left lobes was most effectively done by a mass ligature which encompassed the hilar structures of these lobes as well as the hepatic veins leaving the specimen. When the large ligature was tied down it amputated the liver down to the main structures. The two right lobes were best removed by ligation of the hilar structures of each and by individual ligation of the hepatic veins. Postoperatively, intravenous or subcutaneous giucose/electrolyte solutions were given for 1 day. Diet was then resumed and no further special care was required.

Fig. 1
Extent of hepatectomies. For 72% resection the two far right and two far left lobes were removed. For 44% resection only the two far left lobes were excised.

The times of sacrifice and the extent of resection which determined the experimental groups are summarized in Table 1. Just before performing the 72% hepatic resections, venous samples were drawn from the portal vein and the suprarenal inferior vena cava. Samples were drawn again when the abdomen was reopened for sacrifice 0.5 to 6 days later. Plasma hormone concentrations were measured in the laboratory of Dr. R. H. Unger, Dallas, Texas. Insulin was analyzed using the immunoassay of Herbert and his associates [11]. Glucagon and glucagonlike immunoreactivity were determined by the radioimmunoassay methods of Faloona and Unger [5]. The primary pancreatic glucagon measured with this technique has a molecular weight of 3500 although other larger moieties have some activity. Glucagonlike immunoreactivity arising from a variety of sources including gastrointestinal tract and salivary glands consists of at least two different molecular weight fractions as demonstrated by Moody [20]. The cross-reactivity of glucagon and glucagonlike immunoreactivity was about 2% in the Dallas laboratory.

RESULTS

Extent of Resection

Ten normal dogs weighing 8.8 to 35.9 kg were sacrificed. The liver weight was 2.43 ± 0.66% (SD) of the body weight. The two leftmost lobes plus the two rightmost lobes (Fig. 1), as removed in Groups 1 through 7, constituted 71.6 ± 1.6% (SD) of the total liver. The two leftmost lobes (Fig. 1), as removed in Groups 8 through 11, constituted 44.1 ± 3.9% (SD) of the liver.

44% Hepatic Resection

Pathologic observations

The animals killed 1, 2, 3, and 4 days after 44% hepatic resection all showed enlargement of the hepatocytes and the lobules in the remaining liver (Table 2). The enlargement of the hepatocytes included the nucleus and nucleolus and was accompanied by accumulation of large numbers of fat globules within the cytoplasm (Fig. 2). At 1 day there was very little glycogen in the liver cells; subsequently, the amount of glycogen slowly increased, but was still low at 4 days. The swollen hepatocytes caused narrowing of the sinusoidal spaces. The amount of both rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum in each enlarged hepatocyte was increased. This increase was greatest 3 days after hepatic resection. Lysosomes were larger and more numerous; some formed large autophagosomes containing cell fragments. Microbodies also increased in numbers. Mitochondria remained normal and there was no evidence of loosening of the attachments between adjacent hepatocytes. The number of free ribosomes in the hepatocytes was not increased.

Fig. 2
Part of an enlarged hepatocyte from a dog subjected to 44% hepatectomy 24 hr earlier. Both rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum are prominent. Fat globules (fg) are present. The number of lysosomes (ly) is increased. Glycogen is depleted. The mitochondria ...
TABLE 2
Autoradiography, Cell Size, and Mitotic Activity after 44% Hepatic Resection

Autoradiography demonstrated increased uptake of tritiated thymidine into DNA (Table 2). This process had started the day after partial hepatectomy and reached a peak in 3 days. The labeled hepatocytes were most common in the peripheral part of the liver lobule. The number of hepatocytes in mitosis also increased after hepatectomy (Table 2).

The Kupffer cells increased in size and number and their phagosomes enlarged. The appearances of the other littoral, ductular, and connective tissue cells were not altered. These cells did show an increase in thymidine uptake and in the number of mitoses, but these changes lagged behind those in the hepatocytes and were randomly distributed in the lobule.

DNA synthesis

The increase in DNA synthesis had started by 24 hr reached a maximum at 3 days, and began to decline in 4 days (Table 3).

TABLE 3
DNA Synthesis after 44% Hepatectomy

Adenyl cyclase

The basal adenyl cyclase activity was unchanged at all time periods after 44% resection. However, there were highly significant changes in the receptor or glucagon-stimulated component of adenyl cyclase beginning the first day and continuing through the third postoperative day. At all the glucagon concentrations there was a marked decrease of responsiveness (Table 4). The total or sodium fluoride-stimulated adenyl cyclase activity was not significantly changed.

TABLE 4
Adenylate Cyclase Activity after 44% Hepatectomy

Cyclic AMP

The most dramatic change occurred 1 day after hepatectomy. Cyclic AMP concentration tripled, then started to return to normal, but remained significantly elevated even after 2, 3, and 4 days (Table 5).

TABLE 5
Cyclic AMP after 44% Hepatectomy

72% Hepatic Resection

Pathologic observations

The changes in the liver remnants of the animals killed 0.5 to 6 days after 72% hepatectomy were the same as those after 44% resection but were more pronounced (Tables 6 and and77).

TABLE 6
Autoradiography, Cell Size, and Mitotic Activity after 72% Hepatic Resection
TABLE 7
Ultrastructural Composition of Average Midzonal Hepatocyte in the Dog at Various Intervals after 72% Hepatectomy

Incorporation of labeled thymidine into the nuclei had commenced in the hepatocytes at the periphery of the lobules by 12 hr after partial hepatectomy. Later the location of labeled hepatocytes became random. The peak response was at 3 days. The increase in the number of hepatocytes in mitosis followed the same pattern. Enlargement of the hepatocytes, accumulation of lipid within their cytoplasm, and increase in the amount of both rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum also reached a peak at about 3 days after hepatectomy. The growth in numbers of microbodies and the multiplication and increase in size of lysosomes reached a maximum a day earlier. The glycogen content of the cells was at its lowest 24 hr after hepatectomy; thereafter there was a slow recovery. The size and structure of the mitochondria were unaltered at all time periods following liver resection.

The wave of increased incorporation of labeled thymidine and mitoses in the littoral, ductular, and connective tissue cells reached its peak at 4 to 5 days after partial hepatectomy.

DNA synthesis

The timing of response after 72% hepatic resection was the same as with the 44% resection, but its magnitude was four times as great (Table 8). As with 44% resection the first significant increase was at 1 day, the peak response was at 3 days, and by 4 days a downward trend was identifiable. However, even after 6 days, DNA synthesis was still higher than normal. DNA concentration after Days 2 and 3 was decreased to a significant extent (Table 8).

TABLE 8
DNA Synthesis after 72% Hepatectomy

Adenyl cyclase

The basal adenyl cyclase was unchanged at all sampling times from 0.5 to 6 days postoperative. The same applied to the total catalytic adenyl cyclase (Table 9).

TABLE 9
Adenylate Cyclase Activity after 72% Hepatectomya

In contrast, the receptor, or glucagon-stimulated, component of adenyl cyclase was significantly depressed at low glucagon concentrations as early as 24 hr. At 1, 2, and 3 days this decrease of responsiveness to glucagon was evident at all the lower concentrations. By 4 days these adenyl cyclase changes had reverted to normal (Table 9) in spite of the fact that active regeneration was still proceeding by parameters of autoradiography and DNA synthesis (see below).

Cyclic AMP

As with the 44% resection there was an early increase in hepatic cyclic AMP. This change was maximum after 1 day, but was already fully evident within 12 hr. By 3 days the cyclic AMP had returned to normal and on Days 4 and 5, the cyclic AMP was depressed below normal to a statistically significant degree. The cyclic AMP response after 72% resection was distinctly more transient than after the 44% resection. With the smaller hepatectomy the cyclic AMP increase lasted for 3 days instead of 1 day with the more extensive operation (Table 10).

TABLE 10
Cyclic AMP after 72% Hepatectomy

Hormone Studies

The insulin and glucagon levels after 72% hepatectomy are summarized in Tables 11 and and12.12. No consistent change in either portal or vena caval insulin concentration could be detected. In contrast, portal and vena caval glucagon concentrations tended to be higher than control up to 4 days after resection.

TABLE 11
Plasma Insulin Levels in Portal Vein and Inferior Vena Caval Blood
TABLE 12
Plasma Glucagon Levels in Portal Venous and Inferior Vena Caval Blood

DISCUSSION

These results have shown that regeneration of the dog liver is as fully predictable as hepatic regeneration in the rat, but with important differences in timing. The maximum response in the dog is seen at 3 days in contrast to the well-known 24-hr peak in the rat.

The technique of 72% hepatic resection in the dog proved to be a model of reproducibility. Excision of the two leftmost and the two rightmost lobes has a percentage ablation that in 10 dogs ranged only from 70 to 75%, with a very small standard deviation. The 44% resection was somewhat less reliable in that the removal of the two leftmost lobes alone was an ablation ranging from 40 to 51%.

After both the 44 and 72% canine liver resections all the phenomena described after rat hepatectomies [1, 28] were seen including hepatocyte enlargement, lipid infiltration, glycogen depletion, and temporary increase in numbers of lysosomes, autophagosomes, and microbodies. We did not find any marked alterations in the mitochondria, nor did we find increased numbers of free ribosomes in the cytoplasm of the regenerating hepatocytes or any indications of loosening of the attachments of the hepatocytes to their neighbors. This is in agreement with Grisham’s [9] findings in the rat. The observations with autoradiography were also similar to those seen in the rat. There was the same commencement of DNA synthesis and mitosis in the hepatocytes at the periphery of the lobules with later extension to the hepatocytes in the central zones. The only difference was the time of maximal activity.

It was of interest that when increased thymidine incorporation occurred in cells of the hepatic remnant other than the hepatocytes, the littoral, ductular, and connective tissue cells participated fully. Particularly because of this, it was interesting to compare the overall results of autoradiography with those of DNA synthesis. The conformity between the two techniques was close. Furthermore, the number of cells in mitoses was proportional to thymidine uptake even though the number of cells actually dividing was only about 10% of those imbibing thymidine autoradiographically.

In recent years there has been a great interest in the influence of portal blood constituents upon liver regeneration [2, 4, 7, 12, 14, 15, 25, 26]. Attention has been focused upon hormones such as insulin and glucagon as important factors for the normal expression of regeneration [6, 21, 26, 27]. Although the present study was not designed to test the hormone hypothesis, some of the observations are worth noting. After 72% hepatectomy, the portal and vena caval levels of plasma insulin underwent inconsistent changes, but glucagon rose first and later returned toward normal. Cyclic changes in hormone concentrations and in hepatocyte cell membrane receptivity to the hormones was noted earlier by Leffert et al. [15] after hepatectomy in rats. Thus, the measurement of plasma hormone concentrations gives a woefully incomplete picture of the dynamic events following hepatectomy.

The same can be said of the swiftly occurring changes in adenyl cyclase and cyclic AMP. Beginning within 12 hr after hepatic resection the glucagon-stimulated adenyl cyclase activity became depressed and remained so for 1 to 3 days, the same general time period during which hyperglucagonemia was documented and cyclic AMP was elevated. Presently, however, we can only speculate how central these changes in adenyl cyclase and cyclic AMP are to the initiation and maintenance of an appropriate regeneration response. In this regard are the suggestions made by McManus [18] and by Short and his associates [24] that a very early elevation in cyclic AMP is an essential first step, if not a triggering step, for cell renewal.

Footnotes

1This work was supported by research Grants MRIS 8818-01 and 7227-01 from the Veterans Administration; by Grants AM-17260 and AM-07772 from the National Institutes of Health; and by Grants &R-00051 and RR-00069 from the General Clinical Research Centers Program of the Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health.

References

1. Bucher NLR, Malt RA. Morphological and biological aspects. In: Bucher NLR, Malt RA, editors. Regeneration of Liver and Kidney. chapter 3. Boston: Little, Brown; 1971. p. 23.
2. Bucher NLR, Swaffield M. Regulation of hepatic regeneration in rats by synergistic action of insulin and glucagon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72:1157. [PubMed]
3. Burton K. A study of the conditions and mechanisms of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem J. 1956;62:315. [PubMed]
4. Duguay LR, Orloff MJ. Role of the pancreas in regulation of liver regeneration in dogs. Surg Forum. 1977;28:387. [PubMed]
5. Faloona GR, Unger RH. Glucagon. In: Jaffe BM, Berman RH, editors. Methods of Hormone Radioimmunoassay. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 317.
6. Farivar M, Wands JR, Isselbacher KJ, Bucher NLR. Effect of insulin and glucagon on fulminant murine hepatitis. New Engl J Med. 1976;295:1517. [PubMed]
7. Fisher B, Szuch P, Fisher ER. Evaluation of a humoral factor in liver regeneration utilizing liver transplants. Cancer Res. 1971;31:322. [PubMed]
8. Giles KW, Myers A. An improved diphenylamine method for the estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature (London) 1965;206:93. [PubMed]
9. Grisham JW, Tillman RL, Nagel AEH, Campagno J. Ultrastructure of the proliferating hepatocyte: sinusoidal surfaces and endoplasmic reticulum. In: Lesch R, Reutter W, editors. Liver Regeneration After Experimental Injury. New York: Stratton Intercontinental Medical; 1975. p. 6.
10. Harper JF, Brooker G. Femtomole sensitive radioimmunoassay for cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP after 2’0 acetylation of acetic anhydride in aqueous solution. J Cyclic Nucleotide Res. 1975;1:207–208. [PubMed]
11. Herbert V, Kam-Seng L, Gottlieb CW, Bleicher SJ. Coated charcoal immunoassay of insulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1965;25:1375. [PubMed]
12. Holley RW. Control of growth of mammalian cells in cell culture. Nature (London) 1975;258:487. [PubMed]
13. Krishna G, Weiss B, Brodie BB. A simple sensitive method for the assay of adenyl cyclase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1968;163:379. [PubMed]
14. Leffert HL. Growth control of differentiated fetal rat hepatocytes in primary monolayer culture: VII, Hormonal control of DNA synthesis and its possible significance to the problem of liver regeneration. J Cell Biol. 1974;62:792. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Leffert H, Alexander NM, Faloona G, Rubalcava B, Unger R. Specific endocrine and hormonal receptor changes associated with liver regeneration in adult rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72:4033. [PubMed]
16. Loud AV. A quantitative stereological description of the ultrastructure of normal rat liver parenchymal cells. J Cell Biol. 1968;37:27. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265. [PubMed]
18. MacManus JP, Franks DJ, Youdale T, Braceland BM. Increases in rat liver cyclic AMP concentrations prior to the initiation of DNA synthesis following partial hepatectomy or hormone infusion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972;49:1201. [PubMed]
19. Makman MH, Sutherland EW. Use of liver adenyl cyclase for assay of glucagon in human gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Endocrinology. 1964;75:127. [PubMed]
20. Moody AJ. Gastrointestinal glucagon-like immunoreactivity. In: Letebvre TJ, Langer RN, editors. Glucagon: Molecular Physiology, Clinical and Therapeutic Implications. chapter 21. New York: Pergamon Press; 1972. p. 319.
21. Price JB. Insulin and glucagon as modifiers of DNA synthesis in the regenerating rat liver. Metabolism. 1976;25:1427. [PubMed]
22. Salomon Y, Londos C, Rodbell M. A highly sensitive adenylate cyclase assay. Anal Biochem. 1974;58:541. [PubMed]
23. Schneider WC, Greco AE. Incorporation of pyrimidine deoxyribonucleotides into liver lipids and other components. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1971;228:610. [PubMed]
24. Short J, Tsukada K, Rudert WA, Lieberman I. Cyclic adenosine 3′: 5′-monophosphate and the induction of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in liver. J Biol Chem. 1975;250:3602. [PubMed]
25. Starzl TE, Francavilla A, Halgrimson CG, Francavilla FR, Porter KA, Brown T, Putnam CW. The origin, hormonal nature and action of portal venous hepatotrophic substances. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973;137:179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Starzl TE, Porter KA, Kashiwagi N, Putnam CW. Portal hepatotrophic factors, diabetes mellitus and acute liver atrophy, hypertrophy and regeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;141:843. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Starzl TE, Porter KA, Watanabe K, Putnam CW. Effects of insulin, glucagon, and insulin/glucagon infusions on liver morphology and cell division after complete portacaval shunt in dogs. Lancet. 1976;1:821. [PubMed]
28. Weinbren K. Regeneration of the liver. Gastroenterology. 1959;37:657. [PubMed]
29. White AA, Zenser TE. Separation of cyclic 3′, 5′-adenosine monophosphate (cyclic AMP) from other nucleotides in aluminum oxide columns. Anal Biochem. 1971;41:372. [PubMed]
30. Whittemore AD, Kasuya M, Voorhees AB, Jr, Price JB., Jr Hepatic regeneration in the absence of portal viscera. Surgery. 1975;77:419. [PubMed]