PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcneulBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Neurology
 
BMC Neurol. 2010; 10: 102.
Published online Oct 28, 2010. doi:  10.1186/1471-2377-10-102
PMCID: PMC3006373
Gender differences in self reported long term outcomes following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
Angela Colantonio,corresponding author#1,2 Jocelyn E Harris,#1 Graham Ratcliff,3 Susan Chase,4 and Kristina Ellis2
1Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Canada
2Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Canada
3HealthSouth, Harmarville Rehabilitation Center, 320 Guys Road, PA, US
4Working Order, 1650 Main Street, Sharpsburg, PA, US
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
#Contributed equally.
Angela Colantonio: angela.colantonio/at/utoronto.ca; Jocelyn E Harris: harris.jocelyn/at/torontorehab.on.ca; Graham Ratcliff: graham_ratcliff/at/hotmail.com; Susan Chase: chase.susan/at/gmail.com; Kristina Ellis: ellis.kristina/at/torontorehab.on.ca
Received May 7, 2010; Accepted October 28, 2010.
Background
The majority of research on health outcomes after a traumatic brain injury is focused on male participants. Information examining gender differences in health outcomes post traumatic brain injury is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences in symptoms reported after a traumatic brain injury and to examine the degree to which these symptoms are problematic in daily functioning.
Methods
This is a secondary data analysis of a retrospective cohort study of 306 individuals who sustained a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury 8 to 24 years ago. Data were collected using the Problem Checklist (PCL) from the Head Injury Family Interview (HIFI). Using Bonferroni correction, group differences between women and men were explored using Chi-square and Wilcoxon analysis.
Results
Chi-square analysis by gender revealed that significantly more men reported difficulty setting realistic goals and restlessness whereas significantly more women reported headaches, dizziness and loss of confidence. Wilcoxon analysis by gender revealed that men reported sensitivity to noise and sleep disturbances as significantly more problematic than women, whereas for women, lack of initiative and needing supervision were significantly more problematic in daily functioning.
Conclusion
This study provides insight into gender differences on outcomes after traumatic brain injury. There are significant differences between problems reported by men compared to women. This insight may facilitate health service planners and clinicians when developing programs for individuals with brain injury.
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1.7 million Americans sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) each year [1]. Advances in medical technology and care have led to increasing numbers of individuals surviving TBI and requiring ongoing community services to facilitate their return to everyday activities [2-4]. The majority of research to date is predominantly focused on male participants likely due to males having a higher incidence of TBI than women. Information regarding the effect of TBI on women's health is limited. Further, it is known that women with disability lack sufficient medical care compared to women without a disability [5]. The examination of health outcomes based on gender may reflect important differences post TBI and help inform health service decision-makers.
There is a growing body of literature examining gender differences in outcome post TBI, however, findings are inconsistent. In a meta-analysis by Farace and Alves [6] women reported worse outcomes than men in 85% of measured variables; this was further supported in a recent systematic review [7] but with emphasis on worse outcomes in studies using older women. Conversely, others report superior results for community integration for women [8,9]. Further, studies investigating gender and its influence on functional outcome, found no difference between men and women [10-12]. Though similarities in functional outcome are apparent, consistent differences in TBI symptoms between men and women have been identified.
Literature examining gender differences in neuropsychological symptoms post TBI is more extensive than literature examining community integration and functional recovery. Numerous studies of gender differences in cognitive and psychological test performance have illustrated important distinctions. Executive function has been found to be superior in women compared to men post TBI [13-15] as well as memory and cognitive flexibility [16-18]. Whiteneck et al [19] studied outcomes after hospitalization for TBI one-year post-injury. Women were more likely to report symptoms such as fatigue, headaches, and balance problems compared to men. Headaches have been reported more frequently by women than men post TBI in several studies [20-22]. Hibbard et al [21] examined the prevalence of health issues 10 years post TBI and found being female and increased age were significant predictors for thyroid conditions, sleep difficulties, loss of urinary control and arthritis. Further, gender differences in symptoms of depression and anxiety have been reported with women demonstrating consistently worse outcomes [18,20,23]. These results highlight continued difficulty with cognitive and emotional functioning long after injury and reflect the need for ongoing health service programs.
This study is part of a larger study which was designed to examine long term outcomes post TBI [24]. A study objective was to examine the impact of factors such as gender and injury severity on long term outcomes. This study examines gender differences on self-reported symptoms 7 to 24 years after a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and examines gender differences in the degree to which reported symptoms present as a problem for daily functioning.
Participants
Participants were from a retrospective cohort study on long term function post TBI [24]. Participants (n = 306) had sustained a moderate to severe TBI and were discharged from a rehabilitation treatment centre in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The criteria for inclusion were: (1) participants sustained the TBI at age 14 or older; (2) participants had specific head injury ICD-8 and ICD-9 codes (800-801.9, 803-804.9, 850-854.9: concussion; cerebral laceration or contusion; subarachnoid, subdural, or extra-dural hemorrhage or injury; and fractures to the skull); (3) participants lived within a 150 mile radius from the HealthSouth Harmarville Rehabilitation Hospital in Pennsylvania. Ethics approval was granted from the research ethics boards at the University of Toronto and the Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital.
Data collection procedure
The data collection procedure is described in detail in the original study. Essentially 642 individuals identified through medical record review were eligible for an interview, but 42 were not traceable, 128 were deceased, and 82 had moved. The remaining 390 eligible individuals were sent a letter introducing the study and requesting their participation. If the individual did not wish to be contacted, they were to call the project office's confidential phone line. Seven days later a trained interviewer phoned these individuals to arrange for a home interview, at which time informed consent was obtained. Among the 390 persons eligible for an interview, 30 were lost to follow up and 52 refused. Interviews were scheduled for 308 individuals. Physical, cognitive or communication limitations prevented 22 individuals from participating in the interview. In 20 of these cases, the individual nominated a caregiver/friend/family member to complete the interview. The data used in this study was collected from interviews with 286 survivors and 20 informants.
Assessments
Information relating to demographics (e.g. age, martial status, and level of education) and injury characteristics (e.g. time since, cause, and severity) was taken from medical records and the History and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Evaluation, conducted by the admitting physicians in the rehabilitation hospital. In older records the Glasgow Coma Scale was inconsistently completed. To be consistent, information about length of unconsciousness or post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) was used to establish injury severity. Estimates of the durations of coma and PTA were derived from the admitting physician's account of the acute care phase.
The instrument used to collect the data was the Problem Checklist (PCL) from the Head Injury Family Interview (HIFI) [25]. The PCL is a two-part, self-report measure of 43 symptoms that are commonly experienced after a brain injury. In part A, participants answer 'yes' or 'no' to whether they currently experience one of the symptoms such as headaches, irritability, or forgetfulness. If the participant endorses the symptom in part A, they are then asked to rate 'how much of a problem this symptom presents in their daily functioning' (part B). Rating is done using a seven point Likert scale with one indicating 'no problem' to seven indicating 'severe problem'. Good internal validity (Cronbach's ά = 0.91 to 0.78) and construct validity (r = 0.46 to 0.37) were found [25]. Because the PCL is self-report, Kay and colleagues [25] compared reports from individuals with TBI to those obtained from family members in order to validate responses; they found significant correlations (p < 0.001) for all scales. Paniak et al [26] found the PCL was sensitive to differences in symptom reporting between individuals with TBI and those without (p < 0.001).
Analyses
Descriptive statistics were generated, such as frequency distributions, measures of central tendencies and dispersion by gender. Group differences defined by gender were produced using Chi-square for dichotomous variables and Wilcoxon two-tailed test for continuous data from Part B of the PCL. We completed analysis for multiple comparisons using Bonferonni's adjustment with correction for correlation between observations [27,28]. Significance for adjusted differences was set at p ≤ 0.025. Calculations were performed using SAS statistical software package.
Sociodemographic information
Of the 306 participants, there were 213 men and 93 women. No significant differences were found between men and women for demographic and injury-related characteristics, which are displayed in Table Table1.1. The mean age at injury was 29 for men and 32 for women and the mean age at follow-up was 43 years for men and 46 years for women. Men and women both had a mean of 14 years from time of injury to follow-up, with the range being 8-24 years for men and 7-24 years for women. Both men and women had a mean of 12 years of education prior to injury. Data on loss of consciousness (LOC) were available for most participants (182 men and 76 women). LOC for greater than 24 hours was noted for 76% of men and 70% of women. LOC for greater than one week was found in 49% of men and 47% of women. Individuals with a LOC of less than one hour included 13% of men and 17% of women.
Table 1
Table 1
Demographic and injury characteristics (Men = 213, Women = 93)
Gender differences on symptoms reported - Part A of the PCL
Women reported being forgetful (70.1%), difficulty remembering the right word (63.6%), poor balance (62.5%), visual problems (57.9%) and irritability (57.4%) most frequently. Similar findings were found for men with forgetfulness (72.6%), irritability (66.1%), poor balance (65%), doing things slowly (62.5%) and difficulty remembering the right word (58.7%) reported most frequently. A summary of gender differences on self reported symptoms in part A of the PCL can be found in Table Table2.2. Significantly more men than women reported difficulty setting realistic goals (p < 0.02), high sex drive and restlessness (p < 0.01), whereas significantly more women than men reported loss of confidence (p < 0.02) as a problem.
Table 2
Table 2
Chi-Square Gender Differences on the Problem Checklist for Symptoms Reported With Over 30% Frequency - Part A of Checklist
Gender differences in problematic symptoms - Part B of the PCL
A summary of gender differences on the mean scores from part B of the PCL can be found in Table Table3.3. For men, the five most frequently reported problems were loss of confidence, sleep difficulty, difficulty thinking clearly, needing supervision, and fatigue. For women, needing supervision, lack of initiative, difficulty planning and organizing things, difficulty thinking clearly, and difficulty setting realistic goals were the most frequently reported problems. Men reported sensitivity to noise (p < 0.02) and sleep disturbances (p < 0.02) as having a greater impact on daily functioning compared to women. Symptoms presenting significantly more of a problem in daily functioning for women compared to men was lack of initiative (p < 0.02) and needing supervision (p < 0.02).
Table 3
Table 3
Wilcoxon Gender Differences on the Problem Checklist for Symptom Impact on Daily Function - Part B of Checklist
This is the only study to our knowledge that has investigated gender differences on self reported symptoms and symptom impact on daily living many years post injury. We found several similarities on self reported symptoms between men and women but also significant differences. These differences can provide information to health care providers for the planning and delivery of care for individuals with a TBI.
Four of the five most reported symptoms were the same for men and women, highlighting similarities in symptoms experienced after TBI. These symptoms include being forgetful, irritability, poor balance, and word finding difficulties. This finding is consistent with previous studies of symptom prevalence [19,22,29]. Poor balance was the third most reported symptom for men and women after TBI which has safety implications, particularly since the main cause of brain injury in older adults is falls [2]. The diversity of self-reported symptoms reported in the chronic stage of recovery indicates the need for ongoing services to provide programming which includes cognitive, physical, psychosocial components in order to facilitate successful integration into community life.
Significantly more women reported headaches and dizziness than men. This difference is supported by previous studies with TBI survivors [19,21,22] as well as in the general population [30,31]. Therefore, the distinction found in our study may not be directly related to the injury, but rather reflect what is found in the general population. Why women comprise a larger proportion of individuals reporting these symptoms is not clear, although there is some evidence of neurophysiological factors [21,32].
Additionally, headaches can be attributed to soft tissue injury of the neck and upper body; women may be more susceptible to trauma of soft tissue during acceleration-deceleration injuries due to higher head to body mass ratio compared to men [33]. Regardless, headaches and dizziness are associated with difficulty performing daily activities [19,34,35] and vocational tasks [36,37]. As such, these symptoms should be a priority for treatment intervention, pharmacological and educational, along the continuum of care.
Men reported hearing/noise difficulties and sleep disturbances as significantly more problematic than women. Several studies have found sensitivity to noise as a prominent sequelae of TBI [20,22,38] and a factor in poor functional outcome [19,20,39]. The meta-analysis by Farace and Alves [6] found significantly more men than women reported hearing related problems. Noise sensitivity may impact social and vocational involvement and success, known areas of difficulty post TBI [3,19,40]. Clinicians may need to incorporate environmental assessments into discharge and return to work planning to detect possible noise/hearing irritants that could impact effective community integration.
Sleep disturbances are prevalent in both men and women post TBI [41-43] and can complicate recovery [44,45]. Sleep disturbances are also associated with depression, anxiety, and poor outcome on cognitive measures [44,46,47]. Self-report of sleep disturbances makes it difficult to determine whether the issue relates to the TBI itself or to secondary complications such as depression, stress or pain [48-50]. In our study men reported sleep disturbances as significantly more problematic for daily living compared to women. One explanation may be the effect of sleep deprivation on paid work as more men in our study were working outside the home than women. The literature is inconclusive regarding gender differences and subsequent causes of sleep disturbances [41,44]. Vigilance to the pervasive impact of sleep disturbances for individuals with TBI is imperative. The complex interrelationship between TBI, cognitive and psychological symptoms and sleep disturbances further supports the need for comprehensive assessment and treatment programs.
Self-report measures such as the one used in this study can capture the socio-medical perspective of health such as social influence on illness and health reporting behaviours, which may account for some of our results [51]. The fact that significantly more men reported high sex drive than women may be due to social acceptance and willingness to report rather than an organic brain disturbance caused by the injury. In addition, women reported needing supervision as significantly more problematic than men. Again, this may reflect the social pressure of sustaining care-taker and home-maker roles without feeling able to ask for assistance. Additionally, environmental constraints may affect a woman's ability to perform and balance home and community activities, thus the need for assistance [5].
A main limitation of this study is the lack of a control group to ensure symptoms reported are due to the TBI and not a reflection of differences seen in the general population. In addition, due to the many comparisons in our study, it is possible that some of our significant differences are spurious; however we did use an adjusted p value to minimize type 1 error. Further, one participant's interpretation of a symptom, such as 'thinking clearly' may be different from another's, which could influence the frequency and magnitude of symptom reporting. Self-report measures may not reflect true symptomology as measured by standardized neuro-cognitive tests; however, our goal was to document reported symptoms and their effect on daily functioning rather than measure cognitive deficits. Our participants were a minimum of seven years post injury, however the PCL was developed using a sample of individuals three years post injury; there may be differences in symptoms and symptom impact when measured at later stages of chronicity. Since some of our participants were classified with milder injury, findings may not accurately represent this sub-population.
Conclusion
In conclusion, men and women experience symptoms that are problematic many years after a TBI. We found similarities and differences in reported symptoms based on gender. Future research examining gender differences in how cognitive and physical symptoms influence community integration and performance in day to day activities would contribute to the understanding of the dynamic interaction between these concepts. Since some of our participants were classified with milder injury, findings may not accurately represent this sub-population.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
AC was responsible for the concept, design, coordination of the study as well as data analysis/interpretation and manuscript revisions.
JEH was responsible for data analysis and interpretation as well as the writing and revisions of this manuscript.
GR was responsible for the concept, design, and coordination of the study and manuscript approval.
SC was responsible for the concept, design, and coordination of the study as well as manuscript approval.
KE was responsible for preliminary data analysis and interpretation and manuscript approval.
Pre-publication history
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
Acknowledgements
Funding for this study was obtained from NINDS (NS34740-2), NIA (F33 AGO5856-01A1), Washington County Brain Injury Association, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute. Support for this study was given to JEH in a CIHR Fellowship Award and a Strategic Training Fellowship in Health Care, Technology and Place (FRN: STP 53911).
  • Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations and Deaths 2002-2006. 2010.
  • Colantonio A, Croxford R, Farooq S, Laporte A, Coyte PC. Trends in hospitalization associated with traumatic brain injury in a publicly insured population, 1992-2002. J Trauma. 2009;66(1):179–183. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181715d66. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Corrigan JD, Selassie AW, Orman JA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(2):72–80. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181ccc8b4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Myburgh JA, Cooper DJ, Finfer SR, Venkatesh B, Jones D, Higgins A, Bishop N, Higlett T. Australasian Traumatic Brain Injury Study (ATBIS) Investigators for the Australian, New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Epidemiology and 12-month outcomes from traumatic brain injury in australia and new zealand. J Trauma. 2008;64(4):854–862. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180340e77. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tate DG, Roller S, Riley B. Quality of life for women with physical disabilities. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2001;12(1):23–37. [PubMed]
  • Farace E, Alves WM. Do women fare worse: a metaanalysis of gender differences in traumatic brain injury outcome. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(4):539–545. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.4.0539. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Slewa-Younan S, van den Berg S, Baguley IJ, Nott M, Cameron ID. Towards an understanding of sex differences in functional outcome following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(11):1197–1201. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.147983. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Doninger NA, Heinemann AW, Bode RK, Sokol K, Corrigan JD. Predicting community integration following traumatic brain injury with health and cognitive status measures. Rehabil Psych. 2003;48:67. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.48.2.67. [Cross Ref]
  • Reid-Arndt SA, Nehl C, Hinkebein J. The Frontal Systems Behaviour Scale (FrSBe) as a predictor of community integration following a traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007;21(13-14):1361–1369. doi: 10.1080/02699050701785062. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mushkudiani NA, Engel DC, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Lu J, Marmarou A, Slieker F, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Maas AI. Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):259–269. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0028. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ponsford JL, Myles PS, Cooper DJ, Mcdermott FT, Murray LJ, Laidlaw J, Cooper G, Tremayne AB, Bernard SA. Gender differences in outcome in patients with hypotension and severe traumatic brain injury. Injury. 2008;39(1):67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.08.028. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Green AM, Baguley IJ, Gurka JA, Marosszeky JE. Sex differences in injury severity and outcome measures after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:376–379. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.05.007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Barr WB. Neuropsychological testing of high school athletes. Preliminary norms and test-retest indices. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18(1):91–101. [PubMed]
  • Niemeier JP, Marwitz JH, Lesher K, Walker WC, Bushnik T. Gender differences in executive functions following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007;17(3):293–313. doi: 10.1080/09602010600814729. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Putukian M, Echemendia RJ, Mackin S. The acute neuropsychological effects of heading in soccer: a pilot study. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10(2):104–109. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200004000-00004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Himanen L, Portin R, Isoniemi H, Helenius H, Kurki T, Tenovuo O. Longitudinal cognitive changes in traumatic brain injury: a 30-year follow-up study. Neurology. 2006;66(2):187–192. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000194264.60150.d3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ratcliff JJ, Greenspan AI, Goldstein FC, Stringer AY, Bushnik T, Hammond FM, Novack TA, Whyte J, Wright DW. Gender and traumatic brain injury: do the sexes fare differently? Brain Inj. 2007;21(10):1023–1030. doi: 10.1080/02699050701633072. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schopp L, Shigaki C, Johnstone B, Kirlpatrick H. Gender differences in cognitive and emotional adjustment to traumatic brain injury. J Clin Psych Med Setting. 2001;8:181. doi: 10.1023/A:1011369620254. [Cross Ref]
  • Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Mellick D, Harrison-Felix C, Terrill MS, Noble K. Population-based estimates of outcomes after hospitalization for traumatic brain injury in Colorado. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4 Suppl 2):S73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dischinger PC, Ryb GE, Kufera JA, Auman KM. Early predictors of postconcussive syndrome in a population of trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2009;66(2):289–96. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181961da2. discussion 296-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hibbard MR, Uysal S, Sliwinski M, Gordon WA. Undiagnosed health issues in individuals with traumatic brain injury living in the community. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(4):47–57. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199808000-00005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kraus J, Hsu P, Schaffer K, Vaca F, Ayers K, Kennedy F, Afifi AA. Preinjury factors and 3-month outcomes following emergency department diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(5):344–354. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181ae35fd. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bay E, Sikorskii A, Saint-Arnault D. Sex differences in depressive symptoms and their correlates after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs. 2009;41(6):298–309. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0b013e3181b6be81. quiz 310-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, Kelsey S, Escobar M, Vernich L. Long-term outcomes after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(5):253–261. doi: 10.1080/09638280310001639722. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kay T, Cavallo M, Ezrachi O, Vavagiakis P. The head injury family interview: A clinical and research tool. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10:12. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199504000-00004. [Cross Ref]
  • Paniak C, Phillips K, Toller-Lobe G, Durand A, Nagy J. Sensitivity of three recent questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury-related effects. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(3):211–219. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199906000-00002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pavur R. Type I error rates for multiple comparison procedures with dependent data. The Am Statistician. 1988;42:171–173. doi: 10.2307/2684994. [Cross Ref]
  • Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Statistic Med. 1997;16:2529–2542. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971130)16:22<2529::AID-SIM692>3.0.CO;2-J. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tennant A, Macdermott N, Neary D. The long-term outcome of head injury: implications for service planning. Brain Inj. 1995;9(6):595–60. doi: 10.3109/02699059509008218. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Langely RL. Sex and gender differences in health and disease. North Carolina, Carolina: Academic Press; 2003.
  • Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H. Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(4):617–624. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00335-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rees PM. Contemporary issues in mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(12):1885–1894. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.03.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bell KR, Pepping M. Women and traumatic brain injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2001;12(1):169–182. [PubMed]
  • Asikainen I, Kaste M, Sarna S. Predicting late outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury referred to a rehabilitation programme: a study of 508 Finnish patients 5 years or more after injury. Brain Inj. 1998;12(2):95–107. doi: 10.1080/026990598122737. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McCauley SR, Boake C, Levin HS, Contant CF, Song JX. Postconcussional disorder following mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: anxiety, depression, and social support as risk factors and comorbidities. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23(6):792–808. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.6.792.1016. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ownsworth T, McKenna K. Investigation of factors related to employment outcome following traumatic brain injury: a critical review and conceptual model. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(13):765–783. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001696700. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ruffolo CF, Friedland JF, Dawson DR, Colantonio A, Lindsay PH. Mild traumatic brain injury from motor vehicle accidents: factors associated with return to work. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(4):392–398. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90275-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Attias J, Zwecker-Lazar I, Nageris B, Keren O, Groswasser Z. Dysfunction of the auditory efferent system in patients with traumatic brain injuries with tinnitus and hyperacusis. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;16(2-3):117–126. [PubMed]
  • Bohnen N, Twijnstra A, Jolles J. Post-traumatic and emotional symptoms in different subgroups of patients with mild head injury. Brain Inj. 1992;6(6):481–487. doi: 10.3109/02699059209008145. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Whelan-Goodinson R, Ponsford J, Schonberger M. Association between psychiatric state and outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):850–857. [PubMed]
  • Baumann CR, Werth E, Stocker R, Ludwig S, Bassetti CL. Sleep-wake disturbances 6 months after traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 7):1873–1883. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm109. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Parcell DL, Ponsford JL, Rajaratnam SM, Redman JR. Self-reported changes to nighttime sleep after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(2):278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.024. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zeitzer JM, Friedman L, O'Hara R. Insomnia in the context of traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(6):827–836. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2008.08.0099. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mahmood O, Rapport LJ, Hanks RA, Fichtenberg NL. Neuropsychological performance and sleep disturbance following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;19(5):378–390. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200409000-00003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Worthington AD, Melia Y. Rehabilitation is compromised by arousal and sleep disorders: results of a survey of rehabilitation centres. Brain Inj. 2006;20(3):327–332. doi: 10.1080/02699050500488249. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bloomfield IL, Espie CA, Evans JJ. Do sleep difficulties exacerbate deficits in sustained attention following traumatic brain injury? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16(1):17–25. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709990798. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Orff HJ, Ayalon L, Drummond SP. Traumatic brain injury and sleep disturbance: a review of current research. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(3):155–165. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181a0b281. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kim E, Lauterbach EC, Reeve A, Arciniegas DB, Coburn KL, Mendez MF, Rummans TA, Coffey EC. ANPA Committee on Research. Neuropsychiatric complications of traumatic brain injury: a critical review of the literature (a report by the ANPA Committee on Research) J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;19(2):106–127. [PubMed]
  • Moore EL, Terryberry-Spohr L, Hope DA. Mild traumatic brain injury and anxiety sequelae: a review of the literature. Brain Inj. 2006;20(2):117–132. doi: 10.1080/02699050500443558. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nampiaparampil DE. Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;300(6):711–719. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.6.711. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Verbrugge LM. The twain meet: empirical explanations of sex differences in health and mortality. J Health Soc Behav. 1989;30(3):282–304. doi: 10.2307/2136961. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Articles from BMC Neurology are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central