PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Nat Struct Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Dec 21, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3006182
NIHMSID: NIHMS223260
Helicobacter pylori CagA Inhibits PAR1/MARK Family Kinases by Mimicking Host Substrates
Dragana Neišić,1 Marshall C. Miller,1 Zachary T. Quinkert,2 Markus Stein,3 Brian T. Chait,2 and C. Erec Stebbins1
1Laboratory of Structural Microbiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065
2Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065
3Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H7
Correspondence should be addressed to C.E.S. (stebbins/at/rockefeller.edu)
Abstract
The CagA protein of Helicobacter pylori interacts with numerous cellular factors, and is associated with increased virulence and risk of gastric carcinoma. We present here the co-crystal structure of a subdomain of CagA with the human kinase PAR1b/MARK2, revealing that a CagA peptide mimics substrates of this kinase family, resembling eukaryotic protein kinase inhibitors. Mutagenesis of conserved residues central to this interaction renders CagA inactive as an inhibitor of MARK2.
Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the human population1,2 and has been closely linked to duodenal and gastric ulcers and adenocarcinomas1. CagA is injected by H. pylori into the epithelial cells lining the stomach3-8. Critical to many of the identified biological effects of the molecule on host cells, is the so-called “repeats domain,” a region with a strain-specific number of contiguous repeats of a 30-40 residue segment containing the EPIYA amino acid motif (Fig. 1a)7. The repeats domain interacts with and inhibits the PAR1/MARK (partitioning defective and MAP/microtubule affinity regulating kinases) family of protein serine/threonine kinases9-11.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall Structure of the CagA-MARK2 Complex. (a) Schematic representation of CagA. The A, B, and C EPIYA sequence repeats are shown as blue boxes. The crystallized construct (885-1005) and the deletion mutant used in binding studies that lacks one of (more ...)
In order to understand the mechanism of CagA inhibition of PAR1/MARK kinases, we determined the 2.2 Å crystal structure of MARK2 in complex with a sub-domain of CagA spanning residues 885-1005 of Western H. pylori strain 26695, containing the A, B, and C EPIYA repeats (Fig. 1, a and b, Table 1, and Supplementary Methods). Surprisingly, the majority of this 120 amino acid CagA domain was not visible in the crystals (although highly stable in complex with MARK2, and verified to be present by SDS-PAGE analysis of crystals, Supplementary Fig. 1a). In particular, the EPIYA motifs were disordered, and only a short 14 amino acid peptide possessed interpretable electron density (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1b). The peptide does not adopt any clear secondary structure, but interacts with the kinase as an extended coil, burying approximately 950 Å2 of surface area.
Table 1
Table 1
Data collection and refinement statistics (molecular replacement)
Two significant differences are present between the unbound12 and the CagA-bound forms of MARK2, and both are structural hallmarks of kinases in their fully activated state. The first difference is an overall hinge motion between the N and C-terminal lobes of the kinase that brings them closer together in the presence of CagA (Supplementary Fig. 1c). This hinge motion is the same in each of the four independent copies of MARK2 in the asymmetric unit, making it unlikely that this is due to crystal packing. The second major difference is in the activation loop of the kinase, which adopts an ordered and activated structure in the presence of CagA (Fig. 1c)13-16, including the conformation of the canonical Asp-Phe-Gly (DFG) motif that is required for magnesium binding, and the position of a threonine (Thr208 in MARK2) that is phosphorylated by activating kinases. These conformational states are remarkable for the fact that there is no nucleotide or magnesium present in the crystals, and no phosphorylation of Thr208.
What makes this activated conformation of the kinase possible, even in the absence of several elements normally required, is the CagA peptide. The visible peptide spans the sequence FPLKRHDKVDDLSK, a repeat motif occurring twice in the crystallized construct. The peptide visible in the crystals, and which we show to be sufficient for inhibition of the kinase, we have termed “MKI,” for MARK2 Kinase Inhibitor, in analogy to PKI that inhibits PKA (vide infra).
Because the MKI sequence occurs twice in the crystallized construct, and only the amino acids common to both repeats are visible, it was unclear from the crystal structure which of the two possible peptide regions is binding (the first or second repeat of the MKI sequence). We addressed this issue through a combination of gel filtration chromatography and native mass spectrometry. These results (Supplementary Figs. 2-5, and Supplementary Tables 1-3) clearly demonstrate that each MKI sequence is bound by a molecule of MARK2.
The MKI peptide of CagA occupies the substrate-binding site of the kinase that is located near the interface between the N- and C-terminal lobes of the enzyme, using several amino acids to mimic conserved features of the PAR1 and AMPK family substrates (Fig. 2, a and b). The peptide is anchored to the kinase by four primary residues: Leu950, Arg952, Val956 and Leu959, numbering from the first repeat (Fig. 2a). Hydrophobic residues, especially leucine, are highly conserved at the corresponding positions in PAR1/MARK family kinase substrates (Fig. 2b), and the arginine at position 952 is also very well conserved. Several secondary interactions further stabilize the interaction - Phe948, His953, and Lys955, the last of which positions its terminal nitrogen atom in a location that mimics magnesium, forming hydrogen bonds with Asp193 of the MARK2 DFG motif (Fig. 2a). Overall, seven out of fourteen side-chains in the peptide interact with the kinase.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CagA is a Pathogenic Mimic of Host Substrates. (a) Details of the CagA peptide interaction. MARK2 in blue with cyan side-chains, while the MKI peptide of CagA in yellow. (b) Alignment of PAR1/MARK and AMPK family substrates with CagA peptide and, for (more ...)
Intriguingly, the manner in which the CagA MKI sequence binds in the substrate-binding cleft is remarkably reminiscent of the manner in which PKI binds to and inhibits PKA (Fig. 2c, refs15,16). A superposition of the two kinases bound to their inhibitors reveals that CagA residues 951-956 possess an overlapping main-chain conformation to residues 17-22 of PKI, and bind in a very similar location with respect to PKI in PKA (Fig. 2c). In addition to the location and main-chain conformational analogies, several side-chains of these kinase inhibitors interact with their targets in similar ways. For example, Arg18 of PKI is located very comparably to Arg952 of CagA (Fig. 2c), and both residues make hydrogen bonds with a conserved glutamic acid nearly identically positioned in the two kinases (Glu127 in PKA, and Glu136 in MARK2). Both peptides also use a short hydrophobic residue at the position of CagA Val956 (Ile22 in PKI) to insert into a conserved hydrophobic pocket in the kinases (Fig. 2c).
To test the importance of these side-chain interactions, a series of mutants were created in the MKI sequence of CagA. In order to prevent the second MKI sequence from biasing results, these mutants were made in a construct in which one MKI site was deleted (the construct spanning residues 885-981, see Fig. 1a), as well as in synthetic peptides corresponding to the minimal region defined by the crystal structure. Hexa-histidine–tagged CagA mutants were first examined for binding and co-elution with un-tagged MARK2 from Ni-NTA (Fig. 3a). Point mutations of key anchoring residues, such as L950G and L959G, completely abolished binding to MARK2. The R952G mutant exhibited weak binding (Fig. 3a), but interaction was highly unstable, however, and the complex was disrupted by ion exchange chromatography. The mutation V956G almost completely eradicated binding to MARK2, highlighting the importance of this hydrophobic interaction with the kinase. We also created two MARK2 mutants, encompassing CagA interacting residues E136G, F138G, and D139G in one construct (EFD), and L248G and D251G in the second (LD). EFD mutations completely abolished interaction between MARK2 and CagA, consistent with their interaction with key CagA binding residues (Leu950 and Arg952), whereas the LD mutants did not.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mutational analysis of MKI mutants. (a) Binding of wild type or mutant hexahistidine-tagged CagA(885-981) to wild type or mutant MARK2(39-364) was assayed by pull-down experiments on Ni-NTA sepharose columns. Eluted material was subjected to SDS-PAGE (more ...)
Both basal MARK2 kinase activity (Fig. 3b), as well as activated kinase activity using MARKK (Fig. 3c), were tested in vitro in the presence of varying concentrations of short peptides containing the wild type and mutant constructs of the MKI sequence. Synthetic peptides of CagA containing mutations in key interacting residues (Leu950, Arg952, Val956, or Leu959) failed to inhibit kinase activity except at extremely high concentrations (100μM). In contrast, the wild type peptide and the K955G mutant were very efficient inhibitors of MARK2. Intriguingly, the K955G peptide was a slightly more potent inhibitor of MARK2 than wild type (Fig. 3c, d). Supporting this data, East-Asian CagA subtypes contain glycine in the position that corresponds to Lys955 in Western CagA, and it has been reported that MARK2 binds more strongly to the East Asian CagA repeats region17.
This structure reveals that CagA mimics host substrates, using a short, 14 amino acid peptide (MKI) to bind to the kinase substrate-binding site (see also Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Figure 6). Our biochemical experiments demonstrate that this peptide alone is sufficient to inhibit MARK2. In a dramatic example of convergent evolution, H. pylori has evolved a peptide to mimic host substrates of this kinase family in order to manipulate eukaryotic cellular biochemistry during infection.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank D. Oren and W. Shi for access to and assistance with crystallographic equipment. This work was funded in part by NIH grants AI052182 (to C.E.S.) and RR00862, RR022220 (to B.T.C), and by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant (MOP-62779) to M.S. M.S. is an AHFMR Research Scholar.
Footnotes
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS D.N. performed all molecular biology, cloning, protein purification, functional assays, and crystallization, Z.T.Q. performed mass spectroscopy under the guidance of B.T.C., M.C.M. collected crystallographic data along with D.N., and C.E.S. solved the structure. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Accession codes. Protein Data Bank: Coordinates for the CagA-MARK2 complex have been deposited with accession code 3IEC.
1. Peek RM, Jr, Blaser MJ. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:28–37. [PubMed]
2. Censini S, Stein M, Covacci A. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001;4:41–6. [PubMed]
3. Asahi M, et al. J Exp Med. 2000;191:593–602. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Backert S, et al. Cell Microbiol. 2000;2:155–64. [PubMed]
5. Odenbreit S, et al. Science. 2000;287:1497–500. [PubMed]
6. Stein M, Rappuoli R, Covacci A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:1263–8. [PubMed]
7. Covacci A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:5791–5. [PubMed]
8. Tummuru MK, Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Infect Immun. 1993;61:1799–809. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Saadat I, et al. Nature. 2007;447:330–3. [PubMed]
10. Zeaiter Z, et al. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:781–94. [PubMed]
11. Higashi H, et al. Science. 2002;295:683–6. [PubMed]
12. Panneerselvam S, Marx A, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E. Structure. 2006;14:173–83. [PubMed]
13. Huse M, Kuriyan J. Cell. 2002;109:275–82. [PubMed]
14. Russo AA, Jeffrey PD, Pavletich NP. Nat Struct Biol. 1996;3:696–700. [PubMed]
15. Zheng J, et al. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1993;49:362–5. [PubMed]
16. Knighton DR, et al. Science. 1991;253:414–20. [PubMed]
17. Lu HS, et al. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:2004–11. [PubMed]