The present study serves two purposes in the research of C. elegans fat storage. The first is to ascertain the organelle nature of fat storage structures. The second is to carefully compare the different vital and post-fix staining methods that aimed to label fat storage structures.
This work is based on our previous study in which we demonstrated that the enlarged spherical structures found in peroxisomal β-oxidation mutants were lipid droplets [
21]. It was unclear at that time whether lipid droplets formed only when peroxisomal function was attenuated in
C. elegans. In this paper, we provided three lines of evidence, namely, electron microscopy, biochemical isolation, vital and post-fix lipophilic dye staining and fluorescence imaging, to demonstrate that lipid droplets are ubiquitous fat storage organelles in
C. elegans. First, we showed that in wild-type
C. elegans, at an ultrastructural level, lipid droplets were uniformly electron-translucent structures delimited by a phospholipid monolayer membrane. This ultrastructural characteristic was previously documented for large lipid droplets in peroxisomal β-oxidation mutants in
C. elegans [
21], lipid droplets in the budding yeast [
25], and lipid droplets in mammalian cells [
3,
26]. Such characteristic is regarded as a hallmark of lipid droplets [
1,
2]. Second, since lipid droplets are loaded with neutral fat such as TAG and CE, their density is much lower than water and most other intracellular organelles. This physical property allows density centrifugation-based isolation of lipid droplets from yeast and mammalian cells [
3,
22,
23,
25]. We developed a similar approach and isolated lipid droplets from wild-type and peroxisomal β-oxidation mutant
C. elegans. And we found that the isolated lipid droplets were labelled by BODIPY. Third, we confirmed previous findings that LROs were the major organelles labelled by BODIPY and Nile Red in live animals. Nevertheless, we found that Nile Red labelled lipid droplets in live peroxisomal β-oxidation mutants, and its fluorescence emission spectrum was distinct from that of Nile Red in LROs. Nile Red emission spectrum shift was previously documented as neutral fat-dependent [
27]. The emission spectrum shift was also found to be specific to lipid droplets in mammalian macrophages [
28].
Our identification of lipid droplets as the fat storage organelles in
C. elegans has important implications for the principles and validity of previous fat staining methods. As shown in this study and several previous studies, Nile Red and BODIPY label LROs in live wild-type
C. elegans [
7,
8,
19,
21]. In addition, we showed that BODIPY but not Nile Red can label lipid droplets in wild-type
C. elegans. Since the absence of LROs in
glo mutants does not alter TAG levels [
19], LROs are unlikely to be the sites of fat storage. Thus, fluorescence intensities of BODIPY or Nile Red vital staining cannot be used as a sole indicator of fat levels. This view agrees with those of two previous reports [
8,
20]. Why does BODIPY label both LROs and lipid droplets and why does Nile Red label only LROs in wild-type
C. elegans? Vital dyes are applied onto the
E. coli lawn and ingested by
C. elegans into the gut lumen. It is plausible that the vital dyes are endocytosed, recycled, and delivered to lysosomes for degradation in gut epithelial cells [
7,
29-
31]. BODIPY is different from Nile Red in that it is conjugated to a fatty acid moiety. In mammalian cells, fatty acids and fatty acid moieties are released from lysosomes and targeted to lipid droplets [
32]. It appears that a similar process happens for BODIPY fatty acid analogs but not for Nile Red in wild-type
C. elegans (Figure ). Why does Nile Red as well as BODIPY label lipid droplets besides LROs when peroxisomal β-oxidation is impaired? The exact mechanism is currently unknown. The peroxisomal β-oxidation pathway and endolysosomal pathway genetically interact to affect larval development and body length (unpublished data). Similar genetic interactions may underlie the trafficking of Nile Red from endosomes and/or lysosomes to lipid droplets (Figure ). Physical contact between peroxisomes and lipid droplets may also be involved [
33]. Why do the two post-fix methods reveal fat levels more closely [
8,
20]? The post-fix labelling methods involve permeating cell membrane and intracellular membrane invasively by isopropanol and/or freeze/thaw treatments [
8,
20]. The delivery of Nile Red and Oil-Red-O to lipid droplets thus bypasses the endolysosomal pathway and LROs. The post-fix staining procedure may also compromise the integrity of LROs and make them un-stainable.
The present study should allow re-interpretation of previous studies in
C. elegans fat research and guide the design of future qualitative and quantitative studies of lipid droplets. For example, we showed that BODIPY could label lipid droplets with low intensity in live wild-type animals while Nile Red and BODIPY could label both large and small lipid droplets in live peroxisomal β-oxidation mutant animals. Our results highlight the complexity of intracellular trafficking of lipophilic dyes which should be examined carefully. On one hand, it suggests that mutants showing changes in vital Nile Red and BODIPY fluorescence intensity may actually have alterations in lysosome/LRO proliferation or function. On the other hand, it lends support to the use of these two vital dyes for lipid droplet labelling in peroxisomal mutant animals and animals of other yet unexplored genetic backgrounds, provided that independent methods are available to distinguish lipid droplets from LROs. Because of the dual labelling by BODIPY in our peroxisomal β-oxidation mutants, we previously opted for GC-MS to gauge fat levels and we measured volumes instead of fluorescence intensities to study lipid droplets larger than 3 μm in diameter [
21]. The spectral imaging of Nile Red and the post-fix Nile Red staining should now allow measurement of volumes of lipid droplets of all sizes. We also anticipate that, before their acceptance as alternative live imaging techniques for fat levels in
C. elegans, label-free imaging approaches based on Raman scattering [
11] should be subjected to rigorous analyses using a combination of genetic manipulation of lipid droplets and LROs, biochemical isolation, spectral analysis, electron microscopy, and lipid analytical chemistry.