Up to one third of adults and half of children with the AIDS eventually have neurologic complications, which are directly attributable to infection of the brain by HIV-1. Neurologic problems include impaired mental concentration, slowness of hand movements, and difficulty in walking, all important clinical manifestations of HAND (
Antinori et al., 2007;
Letendre et al., 2007). Following the wide spread use of antiretroviral drugs, the severity of disease has diminished. With major and sustained declines in opportunistic complications, HIV infection is increasingly becoming a more chronic disease (
Letendre et al., 2007). Therefore, as ART are used more commonly and over longer time periods, drug toxicities become an increasingly important issue in the management of infected patients (
Carr, 2003) with increasing research activities now focused on developing adjunctive treatments for disease (
Perry et al., 2005;
Pett and Emery, 2001). As the major factors involved in inducing neural injury in HAND are viral and cellular products secreted by immune competent mononuclear phagocytes, immunomodulatory drugs that combat those released factors are heralded for their abilities to improve neuronal function, synaptic and dendritic degeneration, and prevent neuronal apoptosis (
Garden, 2002;
Schifitto et al., 2006). Treatments that interfere with neuroinflammation or that protect neurons from damage can be expected to have a positive effect in the pathogenesis of HAND.
Can Treg be considered as a proposed treatment for HAND? Treg numbers are limited, being present in only 5–10% of the mature CD4+ T cell pool in mice and less than 5% in humans and therefore restrict the functional analysis and clinical application of such cells. Greater numbers of Tregs would be necessary for intervention, thus requiring
in vivo or
ex vivo expansion of existing Treg numbers or activity. To this end and in order to considerably increase the number of Treg, methods of polyclonal or antigen-specific
in vitro expansion of both murine and human CD4+CD25+ Treg were developed and are known to exert fundamental control over a range of immune responses. Data generated in preclinical animal models indicate that adoptive transfer of Treg prevents or ameliorates several T cell-mediated disorders, including autoimmune diseases and allograft rejection, by regulating immune tolerance to self antigens (
Battaglia et al., 2006;
Hoffmann et al., 2002;
Tarbell et al., 2007). The advantages of Treg adoptive transfer compared to other treatments are numerous and include: 1) the potential for antigen specificity with the lack of general immunosuppression; 2) the possibility of inducing natural and accurate long-lasting physiological regulation
in vivo; and 3) the fact that Treg-based immunotherapy could be a custom-made product, designed for each patient, with very limited side effects (
Roncarolo and Battaglia, 2007). Recent studies in others and our own laboratories have shown that Treg modulate inflammation, attenuate microglial activation, and promote neuronal survival in neurodegeneration diseases (
Hara et al., 2001;
Reynolds et al., 2009a;
Reynolds et al., 2009b). Thus, we theorized that Treg could be used in therapy for neurodegenerative disorders by regulating neuroinflammatory responses. However, relatively few
in vivo studies have assessed the ability of adoptively-transferred Treg to migrate to target sites involved in disease or biological function. Herein, we developed an HIVE animal model and used dual-labeled Treg to assess whether they reach a targeted site. As Treg are thought to function by cell-cell contact, a critical parameter of cell-based therapies would be to estimate whether there are adequate numbers of Treg available to penetrate the inflammatory target site induced by HIV-1, and also to estimate whether excess Treg that are not necessary to host protection were depleted
in vivo. To determine if Treg could migrate to the inflammation area in brain, we tracked GFP+ Treg using immuofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy, and found that Treg infiltrated the CNS BBB and remained exactly at the sites of brain inflammation in HIVE, which is congruent with the notion that Treg function in a cell–cell contact dependent manner (
Bluestone and Tang, 2005).
Using CT/SPECT for assessment of migration and distribution of adoptively transferred
111In-labeled cells
in vivo (
Bennink et al., 2004), we showed that radioactivity in lungs was greater at 2 h post-transfer compared with that in spleen and liver. By day 1 and times thereafter, radioactivity decreased in lungs and increased in spleen and liver; however, no significant differences were detected between HIVE and PBS sham-operated mice. Similarly, by γ-scintillation spectrometry and histological examination results, no significant differences were observed in the distribution of adoptively transferred Treg in HIVE and control animals. Comparable radioactivity results amongst HIVE and sham control mice demonstrate the test’s level of sensitivity to ascertain small changes in cell ingress within the CNS compared to the periphery. Importantly, despite radioactivity results that would suggest the persistence of Treg over 72 hours in the liver and spleen, the numbers of Treg in those tissues detected by immunofluorescence diminished by over an order of magnitude. This contrasts significantly to the brain; wherein, Treg infiltrated HIVE affected brain regions and were retained in sites of viral-induced inflammation. This seemingly paradoxical result between the imaging data and immunohistochemical evaluations likely reflected increased leakage of radiolabel from the adoptively-transferred Treg that have been noted in other replicate systems (
Botti et al., 1997;
Kuyama et al., 1997;
Ritchie et al., 2007).
The experiments showed herein used an efficient method to expand polyclonal murine Treg up to 300-fold within 3 weeks. Expanded Treg maintained their phenotype and suppressive capacity but showed increased activity compared with freshly isolated cells. On a functional level, Treg expanded by anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads differed in their capacity to produce IL-10. Anti-CD3/anti-CD28 stimulation usually generates high levels of IL-10 in murine, as well as in human, Treg (
Levings et al., 2001;
Tang et al., 2004). IL-10-mediated inhibition of cytokine production is believed to act by inhibition of the antigen presentation capacity of macrophages and dendritic cells, blockade of cytokine production and chemokine secretion, thus limiting the magnitude of immune responses (
Fiorentino et al., 1989;
Pestka et al., 2004). Kootstra showed that IL-10 inhibits HIV-1 replication specifically in macrophages, but not T cells, in a dose-dependent manner, that seemed to involve inhibition of viral protein processing (
Kootstra et al., 1994). Similarly, TGF-β regulates adaptive immune components, such as T cells (
Wan and Flavell, 2007), as well as innate immune components, such as natural killer (NK) cells (
Ghiringhelli et al., 2006;
Ralainirina et al., 2007;
Wahl, 2007). Regulation of immune responses by TGF-β proceeds by inhibition of inflammatory cell function and promotion of Treg function (
Wan and Flavell, 2008), the latter through induction of Foxp3 expression, which is implicated in Treg function (
Komatsu et al., 2009). Taken together, these data indicate that CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg retained their phenotype and function after
in vitro expansions.
Substantial progress in understanding the biology of Treg and their roles in HAND has led to increasing interests in their potential utility as adjunct biological therapies in HIV disease. However, as in most cellular therapeutic strategies, risks of uncontrolled proliferation and/or development of unforeseen functional activities pose potential limitations. This is underscored by the observation that some Treg lose Foxp3 expression and convert to conventional T cells (
Komatsu et al., 2009). Another concern for Treg-based therapeutics is that given the potency by which Treg function, excess Tregs could truncate immune responses necessary for surveillance of neoplasia and control of microbial infections. In the context of HIV disease, Tregs used to therapeutically control inflammation associated with neuroAIDS may inhibit the same immune responses that maintain control of viral loads and thus lead to acute viral relapses under otherwise chronic disease states (
Fantini et al., 2004;
Nelson, 2004). Nevertheless, Food and Drug Administration mandates for demonstrable reproducibility and control for sterility, purity, and potency of an exact defined cell therapy product present formidable barriers to clinical translation. In our study, we found that extra adoptive transferred Treg within non-inflamed tissues were depleted; whereas, Treg within inflamed sites in HIVE mice were indeed neuroprotective. Thus taken together, our results demonstrate the importance of Treg in HAND control and raise the possibility of their utility for therapeutic strategies.