PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of tagLink to Publisher's site
 
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2009 July; 2(4 Suppl): 5–8.
PMCID: PMC3002530

Altering the Gastrointestinal Flora in Patients with Functional Bowel Disorders: A Way Ahead?

Abstract

Functional gastrointestinal disorders are very common in the Western world, but unfortunately the underlying mechanisms behind these disorders are incompletely understood. Treatment options are limited and the economic consequences for society are profound. Recent data suggest an involvement of bacteria in the pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Probiotics are promising new treatment alternatives, which will be reviewed in this supplement.

Keywords: functional gastrointestinal disorders, probiotics, irritable bowel syndrome

Introduction

Functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are defined as a variable combination of chronic or recurrent GI symptoms, attributed to different parts of the GI tract, which is not explained by structural or biochemical alterations; that is, without clear explanation found on routine investigations [Drossman, 2006]. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) — one of the functional bowel disorders — is one of the most common functional GI disorders, affecting 10–15% of the general population [Vandvik et al. 2006; Agreus et al. 1995] and constitute a significant part of the workload for both gastroenterologists and primary care physicians [Thompson et al. 2000; Harvey et al. 1983]. IBS is characterized by abdominal pain and/or discomfort related to an abnormal bowel pattern [Longstreth et al. 2006]. Other prominent symptoms often seen in these patients are bloating, visible abdominal distension, incomplete bowel emptying, urgency and excessive straining. Moreover, overlap with upper GI symptoms, as part of a more widespread functional GI symptom complex, is very common [Corsetti et al. 2004], as well as coexisting extraintestinal symptoms such as muscle pain, headache, sleep disturbances, urogenital symptoms and fatigue [Maxton et al. 1991]. Health-related quality of life in IBS patients is reduced [Simrén et al. 2004] and is often more severely impaired in patients with a functional GI disorder than in groups of patients with an organic GI disease [Simrén et al. 2006]. Unfortunately, the understanding of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of these disorders is limited and there are few effective treatment options [Spiller et al. 2007]. Moreover, healthcare consumption in this group of patients is high, and since IBS is a very common, chronic disorder with severe symptoms, the economic consequences of the disorder are profound [Wells et al. 1997].

In order to improve the management of these patients, a better understanding of disease mechanisms involved in the generation of symptoms in IBS patients is needed. This will potentially lead to new treatment alternatives. Recent studies suggest a potential role of altered gut flora in IBS and there are promising treatment trials using probiotics. In this supplement, presentations given at a recent symposium exploring the potential role of bacteria in the pathophysiology of IBS and the usefulness of treatment with probiotics are summarized.

Aetiology and pathogenesis of IBS

ThecausesofIBS arelargely unknown, whichisan obvious dilemma in the search for new therapeutic options. However, there are some known risk factors for developing IBS, but for the individual patient it is often impossible to give information about the cause of their specific symptoms. One of the most well-established risk factors for developing IBS is having an infectious gastroenteritis [Halvorson et al. 2006], especially if the subject has psychological symptoms at the time of the infection [Gwee et al. 1999]. Moreover, psychological factors and stress per se seem to be a risk factor for developing IBS, as many patients report onset of their disorder during a period in their life with stress or poor psychological well-being [Ford et al. 1987]. There also seems to be a genetic component of IBS, as suggested by aggregation of symptoms compatible with a functional bowel disorder in families [Saito et al. 2008] and the fact that concordance for IBS is greater in monozygotic than in dizygotic twins [Levy et al. 2001]. However, social learning has also been proposed to contribute to the development of IBS and can partly explain the aggregation of IBS in families [Levy et al. 2000].

Pathophysiology of IBS

The pathophysiology of IBS is complex and most probably multifactorial [Ohman and Simrén, 2007]. Historically, IBS has been considered to be a disorder of altered GI motility, but even though motility alterations do exist in a subset of IBS patients [Camilleri et al. 2008; Chey et al. 2001; Simrén et al. 2000], no uniform motility pattern has been found and a clear relationship with the different symptoms has been hard to demonstrate. Visceral hypersensitivity is probably one of the most important pathophysiological factors in IBS [Mertz et al. 1995], even though its relevance has to some extent been questioned recently [Naliboff et al. 2006]. However, recent studies have demonstrated an association between the presence of visceral hypersensitivity and severity of IBS symptoms, especially pain and bloating [Kanazawaet al. 2008; Posserud et al. 2007], but it also seems clear that other factors are equally or even more relevant for the symptom pattern. Psychosocial factors, stress and maladaptive coping styles are most certainly of great importance for the symptom severity of IBS patients [Drossman et al. 2000; Whitehead et al. 1992], and recent studies indicate differences between IBS patients and healthy controls in activation of different pain processing regions in the brain [Hobson and Aziz, 2004]. Taken together, much of the current evidence points in the direction of IBS being a disorder of dysregulation of the brain—gut axis, with peripheral alterations probably dominating in some patients and disturbed central processing of signals from the periphery dominating in others [Ohman and Simrén, 2007; Posserud et al. 2006].

Treatment options for IBS

As stated above, effective treatment options for IBS are limited. There are treatment alternatives for individual symptoms such as diarrhoea, constipation and abdominal pain, but none of the available treatment options target the overall symptoms of IBS [Jailwala et al. 2000]. Moreover, due to unexpected side effects of recently developed IBS drugs [Pasricha, 2007; Thompson, 2001] several pharmaceutical companies have stopped their development of drugs for functional GI disorders. Moreover, nonpharmacological treatment alternatives such as different psychological treatment options [Lackner et al. 2004], which seem to be very effective, are hampered by limited availability. Therefore, there are great unmet medical needs for patients with functional GI disorders today.

Inflammation, permeability, bacteria and IBS

During recent years, studies exploring new pathogenetic and pathophysiological factors have been presented. These include low-grade inflammation within the GI tract [Ohman et al. 2005; Barbara et al. 2004], altered intestinal permeability [Piche et al. 2009] and alterations in the bacterial flora of the GI tract [Kassinen et al. 2007; Posserud et al. 2007]. In particular, the latter has attracted many researchers, which can be seen in the increasing number of publications found on PubMed exploring the role of bacteria in IBS in recent years (Figure 1). Future studies will most certainly be valuable in order to clarify the role of bacteria in IBS and the possibilities to do so are tremendous given the fact that new sophisticated techniques to analyze the composition of the gut flora more accurately have been developed [Furrie, 2006].

Figure 1.
Number of articles found on PubMed when using the search terms ‘bacteria’ and ‘IBS’.

Probiotics and IBS

Probiotics are defined by the World Health Organization as ‘live micro-organisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host’ [WHO]. Several groups have performed studies assessing the effect of different probiotic products on IBS symptoms, with somewhat conflicting results, but the overall impressionisthat probiotic products are promising treatment alternatives for functional GI disorders, which is supported by recent meta-analyses [McFarland and Dublin, 2008; Moayyedi et al. 2008]. However, today there is limited knowledge about mechanisms behind improvement with probiotics and if some probiotic products are better than the others. Therefore, more research within this area is needed, even though the number of articles published assessing probiotics in IBS is steadily increasing (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Number of articles found on PubMed when using the search terms ‘probiotic’ and ‘IBS’.

Conclusion

There are tremendous unmet medical needs in IBS and other functional GI disorders. The available treatment options are limited and the pathogenesis/pathophysiology is poorly understood. Better understanding of mechanisms behind symptoms in IBS is needed, as well as new effective treatment alternatives. Today, there is evidence that bacteria within the gut will turn out to be major players in the pathogenesis/pathophysiology of IBS and other functional GI disorders, and probiotics are certainly promising treatment alternatives for these patients. This will be thoroughly evaluated in the papers in this supplement, which are summaries of presentations given at a satellite symposium at the 2nd Joint International Neurogastroenterology and Motility meeting in Lucerne, Switzerland, November 2008.

Conflict of interest statement

Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Albireo, Danone, Movetis, Succampo, Addex, Research support: AstraZeneca, Danone, ArlaFoods, Alimenta, Novartis, Speaker: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Danone.

References

  • Agreus L., Svärdsudd K., Nyren O., Tibblin G. (1995) Irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia in the general population: overlap and lack of stability over time. Gastroenterology 109:671–680 [PubMed]
  • Barbara G., Stanghellini V., De Giorgio R., Cremon C., Cottrell G.S., Santini D. et al. (2004) Activated mast cells in proximity to colonic nerves correlate with abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 126:693–702 [PubMed]
  • Camilleri M., McKinzie S., Busciglio I., Low P.A., Sweetser S., Burton D. et al. (2008) Prospective study of motor, sensory, psychologic, and autonomic functions in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:772–781 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chey W.Y., Jin H.O., Lee M.H., Sun S.W., Lee K.Y. (2001) Colonic motility abnormality in patients with irritable bowel syndrome exhibiting abdominal pain and diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1499–1506 [PubMed]
  • Corsetti M., Caenepeel P., Fischler B., Janssens J., Tack J. (2004) Impact of coexisting irritable bowel syndrome on symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1152–1159 [PubMed]
  • Drossman D.A. (2006) The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology 130:1377–1390 [PubMed]
  • Drossman D.A., Whitehead W.E., Toner B.B., Diamant N., Hu Y.J., Bangdiwala S.I. et al. (2000) What determines severity among patients with painful functional bowel disorders? Am J Gastroenterol 95:974–980 [PubMed]
  • FAO/WHO (2001) Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria
  • Ford M.J., Miller P.M., Eastwood J., Eastwood M.A. (1987) Life events, psychiatric illness and the irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 28:160–165 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Furrie E. (2006) A molecular revolution in the study of intestinal microflora. Gut 55:141–143 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gwee K.A., Leong Y.L., Graham C, Mckendrick M.W., Collins S.M., Walters S.J. et al. (1999) The role of psychological and biological factors in postinfective gut dysfunction. Gut 44:400–406 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Halvorson H.A., Schlett CD., Riddle M.S. (2006) Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome - a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1894–1899, quiz 1942 [PubMed]
  • Harvey R.F., Salih S.Y, Read A.E. (1983) Organic and functional disorders in 2000 gastroenterology outpatients. Lancet 1:632–634 [PubMed]
  • Hobson A.R., Aziz Q. (2004) Brain imaging and functional gastrointestinal disorders: has it helped our understanding? Gut 53:1198–1206 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jailwala J., Imperiale T.F., Kroenke K. (2000) Pharmacologic treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 133:136–147 [PubMed]
  • Kanazawa M., Palsson O.S., Thiwan S.I., Turner M.J., Van Tilburg M.A., Gangarosa L.M. et al. (2008) Contributions of pain sensitivity and colonic motility to IBS symptom severity and predominant bowel habits. Am J Gastroenterol 103:2550–2561 [PubMed]
  • Kassinen A., Krogius-Kurikka L., Makivuokko H., Rinttila T., Paulin L., Corander J. et al. (2007) The fecal microbiota of irritable bowel syndrome patients differs significantly from that of healthy subjects. Gastroenterology 133:24–33 [PubMed]
  • Lackner J.M., Mesmer C, Morley S., Dowzer C., Hamilton S. (2004) Psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 72:1100–1113 [PubMed]
  • Levy R.L., Jones K.R., Whitehead W.E., Feld S.I., Talley N.J., Corey L.A. (2001) Irritable bowel syndrome in twins: heredity and social learning both contribute to etiology. Gastroenterology 121:799–804 [PubMed]
  • Levy R.L., Whitehead W.E., Von Korff M.R., Feld A.D. (2000) Intergenerational transmission of gastrointestinal illness behavior. Am J Gastroenterol 95:451–456 [PubMed]
  • Longstreth G.F., Thompson W.G., Chey W.D., Houghton L.A., Mearin F., Spiller R.C. (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1480–1491 [PubMed]
  • Maxton D.G., Morris J., Whorwell P.J. (1991) More accurate diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome by the use of ‘non- colonic' symptomatology. Gut 32:784–786 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McFarland L.V., Dublin S. (2008) Meta-analysis of probiotics for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 14:2650–2661 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mertz H., Naliboff B., Munakata J., Niazi N., Mayer E.A. (1995) Altered rectal perception is a biological marker of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 109:40–52 [PubMed]
  • Moayyedi P., Ford A.C., Talley N.J., Cremonini F., Foxx-Orenstein A., Brandt L. et al. (2008) The efficacy of probiotics in the therapy of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review. Gut: [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed]
  • Naliboff B.D., Berman S., Suyenobu B., Labus J.S., Chang L., Stains J. et al. (2006) Longitudinal change in perceptual and brain activation response to visceral stimuli in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Gastroenterology 131:352–365 [PubMed]
  • Ohman L., Isaksson S., Lundgren A., Simrén M., Sjövall H. (2005) A controlled study of colonic immune activity and beta7+ blood T lymphocytes in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:980–986 [PubMed]
  • Ohman L., Simrén M. (2007) New insights into the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Liver Dis 39:201–215 [PubMed]
  • Pasricha P.J. (2007) Desperately seeking serotonin. A commentary on the withdrawal of tegaserod and the state of drug development for functional and motility disorders. Gastroenterology 132:2287–2290 [PubMed]
  • Piche T., Barbara G., Aubert P., Bruley Des Varannes S., Dainese R., Nano J.L. et al. (2009) Impaired intestinal barrier integrity in the colon of patients with irritable bowel syndrome: involvement of soluble mediators. Gut 58:196–201 [PubMed]
  • Posserud I., Ersryd A., Simren M. (2006) Functional findings in irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 12:2830–2838 [PubMed]
  • Posserud I., Stotzer P.O., Bjornsson E.S., Abrahamsson H., Simren M. (2007) Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 56:802–808 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Posserud I., Syrous A., Lindstrom L., Tack J., Abrahamsson H., Simren M. (2007) Altered rectal perception in irritable bowel syndrome is associated with symptom severity. Gastroenterology 133:1113–1123 [PubMed]
  • Saito Y.A., Zimmerman J.M., Harmsen W.S., De Andrade M., Locke G.R., 3rd, Petersen G.M. et al. (2008) Irritable bowel syndrome aggregates strongly in families: a family-based case-control study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 20:790–797 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Simrén M., Brazier J., Coremans G., Dapoigny M., Muller-Lissner S.A., Pace F. et al. (2004) Quality of life and illness costs in irritable bowel syndrome. Digestion 69:254–261 [PubMed]
  • Simrén M., Castedal M., Svedlund J., Abrahamsson H., Bjornsson E. (2000) Abnormal propagation pattern of duodenal pressure waves in the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Dig Dis Sci 45:2151–2161 [PubMed]
  • Simrén M., Svedlund J., Posserud I., Bjornsson E.S., Abrahamsson H. (2006) Health-related quality of life in patients attending a gastroenterology outpatient clinic: functional disorders versus organic diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:187–195 [PubMed]
  • Spiller R., Aziz Q., Creed F., Emmanuel A., Houghton L., Hungin P. et al. (2007) Guidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and practical management. Gut 56:1770–1798 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Thompson C.A. (2001) Alosetron withdrawn from market. Am J Health Syst Pharm 58:13. [PubMed]
  • Thompson W.G., Heaton K.W., Smyth G.T, Smyth C. (2000) Irritable bowel syndrome in general practice: prevalence characteristics, and referral. Gut 46:78–82 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vandvik P.O., Lydersen S., Farup P.G. (2006) Prevalence, comorbidity and impact of irritable bowel syndrome in Norway. Scand J Gastroenterol 41:650–656 [PubMed]
  • Wells N.E., Hahn B.A., Whorwell P.J. (1997) Clinical economics review: irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 11:1019–1030 [PubMed]
  • Whitehead W.E., Crowell M.D., Robinson J.C., Heller B.R., Schuster M.M. (1992) Effects of stressful life events on bowel symptoms: subjects with irritable bowel syndrome compared with subjects without bowel dysfunction. Gut 33:825–830 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications