PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Anxiety Disord. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan 1, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3001130
NIHMSID: NIHMS147310
Predictors of social anxiety in an opioid dependent sample and a control sample
Fiona L. Shand, M. Clin. Psych.,a Louisa Degenhardt, Ph.D.,a Elliot C. Nelson, M.D.,b and Richard P. Mattick, Ph.D.a
aNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, AUSTRALIA
bWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 40 N. Kings Highway, Suite 1, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
Corresponding author: Fiona Shand. fionas/at/unsw.edu.au
Compared to other mental health problems, social anxiety is under-acknowledged amongst opioid dependent populations. This study aimed to assess levels of social anxiety and identify its predictors in an opioid dependent sample and a matched control group. Opioid dependent participants (n = 1385) and controls (n = 417) completed the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS), the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and a diagnostic interview. Regression analyses were used to test a range of predictors of social anxiety. Opioid dependent cases had higher mean scores on both scales compared to controls. Predictors of social anxiety centred on emotional rejection in childhood, either by parents or peers. For opioid dependent cases, but not controls, lifetime non-opioid substance dependence (cannabis, sedatives, and tobacco) was associated with higher levels of social anxiety. However, much of the variance in social anxiety remains unexplained for this population.
Keywords: Social anxiety, social phobia, opioid dependence, substance use disorder, comorbidity
An estimated 2.7 per cent of the general population in Australia meet criteria for social phobia (12 month prevalence), with higher proportions among women than men (Andrews, Hall, Teesson, & Henderson, 1999). It is a persistent and disabling disorder that impairs functioning across several domains (Schneier et al., 1994). Social anxiety, although not synonymous with social phobia, constitutes an important aspect of social phobia, although individuals with social anxiety may not exhibit the behavioral avoidance or distress necessary for a diagnosis of social phobia (Rapee & Spence, 2004).
Opioid dependence occurs rarely at approximately 6.9 per 1000 in the Australian population (Hall, Ross, Lynskey, Law, & Degenhardt, 2000), but it is associated with high levels of mental health problems, unemployment, crime, and poor physical health (Hall, Lynskey & Degenhardt, 1999; Henderson, Ross, Darke, Teesson, & Lynskey, 2002; Hser, Hoffman, Grella, & Anglin, 2001). Dependent opioid users tend to cycle through periods of use, treatment and abstinence (Darke, Degenhardt, & Mattick, 2006). The long term outcomes are typically poor (Hser et al., 2001). The combination of two such disabling problems is therefore likely to have a negative impact across a range of domains.
Research examining social anxiety amongst heroin users is sparse, but there is a known high rate of comorbidity between anxiety and substance use disorders. In Australia, 46 per cent of women and 25 per cent of men with a substance use disorder also met criteria for an anxiety or affective disorder (Andrews et al., 1999; 12 month prevalence). Of those people with a diagnosis of social phobia, 8.7 per cent met criteria for a drug use disorder (Andrews et al., 1999). This compares with rates of drug use disorders in the general population of 2.2 per cent (Teesson, Hall, Lynskey, & Degenhardt, 2000). Two earlier studies indicate that social anxiety is common amongst opioid users. Rates amongst clinical samples have ranged from one-quarter for significant social anxiety (Grenyer, Williams, Swift, & Neill, 1992) to 20 per cent for generalised social phobia and 42.6 per cent for non-generalised social phobia amongst 150 substance dependent patients (Zimmerman, Pinn et al., 2004).
These rates of comorbidity raise the question of shared risk factors. One longitudinal study found that although young people with anxiety disorders are at increased risk of substance dependence, this association is largely non-causal and reflects common risk factors such as child abuse, exposure to family adversity, and parental psychopathology, and also to prior substance dependence, comorbid depression, and peer affiliations (Goodwin, Fergusson, & Horwood, 2004). Risk factors for drug dependence include social and cultural factors such as drug availability, laws, cultural norms and economic factors (Hawkins, Catalano & Miller, 1994); childhood sexual and physical abuse (Afifi, Brownridge, Cox, & Sareen, 2006; Bulik, Prescott & Kendler, 2001; Fergusson, Horwood, & Lynskey, 1996; Kilpatrick, Acierno et al., 2000); early conduct disorder (Fergusson, Horwood, & Ridder, 2005); parental drug and alcohol use (Gorsuch & Butler, 1976; Lynskey, Fergusson, & Horwood, 1994, Kilpatrick, Acierno, et al., 2000); parental attitudes to drug use (Hawkins et al., 1994); affiliation with drug using peers (Goodwin et al., 2004; Hawkins et al., 1994); peer rejection in early grades, poor and inconsistent parenting practices during childhood, exposure to family conflict, and low bonding to family (Hawkins et al., 1994); inter-parental violence in childhood (Fergusson & Horwood, 1998); academic failure (Hawkins et al., 1994; Newcomb, Maddahian, & Bentler, 1986); and sensation seeking and risk taking (Hawkins et al., 1994; Miles, van den Bree et al., 2001).
There may be a shared genetic component between social phobia and substance dependence: Nelson, Grant et al. (2001) found that a common additive genetic component influenced social phobia, depression, and alcohol dependence. Additionally, substance dependence and social phobia both have a heritable component (Tsuang, Lyons et al., 1996; Kendler & Prescott, 1998; Miles, van den Bree et al., 2001; True & Xian, 1999; VandenBree, Johnson, Neale, & Pickens, 1998). One model of the etiology of social phobia suggests that social phobia has its origins in broad genetic factors which predispose an individual to a given level of social anxiety (Rapee & Spence, 2004). This level acts as the individual’s ‘set point’ which is moderately stable and consistent, but which can be moved by powerful environmental influences.
The environmental risk factors for social phobia include lack of a close relationship with an adult (Chartier, Walker, & Stein, 2001). However, DeWit, Chandler-Coutts et al. (2005) found that this was a risk factor for males but not females. Other risk factors include childhood sexual abuse and marital conflict in the family of origin (Chartier et al., 2001; DeWit, Chandler-Coutts et al., 2005); parental history of mental disorder, moving more than three times as a child, juvenile justice and child welfare involvement, running away from home, and poor school performance (Chartier et al., 2001); parental alcohol problems (De Wit et al., 2005); lower educational attainment (de Graaf, Bilj, Smit, Vollebergh, & Spijker, 2002); traumatic conditioning (Stemberger, Turner, Beidel, & Calhoun, 1995); childhood shyness and early behavioral inhibition (Rapee & Spence, 2004; Stemberger et al., 1995); parental over-control, parental coldness, parental hostility, and restricted social exposure (Rapee & Spence, 2004; Taylor & Alden, 2005), and peer rejection/early aversive social experiences (Gazelle & Ladd, 2003). Those with specific social phobia but not generalized social phobia are more likely to have had a traumatic social conditioning event than normal controls (Stemberger et al., 1995). Socially phobic patients describe their parents as less affectionate and more rejecting compared to controls (Taylor & Alden, 2005). Although physical abuse has been indentified as a risk factor for social phobia (Chartier et al., 2001), physical punishment is not a risk factor for anxiety disorders generally (Afifi et al., 2006).
This paper aims to identify prevalence and correlates of social anxiety amongst opioid dependence cases and non-dependent controls. We predicted we would find high levels of social anxiety amongst the opioid dependent case sample because of shared risk factors between the two disorders. And, given that we have attempted to match the non-dependent controls to cases on socioeconomic status, and social disadvantage is a risk factor for anxiety disorders, we also expected to find elevated scores amongst the control group compared to general community samples. Based on current literature, we expected the following factors to predict social anxiety for both cases and controls: lack of a close relationship with an adult, violence between parents; parental separation; parental history of substance use disorder, juvenile justice involvement, running away from home, childhood abuse and neglect, and being victim of bullying during childhood.
2.1 Procedure
This study utilized data collected for the Comorbidity and Trauma Study (CATS), a large retrospective case-control study examining the influence of genetics and childhood trauma on opioid dependence. The study was funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse, and was run in collaboration with Washington University, the Queensland Institute of Medical Research, and the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), University of New South Wales. The aim of the main project was to identify the interaction of genetic vulnerability and childhood trauma in the development of opioid dependence and its associated comorbid mental disorders. It is a case-control design with 1500 opioid dependent participants and 500 non-dependent, age, sex, and socio-economic status (SES) matched controls. At the time of writing, the project had completed research with 1802 participants. Data collection was carried out in the greater Sydney area by NDARC.
2.2 Participant recruitment
Opioid dependent participants (n = 1385) in this study were recruited through public and private methadone clinics. Non-dependent control participants (n = 417) were recruited through street press, employment services, and letter-box drops and/or flyer hand outs in areas close to participating methadone clinics.
Cases were eligible if they were aged 18 years or over; had an adequate understanding of English (in order to provide informed consent and participate in a long interview); and had participated in pharmacotherapy maintenance treatment for opioid dependence. Controls were eligible if they were aged 18 years or over; had an adequate understanding of English (in order to provide informed consent and participate in a long interview); and had used opioids illicitly less than 5 times over their lifetime. Recruitment was targeted at matching cases and controls on age, sex, and employment status. The matching criteria and the recruitment of the groups from the same geographical areas were techniques employed as proxy measures for ethnicity and social disadvantage.
All participants were guaranteed any information given to the researchers would be kept strictly confidential. Ethics approvals were obtained from the institutional review boards of University of New South Wales, Washington University, Queensland Institute of Medical Research and, for cases, the relevant area heath service. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All participants were reimbursed $50 for out-of-pocket expenses.
2.3 Structured Interview
Each participant completed a 1.5 to 2.5 hour structured interview containing sections on demographics, family history, alcohol and substance use and dependence, psychiatric diagnoses, and childhood and adult trauma. The diagnostic sections of the interview were based on the Semi-Structured Assessment of the Genetics of Alcoholism - Australia (SSAGA-OZ) and allow for DSM-IV and/or DSM-III-R diagnoses to be made for opioid abuse and dependence, alcohol, cannabis, sedative, stimulants, and cocaine abuse and dependence, nicotine dependence, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression (major depressive episode), panic disorder and antisocial personality (Bucholz et al., 1994; Hesselbrock et al., 1999). Sections of the Christchurch Health and Development Study interview were modified to assess for childhood trauma and adult victimization history (Fergusson, Horwood, Shannon, & Lawton, 1989). Childhood trauma included ten items about non-contact, contact and penetrative sexual abuse. Physical abuse included thirteen items asking about physical assault by a caregiver or injury arising from a caregiver’s actions towards the participant. Emotional abuse was measured with a single item assessing verbal insult from a caregiver. Neglect included five items regarding inadequate provision of physical care, inadequate supervision, and lack of support or emotional regard from a caregiver. Several other risk factors were also examined: experiencing bullying during childhood or adolescence, early parental separation (before the age of five), problematic substance use by a parent, physical conflict between parents, close maternal and close paternal relationships, having a support person while growing up, running away from home, and juvenile justice involvement. Interviewers had graduate and postgraduate qualifications in psychology or social sciences and had received comprehensive training in the administration of the structured diagnostic interview used in the study.
Participants completed two measures of social anxiety: the Social Anxiety Interaction Scale (SIAS), which corresponds to Generalised Social Phobia in DSM-III-R (Mattick & Clarke, 1998), and the Social Phobia Scale (SPS), which corresponds to the criteria for Circumscribed Social Phobia in DSM-III-R (Mattick & Clarke, 1998). The SIAS measures fear of social interaction. It consists of 20 items rated from 0 (not at all characteristic or true of me) to 4 (extremely true or characteristic of me). It is scored by summing the ratings (after reversing the three positively worded items) and has a total score ranging from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. The SPS assesses fear of being scrutinized during routine activities such as eating, drinking, and writing. It consists of 20 items and is rated on the same 5 point scale as the SIAS. It is also scored in the same way as the SIAS. Scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. The mean community scores on the SIAS and SPS were 18.8 and 14.4 respectively (Mattick & Clarke, 1998). The SIAS and the SPS were also validated amongst a US sample of socially phobic patients (Brown et al., 1997).
2.4 Statistical analysis
T-tests were used to test for differences in age and SIAS and SPS scores, with the mean and standard deviation reported (SD). Where indicated by cross-tabulations, chi square tests (χ2) were conducted to determine whether an association existed between categorical variables. Because of the large sample size and the number of analyses conducted, a conservative significance level (0.01) was adopted to minimise Type I errors. In the case of odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals have been reported in keeping with standard practice, but only those with a significance level of less than or equal to 0.01 have been reported here.
Linear regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with social anxiety. Separate regressions were used for cases and controls. The total score for each participant was used as the dependent variable. Independent variables were initially selected if they had been identified by previous studies as a risk factor for social phobia. Variables for the linear regression models were then selected by running univariate analysis for each variable under consideration for the model. Variables with a p-value less than 0.25 were included in the multivariate model, along with variables identified in the literature as clinically important (Hosmer & Lemeshow, 2000). Gender, age, education, employment status, and substance dependencies (alcohol, nicotine, sedatives, cannabis, stimulants, and cocaine) were entered into the model to control for differences between cases and controls. All independent variables were entered at the same time. Some factors (juvenile justice involvement, early separation from parents, running away from home) were excluded from the linear regression analysis as univariate analysis indicated that they were not associated with increased social anxiety scores. All analyses were carried out using SPSS for Windows, version 15.0.
3.1 Sample characteristics
Cases were more likely to be male (60.7% vs. 46.5%, OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.43–2.22), to have less years of education (53.1% vs. 18.8%, OR 4.89, 95% CI 3.74–6.39), and to be unemployed (83.9 % vs. 56.9%, OR 3.94, 95% CI 3.10–5.02) than controls (Table 1). There was no difference in age, with cases having a mean age of 36.4 years compared to a mean age of 35.3 years for controls. Both groups had high levels of substance use, with cases having higher levels of lifetime dependence across all substance categories (Table 2).
Table 1
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of cases and controls
Table 2
Table 2
Lifetime rates of substance dependence for cases and controls
3.2 Social anxiety scores
Cases had higher mean scores than controls on both the SIAS (25.7 (SD = 14.5) vs. 23.1(SD 12.7), t=−3.311785, p <0.001) and the SPS (20.1 (SD = 17.0) vs. 16.7 (SD = 15.1), t=−3.691785, p <0.001). On the SIAS, 64% of cases and 59.5% of controls scored above the mean community score, while only 51.6% of cases and 40.8% of controls scored above the mean community score on the SPS.
3.3 Potential risk factors for social anxiety
For cases, bullying, emotional abuse, sedative dependence, and tobacco dependence were the variables most consistently associated with social anxiety scores (Table 3). Alcohol, stimulant, and cocaine dependence were not associated with either measure of social anxiety. Social interaction anxiety was associated with having been bullied, having experienced childhood emotional abuse, and sedative, cannabis, and tobacco dependence. Witnessing parental violence was negatively correlated with SIAS scores. Social performance anxiety was associated with having less than 10 years of education, bullying, childhood emotional abuse, and sedative and tobacco dependence (Table 3).
Table 3
Table 3
Risk factors for cases and controls on Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and Social Phobia Scale
For controls, social interaction anxiety and social performance anxiety were both associated with bullying, childhood emotional abuse and sexual abuse (Table 3). Overall, the model explained little of the total variance in social anxiety scores for cases (10.3% for the SIAS and 8.5% for the SPS) compared to controls (24.1% for the SIAS and 17.9% for the SPS).
Both cases and controls appear to have higher mean social anxiety scores than those found in an Australian community sample (Mattick & Clarke, 1998). On the SIAS, more than half of the cases and controls scored above the community mean.
Significant proportions of both cases and controls had experienced lifetime non-opioid substance dependence. This finding is not unexpected for the case group since polydrug use is common amongst opioid users (Ross et al., 2005). However, rates of substance dependence for the control group are higher than those found in the general community. For instance, 26 per cent had experienced alcohol dependence at some point in their life. No lifetime prevalence figures are available for the Australian population. However, the United States lifetime population prevalence for alcohol dependence is 5.4 per cent, with a 12 month prevalence of 1.3 per cent (Kessler et al., 2005). Australia’s 12 month population prevalence for alcohol dependence is 3.5 per cent (Teesson et al., 2000). Higher levels of substance dependence amongst controls may be because we attempted to match controls to cases on SES, using unemployment as a marker. There is evidence that a disadvantaged background is a risk factor for substance dependence (Goodwin et al., 2004).
Emotional abuse by parents and peers were risk factors for social anxiety amongst opioid dependent participants and matched controls. Some of the expected correlates of social anxiety were not significant (emotional neglect, physical abuse and neglect, and parental history of substance use disorder). In contrast, bullying and emotional abuse were consistently associated with both social interaction anxiety and social performance anxiety for both groups. Less education was associated with social performance anxiety for both groups. Predictors for social anxiety on both scales for controls were remarkably consistent: bullying, sexual abuse and emotional abuse. For cases, bullying, emotional abuse, and tobacco dependence were the most consistent predictors on both scales.
Some interesting case-control differences emerged. Substance dependence (cannabis, sedatives, and nicotine) was a risk factor only for cases, whereas sexual abuse was a risk factor only for controls. Unemployment was associated with social interaction anxiety only for cases. Witnessing parental violence was protective against social interaction anxiety for the case group. The reasons for this unusual outcome are unclear. We can only hypothesise that this sub-group who witnessed parental violence may have inherited antisocial tendencies from parents who have similarly high levels of antisocial tendencies and are thus more likely to engage in inter-partner violence. Externalizing disorders have a heritability estimate of 0.80 (Hicks et al., 2004). While internalizing and externalizing disorders are by no means mutually exclusive, these inherited antisocial characteristics may be somewhat protective against social anxiety, since antisocial personality disorder is characterized by a lack of concern for others, whereas social anxiety is characterized by over concern for what others think. In the National Comorbidity Study Replication, conduct disorder showed lower correlations with anxiety disorders than did the other impulse control disorders (Kessler, Chiu, Demler, & Walters, 2005).
While it was surprising that physical abuse was not associated with either measure of social anxiety, it may be that the impact of physical abuse is mediated by emotional abuse. It is also possible that there are gender differences in the impact of physical abuse on social anxiety. De Wit et al. (2005) found that physical abuse was a risk factor for females but not males. Predictors identified in each of the regression models presented a consistent theme. Factors linked to emotional rejection in childhood, either by parents or peers, were associated with social anxiety. This is consistent with previous findings regarding the development of social anxiety. Rejection and neglect by peers is strongly associated with increased social anxiety (Gazelle & Ladd, 2003; Neal & Edelmann, 2003). Further, increased social anxiety has been found to be more a consequence of frequent rejection experiences than overt aggression (Vernberg, Abwender, Ewell, & Beery, 1992). Anxious, solitary children who are excluded by their peers early in life also display greater stability of anxious solitude in later life (Gazelle & Ladd, 2003). Those who responded positively to questions of emotional abuse may have experienced parental rejection, criticism and coldness, which are all risk factors for social anxiety (Rapee & Spence, 2004; Taylor & Alden, 2005). Further, peer rejection may be more potent for those whose parents are perceived as more controlling, as the need for peer affiliation is more acute amongst this group as they enter adolescence (Fuligni & Eccles, 1993).
Some limitations of this study should be acknowledged. The possibility of early cognitive biases and errors on the part of the study’s participants cannot be ruled out. Social phobia often begins in childhood or early adolescence (Chavira & Stein, 2005) and this study relied on participants’ memories and perceptions of how they were treated by parents and peers. These perceptions, and participants’ interactions with their peers and families, may have been influenced by cognitive, attentional and memory biases experienced by social anxiety sufferers (Amir, Foa, & Coles, 1998; Amir, Foa, & Coles, 2000; Amir, Freshman, & Foa, 2002). However the perception of parent and peer interactions that participants recalled may be equally important as what might be noted externally by an independent observer (Neal & Edelmann, 2003). No research to date conclusively demonstrates that our participants’ recall of these experiences is likely to be factually incorrect. A further limitation of the study is that a high score on the SIAS or SPS does not constitute a diagnosis of social phobia as it doesn’t measure behavioral avoidance and functional impairment.
It seems reasonable to conclude that the major risk factors for social anxiety in this population are yet to be identified as the regression models explained only a small proportion of the variance in social anxiety scores for heroin dependent cases. It is feasible that the high levels of social anxiety amongst this sample are partially explained by a shared genetic risk. Previous research has identified that a common additive genetic component influences social phobia, depression, and alcohol dependence (Nelson et al., 2001). Similarly, many of the environmental risk factors identified for social anxiety and opioid dependence are also risk factors for other mental disorders, so the likelihood is that these two disorders are part of a much more complex pattern of disorders (Rapee & Spence, 2004).
5. Conclusion
This is the first large-scale Australian study to examine social anxiety among an opioid dependent sample. It indicates that childhood adversity in the form of peer and parental rejection is a risk factor for social anxiety for both opioid dependent individuals and controls matched for age, sex, and SES. Given the levels of substance use problems amongst both groups and the disabling effects of substance use disorders and social phobia, it is important to acknowledge the added impact that these levels of social anxiety may have on their lives and treatment outcomes.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse. The authors wish to thank the other co-investigators, the research team (Elizabeth Maloney, Elizabeth Conroy, Michelle Torok, Caitlin McCue, Cherie Kam, and Greg French), and the participants who gave their time and information. The authors also thank Elizabeth Conroy for her comments on drafts of the paper.
Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
  • Afifi TO, Brownridge DA, Cox BJ, Sareen J. Physical punishment, childhood abuse and psychiatric disorders. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2006;30:1093–1103. [PubMed]
  • Amin N, Foa EB, Coles ME. Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behavior Research & Therapy. 1998;36:945–957. [PubMed]
  • Amir N, Foa EB, Coles ME. Implicit memory bias for threat-relevant information in individuals with generalized social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2000;109:713–720. [PubMed]
  • Amir N, Freshman M, Foa E. Enhanced Stroop interference for threat in social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2002;16:1–9. [PubMed]
  • Andrews G, Hall W, Teesson M, Henderson AS. The Mental Health of Australians. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care; 1999.
  • Brown EJ, Turovsky J, Heimberg RG, Juster HR, Brown TA, Barlow DH. Validation of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale across the anxiety disorders. Psychological Assessment. 1997;9:21–27.
  • Bucholz K, Cadoret R, Cloninger C, Dinwiddie S, Hesselbrock VM, Nurnberger JI, Reich T, Schmidt I, Schuckit M. A new, semi-structured interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1994;55:149–158. [PubMed]
  • Bulik CM, Prescott CA, Kendler KS. Features of childhood sexual abuse and the development of psychiatric and substance use disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2001;179:444–449. [PubMed]
  • Chartier MJ, Walker JR, Stein MB. Social phobia and potential childhood risk factors in a community sample. Psychological Medicine. 2001;31:307–315. [PubMed]
  • Chavira DA, Stein MB. Childhood social anxiety disorder: from understanding to treatment. Child and Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2005;14:797–818. [PubMed]
  • de Graaf R, Bijl RV, Smit FM, Vollebergh WAM, Spijker J. Risk factors for 12-month comorbidity of mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders: Findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;159:620–629. [PubMed]
  • Darke S, Degenhardt L, Mattick R. Mortality amongst illicit drug users: Epidemiology, causes and intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
  • DeWit DJ, Chandler-Coutts M, Offord DR, King G, McDougall J, Specht J, Stewart S. Gender differences in the effects of family adversity on the risk of onset of DSM-III-R social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2005;19:479–502. [PubMed]
  • Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Exposure to interparental violence in childhood and psychosocial adjustment in young adulthood. Child Abuse & Neglect. 1998;22:339–357. [PubMed]
  • Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Lynskey MT. Childhood sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood: II. Psychiatric outcomes of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1996;35:1365–1374. [PubMed]
  • Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM. Show me the child at seven: The consequences of conduct problems in childhood for psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology. 2005;46:837–849. [PubMed]
  • Fergusson D, Horwood L, Shannon F, Lawton J. The Christchurch Child Development Study: A review of epidemiological findings. Paedatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 1989;3:302–325. [PubMed]
  • Fuligni AJ, Eccles JS. Perceived parent-child relationships and early adolescents' orientation toward peers. Developmental Psychology. 1993;29:622–632.
  • Gazelle H, Ladd GW. Anxious solitude and peer exclusion: A diathesis-stress model of internalizing trajectories in childhood. Child Development. 2003;74:257–278. [PubMed]
  • Goodwin RD, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Association between anxiety disorders and substance use disorders among young persons: Results of a 21-year longitudinal study. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2004;38:295–304. [PubMed]
  • Gorsuch RL, Butler MC. Initial drug abuse: A review of predisposing social psychological factors. Psychological Bulletin. 1976;83:120–137. [PubMed]
  • Grenyer BFS, Williams GW, Swift W, Neill O. The prevalence of socialevaluative anxiety in opioid users seeking treatment. The International Journal of the Addictions. 1992;27:665–673. [PubMed]
  • Hall W, Ross JE, Lynskey MT, Law MG, Degenardt LJ. How many dependent heroin users are there in Australia? Medical Journal of Australia. 2000;173:528–531. [PubMed]
  • Hall W, Lynskey MT, Degenhardt L. Heroin use in Australia: Its impact on public health and public order. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre; 1999. Monograph No. 42.
  • Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin. 1994;112:64–105. [PubMed]
  • Henderson N, Ross J, Darke S, Teesson M, Lynskey M. Longitudinal studies of dependent heroin users in Australia: Feasibility and benefits. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre; 2002. Monograph no. 49.
  • Hesselbrock M, Easton C, Bucholz K, Schuckit M, Hesselbrock V. A validity study of the SSAGA - a comparison with the SCAN. Addiction. 1999;94:1361–1370. [PubMed]
  • Hicks BM, Krueger RF, Iacono WG, McGue M, Patrick CJ. Family transmission and heritability of externalizing disorders: a twin-family study. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2004;61:922–928. [PubMed]
  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
  • Hser Y, Hoffman V, Grella C, Anglin MD. A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2001;58:503–508. [PubMed]
  • Lynskey MT, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. The effect of parental alcohol problems on rates of adolescent psychiatric disorders. Addiction. 1994;89:1277–1286. [PubMed]
  • Kendler KS, Prescott C. Cannabis use, abuse and dependence in a populationbased sample of twins. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1998;155:1016–1022. [PubMed]
  • Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005;62:593–602. [PubMed]
  • Kessler RC, Chui WT, Demler O, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005;62:617–627. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kilpatrick DG, Acierno R, Saunders B, Resnick HS, Best CL, Schnurr PP. Risk factors for adolescent substance abuse and dependence: Data from a national sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2000;63:19–30. [PubMed]
  • Mattick RP, Clarke JC. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1998;36:455–470. [PubMed]
  • Miles DR, van den Bree MBM, Gupman AE, Newlin DB, Glantz MD, Pickens RW. A twin study on sensation seeking, risk taking behavior and marijuana use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2001;62:57–58. [PubMed]
  • Neal JA, Edelmann RJ. The etiology of social phobia: Toward a developmental profile. Clinical Psychology Review. 2003;23:761–786. [PubMed]
  • Nelson EC, Grant JD, Bucholz KK, Glowinski A, Madden PAF, Reich W, Heath AC. Social phobia in a population-based female adolescent twin sample: Comorbidity and associated suicide-related symptoms. Psychological Medicine. 2000;30:797–804. [PubMed]
  • Newcomb MD, Maddahian E, Bentler PM. Risk factors for drug use among adolescents: Concurrent and longitudinal analyses. American Journal of Public Health. 1986;76:525–531. [PubMed]
  • Rapee RM, Spence SH. The etiology of social phobia: Empirical evidence and an initial model. Clinical Psychology Review. 2004;24:737–767. [PubMed]
  • Ross J, Teeson M, Darke S, Lynskey M, Ali R, Ritter A, Cooke R. The characteristics of heroin users entering treatment: findings from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2005;24:411–418. [PubMed]
  • Schneier FR, Heckelman LR, Garfinkel R, Campeas R, Fallon BA, Gitow A, Street L, Del Bene D, Liebowitz MR. Functional impairment in social phobia. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1994;55:322–331. [PubMed]
  • Stemberger RT, Turner SM, Beidel DC, Calhoun KS. Social phobia: An analysis of possible developmental factors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1995;3:526–531. [PubMed]
  • Taylor CT, Alden LE. Social interpretation bias and generalized social phobia: The influences of developmental experiences. Behaviour Research & Therapy. 2005;43:959–777. [PubMed]
  • Teesson M, Hall W, Lynskey M, Degenhardt L. Alcohol-and drug-use disorders in Australia: Implications of the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;34:206–213. [PubMed]
  • True WR, Xian H. Common genetic vulnerability for nicotine and alcohol dependence in men. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1999;56:655–661. [PubMed]
  • Tsuang MT, Lyons MJ, Eisen SA, Golderg J, True W, Lin N, Toomey T, Eaves L. Co-occurrence of abuse of different drugs in men. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1996;55:967–972. [PubMed]
  • VandenBree M, Johnson E, Neale M, Pickens R. Genetic and environmental influences on drug use and abuse/dependence in male and female twins. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1998;52:231–241. [PubMed]
  • Vernberg EM, Abwender DA, Ewell KK, Beery SH. Social anxiety and peer relationships in early adolescence: A prospective analysis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1992;21:189–196.
  • Wells JE, Bushnell JA, Hornblow AR, Joyce PR, Oakley-Browne MA. Christchurch Psychiatric Epidemiology Study, Part I: Methodology and lifetime prevalence for specific psychiatric disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 1989;23:315–326. [PubMed]
  • Zimmerman G, Pin MA, Krenz S, Bouchat A, Favrat B, Besson J, Zullino DF. Prevalence of social phobia in a clinical sample of drug dependent patients. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2004;83:83–87. [PubMed]