|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Correspondence to: Dr. Youlia M Kirova, Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie 26, Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. email@example.com
Telephone: +33-1-44324637 Fax: +33-1-44324616
Radiation therapy has a major role in the management of breast cancers. However, there is no consensus on how to irradiate and on volume definitions, and there are strong differences in strategies according to different centers and physicians. New treatment protocols and techniques have been used with the principal purpose of decreasing lung and heart toxicity and adapting radiation treatment to patients’ anatomy. There is evidence that indicates internal mammary chain radiotherapy should be used carefully and that high quality techniques should be used for decreasing the dose delivered to the heart. This review of the literature presents the state of the art on breast cancer radiotherapy, with special focus on the indications, techniques, and potential toxicity.
Adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast plays a significant role in preventing local failure in women with tumorectomy for early stage breast cancer, as well as postmastectomy chest wall irradiation. Following surgery for early breast cancer, breast irradiation decreases the rate of in-breast local recurrence significantly, which has been demonstrated by randomized trials. Results of a meta analysis showed that there were more cardio related deaths in the group of irradiated patients compared with non irradiated patients[2,3], however, in this period old techniques and treatment modalities were used. On the other hand, with new advances in tumor control and long term survival, breast cancer patients have enough time to develop long term complications[3,4]. In some cases, the principal cause of complications is the anti cancer treatment, in others, there is no direct relationship between heart disease and the use of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and/or targeted treatment. Cardiac toxicity represents a multifactorial process with extreme complexity and direct relationship with patients’ anatomy, habits, co morbidities, and risk factors. Also, received treatment, such as anthracycline-based chemotherapy or capecitabine, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, target treatments such as trastuzumab, can affect cardiac toxicity. Drug-related cardiac toxicity in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy has been well described for some drugs[4-6]. For others, such as targeted treatment with trastuzumab, studies are beginning[7-9]. The question is how to decrease radiation induced cardiac toxicity using modern techniques of radiotherapy and how we can elucidate predictive factors in some patients indicating they are at risk to develop this kind of toxicity.
Breast conserving radiotherapy uses tangential fields. Any other beam incidence would lead to useless irradiation of the underlying lung and heart. The possibilities and the limits of commonly used techniques for irradiation of breast with two tangential fields in supine position have been discussed in recent years[11-13]. The volume of irradiated lung, heart, and contralateral breast, must be considered. Treatment-related complications include cardiovascular morbidity that can translate into an increased risk of mortality in the long term and chronic radiation-induced pneumonitis. The early and late complications of radiation are directly related to the patient’s anatomy, total dose delivered, fractionation scheme, and radiation technique.
It can be difficult to understand and represent doses received by organs at risk (OAR) (Table (Table1).1). An example is given with the French recommendations, showing there is no clear explanation for which parts of the heart can withstand these doses, for example, coronary arteries or the muscle. Every type of treatment is associated with a different kind of toxicity, and more details are needed to report the doses received by different OAR. For example, concerning lung irradiation, there is a question whether suggested doses should be designated to patients with only breast irradiation or breast and lymph node area radiation.
According to some authors, large, pendulous breasts are, in some cases, a contraindication for breast conservation because cosmetic results have been unsatisfactory with increased fibrosis and retraction[12,13]. A number of institutions have reported the use of different techniques to improve the dose distribution within the breast, decrease acute toxicities, decrease the dose to normal tissues and improve the daily reproducibility of women with large breasts[14-21]. Two simple techniques have already been shown to be safe: breast irradiation in a prone position, which is a technique developed in MSCCC, New York, USA, and an isocentric lateral decubitus position founded in the Institute Curie, Paris, France[18-20]. These two techniques were created to prevent lung and heart irradiation. Example of left side breast cancer treated in a lateral decubitus position is given in Figure Figure1.1. This treatment is perfectly adapted for breast irradiation only in the elderly, in cases of patients with lung and/or heart co-morbidities, smokers, patients with pendulous breasts, patients treated with chemotherapy, and other specific cases. The limit is that these two techniques are created and adapted to only breast irradiation.
For teams without facilities for using the previously described techniques, new developments are also available. Wedges cannot compensate for the change in breast shape in the cranio-caudal direction. A field reduction is necessary at the breast fold to avoid overdosage and treatment complications in this area. Dose uniformity throughout the whole breast volume can be achieved by using MLC sub-fields that are shaped to the successive isodoses found in the dose distribution.
The definition of tumor bed “boost” volume is currently also well defined in numerous papers (Figure (Figure2).2). New techniques such as pre- and post-operative CT scan image registration are used.
The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy to the chest wall has been controversial for many years. Published data have shown that radiotherapy regimens produced moderate but definite reductions, not only in breast cancer mortality, but also in overall mortality[1,25-29]. The benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy, independently of the effects of systemic treatment, was shown also in studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the British Columbia study[25-31]. However, the first meta-analysis report did not find any advantage in overall survival over 10 and 20 years. One explanation is the increase of non-breast cancer deaths, particularly cardiac disease in relation to older irradiation techniques.
Two opposed tangential photon beams is a common technique for postmastectomy radiotherapy to the chest wall. Electron-beam radiotherapy of the chest wall is also used routinely[32-38]. It has been shown that this technique yielded similar loco-regional control, disease free survival and overall survival rates as standard photon beam irradiation. Postmastectomy electron beam chest wall irradiation is well tolerated with low rates of early toxicity events. New developments could continue to improve the previously existing techniques with better dose distribution and decrease of the doses to lung and heart. This is a clinical step towards conformal electron therapy[38,39].
The importance of adjuvant treatment of regional lymph nodes (LN) in N-positive patients, especially with more than 3 involved axillary LN, has already been shown. However, there is no consensus for the adjuvant treatment of internal mammary chain (IMC) and supra and infra clavicular LN, with strong differences in strategies according to centers and physicians. Indications for IMC radiotherapy are debated, since this treatment significantly increases the dose delivered to the heart and leads to potential technical difficulties. Although these data warrant confirmation by the EORTC prospective trial, there is evidence that the indications for IMC radiotherapy should be carefully considered and that high quality techniques should be used for decreasing the dose delivered to the heart. Previously published techniques using electron beams has already been shown to be safe.
Another revolution in radiotherapy over the last few years is the development of less toxic techniques of irradiation of LN after careful delineation and adaption to the patients’ anatomy[24,40-45] using high performing radiotherapy. Conformal radiotherapy requires definition of target volumes by anatomical limits based on delineation from CT images. Some authors have proposed anatomically based landmarks, specific for breast cancer radiotherapy, to delineate all regional LN[40-43]. Simplified rules of delineation have been developed in our department to delineate lymph node areas before conformal radiotherapy treatment, using easy to find anatomical structures (Table (Table22 and Figure Figure33).
Other adjuvant treatments for breast cancer have been shown to be cardiotoxic. The principal chemotherapy in treatment of breast cancer is still anthracycline-based chemotherapy and the toxicity of this chemotherapy is well known and documented[4-6]. The principal example comes from assessment of cardiac status in long-term survivors of pediatric malignancies who received chemotherapy, including anthracyclines. Steinherz et al have studied 201 patients who had received a total anthracycline dose of 200 mg/m2 to 1275 mg/m2 (median, 450 mg/m2), and 51 patients had mediastinal radiotherapy. The overall incidence and severity of abnormal systolic cardiac function were determined for the entire cohort. Risk factors of total anthracycline dose, mediastinal radiotherapy, age during treatment, and length of follow-up were examined. Twenty-three percent (47/201) of the cohort had abnormal cardiac function on noninvasive testing at long-term follow-up. Correlation between total cumulative dose, length of follow-up, and mediastinal irradiation with incidence of abnormalities was significant. Fifty-six patients were followed up for 10 years or more (median, 12 years), with a median anthracycline dose of 495 mg/m2. Thirty-eight percent (21/56) of these patients, compared with 18% (26/145) of patients evaluated after less than 10 years, had abnormal findings. Sixty-three percent of patients followed up for 10 years or more after receiving 500 mg/m2 or more of anthracyclines had abnormal findings. Nine of 201 patients had late symptoms, including cardiac failure and dysrhythmia, and three patients died suddenly. Microscopic examination of the myocardium on biopsy and autopsy revealed fibrosis. This study illustrates the importance of evaluation of all received treatments and not only one isolated treatment modality.
Other treatments, such as capecitabine, cyclophosphamide, trastuzumab, have also shown cardiac toxicity. Provided that the technique is adapted, the acute skin and heart toxicities of the concomitant administration of trastuzumab-RT appeared satisfactory.
Currently, patients at high risk for cardiac toxicity from usual chemotherapy are evaluated by an anesthesiologist before their surgical procedure and are also evaluated by their oncologist with test results from ejection fraction, electrocardiogram and anamnesis of history of cardiac disease.
There is a trend towards cardiac toxicity in patients with a past history of low ejection fraction, although seemingly poor cardiac risk patients may fare well with high doses of chemotherapy if carefully selected with the aid of a thorough cardiac evaluation with electrocardiogram and cardiac ultrasound. Currently, in our department, in the case of concomitant systemic treatment and radiotherapy, left ventricular ejection fractions, assessed at baseline, before start of RT, after completion of RT and then every 4-6 mo with either echocardiography or multiple gated acquisition scanning, were considered normal if ≥ 50% or stated so by the cardiologist.
At the same time, other risk factors, such as obesity, known cardiac and vascular dysfunction and smoking history must be evaluated.
Improvements in breast cancer radiotherapy in the last few years have been spectacular. This fact probably will result in decreasing the side effects of radiation treatment and will improve the quality of life of treated patients with lower rates of side effects. At the same time, the evaluation of long term side effects of new systemic treatments, such as chemotherapy, new targeted drugs, and hormonal treatments, is needed.
To all on the team of breast cancer radiotherapy (Fourquet A, Fournier-Bidoz N, Campana F, Bollet M, Dendale R, Castro Pena P, Peurien D, Lelievre H, Stilhart A, Brunet Y).
Peer reviewers: Cem Onal, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Research and Treatment Centre, Baskent University Medical Faculty, 01120 Yuregir, Adana, Turkey; Ioannis Valais, PhD, Department of Medical Instrument Technology, Technological Educational Institution of Athens, Ag Spyridonos & Dimitsanis, Egaleo, Athens, 12210, Greece; Ragab Hani Donkol, Professor, Radiology Department, Aseer Central Hospital, 34 Abha, Saudi Arabia; Wellington P Martins, PhD, Departamento de Ginecologia e, Obstetrícia da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida dos Bandeirantes 3900, 8º andar, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14049-900, Brazil
S- Editor Cheng JX L- Editor Lutze M E- Editor Zheng XM