PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of worldjgastrooncoLink to Publisher's site
 
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010 May 15; 2(5): 235–241.
Published online 2010 May 15. doi:  10.4251/wjgo.v2.i5.235
PMCID: PMC2998837

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ and the ubiquitin-proteasome system in colorectal cancer

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ (PPARγ), a transcription factor of the nuclear receptor superfamily plays a significant role in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. In most experimental systems PPARγ activation has tumor suppressing effects in the colon. PPARγ is regulated at multiple levels by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). At a first level, UPS regulates PPARγ transcription. This regulation involves both PPARγ transcription specific factors and the general transcription machinery. At a second level UPS regulates PPARγ and its co-factors themselves, as PPARγ and many co-factors are proteasome substrates. At a third level of regulation, transduction pathways working in parallel but also having interrelations with PPARγ are regulated by the UPS, creating a network of regulation in the colorectal carcinogenesis-related pathways that are under UPS control. Activation of PPARγ transcription by direct pharmacologic activators and by stabilization of its molecule by proteasome inhibitors could be strategies to be exploited in colorectal cancer treatment.

Keywords: Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ, Ubiquitin, Proteasome, Colorectal cancer, Carcinogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a transcription factor of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. It has an important role in adipose tissue and in adipogenesis but is also expressed at high levels in colonic epithelium. PPARγ is involved in colorectal carcinogenesis and PPARγ-dependent transcription has anti-carcinogenic effects in many experimental colorectal cancer models while in some other instances PPARγ displays cancer promoting effects[1].

The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is a cellular regulatory machinery that leads to the degradation of multiple proteins as a mode of permanent down-regulation. Virtually all cellular processes are regulated by the UPS including processes involved in carcinogenesis such as cell cycle, apoptosis, signal transduction and DNA transcription[2]. Included in UPS-regulated processes are signal transduction effecting PPARγ activation and PPARγ-dependent transcription. PPARγ regulation by UPS as it pertains to colorectal cancer pathogenesis will be the subject of this editorial review.

PPARγ AND PPARγ-DEPENDENT TRANSCRIPTION

PPARγ together with two other PPARs (PPARα and PPARβ/δ) belongs to the orphan ligand sub-family of the nuclear hormone receptor super-family. Human PPARγ gene is located at chromosome 3p25[3]. Higher levels of protein expression are displayed in adipose tissue and colonic epithelium but many other tissues such as pancreatic β cells and vascular endothelium also express the transcription factor[4].

PPARγ molecule has a domain organization similar to all nuclear receptors. In the amino-terminal part of the protein there is a transcription regulation domain, followed by a DNA binding domain and a hinge region, while the carboxy-terminal part of the molecule is occupied by the ligand binding domain.

Various lipids such as prostaglandin 15d-PGJ2, arachidonic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid have been found to represent natural PPARγ ligands but the optimal ligand in different physiologic conditions in vivo is not well established[5,6]. Synthetic ligands of PPARγ have also been described, the most prominent of which are thiazolidinediones, a family of drugs that are used in the clinic as anti-diabetics[7]. After ligand binding, PPARγ undergoes a conformational modification, binds to co-activators and enters the nucleus to bind peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs) on target gene promoters. With the aid of co-activators such as PGC-1α (PPARγ Co-activator-1α) and Hic-5 (Hydrogen peroxide induced clone 5, alternatively named ARA55- androgen receptor activator of 55 kDa), histone acetyltransferases are recruited and acetylate histones around the transcription initiation site and pave the way for RNA polymerase to join the complex[8-11]. Among genes induced by PPARγ are, in addition to lipid metabolism regulating genes, cell cycle inhibitors p18, p21 and p27 and phosphatase inhibitor of akt kinase, PTEN[12-14]. Furthermore PPARγ acts as a suppressor of cell cycle promoters such as cyclin D and phosphatase PP2A[15,16]. The addition of these transcriptional inductions and repressions implies that PPARγ activity would have an anti-proliferative and anti-carcinogenic effect in tissues that display significant PPARγ expression such as colorectal epithelium. Indeed such an effect has been observed in most, although not all, colorectal cancer experimental systems as will be discussed in a later section.

UPS

Ubiquitination, that is the covalent attachment of the protein ubiquitin to a target protein, is a post-translational modification that can result in diverse outcomes. Ubiquitin is a 76 aminoacid protein that contains several lysine residues through which different types of chains can be formed[17]. A chain of at least four ubiquitin molecules attached to each other through a covalent link between lysine 48 of one molecule and the carboxyterminal glycine of the next molecule and finally attached to a target protein identifies this protein for proteasome degradation. Other types of ubiquitin attachments such as attachment of a single ubiquitin molecule to a target protein (mono-ubiquitination) or attachment of a ubiquitin chain to other lysine residues (e.g. Lys68) result in different outcomes and play roles in DNA repair, endocytosis, histone regulation and nuclear export. Attachment of ubiquitin to the target requires the action of three enzymes. Initially an enzyme called E1 or ubiquitin-activating enzyme binds ubiquitin and transfers it to a second enzyme called E2 or ubiquitin conjugating enzyme using energy from the degradation of ATP to ADP. Finally, a third enzyme called ubiquitin ligase or E3 transfers ubiquitin from E2 to the target protein[18].

After attachment of at least four ubiquitin molecules, the target protein is recognized by specific sub-units of 19S regulatory particle (RP) of the proteasome. 19S RP is a multi-protein structure that caps the two sides of the core particle (CP) of the proteasome, a cylinder shaped multi-unit structure with a hollow central chamber[19]. Inside this chamber takes place the enzymatic degradation of target proteins executed by three enzymatic activity-possessing subunits of the CP. CP consists of four seven-member rings that are stacked one on the other. The two peripheral rings are similar to each other and are called α rings and the two central rings are also similar to each other and are called β rings. Three of the seven sub-units of the β rings, β1, β2 and β5 possess the enzymatic activities of the proteasome; trypsin-like activity, chymotrypsin-like activity and post-glutamyl (caspase-like) activity respectively.

PPARγ IN COLORECTAL CARCINOGENESIS

Given the high expression level of PPARγ in colorectal epithelium, there is a particular interest in defining the role of PPARγ transcription in colorectal cancer. Activation of PPARγ after exposure of colorectal cancer cell lines to the natural ligand 15-S-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid (15S-HETE) and to thiazolidinedione synthetic ligands leads to growth arrest and induction of apoptosis[20-22]. Re-induction of differentiation related genes suppressed in colorectal cancer, such as cytokeratins 18 and 19 and intestinal alkaline phosphatase, is also noticed after activation of PPARγ in colorectal cancer cells[20,23]. In contrast, genes that are induced in cancer such as polyamine metabolism enzyme ornithine decarboxylase and metastasis promoting protein laminin binding protein are repressed after PPARγ activation[23].

Mice bearing human colorectal cancer xenografts display decreased rate of tumor growth after feeding with PPARγ ligands[23]. Rats in which preneoplastic colon lesions, aberrant crypt foci, have been induced by exposure to the chemical azoxymethane, also display decreased lesion formation after PPARγ activation[24,25]. A third in vivo model of PPARγ activation using Min mice, a strain of mice with activation of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene due to germline mutation, has given controversial results with some studies observing increased colonic polyps formation after PPARγ activation[26,27] while others have observed decreased tumor formation[28]. Another mouse strain with APC inactivation, Apc mice, also displayed decreased polyp formation after PPARγ activation[29]. Overall, in vivo models support a suppressive role of PPARγ in colorectal carcinogenesis[30]. Controversial results with strains bearing disabled APC may relate to the fact that APC regulates the β-catenin transcription program and different residual β-catenin activity may have diverse roles in carcinogenesis[31]. This residual activity is further modulated by increased PPARγ activity as will be discussed later.

Induction of cdk inhibitors p21, p18 and p27 by PPARγ is involved in cell cycle arrest following PPARγ activation[12,32] while interaction of PPARγ with Rb further promotes cell cycle arrest by recruiting histone deacetylase 3 and silencing transcription[33]. Phosphatase PTEN is a target of the PPARγ transcription program and its induction inhibits akt kinase activation, promoting apoptosis[14].

Expression of PPARγ has been shown in a significant percentage of tumor specimens from colorectal cancer patients[34,35] and has been co-related with improved prognosis in these patients[36]. Compared with adjacent normal colonic epithelium, PPARγ in tumor tissues displays decreased expression, further supporting a role of PPARγ suppression in colorectal carcinogenesis[37]. In contrast, another study reported that PPARγ mRNA levels were increased in colorectal tumors compared with adjacent normal colon[38]. This discrepancy may imply that PPARγ down-regulation in colon cancer is effected at the post-translational level.

PPARγ REGULATION BY THE UPS

Post-translational regulation of PPARγ involves its degradation by the UPS (Table (Table11)[39]. This is an event that follows ligand binding and nuclear receptor transcription activation and represents a negative feed-back regulation, a common theme in most nuclear receptors. This mechanism has been shown to regulate PPARγ heterodimeric partner RXR as well as retinoic acid receptor, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and androgen receptor[40-42]. Interestingly the two other PPAR family members PPARα and PPARβ/δ, although structurally similar to PPARγ, undergo a reverse regulation upon ligand binding and display delayed ubiquitination and proteasome degradation[43,44]. PPARγ degradation is dependent on ligand binding but independent of transcription per se.

Table 1
PPARγ regulation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system

PPARγ co-activator PGC-1α is also regulated by the UPS[45]. PGC-1α ubiquitination through a domain at the C-terminal part of the molecule leads to proteasome degradation. This helps in maintaining an optimal level of the co-activator for facilitation of transcription of PPARγ and also of other transcription factors for which PGC-1α functions as a co-activator such as PPARα, PPARβ/δ and estrogen related receptor α (ERRα)[46]. Proteasome inhibition leads to ubiquitinated PGC-1α accumulation and formation of non-functional aggregates. Thus, the UPS function maintains the optimal levels of PGC-1α in order to perform its co-activator function[45]. PGC-1α is additionally regulated at the transcriptional level by both PPARγ and ERRα, creating a regulation loop[47,48].

PPARγ transcriptional activity is regulated through phosphorylation by MAP kinases ERK and JNK[49-51]. Phosphorylation suppresses PPARγ activity in most cases but there are instances, such as the insulin-induced mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation of PPARγ, where this phosphorylation induces PPARγ transcriptional activity[52,53]. Given that MAP kinases and other proteins upstream in their activation cascade, such as EGFR and akt kinase, are proteasome substrates[54-56], this represents an additional point of regulation of PPARγ transcriptional activity by UPS.

PPARγ INTERACTION WITH OTHER SIGNALLING PATHWAYS AND REGULATION BY THE UPS

PPARγ transcription factor interacts with several other factors and pathways in colorectal cancer and the final output is defined by a network of interactions in which the ubiquitin-proteasome system participates at multiple levels. Some of these interactions are outlined in the following paragraphs.

β-catenin

Abundance of β-catenin, a transcription factor activated in most human colorectal cancers, is regulated by at least three parallel pathways that culminate in its ubiquitination and proteasome degradation. The first pathway involves phosphorylation by glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), facilitated by a complex in which APC takes part and results in ubiquitination by ubiquitin ligase TrCP[57,58]. In the second pathway, ubiquitination of β-catenin is performed by ubiquitin ligase Siah-1 which is induced by p53 activation[59,60]. In a third pathway, a currently unknown ubiquitin ligase mediates PPARγ-activated ubiquitination of β-catenin[61]. Tumorigenic β-catenin displays enhanced transcription activity due to mutation of serine to alanine at position 37 (S37A) rendering it resistant to GSK3β/ APC-mediated phosphorylation and ubiquitination/ proteasome degradation. This molecule can interact with PPARγ and be ubiquitinated through an alternative mechanism in order to be degraded by the proteasome[62]. In this way, PPARγ suppresses β-catenin activity through enhanced proteasome-mediated degradation which possibly is a result of induction of molecules involved in the ubiquitination process[62]. Conversely when stabilized, β-catenin inhibits PPARγ activity, an effect requiring direct interaction of the two molecules. This interaction involves the TCF binding domain of β-catenin and a catenin binding domain in PPARγ that is close to the ligand binding domain of the molecule[62]. Another study, although confirming the interaction of β-catenin with PPARγ in colorectal cancer cells, found transactivation and not repression of PPARγ activity in putative PPREs[63]. Nevertheless this study used a highly artificial system in which both genes were transfected in colon cancer cell lines before co-immunoprecipitation and reporter gene experiments[63]. Their physiologic relevance is debatable in view of the already mentioned evidence for a reverse interaction. Furthermore, in adipocytes there is a mutual antagonistic relationship between the wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway and PPARγ[64-66], strongly supporting an analogous relationship in colorectal tissue. A role of the UPS in this interaction is implied by the fact that both transcription factors are regulated by the system, although the exact regulation mechanism of the interaction must be complex.

NF-κB

Another pathway interacting with both PPARγ and with β-catenin signalling and that is regulated by the UPS is the one culminating in the activation of transcription factors of the NF-κB family. NF-κB is activated in colorectal cancer as it is down-stream of activated K-ras. NF-κB has proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects and is activated in many cancers. Its main regulation is effectuated by phosphorylation and ubiquitination of its inhibitor I-κB. This is then degraded in the proteasome, releasing NF-κB in order to enter the nucleus and begin its transcription program. Additional regulation of NF-κB results from direct interactions with PPARγ and β-catenin which both result in inhibition of NF-κB transcription[67-69]. PPARγ also trans-represses NF-κB-regulated genes indirectly through binding to promoters and recruiting co-repressors. For this action, SUMOylation [i.e. Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) binding] of PPARγ is required[70]. Metastasis mediating chemokine receptor CXCR4 is regulated at the transcription level by NF-κB and PPARγ in a reciprocal way. Thus, the interaction has the potential to regulate metastasis of colorectal cancer cells, NF-κB being a promoter while PPARγ being a suppressor of colorectal cancer metastatic process[71].

Given that all three transcription factors play significant roles in colorectal cancer and all three are regulated by the UPS, it is evident that a complex interaction with UPS is central in determining the final proliferation outcome of the neoplastic cell. NF-κB is also of paramount importance in inflammation and inflammation-induced carcinogenesis. Nuclear receptors in general and PPARγ in particular can antagonize this action, having anti-inflammatory effects[72].

Calcium signaling

PPARγ activation has also been found to inhibit proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer cell lines by interference with calcium signalling[73]. PPARγ induces calcineurin inhibitor DSCR1 (Down syndrome candidate region 1, also known as RCAN1- regulator of calcineurin 1 and calcipressin). This induction of the endogenous inhibitor of phosphatase calcineurin results in the maintainance of transcription factor NFAT (Nuclear factor of activated T cells) in a phosphorylated and inactive form[74]. DSCR1 was initially recognized as a protein playing a role in the pathogenesis of Down syndrome[75] and is now recognized as playing a role in other pathologies such as Alzheimer’s disease, stroke and cardiac hypertrophy[74]. More recently its role in carcinogenesis has been described[76]. DSCR1 is a proteasome substrate and its proteasome degradation is enhanced through the action of protein CREB (c-AMP response element-binding protein)[77]. PPARγ may decrease this enhanced degradation by interfering with CREB. RNA-mediated knockdown of DSCR1 results in inability of PPARγ to inhibit colorectal cancer cell proliferation and invasion[73], indicating the importance of this protein and of inhibiting calcium signalling in mediating PPARγ anti-neoplastic effects. PPARγ involvement in calcium signalling regulation is of particular relevance in colorectal cancer given the extensive cross-talk of calcium with the K-ras oncogene[78].

Transforming growth factor β

Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) is a ligand that initiates signal transduction after ligation of its cell surface receptors TβRI and TβRII. This ligation leads to activation of intracellular mediators Smad2 and Smad3 which heterodimerize with partner protein Smad4 [also called deleted in pancreatic cancer 4 (DPC4)] and enter the nucleus to activate transcription in collaboration with various other transcription factors[79,80]. TGF-β signalling is regulated by the UPS, as Smads are proteasome substrates for degradation after ubiquitination[81-83]. TGF-β signalling can have pro-carcinogenic or anti-carcinogenic effect depending on which other pathways are activated in a particular cell environment[84]. In particular, MAPK activation down-stream of activated K-ras oncogene can direct TGF-β signalling towards cancer-promotion. This is of great importance in colorectal cancers as they bear an activating K-ras mutation in up to half the cases. PPARγ suppresses TGF-β1 production through a mechanism involving inhibition of kinase p70 Ribosomal S6 kinase-1. This inhibition keeps transcription factor Zinc finger 9 in an inactive form that prevents it from transcribing TGF-β1 gene[85]. As a result TGF-β1-dependent induction of chemokines Interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 is prevented[86]. An additional point where PPARγ and TGF-β signal transduction inter-connect is their common induction of transcription factor TSC-22 (Transforming growth factor-stimulated clone 22). This is a zinc finger transcription factor that causes growth inhibition in colonocytes through induction of CDK inhibitor p21[87].

CONCLUSION

Colorectal carcinogenesis involves the acquisition of genetic lesions over time, leading to progression from hyperplasia to adenoma to carcinoma. Most common genetic lesions include APC mutations, activating β-catenin transcription, K-ras mutations and Smad4 (DPC4) mutations. All these pathways and others involved in colorectal carcinogenesis are regulated by the UPS.

PPARγ is a nuclear receptor transcription factor with important roles in colorectal carcinogenesis. As is the case with several transcription factors of the nuclear receptor super-family, it is regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. This system modulates PPARγ action not only by directly degrading the transcription factor itself but also through other transcription factors and other proteins working in parallel as a network. These multiple levels of regulation will have to be taken into account, using the new tools of molecular biology such as whole genome interrogations, when designing new rational targeted therapies and combinations. Both PPARγ and the UPS have been manipulated pharmacologically in the clinic, the former with the use (for the treatment of diabetes) of activators thiazolidinediones and the latter with the use of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. A combined use in order to activate the transcription factor in at least two levels could be attractive for the development, of drugs for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Determination of subsets of colorectal cancers that, due to specific molecular lesions, could be particularly sensitive to PPARγ activation would be of importance in this development.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Paul J Higgins, Professor and Director, Center for Cell Biology & Cancer Research, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, New York, NY 12208, United States

S- Editor Li LF L- Editor Hughes D E- Editor Yang C

References

1. Voutsadakis IA. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) and colorectal carcinogenesis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007;133:917–928. [PubMed]
2. Voutsadakis IA. The ubiquitin-proteasome system in colorectal cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782:800–808. [PubMed]
3. Vigouroux C, Fajas L, Khallouf E, Meier M, Gyapay G, Lascols O, Auwerx J, Weissenbach J, Capeau J, Magré J. Human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2: genetic mapping, identification of a variant in the coding sequence, and exclusion as the gene responsible for lipoatrophic diabetes. Diabetes. 1998;47:490–492. [PubMed]
4. Fajas L, Auboeuf D, Raspé E, Schoonjans K, Lefebvre AM, Saladin R, Najib J, Laville M, Fruchart JC, Deeb S, et al. The organization, promoter analysis, and expression of the human PPARgamma gene. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:18779–18789. [PubMed]
5. Bell-Parikh LC, Ide T, Lawson JA, McNamara P, Reilly M, FitzGerald GA. Biosynthesis of 15-deoxy-delta12,14-PGJ2 and the ligation of PPARgamma. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:945–955. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Kliewer SA, Xu HE, Lambert MH, Willson TM. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: from genes to physiology. Recent Prog Horm Res. 2001;56:239–263. [PubMed]
7. Yki-Järvinen H. Thiazolidinediones. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1106–1118. [PubMed]
8. Puigserver P, Spiegelman BM. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1 alpha): transcriptional coactivator and metabolic regulator. Endocr Rev. 2003;24:78–90. [PubMed]
9. Drori S, Girnun GD, Tou L, Szwaya JD, Mueller E, Xia K, Shivdasani RA, Spiegelman BM. Hic-5 regulates an epithelial program mediated by PPARgamma. Genes Dev. 2005;19:362–375. [PubMed]
10. Heitzer MD, DeFranco DB. Hic-5, an adaptor-like nuclear receptor coactivator. Nucl Recept Signal. 2006;4:e019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Fujimoto N, Yeh S, Kang HY, Inui S, Chang HC, Mizokami A, Chang C. Cloning and characterization of androgen receptor coactivator, ARA55, in human prostate. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:8316–8321. [PubMed]
12. Morrison RF, Farmer SR. Role of PPARgamma in regulating a cascade expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p18(INK4c) and p21(Waf1/Cip1), during adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:17088–17097. [PubMed]
13. Sugimura A, Kiriyama Y, Nochi H, Tsuchiya H, Tamoto K, Sakurada Y, Ui M, Tokumitsu Y. Troglitazone suppresses cell growth of myeloid leukemia cell lines by induction of p21WAF1/CIP1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;261:833–837. [PubMed]
14. Patel L, Pass I, Coxon P, Downes CP, Smith SA, Macphee CH. Tumor suppressor and anti-inflammatory actions of PPARgamma agonists are mediated via upregulation of PTEN. Curr Biol. 2001;11:764–768. [PubMed]
15. Wang C, Fu M, D'Amico M, Albanese C, Zhou JN, Brownlee M, Lisanti MP, Chatterjee VK, Lazar MA, Pestell RG. Inhibition of cellular proliferation through IkappaB kinase-independent and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent repression of cyclin D1. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:3057–3070. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Altiok S, Xu M, Spiegelman BM. PPARgamma induces cell cycle withdrawal: inhibition of E2F/DP DNA-binding activity via down-regulation of PP2A. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1987–1998. [PubMed]
17. Pickart CM. Back to the future with ubiquitin. Cell. 2004;116:181–190. [PubMed]
18. Voutsadakis IA. Pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma and therapeutic implications: the roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and Cox-2. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:252–285. [PubMed]
19. Rechsteiner M. The 26S Proteasome.Vol.1. In: Mayer RJ, Ciechanover A, Rechsteiner M, editors. Protein degradation-ubiquitin and the chemistry of life. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2005. pp. 220–247.
20. Kitamura S, Miyazaki Y, Shinomura Y, Kondo S, Kanayama S, Matsuzawa Y. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma induces growth arrest and differentiation markers of human colon cancer cells. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999;90:75–80. [PubMed]
21. Tsujie M, Nakamori S, Okami J, Hayashi N, Hiraoka N, Nagano H, Dono K, Umeshita K, Sakon M, Monden M. Thiazolidinediones inhibit growth of gastrointestinal, biliary, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma/retinoid X receptor alpha pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2003;289:143–151. [PubMed]
22. Chen GG, Xu H, Lee JF, Subramaniam M, Leung KL, Wang SH, Chan UP, Spelsberg TC. 15-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid arrests growth of colorectal cancer cells via a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent pathway. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:837–843. [PubMed]
23. Sarraf P, Mueller E, Jones D, King FJ, DeAngelo DJ, Partridge JB, Holden SA, Chen LB, Singer S, Fletcher C, et al. Differentiation and reversal of malignant changes in colon cancer through PPARgamma. Nat Med. 1998;4:1046–1052. [PubMed]
24. Tanaka T, Kohno H, Yoshitani S, Takashima S, Okumura A, Murakami A, Hosokawa M. Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma inhibit chemically induced colitis and formation of aberrant crypt foci in rats. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2424–2428. [PubMed]
25. Kohno H, Yoshitani S, Takashima S, Okumura A, Hosokawa M, Yamaguchi N, Tanaka T. Troglitazone, a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, inhibits chemically-induced aberrant crypt foci in rats. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001;92:396–403. [PubMed]
26. Lefebvre AM, Chen I, Desreumaux P, Najib J, Fruchart JC, Geboes K, Briggs M, Heyman R, Auwerx J. Activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma promotes the development of colon tumors in C57BL/6J-APCMin/+ mice. Nat Med. 1998;4:1053–1057. [PubMed]
27. Saez E, Tontonoz P, Nelson MC, Alvarez JG, Ming UT, Baird SM, Thomazy VA, Evans RM. Activators of the nuclear receptor PPARgamma enhance colon polyp formation. Nat Med. 1998;4:1058–1061. [PubMed]
28. Niho N, Takahashi M, Shoji Y, Takeuchi Y, Matsubara S, Sugimura T, Wakabayashi K. Dose-dependent suppression of hyperlipidemia and intestinal polyp formation in Min mice by pioglitazone, a PPAR gamma ligand. Cancer Sci. 2003;94:960–964. [PubMed]
29. Niho N, Takahashi M, Kitamura T, Shoji Y, Itoh M, Noda T, Sugimura T, Wakabayashi K. Concomitant suppression of hyperlipidemia and intestinal polyp formation in Apc-deficient mice by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6090–6095. [PubMed]
30. Necela BM, Thompson EA. Pathophysiological Roles of PPARgamma in Gastrointestinal Epithelial Cells. PPAR Res. 2008;2008:148687. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Kim K, Pang KM, Evans M, Hay ED. Overexpression of beta-catenin induces apoptosis independent of its transactivation function with LEF-1 or the involvement of major G1 cell cycle regulators. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:3509–3523. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Chen F, Harrison LE. Ciglitazone-induced cellular anti-proliferation increases p27kip1 protein levels through both increased transcriptional activity and inhibition of proteasome degradation. Cell Signal. 2005;17:809–816. [PubMed]
33. Fajas L, Egler V, Reiter R, Miard S, Lefebvre AM, Auwerx J. PPARgamma controls cell proliferation and apoptosis in an RB-dependent manner. Oncogene. 2003;22:4186–4193. [PubMed]
34. Theocharis S, Giaginis C, Parasi A, Margeli A, Kakisis J, Agapitos E, Kouraklis G. Expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in colon cancer: correlation with histopathological parameters, cell cycle-related molecules, and patients' survival. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:2305–2311. [PubMed]
35. Allred CD, Kilgore MW. Selective activation of PPARgamma in breast, colon, and lung cancer cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;235:21–29. [PubMed]
36. Ogino S, Shima K, Baba Y, Nosho K, Irahara N, Kure S, Chen L, Toyoda S, Kirkner GJ, Wang YL, et al. Colorectal cancer expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG, PPARgamma) is associated with good prognosis. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1242–1250. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Konstantinopoulos PA, Vandoros GP, Sotiropoulou-Bonikou G, Kominea A, Papavassiliou AG. NF-kappaB/PPAR gamma and/or AP-1/PPAR gamma 'on/off' switches and induction of CBP in colon adenocarcinomas: correlation with COX-2 expression. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:57–68. [PubMed]
38. Linsalata M, Giannini R, Notarnicola M, Cavallini A. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase gene expressions are significantly correlated in human colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:191. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Hauser S, Adelmant G, Sarraf P, Wright HM, Mueller E, Spiegelman BM. Degradation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is linked to ligand-dependent activation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:18527–18533. [PubMed]
40. Zhu J, Gianni M, Kopf E, Honoré N, Chelbi-Alix M, Koken M, Quignon F, Rochette-Egly C, de Thé H. Retinoic acid induces proteasome-dependent degradation of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARalpha) and oncogenic RARalpha fusion proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:14807–14812. [PubMed]
41. Alarid ET, Bakopoulos N, Solodin N. Proteasome-mediated proteolysis of estrogen receptor: a novel component in autologous down-regulation. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13:1522–1534. [PubMed]
42. Nawaz Z, Lonard DM, Dennis AP, Smith CL, O'Malley BW. Proteasome-dependent degradation of the human estrogen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:1858–1862. [PubMed]
43. Genini D, Carbone GM, Catapano CV. Multiple Interactions between Peroxisome Proliferators-Activated Receptors and the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Implications for Cancer Pathogenesis. PPAR Res. 2008;2008:195065. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Genini D, Catapano CV. Block of nuclear receptor ubiquitination. A mechanism of ligand-dependent control of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta activity. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:11776–11785. [PubMed]
45. Sano M, Tokudome S, Shimizu N, Yoshikawa N, Ogawa C, Shirakawa K, Endo J, Katayama T, Yuasa S, Ieda M, et al. Intramolecular control of protein stability, subnuclear compartmentalization, and coactivator function of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1alpha. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:25970–25980. [PubMed]
46. Liu D, Zhang Z, Teng CT. Estrogen-related receptor-gamma and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha regulate estrogen-related receptor-alpha gene expression via a conserved multi-hormone response element. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005;34:473–487. [PubMed]
47. Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 coactivators, energy homeostasis, and metabolism. Endocr Rev. 2006;27:728–735. [PubMed]
48. Huss JM, Kopp RP, Kelly DP. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) coactivates the cardiac-enriched nuclear receptors estrogen-related receptor-alpha and -gamma. Identification of novel leucine-rich interaction motif within PGC-1alpha. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:40265–40274. [PubMed]
49. Adams M, Reginato MJ, Shao D, Lazar MA, Chatterjee VK. Transcriptional activation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is inhibited by phosphorylation at a consensus mitogen-activated protein kinase site. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:5128–5132. [PubMed]
50. Camp HS, Tafuri SR, Leff T. c-Jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma1 and negatively regulates its transcriptional activity. Endocrinology. 1999;140:392–397. [PubMed]
51. Camp HS, Tafuri SR. Regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activity by mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:10811–10816. [PubMed]
52. Diradourian C, Girard J, Pégorier JP. Phosphorylation of PPARs: from molecular characterization to physiological relevance. Biochimie. 2005;87:33–38. [PubMed]
53. Zhang B, Berger J, Zhou G, Elbrecht A, Biswas S, White-Carrington S, Szalkowski D, Moller DE. Insulin- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation and activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:31771–31774. [PubMed]
54. Mikalsen T, Johannessen M, Moens U. Sequence- and position-dependent tagging protects extracellular-regulated kinase 3 protein from 26S proteasome-mediated degradation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37:2513–2520. [PubMed]
55. Adachi M, Katsumura KR, Fujii K, Kobayashi S, Aoki H, Matsuzaki M. Proteasome-dependent decrease in Akt by growth factors in vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 2003;554:77–80. [PubMed]
56. Kesarwala AH, Samrakandi MM, Piwnica-Worms D. Proteasome inhibition blocks ligand-induced dynamic processing and internalization of epidermal growth factor receptor via altered receptor ubiquitination and phosphorylation. Cancer Res. 2009;69:976–983. [PubMed]
57. Wong NA, Pignatelli M. Beta-catenin--a linchpin in colorectal carcinogenesis? Am J Pathol. 2002;160:389–401. [PubMed]
58. Ilyas M. Wnt signalling and the mechanistic basis of tumour development. J Pathol. 2005;205:130–144. [PubMed]
59. Liu J, Stevens J, Rote CA, Yost HJ, Hu Y, Neufeld KL, White RL, Matsunami N. Siah-1 mediates a novel beta-catenin degradation pathway linking p53 to the adenomatous polyposis coli protein. Mol Cell. 2001;7:927–936. [PubMed]
60. Matsuzawa SI, Reed JC. Siah-1, SIP, and Ebi collaborate in a novel pathway for beta-catenin degradation linked to p53 responses. Mol Cell. 2001;7:915–926. [PubMed]
61. Sharma C, Pradeep A, Wong L, Rana A, Rana B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation can regulate beta-catenin levels via a proteasome-mediated and adenomatous polyposis coli-independent pathway. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:35583–35594. [PubMed]
62. Liu J, Wang H, Zuo Y, Farmer SR. Functional interaction between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and beta-catenin. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:5827–5837. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Jansson EA, Are A, Greicius G, Kuo IC, Kelly D, Arulampalam V, Pettersson S. The Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway targets PPARgamma activity in colon cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:1460–1465. [PubMed]
64. Moldes M, Zuo Y, Morrison RF, Silva D, Park BH, Liu J, Farmer SR. Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor gamma suppresses Wnt/beta-catenin signalling during adipogenesis. Biochem J. 2003;376:607–613. [PubMed]
65. Liu J, Farmer SR. Regulating the balance between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and beta-catenin signaling during adipogenesis. A glycogen synthase kinase 3beta phosphorylation-defective mutant of beta-catenin inhibits expression of a subset of adipogenic genes. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:45020–45027. [PubMed]
66. Ross SE, Hemati N, Longo KA, Bennett CN, Lucas PC, Erickson RL, MacDougald OA. Inhibition of adipogenesis by Wnt signaling. Science. 2000;289:950–953. [PubMed]
67. Wahli W. A gut feeling of the PXR, PPAR and NF-kappaB connection. J Intern Med. 2008;263:613–619. [PubMed]
68. Moraes LA, Piqueras L, Bishop-Bailey D. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and inflammation. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;110:371–385. [PubMed]
69. Deng J, Miller SA, Wang HY, Xia W, Wen Y, Zhou BP, Li Y, Lin SY, Hung MC. beta-catenin interacts with and inhibits NF-kappa B in human colon and breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002;2:323–334. [PubMed]
70. Pascual G, Fong AL, Ogawa S, Gamliel A, Li AC, Perissi V, Rose DW, Willson TM, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK. A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-gamma. Nature. 2005;437:759–763. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Richard CL, Lowthers EL, Blay J. 15-Deoxy-delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) down-regulates CXCR4 on carcinoma cells through PPARgamma- and NFkappaB-mediated pathways. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313:3446–3458. [PubMed]
72. Ogawa S, Lozach J, Benner C, Pascual G, Tangirala RK, Westin S, Hoffmann A, Subramaniam S, David M, Rosenfeld MG, et al. Molecular determinants of crosstalk between nuclear receptors and toll-like receptors. Cell. 2005;122:707–721. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Bush CR, Havens JM, Necela BM, Su W, Chen L, Yanagisawa M, Anastasiadis PZ, Guerra R, Luxon BA, Thompson EA. Functional genomic analysis reveals cross-talk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and calcium signaling in human colorectal cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:23387–23401. [PubMed]
74. Harris CD, Ermak G, Davies KJ. Multiple roles of the DSCR1 (Adapt78 or RCAN1) gene and its protein product calcipressin 1 (or RCAN1) in disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:2477–2486. [PubMed]
75. Fuentes JJ, Pritchard MA, Planas AM, Bosch A, Ferrer I, Estivill X. A new human gene from the Down syndrome critical region encodes a proline-rich protein highly expressed in fetal brain and heart. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:1935–1944. [PubMed]
76. Espinosa AV, Shinohara M, Porchia LM, Chung YJ, McCarty S, Saji M, Ringel MD. Regulator of calcineurin 1 modulates cancer cell migration in vitro. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009;26:517–526. [PubMed]
77. Seo SR, Chung KC. CREB activates proteasomal degradation of DSCR1/RCAN1. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:1889–1893. [PubMed]
78. Cullen PJ, Lockyer PJ. Integration of calcium and Ras signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:339–348. [PubMed]
79. Wakefield LM, Roberts AB. TGF-beta signaling: positive and negative effects on tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12:22–29. [PubMed]
80. Labbé E, Letamendia A, Attisano L. Association of Smads with lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1/T cell-specific factor mediates cooperative signaling by the transforming growth factor-beta and wnt pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8358–8363. [PubMed]
81. Inoue Y, Imamura T. Regulation of TGF-beta family signaling by E3 ubiquitin ligases. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:2107–2112. [PubMed]
82. Gao S, Alarcón C, Sapkota G, Rahman S, Chen PY, Goerner N, Macias MJ, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Massagué J. Ubiquitin ligase Nedd4L targets activated Smad2/3 to limit TGF-beta signaling. Mol Cell. 2009;36:457–468. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Saha D, Datta PK, Beauchamp RD. Oncogenic ras represses transforming growth factor-beta /Smad signaling by degrading tumor suppressor Smad4. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:29531–29537. [PubMed]
84. Attisano L, Wrana JL. Signal transduction by the TGF-beta superfamily. Science. 2002;296:1646–1647. [PubMed]
85. Lee SJ, Yang EK, Kim SG. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and retinoic acid X receptor alpha represses the TGFbeta1 gene via PTEN-mediated p70 ribosomal S6 kinase-1 inhibition: role for Zf9 dephosphorylation. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;70:415–425. [PubMed]
86. Wang WM, Zhang HD, Jin YM, Zhu BB, Chen N. PPAR-gamma agonists inhibit TGF-beta1-induced chemokine expression in human tubular epithelial cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009;30:107–112. [PubMed]
87. Gupta RA, Sarraf P, Brockman JA, Shappell SB, Raftery LA, Willson TM, DuBois RN. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and transforming growth factor-beta pathways inhibit intestinal epithelial cell growth by regulating levels of TSC-22. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:7431–7438. [PubMed]

Articles from World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc