Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of f1000bioLatest ContentReportsReportsReports
F1000 Biol Rep. 2010; 2: 78.
Published online 2010 November 11. doi:  10.3410/B2-78
PMCID: PMC2998803

Fibrosis: recent advances in myofibroblast biology and new therapeutic perspectives


The crucial role of the myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrosis development is well established. This review discusses the mechanisms of myofibroblast action and the new findings that may develop into therapeutic strategies during the next few years.

Introduction and context

Tissue destruction by organ fibrosis contributes to the lethal outcomes associated with heart, lung, liver, kidney, and skin diseases. The cell responsible for the detrimental fibrotic tissue contractures is the myofibroblast, which has a phenotype characterized by excessive production of collagenous extracellular matrix (ECM) and tensile force [1]. The concept that the myofibroblast plays a pivotal role in the establishment of fibrotic conditions has paved the way for a new approach in the understanding of the mechanisms of these pathologic situations [2]. In particular, it has become accepted that mechanical force generation by myofibroblasts, which in turn depends on the neo-expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in stress fibers of these cells, regulates essential phenomena for tissue remodeling, such as cytokine synthesis and ECM component production [2]. The myofibroblast participates in a variety of phenomena, including embryologic development, organ fibrosis, and the stroma reaction to epithelial tumors [1]. This widespread occurrence suggests that the term myofibroblast describes a functional status rather than a fixed cell type. This assumption has been supported by recent findings indicating that myofibroblasts originate from a spectrum of cellular sources depending on the physiological or pathological situation [1]. Myofibroblast origin and its tissue environment should be considered when planning new therapeutic strategies that aim at decreasing myofibroblast number or activity.

Major recent advances

The list of cells from which myofibroblasts can derive has grown impressively during the last years. It includes local fibroblasts, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, pericytes, hepatic perisinusoidal cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and bone marrow-derived cells known as fibrocytes [1,3]. Most attention has been given to the fibrocyte as a possible myofibroblast precursor [4] and the phenomena of epithelial- and endothelial-mesenchymal transition as myofibroblast sources, particularly during lung and kidney fibrosis [5,6]. Transition of epithelial cells all the way to the myofibroblast phenotype is inducible in culture and regulated by different signaling pathways [7,8]. However, the relative contribution of myofibroblast precursors remains to be determined. As one would intuitively expect, it appears likely that in most situations local fibroblasts represent the major source of myofibroblasts [1]. The local derivation of myofibroblasts from mesenchymal rather than epithelial or endothelial cells has recently been documented in a model of renal interstitial fibrosis by means of genetic lineage tracing [9].

At present there is no accepted therapy for fibrotic diseases [10]. A number of previous and recent antifibrotic strategies attempt to interfere with myofibroblast formation by targeting key factors in the differentiation process (Figure 1). It is well established that myofibroblast differentiation and organ fibrosis are predominantly controlled by transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) [11] and the ED-A (extra domain A) found in cellular fibronectin [12]. Moreover, several cytokines and chemokines (and their receptors), as well as coagulation factors and ECM components, have been implicated in this process [13-18]. It is likely that the heterogeneity of the myofibroblast origin requires specific factors and specific mechanical conditions in each situation.

Figure 1.
Targeting the myofibroblast

Fibrosis is usually diagnosed when tissue destruction is already progressing, and it is possible that therapies will have to target the resident myofibroblast population. For this, aiming at the contractile apparatus is allegedly the most straight forward and promising strategy to inhibit myofibroblast function (Figure 1). A new direction, which has proven experimentally successful, is based on the observation that intracellular delivery of the α-SMA amino-terminal sequence Ac-EEED inhibits the incorporation of this protein in myofibroblast stress fibers, thus reducing force production as well as collagen type I synthesis by myofibroblasts in vitro; moreover, it significantly inhibits experimental wound contraction in vivo [19]. Due to its relative specificity for α-SMA-expressing myofibroblast stress fibers, this peptide appears as a good candidate for topical (e.g., burn scars) and systemic (e.g., organ fibrosis) administration.

Another promising strategy to induce myofibroblast disappearance is to stimulate them to go into apoptosis. Two major intracellular pathways have been identified that act pro-survival (or anti-apoptotic) for the myofibroblast: focal adhesion kinase signaling in cell ECM adhesions and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT signaling. Focal adhesion kinase activation protects myofibroblasts from going into apoptosis in response to the loss of cell adhesion, a phenomenon called anoikis [20]. TGF-β1 and endothelin-1 have been shown to independently activate the PI3K-AKT pathway and thereby render myofibroblasts apoptosis-resistant [21]. Development of protein kinase inhibitors as specific inducers of myofibroblast apoptosis is an exciting new avenue in fighting fibrosis [22]. Other strategies could include myofibroblast-specific delivery of apoptosis-inducing drugs as applied in a mouse model of liver fibrosis [23].

Inducing myofibroblast disappearance does not necessarily include their killing; interrupting the auto/paracrine production of active TGF-β1 leads to myofibroblast de-differentiation, at least in vitro [24]. However, attempts to use general inhibitors of TGF-β1 have been relatively unsuccessful, showing that fibrosis development is a more complex phenomenon than expected [25-28]. The limitation of such global strategies is the interference of the beneficial effects of the pleiotrophic TGF-β1, such as controlling homeostasis of epithelial, vascular, endothelial, and immune cells. Therefore, more promising strategies may be to prevent latent TGF-β1 activation in a cell-type-specific manner rather than blocking already active TGF-β1. TGF-β1 is secreted together with LAP (latency-associated peptide), forming a large complex with latent TGF-β1 binding protein 1 (LTBP-1) in the ECM [29]. Epithelial cells activate latent TGF-β1 via integrin αvβ6 [30,31], which requires ECM binding mediated by LTBP-1 [29]. Inhibition of the epithelium-specific αvβ6 integrin protects from lung, kidney, and bile duct fibrosis [32-35]. In addition, integrins αvβ3, αvβ8, and αvβ5 play a role in latent TGF-β1 activation by fibroblastic cells, either directly or in a process involving proteases [11,36-40]. We have described a novel mechanical mechanism of latent TGF-β1 activation for myofibroblasts that, literally, pulls on the large latent complex using the integrin αvβ5 [41].

Future directions

Blocking specific integrins is a promising future strategy to control the development of myofibroblasts in fibrotic disorders (Figure 1). In addition to blocking the latent TGF-β1-activating integrin αvβ5 [41-44], inhibition of integrin α3 [8,45], α11, [46] αvβ3 [44,47], and β1 [48] were shown to block myofibroblast development and may be developed into future therapies. The latter integrins are all implicated in myofibroblast mechanoperception and transduction. It becomes increasingly clear that myofibroblast differentiation crucially depends on mechanical factors such as ECM stiffness and intracellular tension. Mechanical stress determines the stress fiber localization of α-SMA [49], modulates α-SMA promoter activity and protein expression in a process that involves the myocardin-related transcription factor [7,48,50], and modulates the bioactivity of TGF-β1 [41]. Hence, releasing myofibroblasts from stress – for example, using the Ac-EEED peptide [51] – will have a profound and long-term effect on myofibroblast persistence and may even induce myofibroblast apoptosis [52].


The work of BH is supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant# 3100A0-113733/1), the Heart and Stroke Foundation Ontario (grant# NA7086), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant# 210820).


alpha-smooth muscle actin
extracellular matrix
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
latent transforming growth factor β1 binding protein 1
transforming growth factor β1


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found at:


Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


1. Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Galli A, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani G. The myofibroblast: one function, multiple origins. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:1807–16. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070112. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:349–63. doi: 10.1038/nrm809. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Hinz B. The myofibroblast in connective tissue repair and regeneration. In: Ralphs CAJ, editor. Regenerative Medicine and Biomaterials for the Repair of Connective Tissues. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2010. pp. 39–82.
4. Herzog EL, Bucala R. Fibrocytes in health and disease. Exp Hematol. 2010;38:548–56. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.03.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139:871–90. [PubMed]
6. Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1420–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI39104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Masszi A, Speight P, Charbonney E, Lodyga M, Nakano H, Szaszi K, Kapus A. Fate-determining mechanisms in epithelial-myofibroblast transition: major inhibitory role for Smad3. J Cell Biol. 2010;188:383–99. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200906155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Kim KK, Wei Y, Szekeres C, Kugler MC, Wolters PJ, Hill ML, Frank JA, Brumwell AN, Wheeler SE, Kreidberg JA, Chapman HA. Epithelial cell alpha3beta1 integrin links beta-catenin and Smad signaling to promote myofibroblast formation and pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:213–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] F1000 Factor 6
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 23 Jan 2009
9. Humphreys BD, Lin SL, Kobayashi A, Hudson TE, Nowlin BT, Bonventre JV, Valerius MT, McMahon AP, Duffield JS. Fate tracing reveals the pericyte and not epithelial origin of myofibroblasts in kidney fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:85–97. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090517. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 10
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 22 Dec 2009, Gregory Dressler 04 Jan 2010
10. Ryu JH, Daniels CE. Advances in the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. F1000 Med Rep. 2010;2:28. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Wipff PJ, Hinz B. Integrins and the activation of latent transforming growth factor beta1 - an intimate relationship. Eur J Cell Biol. 2008;87:601–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.01.012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Muro AF, Moretti FA, Moore BB, Yan M, Atrasz RG, Wilke CA, Flaherty KR, Martinez FJ, Tsui JL, Sheppard D, Baralle FE, Toews GB, White ES. An essential role for fibronectin extra type III domain A in pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:638–45. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200708-1291OC. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Yates CC, Krishna P, Whaley D, Bodnar R, Turner T, Wells A. Lack of CXC chemokine receptor 3 signaling leads to hypertrophic and hypercellular scarring. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:1743–55. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090564. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 8
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 16 Mar 2010
14. Bogatkevich GS, Ludwicka-Bradley A, Silver RM. Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, demonstrates antifibrotic effects on lung fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:3455–64. doi: 10.1002/art.24935. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 02 Dec 2009
15. Simpson RM, Meran S, Thomas D, Stephens P, Bowen T, Steadman R, Phillips A. Age-related changes in pericellular hyaluronan organization leads to impaired dermal fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation. Am J Pathol. 2009;175:1915–28. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090045. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 8
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 16 Oct 2009
16. Asano Y. Future treatments in systemic sclerosis. J Dermatol. 2010;37:54–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00758.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Webber J, Jenkins RH, Meran S, Phillips A, Steadman R. Modulation of TGFbeta1-dependent myofibroblast differentiation by hyaluronan. Am J Pathol. 2009;175:148–60. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080837. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6
Evaluated by Steve Lye 22 Sep 2009
18. Liu T, Hu B, Choi YY, Chung M, Ullenbruch M, Yu H, Lowe JB, Phan SH. Notch1 signaling in FIZZ1 induction of myofibroblast differentiation. Am J Pathol. 2009;174:1745–55. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080618. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 8
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 14 Apr 2009
19. Hinz B, Gabbiani G, Chaponnier C. The NH2-terminal peptide of alpha-smooth muscle actin inhibits force generation by the myofibroblast in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:657–63. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200201049. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6
Evaluated by Manfred Schliwa 17 Jun 2002
20. Horowitz JC, Rogers DS, Sharma V, Vittal R, White ES, Cui Z, Thannickal VJ. Combinatorial activation of FAK and AKT by transforming growth factor-beta1 confers an anoikis-resistant phenotype to myofibroblasts. Cell Signal. 2007;19:761–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.10.001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Kulasekaran P, Scavone CA, Rogers DS, Arenberg DA, Thannickal VJ, Horowitz JC. Endothelin-1 and transforming growth factor-beta1 independently induce fibroblast resistance to apoptosis via AKT activation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2009;41:484–93. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0447OC. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. de Andrade JA, Thannickal VJ. Innovative approaches to the therapy of fibrosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;21:649–55. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328330da9b. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Douglass A, Wallace K, Parr R, Park J, Durward E, Broadbent I, Barelle C, Porter AJ, Wright MC. Antibody-targeted myofibroblast apoptosis reduces fibrosis during sustained liver injury. J Hepatol. 2008;49:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.032. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6
Evaluated by Stuart Forbes 07 May 2008
24. Hinz B, Celetta G, Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Chaponnier C. Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression upregulates fibroblast contractile activity. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:2730–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Varga J, Pasche B. Transforming growth factor beta as a therapeutic target in systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:200–6. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.26. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Howell JE, McAnulty RJ. TGF-beta: its role in asthma and therapeutic potential. Curr Drug Targets. 2006;7:547–65. doi: 10.2174/138945006776818692. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Meier K, Nanney LB. Emerging new drugs for scar reduction. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2006;11:39–47. doi: 10.1517/14728214.11.1.39. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Liu X, Hu H, Yin JQ. Therapeutic strategies against TGF-beta signaling pathway in hepatic fibrosis. Liver Int. 2006;26:8–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01192.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Annes JP, Chen Y, Munger JS, Rifkin DB. Integrin alphaVbeta6-mediated activation of latent TGF-beta requires the latent TGF-beta binding protein-1. J Cell Biol. 2004;165:723–34. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200312172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Jenkins RG, Su X, Su G, Scotton CJ, Camerer E, Laurent GJ, Davis GE, Chambers RC, Matthay MA, Sheppard D. Ligation of protease-activated receptor 1 enhances alpha(v)beta6 integrin-dependent TGF-beta activation and promotes acute lung injury. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1606–14. doi: 10.1172/JCI27183. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Aluwihare P, Munger JS. What the lung has taught us about latent TGF-beta activation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008;39:499–502. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0003ED. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Horan GS, Wood S, Ona V, Li DJ, Lukashev ME, Weinreb PH, Simon KJ, Hahm K, Allaire NE, Rinaldi NJ, Goyal J, Feghali-Bostwick CA, Matteson EL, O'Hara C, Lafyatis R, Davis GS, Huang X, Sheppard D, Violette SM. Partial inhibition of integrin alpha(v)beta6 prevents pulmonary fibrosis without exacerbating inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:56–65. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200706-805O. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Hahm K, Lukashev ME, Luo Y, Yang WJ, Dolinski BM, Weinreb PH, Simon KJ, Chun Wang L, Leone DR, Lobb RR, McCrann DJ, Allaire NE, Horan GS, Fogo A, Kalluri R, Shield CF, 3rd, Sheppard D, Gardner HA, Violette SM. Alphav beta6 integrin regulates renal fibrosis and inflammation in Alport mouse. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:110–25. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060158. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Wang B, Dolinski BM, Kikuchi N, Leone DR, Peters MG, Weinreb PH, Violette SM, Bissell DM. Role of alphavbeta6 integrin in acute biliary fibrosis. Hepatology. 2007;46:1404–12. doi: 10.1002/hep.21849. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Patsenker E, Popov Y, Stickel F, Jonczyk A, Goodman SL, Schuppan D. Inhibition of integrin alphavbeta6 on cholangiocytes blocks transforming growth factor-beta activation and retards biliary fibrosis progression. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:660–70. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 8
Evaluated by Domenico Alvaro 17 Jun 2008
36. Jenkins G. The role of proteases in transforming growth factor-beta activation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:1068–78. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.11.026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Margadant C, Sonnenberg A. Integrin-TGF-beta crosstalk in fibrosis, cancer and wound healing. EMBO Rep. 2010;11:97–105. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.276. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Tenney RM, Discher DE. Stem cells, microenvironment mechanics, and growth factor activation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:630–5. doi: 10.1016/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Goodwin A, Jenkins G. Role of integrin-mediated TGFbeta activation in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37:849–54. doi: 10.1042/BST0370849. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Nishimura SL. Integrin-mediated transforming growth factor-beta activation, a potential therapeutic target in fibrogenic disorders. Am J Pathol. 2009;175:1362–70. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090393. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Wipff PJ, Rifkin DB, Meister JJ, Hinz B. Myofibroblast contraction activates latent TGF-beta1 from the extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:1311–23. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200704042. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 10
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 03 Jan 2008, Carol Otey 17 Jan 2008
42. Zhou Y, Hagood JS, Lu B, Merryman WD, Murphy-Ullrich JE. Thy-1-integrin alphavbeta5 interactions inhibit lung fibroblast contraction-induced latent TGF-beta1 activation and myofibroblast differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:22382–93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.126227. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Scotton CJ, Krupiczojc MA, Königshoff M, Mercer PF, Lee YC, Kaminski N, Morser J, Post JM, Maher TM, Nicholson AG, Moffatt JD, Laurent GJ, Derian CK, Eickelberg O, Chambers RC. Increased local expression of coagulation factor X contributes to the fibrotic response in human and murine lung injury. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2550–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] F1000 Factor 9
Evaluated by Moisés Selman 07 Oct 2009, Valder Arruda 28 Oct 2009
44. Asano Y, Ihn H, Yamane K, Jinnin M, Tamaki K. Increased expression of integrin alphavbeta5 induces the myofibroblastic differentiation of dermal fibroblasts. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:499–510. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.041306. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 28 Feb 2006
45. Bryant JE, Shamhart PE, Luther DJ, Olson ER, Koshy JC, Costic DJ, Mohile MV, Dockry M, Doane KJ, Meszaros JG. Cardiac myofibroblast differentiation is attenuated by alpha(3) integrin blockade: potential role in post-MI remodeling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;46:186–92. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.10.022. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 23 Jan 2009
46. Carracedo S, Lu N, Popova SN, Jonsson R, Eckes B, Gullberg D. The fibroblast integrin alpha11beta1 is induced in a mechanosensitive manner involving activin A and regulates myofibroblast differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:10434–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.078766. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Hinz B. Masters and servants of the force: The role of matrix adhesions in myofibroblast force perception and transmission. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006;85:175–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.09.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Chan MW, Chaudary F, Lee W, Copeland JW, McCulloch CA. Force-induced myofibroblast differentiation through collagen receptors is dependent on mammalian diaphanous (mDia) J Biol Chem. 2010;285:9273–81. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.075218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Goffin JM, Pittet P, Csucs G, Lussi JW, Meister JJ, Hinz B. Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of alpha-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:259–68. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200506179. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 8
Evaluated by Giulio Gabbiani 17 Jan 2006
50. Small EM, Thatcher JE, Sutherland LB, Kinoshita H, Gerard RD, Richardson JA, Dimaio JM, Sadek H, Kuwahara K, Olson EN. Myocardin-related transcription factor-A controls myofibroblast activation and fibrosis in response to myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2010;107:294–304. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Clement S, Hinz B, Dugina V, Gabbiani G, Chaponnier C. The N-terminal Ac-EEED sequence plays a role in alpha-smooth-muscle actin incorporation into stress fibers. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:1395–404. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01732. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Aarabi S, Bhatt KA, Shi Y, Paterno J, Chang EI, Loh SA, Holmes JW, Longaker MT, Yee H, Gurtner GC. Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis. FASEB J. 2007;21:3250–61. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8218com. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from F1000 Biology Reports are provided here courtesy of Faculty of 1000 Ltd