PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 1, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. 2010 SUMMER; 7(2): e87–e93.
doi:  10.1016/j.ddmec.2010.07.001
PMCID: PMC2998291
NIHMSID: NIHMS226560
Highly Specific Modulators of Protein Kinase C Localization: Applications to Heart Failure
Nir Qvit and Daria Mochly-Rosen*
Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford CA 94305-5174
Corresponding author: Mochly-Rosen, D., mochly/at/stanford.edu, Tel: 650-725-7720, Fax: (650) 723-4686
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) in which the blood supply does not match the body's needs, affects 10% of the population over 65 years old. The protein kinase C (PKC) family of kinases has a key role in normal and disease states. Here we discuss the role of PKC in HF and focus on the use of specific PKC regulators to identify the mechanism leading to this Pathology and potential leads for therapeutics.
Although there are many etiologies for heart failure (HF), they are all manifested as inability of the heart to deliver sufficient blood to the body. HF is a major cardiovascular disease. In 2008 were about 5 million people had HF, there were 300,000 HF-related deaths and the estimated costs for HF management were over $34 billion in the US alone. Current treatment is insufficient and multiple studies examining new targets to modulate the disease are underway. Here we focus on the signaling events regulated by protein kinase C (PKC). Notably, the levels of at least one PKC isozyme are highly elevated in failed human hearts [1], suggesting that it plays a role in this pathology (see in the following).
Protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes regulate multiple signaling events in normal and disease states. Initially identified by Nishizuka and coworkers more than 30 years ago [2], the highly homologous isozymes are divided into three categories, depending on their mode of activation: classical PKCs (cPKC) include α, βi, βii, and γ isoforms; novel PKCs (nPKC) include δ, ε, η, and θ isoforms; and atypical PKCs (aPKC) include ζ and ι/λ isoforms (Figure 1). nPKCs are activated by diacylglycerol (DAG) only, whereas the cPKCs are activated by DAG and Ca2+, and aPKCs are dependent on other lipid-derived second messengers [3]. Upon activation, PKC isozymes translocate from the soluble to the particulate cell fraction [4], including plasma membrane [5,6], nucleus [7], ER/Golgi [7,8] and mitochondria [9]. The PKC isozymes contain a highly conserved (C) regions separated by a number of variable (V) regions. The C-terminal half of PKC contains the catalytic region and the N-terminal half contains the regulatory domains, both regions are separated by a flexible hinge region (Figure 1). The homology in the catalytic region between various members of the PKC family is approximately 70%, whereas the homology in the regulatory domain is much more limited. The common C1 region in the regulatory domain binds second messengers and the C2 region mediates a number of inter- and intramolecular protein-protein interactions between individual PKC isozymes and their anchoring proteins, Receptors for Activated C Kinase (RACK) [10]. Binding of a specific activated PKC to its RACK provides access to and phosphorylation of their substrates (Figure 2i). Therefore, anchoring to RACKs is a required step for PKC function.
Figure 1
Figure 1
PKC isozymes and domains
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model of peptide regulators of protein-protein interactions between PKC isozymes and their anchoring proteins, RACKs
Relevant to heart disease, PKC isozymes play a key role in regulating cell proliferation [11-13], heart failure [14], heart attack [15], angiogenesis [16] and regulation of the immune response [17]. Academic researchers and the pharmaceutical industry identified the PKC family as an attractive target for therapeutic purposes. However, the majority of the available pharmacological agents acts on many protein kinases by targeting the conserved catalytic site and do not show sufficient selectivity for a specific PKC isozyme [18]. Many studies demonstrated that individual PKC isozymes have unique and even opposing roles, for example in the heart [19], and the vasculature [20], demonstrating the need for isozyme-selective regulators. Driven by the importance of identifying selective regulators for the various PKC isozymes, we set out to discover such specific PKC activators and inhibitors and apply them to different diseases such as HF. Our approach was to focus on regulating selective protein-protein interactions that govern PKC signaling using short peptides [13,21]. The first intra-molecular protein-protein interaction site that was identified is the pseudosubstrate site; it mediates binding of the regulatory domain to the catalytic domain thus maintaining PKC in an inactive conformation (Figure 2A; [3]). Other inter- and intra-molecular sites in PKC are described below.
Protein-protein interactions (PPI) play a pivotal role in the functional selectivity of enzymes participating in cellular signal transduction cascades. Peptides that regulate protein-protein interactions can be identified by screening large libraries, using systematic and random methodologies, or by rational approaches. The large screen approaches include: (Ia) Systematic search of large domain involved in protein-protein interactions: The systematic search is based on fine mapping of the interaction site within the protein-protein interaction domain and extensive screening of small fragments [22]. (Ib) Random search of large domain involved in protein-protein interactions: Random search uses random libraries consisting of many possible peptides of a certain length that are synthesized or expressed in virus and tested for their bioactivity [23]. (Ic) Search of key amino acid residues involved in protein-protein interactions: Performed by screening a library in which certain position in the peptides include specific amino acids, for example a phosphorylated tyrosine [24]. All of the above approaches were used successfully to identify peptides that modulate protein-protein interactions. However, these methods require the use of large libraries, up to billions of peptides, which are intensive and costly. Further, only limited use in biology was made with peptides discovered using these methods [25-27].
We developed simple rational approaches to identify short peptides (6-13 amino acids) that inhibit protein-protein interaction (Review [28]). These peptides were used by many laboratories for in vitro and in vivo testing of a variety of species including humans and resulted in over 250 publications. Several rational approaches for the design were used.
(IIa) Identification of sequences shared by non-related proteins that interact with a common protein
Some signaling enzymes interact with multiple unrelated proteins; short homologous sequences between these unrelated proteins could represent the binding site for the enzyme. Peptides that are derived from these sequences may regulate the protein-protein interaction and thereby regulate the enzyme function. For example, a short sequence of homology between two PKC-binding proteins, 14-3-3 and annexin I, was noted in a short note to Nature [29]. We suggested that this short homologous region in these two unrelated proteins might be the PKC-binding site and showed that a peptide based on that short sequence, peptide I, is a βPKC-specific translocation inhibitor (Figure 3a; [30,31]).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3a. Identification of sequences shared by non-related proteins that interact with a common protein. A sequence corresponding to the only homologous domain between two PKC-binding proteins: Annexin I (gi: 197692249; residues 332-346) and member (more ...)
(IIb) Identification of conserved sequences in homologous domains of otherwise non-related proteins
Conserved sequences within homologous domains of multiple signaling enzymes may be essential for a unique function. One example is the C2 domain, which is found in a large number of proteins. 3D structures of several C2 domains revealed their structure as a beta sandwich that is composed of four anti-parallel beta strands [69, 7377]. We showed that peptides derived from homologous sequences in the C2 domain of βPKC and synaptotagmin are effective βPKC inhibitors; βC2-1, βC2-2 and βC2-4, bind to RACK1, the specific RACK of βPKC, and inhibit the binding of βPKC to RACK1 and further signaling (Figure 3b;[32]).
(IIc) Identification of evolutionarily conserved sequences
Such conserved sequences in proteins from evolutionarily distant organisms are expected to serve the same function. For example, the homologous sequence in the εPKC C2 domain from Aplysia and Homo sapiens were the basis for the design of the ψεRACK peptide, an εPKC-specific agonist, and εV1-2 peptide, an εPKC-specific antagonist (Figure 3c; [33]).
(IId) Identification of sequences involved in intra-molecular interactions
Intra-molecular interactions within a variety of enzymes keep them inactive. Peptides that correspond to these sequences can serve as agonists, because they interfere with the inhibitory intramolecular interaction. For example, the βPKC agonist peptide corresponds to a six amino acid sequence of homology between βPKC and its RACK, RACK1. This sequence was chosen, in part, because it differs in one charged amino acid, suggesting that the affinity of the peptide from βPKC that mediates the intra-molecular interaction is not as good as that from the partner protein, RACK1; indeed, the PKC-derived peptide is an agonist, whereas the RACK1-derived peptide is an antagonist (Figure 3d;[34]).
βPKC has two alternatively spliced forms, βIPKC and βIIPKC, that vary only in their last 50 amino acids in the V5 region of the enzyme. Therefore, C2-derived peptides could not be used to selectively inhibit only one of the isozymes. However, short peptides derived from the V5 region were isozyme selective (Figure 3e;[32]).
Cell-Penetrating Peptides (CPP)
Are used to enable the delivery of a variety of cargoes, including other peptides across biological membranes. CPP are short, amphipathic, net positively charged peptides. Their penetration into cells is rapid and small cargos do not affect this rate. Some of the most common CPP are antennapedia43-58 homeodomain transcriptional factor from Drosophila and TAT47-57, derived from the transcription activating factor of the HIV. They can be conjugated to carrier using a permanent or a labile bond and they effectively deliver peptides even into the CNS (Review [35]).
Various PKC isozymes regulate cardiac hypertrophy, which may lead to left ventricle dilation and impaired cardiac function. αPKC was shown to be necessary and sufficient to induce cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in cell culture. Knock-out of αPKC protected mice from pressure overload-induced HF [36]. Dysfunction of remodeled myocytes obtained from rats with post-MI HF was improved by adding αPKC to permeabilized cells, suggesting a role for this isozyme in myocyte contractility [37]. However, αPKC levels in human patient samples with end-stage HF were found to be low compared with normal subjects [1], suggesting that αPKC may not be critical in HF, in humans.
There is a strong evidence for role for βPKC in HF in both model systems and in humans. Both βPKC isozymes are required for PMA-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in cell culture [32]. Yet in mice models, over-expression of βIIPKC leads to hypertrophy with myocardial dysfunction similar to HF [38,39] whereas, a knockout βPKC model demonstrates no role for βPKC in HF [40]. In rats with hypertension-induced HF, the levels of βPKC are elevated [41] and selective inhibition of βIIPKC by βIIV5-3, the selective peptide inhibitor of βIIPKC [32], improves cardiac function and prolongs survival of the rats (Figure 3e, Table 1;[32]). Samples of human hearts with HF show, in two independent studies, a major increase in activation and level of βPKC [1,14].
Table 1
Table 1
PKC-derived peptides and their application in HF
A potential role of εPKC has also been described. Mice that express the εV1 domain, the εPKC-selective translocation inhibitor, developed from birth dilated eccentric cardiomyopathy and HF, whereas, transgenic mice expressing ψεRACK, the specific peptide activator of εPKC, had normal cardiac function, suggesting that εPKC activation may cause hyperplasia and its signaling may be part of a compensatory pro-proliferative pathway, at least during early postnatal development (Table 1;[42]). These early developmental roles of εPKC related to its role in pathological remodeling was tested in rat models of HF. Sustained inhibition of εPKC using εV1-2, the specific peptide inhibitor of εPKC [43], prolonged rat survival, reduced hypertrophy and corrected cardiac dysfunction (Table 1;[41,44]). The opposing role of εPKC in these two studies can be explained by species differences or because the mouse model of post-natal expression does not recapitulate the human disease.
With pathological stressors such as ischemia and hypertension, fibroblasts are known to migrate to the injury site leading to the accumulation of collagen, causing an excess of cardiac fibrosis, which interferes with myocardial metabolism and decreases cardiac elasticity. A number of PKC isozymes that are present in cardiac fibroblasts were shown to control the deposition of collagen. Both δPKC and ζPKC isozymes are activated during TGFβ-induced fibroblast proliferation. However, while, δPKC selective inhibition increased TGF-β1-induced proliferation of cardiac fibroblast, a selective inhibitor of δPKC blocked TGF-β1-induced cardiac fibroblast proliferation (Table 1;[13]). εPKC regulates the adhesion and migration of cardiac fibroblasts as a result of Ang II treatment and fibroblast and cardiac myofibroblasts from εPKC knockout mice show impaired adhesion and migration [45]. HF in hypertensive rats treated with the εPKC selective inhibitor is associated with inhibition of increased interstitial fibrosis (Table 1;[46]). All of the above data corroborate the important role of different PKC isozymes in cardiac fibrosis.
An increase in inflammatory cells in the myocardium participates in the pathogenesis of HF. Selective inhibition of εPKC with εV1-2 causes infiltration of inflammatory cells into the myocardium in the hypertension-induced HF model in rats (Table 1;[44]). The inhibition of εPKC isozyme was also associated with a decreased degranulation of cardiac mast cells, which resulted in inhibition of the pro-inflammatory, pro-hypertrophic, and pro-fibrotic mast cells effects. Therefore, dysregulation of PKC in inflammatory cells and in cardiac mast cells may contribute to the development of HF.
The evidence for a role for PKC in HF is substantial. However, because PKC isozymes have different and sometimes opposing effects, studies that use non-selective pharmacological tools may be inconclusive. Further, studies that rely on genetic manipulation of PKC cannot distinguish between the role the enzymes play during development and those that are critical for the etiology of HF. A special issue may relate to the study of HF in mice, as an emerging body of work demonstrates that mouse models are not as predictive of human disease as models in rats [47]. Regardless of these limitations, PKC plays a pivotal role in HF with strong evidence for a negative role for a member of the classical PKC isozymes, likely βIIPKC and for the novel isozyme, εPKC.
We have described here the use of regulators of protein-protein interactions as pharmacological tools in the study of HF. Although traditionally, protein-protein interactions were thought to be difficult to regulate with pharmacological agents, we showed that peptides derived from the interaction surfaces provide superb pharmacological tools to regulate PKC-mediated signaling. Based on rational design approaches, we developed isozyme-specific inhibitors and activators that helped us identify the role of different PKC isozymes in HF. Some of these peptides were already shown to be safe in humans when used acutely [48], and animal studies suggest that they are safe also when delivered in a sustained manner. Whether peptide regulators will be useful in the treatment of HF remains to be determined, but the above studies illustrate that specific PKC isozymes may serve as specific targets for future drug development for HF.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Marie-Helene Disatnik for helpful discussions and Dr. Suresh Palaniyandi for consultation in this studies; the work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants NIH AA11147, HL52141 and HL76670 to D.M.-R.
Footnotes
Disclaimer statement: D.M.-R. is the founder of KAI Pharmaceuticals, a company that uses PKC regulators in the clinic. However, none of the work in her lab is supported by the company.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1. Simonis G, et al. Protein kinase C in the human heart: differential regulation of the isoforms in aortic stenosis or dilated cardiomyopathy. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2007;305(1-2):103–111. [PubMed]
2. Takai Y, et al. Studies on a cyclic nucleotide-independent protein kinase and its proenzyme in mammalian tissues. I. Purification and characterization of an active enzyme from bovine cerebellum. J Biol Chem. 1977;252(21):7603–7609. [PubMed]
3. Churchill EN, et al. Rationally designed peptide regulators of protein kinase C. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009;20(1):25–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Kraft AS, et al. Decrease in cytosolic calcium/phospholipid-dependent protein kinase activity following phorbol ester treatment of EL4 thymoma cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1982;257(22):13193–13196. [PubMed]
5. Kraft AS, Anderson WB. Phorbol esters increase the amount of Ca2+, phospholipid-dependent protein kinase associated with plasma membrane. Nature. 1983;301(5901):621–623. [PubMed]
6. Gopalakrishna R, et al. Factors influencing chelator-stable, detergent-extractable, phorbol diester-induced membrane association of protein kinase C. Differences between Ca2+-induced and phorbol ester-stabilized membrane bindings of protein kinase C. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1986;261(35):16438–16445. [PubMed]
7. Disatnik MH, et al. Localization of protein kinase C isozymes in cardiac myocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1994;210(2):287–297. [PubMed]
8. Qi X, Mochly-Rosen D. The PKCdelta -Abl complex communicates ER stress to the mitochondria - an essential step in subsequent apoptosis. Journal of Cell Science. 2008;121(Pt 6):804–813. [PubMed]
9. Churchill EN, et al. Reperfusion-induced translocation of deltaPKC to cardiac mitochondria prevents pyruvate dehydrogenase reactivation. Circ Res. 2005;97(1):78–85. [PubMed]
10. Ron D, et al. C2 region-derived peptides inhibit translocation and function of beta protein kinase C in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(41):24180–24187. [PubMed]
11. Li W, et al. Protein kinase C-delta is an important signaling molecule in insulin-like growth factor I receptor-mediated cell transformation. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1998;18(10):5888–5898. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Kiley SC, et al. Increased protein kinase C delta in mammary tumor cells: relationship to transformtion and metastatic progression. Oncogene. 1999;18(48):6748–6757. [PubMed]
13. Braun MU, Mochly-Rosen D. Opposing effects of delta- and zeta-protein kinase C isozymes on cardiac fibroblast proliferation: use of isozyme-selective inhibitors. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2003;35(8):895–903. [PubMed]
14. Bowling N, et al. Increased protein kinase C activity and expression of Ca2+-sensitive isoforms in the failing human heart. Circulation. 1999;99(3):384–391. [PubMed]
15. Inagaki K, et al. Additive protection of the ischemic heart ex vivo by combined treatment with delta-protein kinase C inhibitor and epsilon-protein kinase C activator. Circulation. 2003;108(7):869–875. [PubMed]
16. Teicher BA, et al. Antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of a protein kinase Cbeta inhibitor in human breast cancer and ovarian cancer xenografts. Investigational New Drugs. 2002;20(3):241–251. [PubMed]
17. Isakov N, Altman A. Protein kinase C(theta) in T cell activation. Annual Review of Immunology. 2002;20:761–794. [PubMed]
18. Mackay HJ, Twelves CJ. Protein kinase C: a target for anticancer drugs? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2003;10(3):389–396. [PubMed]
19. Churchill EN, Mochly-Rosen D. The roles of PKCdelta and epsilon isoenzymes in the regulation of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(Pt 5):1040–1042. [PubMed]
20. Churchill E, et al. PKC isozymes in chronic cardiac disease: possible therapeutic targets? Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:569–599. [PubMed]
21. Brandman R, et al. Peptides derived from the C2 domain of protein kinase C epsilon (epsilon PKC) modulate epsilon PKC activity and identify potential protein-protein interaction surfaces. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(6):4113–4123. [PubMed]
22. Pitcher JA, et al. Role of beta gamma subunits of G proteins in targeting the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase to membrane-bound receptors. Science. 1992;257(5074):1264–1267. [PubMed]
23. Wu J, et al. Identifying substrate motifs of protein kinases by a random library approach. Biochemistry. 1994;33(49):14825–14833. [PubMed]
24. Fantl WJ, et al. Distinct phosphotyrosines on a growth factor receptor bind to specific molecules that mediate different signaling pathways. Cell. 1992;69(3):413–423. [PubMed]
25. Songyang Z, et al. Recognition of unique carboxyl-terminal motifs by distinct PDZ domains. Science. 1997;275(5296):73–77. [PubMed]
26. Grabs D, et al. The SH3 domain of amphiphysin binds the proline-rich domain of dynamin at a single site that defines a new SH3 binding consensus sequence. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997;272(20):13419–13425. [PubMed]
27. Nishikawa K, et al. Determination of the specific substrate sequence motifs of protein kinase C isozymes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(2):952–960. [PubMed]
28. Souroujon MC, Mochly-Rosen D. Peptide modulators of protein-protein interactions in intracellular signaling. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16(10):919–924. [PubMed]
29. Aitken A, et al. Kinase and neurotransmitters. Nature. 1990;344(6267):594. [PubMed]
30. Mochly-Rosen D, et al. Identification of intracellular receptor proteins for activated protein kinase C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(9):3997–4000. [PubMed]
31. Ron D, Mochly-Rosen D. Agonists and antagonists of protein kinase C function, derived from its binding proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1994;269(34):21395–21398. [PubMed]
32. Stebbins EG, Mochly-Rosen D. Binding Specificity for RACK1 Resides in the V5 Region of beta II Protein Kinase C. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(32):29644–29650. [PubMed]
33. Dorn GW, II, et al. Sustained in vivo cardiac protection by a rationally designed peptide that causes varepsilon protein kinase C translocation. PNAS. 1999;96(22):12798–12803. [PubMed]
34. Ron D, Mochly-Rosen D. An Autoregulatory Region in Protein-Kinase-C - the Pseudoanchoring Site. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92(2):492–496. [PubMed]
35. Fischer PM. Cellular uptake mechanisms and potential therapeutic utility of peptidic cell delivery vectors: progress 2001-2006. Med Res Rev. 2007;27(6):755–795. [PubMed]
36. Braz JC, et al. PKC-alpha regulates cardiac contractility and propensity toward heart failure. Nature Medicine. 2004;10(3):248–254. [PubMed]
37. Belin RJ, et al. Augmented protein kinase C-alpha-induced myofilament protein phosphorylation contributes to myofilament dysfunction in experimental congestive heart failure. Circulation Research. 2007;101(2):195–204. [PubMed]
38. Wakasaki H, et al. Targeted overexpression of protein kinase C beta2 isoform in myocardium causes cardiomyopathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(17):9320–9325. [PubMed]
39. Bowman JC, et al. Expression of protein kinase C beta in the heart causes hypertrophy in adult mice and sudden death in neonates. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1997;100(9):2189–2195. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Roman BB, et al. PKC-beta is not necessary for cardiac hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280(5):H2264–2270. [PubMed]
41. Inagaki K, et al. Tissue angiotensin II during progression or ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure in hypertensive rats; differential effects on PKC epsilon and PKC beta. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2002;34(10):1377–1385. [PubMed]
42. Mochly-Rosen D, et al. Cardiotrophic effects of protein kinase C epsilon: analysis by in vivo modulation of PKCepsilon translocation. Circulation Research. 2000;86(11):1173–1179. [PubMed]
43. Johnson JA, et al. A protein kinase C translocation inhibitor as an isozyme-selective antagonist of cardiac function. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(40):24962–24966. [PubMed]
44. Palaniyandi SS, et al. Mast cells and epsilonPKC: a role in cardiac remodeling in hypertension-induced heart failure. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2008;45(6):779–786. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Stawowy P, et al. Protein kinase C epsilon mediates angiotensin II-induced activation of beta1-integrins in cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovascular Research. 2005;67(1):50–59. [PubMed]
46. Inagaki K, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of epsilon-protein kinase C attenuates cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction in hypertension-induced heart failure. Hypertension. 2008;51(6):1565–1569. [PubMed]
47. Liao BY, Zhang J. Null mutations in human and mouse orthologs frequently result in different phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(19):6987–6992. [PubMed]
48. Bates E, et al. Intracoronary KAI-9803 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;117(7):886–896. [PubMed]
49. Tanaka M, et al. Inhibition of heart transplant injury and graft coronary artery disease after prolonged organ ischemia by selective protein kinase C regulators. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(5):1160–1167. [PubMed]
50. Koyanagi T, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of epsilon PKC suppresses chronic inflammation in murine cardiac transplantation model. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007;43(4):517–522. [PubMed]
69. Banci L, et al. Molecular dynamics characterization of the C2 domain of protein kinase Cbeta. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(15):12988–12997. [PubMed]
73. Rizo J, Sudhof TC. C2-domains, structure and function of a universal Ca2+-binding domain. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(26):15879–15882. [PubMed]
74. Sutton RB, Sprang SR. Structure of the protein kinase Cbeta phospholipid-binding C2 domain complexed with Ca2+ Structure. 1998;6(11):1395–1405. [PubMed]
75. Pappa H, et al. rystal structure of the C2 domain from protein kinase C-delta. Structure. 1998;6(7):885–894. [PubMed]
76. Nalefski EA, et al. C2 domains from different Ca2+ signaling pathways display functional and mechanistic diversity. Biochemistry. 2001;40(10):3089–3100. [PubMed]
77. Ochoa WF, et al. Structure of the C2 domain from novel protein kinase Cepsilon. A membrane binding model for Ca(2+)-independent C2 domains. J Mol Biol. 2001;311(4):837–849. [PubMed]