PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Magn Reson Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 6.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2997615
NIHMSID: NIHMS40539

Development and Initial Evaluation of 7 Tesla Q-Ball Imaging of the Human Brain

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) noninvasively depicts white matter connectivity in regions where the Gaussian model of diffusion is valid, but yields inaccurate results where diffusion has a more complex distribution, such as fiber crossings. Q-ball imaging (QBI) overcomes this limitation of DTI by more fully characterizing the angular dependence of intravoxel diffusion with larger numbers of diffusion-encoding directional measurements at higher diffusion-weighting factors (b values). However, the former results in longer acquisition times and the latter results in lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this project, we developed specialized 7 Tesla acquisition methods utilizing novel radiofrequency pulses, 8-channel parallel imaging EPI, and high-order shimming with a phase-sensitive multichannel B0 field map reconstruction. These methods were applied in initial healthy adult volunteer studies which demonstrated the feasibility of performing 7T QBI. Preliminary comparisons of 3T with 7T within supratentorial crossing white matter tracts document a 79.5% SNR increase for b=3000 s/mm2 (p=0.0001), and a 38.6% SNR increase for b=6000 s/mm2 (p=0.015). Using spherical harmonic reconstruction of the q-ball orientation distribution function at b=3000 s/mm2, 7T QBI allowed accurate visualization of crossing fiber tracts with fewer diffusion-encoding acquisitions than at 3T. The improvement of 7T QBI at b factors as high as 6000 s/mm2 resulted in better angular resolution than 3T for depicting fibers crossing at shallow angles. Although the increased susceptibility effects at 7T caused problematic distortions near brain-air interfaces at the skull base and posterior fossa, these initial 7T QBI studies demonstrated excellent quality in much of the supratentorial brain with significant improvements as compared to 3T acquisitions in the same individuals.

Keywords: Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), High Field MRI, Fiber Tractography, High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI), q-ball Imaging (QBI), White Matter

INTRODUCTION

There has been continuous progress in magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion imaging technology over the past two decades, revolutionizing scientific studies of the human central nervous system and the clinical practice of neuroradiology. However, despite the development of higher performance gradient systems, multi-element phased array coils and parallel imaging, as well as the latest generation of clinical 3 Tesla (3T) high field scanners, diffusion MR imaging of the human brain in vivo has remained limited by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) constraints. This is because the progression of new applications for diffusion imaging has created ever increasing demands for spatial resolution and angular resolution. Much recent interest has focused on diffusion tensor imaging [1, 2] and its use in the noninvasive investigation of white matter connectivity with fiber tractography [35], which requires high resolution in three spatial dimensions. Moreover, the shortcomings of DTI for accurately characterizing diffusion in complex white matter, where fiber tracts with different orientations intersect or are otherwise partial volume averaged within a voxel, has led to the advent of high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI). HARDI methods attempt to recover more information about the angular structure of intravoxel diffusion by acquiring larger numbers of diffusion-encoding directional measurements at higher diffusion-weighting factors (b values) than is routine for DTI [68]. There has been a growing list of proposed techniques for reconstructing fiber orientations from HARDI data, including spherical harmonic modeling of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) profile [7, 8], multitensor modeling [9], generalized tensor representations [10, 11], persistent angular structure [12], circular spectrum mapping [13], q-ball imaging [14, 15], spherical deconvolution [16], fiber orientation estimated on continuous axially symmetric tensors [17] and the diffusion orientation transform [18]. However, all of these HARDI approaches remain SNR-limited even on 3T scanners with parallel imaging capability, because of the need for both high spatial resolution and very strong diffusion-weighting, resulting in long examination times and/or suboptimal discrimination of intravoxel crossing fiber tracts. Indeed, the low SNR of HARDI at 3T has motivated the introduction of different forms of regularization to improve the reliability of fiber orientation determination [1921]. Proposed methods for more fully sampling q-space often require even higher diffusion-weighting factors than is typical for HARDI [2224]; hence, these techniques might derive even greater benefits from better SNR.

The most straightforward strategy for improving SNR is to boost the magnetic field strength B0, thereby increasing proton spin polarization. However, to our knowledge, there have not yet been any reports in the peer-reviewed literature of diffusion imaging of the living human brain at field strengths greater than 3T. Challenges to diffusion-weighted imaging at ultra-high field include T2 and T2* shortening, large chemical shifts, poorer field homogeneity, and increased susceptibility artifacts. The goal of this project was to develop specialized 7 Tesla single-shot spin EPI q-ball acquisition methods and investigate feasibility and performance in initial human studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Image Acquisition

HARDI was performed on three healthy adult male volunteers, ages 26, 36 and 38 years, using a 3T Signa EXCITE scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) equipped with a commercial 8-channel phased array head receive coil (MRI Devices, Waukesha, WI). The volunteers also underwent HARDI on a 7T MR scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) equipped with a 30-cm volume excite coil and 8-channel phased array receiver (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA). The imaging protocols were approved by the institutional review board at our medical center, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. At both 3T and 7T, a multislice axial single-shot echoplanar spin-echo pulse sequence was employed for high angular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging. The 7T version of the sequence incorporated a custom-designed high-bandwidth fat saturation pulse for effective lipid suppression. Automated high-order shimming was performed prior to the diffusion-weighted acquisitions using a specialized multichannel B0 field map reconstruction that preserves phase information when combining signals from the different phased array coil elements [25]. Both the 3T and the 7T scanners were equipped with gradient coil sets that have maximum amplitudes of 40 mT/m and maximum slew rates of 150 T/m/s. At each field strength, conventional Stejskal-Tanner diffusion encoding was applied in each of two HARDI protocols, one with 36 diffusion directional measurements at b=3000 s·mm−2 (TR=5s; TE=89ms, NEX=1) and the other with 131 diffusion directional measurements at b=6000 s·mm−2 (TR=6s; TE=108ms, NEX=1). For both protocols, an additional acquisition without diffusion weighting at b=0 s·mm−2 was also obtained. Total scan time was 6 minutes 30 seconds for the 36-direction experiment and 26 minutes 40 seconds for the 131-direction experiment. For SNR calculation at 3T and at 7T, two identical 6-direction acquisitions were performed at b=3000 s·mm−2 and also at b=6000 s·mm−2 using the same sequence parameters as described above for the two HARDI protocols. In all cases, the diffusion-encoding directions were distributed uniformly over the surface of a sphere using electrostatic repulsion [26]. Parallel imaging of the diffusion-weighted data acquired with the 8-channel phased array head coils at 3T and at 7T was accomplished using the Array Spatial Sensitivity Encoding Technique (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with an acceleration factor of 2. For all acquisitions, spatial resolution was 2 mm in all 3 dimensions (FOV 256×256 mm, 128×128 matrix, 2-mm thick interleaved slices with no gap). For all acquisitions, the supratentorial brain from the vertex to below the level of the corpus callosum was covered with axial slices oriented along the plane passing through the anterior and posterior commissures.

Image Postprocessing

Tensor analysis of the HARDI datasets was performed in DtiStudio v2.4 [27], including generation of color fractional anisotropy (FA) maps using the standard red-blue-green directional encoding convention. The q-ball ODF at each voxel was computed from the HARDI data using spherical harmonic basis functions, using methods we have described in detail previously [19]. Truncating the spherical harmonic series at a low order enables q-ball ODF reconstruction from relatively few diffusion-encoding directional measurements with little noise amplification, but achieving higher angular resolution with larger numbers of directional measurements requires higher harmonic orders in the reconstruction. The penalty of including higher harmonic orders is greater noise amplification. Hence, in the fast acquisition regime at b=3000 s·mm−2 with only 36 directions, a maximum harmonic order of 4 was used for ODF reconstruction. For the high angular resolution regime at b=6000 s·mm−2 with 131 directions, a maximum harmonic order of 8 was employed.

Because of the low SNR at b=6000 s·mm−2 and the greater noise amplification inherent at higher harmonic orders, linear regularization using Damped Singular Value Decomposition – Generalized Cross Validation [21] was applied in the estimation of the q-ball ODFs to improve the reliability of fiber orientation estimation and suppress spurious peaks. As an alternative to harmonic q-ball reconstruction in the high angular resolution regime at b=6000 s·mm−2, the original linear matrix implementation of QBI using radial basis functions [15] was also used to reconstruct the q-ball ODFs. In selecting the radial basis function (RBF) parameters, we used a spherical Gaussian kernel with width parameter σi, calculated to minimize the log condition number of the RBF interpolation matrix. The number of equator points was k = 48. For both harmonic q-ball and RBF q-ball methods, values of the ODF were computed at locations corresponding to the 642 vertices of an 8-fold tessellated icosahedron. A spherical Gaussian smoothing kernel was applied to the RBF reconstructions, where the width of the kernel σs was chosen visually to smooth out fluctuations in the ODF [15]. RBF q-ball reconstruction performs less reliably at low spherical sampling densities [19] and therefore was not attempted in the fast acquisition regime at b=3000 s·mm−2.

To facilitate interpretation of the q-ball ODF results, anisotropy was emphasized by min-max normalization. For display, points corresponding to the desired azimuth and elevation were plotted as a three-dimensional surface. Points on the surface of the ODF were color-coded by direction according to the standard red (left-right), blue (superoinferior) and green (anteroposterior) convention used to represent the direction of the principal eigenvector in DTI. As the normalization step can make relatively isotropic ODFs appear anisotropic, the surfaces are overlaid onto a grayscale background corresponding to the generalized fractional anisotropy (GFA) within each voxel for visualization of the human subject data [15]. The more anisotropic ODFs thus appear superimposed on brighter backgrounds, and the background appears dark in voxels with low GFA. All q-ball analysis was performed using custom software written in MATLAB version 7.0 (MathWorks, Natick, MA).

Since there is a spatially nonuniform distribution of noise in parallel imaging, as applied to our HARDI acquisitions, the effective SNR of the diffusion-weighted images at each field strength and at each b value was calculated using the difference method of Reeder et al. [28] from two separate 6-direction DWI acquisitions using identical experimental parameters.

RESULTS

HARDI was successfully performed in all three volunteers at both field strengths and for both diffusion-weighting factors at each field strength. Figure 1 shows examples for 3T and 7T of directionally-encoded color FA maps from tensor analysis of all 36 diffusion-encoding directional measurements at b=3000 s·mm−2 from one volunteer for a single axial slice location at the level of the body of the corpus callosum. In this fast acquisition regime, visual inspection of the color FA maps clearly manifests the greater SNR of 7T compared to 3T. As demonstrated in Figure 2, the superior SNR at 7T allowed accurate reconstruction of q-ball ODFs from as few as 36 diffusion directional measurements, depicting the known anatomy of crossing fiber tracts in this region of supratentorial white matter. These intersecting axonal pathways consist of the commissural fibers of the corpus callosum (CC), association fibers of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), and projection fibers of the corticospinal tract (CS). In contradistinction, the lower SNR at 3T yielded poorer visualization of this complex white matter architecture with QBI using such a small number of diffusion-encoding directions.

Figure 1
3T versus 7T diffusion tensor imaging with 36 diffusion-encoding directions at b=3000 s·mm−2
Figure 2
3T versus 7T q-ball imaging of crossing supratentorial fiber tracts with 36 diffusion-encoding directions at b=3000 s·mm−2, using spherical harmonic reconstruction

For each of the three volunteers, the SNR was calculated as described in the Methods from two identical 6-direction DWI acquisitions at b=3000 s·mm−2 and 2-mm isotropic spatial resolution. The SNR results are presented in Table 1 for the region of crossing fiber tracts depicted by the q-ball ODFs of Figure 2. Averaged across the 3 volunteers, the SNR of DWI at b=3000 s·mm−2 was found to be 79.5% higher for the 7T data compared to that acquired at 3T. This was a statistically significant difference (p=0.0001).

Table 1
Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at b=3000 s·mm−2 for 3T vs 7T

In the high angular resolution regime at b=6000 s·mm−2 with 131 diffusion-encoding directions, the SNR gain at 7T over 3T was again apparent in the directionally-encoded color FA maps from tensor analysis of the HARDI data (Figure 3) and from the q-ball ODFs in a region of complex white matter architecture (Figure 4). For QBI in particular, intravoxel fiber crossings at shallow angles are better visualized at 7T than at 3T. The higher noise levels at 3T produced many more spurious peaks in the ODFs than at 7T. This was true even with the use of DSVD-GCV regularization to improve the numerical conditioning of the harmonic q-ball ODF reconstruction in the setting of low SNR. Similar to the results with harmonic basis elements, the superiority of 7T over 3T was also apparent when ODFs were reconstructed using radial basis functions (Figure 5).

Figure 3
3T versus 7T DTI with 131 diffusion-encoding directions at b=6000 s·mm−2
Figure 4
3T versus 7T q-ball imaging of crossing supratentorial fiber tracts with 131 diffusion-encoding directions at b=6000 s·mm−2, using spherical harmonic reconstruction with regularization
Figure 5
3T versus 7T q-ball imaging of crossing supratentorial fiber tracts with 131 diffusion-encoding directions at b=6000 s·mm−2, using radial basis function (RBF) reconstruction

For each of the three volunteers, the SNR was calculated from two identical 6-direction DWI acquisitions at b=6000 s·mm−2 and 2-mm isotropic spatial resolution, and the results are tabulated in Table 2. In the region of crossing fiber tracts depicted by the q-ball ODFs of Figures 45, the SNR of DWI at b=6000 s·mm−2 was found to be 38.6% higher for 7T compared to 3T. This was a statistically significant difference (p=0.015).

Table 2
Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at b=6000 s·mm−2 for 3T vs 7T

DISCUSSION

The burgeoning number of HARDI techniques that have recently been described for reconstructing multiple intravoxel fiber orientations attests to the great interest in overcoming the limitations of DTI in this regard. Of these HARDI methods, q-ball imaging in particular has proven robust in studies by multiple groups [14, 15, 17, 19] and has been validated with both simulations and phantom experiments [29, 30]. For visualizing the complex white matter anatomy of the human brain in vivo, high spatial resolution, high angular resolution, and high SNR of the diffusion-weighted data need to be achieved simultaneously. However, the strong diffusion-weighting required for high angular resolution reduces SNR dramatically. Isotropic voxel dimensions are desirable to avoid biasing anisotropy determinations along a particular axis; however, reducing voxel size along all 3 dimensions to achieve higher spatial resolution also severely reduces SNR. Therefore, 3T MR scanners with high-performance gradient systems have been the platform of choice for performing HARDI, including q-ball imaging. Nevertheless, HARDI on 3T systems remains SNR-limited, which has led to the development of different types of regularization to improve the performance of fiber orientation estimation under low SNR conditions. These include Tikhonov regularization [19], minimization of negative peaks [20], and, most recently, Damped Singular Value Decomposition – Generalized Cross Validation [21]. These regularization methods have previously been applied to q-ball imaging [19] and to spherical deconvolution [20, 21].

Hence, there is clearly a need for the superior SNR of HARDI at ultra-high field. In this study, we have demonstrated the feasibility of performing 7T HARDI using a specialized 7T single-shot spin echo echoplanar pulse sequence with parallel imaging. These initial human results also show a significant boost at 7T in SNR over that of an equivalent acquisition at 3T. To our knowledge, this is the first report of 7T diffusion-weighted imaging of the human brain in vivo. Single-shot spin echo EPI (ssSE-EPI) is by far the most widely used DWI technique because of its efficiency in terms of SNR per unit time and because of its relatively low motion sensitivity. However, there are several technical challenges to performing ssSE-EPI at 7T. A primary concern is the more rapid T2* decay at higher field, which increases T2* blurring, reduces SNR, and increases off-resonance phase errors that contribute to worse EPI image distortion. To a lesser extent, T2 shortening at ultra-high field can also reduce SNR and worsen T2 blurring. These considerations reduce the anticipated SNR gain at 7T, which otherwise would be expected to scale more than linearly with field strength [31]. However, the adverse effects of T2 and T2* shortening can be mitigated by parallel imaging, which shortens the EPI echo train and allows for smaller echo times [32, 33]. We found that using ASSET parallel imaging in conjunction with an 8-channel phased array head coil yielded 7T diffusion-weighted images comparable to 3T in terms of image distortion in the supratentorial brain, while preserving much of the SNR increase that would be expected at 7T compared to 3T. The smaller SNR improvement of 7T over 3T that we documented at b=6000 s·mm−2 compared to b=3000 s·mm−2 may at least in part be due to greater T2* decay for 7T compared to 3T at the longer TE needed to achieve stronger diffusion-weighting, and also possibly due to differences in the hardware (coils, gradients, receive-chain, transmit uniformity, etc) between the GE 3T and 7T MR systems. The advent of phased array head coils with 16, 32, or even greater numbers of receiver elements should enable the use of larger parallel imaging reduction factors, which would further reduce the EPI echo train and the TE, thereby increasing the utility of ssSE-EPI for DWI applications. It is noteworthy that 7T has an inherent advantage over lower field strengths in this regime of highly parallel imaging, because the shorter resonance wavelength allows better radiofrequency energy focusing. In this manner, larger reduction factors can theoretically be achieved without as much loss of SNR at 7T as at 3T [3436].

Another challenge in implementing ssSE-EPI at 7T is the larger chemical shift at ultra-high field, which hinders adequate lipid suppression. We found that incorporating a custom-designed high-bandwidth frequency-selective fat saturation pulse effectively dealt with this issue. The problem of increased sensitivity of ssSE-EPI to B0 inhomogeneity at 7T was addressed in this study with high-order shimming using a phase-sensitive B0 field map reconstruction that can be used with multichannel phased array coils [25]. Moreover, the use of parallel imaging reduces ssSE-EPI image distortions related to inhomogeneity effects [32, 33]. These solutions proved adequate in the supratentorial brain, producing image distortions that were no worse than at 3T. However, at the air-tissue interfaces of the skull base and the posterior fossa, image warping at 7T was considerably worse than at 3T, limiting the usefulness of 7T for these more inferior brain regions. As with the problem of shorter T2* relaxation times at ultra-high field, the use of highly parallel imaging with larger reduction factors may mitigate this current drawback of ssSE-EPI DWI at 7T. Another potential solution might be to use the reversed gradient diffusion imaging technique [37]. Other approaches with less sensitivity to B0 inhomogeneity include multi-shot EPI or single-shot and multi-shot fast spin echo based approaches such as PROPELLER [38]. However, current weaknesses of these pulse sequences at ultra-high field include motion sensitivity, low SNR compared to ssSE-EPI, longer imaging times, and specific absorption rates exceeding FDA guidelines. Recently developed methods that are particularly promising for high field DWI include PROPELLER-EPI [39] and single-shot STEAM [40], the latter of which has recently been applied to 7T DTI of the mouse brain in vivo [41]. As with ssSE-EPI, some of the drawbacks of these alternative sequences at high field might also be solved by highly parallel imaging, as has been shown for PROPELLER-EPI [42].

In this pilot investigation, we present preliminary data showing how the additional SNR of DWI at ultra-high field can be used to benefit HARDI in two different ways: for faster scanning and for higher angular resolution, both without sacrificing spatial resolution. The SNR at the spatial resolution of 2-mm isotropic voxels used in our work compares favorably to that of recent 3T HARDI studies [14, 19, 21]; hence the effect of Rician noise distribution at low SNR on ODF estimation should be comparable in this study to prior q-ball imaging studies of the living human brain. In the fast acquisition regime at b=3000 s·mm−2, multiple intravoxel fiber orientations in the supratentorial white matter are better visualized from q-ball ODFs at 7T than at 3T when using only 36 diffusion-encoding measurements. We have previously shown that spherical harmonic basis functions are useful for q-ball ODF reconstruction under sparse spherical sampling conditions, allowing accurate visualization of complex white matter architecture from as few as 55 diffusion-encoding directions at 3T with b=3000 s·mm−2 and 2-mm voxel resolution [19]. The current results illustrate that higher SNR allows accurate fitting of a low-order harmonic model from even fewer measurements at 7T, further reducing whole-brain imaging time to 10 minutes or less. This is important for routine application to clinical patient populations. The sparse spherical sampling necessarily sacrifices angular resolution, and the relatively low b factor and the low harmonic order are tailored for ODF reconstruction in this fast scanning regime. However, as illustrated in Figure 2, important details of the crossing fiber tract anatomy can still be discerned under these experimental conditions.

We focused on the supratentorial crossing tracts that include the corticospinal tract, corpus callosum, and superior longitudinal fasciculus because this is the best studied region in prior HARDI reports [15, 16, 19]. A comprehensive quantitative comparison of 3T and 7T q-ball imaging throughout multiple brain regions is beyond the scope of this pilot study. Such an investigation would need to account for differences in B1 homogeneity between the two field strengths, as B1 non-uniformity would be expected to be more pronounced at 7T than 3T; hence, more subjects would be required for a statistically valid comparison. A promising approach in future studies to addressing the greater B1 inhomogeneity at 7T is the use of parallel radiofrequency transmission [4345].

Although we show results herein only for q-ball imaging, the SNR advantage of 7T should also benefit other HARDI and q-space reconstruction methods. For scientific research requiring higher angular resolution, the superior SNR at 7T enables the use of stronger-diffusion-weighting without the need to reduce spatial resolution by using larger voxels, as exemplified by Figure 4. Although the use of regularization techniques such as DSVD-GCV can improve ODF reconstruction in the setting of low SNR, 7T still retains an advantage over 3T (Figure 4). It is theoretically possible to gain additional SNR at 3T simply by simply scanning longer; however, this entails some practical difficulties in the case of HARDI at very high b values. The most significant is the problem of motion correction for very lengthy acquisitions, even in normal volunteers. The low SNR of each diffusion-weighted measurement, the absence of consistent anatomical landmarks in the DWI images, and the variable signal intensities within white matter across different diffusion-encoding directions all combine to confound current motion correction algorithms. Other strategies to improve the SNR of 3T HARDI include higher performance gradient systems and higher density multi-element phased array receiver coils. With regard to the former, current whole-body gradient systems are already reaching the limits of gradient amplitude and slew rate imposed by the need to avoid peripheral nerve stimulation. Higher density phased array head coils may indeed have an impact on 3T HARDI; however, the electrodynamic advantages of the higher resonance frequency at ultra-high field [3436] mean that they will likely provide an even greater benefit for 7T HARDI.

In summary, ultra-high field MR imaging shows great promise for in vivo investigation of human white matter architecture and connectivity using HARDI techniques such as q-ball imaging, both in scientific studies of normal volunteers and in clinical research on patient populations. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of diffusion imaging of the living human brain at field strengths greater than 3T. Preliminary volunteer studies showed significant SNR improvement over 3T for 7T HARDI of supratentorial crossing fiber tracts using ssSE-EPI with high-order shimming, high-bandwidth fat suppression, and parallel imaging. However, the increased susceptibility induced distortions near brain-air interfaces hindered its application near the skull base and posterior fossa.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by NIH NS40117, NIH 1 T32 EB001631-01A1, joint funding from General Electric Healthcare Technologies and the Life Sciences and Informatics Program award number LSIT01-10107, as part of the University of California’s Industry University Cooperative Research Program, and a seed grant from the Department of Radiology of the University of California, San Francisco.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

1. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys. 1994;66:259–267. [PubMed]
2. Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology. 1996;201:637–648. [PubMed]
3. Basser PJ, Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C, Duda J, Aldroubi A. In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:625–632. [PubMed]
4. Conturo TE, Lori NF, Cull TS, Akbudak E, Snyder AZ, Shimony JS, McKinstry RC, Burton H, Raichle ME. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10422–10427. [PubMed]
5. Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, van Zijl PCM. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:265–269. [PubMed]
6. Frank LR. Anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:935–939. [PubMed]
7. Alexander DC, Barker GJ, Arridge SR. Detection and modeling of non-Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:331–340. [PubMed]
8. Frank LR. Characterization of anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1083–1099. [PubMed]
9. Tuch DS, Reese TG, Wiegell MR, Makris N, Belliveau JW, Wedeen VJ. High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:577–582. [PubMed]
10. Özarslan E, Mareci TH. Generalized diffusion tensor imaging and analytical relationships between diffusion tensor imaging and high angular resolution diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:955–965. [PubMed]
11. Liu C, Bammer R, Acar B, Moseley ME. Characterizing non-Gaussian diffusion by using generalized diffusion tensors. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:924–937. [PubMed]
12. Jansons KM, Alexander DC. Persistent Angular Structure: new insights from diffusion MRI data. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2003;18:672–683. [PubMed]
13. Zhan W, Stein EA, Yang Y. Mapping the orientation of intravoxel crossing fibers based on the phase information of diffusion circular spectrum. Neuroimage. 2004;23:1358–1369. [PubMed]
14. Tuch DS, Reese TG, Wiegell MR, Wedeen VJ. Diffusion MRI of complex neural architecture. Neuron. 2003;40:885–895. [PubMed]
15. Tuch DS. Q-ball imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:1358–1372. [PubMed]
16. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage. 2004;23:1176–1185. [PubMed]
17. Anderson AW. Measurement of fiber orientation distributions using high angular resolution diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1194–1206. [PubMed]
18. Özarslan E, Shepherd TM, Vemuri BC, Blackband SJ, Mareci TH. Resolution of complex tissue microarchitecture using the diffusion orientation transform (DOT) Neuroimage. 2006;31:1086–1103. [PubMed]
19. Hess CP, Mukherjee P, Han ET, Xu D, Vigneron DB. Q-ball reconstruction of multimodal fiber orientations using the spherical harmonic basis. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:104–117. [PubMed]
20. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. Improved characterization of crossing fibers: spherical deconvolution combined with Tikhonov regularization. Book of abstracts: Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; ISMRM; Seattle, WA. 2006. p. 645.
21. Sakaie KE, Lowe MJ. An objective method for regularization of fiber orientation distributions derived from diffusion-weighted MRI. Neuroimage. 2007;34:169–176. [PubMed]
22. Assaf Y, Freidlin RZ, Rohde GK, Basser PJ. New modeling and experimental framework to characterize hindered and restricted water diffusion in brain white matter. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52:965–978. [PubMed]
23. Wedeen VJ, Hagmann P, Tseng WY, Reese TG, Weisskoff RM. Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 54:1377–1386. [PubMed]
24. Wu YC, Alexander AL. Hybrid diffusion imaging. Neuroimage. 2007 Epub before print, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.050. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Hammond K, Lupo J, Kelley D, Nelson S. Comparison of the B0 field and shimming in human brains at 3T and 7T. Book of abstracts: Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; ISMRM; Seattle, WA. 2006. p. 2352.
26. Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:515–525. [PubMed]
27. Jiang H, van Zijl PC, Kim J, Pearlson GD, Mori S. DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 81:106–116. [PubMed]
28. Reeder SB, Wintersperger BJ, Dietrich O, Lanz T, Greiser A, Reiser MF, Glazer GM, Schoenberg SO. Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:748–754. [PubMed]
29. Campbell JS, Siddiqi K, Rymar VV, Sadikot AF, Pike GB. Flow-based fiber tracking with diffusion tensor and q-ball data: validation and comparison to principal diffusion direction techniques. Neuroimage. 2005;27:725–736. [PubMed]
30. Perrin M, Poupon C, Rieul B, Leroux P, Constantinesco A, Mangin JF, Lebihan D. Validation of q-ball imaging with a diffusion fibre-crossing phantom on a clinical scanner. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360:881–891. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Rutt BK, Lee DH. The impact of field strength on image quality in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6:57–62. [PubMed]
32. Jaermann T, Crelier G, Pruessmann KP, Golay X, Netsch T, van Muiswinkel AM, Mori S, van Zijl PC, Valavanis A, Kollias S, Boesiger P. SENSE-DTI at 3 T. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:230–236. [PubMed]
33. Jaermann T, Pruessmann KP, Valavanis A, Kollias S, Boesiger P. Influence of SENSE on image properties in high-resolution single-shot echo-planar DTI. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:335–342. [PubMed]
34. Ohliger MA, Grant AK, Sodickson DK. Ultimate intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio for parallel MRI: electromagnetic field considerations. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:1018–1030. [PubMed]
35. Wiesinger F, Van de Moortele PF, Adriany G, De Zanche N, Ugurbil K, Pruessmann KP. Parallel imaging performance as a function of field strength – an experimental investigation using electrodynamic scaling. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:953–964. [PubMed]
36. Wiesinger F, Van de Moortele PF, Adriany G, De Zanche N, Ugurbil K, Pruessmann KP. Potential and feasibility of parallel MRI at high field. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:368–378. [PubMed]
37. Voss HU, Watts R, Ulug AM, Ballon D. Fiber tracking in the cervical spine and inferior brain regions with reversed gradient diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:231–239. [PubMed]
38. Pipe JG, Farthing VG, Forbes KP. Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:42–52. [PubMed]
39. Wang FN, Huang TY, Lin FH, Chuang TC, Chen NK, Chung HW, Chen CY, Kwong KK. PROPELLER EPI: an MRI technique suitable for diffusion tensor imaging at high field strength with reduced geometric distortions. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1232–1240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Nolte UG, Finsterbusch J, Frahm J. Rapid isotropic diffusion mapping without susceptibility artifacts: whole brain studies using diffusion-weighted single-shot STEAM MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:731–736. [PubMed]
41. Boretius S, Wurfel J, Zipp F, Frahm J, Michaelis T. High-field diffusion tensor imaging of mouse brain in vivo using single-shot STEAM MRI. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;161:112–117. [PubMed]
42. Chuang TC, Huang TY, Lin FH, Wang FN, Juan CJ, Chung HW, Chen CY, Kwong KK. PROPELLER-EPI with parallel imaging using a circularly symmetric phased-array RF coil at 3.0 T: application to high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:1352–1358. 2006. [PubMed]
43. Katscher U, Bornert P, Leussler C, van den Brink JS. Transmit SENSE. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:144–150. [PubMed]
44. Adriany G, Van de Moortele PF, Wiesinger F, Moeller S, Strupp JP, Andersen P, Snyder C, Zhang X, Chen W, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P, Vaughan T, Ugurbil K. Transmit and receive transmission line arrays for 7 Tesla parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:434–445. [PubMed]
45. Setsompop K, Wald LL, Alagappan V, Gagoski B, Hebrank F, Fontius U, Schmitt F, Adalsteinsson E. Parallel RF transmission with eight channels at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:1163–1171. [PubMed]