Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of ijmsMDPIhomeThis articleThis journalInstructions for authorsSubscribeIJMS
Int J Mol Sci. 2010; 11(10): 4063–4079.
Published online 2010 October 20. doi:  10.3390/ijms11104063
PMCID: PMC2996785

In Vitro Efficacy of Myxococcus fulvus ANSM068 to Biotransform Aflatoxin B1


Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is commonly found in cereals and animal feeds and causes a significant threat to the food industry and animal production. Several microbial isolates with high AFB1 transformation ability have been identified in our previous studies. The aim of this research was to characterize one of those isolates, Myxococcus fulvus ANSM068, and to explore its biotransformation mechanism. The bacterial isolate of M. fulvus ANSM068, isolated from deer feces, was able to transform AFB1 by 80.7% in liquid VY/2 medium after incubation at 30 °C for 72 h. The supernatant of the bacterial culture was more effective in transforming AFB1 as compared to the cells alone and the cell extract. The transformation activity was significantly reduced and eradicated after the culture supernatant was treated with proteinase K, proteinase K plus SDS and heating. Culture conditions, including nitrogen source, initial pH and incubation temperature were evaluated for an optimal AFB1 transformation. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) analyses showed that AFB1 was transformed to a structurally different compound. Infrared analysis (IR) indicated that the lactone ring on the AFB1 molecule was modified by the culture supernatant. Chromatographies on DEAE-Ion exchange and Sephadex-Molecular sieve and SDS-PAGE electrophoresis were used to determine active components from the culture supernatant, indicating that enzyme(s) were responsible for the AFB1 biotransformation. This is the first report on AFB1 transformation by a strain of myxobacteria through enzymatic reaction(s).

Keywords: aflatoxin B1, biotransformation, culture supernatant, Myxococcus fulvus ANSM068

1. Introduction

Aflatoxins are a group of structurally related secondary metabolites produced mainly by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus [1]. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), one of the most hazardous mycotoxins, is extremely toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic [2,3]. It poses a severe threat to both livestock productivity and human health, thus resulting in huge economic losses worldwide each year [4,5].

Interest in biological detoxification of AFB1 has greatly increased during the past decade. Several fungal species have been found to be able to biotransform AFB1 into less toxic metabolites; such fungi include Pleurotus ostreatus [6], Trametes versicolor [7], Rhizopus sp., Mucor sp. [8], and a few yeasts such as Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans [9], Saccharomyces cerevisiae [10], Trichoderma strains [11], and Armillariella tabescens [12]. The biotransformation activities of these fungi were mainly demonstrated with cell extracts. However, practical applications of these fungi may be limited by factors such as long incubation time required for the detoxification and complicated procedures needed for obtaining the active extracts. Reduction of AFB1 by bacteria has also been reported; most of the published studies focused on lactic acid bacteria, such as strains belonging to Lactobacillus [13,14], Bifidobacterium [15,16], Propionibacterium [17] and Lactococcus [18]. However, the AFB1 reduction by these bacteria was proven to be mainly by cell binding rather than biotransformation. Most importantly, this kind of binding seems to be reversible, which means that AFB1 can hardly be removed completely from contaminated media.

Recently, several studies reported biological transformation of AFB1 by microbial culture or their secondary metabolites. These microbes include Rhodococcus erythropolis [19], Mycobacterium fluoranthenivorans [20,21], Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [22] and Nocardia corynebacterioides (formerly Flavobacterium aurantiacum) [2326]. Some studies further explored the role of enzymes in secondary metabolites on AFB1 biotransformation [6,27]. Evidence showed that AFB1 biotransformation by microorganisms and their metabolites, especially enzymes, is specific, effective and environmentally sound.

Myxobacteria are a kind of higher prokaryotic organism and are reported to be a rich source of secondary metabolites [28,29]. To date, more than 80 basic structures and 450 structural variants have been described from microbes, most of which are exclusively produced by myxobacteria [30]. One of the unique characteristics that myxobacteria possess is the prolific production of extracellular lytic enzymes and antibiotics, many of which are being used as human drugs [3136]. It has been well studied that all myxobacteria specialize in biotransformation of biomacromolecules [30]. However, such microorganisms and their secondary metabolites have not been reported to show mycotoxin biotransformation ability. In our previous studies, several microbes with AFB1 biotransformation ability were isolated by using a newly developed coumarin medium method [22]. One of those microbes that was isolated from deer feces exhibited high AFB1 biotransformation ability in liquid culture. It was further identified as a bacterial strain of Myxococcus fulvus and designated M. fulvus K2 It was later renamed as M. fulvus ANSM068 according to the laboratory’s regulations.

The objective of this study was to further characterize M. fulvus ANSM068 as an AFB1 biotransformation agent, to optimize the biotransformation conditions and to explore the biotransformation mechanism.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. AFB1 Biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068

The bacterial culture of M. fulvus ANSM068 reduced AFB1 by 80.7% after co-incubation at 30 °C for 72 h. The culture supernatant of M. fulvus ANSM068 was able to reduce AFB1 by 76.6%. However, no significant reduction was observed in the treatments with the cells and cell extracts (Figure 1). Culture supernatant treated with proteinase K (Prok) displayed significantly decreased reduction ability, from 76.6 to 18.9%. No reduction of AFB1 concentration was observed when the culture supernatant was treated with Prok plus SDS or with heating (boiling water bath for 10 min) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
AFB1 biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068. 1. Liquid culture; 2. Culture supernatant; 3. Cell extracts; 4. Cell; 5. Proteinase K (Prok) treated culture supernatant; 6. Prok + SDS treated culture supernatant; 7. Heat treated culture supernatant. The ...

Myxobacteria became well-known as prolific producers of secondary metabolites during the past few decades [37,38]. Thus far, no pathogenic myxobacteria have been observed and many bioactive components and drugs were isolated from myxobacteria [3941]. Myxococcus fulvus was first documented and characterized in 1969 [42]. It is a species of myxobacteria, a group of Gram-negative eubacteria with rod-shaped cells. The colonial and cell morphology of M. fulvus ANSM068 are shown in Figure 2. It was previously found to be capable of reducing AFB1 [22]. Up to now, no study has focused on mycotoxin control by using myxobacteria. This is the first report on mycotoxin biotransformation by a bacterial strain belonging to myxobacteria.

Figure 2
Colony (left) and cell (right) morphology of Myxococcus fulvus ANSM068.

Reduction of AFB1 by culture supernatant produced without pre-exposure to AFB1 suggested that it was achieved during the normal growth of the bacterium, indicating that the reduction was a constitutive activity of M. fulvus ANSM068. Results from proteinase K, proteinase K plus SDS and heating treatments implied that the reduction of AFB1 was due to biotransformation instead of cell binding. Protein or enzymes in culture supernatant might be involved in AFB1 biotransformation by the bacterial strain.

2.2. Optimal Culture Conditions for AFB1 Biotransformation

Nitrogen sources have a dramatic effect on AFB1 biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068. Yeast extract was found to be the best nitrogen source for AFB1 biotransformation and resulted in 76.6% AFB1 biotransformation (Figure 3). In comparison, AFB1 biotransformation was significantly (P < 0.05) lower with ammonium nitrate (25.8%). Among the four levels of yeast extract tested (0.2, 0.5, 0.8 and 1.2%), 0.5% was optimal for AFB1 biotransformation (76.6%). Nitrogen in substrates is one of the most important factors influencing myxobacteria growth and production of metabolites. Chun [43] studied the effect of different nitrogen sources on the production of antifungal metabolites by myxobacteria in liquid culture and found that yeast extract improved secretion of antifungal metabolites but fish meal, soybean powder and inorganic nitrogen treatments showed no function. A similar trend was also observed in this study. Yeast extract was most favored in AFB1 biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068 and inorganic nitrogen was far less effective. The reasons could be that in natural environments these myxobacteria feed on other organisms such as eubacteria or yeasts by bacteriolysis or cellular lysis [44]. The nutrients ratio such as amino acid and vitamins in yeast extract might be more suitable to the bacterial strain for its growth and production of AFB1 biotransformation components.

Figure 3
AFB1 biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068 in different nitrogen sources. 1. Yeast extract; 2. Peptone; 3. Beef extract; 4. Tryptone; 5. Fish peptone; 6. Ammonium nitrate. The reactions were performed at 30 °C for 72 h. Each value is a mean ± ...

The initial pH value in culture medium showed a significant effect on AFB1 biotransformation (Figure 4). The highest AFB1 biotransformation rate was detected at pH values of 6.5 to 7.5 (P < 0.05). It has been well documented that the optimum pH range for myxobacteria is 6.8–7.8 in liquid culture [45]. Ahn et al. [46] studied the effect of pH value on antifungal metabolites produced by a Myxococcus isolate and found that a pH value between 6.5 and 7.6 was favored and the optimal pH value was 7.2.

Figure 4
Effect of initial pH of the medium on AFB1 biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068. Initial pH value was determined by adjusting the culture pH to 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5 by using citrate acid buffer, and to 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 9.0 by sodium phosphate buffer. The ...

The effect of temperature on AFB1 biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068 is shown in Figure 5. The % biotransformation exhibited was significantly lower (P < 0.05) at 15 °C (11.0%) and 40 °C (18.9%) than at 30 °C (76.6%). Since the bacterial strain originated from deer feces, a temperature at 30 °C should be more suitable for the survival and growth of the bacterium, thus optimal for its enzyme system.

Figure 5
Effect of temperature on AFB1 biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068. The reactions were performed at 30 °C for 72 h. Each value is a mean ± SE of three replicates. Means within a row with no common letters differ (P < 0.05).

2.3. AFB1 Biotransformation Product Analysis

In the analysis by LCMS, AFB1 standard was identified at m/z = 313 for the protonated cation [M + H]+, m/z = 335 for the sodium adduct of AFB1 [M + Na]+, and at m/z = 351 for the potassium adduct [M + K]+ (Figure 6A); VY/2 medium supplemented with AFB1 clearly showed the above three distinct ions (Figure 6B). However, the distinct AFB1 ion at m/z =351 disappeared while the ions at m/z = 313 and m/z = 335 significantly decreased after AFB1 was co-incubated with M. fulvus ANSM068 culture supernatant for 72 h (Figure 6C). These results suggest AFB1 level was significantly reduced although it was still present.

Figure 6
Detection of AFB1 by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. (A) LC-MS spectrum of AFB1 standard at 100 ppb showing the distinct ions: [M + H]+ at m/z = 313, [M + Na]+ at m/z = 335 and [M + K]+ at m/z = 351. (B) LC-MS spectrum of VY/2 medium supplemented ...

Additionally, the HPLC chromatograph (Figure 7) confirmed that AFB1 (peak eluting at 8.27 min) was biotransformed to a new product eluting at 3.17 min. The IR spectrum showed that there were three major modifications in absorption peaks between the standard AFB1 and the product resulting from culture supernatant treatment (Figure 8). The absorption peak at 1728 cm−1 in AFB1 standard disappeared after the treatment, which indicates that the lactone attached to the benzene ring was modified. The two peaks in the area between 1658 and 1634 cm−1 in AFB1 standard changed into one peak after treatment. The change at 2930 cm−1 indicates modification of methyl group.

Figure 7
Detection of AFB1 biotransformation product by HPLC. (A) AFB1 standard with concentration of 100 ppb in liquid VY/2 medium. The peak at 8.27 min represents AFB1. (B) AFB1 treatment after 72 h incubation with culture supernatant. Peak at 3.17 min represents ...
Figure 8
Infrared spectrometry spectrum of AFB1. (A) Spectrum of AFB1 standard. The initial AFB1 concentration was 100 ppb. (B) Spectrum of AFB1 product after 72 h incubation with culture supernatant. AFB1 biotransformation product was extracted by adding 2 mL ...

Alberts et al. [19] explored the AFB1 biotransformation product with Rhodococcus erythropolis extracellular fractions by electro spray mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis. By comparing the three distinct AFB1 peaks among treatments, AFB1 was still present but at a lower concentration. No breakdown products were revealed, which suggested that AFB1 was most likely metabolized to biotransformation products with chemical properties different from that of AFB1. Liu et al. [12] compared the infrared spectrum between AFB1 standard and fungal enzyme treated AFB1. Opening of the difuran ring was proposed since the group of five bands in the area between 1000 cm−1 and 1200 cm−1 did not appear in the spectrum of the enzyme treated AFB1. Marisa and Das [4] analyzed the biotransformed AFB1 structure by fluorescence spectra measurements and TLC. Treatment of AFB1 with purified enzyme resulted in a decrease in fluorescence intensity, suggesting the enzymatic cleavage of the lactone ring. The lactone ring was confirmed to be responsible for toxicity and mutagenicity in AFB1 [47,48]. In the current study, results from LCMS, HPLC and IR analysis confirmed AFB1 biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068 instead of cell binding. Modification of the lactone ring on the AFB1 molecule may result in detoxification although further investigation needs to be done. This result implies the potential applications of M. fulvus ANSM068 or its metabolites in detoxifying AFB1 in contaminated food or feed.

2.4. Characterization of Active Components from Culture Supernatant

Since the culture supernatant of M. fulvus ANSM068 exhibited high AFB1 biotransformation activity, it was selected for active components extraction. Precipitates from 80% saturated ammonium sulfate showed higher AFB1 biotransformation activity, with 54.1% of AFB1 biotransformed. Chromatography was used to purify enzyme from the precipitates. Two peaks were obtained by ion exchange chromatography on DEAE A-50 column and UV detection at 280 nm (Figure 9A). The second peak, which showed AFB1 biotransformation activity (35.5%), was applied to molecular sieve chromatography on a Sephadex G-100 column (Figure 9B). SDS-PAGE showed that the active components consist of at least three proteins with a relatively small molecular weight between 20 and 66 kDa (Figure 9C).

Figure 9
Determination of active components from culture supernatant by chromatography and SDS-PAGE. (A) Ion exchange chromatography on DEAE A-50 column. The column was pre-equilibrated with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.5. Elution was performed with the ...

To date, there are only a few reports on extraction or purification of mycotoxin biotransformation active components from microbial metabolites. Liu et al. [27] extracted and purified an intracellular enzyme from fungi Armillariella tabescens by ammonium sulfate precipitation, ion exchange chromatography and chromatofocusing chromatography. The AFB1 detoxification enzyme was then characterized to have a molecular mass of 51.8 kDa by SDS-PAGE and it exhibited a specific activity of 7.09 nmol min/mg at pH 6.0 and 28 °C. Motomura et al. [6] purified an aflatoxin biotransformation enzyme from the edible mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus by two chromatographies on DEAE-Sepharose and Phenyl-Sepharose. The apparent molecular mass of the purified enzyme was estimated to be 90 kDa by SDS-PAGE. This study has confirmed that the AFB1 biotransformation components exist in the culture supernatant and are very likely enzyme(s). Further purification and identification of the enzyme(s) are undergoing.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Bacterium, Mycotoxin and Medium

Myxococcus fulvus ANSM068 was isolated and purified from deer feces collected from the Beijing Zoo in July, 2006. It was identified using physiological and biochemical tests and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis by the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) and has been deposited there as CGMCC #3194. It was preserved at −80 °C before use (China Agriculture University, Beijing, China).

AFB1 was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (Bellefonte, USA). The medium used for liquid culture, VY/2 medium, contains 5 g yeast extract, 1 g CaCl2, 0.5 g MgSO4, 0.5 mg VB12 in 1 L distilled water at room temperature.

3.2. AFB1 Quantification

For AFB1 analysis, the HPLC procedure by AOAC [49] was used with slight modifications. The reaction mixtures were extracted three times with chloroform. The chloroform extracts were evaporated under nitrogen at room temperature, the residue was dissolved in 50% methanol in water (1:1, v/v) and analyzed by HPLC. HPLC analysis was performed using a LiChroCART RP-C18 (250-4 Hypersil ODS (5 μm), Merck) column with a guard column (LiChroCART 4-4 RP-C18 (5 μm), Merck). The mobile phase was methanol: water (1:1, v/v) isocratic at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. AFB1 was derivatized by a photochemical reactor (AURA, USA) and measured by a fluorescence detector. The excitation and detection wavelengths were set at 360 and 440 nm, respectively. The percentage of AFB1 biotransformation was calculated using the following formula:

(1-AFB1peak area in treatment/AFB1peak area in control)×100%

3.3. Efficacy of AFB1 Biotransformation by M. fulvus ANSM068

Biotransformation of AFB1 by M. fulvus ANSM068 was carried out in liquid culture. The bacterial isolate was cultured in VY/2 medium for 24 h and used to inoculate VY/2 (50 mL) in a 300 mL flask, which was incubated at 30 °C with agitation at 160 rpm for 50 h in a Gyrotary shaker incubator without AFB1 (Haerbin Donglian Electronic Equipment Inc., China). AFB1 standard solution (Sigma Chemical Co., Bellefonte, USA) was diluted with methanol (Beijing Chemical Inc., Beijing, China) to a stock solution of 500 ppb, of which 0.2 mL was added to bacterial cultures of 0.8 mL for a final concentration of 100 ppb. The biotransformation tests were conducted in the dark at 30 °C without shaking for 72 h. After incubation, bacterial cells were removed by centrifugation at 9,300 g for 10 min (TGL-16C centrifuge, Beijing Medical Centrifuge Inc., China). Sterile VY/2 medium was used to substitute the bacterial culture in the control.

Biotransformation of AFB1 by cells, culture supernatant and intracellular cell extracts was conducted according to the procedure of Shu et al. [22]. Cells were pelleted using a centrifuge at 9,300 g, 4 °C for 10 min. The pellets were washed twice with a phosphate buffer (50 mM; pH 7.5) before being resuspended in the phosphate buffer (5 mL). Culture supernatant was obtained by centrifuging 50 h liquid culture at 9,300 g, 4 °C for 10 min. Intracellular cell extracts were harvested by the following procedures. The cell suspension was disintegrated twice (work every other 5 s for 33 min) by using ultrasonic cell disintegrator on ice. The disintegrated cell suspension was centrifuged at 9,300 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The cell extracts were collected by filtering the supernatant aseptically using 0.2 μm pore size sterile cellulose pyrogen free filters. The phosphate buffer solution (50 mM; pH 7.5) was used to substitute intracellular cell extracts and cells in the controls. The effect of protease treatment was determined by exposing the culture supernatant to 1 mg/mL proteinase K (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland; specific activity ≥ 30 U/mg) for 1 h at 37 °C; 1 mg/mL proteinase K plus 1% SDS for 6 h at 37 °C. The effect of heat treatment was determined by dipping the culture supernatant into a boiling water bath for 10 min. 0.2 mL of AFB1 stock solution was added to 0.8 mL of each reaction liquid for a final concentration of 100 ppb. The biotransformation tests were conducted in the dark at 30 °C without shaking for 72 h. After incubation, bacterial cells were removed by centrifugation at 9,300 g for 10 min (TGL-16C centrifuge, Beijing Medical Centrifuge Inc., China). The untreated culture supernatant was used as control.

3.4. Culture Conditions Affecting AFB1 Biotransformation

Unless specifically indicated, all biotransformation experiments were conducted by using culture supernatant at 30 °C for 72 h with aeration. Culture supernatant was obtained by centrifuging 50 h culture with 9,300 g at 4 °C for 20 min.

To detect the appropriate nitrogen source for the bacterial growth with optimum AFB1 biotransformation, 0.5% of tryptone, peptone, beef extract, yeast extract, fish peptone and ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) were chosen as the nitrogen source in the culture medium.

Initial pH value in VY/2 medium was adjusted to 5.0, 5.5, 6.0 by using citrate acid buffer, and to 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 9.0 by sodium phosphate buffer.

Cultivation was performed at 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 °C respectively for 50 h before the culture supernatants were harvested.

3.5. AFB1 Biotransformation Product Analysis

The biotransformation products of AFB1 after 72 h incubation with culture supernatants were determined by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) and infrared analysis (IR). For LCMS, the following samples were analyzed: (a) AFB1 standard, (b) VY/2 medium supplemented with AFB1, (c) AFB1 treated with culture supernatants for 72 h. The samples were extracted with chloroform, dried under nitrogen, suspended in methanol: water (1:1, v/v) and analyzed by LCMS using a Phenomenex 2.0 × 150 mm C18 column and methanol: acetonitrile: water (1:1:2, v/v/v) as solvent, at a flow rate of 100 μL/min. The HPLC system was equipped with a Finnigan Spectra System UV6000LP ultraviolet (UV) detector. Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) positive ion mode was used for MS detection (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA, USA).

For IR analysis, 2 mL chloroform was added to the incubation mixture and vortexed for 30 seconds. The phases were separated by low-speed centrifugation and the organic phase was evaporated to dryness at 20 °C under N2. The samples were purified by HPLC before IR analysis. IR analysis was carried out with a KBr pellet using an IR spectrophotometer (NEXUS-470F TIR, Nicolet, Japan). Sterile VY/2 medium was used to substitute culture supernatant in the control.

3.6. Determination of Active Components from Culture Supernatant

3.6.1. Precipitation of Active Components

Methanol, acetone, ethanol and solid ammonium sulphate were used to precipitate the active components. For the organic solvents, 500 mL of each of the chilled solvent was added to 150 mL of the culture supernatant. For ammonium sulphate, 150 mL of the culture supernatant was supplemented to 20, 40, 60 and 80% saturation respectively under constant stirring. The above solutions were stored at 4 °C for 4 h followed by centrifugation at 9,300 g for 20 min. The precipitates were dissolved in 2 mL of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). The ammonium sulphate treatments were dialysed over night against distilled water before being applied to chromatography.

3.6.2. Purification of the Active Components by Chromatography

The dialyzed samples were applied to a DEAE A-50 Ion exchange column (Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden) pre-equilibrated with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.5. Elution was performed with the same buffer and by a gradient of 0.5 M NaCl in the buffer. Fractions of 2 mL were collected in separate tubes at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The protein concentration in each eluted fraction was detected at 280 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The fractions with AFB1 biotransformation activity were combined and applied to a Sephadex G-100 Molecular sieve column (Pharmacia) pre-equilibrated with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.2 M NaCl. Proteins were eluted with the same buffer and fractions of 2 mL were collected in separate tubes at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. After dialysis against buffer, the AFB1 biotransformation activity of each fraction was tested.

3.6.3. Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

SDS-PAGE was performed in 12.5% polyacrylamide gels according to the method of Motomura et al. [6]. The separated proteins were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Fluka, Switzerland) and their molecular weights were determined by comparison with low range molecular weight markers (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden).

3.7. Statistical Analyses

The results were average of triplicates and were expressed as mean ± standard error. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized single factor design by ANOVA using the general linear models procedure in SAS. Significant F tests at the 0.05 levels of probability are reported. When a significant F-value was detected, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used to determine significant differences among means.

4. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the ability of M. fulvus ANSM068 to effectively biotransform AFB1. Furthermore, optimal conditions for biotransformation were determined as follows: 0.5% of yeast extract as nitrogen source; initial pH value at 7.5; temperature at 30 °C. The results indicated that enzyme(s) in the culture supernatant was responsible for the biotransformation although further confirmation is needed. Research is underway to purify the effective enzyme(s) and to identify metabolites produced during the biotransformation processes. The AFB1 biotransformation enzymes, once identified, may be mass-produced by the bacterial isolate and be used to treat materials contaminated with AFB1.


The authors would like to thank J Christopher Young from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada for English correction and Yuezhong Li from Shandong University for technical guidance in myxobacteria isolation. Financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Contract number: 30571353) and team research funds of National Key Lab for Animal Nutrition are gratefully acknowledged.


1. Eaton DL, Groopman JD. The Toxicology of Aflatoxins. Human Health, Veterinary and Agricultural Significance. Academic Press; San Diego, CA, USA: 1994.
2. Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal, and Human Systems. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology; Ames, IA, USA: 2003.
3. Bhatnagar D, Ehrlich KC, Cleveland TE. Molecular genetic analysis and regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003;61:83–93. [PubMed]
4. Marisa HN, Das C. A review on biological control and metabolism of aflatoxin. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2003;43:245–264. [PubMed]
5. Diaz DE. The Mycotoxin Blue Book. Nottingham University Press; Nottingham, UK: 2005.
6. Motomura M, Toyomasu T, Mizuno K, Shinozawa T. Purification and characterization of an aflatoxin degradation enzyme from Pleurotus ostreatus. Microbiol. Res. 2003;158:237–242. [PubMed]
7. Zjalic S, Reverberi M, Ricelli A, Granito VM, Fanelli C, Fabbri AA. Trametes versicolor: A possible tool for aflatoxin control. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006;107:243–249. [PubMed]
8. Varga J, Peteri Z, Tabori K, Teren J, Vagvolgyi C. Degradation of ochratoxin A and other mycotoxins by Rhizopus isolates. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005;99:321–328. [PubMed]
9. Molnar O, Schatzmayr G, Elisabeth F, Prillinger H. Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans sp. nov., A new yeast species useful in biological detoxification of various mycotoxins. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;27:661–671. [PubMed]
10. Shetty PH, Jespersen L. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria as potential mycotoxin decontaminating agents. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2006;17:48–55.
11. Shantha T. Fungal degradation of aflatoxin B1. Nat. Toxin. 1999;7:175–178. [PubMed]
12. Liu DL, Yao DS, Liang R, Ma L, Cheng WQ, Gu LQ. Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by enzymes isolated from Armillariella tabescens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1998;36:563–574. [PubMed]
13. El-Nezami H, Kankaanpaa P, Salminen S, Ahogas J. Ability of dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria to bind a common food carcinogen, aflatoxin B1. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1998;36:321–326. [PubMed]
14. Gratz S, Mykkanen H, El-Nezami H. Aflatoxin B1 binding by a mixture of Lactobacillus and Propionibacterium: In vitro versus ex vivo. J. Food Prot. 2005;68:2470–2474. [PubMed]
15. Peltonen K, El-Nezami H, Haskard C, Ahogas J, Salminen S. Aflatoxin B1 binding by dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 2001;84:2152–2156. [PubMed]
16. Peltonen K, El-Nezami H, Salminen S, Ahogas J. Binding of aflatoxin B1 by probiotic bacteria. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000;80:1942–1945.
17. El-Nezami H, Mykkanen H, Kankaanpaa P, Salminen S, Ahokas J. Ability of Lactobacillus and Propionibacterium strains to remove aflatoxin B1 from the chicken duodenum. J. Food Prot. 2000;63:549–552. [PubMed]
18. Pierides M, El-nezami H, Peltonen K, Salminen S, Ahokas J. Ability of dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria to bind aflatoxin M1 in a food model. J. Food Prot. 2000;63:645–650. [PubMed]
19. Alberts JF, Engelbrecht Y, Steyn PS, Holzapfel WH, Vanzyl WH. Biological degradation of aflatoxin B1 by Rhodococcus erythropolis cultures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006;109:121–126. [PubMed]
20. Teniola OD, Addo PA, Brost IM, Farber P, Jany KD, Alberts JF, Vanzyl WH, Steyn PS, Holzapfel WH. Degradation of aflatoxin B1 by cell-free extracts of Rhodococcus erythropolis and Mycobacterium fluoranthenivorans sp. nov. DSM 44556T. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005;105:111–117. [PubMed]
21. Hormisch D, Brost I, Kohring GW, Giffhorn F, Kroppensted RM, Stackebrandt E, Färber P, Holzapfel WH. Mycobacterium fluoranthenivorans sp. nov., a fluoranthene and aflatoxin B1 degrading bacterium from contaminated soil of a former coal gas plant. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;27:653–660. [PubMed]
22. Shu G, Cheng J, Ting Z, Junxia L, Qiugang M, Tiangui N. Aflatoxin B1 degradation by Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia and other microbes selected using coumarin medium. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008;9:1489–1503. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. D'Souza DH, Brackett RE. The role of trace metal ions in aflatoxin B1 degradation by Flavobacterium aurantiacum. J. Food Prot. 1998;61:1666–1669. [PubMed]
24. D'Souza DH, Brackett RE. The influence of divalent cations and chelators on aflatoxin B1 degradation by Flavobacterium aurantiacum. J. Food Prot. 2000;63:102–105. [PubMed]
25. D'Souza DH, Brackett RE. Aflatoxin B1 degradation by Flavobacterium aurantiacum in the presence of reducing conditions and seryl and sulfhydryl group inhibitors. J. Food Prot. 2001;64:268–271. [PubMed]
26. Smiley RD, Draughon FA. Preliminary evidence that degradation of aflatoxin B1 by Flavobacterium aurantiacum is enzymatic. J. Food Prot. 2000;63:415–418. [PubMed]
27. Liu DL, Yao DS, Liang YQ, Zhou TH, Song YP, Ma L. Production, purification, and characterization of an intracellular aflatoxin-detoxifizyme from Armillariella tabescens (E-20) Food Chem. Toxicol. 2001;39:461–466. [PubMed]
28. Reichenbach H, Dworkin M. The Prokaryote. Spriger-Verlag; New York, NY, USA: 1992. The myxobacteria; pp. 3418–3487.
29. Reichenbach H, Hoefle G. Myxobacteria. American Society for Microbiology; Washington DC, USA: 1993. Production of bioactive secondary metabolites; pp. 347–397.
30. Reichenbach H. Myxobacteria, producers of noval bioactive substances. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 2001;27:149–156. [PubMed]
31. Rosenberg E, Dworkin M. Autocides and a paracide, antibiotic TA, produced by Myxoxcoccus xanthus. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 1996;17:424–431.
32. Bode HB, Irschik H, Wenzel SC, Reichenbach H, Muller R, Höfle G. The leupyrrins: A structurally unique family of secondary metabolites from the myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum. J. Nat. Prod. 2003;66:1203–1206. [PubMed]
33. Jansen R, Kunze B, Reichenbach H, Hoefle G. Antibiotics from gliding bacteria. Part 93. Chondrochloren A and B, new amino styrenes from Chondromyces crocatus (Myxobacteria) Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003;14:2684–2689.
34. Sasse F, Steinmetz H, Hoefle G. Archazolids, new cytotoxic macrolactones from Archangium gephyra (myxobacteria). Production, isolation, physico-chemical and biological properties. J. Antibiot. 2003;56:520–525. [PubMed]
35. Leibold T, Sasse F, Reichenbach H, Höfle G. Cyrmenins, novel antifungal peptides containing a nitrogen-Linked β-methoxyacrylate pharmacophore: Isolation and structural elucidation. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004;2:431–435.
36. Kunze B, Reichenbach H, Mueller R, Höfle G. Aurafuron A and B, new bioactive polyketides from Stigmatella aurantiaca and Archangium gephyra (myxobacteria). Fermentation, isolation, physico-chemical properties, structure and biological activity. J. Antibiot. 2005;58:244–251. [PubMed]
37. Reichenbach H, Hoefle G. Myxobacteria as producers of secondary metabolites. In: Grabley S, editor. Drug Discovery from Nature. Springer Verlag; Berlin, Germany: 1999. pp. 149–179.
38. Gerth K, Pradella S, Perlova O, Beyer S, Müller R. Myxobacteria: proficient producers of novel natural products with various biological activities-past and future biotechnological aspects with the focus on the genus Sorangium. J. Biotechnol. 2003;106:233–253. [PubMed]
39. Jansen R, Kunze B, Reichenbach H, Hofle G. Apicularen A and B, cytotoxic 10-membered lactones with a novel mechanism of action from chondromyces species (myxobacteria)-isolation, structure elucidation, and biosynthesis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000;7:913–919.
40. Gupte M, Kulkarni P, Ganguli BN. Antifungal antibiotics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002;58:46–57. [PubMed]
41. Steinmetz H, Glaser N, Herdtweck E, Sasse F, Reichenbach H, Hofle G. Isolation, crystal and solution structure determination, and biosynthesis of tubulysins, powerful inhibitors of tubulin polymerization from myxobacteria. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:4888–4892. [PubMed]
42. Szczepkowska E. Exobasidium japonicum and myxococcus fulvus on pot grown azalea japonicad. Wszechswiat. 1969;9:237–238.
43. Chun X. Master thesis. Hua Nan Tropical Agricultural University; Guangzhou, China: 2003. Screening of anti-fungal components from marine bacteria.
44. David W. Biology and global distribution of myxobacteria in soils. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2000;24:403–427. [PubMed]
45. Reichenbach H. The ecology of the myxobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 1999;1:15–21. [PubMed]
46. Ahn JW, Jang KH, Yang HC, Oh KB, Lee HS, Shin JH. Bithiazole metabolites from the myxobacterium Myxococcus fulvus. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007;55:477–479. [PubMed]
47. Lee LS, Dunn JJ, De Lucca AJ, Ciegler A. Role of lactone ring of aflatoxin B1 in toxicity and mutagenicity. Experientia. 1981;37:16–17. [PubMed]
48. Bol J, Smith JE. Biotransformation of aflatoxin. Food Biotechnol. 1989;3:127–144.
49. Natural Toxins. Official Methods of Analysis. AOAC; Washington, DC, USA: 2005. 49.4.01 Aflatoxin B1 in feed; pp. 37–40.

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)