PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Neurotherapeutics. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 2.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2996269
NIHMSID: NIHMS87069

Multifunctional Drug Treatment in Neurotrauma

SUMMARY

Although the concepts of secondary injury and neuroprotection after neurotrauma are well-supported experimentally, clinical trials of neuroprotective agents in traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury have been disappointing. Most strategies to date have used drugs directed toward a single pathophysiological mechanism that contributes to early necrotic cell death. Given these failures, recent research has increasingly focused on multifunctional (multipotential, pluripotential) agents that target multiple injury mechanisms, particularly those that occur later after the insult. Here we review two such approaches that show particular promise in experimental neurotrauma — cell cycle inhibitors and small cyclized peptides. Both show extended therapeutic windows for treatment and appear to share at least one important target.

Keywords: Neurotrauma, neuroprotection, treatment, cell cycle inhibitors, small cyclized peptides

Introduction

Trauma to the central nervous system (CNS) causes both direct tissue damage and more delayed biochemical changes that lead to cell loss (secondary injury), demyelination and related functional deficits.1 Initiation of such biochemical cascades occurs from minutes to weeks after the insult. Numerous factors associated with delayed tissue loss have been identified from experimental studies of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI); these include products of lipid degradation, disrupted ionic homeostasis, altered neurotransmitter release and receptor function, and inflammatory and immune changes.13 Together, these biochemical and associated metabolic effects result in loss of neuronal and oligodendroglial cells, reactive astrogliosis, and proliferation/activation of microglia.4,5

Most neuroprotective strategies have been directed at individual components of this delayed reactive cascade, such as reducing free radical-induced actions, excitotoxicity or inflammation. Whereas many such strategies have proven effective in experimental animal models of TBI or SCI, they have shown little or no neuroprotective actions in humans.2 However, the majority of clinical neuroprotective approaches to date have been directed at reducing neuronal necrosis – a relatively early event that is largely completed within 6–8 h.6 Yet only a relative minority of patients with neurotrauma can have treatment initiated within this time period. In addition, most therapies have aimed at modifying single components of the complex secondary injury cascade, even though it is recognized that many autodestructive biochemical changes occur in parallel. Use of multiple drug treatments, each directed to a different secondary injury component, has rarely been attempted, even experimentally, in neurotrauma,7 although multifactorial combination drug approaches have long been standard therapy for certain infectious diseases and cancers. However, even if such combination treatments showed promise in animal models, the methodological difficulties and costs associated with such multi-drug comparison studies in treating clinical neurotrauma would likely prove prohibitive.

An alternative approach would be to identify single agents that can modify diverse secondary injury cascades. A number of such multifunctional or multipotential treatments has been proposed and successfully tested in experimental neurotrauma models. These have included naturally occurring substances such as thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH), progesterone, heat shock protein, neurotrophic factors and erythropoietin; drugs developed for other disorders such as statins or antibiotics; and agents developed through rational drug design.2

We have developed two multifunctional treatment approaches that have proved to be remarkably effective for the treatment of TBI and/or SCI. One has been developed through a rational drug design program and based upon the tripeptide hormone TRH. The other has adapted drugs used extensively in experimental oncology, with targets based upon data developed from extensive genomics profiling in experimental TBI and SCI.

TRH and Novel TRH Analogues

In the early 1980s, we demonstrated that TRH – when used at higher than physiological concentrations – markedly improved outcome after experimental SCI, with a therapeutic window of at least 24 h.8,9 TRH inhibits multiple secondary injury factors or processes, including declines of blood flow and bioenergetics, lipid degradation products such as peptidyl leukotrienes and platelet activating factor, ionic dyshomeostasis (Na+, K+, Ca++, Mg++), endogenous opioids and excitotoxins.1012 Subsequently, we found that TRH analogues that modified either the N-terminal or the middle amino acid of this tri-peptide hormone (pyroglamyl- histidyl- prolineamide) were even more effective than TRH, with longer biological half-lives and fewer undesirable physiological actions. Such analogues proved highly effective in improving functional recovery and reducing lesion volume after experimental SCI or TBI.1317 The neuroprotective actions of TRH and TRH analogues in experimental neurotrauma have subsequently been confirmed by many laboratories.1822 Moreover, a small clinical trial of TRH suggested protective effects after SCI.23

TRH is metabolized through two major pathways: endopeptidase cleavage of pyrogluamyl to produce cyclo-histidyly-proline diketopiperazine (CHP) or deamidation yielding the free acid form of TRH.24,25 Various TRH analogues have been developed that modify one of its amino acids (Fig. 1).26 Pyroglutamyl substitutions limit endopeptidase-mediated metabolism, resulting in compounds that have far longer biological half-lives than TRH (6–8 h versus 5 min); some of these are also more potent than TRH in terms of central nervous system (CNS) activity. For example, YM-14673 is longer acting than TRH (8–36 times) and much more potent (10–100 times).15 However, N-terminal substitutions retain the other physiological actions of TRH – endocrine, autonomic and analeptic. We have also evaluated modifications of the histidyl residue (imidazole substitution); certain substitutions reduced the cardiovascular and/or endocrine activity while maintaining the neuroprotective actions of TRH (Fig. 2).27 Critically, modification of the C-terminus results in compounds devoid of neuroprotective activity, although they retain endocrine, autonomic and analeptic activity similar to TRH.

Figure 1
Comparison of TRH and various substituted TRH analogues that retain the endocrine, autonomic, and analeptic actions of TRH
Figure 2
Comparison of the physiological actions of novel TRH analogues that modify the imidazole structure

Based upon these observations, we developed dual-substituted TRH analogues (modifications at both the N-terminal and histidyl moieties). Such compounds (53a, 57a) have limited endocrine, autonomic and analeptic effects while preserving or enhancing the neuroprotective actions (Fig. 2).16, 26 Compound 53a is at least two orders of magnitude more hydrophobic than either TRH or YM-14673, based upon their partition coefficients between n-octanol and water (logP); thus it should have enhanced cellular permeability to the CNS.16

Cyclic Dipeptides

TRH is metabolized to a cyclic dipeptide (CHP), which, like other diketopiperazines, retains considerable physiological activity.28 We have developed a series of diketopiperazines structurally related to CHP (Fig. 3).29 One of these (35b) has been extensively examined using in vitro and in vivo model systems.2932 In neuronal cell culture models, 35b provides neuroprotection in necrotic cell death models (maitotoxin, glutamate, mechanical injury), as well as in apoptotic cell death models (staurosporine, beta amyloid) (Fig. 4).31 Given intravenously, 35b reduced lesion volume by nearly 70%. It also improved functional (cognitive and motor) outcomes after either fluid percussion-induced traumatic brain injury (FPI) in rats or controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury in mice.30, 31 Treatment also significantly reduced apoptotic cell death in rat hippocampus following FPI. The therapeutic window for the drug is at least 8 h, and it shows a relatively flat dose response for neuroprotection between 0.1 and 10 mg/kg. Optimal doses are between 1 and 3 mg/kg, with repeated dosing over time showing no added benefit as compared to single bolus dose treatment. 35b is currently being developed by RemeGenix, Inc., for clinical trials in head injury.

Figure 3
Chemical structures of the cyclic dipeptides 35b, 144, 606, and 807
Figure 4
Effect of 35b on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in three different in vitro models of cell death: apoptotic death induced by staurosporine (A); necrotic death induced by maitotoxin (B); traumatic death induced by a punch model that produces both ...

Using the NIMH Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, 35b does not have significant binding affinities for any of 50 classical receptors, channels and transporters tested.31 It also does not bind to either high or low affinity TRH receptors. To better address potential mechanisms, we performed temporal profiling using Affymetrix microarrays. Treatment with 35b after FPI up-regulated various endogenous neuroprotective factors (BDNF, HSP 70, HIF1, mGluR7) and down-regulated a number of recognized secondary injury factors (cyclins, calpain, cathepsin).29,32 These findings were confirmed by PCR and protein measurements. Particularly noteworthy were the effects of treatment on cell cycle proteins, whose up-regulation is associated with neuronal apoptosis, astrogliosis and microglial activation after TBI or SCI.33, 34 Administration of 35b suppressed expression of the major upstream cell cycle proteins including cyclin D1, the retinoblastoma protein Rb, and E2F5.29

Various other cyclic dipeptides reduce lesion volume and improve behavioral outcome after CCI in mice, with effects that are similar to those of 35b (Fig. 5).29 In compound 606 the histidine moiety was replaced by 3,5-di-tert-butyltyrosine (DBT), a phenolic amino acid that can trap reactive oxygen species. In contrast to 35b, 606 blocked free radical-mediated cell death in neuronal cultures induced by FeSO4. Compound 144 also showed substantial neuroprotective actions in vitro and was highly protective in both the FPI and CCI models (Fig. 5).29

Figure 5
A. Comparison of effects of diketopiperazines 35b, 144, 606 and 807 on motor function measured by beam walk test at 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days post-trauma. All diketopiperazines significantly ( p<0.001) improved motor function at 14 and 21 days ...

Cell Cycle Gene and Protein Expression after TBI or SCI

Progression through the cell cycle is carefully regulated through the interplay of a number of cell cycle-related proteins, including cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and CDK inhibitors. Early events include the synthesis of cyclin D, which binds to CDK4 and CDK6; in the nucleus, CDK4/6 phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), leading to release of E2F transcription factors and transition to G1.35, 36 Apoptosis and cell cycle pathways share several common regulatory elements, including the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), E2F, and p53.

From extensive temporal profiling studies of gene expression changes following rodent SCI,37,38 we identified a cluster of cell cycle genes that were coordinately regulated with the oncogene c-myc, which has been linked to neuronal cell death.37,39 These gene expression changes, detected using Affymetrix chips (Fig. 6), were confirmed using RT-PCR, Western blots and immunocytochemistry.34,37,38 Importantly, up-regulated cell cycle proteins include key upstream regulatory elements that lead to G1 transition – including cyclin D1, Rb and E2F5. Injury is also associated with down-regulation of endogenous cell cycle inhibitors such as p27.

Figure 6
Functional clustering of cell cycle genes shows high expression 4 to 24 h after injury. Functional clustering of genes based on involvement in cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Genes of this functional cluster also belong to smaller temporal clusters ...

It is known that up-regulation of cell cycle proteins in post-mitotic cells such as neurons or oligodendroglia results in caspase-mediated cell death.40 Consistent with this view, we found that increased cell cycle expression in neurons was associated with active caspase 3 expression and/or TUNEL positive staining after TBI 33,40 or SCI37 (Fig. 7). Up-regulation of cell cycle proteins is also readily observed in primary neuronal culture models following stimulation of caspase-dependent apoptosis with ceramide,41 β-amyloid,42 KCl withdrawal,43 or DNA damage.4446 In addition, kainic acid-induced excitotoxicity of cerebellar granule cells is associated with increased expression of cyclins D and E, PCNA and E2F1, as well as with increased expression of caspases 3 and 9.47 Similarly, trophic withdrawal-induced cell death is associated with increased expression of both cyclins and cyclin dependent kinases.48

Figure 7
Immunofluorescence shows the expression of cyclin D1 and active caspase 3 in cortical neurons after TBI, and effects of flavopiridol treatment

SCI and TBI cause active astrogliosis that causes glial scar formation and proliferation/activation of microglia. After injury, cell cycle proteins are highly expressed in GFAP positive cells, as well as in activated microglia. For example, cyclin D1 expression is found to be increased in microglia after transient forebrain ischemia in the rat49 and global ischemia in the gerbil.50 Astrocyte proliferation was also associated with increased cell cycle proteins after ischemia.50 Following SCI, microglia and astrocytes demonstrate a marked reduction in p27, an endogenous cell cycle inhibitor.51 Up-regulation of cell cycle proteins is observed in primary cell culture models, including astroglial proliferation after exposure to serum52 or microglial proliferation/activation following exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS).53 Following CNS injury, astrocytes undergo rapid proliferation and contribute to the formation of the glial scar.54 This scar may provide a physical barrier to axonal growth55 as well as a ‘wall’ to prevent migration of inflammatory cells into undamaged tissue.56,57 Microglia, the primary immunological cell in the CNS, undergo rapid proliferation and transition from a resting, ramified phenotype to an ameboid phagocytic phenotype that is nearly indistinguishable from infiltrating macrophages.58 Activated microglia produce pro-inflammatory molecules such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL6, inducible nitric oxide synthase,59 complement components60 and reactive oxygen species,61 which serve to modify both secondary injury and endogenous neuroprotective responses.

Increases in cell cycle protein expression have also been reported in chronic neurodegenerative disorders. For example, both neurons and glia show increased PCNA and cyclin D expression in human Alzheimer’s patients.62,63 Furthermore, DNA replication has been identified in apoptotic neurons in human Alzheimer’s patients.64 In an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease, genetic APP23 mice demonstrate an increase of cell cycle-related proteins in astrocytes.65

Inhibition of Cell Cycle

Cell cycle inhibitors have been developed and extensively evaluated in experimental cancer models, and several have been tested in humans. The best characterized and studied among these are flavopiridol, a semi-synthetic flavonoid derived from rohitukin bark 66, and the purine analogues roscovitine and olomoucine.67 Flavopiridol blocks all the CDKs and also inhibits the transcription of cyclin D1.68, 69 In contrast, the purine analogues preferentially inhibit CDK 2 and CDK5, although at higher concentrations they may inhibit other kinases.70

Each of these agents shows neuroprotection in vitro, such as against etoposide-induced neuronal apoptosis 33 or apoptosis of cerebellar granule cells following KCl withdrawal.43 Moreover, olomoucine inhibits hypoxia-induced neuronal cell death in culture,71,whereas flavopiridol inhibits kainite-mediated or colchicines-mediated apoptotic cell death.72, 73 A recent study in our laboratory determined that inhibition of multiple cyclin-dependent kinases reduces etoposide-induced neuronal apoptosis, including CDK1 and CDK4.74

Cell cycle inhibitors show inhibitory effects on the proliferation and activation of mitotic cells, such as microglia and astrocytes in vitro. For example, stimulation of microglia with LPS induces proliferation. Pre-treatment of microglia with cell cycle inhibitors, such as flavopiridol or roscovitine, for 1 h prior to the addition of LPS results in a significant suppression of microglial proliferation 33 and nitric oxide production.74 Importantly, roscovitine treatment of microglial cells stimulated with LPS reduced microglial-induced neurotoxicity.74 Similarly, proliferation of astrocytes induced by the addition of 10% serum was completely inhibited by flavopiridol.33

In vivo, cell cycle inhibition using pharmacological approaches has shown neuroprotective effects. For example, early treatment with flavopiridol, administered centrally, showed remarkable neuroprotection after FPI in rats.40 Lesion volume was reduced by approximately 70% and chronic behavioral recovery (motor and cognitive) was indistinguishable from sham-injured controls. Caspase-mediated neuronal cell death after TBI was nearly completely attenuated. In addition to neuroprotection, significant effects on mitotic cells were also observed. GFAP expression and markers of microglial activation were markedly reduced. These changes were associated with near complete suppression of cell cycle proteins in neurons, astroglia and microglia, respectively.40 Delayed administration of flavopiridol was similarly found to have neuroprotective effects. In a follow up study, flavopiridol was administered centrally at 30 min or 4 h after FPI, or systemically (intraperitoneally) at 24 h after FPI;33 each of these treatments resulted in markedly reduced lesion volumes – approximately 90%, 50% and 60%, respectively (Fig. 8).

Figure 8
Effect of flavopiridol on lateral fluid percussion-induced lesion volume 21 days after injury in the rat

The more specific cell cycle inhibitor roscovitine, which does not have potentially confusing effects on gene transcription, has similar actions after FPI. Administration of roscovitine 30 min after FPI resulted in highly significant reductions in lesion volume and improved behavioral outcome (motor and cognitive). This cell cycle inhibitor also reduced astrogliosis and produced a marked inhibition of microglial activation-related inflammation74 (Fig. 9).

Figure 9
Roscovitine treatment decreases activation of microglia and astroglia at 7 days after injury, as indicated by immunostaining for p22PHOX and GFAP

Research in SCI confirms the strong beneficial effects of treatment with cell cycle inhibitors. We have shown that flavopiridol treatment – administered centrally by mini-osmotic pump beginning 30 min post-trauma and continuing over 7 days – significantly improved motor recovery and reduced lesion volume at 28 days.34 Treatment reduced cell cycle protein induction in neurons and astrocytes; this reduction was associated with decreased cleaved caspase-3 labeling in neurons and oligodendrocytes, as well as reduction in glial scar. Neuronal loss, measured by MAP-2 staining, was alleviated by flavopiridol treatment, and tissue loss overall was significantly reduced. Further, treatment with the cell cycle inhibitor markedly limited microglial activation and associated inflammatory factors (Figs. 10, ,11).11). The cell cycle inhibitor olomoucine has also been shown to decrease lesion volume and improve function after SCI.75 Reductions in microglial-related inflammation76 and astrocytic scar75 were found with olomoucine treatment, supporting the beneficial effect of cell cycle inhibition after SCI. Preliminary work using cyclin D1 knockout mice subjected to SCI has shown decreased lesion volumes in knockouts as compared to wild type controls, consistent with the pharmacological inhibition studies.34

Figure 10
Cresyl violet staining of tissue sections from flavopiridol- or vehicle-treated spinal cords
Figure 11
Astrocyte and microglial marker immunohistochemistry after injury and treatment

Research in experimental cerebral ischemia is highly consistent with the TBI and SCI studies. Dominant negative CDK4/5 animals show reduced neuronal cell death after focal or global brain ischemia,77 as does treatment with CDK inhibitors.78, 79 Moreover, after focal cerebral ischemia, cyclin D1 knockouts or animals treated with olomoucine show reduced astrocyte proliferation. Excitotoxic cell death following kainic acid administration is attenuated by treatment with anti-sense oligonucleotides directed against CDK4 or cyclin D1.

Summary

Activation of cell cycle proteins in the CNS causes proliferation of mitotic cells such as astroglia or microglia, but induces apoptosis in post-mitotic cells such as neurons or oligodendroglia. Acute injuries to the CNS, including TBI and SCI, cause up-regulation of many cell cycle proteins in both mitotic and post-mitotic cells. These changes cause neuronal and oligodendroglial cell death, astroglial scar formation and proliferation/activation of microglia with the release of associated inflammatory factors. Treatment with cell cycle inhibitors results in striking neuroprotection, likely related to its multifunctional actions on these diverse cell types. Because cell cycle proteins have such diverse effects, even selective inhibitors of these pathways may serve as multifunctional neuroprotective agents.

Another approach to multi-potential drug treatment of CNS injury is to use compounds that modulate different signal transduction pathways that are involved in secondary injury. TRH is a naturally occurring brain hormone which, when used at higher than physiological levels as a drug, can inhibit many factors and mechanisms implicated in delayed cell death. Thus, TRH and TRH analogues can improve blood flow and bioenergetic state; limit loss of ionic homeostasis; reduce lipid degradation; and inhibit the actions of endogenous opioids, leukotrienes, platelet activating factor and possibly glutamate.29,32 The neuroprotective effects do not appear to be mediated by TRH receptors, as they occur at supraphysiological doses and can be dissociated from the other physiological effects of TRH (endocrine, analeptic, autonomic).

Diketopiperazines that are structurally related to a metabolic product of TRH have marked neuroprotective activity but do not act on either high or low affinity TRH receptors. They also have diverse multifunctional neuroprotective actions. Like cell cycle inhibitors, the prototype compound 35b inhibits the activation of many cell cycle proteins after injury. But they also reduce other known secondary injury factors, including calpains and cathepsins, while up-regulating several well-established endogenous neuroprotective factors including BDNF, HSP 70 and HIF 1. Each of the latter factors has considerable protective activity in animal models. These findings underscore the attractiveness of multifunctional drug approaches for the treatment of neurotrauma and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by NIH grants 5R01NS054221 to AIF.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Yakovlev AG, Faden AI. Mechanisms of neural cell death: implications for development of neuroprotective treatment strategies. NeuroRX. 2004;1:5–16. [PubMed]
2. Faden AI, Stoica B. Neuroprotection: challenges and opportunities. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:794–800. [PubMed]
3. Faden AI. Neuroprotection and traumatic brain injury: theoretical option or realistic proposition. Curr Opin Neurol. 2002;15:707–712. [PubMed]
4. Dumont RJ, Okonkwo DO, Verma S, et al. Acute spinal cord injury, part I: pathophysiologic mechanisms. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2001;24:254–264. [PubMed]
5. Tator CH. Experimental and clinical studies of the pathophysiology and management of acute spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 1996;19:206–214. [PubMed]
6. Olney JW. Excitotoxin-mediated neuron death in youth and old age. Prog Brain Res. 1990;86:37–51. [PubMed]
7. Faden AI. Comparison of single and combination drug treatment strategies in experimental brain trauma. J Neurotrauma. 1993;10:91–100. [PubMed]
8. Faden AI, Jacobs TP, Holaday JW. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone improves neurologic recovery after spinal trauma in cats. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:1063–1067. [PubMed]
9. Faden AI, Jacobs TP, Smith MT. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone in experimental spinal injury: dose response and late treatment. Neurology. 1984;34:1280–1284. [PubMed]
10. Faden AI, Yum SW, Lemke M, Vink R. Effects of TRH-analog treatment on tissue cations, phospholipids and energy metabolism after spinal cord injury. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990;255:608–614. [PubMed]
11. Lux WE, Jr, Feuerstein G, Faden AI. Alteration of leukotriene D4 hypotension by thyrotropin releasing hormone. Nature. 1983;302:822–824. [PubMed]
12. Feuerstein G, Lux WE, Ezra D, Hayes EC, Snyder F, Faden AI. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone blocks the hypotensive effects of platelet–activating factor in the unanesthetized guinea pig. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1985;7:335–340. [PubMed]
13. McIntosh TK, Vink R, Faden AI. An analogue of thyrotropin-releasing hormone improves outcome after brain injury: 31P-NMR studies. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:R785–792. [PubMed]
14. McIntosh TK, Vink R, Faden AI. Beneficial effect of the TRH analog CG-3703 on outcome and survival following traumatic brain injury in rats. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;264:415–420. [PubMed]
15. Faden AI. TRH analog YM-14673 improves outcome following traumatic brain and spinal cord injury in rats: dose-response studies. Brain Res. 1989;486:228–235. [PubMed]
16. Faden AI, Fox GB, Fan L, et al. Novel TRH analog improves motor and cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury in rodents. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:R1196–1204. [PubMed]
17. Faden AI, Sacksen I, Noble LJ. Structure-activity relationships of TRH analogs in rat spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 1988;448:287–293. [PubMed]
18. Wang GL, Zhu C. Effects of thyrotropin-releasing hormone on acute experimental traumatic head injury in cats. Chin Med J (Engl) 1991;104:939–944. [PubMed]
19. Tanaka K, Ogawa N, Asanuma M, Kondo Y. Thyrotropin releasing hormone prevents abnormalities of cortical acetylcholine and monoamines in mice following head injury. Regul Pept. 1997;70:173–178. [PubMed]
20. Arias MJ. Treatment of experimental spinal cord injury with TRH, naloxone, and dexamethasone. Surg Neurol. 1987;28:335–338. [PubMed]
21. Behrmann DL, Bresnahan JC, Beattie MS. Modeling of acute spinal cord injury in the rat: neuroprotection and enhanced recovery with methylprednisolone, U-74006F and YM-14673. Exp Neurol. 1994;126:61–75. [PubMed]
22. Puniak MA, Freeman GM, Agresta CA, Van Newkirk L, Barone CA, Salzman SK. Comparison of a serotonin antagonist, opioid antagonist, and TRH analog for the acute treatment of experimental spinal trauma. J Neurotrauma. 1991;8:193–203. [PubMed]
23. Pitts LH, Ross A, Chase GA, Faden AI. Treatment with thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12:235–243. [PubMed]
24. Friedman TC, Wilk S. Delineation of a particulate thyrotropin-releasing hormone-degrading enzyme in rat brain by the use of specific inhibitors of prolyl endopeptidase and pyroglutamyl peptide hydrolase. J Neurochem. 1986;46:1231–1239. [PubMed]
25. Coggins PJ, McDermott JR, Snell CR, Gibson AM. Thyrotrophin releasing hormone degradation by rat synaptosomal peptidases: production of the metabolite His-Pro. Neuropeptides. 1987;10:147–156. [PubMed]
26. Faden AI, Knoblach SM, Movsesyan VA, Lea PMt, Cernak I. Novel neuroprotective tripeptides and dipeptides. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1053:472–481. [PubMed]
27. Faden AI, Labroo VM, Cohen LA. Imidazole-substituted analogues of TRH limit behavioral deficits after experimental brain trauma. J Neurotrauma. 1993;10:101–108. [PubMed]
28. Prasad C. Limited proteolysis and physiological regulation: an example from thyrotropin-releasing hormone metabolism. Thyroid. 1998;8:969–975. [PubMed]
29. Faden AI, Movsesyan VA, Knoblach SM, Ahmed F, Cernak I. Neuroprotective effects of novel small peptides in vitro and after brain injury. Neuropharmacology. 2005;49:410–424. [PubMed]
30. Faden AI, Fox GB, Di X, et al. Neuroprotective and nootropic actions of a novel cyclized dipeptide after controlled cortical impact injury in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:355–363. [PubMed]
31. Faden AI, Knoblach SM, Cernak I, et al. Novel diketopiperazine enhances motor and cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury in rats and shows neuroprotection in vitro and in vivo. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:342–354. [PubMed]
32. Faden AI, Knoblach SM, Movsesyan VA, Cernak I. Novel small peptides with neuroprotective and nootropic properties. J Alzheimers Dis. 2004;6:S93–97. [PubMed]
33. Cernak I, Stoica B, Byrnes KR, Di Giovanni S, Faden AI. Role of the cell cycle in the pathobiology of central nervous system trauma. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1286–1293. [PubMed]
34. Byrnes KR, Stoica BA, Fricke S, Di Giovanni S, Faden AI. Cell cycle activation contributes to post-mitotic cell death and secondary damage after spinal cord injury. Brain. 2007;130:2977–2992. [PubMed]
35. Kitagawa M, Higashi H, Jung HK, et al. The consensus motif for phosphorylation by cyclin D1-Cdk4 is different from that for phosphorylation by cyclin A/E-Cdk2. Embo J. 1996;15:7060–7069. [PubMed]
36. Sears RC, Nevins JR. Signaling networks that link cell proliferation and cell fate. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:11617–11620. [PubMed]
37. Di Giovanni S, Knoblach SM, Brandoli C, Aden SA, Hoffman EP, Faden AI. Gene profiling in spinal cord injury shows role of cell cycle in neuronal death. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:454–468. [PubMed]
38. De Biase A, Knoblach SM, Di Giovanni S, et al. Gene expression profiling of experimental traumatic spinal cord injury as a function of distance from impact site and injury severity. Physiol Genomics. 2005;22:368–381. [PubMed]
39. Kangas A, Nicholson DW, Holtta E. Involvement of CPP32/Caspase-3 in c-Myc-induced apoptosis. Oncogene. 1998;16:387–398. [PubMed]
40. Di Giovanni S, Movsesyan V, Ahmed F, et al. Cell cycle inhibition provides neuroprotection and reduces glial proliferation and scar formation after traumatic brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:8333–8338. [PubMed]
41. Strazza M, Luddi A, Brogi A, et al. Activation of cell cycle regulatory proteins in the apoptosis of terminally differentiated oligodendrocytes. Neurochem Res. 2004;29:923–931. [PubMed]
42. Giovanni A, Wirtz-Brugger F, Keramaris E, Slack R, Park DS. Involvement of cell cycle elements, cyclin-dependent kinases, pRb, and E2F x DP, in B-amyloid-induced neuronal death. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:19011–19016. [PubMed]
43. Padmanabhan J, Park DS, Greene LA, Shelanski ML. Role of cell cycle regulatory proteins in cerebellar granule neuron apoptosis. J Neurosci. 1999;19:8747–8756. [PubMed]
44. Otsuka Y, Tanaka T, Uchida D, et al. Roles of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and p53 in neuronal cell death induced by doxorubicin on cerebellar granule neurons in mouse. Neurosci Lett. 2004;365:180–185. [PubMed]
45. Kruman, Wersto RP, Cardozo-Pelaez F, et al. Cell cycle activation linked to neuronal cell death initiated by DNA damage. Neuron. 2004;41:549–561. [PubMed]
46. Park DS, Morris EJ, Bremner R, et al. Involvement of retinoblastoma family members and E2F/DP complexes in the death of neurons evoked by DNA damage. J Neurosci. 2000;20:3104–3114. [PubMed]
47. Park DS, Obeidat A, Giovanni A, Greene LA. Cell cycle regulators in neuronal death evoked by excitotoxic stress: implications for neurodegeneration and its treatment. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:771–781. [PubMed]
48. Park DS, Levine B, Ferrari G, Greene LA. Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors and dominant negative cyclin dependent kinase 4 and 6 promote survival of NGF-deprived sympathetic neurons. J Neurosci. 1997;17:8975–8983. [PubMed]
49. Wiessner C, Brink I, Lorenz P, Neumann-Haefelin T, Vogel P, Yamashita K. Cyclin D1 messenger RNA is induced in microglia rather than neurons following transient forebrain ischaemia. Neuroscience. 1996;72:947–958. [PubMed]
50. Kato H, Takahashi A, Itoyama Y. Cell cycle protein expression in proliferating microglia and astrocytes following transient global cerebral ischemia in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 2003;60:215–221. [PubMed]
51. Shen A, Liu Y, Zhao J, et al. Temporal-spatial expressions of p27kip1 and its phosphorylation on Serine-10 after acute spinal cord injury in adult rat: Implications for post-traumatic glial proliferation. Neurochem Int. 2008;52:1266–1275. [PubMed]
52. Tanaka T, Tatsuno I, Noguchi Y, et al. Activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) in growth-stimulated rat astrocytes. Geranylgeranylated Rho small GTPase(s) are essential for the induction of cyclin E gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:26772–26778. [PubMed]
53. Lee SC, Liu W, Brosnan CF, Dickson DW. GM-CSF promotes proliferation of human fetal and adult microglia in primary cultures. Glia. 1994;12:309–318. [PubMed]
54. Hoke A, Silver J. Heterogeneity among astrocytes in reactive gliosis. Perspect Dev Neurobiol. 1994;2:269–274. [PubMed]
55. Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:146–156. [PubMed]
56. Ridet JL, Malhotra SK, Privat A, Gage FH. Reactive astrocytes: cellular and molecular cues to biological function. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:570–577. [PubMed]
57. Faulkner JR, Herrmann JE, Woo MJ, Tansey KE, Doan NB, Sofroniew MV. Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2004;24:2143–2155. [PubMed]
58. Raivich G, Jones LL, Werner A, Bluthmann H, Doetschmann T, Kreutzberg GW. Molecular signals for glial activation: pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the injured brain. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1999;73:21–30. [PubMed]
59. Benveniste EN. Inflammatory cytokines within the central nervous system: sources, function, and mechanism of action. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:C1–16. [PubMed]
60. Lynch NJ, Willis CL, Nolan CC, et al. Microglial activation and increased synthesis of complement component C1q precedes blood-brain barrier dysfunction in rats. Mol Immunol. 2004;40:709–716. [PubMed]
61. Pawate S, Shen Q, Fan F, Bhat NR. Redox regulation of glial inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide and interferongamma. J Neurosci Res. 2004;77:540–551. [PubMed]
62. Wharton SB, Williams GH, Stoeber K, et al. Expression of Ki67, PCNA and the chromosome replication licensing protein Mcm2 in glial cells of the ageing human hippocampus increases with the burden of Alzheimer-type pathology. Neurosci Lett. 2005;383:33–38. [PubMed]
63. Yang Y, Mufson EJ, Herrup K. Neuronal cell death is preceded by cell cycle events at all stages of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2003;23:2557–2563. [PubMed]
64. Yang Y, Geldmacher DS, Herrup K. DNA replication precedes neuronal cell death in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2001;21:2661–2668. [PubMed]
65. Gartner U, Bruckner MK, Krug S, Schmetsdorf S, Staufenbiel M, Arendt T. Amyloid deposition in APP23 mice is associated with the expression of cyclins in astrocytes but not in neurons. Acta Neuropathol. 2003;106:535–544. [PubMed]
66. Newcomb EW. Flavopiridol: pleiotropic biological effects enhance its anti-cancer activity. Anticancer Drugs. 2004;15:411–419. [PubMed]
67. Meijer L, Raymond E. Roscovitine and other purines as kinase inhibitors. From starfish oocytes to clinical trials. Acc Chem Res. 2003;36:417–425. [PubMed]
68. Dai Y, Grant S. Small molecule inhibitors targeting cyclin–dependent kinases as anticancer agents. Curr Oncol Rep. 2004;6:123–130. [PubMed]
69. Swanton C. Cell-cycle targeted therapies. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5:27–36. [PubMed]
70. Abraham RT, Acquarone M, Andersen A, et al. Cellular effects of olomoucine, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases. Biol Cell. 1995;83:105–120. [PubMed]
71. Bossenmeyer-Pourie C, Chihab R, Schroeder H, Daval JL. Transient hypoxia may lead to neuronal proliferation in the developing mammalian brain: from apoptosis to cell cycle completion. Neuroscience. 1999;91:221–231. [PubMed]
72. Jorda EG, Verdaguer E, Canudas AM, et al. Neuroprotective action of flavopiridol, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, in colchicine-induced apoptosis. Neuropharmacology. 2003;45:672–683. [PubMed]
73. Verdaguer E, Jimenez A, Canudas AM, et al. Inhibition of cell cycle pathway by flavopiridol promotes survival of cerebellar granule cells after an excitotoxic treatment. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;308:609–616. [PubMed]
74. Hilton GD, Stoica BA, Byrnes KR, Faden AI. Roscovitine reduces neuronal loss, glial activation, and neurologic deficits after brain trauma. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Tian DS, Yu ZY, Xie MJ, Bu BT, Witte OW, Wang W. Suppression of astroglial scar formation and enhanced axonal regeneration associated with functional recovery in a spinal cord injury rat model by the cell cycle inhibitor olomoucine. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:1053–1063. [PubMed]
76. Tian DS, Dong Q, Pan DJ, et al. Attenuation of astrogliosis by suppressing of microglial proliferation with the cell cycle inhibitor olomoucine in rat spinal cord injury model. Brain Res. 2007;1154:206–214. [PubMed]
77. Rashidian J, Iyirhiaro G, Aleyasin H, et al. Multiple cyclin-dependent kinases signals are critical mediators of ischemia/hypoxic neuronal death in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14080–14085. [PubMed]
78. Wang F, Corbett D, Osuga H, et al. Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases improves CA1 neuronal survival and behavioral performance after global ischemia in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:171–182. [PubMed]
79. Osuga H, Osuga S, Wang F, et al. Cyclin–dependent kinases as a therapeutic target for stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:10254–10259. [PubMed]