PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of ijerphMDPI Open Access JournalsMDPI Open Access JournalsThis articleThis JournalInstructions for authorsAdd your e-mail address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal
 
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 October; 7(10): 3760–3791.
Published online 2010 October 21. doi:  10.3390/ijerph7103760
PMCID: PMC2996190

Chronic Cigarette Smoking: Implications for Neurocognition and Brain Neurobiology

Abstract

Compared to the substantial volume of research on the general health consequences associated with chronic smoking, little research has been specifically devoted to the investigation of its effects on human neurobiology and neurocognition. This review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature on the neurocognitive and neurobiological implications of chronic cigarette smoking in cohorts that were not seeking treatment for substance use or psychiatric disorders. Studies that specifically assessed the neurocognitive or neurobiological (with emphasis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance-based neuroimaging studies) consequences of chronic smoking are highlighted. Chronic cigarette smoking appears to be associated with deficiencies in executive functions, cognitive flexibility, general intellectual abilities, learning and/or memory processing speed, and working memory. Chronic smoking is related to global brain atrophy and to structural and biochemical abnormalities in anterior frontal regions, subcortical nuclei and commissural white matter. Chronic smoking may also be associated with an increased risk for various forms of neurodegenerative diseases. The existing literature is limited by inconsistent accounting for potentially confounding biomedical and psychiatric conditions, focus on cross-sectional studies with middle aged and older adults and the absence of studies concurrently assessing neurocognitive, neurobiological and genetic factors in the same cohort. Consequently, the mechanisms promoting the neurocognitive and neurobiological abnormalities reported in chronic smokers are unclear. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine if the smoking-related neurobiological and neurocognitive abnormalities increase over time and/or show recovery with sustained smoking cessation.

Keywords: chronic cigarette smoking, neurocognition, neurobiology, neuroimaging, genetics

1. Introduction

Approximately 2 billion people worldwide use tobacco products, mostly in the form of cigarettes, with tobacco smoking-related diseases resulting in 4 million deaths per year [1]. Among the approximately 64.5 million active smokers in the USA, smoking-related disease results in approximately 440,000 preventable annual deaths [2]. The enormous healthcare expenditures and mortality associated with chronic cigarette smoking results in an estimated $92 billion annual productivity loss in the US. Internationally, the greatest smoking related mortality is increasingly apparent among economically disadvantaged groups, which, in the US includes a disproportionate number of ethnic minorities and those with psychiatric and substance use disorders [3,4]. An extensive body of research thoroughly describes the deleterious effects of chronic cigarette smoking on human cardiac and pulmonary function, peripheral vascular systems as well as its carcinogenic properties [58]. Recent research indicates chronic cigarette smoking is associated with increased risk for numerous biomedical conditions that may directly or indirectly compromise brain neurobiology and neurocognition [912]. However, compared to the substantial volume of research on the cardiovascular, pulmonary and cancer-related health consequences associated with chronic smoking, surprisingly little research has been specifically devoted to the investigation of its effects on human neurocognition and brain neurobiology.

This review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature on the neurocognitive and neurobiological repercussions of chronic cigarette smoking in cohorts and population-based samples that were not specifically seeking treatment for substance use or psychiatric disorders. Prospective or retrospective studies that expressly assessed the neurocognitive or neurobiological consequences of chronic smoking are targeted. Research employing proton magnetic resonance-based studies of brain morphology and metabolites that specifically evaluated the neurobiological consequences of chronic smoking are emphasized. In this review, non-smoking control groups are referred to as NSC and individuals comprising these groups generally were indicated to be never smokers or consumed less than 100 cigarettes over lifetime. NSC were equivalent in age to smoking cohorts unless otherwise specified. The research reviewed was generally conducted with individuals in one of three age ranges: 18–30, 40–59 and 60–90. Individuals 18–30 years of age are referred to as “young adults”, 40–59 as “middle-aged adults” and 60–90 years of age as “older adults”. In studies where the participants do not conform to the above defined age groups, specific age ranges are provided. For reviews on the effects of chronic smoking on brain neurobiology and function in alcohol and substance use disorders see [1315]. Please refer to [1620] for thorough reviews on the acute effects of nicotine administration and nicotine withdrawal on brain neurobiology and neurocognition (although not the focus of this review, these topics are briefly addressed in Section 4). For inclusive reviews on functional MRI and nuclear imaging findings in chronic smokers see [21,22].

2. Neurocognitive Consequences of Chronic Cigarette Smoking (see Table 1)

Table 1.
Neurocognitive studies of chronic smoking in adults (sorted by age group, then year of publication).

The vast majority of research investigating the neurocognitive consequences of chronic cigarette smoking is cross-sectional in design and focused primarily on middle-aged and older adults. In the sole study of adolescents, daily smokers (mean age = 17 ± 1) showed deficits in accuracy of working memory relative to NSC, with individuals who began smoking at a younger age demonstrating greater impairment than those who began smoking at a later age [23]. In the few studies with young adults, smokers were inferior to NSC on measures of sustained attention and impulse control [24], auditory-verbal memory, oral arithmetic, and receptive and expressive vocabulary [25], information processing speed [26] and general intelligence [27]. On an experimental behavioral measure of risk-taking (Balloon Analogue Risk Task [28]), young adults smokers demonstrated higher levels of risk-taking [29]. In cross-sectional studies specifically comparing NSC to middle-aged and/or older adult smokers, poorer performance in smokers was reported for auditory-verbal learning and/or memory [3034], working memory [26,35,36], executive functions [33,37,38], general intellectual abilities [39], visual search speed [40], processing speed and cognitive flexibility [3032,38,41,42] and global cognitive function (e.g., brief mental status examinations such as the MMSE) [41]. In a middle-aged cohort of combined current and former smokers, any history of smoking was associated with increased risk for abnormal auditory-verbal memory [43]. Some studies observed the performance of former smokers fell between that of current smokers and NSC in young [25], middle-aged and older adults [31,35,39]. Other studies found no differences between former smokers and NSC [25,30]. The inconsistencies among these studies may be related to the substantial variety of measures used across studies to evaluate the domain of functioning in question as well as inconsistency in the magnitude of neurocognitive dysfunction in the smoking study cohort.

In cross-sectional population-based studies with community-dwelling older adults, where smoking status (i.e., current smoker, past smoker, never smoker) was used as a prospective or retrospective predictor, current smoking [4446] and any history of smoking [47] were associated with poorer performances on measures of global cognitive function. Any previous smoking history (with variable lengths of smoking cessation) was associated with poorer cognitive flexibility [45], and impaired general cognitive function [44] or, conversely, decreased risk of global cognitive impairment [46]. Chronic smoking in older adults has also been associated with a diminished ability to execute some activities of daily living [48] and compromised postural stability [49].

Longitudinal research with non-demented, population-based samples found that current cigarette smokers demonstrated an abnormal rate of decline on indices of reasoning [43] and auditory-verbal memory [40] in middle aged adults, and abnormal decline on measures of global cognitive function [47,5053] and auditory-verbal memory in older adults [54].

Sex effects in neurocognition among smokers have also been addressed in some studies. Edelstein et al. [34] found no differences between older adult male smokers and male NSC on measures of global cognitive functioning, set-shifting, semantic fluency and auditory-verbal and visuospatial learning and memory, while older adult female smokers demonstrated poorer global cognitive functioning and auditory-verbal memory than female NSC. Jacobsen and colleagues [23] reported that male adolescent smokers performed more poorly than did female smokers on measures of selective and divided attention. Similarly, Razani and colleagues [37] observed that sex was a significant predictor of non-verbal abstraction in currently smoking older adults, however, no interactions were reported among sex, smoking status or smoking severity. Other studies, however, have found no sex effects on neurocognition in middle aged and older adults [32,33,39].

The level and chronicity of smoking, as reflected in the number of cigarettes smoked per day, duration of smoking over lifetime, and/or dose-duration (i.e., pack-years) were inversely related to various domains of neurocognition in adults across a wide age range [25,30,32,45,52,55,56]. Several reports indicate chronic smoking is associated with increased risk for various forms of dementia, in particular Alzheimer’s Disease and vascular dementia [5761]. This risk may be modulated through the apolipoprotein E epsilon4 (ApoE4) genotype, a known genetic risk for the development of Alzheimer’s Disease [52,54]. Interestingly, some studies have reported that risk for development of Alzheimer’s Disease was greater in smokers who were not ApoE4 carriers [52,54,58,59].

Several studies, smoking status (i.e., smoker or non-smoker) or measures of smoking consumption (e.g., pack years), showed weak or no relationships to specific neurocognitive functions (e.g., measures of learning and memory, mental arithmetic, verbal fluency, processing speed), global neurocognitive function (e.g., MMSE) and neurocognitive decline in young and middle aged adults [62,63] and in large community-based samples consisting of middle-aged and older adults [6470].

3. Neurobiological Consequences of Chronic Cigarette Smoking (See Table 2)

Table 2.
Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance neuroimaging studies of chronic smoking in adults (sorted by imaging modality, then age group).

The specific neurobiological factors underlying the reported smoking-related cognitive deficits are not established. However, there are a few of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)-based studies that suggest the reported neurocognitive deficiencies in smokers may be, in part, mediated by abnormalities in brain morphology, perfusion and/or neurochemistry. The majority of these studies are cross-sectional in design.

3.1. Brain Morphology

Computed tomography (CT) studies with cohorts ranging from middle-aged to older adults report that chronic smoking is associated with an abnormal increase of global brain atrophy with advancing age [7477]. These CT studies assessed whole brain volumes and did not report major anatomical subdivisions (e.g., frontal gray matter/white matter). An early MRI study with older adults examined global brain atrophy over a 5-year-interval and found higher pack years was related to increased ventricular volume in men and was associated with increased sulcal volume in women, after controlling for age and vascular risk factors [78]. More recent MRI studies have employed voxel-based morphological measures to assess the regional brain volumes and densities of the cortical gray matter (GM). Smokers aged 39.5 ± 10.3 years evidenced smaller volumes and lower tissue densities than did NSC in bilateral anterior frontal lobe regions; smokers also had smaller volume of the left dorsal cingulate cortex and lower GM density in the cerebellum. Anterior frontal cortex density was inversely related to pack-years [79]. Smokers aged 30.8 ± 7.5 years demonstrated widespread GM volume and density reductions relative to NSC [80], particularly in the bilateral frontal lobes, cingulate gyrus and insula. Non-demented older adult smokers (75.0 ± 3.4 years of age) exhibited reduced GM density in right precuneus, left posterior cingulate gyrus, right thalamus and bilateral precentral and middle frontal gyri compared to NSC [81].

A MR-based study employed diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and voxel based morphometry to assess microstructural integrity and morphology, respectively, of the corpus callosum in middle aged chronic smokers [82]. Contrary to expectations, smokers demonstrated higher fractional anisotropy (FA; higher FA values are considered to reflect greater microstructural integrity [83,84]) in the body and total corpus callosum than did NSC and no volume differences were observed between smokers and NSC in the corpus callosum. However, smokers with high levels of nicotine dependence (as reflected by scores on the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence) had significantly lower FA values than both smokers with low levels of nicotine dependence and NSC. It is widely recognized from population-based studies, with middle-aged and older adults, that chronic smoking is associated with increased incidence of regional white matter (WM) signal hyperintensities on standard MR imaging (e.g., T2-weighted and FLAIR) [8589]. WM hyperintensities are associated with decreased cerebral blood perfusion [90,91] and neurocognitive dysfunction [92,93]. Overall, the degree of smoking-related morphological changes observed appears to be contingent on the method and brain region under consideration.

3.2. Brain Biochemistry

A single volume proton (1H) MR spectroscopy study with chronic smokers (36 ± 11 years of age) observed lower N-acetylaspartate (NAA) concentration (surrogate marker of neuronal integrity [94,95]), in the left hippocampus relative to NSC. No group differences were observed for NAA in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), but choline-containing compound (Cho) levels (a marker of cell membrane turnover/synthesis [94,96]) were positively related to greater pack years in this region [97]. A single voxel 1H spectroscopy study of glutamate levels in the left hippocampus and ACC observed no differences among current smokers (35 ± 10 years of age), former smokers (42 ± 10 years of age) abstinent for 17 ± 3 years and NSC (33 ± 10 years of age) [98]. In the sole 1H spectroscopy study investigating gamma aminobutyric acid levels (GABA; neuromodulator involved in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders [99101]) in chronic smokers, cortical GABA concentrations were lower in female smokers (and modulated by menstrual cycle phase), but GABA levels were not different between male smokers and NSC [102].

3.3. Brain Perfusion

The vast majority of neuroimaging research on brain perfusion has investigated the effects of acute nicotine exposure, rather than the consequences of chronic cigarette smoking [18]. The few published reports specifically investigating chronic smokers indicate globally decreased brain perfusion relative to NSC, as measured by CT 133Xe inhalation [103,104] in older adults and single proton emission computed tomography (SPECT) [105] in adults aged 35.5 ± 8.4 years; perfusion was inversely related to cigarette pack-years [105]. In a Xe-CT-based longitudinal study with community-dwelling older adults, decreases in global cerebral perfusion were independently associated with chronic smoking controlling for other vascular risk factors [106,107].

4. Neurocognitive and Neurobiological Effects of Acute Nicotine Exposure and Withdrawal

When investigating chronic cigarette smoking-induced neurobiological and neurocognitive dysfunction alone, or in conjunction with AUD and other conditions, it is important to distinguish the effects of acute nicotine ingestion and withdrawal from the potential consequences of chronic exposure to the multitude of noxious compounds contained in cigarette smoke. While not the focus of this review, the general findings and implications are discussed regarding the effects of acute nicotine on neurocognition and brain neurobiology, as measured with functional neuroimaging methods [i.e., functional MRI (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single positron emission tomography (SPECT)].

4.1. Acute Nicotine Consumption, Nicotine Withdrawal and Neurocognition

Acute nicotine administration has been found to transiently improve some areas of neurocognition in NSC and individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, most substantially on measures of sustained attention and working memory [17,19,108]. Acute nicotine administration in nicotine deprived smokers is associated with improved cognitive task performance [109,110], whereas several studies report decrements in neurocognitive performance with nicotine administration to NSC (see [19] for review). A recent meta-analysis conducted by Heishman and colleagues [111] suggests that acute smoking or nicotine consumption, independent of withdrawal effects, is associated with enhanced function in the following domains of function: fine motor skills, alerting attention accuracy and response time, orienting attention reaction time, short-term episodic memory accuracy and working memory reaction time (but not accuracy). In non-clinical chronic smokers, the adverse effects of nicotine withdrawal are not typically apparent on neurocognitive function until 8–12 hours after last nicotine dose [17,19,109,112]. Protracted duration from last cigarette smoked/nicotine administration to onset of withdrawal mediated disturbances in neurocognition is likely attributable to the maintenance of relatively high levels of plasma nicotine during waking hours due to repeated dosing of nicotine (via cigarettes) [113].

4.2. Acute Nicotine Consumption, Nicotine Withdrawal and Neurobiological Function

Several functional neuroimaging (PET, SPECT, fMRI) studies in active chronic smokers (see [21,22] for review) and a few functional MRI studies addressed the acute effects of nicotine administration on brain activity during task activation in healthy non-smokers [17,18,20]. The effects of acute cigarette smoking on functional neuroimaging modalities in non-smokers have not been investigated [18,20]. In chronic smokers, functional neuroimaging studies investigating responses to acute smoking or nicotine administration have shown are that acute nicotine administration is associated with decreased global cerebral blood flow, increased activity in the dorsolateral, inferior and mesial frontal and orbitofrontal regions, thalamus and visual processing regions (see [21,22]). In chronic smokers deprived of tobacco for more than 2 hours, acute cigarette smoking elicits different patterns of relative perfusion responses, with increases of the order of 6–8% in the anterior frontal and cingulate cortices as well as decreases in cerebellum and occipital lobes that were associated with plasma nicotine levels [18,114,115]. Some studies report a 7–10% decrease in global glucose utilization following acute nicotine administration in chronic smokers deprived of nicotine for 8 hours or more [116,117]. Depending on the nature of the task, results suggest acute nicotine administration in smokers and non-smokers is associated with increased regional blood flow/brain activity and improves task performance or decreases blood flow/oxygenation level-dependent activity and task performance [18,20]. As discussed by Sharma and Brody [22], the reported regionally specific findings may be influenced by whether or not activity was standardized to whole brain blood flow.

Overall, the effects of acute nicotine administration on neurocognition and functional imaging measures appear to depend on duration of nicotine deprivation, the brain region studied, resting versus activation conditions, and the neurocognitive domain investigated [18].

5. Potential Biological Mechanisms Contributing to Chronic Cigarette Smoking-Induced Neurocognitive and Neurobiological Dysfunction

Nicotine is one of more than 4000 compounds composing the particulate and gas phases of cigarette smoke [5,8,118]. In addition to nicotine, scores of these compounds are bioactive and may affect tissue locally in the oral cavity, the upper and lower respiratory systems, and distally via the systemic circulation. The many potentially cytotoxic compounds in cigarette smoke (e.g., carbon monoxide, aldehydes, ketones, nitrosamines, dihydroxybenzenes) [119] may directly compromise neuronal and cellular membrane function of cerebral tissue. There are several potential mechanisms that may contribute independently, or in concert, to the neurobiological and neurocognitive abnormalities in chronic smokers. These mechanisms may operate in a direct and/or indirect manner. The following overview is based on in vivo and in vitro studies of animals and humans.

5.1. Direct Mechanisms

A significant number of potentially cytotoxic compounds (e.g., carbon monoxide, free radicals and their precursors, nitrosamines, phenolic compounds, and other polynuclear aromatic compounds [119]), are found in the gas and particulate phases of cigarette smoke, which may be directly cytotoxic, damage neuronal or glial cell organelles and promote oxidative damage ([120], Muscat, 2004 #13479, [121,122]). For example, carbon monoxide (CO) levels are significantly higher in smokers [123], and this elevation is associated with decreased effective hemoglobin concentrations, diminished oxygen carrying capacity of erythrocytes [124], as well as a diminished efficiency of the mitochondrial respiratory chain [125]. Furthermore, cigarette smoke also contains high concentrations of free radical species (e.g., reactive nitrogen species; reactive oxygen species, ROS) known to promote oxidative damage or stress to cellular structures as well as to macromolecules including membrane lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and DNA [126]. The radical species in the particulate matter of cigarette smoke are long-lived (i.e., hours to months) compared to those in the gas phase [5], and can compromise organs other than the lungs [120,127]. In vivo chronic exposure of rat brain tissue to cigarette smoke significantly decreases membrane-bound ATPases, which alters ion homeostasis, and leads to increased Ca2+ and Na+ levels in the cytosol of various cell types [128], as well as increased Ca2+ in mitochondria [122], which is associated with neuronal injury or death [129]. Increased mitochondrial Ca2+ secondary to cigarette condensate exposure is associated with damage to the inner mitochondrial membrane (e.g., membrane swelling) and vacuolization of the matrix. Importantly, nicotine delivered independently of cigarette smoke does not appear to produce these adverse affects [122]. Nicotine administration in adolescent rats does, however, evoke cell injury and loss throughout the brain, with significant effects in the hippocampus of female rats but not males [130,131]. In general, the mechanisms underlying the observed nicotine-induced cell injury remain to be fully explicated.

5.2. Indirect Mechanisms

In vivo chronic cigarette smoke exposure is also associated with decreased enzyme-based free radical scavenger (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase) and non-enzyme-based radical scavenger (e.g., glutathione and vitamins A, C and E) concentrations in rat brains [132,133]. This may render brain tissue more vulnerable to oxidative damage by radical species generated by cellular metabolism or other exogenous sources. The brain, in general, is exceedingly susceptible to oxidative damage because of high levels of unsaturated fatty acids in the composition of cell membranes and myelin. Additionally, chronic cigarette smoking is related to nocturnal hypoxia [7] as well as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other conditions that may impair lung function [8]. Decreased lung function is associated with poorer neurocognition and increased subcortical atrophy in older adults [134]. Chronic smoking increases the risk for atherosclerosis [9], as well as abnormalities in vascular endothelial morphology and function [135138], which may alter cerebral perfusion. Additionally, nicotine administered through means other than cigarette smoke may alter or impair vasomotor reactivity of cerebral arterioles through upregulation of Ca2+ channels and/or modulation of nitric oxide [136]. These processes may impact the functional integrity (e.g., vasomotor reactivity/responsivity) of the cerebrovasculature and may, at least partially, contribute to the decreased regional cerebral blood flow [114,115,139] and/or white matter disease [85,8789,140,141] observed in chronic smoking. Both the neocortex and underlying WM are vulnerable to the effects of diffuse ischemia (see [142] and references therein). Correspondingly, it has been suggested that late-myelinating areas such as the frontal and temporal lobes may be particularly vulnerable to increased oxidative stress and cerebral hypoperfusion [143,144], both of which have been described in chronic smokers.

Chronic smoking is also associated with central obesity (often reflected in increased body mass index; BMI) and/or insulin resistance [145], which, in turn, are reported to adversely affect brain neurobiology [146149] and neurocognition [146,150].

In summary, although nicotine is likely the principal bioactive agent that underlies the addictive properties of tobacco smoke [19,151154], the reviewed literature suggests that the majority of adverse neurobiological and neurocognitive effects of chronic cigarette smoking are a function of the direct and indirect consequences of continual exposure of the cardiopulmonary system, cerebrovascular system and brain parenchyma to the combination of non-nicotine combustion products contained in cigarette smoke [13,14,155]. However, a significant amount of data regarding potential mechanisms contributing to the neurobiological and neurocognitive abnormalities observed in humans is derived from in vitro and animal studies. Consequently, it is unclear if all potential mechanisms are generalizable to humans.

6. Discussion

The cumulative body of research reviewed suggests chronic cigarette smoking is associated with deficiencies in auditory-verbal learning and/or memory, general intellectual abilities, visual search speeds, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, working memory and executive functions, across a wide age range. With advancing age, chronic smoking is related to abnormal decline in reasoning, memory and global cognitive function, and may increase the risk for both vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease. However, several studies showed a weak or no association with smoking status and neurocognition. Chronic smoking is related to structural and biochemical abnormalities in multiple brain regions, particularly the anterior dorsolateral, mesial frontal cortex, limbic system and underlying WM. A dose-response relationship is suggested between cigarette smoking, neurocognition and neurobiological function. The reviewed literature suggests the adverse neurobiological and neurocognitive effects of chronic cigarette smoking in humans may be related to the direct and indirect consequences of continual exposure of the cardiopulmonary system, cerebrovascular system and/or brain parenchyma to the combustion products of cigarette smoke. However, the potential mechanisms contributing to the neurobiological abnormalities observed are derived from in vitro and animal studies. Consequently, it is unclear if these mechanisms are actually operational in humans. Furthermore, it is uncertain to what extent, if any, the reported neurocognitive and neurobiological abnormalities reported in smokers are influenced by premorbid or comorbid factors. Overall, the following methodological limitations are present in the reviewed literature:

6.1. Confounding Variables

Potentially confounding medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, insulin-resistance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerosis, neurodegenerative diseases) and comorbid alcohol use/misuse, substance use/misuse, and psychiatric conditions (particularly mood disorders) were not consistently screened or statistically accounted for in many studies. Several psychiatric disorders known to have adverse effects on brain neurobiology and neurocognition are highly prevalent in chronic smokers, including anxiety disorders [156], attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder [157,158], alcohol and substance use disorders [13,157,159], mood disorders [160,161], and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders [162,163]. Additionally, the potential influence of sex, exercise, diet, body mass index, exposure to secondary/environmental smoke, nicotine withdrawal and genetic predispositions [e.g., ApoE4 genotype, single nucleotide polymorphisms in nicotinic acetlycholinergic receptors (nAChr), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2), catechol-O-methyl transferace (COMT)] were not considered. The aforementioned factors are likely mediators or moderators of brain neurobiology and neurocognition in controls and addictive disorders [146,147,149,164181]. Finally, the potential effects of nicotine withdrawal on the primary measures of interest were not addressed in many studies.

6.2. Limited Scope of Neurocognitive Assessment

Overall, there are a limited number of studies in each age group that conducted a comprehensive assessment of neurocognition. Additionally, measures of executive function (e.g., Categories Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III Matrix Reasoning) were seldom administered. In older adults, many of the population-based research used single screening measures of global cognitive function (e.g., MMSE), or employed a composite score based on a limited number of tests primarily used to assess the severity of cognitive dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, only two studies [29,63] investigated the effects of chronic smoking on tasks specifically assessing decision making, risk taking and impulsivity. Consequently, the full scope of the neurocognitive consequences associated with chronic smoking remains unclear.

6.3. Limited Number of Neurocognitive Studies in Young Adults

The vast majority of studies investigating the neurocognitive consequences of chronic cigarette smoking have been conducted in middle aged and older adults. There is a particular shortage of studies in the 30–40 years of age range.

6.4. Limited Number of Neuroimaging Studies

Previous neuroimaging research assessing the chronic effects of cigarette smoking has been primarily restricted to a few CT and MR-based studies of brain morphology, metabolites or blood flow, which primarily targeted neocortical and subcortical GM. Only one study investigated WM integrity via DTI. Prospective multimodal neuroimaging studies thoroughly examining WM morphology, biochemistry and perfusion of regional cerebral WM have not been conducted. Assessment of the cerebral WM is vital to better understand the extent of potential neurobiological dysfunction associated with chronic cigarette smoking.

6.5. Limited Longitudinal Research

The vast majority of studies assessing the neurocognitive and neurobiological consequences of chronic smoking are cross-sectional in design. The few longitudinal neurocognitive and neuroimaging-based studies were conducted with older adult cohorts.

6.6. Absence of MR-based Studies Examining Relationships between Brain Neurobiology and Neurocognition

No study has concurrently combined MR-based neurobiological measures with comprehensive neurocognitive assessment in order to study the correspondence between brain function and neurocognition. Studies relating MR-based brain volumetric and metabolite measures to neurocognition in substance dependent populations have observed different patterns/relationships for smokers and non-smokers [182,183] suggesting a differential use of compensatory functions in smokers and non-smokers to accomplish the same task.

7. Conclusions

Increasing evidence suggests that chronic smoking in community-dwelling participants is associated with diminished function of multiple neurocognitive abilities and neurobiological abnormalities. The cumulative pattern of neurocognitive findings suggests dysfunction prominently in neurocircuitry implicated in decision making, impulse control, judgment, planning and reasoning skills, and in the initiation and maintenance of substance use disorders [184187]. Specifically, the pattern of the neurocognitive and neurobiological findings in chronic smokers points to abnormalities in the brain reward system [186188]. Major components of the brain reward system include (but are not limited to) the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area and other nuclei in the basal forebrain and ventral pallidum [186,189191]. Plastic changes in the brain reward system are implicated in the development and maintenance of all substance use disorders, including nicotine dependence, and other maladaptive behaviors [186188,192194]. However, the actual mechanisms promoting the neurocognitive and neurobiological abnormalities reported in chronic smokers are unclear and premorbid variables(e.g., genetic vulnerabilities) must also be considered as potential contributing factor. More specifically, the neurobiological and neurocognitive abnormalities reported in the reviewed studies may represent premorbid risk factors for the development and maintenance of nicotine dependence and/or premorbid vulnerabilities that were compounded by the effects of chronic smoking. Additionally, as many studies of the neurocognitive consequences of chronic smoking were conducted with older adults, the reported findings may be influenced by a survivor effect [43].

To assist in clarifying the factors contributing to the reported neurocognitive and neurobiological dysfunction, studies are needed that:

  1. Concurrently assess cohorts of males and females ranging from young to older adults.
  2. Employ prospective multi-modality neuroimaging studies (i.e., combining brain morphology, biochemistry, perfusion, and metabolism in the same cohort), with particular attention to the brain reward system.
  3. Employ comprehensive neurocognitive testing including behavioral measures of impulsivity, decision-making and risk taking [24,195,196].
  4. Consider genetic factors (e.g., ApoE genotype, single nucleotide polymorphisms in BDNF, nAChr, DRD2, COMT, glutamate receptors) implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders (see [197200]). Such an approach would better delineate the extent and magnitude of the neurobiological and neurocognitive consequences of chronic cigarette smoking, the roles of common genetic variations in vulnerability to nicotine dependence and their inter-relationships.
  5. Employ prospective serial longitudinal studies to assess changes in neurobiology and neurocognition over extended periods in chronic smokers (e.g., >5 years). Additionally, it is vital to conduct prospective pre-and-post neuroimaging and neurocognitive studies with individuals engaging in smoking cessation programs to determine if smoking-related neurobiological and neurocognitive abnormalities recover with smoking cessation, and to assess the effect of pharmacologic interventions (e.g., nicotine replacement, varenicline) on neurobiological and neurocognitive changes. Such longitudinal studies will assist in determining if the neurocognitive and/or neurobiological abnormalities observed in cross-sectional studies are related to premorbid factors.

In conclusion, chronic cigarette smoking appears to be associated with demonstrable abnormalities in brain neurobiology and neurocognition in cross-sectional research across the lifespan, and is related to abnormal rates of brain volume loss in the elderly. However, the mechanisms promoting these abnormalities have yet to be explicated in humans. To better understand the factors associated with the reported neurocognitive and neurobiological abnormalities, longitudinal research combining comprehensive neurocognitive assessment with neuroimaging of brain metabolites, microstructure, macroscopic morphology, brain function and genetic vulnerabilities are necessary. Such longitudinal studies are required to inform the development of more effective pharmacological and behavioral interventions to reduce the ever-increasing worldwide mortality and morbidity associated with the modifiable health risk that is chronic cigarette smoking.

Acknowledgments

This material is the result of work supported by NIH DA 024136 (TCD), AA10788 (DJM) and DA 13677 and U54 RR025208 (Nelson, PI; SJN, Co-Investigator) with resources and the use of facilities at the San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

References and Notes

1. DeMarini DM. Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: A review. Mutat Res. 2004;567:447–474. [PubMed]
2. Giovino GA. Epidemiology of tobacco use in the United States. Oncogene. 2002;21:7326–7340. [PubMed]
3. Jha P, Peto R, Zatonski W, Boreham J, Jarvis MJ, Lopez AD. Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: Indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America. Lancet. 2006;368:367–370. [PubMed]
4. Dome P, Lazary J, Kalapos MP, Rihmer Z. Smoking, nicotine and neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010;34:295–342. [PubMed]
5. Ambrose JA, Barua RS. The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: An update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1731–1737. [PubMed]
6. Boudreaux ED, Francis JL, Carmack Taylor CL, Scarinci IC, Brantley PJ. Changing multiple health behaviors: Smoking and exercise. Prev. Med. 2003;36:471–478. [PubMed]
7. Casasola GG, Alvarez-Sala JL, Marques JA, Sanchez-Alarcos JM, Tashkin DP, Espinos D. Cigarette smoking behavior and respiratory alterations during sleep in a healthy population. Sleep Breath. 2002;6:19–24. [PubMed]
8. Bartal M. Health effects of tobacco use and exposure. Monaldi. Arch. Chest Dis. 2001;56:545–554. [PubMed]
9. Bolego C, Poli A, Paoletti R. Smoking and gender. Cardiovasc. Res. 2002;53:568–576. [PubMed]
10. Garey KW, Neuhauser MM, Robbins RA, Danziger LH, Rubinstein I. Markers of inflammation in exhaled breath condensate of young healthy smokers. Chest. 2004;125:22–26. [PubMed]
11. Hawkins BT, Brown RC, Davis TP. Smoking and ischemic stroke: A role for nicotine. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2002;23:78–82. [PubMed]
12. Tsushima Y, Tanizaki Y, Aoki J, Endo K. MR detection of microhemorrhages in neurologically healthy adults. Neuroradiology. 2002;44:31–36. [PubMed]
13. Durazzo TC, Meyerhoff DJ. Neurobiological and neurocognitive effects of chronic cigarette smoking and alcoholism. Front Biosci. 2007;12:4079–4100. [PubMed]
14. Swan GE, Lessov-Schlaggar CN. The Effects of Tobacco Smoke and Nicotine on Cognition and the Brain. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2007;17:259–273. [PubMed]
15. Ceballos NA. Tobacco use, alcohol dependence, and cognitive performance. J. Gen. Psychol. 2006;133:375–388. [PubMed]
16. Waters AJ, Sutton SR. Direct and indirect effects of nicotine/smoking on cognition in humans. Addict. Behav. 2000;25:29–43. [PubMed]
17. Sacco KA, Bannon KL, George TP. Nicotinic receptor mechanisms and cognition in normal states and neuropsychiatric disorders. J Psychopharmacol. 2004;18:457–474. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Brody AL. Functional brain imaging of tobacco use and dependence. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2006;40:404–418. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Mansvelder HD, van Aerde KI, Couey JJ, Brussaard AB. Nicotinic modulation of neuronal networks: From receptors to cognition. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:292–305. [PubMed]
20. McClernon FJ, Gilbert DG. Human functional neuroimaging in nicotine and tobacco research: Basics, background, and beyond. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2004;6:941–959. [PubMed]
21. Azizian A, Monterosso J, O’Neill J, London ED. Nicotine Psychopharmacology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; Berlin, Germany: 2009. Magnetic resonance imaging studies of cigarette smoking; pp. 113–143.
22. Sharma A, Brody A. Nicotine Psychopharmacology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; Berlin, Germany: 2009. In vivo brain imaging of human exposure to nicotine and tobacco; pp. 145–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Jacobsen LK, Krystal JH, Mencl WE, Westerveld M, Frost SJ, Pugh KR. Effects of smoking and smoking abstinence on cognition in adolescent tobacco smokers. Biol. Psychiat. 2005;57:56–66. [PubMed]
24. Yakir A, Rigbi A, Kanyas K, Pollak Y, Kahana G, Karni O, Eitan R, Kertzman S, Lerer B. Why do young women smoke? III. Attention and impulsivity as neurocognitive predisposing factors. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007;17:339–351. [PubMed]
25. Fried PA, Watkinson B, Gray R. Neurocognitive consequences of cigarette smoking in young adults—A comparison with pre-drug performance. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2006;28:517–525. [PubMed]
26. Spilich GJ, June L, Renner J. Cigarette smoking and cognitive performance. Br. J. Addict. 1992;87:1313–1326. [PubMed]
27. Weiser M, Zarka S, Werbeloff N, Kravitz E, Lubin G. Cognitive test scores in male adolescent cigarette smokers compared to non-smokers: A population-based study. Addiction. 2010;105:358–363. [PubMed]
28. Wallsten TS, Pleskac TJ, Lejuez CW. Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psychol. Rev. 2005;112:862–880. [PubMed]
29. Lejuez CW, Aklin WM, Jones HA, Richards JB, Strong DR, Kahler CW, Read JP. The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2003;11:26–33. [PubMed]
30. Hill RD, Nilsson LG, Nyberg L, Backman L. Cigarette smoking and cognitive performance in healthy Swedish adults. Age Ageing. 2003;32:548–550. [PubMed]
31. Starr JM, Deary IJ, Fox HC, Whalley LJ. Smoking and cognitive change from age 11 to 66 years: A confirmatory investigation. Addict. Behav. 2006;32:63–68. [PubMed]
32. Kalmijn S, van Boxtel MP, Verschuren MW, Jolles J, Launer LJ. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption in relation to cognitive performance in middle age. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002;156:936–944. [PubMed]
33. Paul RH, Brickman AM, Cohen RA, Williams LM, Niaura R, Pogun S, Clark CR, Gunstad J, Gordon E. Cognitive status of young and older cigarette smokers: Data from the international brain database. J Clin. Neurosci. 2006;13:457–465. [PubMed]
34. Edelstein SL, Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E. Prospective association of smoking and alcohol use with cognitive function in an elderly cohort. J. Womens Health. 1998;7:1271–1281. [PubMed]
35. Ernst M, Heishman SJ, Spurgeon L, London ED. Smoking history and nicotine effects on cognitive performance. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;25:313–319. [PubMed]
36. George TP, Vessicchio JC, Termine A, Sahady DM, Head CA, Pepper WT, Kosten TR, Wexler BE. Effects of smoking abstinence on visuospatial working memory function in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;26:75–85. [PubMed]
37. Razani J, Boone K, Lesser I, Weiss D. Effects of cigarette smoking history on cognitice functioning in healthy older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;12:404–411. [PubMed]
38. Caspers K, Arndt S, Yucuis R, McKirgan L, Spinks R. Effects of alcohol- and cigarette-use disorders on global and specific measures of cognition in middle-age adults. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs. 2010;71:192–200. [PubMed]
39. Deary IJ, Pattie A, Taylor MD, Whiteman MC, Starr JM, Whalley LJ. Smoking and cognitive change from age 11 to age 80. J. Neurol. Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:1003–1007. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Richards M, Jarvis MJ, Thompson N, Wadsworth ME. Cigarette smoking and cognitive decline in midlife: evidence from a prospective birth cohort study. Am. J. Public Health. 2003;93:994–998. [PubMed]
41. Whalley LJ, Fox HC, Deary IJ, Starr JM. Childhood IQ, smoking, and cognitive change from age 11 to 64 years. Addict. Behav. 2005;30:77–88. [PubMed]
42. Hill RD. Residual effects of cigarette smoking on cognitive performance in normal aging. Psycho. l Aging. 1989;4:251–254. [PubMed]
43. Sabia S, Marmot M, Dufouil C, Singh-Manoux A. Smoking history and cognitive function in middle age from the Whitehall II study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008;168:1165–1173. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Huadong Z, Juan D, Jingcheng L, Yanjiang W, Meng Z, Hongbo H. Study of the relationship between cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking and cognitive impairment among elderly people in China. Age Ageing. 2003;32:205–210. [PubMed]
45. Stewart MC, Deary IJ, Fowkes FG, Price JF. Relationship between lifetime smoking, smoking status at older age and human cognitive function. Neuroepidemiology. 2006;26:83–92. [PubMed]
46. Galanis DJ, Petrovitch H, Launer LJ, Harris TB, Foley DJ, White LR. Smoking history in middle age and subsequent cognitive performance in elderly Japanese-American men. The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1997;145:507–515. [PubMed]
47. Fischer P, Zehetmayer S, Bauer K, Huber K, Jungwirth S, Tragl KH. Relation between vascular risk factors and cognition at age 75. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2006;114:84–90. [PubMed]
48. Wang L, van Belle G, Kukull WB, Larson EB. Predictors of functional change: A longitudinal study of nondemented people aged 65 and older. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002;50:1525–1534. [PubMed]
49. Iki M, Ishizaki H, Aalto H, Starck J, Pyykko I. Smoking habits and postural stability. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 1994;15:124–128. [PubMed]
50. Ott A, Andersen K, Dewey ME, Letenneur L, Brayne C, Copeland JR, Dartigues JF, Kragh-Sorensen P, Lobo A, Martinez-Lage JM, Stijnen T, Hofman A, Launer LJ. Effect of smoking on global cognitive function in nondemented elderly. Neurology. 2004;62:920–924. [PubMed]
51. Cervilla JA, Prince M, Mann A. Smoking, drinking, and incident cognitive impairment: A cohort community based study included in the Gospel Oak project. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2000;68:622–626. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Dufouil C, Tzourio C, Brayne C, Berr C, Amouyel P, Alperovitch A. Influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on the risk of cognitive deterioration in moderate drinkers and smokers. Epidemiology. 2000;11:280–284. [PubMed]
53. Launer LJ, Feskens EJ, Kalmijn S, Kromhout D. Smoking, drinking, and thinking. The Zutphen Elderly Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1996;143:219–227. [PubMed]
54. Reitz C, Luchsinger J, Tang MX, Mayeux R. Effect of smoking and time on cognitive function in the elderly without dementia. Neurology. 2005;65:870–875. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Heffernan TM, Ling J, Parrott AC, Buchanan T, Scholey AB, Rodgers J. Self-rated everyday and prospective memory abilities of cigarette smokers and non-smokers: A web-based study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;78:235–241. [PubMed]
56. Cerhan JR, Folsom AR, Mortimer JA, Shahar E, Knopman DS, McGovern PG, Hays MA, Crum LD, Heiss G. Correlates of cognitive function in middle-aged adults. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Gerontology. 1998;44:95–105. [PubMed]
57. Launer LJ, Andersen K, Dewey ME, Letenneur L, Ott A, Amaducci LA, Brayne C, Copeland JR, Dartigues JF, Kragh-Sorensen P, Lobo A, Martinez-Lage JM, Stijnen T, Hofman A. Rates and risk factors for dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: results from EURODEM pooled analyses. EURODEM Incidence Research Group and Work Groups. European Studies of Dementia. Neurology. 1999;52:78–84. [PubMed]
58. Ott A, Slooter AJ, Hofman A, van Harskamp F, Witteman JC, van Broeckhoven C, van Duijn CM, Breteler MM. Smoking and risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in a population-based cohort study: the Rotterdam Study. Lancet. 1998;351:1840–1843. [PubMed]
59. Merchant C, Tang MX, Albert S, Manly J, Stern Y, Mayeux R. The influence of smoking on the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1999;52:1408–1412. [PubMed]
60. Anstey KJ, von Sanden C, Salim A, O’Kearney R. Smoking as a risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007;166:367–378. [PubMed]
61. Tyas SL, White LR, Petrovitch H, Webster Ross G, Foley DJ, Heimovitz HK, Launer LJ. Mid-life smoking and late-life dementia: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Neurobiol. Aging. 2003;24:589–596. [PubMed]
62. Sakurai Y, Kanazawa I. Acute effects of cigarettes in non-deprived smokers on memory, calculation and executive functions. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2002;17:369–373. [PubMed]
63. Businelle MS, Apperson MR, Kendzor DE, Terlecki MA, Copeland AL. The relative impact of nicotine dependence, other substance dependence, and gender on Bechara Gambling Task performance. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2008;16:513–520. [PubMed]
64. Schinka JA, Vanderploeg RD, Rogish M, Graves AB, Mortimer JA, Ordoric PI. Effects of the use of alcohol and cigarettes on cognition in elderly adults. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2002;8:811–818. [PubMed]
65. Schinka JA, Belanger H, Mortimer JA, Graves AB. Effects of the use of alcohol and cigarettes on cognition in elderly African American adults. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2003;9:690–697. [PubMed]
66. Chen WT, Wang PN, Wang SJ, Fuh JL, Lin KN, Liu HC. Smoking and cognitive performance in the community elderly: A longitudinal study. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 2003;16:18–22. [PubMed]
67. Schinka JA, Vanderploeg RD, Rogish M, Ordorica PI. Effects of alcohol and cigarette use on cognition in middle-aged adults. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2002;8:683–690. [PubMed]
68. Ford AB, Mefrouche Z, Friedland RP, Debanne SM. Smoking and cognitive impairment: A population-based study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1996;44:905–909. [PubMed]
69. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Beckett LA, Albert MS, Rosner B, Taylor JO, Evans DA. Relation of Smoking and Low-to-moderate Alcohol Consumption to Change in Cognitive Function: A Longitudinal Study in a Defined Community of Older Persons. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1993;137:881–891. [PubMed]
70. Elwan O, Hassan AA, Abdel Naseer M, Elwan F, Deif R, El Serafy O, El Banhawy E, El Fatatry M. Brain aging in a sample of normal Egyptians cognition, education, addiction and smoking. J. Neurol. Sci. 1997;148:79–86. [PubMed]
71. Spilich GJ, June L, Renner J. Cigarette smoking and cognitive performance. Br. J. Addict. 1992;87:1313–1326. [PubMed]
72. Lejuez CW, Read JP, Kahler CW, Richards JB, Ramsey SE, Stuart GL, Strong DR, Brown RA. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2002;8:75–84. [PubMed]
73. Razani J, Boone K, Lesser I, Weiss D. Effects of cigarette smoking history on cognitive functioning in healthy older adults. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2004;12:404–411. [PubMed]
74. Akiyama H, Meyer JS, Mortel KF, Terayama Y, Thornby J, Konno S. Normal human aging: Factors contributing to cerebral atrophy. J. Neurol. Sci. 1997;152:39–49. [PubMed]
75. Hayee A, Haque A, Anwarullah A, Rabbani M. Smoking enhances age related brain atrophy—A quantitative study with computed tomography. Bangladesh Med. Res. Counc. Bull. 2003;29:118–124. [PubMed]
76. Kubota K, Matsuzawa T, Fujiwara T, Yamaguchi T, Ito K, Watanabe H, Ono S. Age-related brain atrophy enhanced by smoking: A quantitative study with computed tomography. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1987;153:303–311. [PubMed]
77. Swan GE, DeCarli C, Miller BL, Reed T, Wolf PA, Carmelli D. Biobehavioral characteristics of nondemented older adults with subclinical brain atrophy. Neurology. 2000;54:2108–2114. [PubMed]
78. Longstreth WT, Jr, Arnold AM, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Bryan N, Jungreis CA, O’Leary D, Enright PL, Fried L. Clinical correlates of ventricular and sulcal size on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3,301 elderly people. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Collaborative Research Group. Neuroepidemiology. 2000;19:30–42. [PubMed]
79. Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, Jarvik ME, Lee GS, Smith EC, Huang JC, Bota RG, Bartzokis G, London ED. Differences between smokers and nonsmokers in regional gray matter volumes and densities. Biol. Psychiatry. 2004;55:77–84. [PubMed]
80. Gallinat J, Meisenzahl E, Jacobsen LK, Kalus P, Bierbrauer J, Kienast T, Witthaus H, Leopold K, Seifert F, Schubert F, Staedtgen M. Smoking and structural brain deficits: A volumetric MR investigation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006;24:1744–1750. [PubMed]
81. Almeida OP, Garrido GJ, Lautenschlager NT, Hulse GK, Jamrozik K, Flicker L. Smoking is associated with reduced cortical regional gray matter density in brain regions associated with incipient Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2008;16:92–98. [PubMed]
82. Paul RH, Grieve SM, Niaura R, David SP, Laidlaw DH, Cohen R, Sweet L, Taylor G, Clark RC, Pogun S, Gordon E. Chronic cigarette smoking and the microstructural integrity of white matter in healthy adults: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2008;10:137–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Lim KO, Helpern JA. Neuropsychiatric applications of DTI—A review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:587–593. [PubMed]
84. Sundgren PC, Dong Q, Gomez-Hassan D, Mukherji SK, Maly P, Welsh R. Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain: Review of clinical applications. Neuroradiology. 2004;46:339–350. [PubMed]
85. Fukuda H, Kitani M. Cigarette smoking is correlated with the periventricular hyperintensity grade of brain magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 1996;27:645–649. [PubMed]
86. Jeerakathil T, Wolf PA, Beiser A, Massaro J, Seshadri S, D’Agostino RB, DeCarli C. Stroke risk profile predicts white matter hyperintensity volume: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2004;35:1857–1861. [PubMed]
87. Longstreth WT, Jr, Arnold AM, Beauchamp NJ, Jr, Manolio TA, Lefkowitz D, Jungreis C, Hirsch CH, O’Leary DH, Furberg CD. Incidence, manifestations, and predictors of worsening white matter on serial cranial magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 2005;36:56–61. [PubMed]
88. Ding J, Nieto FJ, Beauchamp NJ, Longstreth WT, Jr, Manolio TA, Hetmanski JB, Fried LP. A prospective analysis of risk factors for white matter disease in the brain stem: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2003;22:275–282. [PubMed]
89. Longstreth WT, Jr, Manolio TA, Arnold A, Burke GL, Bryan N, Jungreis CA, Enright PL, O’Leary D, Fried L. Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3,301 elderly people. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 1996;27:1274–1282. [PubMed]
90. Marstrand JR, Garde E, Rostrup E, Ring P, Rosenbaum S, Mortensen EL, Larsson HB. Cerebral perfusion and cerebrovascular reactivity are reduced in white matter hyperintensities. Stroke. 2002;33:972–976. [PubMed]
91. Bisschops RH, van der Graaf Y, Mali WP, van der Grond J. High total cerebral blood flow is associated with a decrease of white matter lesions. J. Neurol. 2004;251:1481–1485. [PubMed]
92. DeCarli C, Murphy DG, Tranh M, Grady CL, Haxby JV, Gillette JA, Salerno JA, Gonzales-Aviles A, Horwitz B, Rapoport SI, et al. The effect of white matter hyperintensity volume on brain structure, cognitive performance, and cerebral metabolism of glucose in 51 healthy adults. Neurology. 1995;45:2077–2084. [PubMed]
93. Gunning-Dixon FM, Raz N. The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: a quantitative review. Neuropsychology. 2000;14:224–232. [PubMed]
94. Ross B, Bluml S. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human brain. Anat. Rec. 2001;265:54–84. [PubMed]
95. Moffett JR, Ross B, Arun P, Madhavarao CN, Namboodiri AM. N-Acetylaspartate in the CNS: From neurodiagnostics to neurobiology. Prog. Neurobiol. 2007;81:89–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
96. Miller BL, Chang L, Booth R, Ernst T, Cornford M, Nikas D, McBride D, Jenden DJ. In vivo 1H MRS choline: Correlation with in vitro chemistry/histology. Life Sci. 1996;58:1929–1935. [PubMed]
97. Gallinat J, Lang UE, Jacobsen LK, Bajbouj M, Kalus P, von Haebler D, Seifert F, Schubert F. Abnormal hippocampal neurochemistry in smokers: Evidence from proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2007;27:80–84. [PubMed]
98. Gallinat J, Schubert F. Regional cerebral glutamate concentrations and chronic tobacco consumption. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2007;40:64–67. [PubMed]
99. Enoch MA. Pharmacogenomics of alcohol response and addiction. Am. J. Pharmacogenomics. 2003;3:217–232. [PubMed]
100. George TP, O’Malley SS. Current pharmacological treatments for nicotine dependence. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2004;25:42–48. [PubMed]
101. Heinz A, Schafer M, Higley JD, Krystal JH, Goldman D. Neurobiological correlates of the disposition and maintenance of alcoholism. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2003;36(Suppl 3):S255–258. [PubMed]
102. Epperson CN, O’Malley S, Czarkowski KA, Gueorguieva R, Jatlow P, Sanacora G, Rothman DL, Krystal JH, Mason GF. Sex, GABA, and nicotine: The impact of smoking on cortical GABA levels across the menstrual cycle as measured with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biol. Psychiatry. 2005;57:44–48. [PubMed]
103. Rogers RL, Meyer JS, Shaw TG, Mortel KF, Hardenberg JP, Zaid RR. Cigarette Smoking Decreases Cerebral Blood Flow Suggesting Increased Risk for Stroke. JAMA. 1983;250:2796–2800. [PubMed]
104. Yamashita K, Kobayashi S, Yamaguchi S, Kitani M, Tsunematsu T. Effect of smoking on regional cerebral blood flow in the normal aged volunteers. Gerontology. 1988;34:199–204. [PubMed]
105. Rourke SB, Dupont RM, Grant I, Lehr PP, Lamoureux G, Halpern S, Yeung DW. Reduction in cortical IMP-SPET tracer uptake with recent cigarette consumption in a young group of healthy males. San Diego HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1997;24:422–427. [PubMed]
106. Meyer JS, Rauch G, Rauch RA, Haque A. Risk factors for cerebral hypoperfusion, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Neurobiol. Aging. 2000;21:161–169. [PubMed]
107. Akiyama H, Meyer JS, Mortel KF, Terayama Y, Thornby JI, Konno S. Normal human aging: Factors contributing to cerebral atrophy. J. Neurol. Sci. 1997;152:39–49. [PubMed]
108. Rezvani AH, Levin ED. Cognitive effects of nicotine. Biol. Psychiatry. 2001;49:258–267. [PubMed]
109. Mendrek A, Monterosso J, Simon SL, Jarvik M, Brody A, Olmstead R, Domier CP, Cohen MS, Ernst M, London ED. Working memory in cigarette smokers: Comparison to non-smokers and effects of abstinence. Addict. Behav. 2006;31:833–844. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
110. Parrott AC. Nicotine psychobiology: How chronic-dose prospective studies can illuminate some of the theoretical issues from acute-dose research. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:567–576. [PubMed]
111. Heishman SJ, Kleykamp BA, Singleton EG. Meta-analysis of the acute effects of nicotine and smoking on human performance. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2010;210:453–469. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
112. Xu J, Mendrek A, Cohen MS, Monterosso J, Rodriguez P, Simon SL, Brody A, Jarvik M, Domier CP, Olmstead R, Ernst M, London ED. Brain activity in cigarette smokers performing a working memory task: effect of smoking abstinence. Biol. Psychiatry. 2005;58:143–150. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
113. Hukkanen J, Jacob P, 3rd, Benowitz NL. Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005;57:79–115. [PubMed]
114. Domino EF, Ni L, Xu Y, Koeppe RA, Guthrie S, Zubieta JK. Regional cerebral blood flow and plasma nicotine after smoking tobacco cigarettes. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2004;28:319–327. [PubMed]
115. Rose JE, Behm FM, Westman EC, Mathew RJ, London ED, Hawk TC, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. PET studies of the influences of nicotine on neural systems in cigarette smokers. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2003;160:323–333. [PubMed]
116. Domino EF, Minoshima S, Guthrie SK, Ohl L, Ni L, Koeppe RA, Cross DJ, Zubieta J. Effects of nicotine on regional cerebral glucose metabolism in awake resting tobacco smokers. Neuroscience. 2000;101:277–282. [PubMed]
117. Stapleton JM, Gilson SF, Wong DF, Villemagne VL, Dannals RF, Grayson RF, Henningfield JE, London ED. Intravenous nicotine reduces cerebral glucose metabolism: A preliminary study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28:765–772. [PubMed]
118. Bates C, Jarvis M, Connolly G. Tobacco Additives: Cigarette Engineering and Nicotine Addiction. Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program; Boston, MA, USA: 1999. pp. 1–23.
119. Fowles J, Bates M, Noiton D. The Chemical Constituents in Cigarettes and Cigarette Smoke: Priorities for Harm Reduction. Epidemiology and Toxicology Group; Porirua, New Zealand: 2000. pp. 1–65.
120. Park EM, Park YM, Gwak YS. Oxidative damage in tissues of rats exposed to cigarette smoke. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1998;25:79–86. [PubMed]
121. Muscat JE, Kleinman W, Colosimo S, Muir A, Lazarus P, Park J, Richie JP., Jr Enhanced protein glutathiolation and oxidative stress in cigarette smokers. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004;36:464–470. [PubMed]
122. Yang YM, Liu GT. Injury of mouse brain mitochondria induced by cigarette smoke extract and effect of vitamin C on it in vitro. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2003;16:256–266. [PubMed]
123. Deveci S, Deveci F, Acik Y, Ozan A. The measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide in healthy smokers and non-smokers. Resp. Med. 2004;98:551–556. [PubMed]
124. Macdonald G, Kondor N, Yousefi V, Green A, Wong F, Aquino-Parsons C. Reduction of carboxyhaemoglobin levels in the venous blood of cigarette smokers following the administration of carbogen. Radiother. Oncol. 2004;73:367–371. [PubMed]
125. Alonso JR, Cardellach F, Casademont J, Miro O. Reversible inhibition of mitochondrial complex IV activity in PBMC following acute smoking. Eur. Respir. J. 2004;23:214–218. [PubMed]
126. Moriarty SE, Shah JH, Lynn M, Jiang S, Openo K, Jones DP, Sternberg P. Oxidation of glutathione and cysteine in human plasma associated with smoking. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003;35:1582–1588. [PubMed]
127. Panda K, Chattopadhyay R, Chattopadhyay DJ, Chatterjee IB. Vitamin C prevents cigarette smoke-induced oxidative damage in vivo. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000;29:115–124. [PubMed]
128. Anbarasi K, Vani G, Balakrishna K, Devi CS. Effect of bacoside A on membrane-bound ATPases in the brain of rats exposed to cigarette smoke. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2005;19:59–65. [PubMed]
129. Xiao AY, Wei L, Xia S, Rothman S, Yu SP. Ionic mechanism of ouabain-induced concurrent apoptosis and necrosis in individual cultured cortical neurons. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:1350–1362. [PubMed]
130. Abreu-Villaca Y, Seidler FJ, Tate CA, Slotkin TA. Nicotine is a neurotoxin in the adolescent brain: critical periods, patterns of exposure, regional selectivity, and dose thresholds for macromolecular alterations. Brain Res. 2003;979:114–128. [PubMed]
131. Slotkin TA. Nicotine and the adolescent brain: insights from an animal model. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2002;24:369–384. [PubMed]
132. Mendez-Alvarez E, Soto-Otero R, Sanchez-Sellero I, Lopez-Rivadulla Lamas M. In vitro inhibition of catalase activity by cigarette smoke: relevance for oxidative stress. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1998;18:443–448. [PubMed]
133. Anbarasi K, Vani G, Balakrishna K, Devi CS. Effect of bacoside A on brain antioxidant status in cigarette smoke exposed rats. Life Sci. 2006;78:1378–1384. [PubMed]
134. Sachdev PS, Anstey KJ, Parslow RA, Wen W, Maller J, Kumar R, Christensen H, Jorm AF. Pulmonary function, cognitive impairment and brain atrophy in a middle-aged community sample. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2006;21:300–308. [PubMed]
135. Hawkins BT, Brown RC, Davis TP. Smoking and ischemic stroke: A role for nicotine? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2002;23:78–82. [PubMed]
136. Gerzanich V, Zhang F, West GA, Simard JM. Chronic nicotine alters NO signaling of Ca(2+) channels in cerebral arterioles. Circ. Res. 2001;88:359–365. [PubMed]
137. Terborg C, Bramer S, Weiller C, Rother J. Short-term effect of cigarette smoking on CO(2)-induced vasomotor reactivity in man: A study with near-infrared spectroscopy and tanscranial Doppler sonography. J. Neurol. Sci. 2002;205:15–20. [PubMed]
138. Michael Pittilo R. Cigarette smoking, endothelial injury and cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2000;81:219–230. [PubMed]
139. Zubieta J, Lombardi U, Minoshima S, Guthrie S, Ni L, Ohl LE, Koeppe RA, Domino EF. Regional cerebral blood flow effects of nicotine in overnight abstinent smokers. Biol. Psychiatry. 2001;49:906–913. [PubMed]
140. Jeerakathil T, Wolf PA, Beiser A, Hald JK, Au R, Kase CS, Massaro JM, DeCarli C. Cerebral microbleeds: Prevalence and associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2004;35:1831–1835. [PubMed]
141. Liao D, Cooper L, Cai J, Toole J, Bryan N, Burke G, Shahar E, Nieto J, Mosley T, Heiss G. The prevalence and severity of white matter lesions, their relationship with age, ethnicity, gender, and cardiovascular disease risk factors: the ARIC Study. Neuroepidemiology. 1997;16:149–162. [PubMed]
142. Chalela JA, Wolf RL, Maldjian JA, Kasner SE. MRI identification of early white matter injury in anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Neurology. 2001;56:481–485. [PubMed]
143. Bartzokis G. Age-related myelin breakdown: A developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:5–18. author reply 49–62. [PubMed]
144. Bartzokis G. Quadratic trajectories of brain myelin content: Unifying construct for neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurobiol. Aging. 2004;25:49–62.
145. Chiolero A, Faeh D, Paccaud F, Cornuz J. Consequences of smoking for body weight, body fat distribution, and insulin resistance. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:801–809. [PubMed]
146. Convit A. Links between cognitive impairment in insulin resistance: An explanatory model. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(Suppl 1):31–35. [PubMed]
147. Ward MA, Carlsson CM, Trivedi MA, Sager MA, Johnson SC. The effect of body mass index on global brain volume in middle-aged adults: A cross sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2005;5:23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
148. Haltia LT, Viljanen A, Parkkola R, Kemppainen N, Rinne JO, Nuutila P, Kaasinen V. Brain white matter expansion in human obesity and the recovering effect of dieting. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;92:3278–3284. [PubMed]
149. Gazdzinski S, Kornak J, Weiner MW, Meyerhoff DJ. Body mass index and magnetic resonance markers of brain integrity in adults. Ann. Neurol. 2008;63:652–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
150. Jeong SK, Nam HS, Son MH, Son EJ, Cho KH. Interactive effect of obesity indexes on cognition. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2005;19:91–96. [PubMed]
151. Dani JA, De Biasi M. Cellular mechanisms of nicotine addiction. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2001;70:439–446. [PubMed]
152. Mansvelder HD, De Rover M, McGehee DS, Brussaard AB. Cholinergic modulation of dopaminergic reward areas: Upstream and downstream targets of nicotine addiction. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003;480:117–123. [PubMed]
153. Vallejo YF, Buisson B, Bertrand D, Green WN. Chronic nicotine exposure upregulates nicotinic receptors by a novel mechanism. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:5563–5572. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
154. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Ding YS, Wang GJ, Gatley SJ. Imaging the neurochemistry of nicotine actions: Studies with positron emission tomography. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1(Suppl 2):S127–132. discussion S139–140. [PubMed]
155. Haustein KO. Smoking tobacco, microcirculatory changes and the role of nicotine. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999;37:76–85. [PubMed]
156. Breslau N, Novak SP, Kessler RC. Psychiatric disorders and stages of smoking. Biol. Psychiatry. 2004;55:69–76. [PubMed]
157. Rohde P, Kahler CW, Lewinsohn PM, Brown RA. Psychiatric disorders, familial factors, and cigarette smoking: II. Associations with progression to daily smoking. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2004;6:119–132. [PubMed]
158. Ohlmeier MD, Peters K, Te Wildt BT, Zedler M, Ziegenbein M, Wiese B, Emrich HM, Schneider U. Comorbidity of alcohol and substance dependence with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Alcohol Alcoholism. 2008;43:300–304. [PubMed]
159. Schumann A, Hapke U, Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, John U. Prevalence, characteristics, associated mental disorders and predictors of DSM-IV nicotine dependence. Eur. Addict. Res. 2004;10:29–34. [PubMed]
160. Paperwalla KN, Levin TT, Weiner J, Saravay SM. Smoking and depression. Med Clin North Am. 2004;88:1483–1494. x–xi. [PubMed]
161. Fergusson DM, Goodwin RD, Horwood LJ. Major depression and cigarette smoking: Results of a 21-year longitudinal study. Psychol. Med. 2003;33:1357–1367. [PubMed]
162. Smith RC, Singh A, Infante M, Khandat A, Kloos A. Effects of cigarette smoking and nicotine nasal spray on psychiatric symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;27:479–497. [PubMed]
163. Dolan SL, Sacco KA, Termine A, Seyal AA, Dudas MM, Vessicchio JC, Wexler BE, George TP. Neuropsychological deficits are associated with smoking cessation treatment failure in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2004;70:263–275. [PubMed]
164. Pignatti R, Bertella L, Albani G, Mauro A, Molinari E, Semenza C. Decision-making in obesity: A study using the Gambling Task. Eat. Weight Disord. 2006;11:126–132. [PubMed]
165. Cotman CW, Berchtold NC. Exercise: A behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:295–301. [PubMed]
166. Dishman RK, Berthoud HR, Booth FW, Cotman CW, Edgerton VR, Fleshner MR, Gandevia SC, Gomez-Pinilla F, Greenwood BN, Hillman CH, Kramer AF, Levin BE, Moran TH, Russo-Neustadt AA, Salamone JD, Van Hoomissen JD, Wade CE, York DA, Zigmond MJ. Neurobiology of exercise. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14:345–356. [PubMed]
167. Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008;9:58–65. [PubMed]
168. Duman RS. Neurotrophic factors and regulation of mood: role of exercise, diet and metabolism. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(Suppl 1):88–93. [PubMed]
169. Parrott MD, Greenwood CE. Dietary influences on cognitive function with aging: From high-fat diets to healthful eating. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1114:389–397. [PubMed]
170. Wadley VG, McClure LA, Howard VJ, Unverzagt FW, Go RC, Moy CS, Crowther MR, Gomez CR, Howard G. Cognitive status, stroke symptom reports, and modifiable risk factors among individuals with no diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study. Stroke. 2007;38:1143–1147. [PubMed]
171. Gustafson D, Lissner L, Bengtsson C, Bjorkelund C, Skoog I. A 24-year follow-up of body mass index and cerebral atrophy. Neurology. 2004;63:1876–1881. [PubMed]
172. Ng TP, Feng L, Niti M, Yap KB. Albumin, haemoglobin, BMI and cognitive performance in older adults. Age Ageing. 2008;37:423–429. [PubMed]
173. Atkinson HH, Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BW, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, Williamson JD. Predictors of combined cognitive and physical decline. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005;53:1197–1202. [PubMed]
174. Bretsky P, Guralnik JM, Launer L, Albert M, Seeman TE. The role of APOE-epsilon4 in longitudinal cognitive decline: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. Neurology. 2003;60:1077–1081. [PubMed]
175. Cabeza R. Cognitive neuroscience of aging: Contributions of functional neuroimaging. Scand. J. Psychol. 2001;42:277–286. [PubMed]
176. Catani M, Cherubini A, Howard R, Tarducci R, Pelliccioli GP, Piccirilli M, Gobbi G, Senin U, Mecocci P. (1)H-MR spectroscopy differentiates mild cognitive impairment from normal brain aging. Neuroreport. 2001;12:2315–2317. [PubMed]
177. Charlton RA, McIntyre DJ, Howe FA, Morris RG, Markus HS. The relationship between white matter brain metabolites and cognition in normal aging: The GENIE study. Brain Res. 2007;1164:108–116. [PubMed]
178. Elias MF, Elias PK, Sullivan LM, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB. Obesity, diabetes and cognitive deficit: The Framingham Heart Study. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(Suppl 1):11–16. [PubMed]
179. Finkel D, Reynolds CA, McArdle JJ, Pedersen NL. Age changes in processing speed as a leading indicator of cognitive aging. Psychol. Aging. 2007;22:558–568. [PubMed]
180. Meyerhoff DJ, Durazzo TC. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in alcohol use disorders: A potential new endophenotype? Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2008;32:1146–1158. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
181. Rigbi A, Kanyas K, Yakir A, Greenbaum L, Pollak Y, Ben-Asher E, Lancet D, Kertzman S, Lerer B. Why do young women smoke? V. Role of direct and interactive effects of nicotinic cholinergic receptor gene variation on neurocognitive function. Genes Brain Behav. 2008;7:164–172. [PubMed]
182. Durazzo TC, Gazdzinski S, Banys P, Meyerhoff DJ. Brain metabolite concentrations and neurocognition during short-term recovery from alcohol dependence: Preliminary evidence of the effects of concurrent chronic cigarette smoking. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2006;30:539–551. [PubMed]
183. Gazdzinski S, Durazzo TC, Studholme C, Song E, Banys P, Meyerhoff DJ. Quantitative brain MRI in alcohol dependence: preliminary evidence for effects of concurrent chronic cigarette smoking on regional brain volumes. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2005;29:1484–1495. [PubMed]
184. Cummings JL. Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. J. Psychosom Res. 1998;44:627–628. [PubMed]
185. Saint-Cyr JA. Frontal-striatal circuit functions: context, sequence, and consequence. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2003;9:103–127. [PubMed]
186. Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2005;162:1403–1413. [PubMed]
187. Baler RD, Volkow ND. Drug addiction: the neurobiology of disrupted self-control. Trends Mol. Med. 2006;12:559–566. [PubMed]
188. Kalivas PW, O’Brien C. Drug addiction as a pathology of staged neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:166–180. [PubMed]
189. Makris N, Oscar-Berman M, Jaffin SK, Hodge SM, Kennedy DN, Caviness VS, Marinkovic K, Breiter HC, Gasic GP, Harris GJ. Decreased volume of the brain reward system in alcoholism. Biol. Psychiatry. 2008;64:192–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
190. Paulus MP. Neural basis of reward and craving—A homeostatic point of view. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2007;9:379–387. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
191. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Telang F. Overlapping neuronal circuits in addiction and obesity: Evidence of systems pathology. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2008;363:3191–3200. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
192. Koob GF. Alcoholism: allostasis and beyond. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2003;27:232–243. [PubMed]
193. Lubman DI, Yucel M, Pantelis C. Addiction, a condition of compulsive behaviour? Neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence of inhibitory dysregulation. Addiction. 2004;99:1491–1502. [PubMed]
194. Wang Z, Faith M, Patterson F, Tang K, Kerrin K, Wileyto EP, Detre JA, Lerman C. Neural substrates of abstinence-induced cigarette cravings in chronic smokers. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:14035–14040. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
195. Mitchell SH. Measuring impulsivity and modeling its association with cigarette smoking. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 2004;3:261–275. [PubMed]
196. VanderVeen JW, Cohen LM, Cukrowicz KC, Trotter DR. The role of impulsivity on smoking maintenance. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2008;10:1397–1404. [PubMed]
197. Hodgkinson CA, Yuan Q, Xu K, Shen PH, Heinz E, Lobos EA, Binder EB, Cubells J, Ehlers CL, Gelernter J, Mann J, Riley B, Roy A, Tabakoff B, Todd RD, Zhou Z, Goldman D. Addictions biology: Haplotype-based analysis for 130 candidate genes on a single array. Alcohol Alcoholism. 2008;43:505–515. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
198. Huang W, Payne TJ, Ma JZ, Li MD. A functional polymorphism, rs6280, in DRD3 is significantly associated with nicotine dependence in European-American smokers. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B. 2008;147B:1109–115. [PubMed]
199. Batra V, Patkar AA, Berrettini WH, Weinstein SP, Leone FT. The genetic determinants of smoking. Chest. 2003;123:1730–1739. [PubMed]
200. Hoft NR, Corley RP, McQueen MB, Schlaepfer IR, Huizinga D, Ehringer MA. Genetic Association of the CHRNA6 and CHRNB3 Genes with Tobacco Dependence in a Nationally Representative Sample. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:698–706. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)