1. Erickson BH.
The relational basis of attitudes. In: Wellman B, Berkowitz SD, editors. , eds. Social structures: a network approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988:99–121.
2. Coleman J, Katz E, Menzel H.
Medical innovation: a diffusion study. 2nd edn
New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.
3. Kaplan B.
Evaluating informatics applications—some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inf
2001;64:39–56. [PubMed] 4. Delpierre C, Cuzin L, Fillaux J, et al.
A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach?
Int J Qual Health Care
2004;16:407–16. [PubMed] 5. Goddard BL.
Termination of a contract to implement an enterprise electronic medical record system. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2000;7:564–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 6. Kazley AS, Ozcan YA.
Do hospitals with electronic medical records (EMRs) provide higher quality care? An examination of three clinical conditions. Med Care Res Rev
2008;65:496–513. [PubMed] 7. Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, et al.
Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics
8. Agarwal R, Prasad J.
The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci
9. Venkatesh V, Morris MG.
Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart
10. Morris MG, Venkatesh V.
Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Pers Psychol
11. Straub D, Keil M, Brenner W.
Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study. Inf Manage
12. Edwards N, Kornacki MJ, Silversin J.
Unhappy doctors: what are the causes and what can be done?
2002;324:835–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Barki H, Hartwick J.
Measuring user participation, use involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quart
14. Mead GH.
Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1934.
15. Blumer H.
Symbolic interactionism, perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.
16. Davis FD.
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart
17. Fishbein M, Ajzen I.
Beliefs, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
18. Ajzen I.
From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. , eds. Springer series in social psychology. Berlin: Springer, 1985:11–39.
19. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al.
User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart
20. Merton RK, Rossi AS.
Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In: Merton RK, editor. , ed. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press, 1950:279–334.
21. Homans GC.
The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1950.
22. Burt RS.
Cohesion versus structural equivalence as a basis for network subgroups. Sociol Methods Res
23. Burt RS.
Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol
24. Anderson JG, Jay SJ.
Computers and clinical judgment: the role of physician networks. Soc Sci Med
25. Rice RE, Aydin C.
Attitudes toward new organizational technology: network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Adm Sci Q
26. Christakis NA, Fowler JH.
The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med
2007;357:370–9. [PubMed] 27. Christakis NA, Fowler JH.
The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med
2008;358:2249–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 28. Fowler JH, Christakis NA.
Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ
2008;337:a2338. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 29. Scott J, Tallia A, Crosson JC, et al.
Social network analysis as an analytic tool for interaction patterns in primary care practices. Ann Fam Med
2005;3:443–8. [PubMed] 30. Keating NL, Ayanian JZ, Cleary PD, et al.
Factors affecting influential discussions among physicians: a social network analysis of a primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med
2007;22:794–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 31. Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Georgiou A, et al.
Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2007;14:746–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 32. Merrill J, Hripcsak G.
Using social network analysis within a department of biomedical informatics to induce a discussion of academic communities of practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2008;15:780–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Gibbons DE.
Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Adm Sci Q
34. Zheng K, Padman R, Johnson MP, et al.
An adoption study of a clinical reminder system in ambulatory care using a developmental trajectory approach. Stud Health Technol Inform
2004;107:1115–19. [PubMed] 35. Zheng K, Padman R, Johnson MP, et al.
An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2009;16:228–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 36. Cork RD, Detmer WM, Friedman CP.
Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J Am Med Inform Assoc
1998;5:164–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Wasserman S, Faust K.
Social network analysis: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
38. Freeman LC.
A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry
39. Breiger R, Boorman S, Arabie P.
An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. J Math Psychol
40. Krackhardt D.
Predicting with networks: noparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Soc Networks
41. Doreian P.
Linear models with spatially distributed data. Sociol Methods Res
42. Leenders RTAJ.
Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix. Soc Networks
43. Bonacich P.
Factoring and weighting approaches to clique identification. J Math Sociol
44. Robinson MD, Clore GL.
Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychol Bull
2002;128:934–60. [PubMed] 45. Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK.
Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science
46. Merton RK.
The unanticipated consequences of purposive action. Am Sociol Rev
47. Berman EM, West JP, Richter MN.
Workplace relations: friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Admin Rev
48. Shah PP.
Network destruction: the structural implications of downsizing. Acad Manage J
49. Burkhardt ME.
Social interaction effects following a technological change: a longitudinal investigation. Acad Manage J
50. Bass BM.
Bass and Stodgill's handbook of leadership. 3rd edn
New York: Free Press, 1990.
51. Boyd NG, Taylor RR.
A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader-follower relationships. Leadership Quart
52. Gifford DR, Holloway RG, Frankel MR, et al.
Improving adherence to dementia guidelines through education and opinion leaders. a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med
1999;131:237–46. [PubMed] 53. Valente TW.
Opinion leader interventions in social networks. BMJ
2006;333:1082–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 54. Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Dykstra R, et al.
Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people. Int J Med Inf
2003;69:235–50. [PubMed] 55. Halbesleben JR, Wakefield DS, Ward MM, et al.
The relationship between super users' attitudes and employee experiences with clinical information systems. Med Care Res Rev
2009;66:82–96. [PubMed] 56. Locock L, Dopson S, Chambers D, et al.
Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness. Soc Sci Med
2001;53:745–57. [PubMed] 57. Gaither CA, Bagozzi RP, Ascione FJ, et al.
A reasoned action approach to physicians' utilization of drug information sources. Pharm Res
58. Succi MJ, Walter ZD.
Theory of user acceptance of information technologies: An examination of health care professionals. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference, 1999. Washington DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 1999.
59. Venkatesh V, Davis FD.
A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Mgmt Sci
60. Chau PYK, Hu PJH.
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decision Sci
61. Chismar WG, Wiley-Patton S.
Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics. Proc AMIA Symp
2002;155–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 62. Gagnon MP, Godin G, Gagné C, et al.
An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int J Med Inf
2003;71:103–15. [PubMed] 63. Wu JH, Shen WS, Lin LM, et al.
Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system. Int J Qual Health Care
2008;20:123–9. [PubMed] 64. Kuo D, Gifford DR, Stein MD.
Curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists. JAMA
65. Beatty PC, Beatty SF.
Anaesthetists'intentions to violate safety guidelines. Anaesthesia
66. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M.
Getting evidence into clinical practice: an organisational behaviour perspective. J Health Serv Res Policy
67. Zheng K, Padman R, Johnson MP, et al.
Evaluation of healthcare IT applications: the user acceptance perspective. In: Vaidya S, Jain LC, Yoshida H, editors. , eds. Advanced computational intelligence paradigms in healthcare. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2007;2:49–78.