1. Pan E, Johnston D, Adler-Milstein J, et al.
The Value of Healthcare Information Exchange and Interoperability. Boston, MA: Center for Information Technology Leadership, 2004.
2. Blumenthal D, DesRoches C, Donelan K, et al.
Health Information Technology in the United States: The Information Base for Progress. Boston, MA: Institute for Health Policy, George Washington University Medical Center, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2006.
3. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E.
Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The nature of patient care information system related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2004;11:104–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 4. Estabrooks C, O'Leary K, Ricker K, et al.
The Internet and Access to Evidence: How are nurses positioned?
J Adv Nurs
5. Gioia DA.
Symbols, scripts and sensemaking: Creating meaning in the organizational experience. In: Sims HP, Gioia DA, editors. , eds. The thinking organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986:49–74.
6. Harrison M, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S.
Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care—an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2007;14:542–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC.
Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM T Inform Syst
8. Murff H, Kannry J.
Physician Satisfaction with Two Order Entry Systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2001;8:499–511. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 9. Moen A, Brennan PF.
HEALTH@HOME: The Work of health information management in the household (HIMH): Implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2005;12:648–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Elsbach KD, Barr PS, Hargadon AB.
Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organ Sci
11. Chattopadhyay P, Glick WH, Huber GP.
Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Acad Manage J
12. National Progress Report on E-Prescribing. Washington, DC: SureScripts, 2007.
13. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Seger AC, et al.
Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J Gen Intern Med
2005;20:837–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 14. Gandhi T, Weingart S, Borus J, et al.
Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med
2003;348:1556–64. [PubMed] 15. Fischer MA, Vogeli C, Stedman M, et al.
Effect of Electronic Prescribing With Formulary Decision Support on Medication Use and Cost. Arch Intern Med
2008;168:2433–9. [PubMed] 16. Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, et al.
Physician Inpatient Order Writing on Microcomputer Workstations: Effects on resource utilization. JAMA
19. Friedman CP, Wyatt JC.
Subjectivist approaches to evaluations. In: Friedman CP, Wyatt JC, editors. , eds. Evaluation methods in medical informatics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997:205–21.
20. Morgan DL.
Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd edn
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.
21. Sofaer S.
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?
Health Serv Res
1999;34(5 Part 2):1101–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
Qualitative Methods in health research: opportunities and considerations in application and review. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 1999. Report No: 02-5046.
23. Dubé L, Paré G.
Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quart
24. Silverman D.
Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage, 1993.
25. Hammersley M, Atkinson P.
Ethnography: principle in practice. London: Tavistock, 1983.
26. Bernard H.
Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 2001.
27. Atkinson P.
The ethnography of a medical setting: reading, writing and rhetoric. Qual Health Res
28. Weber M.
Methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press, 1949.
29. Robinson WS.
The logical structure of analytic induction. Am Sociol Rev
30. Gilgun J.
We shared something special: the moral discourse of incest perpetrators. J Marr Fam
31. Tobin G, Begley C.
Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs
2004;48:388–96. [PubMed] 32. Fisher B.
The revolution in breast cancer surgery: science or anecdotalism?
World J Surg
33. Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V.
Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart
34. Iacono S, Kling R.
Changing office technologies and transformations of clerical jobs: a historical perspective. In: Kraut RE, editor. , ed. Technology and the Transformation of White-Collar Work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987:53–75.
35. Koch C.
Off the chart: CIO Magazine, 2003.
36. Lapointe L, Rivard S.
A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quart
37. Christensen CM.
The innovator's dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
38. Adner R.
When are technologies disruptive? a demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Manage J
39. Debruyne M, Reibstein DJ.
Competitor see, competitor do: incumbent entry in new market niches. Mark Sci
40. King A, Tucci CL.
Incumbent entry into new market niches: the role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Manage Sci
41. Block L, Keller P.
When to accentuate the negative: the effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. J Mark Res
42. Levin I, Schneider S, Gaeth G.
All Frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process
1998;76:149–88. [PubMed] 43. Brown SH, Coney RD.
Changes in physicians' computer anxiety and attitudes related to clinical information system use. J Am Med Inform Assoc
1994;1:381–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 44. Larum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A.
Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey. BMJ
2001;323:1344–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Marakas G, Hornik S.
Passive resistance misuse: overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementation. Eur J Inform Syst
46. Electronic Prescribing Becoming Mainstream Practice
A collaborative report from the eHealth Initiative and the Center for Improving Medication Management. Washington, DC and Alexandria, VA: eHI and CIMM, 2008.
47. Guba EG.
Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ Commun Technol J
48. Guba EG, Lincoln YS.
Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.