Activation of skeletal muscle involves a series of events collectively known as excitation–contraction coupling (
Costantin, 1976;
Dirksen, 2002;
Dulhunty, 2006). The endplate potential generates an action potential that rapidly propagates along the sarcolemma, travels down the transverse tubule (T-tubule) system into the center of the muscle fiber, and subsequently activates voltage sensor dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) that trigger calcium release used to drive muscle contraction. The T-tubule system ensures rapid and uniform activation of the entire muscle fiber. However, repeated action potentials during high frequency stimulation can result in significant potassium accumulation within the diffusion-limited T-tubular space (
Furman and Barchi, 1977;
Kirsch et al., 1977;
Almers, 1980;
Neelands et al., 2001). Because the potassium equilibrium potential (
EK) sets the skeletal muscle resting potential (−90 mV) (
Hodgkin and Horowicz, 1959), an accumulation of extracellular potassium can result in membrane depolarization sufficient to activate voltage-gated sodium channels to trigger after-discharges (
Adrian and Bryant, 1974;
Cannon et al., 1993). Sustained bursts of after-discharges result in slowed muscle relaxation (myotonia). A large muscle chloride conductance (
GCl), determined primarily by ClC-1 channels (
Lueck et al., 2007a,
b), serves to “short circuit” depolarization as a result of potassium accumulation by stabilizing the skeletal muscle resting membrane potential around
ECl (also approximately −90 mV) (
Aromataris and Rychkov, 2006;
Allen et al., 2008). This powerful membrane potential stabilization effect is possible because
GCl comprises ~80% of the total resting membrane conductance in mammalian skeletal muscle (
Hutter and Padsha, 1959;
Aromataris and Rychkov, 2006). The importance of proper ClC-1 channel function in skeletal muscle function is highlighted by the fact that both ClC-1 gene mutations (
Pusch, 2002) and aberrant ClC-1 premRNA splicing (
Mankodi et al., 2002) result in myotonic disorders. Given its role in human pathophysiology, the biophysical properties of wild-type (WT) and mutated ClC-1 channels have been extensively characterized in heterologous expression systems. However, a long-standing controversy exists regarding the subcellular localization, sarcolemma or T-tubular system, of chloride channels in native mammalian skeletal muscle.
The first study to investigate the subcellular localization of the
GCl was performed by
Hodgkin and Horowicz (1960) in amphibian skeletal muscle. In this hallmark study, the membrane potential was measured during rapid changes in extracellular potassium and chloride ([K
+]
o and [Cl
−]
o, respectively). Interestingly, changes in [Cl
−]
o affected the membrane potential more rapidly than [K
+]
o. From these findings, it was concluded that K
+-sensitive sites are less accessible than Cl
−-sensitive sites. With astonishing forethought, Hodgkin and Horowicz hypothesized that K
+ sites are located in a system of tubules and vesicles of the sarcolemma (
Bennett and Porter, 1953;
Edwards and Ruska, 1955;
Porter and Palade, 1957;
Huxley and Taylor, 1958), which are now called the T-tubule system (
Andersson-Cedergren, 1959), whereas the bulk of the chloride conductance originates in the sarcolemma. Subsequent measurements of changes in
GCl in frog skeletal muscle (
Eisenberg and Gage, 1969) and myotonia in goat skeletal muscle (
Adrian and Bryant, 1974) after detubulation also supported the notion that the majority of ClC-1 channels are located in the sarcolemma. Moreover,
Gurnett et al. (1995) used biochemical/immunofluorescence approaches and a C-terminal ClC-1 antibody to show that ClC-1 channels localize exclusively to the sarcolemma in mouse skeletal muscle. In contrast,
Palade and Barchi (1977) and
Dulhunty (1979) found that
GCl was markedly reduced in mammalian skeletal muscle after detubulation using glycerol-induced osmotic shock, consistent with a significant localization within the T-tubule system. More recently, based on mechanically skinned mammalian and amphibian muscle fiber preparations, Lamb and colleagues also concluded that the majority of the
GCl is localized within the T-tubular system (
Coonan and Lamb, 1998;
Dutka et al., 2008).
The aim of the current study was to determine the subcellular localization of functional ClC-1 channels in mouse skeletal muscle. Results from three complementary approaches (including electrophysiological characterization of macroscopic ClC-1 currents before and after detubulation, immunolocalization of native channels, and in vivo expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged ClC-1 channels in DM1 muscle) provide strong evidence that functional ClC-1 channels in adult mouse skeletal muscle reside exclusively within the sarcolemma.