PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of molvisLink to Publisher's site
 
Mol Vis. 2010; 16: 2354–2361.
Published online 2010 November 9.
PMCID: PMC2994732

Blocking neuropilin-2 enhances corneal allograft survival by selectively inhibiting lymphangiogenesis on vascularized beds

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the potential inhibitory effects of RNA interference-mediated knockdown of neuropilin-2 (NP2) on inflammation-induced corneal hemangiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, and whether selective inhibition of lymphangiogenesis on vascularized recipient beds before transplantation improves the graft survival.

Methods

Mouse lymphatic endothelial cells were transfected with the plasmid expressing artificial microRNA (amiRNA) against mouse NP2, and the down-regulation of VEGF-C-induced NP2 expression by NP2 amiRNA was evaluated by real-time PCR and western blot assays. Next, NP2 amiRNA or negative control amiRNA was injected intrastromally into BALB/c mouse model of suture-induced corneal neovascularization three days after surgery. Corneas were harvested 1 week after suture placement and the formation of lymphatic and blood vessels as well as the recruitment of macrophage was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. The neovascularized graft beds treated by NP2 amiRNA or control then served as recipients of orthotopic corneal transplants, and age-matched C57BL/6 donors were used. Corneal allografts were examined twice a week for 8 weeks, and graft clarity was quantified by means of an opacity score.

Results

VEGF-C-induced NP2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels was significantly suppressed by NP2 amiRNA in mouse lymphatic endothelial cells. Intrastromal administration of NP2 amiRNA reduced corneal lymphangiogenesis by 45% versus control (p=0.015), but corneal hemangiogenesis (p=0.815) and the recruitment of CD11 antigen-like family member B (CD11b)-positive macrophage (p=0.589) were unchanged. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a better graft survival rate in the vascularized recipient beds pre-treated by NP2 amiRNA in comparison to controls (p=0.014).

Conclusions

Knockdown of NP2 improves corneal graft survival by selectively inhibiting lymphangiogenesis in vascularized beds before transplantation. Thus our results open new treatment options for transplant rejection and other lymphatic disorders.

Introduction

Currently corneal transplantation is the only treatment for many severe cornea diseases including corneal injury, infection, degeneration and inherited diseases. The 5-year survival rate of low-risk keratoplasty (with a preoperatively avascular recipient bed) is around 90%, even without human leukocyte antigen matching [1]. In contrast, the survival rate of high-risk keratoplasty (with a pathologically prevascularized corneal bed) decreases significantly to below 50% due to immune-mediated rejection [2,3]. Preexisting corneal blood (hemangiogenesis) and lymphatic (lymphangiogenesis) vessels in recipient beds have been identified as strong risk factors for immune rejection following corneal transplantation [3,4]. The blood vasculature drains oxygen, nutrients, and cells to corneas whereas the lymphatic vessels transport donor-derived antigen-presenting cells and antigenic materials to the draining lymph nodes, thus inducing an immune response against an allogeneic transplant [5]. Recent studies on corneal hemangiogenesis has demonstrated that anti-hemangiogenic strategies may promote graft survival both in the low-risk as well as in the high-risk murine corneal transplantation [6,7]. Nevertheless, several studies suggest that lymphangiogenesis plays an important role in the induction of alloimmunity after organ transplantation [5]. Using the murine model of corneal transplantation, it was shown that afferent corneal lymphatics may be equal, or even more important than efferent corneal blood vessels in modulating allograft rejection [8].

Although endogenous lymphangiogenic inhibitors remain to be discovered, several secreted factors that promote corneal lymphangiogenesis have been identified recently, including members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family [9], fibroblast growth factor-2 [10], angiopoietin [11], platelet derived growth factor–BB [12], hepatocyte growth factor [13], and insulin-like growth factors [14]. Among these corneal lymphangiogenic factors, lymphatic growth factors VEGF-C and its receptor vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-3 are best studied. VEGFR-3 has been shown to be expressed in corneal epithelium [15] and corneal dendritic cells [16], and VEGFR-3 expression is upregulated in inflamed corneas [17]. Anti-lymphangiogenic strategies targeting VEGFR-3-mediated signaling specifically inhibit lymphangiogenesis in inflammatory corneal neovascularisation [18] and significantly suppress corneal transplant rejection [17]. VEGF-C, a ligand of VEGFR-3, has been shown to be able to induce lymphatic vessel growth in the cornea [9,10]. In addition, VEGF-C is upregulated by proinflammatory cytokines in macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils and mast cells [19], suggesting that it stimulates lymphatic vessel growth during inflammation.

Neuropilin-2 (NP2) is a transmembrane protein initially identified as a receptor for class-3 semaphorin subfamily for neuronal guidance [20]. However, NP2 also acts as a co-receptor for VEGF-C [21] and is implicated in embryonic vessel development [22]. More recent studies have revealed that NP2 functions in tumor lymphangiogenesis and tumor metastasis [23]. This raises the intriguing possibility that NP2 may be a modulator of corneal lymphangiogenesis and that interfering with the afferent arm of the immune response by blocking NP2 may reduce the risk of corneal graft rejection.

Therefore, in this study, we employed artificial microRNA (amiRNA) to knockdown NP2 in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) and further achieved selective inhibition of lymphangiogenesis in suture-induced vascularized corneal beds by intracorneal administration of NP2 amiRNA. Finally we established a mouse model of high-risk orthotopic corneal transplantation to demonstrate that selective inhibition of lymphangiogenesis mediated by NP2 knockdown led to improved high-risk graft survival on vascularized recipient beds before transplantation.

Methods

Construction of plasmid

Using the Invitrogen’s RNAi web design tool, we designed a potential mouse NP2-specific targeting sequence as described previously [24]. A BLAST analysis was performed to ensure the designed sequence would have no substantial homology to sequences in other vertebrate genes. The sequence of oligonucleotides was shown in Figure 1A. These oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated into the pcDNATM6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to construct NP2-targeting amiRNA (NP2-amiR). The negative control plasmid, negative amiRNA (neg-amiR; Invitrogen), was created using a sequence predicted not to target any known vertebrate genes.

Figure 1
NP2-targeting artificial microRNA (amiRNA) down-regulates VEGF-C induced NP2 expression in mouse LECs. A: Double-stranded oligonucleotide encoding a pre-miRNA against mouse NP2. B: Mouse LECs were transfected with NP2-targeting amiRNA (NP2-amiR), negative ...

Cell culture and transfection

The mouse LECs were kindly provided by Dr. Annunciata Vecchi (Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy) and cultured as described previously [25]. Cells at passages 14–16 were selected for further experiments. One day before transfection, 1.5×105 cells were seeded into 6-well plates. The cells were then transfected with NP2-amiR or neg-amiR using Lipofectamine PLUS reagent (Invitrogen) and selected with 5 ug/ml blasticidin (Invitrogen). The mouse LECs were then stimulated by 200 ng/ml VEGF-C (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), and quantitative real-time PCR and western blot were performed 6 h after stimulation.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Total RNA (500 ng) was reverse transcribed for 45 min at 45 °C using TaKaRa RNA PCR Kit (AMV) Ver.3.0 (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). EvaGreen quantitative PCR was performed in an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Synthesized cDNA (1 μl) of each reaction was used in a 25 μl reaction volume containing 1.25 ul of EvaGreenTM dye (Biotium, Hayward, CA). Results were derived from the comparative threshold cycle method and normalized by glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal control. The following primers were used for real-time PCR: NP2, 5′-GTG TAC GAC CAT GCC AAG TG-3′ (sense), 5′-TGA CCC AAA GGA GTT TGC TT-3′ (antisense); GAPDH, 5′-GTA TT GGG CGC CTG GTC ACC-3′ (sense), 5′-CGC TCC TGG AAG ATG GTG ATG G-3′ (antisense).

Western blot analysis

Total protein extracts were prepared by washing cells with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysing in ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) with the addition of protease inhibitors. After separation by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE, proteins were electro-transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated in blocking solution (2% BSA in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature, then incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-NP2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) overnight at 4 °C. After washing and blocking, the membranes were further incubated with corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated second antibody for 1 h at room temperature, and developed using enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagents (Applygen Technologies Inc., Beijing, China). Quantitative analysis of the bands was performed with LabWorksTM Image Acquisition and Analysis Software (GDS-8000 system; UVP, Cambridge, UK).

Animals and anesthesia

Six- to eight-week-old male BALB/c and C57BL6 mice were purchased from the Institute of Tumor Research (Harbin, China). Animals were treated in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Mice were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine and xylazine (120 mg/kg bodyweight and 20 mg/kg bodyweight, respectively).

Suture-induced corneal neovascularization and corneal intrastromal injections

Inflammatory corneal neovascularization was induced by corneal suture placement, as described previously [26] with some modifications. Briefly, a 2-mm corneal trephine was gently placed on the cornea to mark the central corneal area. Eight interrupted 11–0 nylon sutures (Huawei, Hangzhou, China) were placed in the site where the corneal trephine marked. Corneal sutures were removed after 7 days. The in vivo delivery of NP2-amiR or neg-amiR to the cornea was performed as described previously [27]. Briefly, 1.0 ug plasmid in 2 ul of PBS was injected into the corneal stroma using a 33-gauge Hamilton syringe (Hamilton Co., Reno, NV). Injections were performed on day 3 after suture placement. One week later, penetrating corneal transplantations were performed using age-matched C57BL/6 donors.

High-risk corneal transplantation and the evaluation of graft survival

Mouse orthotopic corneal penetrating keratoplasty was performed as described previously [4]. Briefly, the central corneal area of C57BL6 donor was excised using a 2.0-mm mouse trephine and Vannas scissiors. The prevascularized graft bed of BALB/c recipient was also prepared by trephining the right eye and the donor graft was sewn into place using 8 interrupted 11–0 nylon sutures (Sharppoint; Vanguard, Houston, Tex). Corneal transplant sutures were removed after 7 days and grafts were then examined by slitlamp microscopy twice weekly over 56 days. All grafted eyes with surgical complications (hyphema, cataract, infection, significant anterior synechiae, or loss of anterior chamber) were excluded from the study. The degree of corneal grafts for opacity was graded and the survival rates were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis [28]. Grafts with an opacity score of 2 or higher after 2 weeks or an opacity score of 3 or higher at 2 weeks were regarded as rejected.

Immunohistochemistry

Corneal whole mount preparations were done as previously described [7]. Briefly, corneas were dissected from the eye behind the corneal limbus, rinsed in PBS and fixed in acetone for 1 h at room temperature. Then the corneas were washed in PBS and blocked in 2% BSA in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. Afterward, the corneas were incubated with rabbit anti-mouse LYVE-1 antibody (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4 °C. On the 2nd day, the tissue was washed, blocked and stained with FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD31 antibody (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) overnight at 4 °C. On the 3rd day, the specimens were incubated with CY3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit second antibody (1:100; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) for 1 h at room temperature. To detect the recruitment of macrophages into the inflamed cornea, FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD11b antibody (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) was used. To ensure specificity, negative controls were performed by omitting the primary antibody. Fluorescence microscopy and photography was done using the BX51 camera (Olympus Optical Co., Hamburg, Germany). The immunofluorescence was quantified using NIH Image software.

Determination of NP2 levels by ELISA

Corneas harvested for ELISA were homogenized in 1.0 ml of sterile PBS containing 0.05% v/v Triton-X 100 at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, and total protein was determined with a Bradford protein assay. The level of NP2 in corneal lysates was determined by ELISA kit for murine NP2 (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All measurements were performed in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The differences between groups were compared by using Student’s t-test for all in vitro studies and the Mann–Whitney U test for all in vivo studies. A p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

NP2-targeting amiRNA suppresses VEGF-C-induced NP2 expression in mouse LECs

Western blot assay demonstrated that NP2-amiR but not negative control neg-amiR specially inhibited NP2 expression in mouse LECs stimulated by VEGF-C (Figure 1B). Furthermore, real-time quantitative PCR assay confirmed the significant inhibition of NP2 mRNA expression in NP2-amiR treated cells compared with parental control cells (p=0.005, Figure 1C).

Intrastromal delivery of NP2-targeting amiRNA suppresses corneal NP2 expression

To further evaluate whether NP2-amiR could inhibit NP2 expression in vivo, corneas were subjected to intrastromal delivery of NP2-amiR and harvested on day 7 after suture placement. NP2 ELISA showed that NP2 concentration was 591.14±57.51 pg/ml in saline control mice, 605.58±52.58 pg/ml in neg-amiR treated mice (p=0.606, compared to control), and 372.62±50.89 pg/ml in mice injected with NP2-amiR (p=0.031, compared to control, Figure 1D). These data confirmed that the intrastromal delivery of NP2-amiR resulted in reduced NP2 expression.

Intrastromal delivery of NP2-targeting amiRNA inhibits corneal lymphangiogenesis

Corneal suture placement induced a robust neovascular response which emerged from day 3 and reached suture placement sites at day 7 after suture injury (Figure 2A-C). We investigated the effect of intrastromal injection of NP2-amiR on the outgrowth of blood and lymphatic vessels in the suture-induced corneal neovascularisation assay. The densities of Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (CD31)-positive blood vessels and lymphatic vessel endothelial receptor-1 (LYVE-1)-positive lymphatic vessels were detected by immunohistochemistry on day 7 (Figure 2D-L). Quantitative immunohistochemical and morphometric analyses revealed that the number of lymphatic vessels in mice treated with NP2-amiR was significantly decreased (p=0.015), whereas the number of blood vessels showed no changes, in comparison with saline control (p=0.815, Figure 2M).

Figure 2
Intrastromal injection of NP2-targeting amiRNA inhibits suture-induced corneal lymphangiogenesis but not hemangiogenesis. A-C: Representative images showing that corneal suture injury induced a robust neovascular response seven days after injury. D-L ...

Intrastromal delivery of NP2-targeting amiRNA has no effect on cell infiltration

To determine the effect of reduced NP2 expression on cell infiltration associated with corneal suture injury in recipient beds immediately before transplantation, we next examined CD11 antigen-like family member B (CD11b)-positive macrophage infiltration into inflamed corneas in mice treated with NP2-amiR. As shown in Figure 3, there was no significant difference in the number of inflammatory cells between mice treated with NP2-amiR and control mice (p=0.589).

Figure 3
Intrastromal injection of NP2-targeting amiRNA has no effect on the recruitment of macrophage into the cornea. A: Immunohistochemical staining for CD11b in corneal whole-mounts (n=6 mice per group). Original magnification, 200×. B: Quantitative ...

Intrastromal delivery of NP2-targeting amiRNA in the recipient bed before transplantation significantly promotes subsequent graft survival

The fact that afferent corneal lymphatics plays a crucial role in allograft rejection [8], together with our data that blockade of NP2 selectively inhibited corneal lymphangiogenesis, prompted us to investigate whether knockdown of NP2 could improve corneal allograft survival. Results from Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed significantly prolonged graft survival in the recipient beds pretreated with NP2-amiR, relative to control beds injected with saline solution (p=0.014, Figure 4).

Figure 4
Effect of NP2 inhibition by NP2-amiR on survival of high-risk allogeneic corneal transplants. Kaplan–Meier analysis showing significant improvement of corneal graft survival in BALB/c corneal beds pretreated with NP2-amiR (n=13) before transplantation ...

Discussion

Increasing evidence suggests that NP2, a coreceptor for VEGFC, emerges as a potent regulator of lymphangiogenesis in embryonic vessel development, tumor lymphangiogenesis and metastasis. However, the effect of NP2 blockade on immunomodulation following transplantation has not been investigated. To our knowledge, our findings for the first time demonstrate that RNA interference-mediated blockade of NP2 is a potential therapeutic avenue to improve corneal allograft survival by selective inhibition of lymphangiogenesis on vascularized recipient beds before transplantation.

Afferent lymphatic vessels (afferent arm of the immune reflex arc), efferent blood vessels (efferent arm of the immune reflex arc) and antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages play major roles in the process of immunomodulation after corneal transplantation. However, in severe corneal inflammatory disease, corneal lymphatic vessels and blood vessels often grow in parallel into the cornea [29], which makes it difficult to separate lymphangiogenesis from hemangiogenesis. Whether hemangiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis contribute equally to corneal transplant rejection has not been well studied, largely due to the difficulty in selectively dissecting the individual contributions of these two closely intermingled components. Our results suggest NP2 knockdown as an effective strategy for specific inhibition of lymphangiogenesis without obvious effects on hemangiogenesis. Furthermore, NP2 is not expressed in corneal macrophage (data not shown), and NP2 knockdown had no apparent effect on the macrophages recruitment into vascularized beds at the time of corneal transplantation. These data demonstrate that decreasing NP2 expression has no direct effect on corneal macrophages trafficking to regional lymph nodes, and further confirm the selective effect of NP2 knockdown in the inflamed cornea. In the aggregate, our findings indicate that NP2-targeting amiRNA may represent a novel tool to investigate the individual properties of hem- or lymphangiogenesis. More importantly, our results indicate that inhibition of NP2 provides novel treatment options for disorders associated with pathological lymphangiogenesis without causing the corresponding complications induced by anti-hemangiogenic effect.

In addition, our data showed that selective inhibition of lymphangiogenesis on vascularized recipient beds before transplantation by blockade of NP2 led to significantly improved graft survival. Afferent lymphatic vessels act as a conduit through which antigen-presenting cells and soluble antigenic materials migrate to the draining lymph nodes to induce an immune rejection [5]. Suppression of lymphangiogenesis in the graft bed by NP2 knockdown may reduce the opportunity of donor-derived immune cells to enter the lymphatic vascular system, thus mitigating the immune response against an allogeneic transplant and leading to better graft survival. This is in line with the finding that the absence of lymphatic vessels before transplantation significantly promoted subsequent graft survival using VEGFR-3 Abs or anti-integrin a5 small molecules [30]. These observations, together with our current findings, led us to postulate that corneal allograft survival can be significantly improved by the reduction of lymphatic vessels in the recipient bed alone. Interestingly, NP2 is actively involved in the regulation of lymphatic vasculature by modulating VEGFR-3 signaling [31], and blocking VEGFR-3 decreases corneal dendritic cell trafficking to regional lymph nodes in a mouse corneal transplantation model [17]. Thus we speculate that loss of NP2 promotes allograft survival at least in part by inhibiting dendritic cell trafficking through VEGFR-3-mediated signaling.

Besides the new therapeutic use for improving corneal graft survival, our data also reveal NP2-targeting amiRNA as a promising treatment in solid organ transplantation, as it does not affect the blood supply, which is essential for wound healing, nutrition, and homeostasis of the graft. Furthermore, selective anti-lymphangiogenic therapy might be an optional strategy in other diseases such as lymphatic vascular malformations, lymphatic neoplasms, tumor lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastases.

Collectively, our results demonstrate that intracorneal administration of NP2-targeting amiRNA selectively inhibited lymphangiogenesis without affecting hemangiogenesis and macrophages recruitment, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a better graft survival rate in the NP2-targeting amiRNA treated vascularized corneal beds before transplantation. These data open new treatment options for transplant rejection and other lymphatic disorders.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Yuyan Ma and Yanmei Yang for their advice on cell culture and statistics analysis. We thank Xiaoguang Li and Ming Fu for their excellent technical assistance. We thank Prof. Annunciata Vecchi for the kind gift of the mouse LECs.

References

1. Küchle M, Cursiefen C, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Wenkel H, Martus P, Naumann GO. Risk factors for corneal allograft rejection: intermediate results of a prospective normal-risk keratoplasty study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:580–4. [PubMed]
2. Dana MR, Streilein JW. Loss and restoration of immune privilege in eyes with corneal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2485–94. [PubMed]
3. Maguire MG, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Fink NE, Schwartz A. Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1536–47. [PubMed]
4. Sonoda Y, Streilein JW. Orthotopic corneal transplantation in mice–evidence that the immunogenetic rules of rejection do not apply. Transplantation. 1992;54:694–704. [PubMed]
5. Cursiefen C, Chen L, Dana MR, Streilein JW. Corneal lymphangiogenesis: evidence, mechanisms, and implications for corneal transplant immunology. Cornea. 2003;22:273–81. [PubMed]
6. Bachmann BO, Bock F, Wiegand SJ, Maruyama K, Dana MR, Kruse FE, Luetjen-Drecoll E, Cursiefen C. Promotion of graft survival by vascular endothelial growth factor a neutralization after high-risk corneal transplantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:71–7. [PubMed]
7. Cursiefen C, Cao J, Chen L, Liu Y, Maruyama K, Jackson D, Kruse FE, Wiegand SJ, Dana MR, Streilein JW. Inhibition of hemangiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis after normal-risk corneal transplantation by neutralizing VEGF promotes graft survival. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2666–73. [PubMed]
8. Yamagami S, Dana MR, Tsuru T. Draining lymph nodes play an essential role in alloimmunity generated in response to high-risk corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2002;21:405–9. [PubMed]
9. Cursiefen C, Chen L, Borges LP, Jackson D, Cao J, Radziejewski C, D'Amore PA, Dana MR, Wiegand SJ, Streilein JW. VEGF-A stimulates lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis in inflammatory neovascularization via macrophage recruitment. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1040–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Kubo H, Cao R, Brakenhielm E, Makinen T, Cao Y, Alitalo K. Blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 signaling inhibits fibroblast growth factor-2-induced lymphangiogenesis in mouse cornea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:8868–73. [PubMed]
11. Nguyen VP, Chen SH, Trinh J, Kim H, Coomber BL, Dumont DJ. Differential response of lymphatic, venous and arterial endothelial cells to angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Cao R, Bjorndahl MA, Religa P, Clasper S, Garvin S, Galter D, Meister B, Ikomi F, Tritsaris K, Dissing S, Ohhashi T, Jackson DG, Cao Y. PDGF-BB induces intratumoral lymphangiogenesis and promotes lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:333–45. [PubMed]
13. Cao R, Bjorndahl MA, Gallego MI, Chen S, Religa P, Hansen AJ, Cao Y. Hepatocyte growth factor is a lymphangiogenic factor with an indirect mechanism of action. Blood. 2006;107:3531–6. [PubMed]
14. Björndahl M, Cao R, Nissen LJ, Clasper S, Johnson LA, Xue Y, Zhou Z, Jackson D, Hansen AJ, Cao Y. Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 induce lymphangiogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15593–8. [PubMed]
15. Cursiefen C, Chen L, Saint-Geniez M, Hamrah P, Jin Y, Rashid S, Pytowski B, Persaud K, Wu Y, Streilein JW, Dana R. Nonvascular VEGF receptor 3 expression by corneal epithelium maintains avascularity and vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:11405–10. [PubMed]
16. Hamrah P, Chen L, Zhang Q, Dana MR. Novel expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-3 and VEGF-C on corneal dendritic cells. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:57–68. [PubMed]
17. Chen L, Hamrah P, Cursiefen C, Zhang Q, Pytowski B, Streilein JW, Dana MR. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 mediates induction of corneal alloimmunity. Nat Med. 2004;10:813–5. [PubMed]
18. Bock F, Onderka J, Dietrich T, Bachmann B, Pytowski B, Cursiefen C. Blockade of VEGFR3-signalling specifically inhibits lymphangiogenesis in inflammatory corneal neovascularisation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:115–9. [PubMed]
19. Flister MJ, Wilber A, Hall KL, Iwata C, Miyazono K, Nisato RE, Pepper MS, Zawieja DC, Ran S. Inflammation induces lymphangiogenesis through up-regulation of VEGFR-3 mediated by NF-kappaB and Prox1. Blood. 2010;115:418–29. [PubMed]
20. Chen H, Chedotal A, He Z, Goodman CS, Tessier-Lavigne M. Neuropilin-2, a novel member of the neuropilin family, is a high affinity receptor for the semaphorins Sema E and Sema IV but not Sema III. Neuron. 1997;19:547–59. [PubMed]
21. Karkkainen MJ, Saaristo A, Jussila L, Karila KA, Lawrence EC, Pajusola K, Bueler H, Eichmann A, Kauppinen R, Kettunen MI, Yla-Herttuala S, Finegold DN, Ferrell RE, Alitalo K. A model for gene therapy of human hereditary lymphedema. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:12677–82. [PubMed]
22. Yuan L, Moyon D, Pardanaud L, Breant C, Karkkainen MJ, Alitalo K, Eichmann A. Abnormal lymphatic vessel development in neuropilin 2 mutant mice. Development. 2002;129:4797–806. [PubMed]
23. Caunt M, Mak J, Liang WC, Stawicki S, Pan Q, Tong RK, Kowalski J, Ho C, Reslan HB, Ross J, Berry L, Kasman I, Zlot C, Cheng Z, Le Couter J, Filvaroff EH, Plowman G, Peale F, French D, Carano R, Koch AW, Wu Y, Watts RJ, Tessier-Lavigne M, Bagri A. Blocking neuropilin-2 function inhibits tumor cell metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:331–42. [PubMed]
24. Liang Z, Wu H, Reddy S, Zhu A, Wang S, Blevins D, Yoon Y, Zhang Y, Shim H. Blockade of invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells via targeting CXCR4 with an artificial microRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;363:542–6. [PubMed]
25. Sironi M, Conti A, Bernasconi S, Fra AM, Pasqualini F, Nebuloni M, Lauri E, De Bortoli M, Mantovani A, Dejana E, Vecchi A. Generation and characterization of a mouse lymphatic endothelial cell line. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;325:91–100. [PubMed]
26. Cho WG, Albuquerque RJ, Kleinman ME, Tarallo V, Greco A, Nozaki M, Green MG, Baffi JZ, Ambati BK, De Falco M, Alexander JS, Brunetti A, De Falco S, Ambati J. Small interfering RNA-induced TLR3 activation inhibits blood and lymphatic vessel growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:7137–42. [PubMed]
27. Stechschulte SU, Joussen AM, von Recum HA, Poulaki V, Moromizato Y, Yuan J, D'Amato RJ, Kuo C, Adamis AP. Rapid ocular angiogenic control via naked DNA delivery to cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1975–9. [PubMed]
28. Yamagami S, Dana MR. The critical role of lymph nodes in corneal alloimmunization and graft rejection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1293–8. [PubMed]
29. Cursiefen C, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kuchle M, Sorokin L, Breiteneder-Geleff S, Alitalo K, Jackson D. Lymphatic vessels in vascularized human corneas: immunohistochemical investigation using LYVE-1 and podoplanin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2127–35. [PubMed]
30. Dietrich T, Bock F, Yuen D, Hos D, Bachmann BO, Zahn G, Wiegand S, Chen L, Cursiefen C. Cutting edge: lymphatic vessels, not blood vessels, primarily mediate immune rejections after transplantation. J Immunol. 2010;184:535–9. [PubMed]
31. Xu Y, Yuan L, Mak J, Pardanaud L, Caunt M, Kasman I, Larrivee B, Del Toro R, Suchting S, Medvinsky A, Silva J, Yang J, Thomas JL, Koch AW, Alitalo K, Eichmann A, Bagri A. Neuropilin-2 mediates VEGF-C-induced lymphatic sprouting together with VEGFR3. J Cell Biol. 2010;188:115–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China