PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Mol Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 30.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2994259
NIHMSID: NIHMS134487

Prevalence and functional analysis of sequence variants in the ATR checkpoint mediator Claspin (CLSPN)

Abstract

Mutational inactivation of genes controlling the DNA damage response contributes to cancer susceptibility within families and within the general population as well as to sporadic tumorigenesis. Claspin (CLSPN) encodes a recently recognized mediator protein essential for the ATR and CHK1-dependent checkpoint elicited by replicative stress or the presence of single-stranded DNA. Here we describe a study to determine whether mutational disruption of CLSPN contributes to cancer susceptibility and sporadic tumorigenesis. We resequenced CLSPN from the germline of selected cancer families with a history of breast cancer (n=25) or a multicancer phenotype (n=46) as well as from a panel of sporadic cancer cell-lines (n=52) derived from a variety of tumor types. Eight nonsynonymous variants, including a recurrent mutation, were identified from the germline of two cancer-prone individuals and five cancer cell-lines of breast, ovarian and hematopoietic origin. None of the variants was present within population controls. In contrast, mutations were rare within genes encoding the CLSPN-interacting protein ATR and its binding partner ATRIP. One variant of CLSPN, encoding the I783S missense mutation, was defective in its ability to mediate CHK1 phosphorylation following DNA damage and was unable to rescue sensitivity to replicative stress in CLSPN-depleted cells. Taken together, these observations raise the possibility that CLSPN may encode a component of the DNA damage response pathway that is targeted by mutations in human cancers, suggesting the need for larger population-based studies to investigate whether CLSPN variants contribute to cancer susceptibility.

Keywords: Claspin, ATRIP, mutation, breast, cancer

INTRODUCTION

Disruption of the DNA damage response pathway plays a critical role in the development of both sporadic and inherited forms of breast cancer and other cancers (1). For example, somatic mutations within p53, a key effector of the cellular response to DNA damage are present in more than half of all sporadic tumors, while germline p53 mutations are linked to Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS), a multi-cancer phenotype that includes breast cancer (2, 3). Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, genes that are also implicated in the cellular response to DNA damage, are responsible for a subset of familial breast cancer (4, 5), while lower-penetrance alleles in the CHEK2, PALB2, and BACH1/BRIP DNA damage response genes are associated with a modest increase in the risk of developing this disease (610).

In mammalian cells, stalling of DNA replication forks, repair of UV-induced DNA damage, and exonuclease-mediated processing of double-strand DNA breaks all lead to the appearance of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and, consequently, to the induction of cell-cycle arrest via a complex signal transduction cascade (11). An early event in the DNA damage response to ssDNA is the recruitment of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) protein, together with its binding partner ATRIP, to sites of DNA damage (12, 13). Once activated, ATR can phosphorylate the CHK1 kinase on Ser317 and Ser345 (14, 15). Activated CHK1, in turn, phosphorylates the CDC25A and CDC25C phosphatases, leading to ubiquitin-mediated proteosomal degradation of CDC25A and nuclear export and inactivation of CDC25C (16, 17). Consequently, CDKs remain in an inactive, phosphorylated state thus preventing cell cycle progression.

In Xenopus, the activation of Chk1 by ATR following replicative stress is dependent upon Claspin, a so-called mediator protein that, in a phosphoryated state, binds to Chk1 (1820). In mammalian cells the orthologous protein, CLSPN, also mediates the activation of CHK1 following replicative stress or DNA damage (21, 22). This activity is dependent upon phosphorylation of CLSPN at Thr916, a requirement for binding of CLSPN to CHK1 in vivo (23). Consistent with a role in the DNA damage response, siRNA-mediated downregulation of CLSPN in mammalian cells leads to an increase in premature chromatid condensation following HU-treatment, a reduction in the inhibition of DNA synthesis following UV exposure and a decrease in cell survival (21). Recent studies have shown that CLSPN specifically accumulates during the S phase of the cell cycle, and that its degradation in the G2 phase is essential for checkpoint recovery and associated entry into mitosis (2427). Of note, Mrc1, the yeast homolog of CLSPN, is a component of normal DNA replication forks and has checkpoint-independent functions (2832). Human CLSPN has recently been shown to facilitate the ubiquitination of PCNA following DNA damage, independently of ATR (33).

Here we describe the resequencing of CLSPN, a relatively poorly characterized component of the DNA damage response pathway, from the germline of familial cancer cases and within a panel of sporadic cancer cell-lines. We report prevalent variants within CLSPN as well a single allelic variant within ATRIP. Functional analysis revealed that at least one variant of CLSPN is associated with hypersensitivity to replication-induced DNA damage both in vitro and in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

High-risk cancer cohorts

Our cohort was comprised of EBV-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell-lines established from probands with early-onset breast cancer and a family history of disease (n=25) (34), Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) (n=5), or variant-LFS (n=41). Breast cancer families were not linked to germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Likewise, multicancer families were not linked to germline mutations within p53. All clinical material was collected under appropriate Institutional Review Board-approved protocols. EBV-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell-lines were maintained in Iscoves modified Dulbecco’s medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), L-glutamine (2mM), and penicillin (10U)-streptomycin (10µg) at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Sporadic cancer cell-lines

Sporadic cancer cell-lines were obtained from ATCC and were comprised of the following: breast (MCF7ADR, MDA-MB-435, T47D, BT483, MDA-MB-436, MDA-MB-53, MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-415, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-175, MDA-MB-157, HS157, HS467T, HS496T, HS578T, UACC893, BT549), ovarian (ES-2, IGROV-1, MDAH2774, OV1063, OVCAR3, OVCAR4, OVCAR5, OVCAR8, SKOV3, SW626), lung (NCIH460, NCI522, HOP92), CNS (SF295, SNB19, U251), hematopoetic ((CCRF-CEM (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), K562 (chronic myelogenous leukemia), MOLT4 (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), RPMI-8226 (multiple myeloma), SR (large-cell lymphoma)), colon (COLO205, HCT116, HCT15), renal (786-0, ACHN, CAKI-1, SN12C, U031), melanoma (LOXMVII, M14, SKMEL2, UACC62), and osteosarcoma (U20S, SAOS2). Cell-lines were not authenticated after receipt. Cell-lines were grown in either DMEM or RPMI-1640 (hematopoetic cell-lines) supplemented with 10% FBS, L-glutamine (2mM), and penicillin (10U)-streptomycin (10µg) at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Control populations

EBV-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell-lines were established from 200 anonymous blood donors with no previous diagnosis of cancer, the majority of whom were Caucasian, through the Massachusetts General Hospital blood bank. A second, multiethnic, control series consisted of DNAs extracted from 360 healthy individuals with approximately equal representation of African-American, Caucasian, Hawaiian, Japanese, and Latino ethnic subgroups (35).

Mutational Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from cell-lines using a standard phenol-chloform procedure followed by ethanol precipitation and resuspension in TE buffer. All coding exons of CLSPN and ATRIP were amplified from genomic DNA using intronic primers. Primers and PCR conditions are available upon request. PCR amplicons were purified by exonuclease I (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH) and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH) treatment according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Purified amplicons were diluted and sequenced using the BigDye terminator kit version 1.1 in conjunction with an ABI3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Nucleotide sequences were analyzed for the presence of mutations by visual inspection and using Sequence Navigator and Factura softwares (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) to mark and display heterozygous or homozygous positions. All non-synonymous sequence variants were confirmed from at least two independent genomic DNA amplifications. Denaturing HPLC (dHPLC) using the Wavemaker system (Transgenomic, Ohmaha, NE) was used to screen for variants within the coding sequence of ATR. Wavemaker software (Transgenomic, Omaha, NE) and the Stanford prediction program (http://insertion.stanford.edu/melt.html) were used to determine the optimal annealing temperatures for mutational analysis by dHPLC. Amplicons exhibiting anomalies by heteroduplex analysis were sequenced to determine the underlying nucleotide change.

Genotyping of population controls

Non-synonymous sequence variants were genotyped within population controls by direct nucleotide sequencing (up to 200 Caucasian controls) as described above, or using a Sequenom MassArray system (up to 360 multiethnic controls). Primers and probes were designed for each variant using the SpectroDesign software and are available on request. Multiplex PCR was performed in 5-µl volumes that contained 0.1 U of Taq polymerase (Amplitaq Gold, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 5 ng genomic DNA, 2.5 pmol of each primer, and 2.5 mol of dNTP. Thermocycling was at 95°C for 15 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 56°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. Unincorporated dNTPs were deactivated using 0.3 U of shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Roche, Germany), followed by primer extension using 5.4 pmol of each primer extension probe, 50 µM of the appropriate dNTP/ddNTP combination, and 0.5 units ofThermosequenase (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). Reactions were cycled at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 5 s, 50°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 5 s. After the addition of a cation-exchange resin to remove residual salt from the reactions, ~7 nl of the purified primer-extension reaction was loaded onto a matrix pad (3-hydroxypicolinic acid) of a SpectroCHIP (Sequenom, San Diego, CA). SpectroCHIPs were analyzed using a Bruker Biflex III MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (SpectroREADER, Sequenom, San Diego, CA) and the spectra processed using SpectroTYPER (Sequenom, San Diego, CA). Genotyping percentage exceeded 98% for each assay. Error rates as previously assessed by duplicate samples on this platform have been estimated at 0.3%.

Generation of CLSPN Expression Constructs

A C-terminal myc-tagged construct expressing full-length, wildtype CLSPN was generated by PCR and cloned into the pCDNA3.1/V5-His TOPO TA expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to generate mutant constructs expressing the naturally occurring Ile236Val, Ala1146Ser, Pro956Leu, Gly364Asp, Ile783Ser, or Arg1184Trp CLSPN variants. The integrity of all constructs was verified by nucleotide sequencing. The expression of each construct was confirmed by Western blot analysis using an anti-MYC antibody after transfection into U2OS cells. Constructs encoding the wildtype CLSPN and each of the CLSPN variants were subcloned into the pAd shuttle vector. Briefly, constructs in the pCDNA3.1/V5-His Topo vector were digested with BamHI and XhoI and cloned into the BglII/XhoI site of the pShuttle-CMV vector. Recombinant adenoviral plasmids were generated by homologous recombination in E. coli and adenovirus titers measured using the Adeno-X™ titer kit (BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) and DNA Transfections

Duplexes targeting CLSPN-3’UTR, or a control transcript, were obtained from Dharmacon, Inc (Lafayette, CO). The coding strand of the CLSPN-siRNA was AUUGCAGACAGAAAUUCCAdTdT and the control-siRNA was UCCAGUGAAUCCUUGAGGUdTdT (21). SiRNA duplexes were transfected into U2OS cells using Oligofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, cells were grown to 30–40% confluency and transfected with siRNAs at 100 nM for 48h, after which time the culture medium was replaced and cells were allowed to recover at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. The siRNA transfection was then repeated. In cotransfection experiments, U2OS cells were initially transfected with siRNA alone using Oligofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After 24 h, cells were transfected with CLSPN-expressing constructs using Lipofectamine-2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After a 24h recovery period, cells were mock-treated or UV-treated (10J/m2).

Immunoblotting

U2OS cells transfected with control or CLSPN-3'UTR siRNAs were treated with IR (10Gy), UV (10J/m2) or HU (2mM), or left untreated, 48h after the second siRNA transfection. Cells were harvested for Western blotting after 1h by lysis in NETN buffer consisting of 150mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA, 20mM Tris (pH 8), 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1x protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Lysates were either untreated, or treated with λ phosphatase (400U) for 30 min at 30°C in the buffer provided (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), and resolved on a 7.5% SDS/PAGE gel. For immunoblot analysis, proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA), probed with the appropriate antibody, and visualized with the Western Lightning Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Antibodies used were the anti-CLSPN (ab3720) antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), the anti-CHK1 (G-4) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), the anti-phospho CHK1 (Ser345) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), anti-Myc (9B11) antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), and the β-tubulin antibody (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY).

Colony Formation Assay

U2OS cells co-transfected with control or CLSPN-3'UTR siRNA were plated at low density and treated with 2mM HU for 24 hr, at which time cells were washed and the culture medium replaced. Colonies were stained with Coomassie Blue and counted after two weeks.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Germline and somatic sequence variants in CLSPN

We resequenced all coding exons of CLSPN from EBV-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell-lines established from 71 index cases with a family history of cancer. Germline variants of CLSPN were present among lymphoblastoid cell-lines from 1 of 25 (4%) probands from breast cancer families, and 1 of 46 (2%) probands from multicancer families (Table 1). We therefore extended our analysis to search for CLSPN mutations in a panel of sporadic cancer cell-lines representing diverse tumor types, including breast cancer. Non-synonymous sequence variants were uncovered in 5 of 52 (10%) sporadic cancer cell-lines representing eight distinct tumor types (Fig. 1). These were confined to cell-lines derived from tumors of the breast (2 of 17 lines), ovary (1 of 10 lines) and hematopoetic system (2 of 5 lines) (Table 1). All variants were missense mutations, none of which was present among a series of at least 140 control individuals (280 alleles), nor were they reported SNPs (Table 1). Among the six CLSPN variants found within sporadic cancer cell-lines, five occurred in the heterozygous state. An exception was the breast cancer cell-line MDA-MB-175, which was homozygous for a variant encoding the P956L substitution. A second cell-line, ES2, derived from an ovarian tumor, contained two independent missense mutations leading to the R1184W and I783S substitutions. Sequencing of cloned RT-PCR products generated from ES2 revealed that the substitutions were biallelic, occurring in trans. The R1184W variant was also present within a leukemia cell-line, MOLT4, but was absent amongst 184 healthy individuals, suggesting that this may represent a recurrent tumor-associated mutation. The CLSPN I236V, I783S, A1146S and R1184W variants each affected amino acid residues that are conserved between human and Xenopus, suggesting that they may be important for proper functional activity.

Figure 1
Somatic and germline variants of CLSPN
Table 1
CLSPN mutations among cancer families and sporadic cancer cell-lines

Sequence variant within ATRIP

Given our observation of CLSPN variants within a subset of sporadic cancer cell-lines, we extended our screen to search for somatic mutations within genes encoding proteins that have a direct functional interaction with CLSPN namely ATR and ATRIP. We previously reported the absence of mutations within CHK1, which encodes a CLSPN-interacting protein, within this same panel of cell-lines (6). Here, a single non-synonymous sequence variant was identified within ATRIP from the panel of 52 tumor-derived cell-lines. This consisted of a heterozygous missense mutation (c.2297C>T), predicted to encode an amino acid substitution ATRIP-T766M within the ovarian cancer cell-line OVCAR3. This affects a residue that is immediately proximal to the conserved PIKK interaction motif within ATRIP, although it does not itself display cross-species sequence conservation (36). The ATRIP variant was not detected within the germline of 241 healthy control individuals (482 alleles) indicating that it is not a common polymorphism within the general population.

Functional properties of CLSPN mutants

The relatively high frequency of sequence variants detected within CLSPN, compared with the frequency of ATRIP mutations within the same set of cell-lines, prompted us to examine the effect of the CLSPN variants on function. To evaluate the functional consequences of each CLSPN variant, we examined their ability to undergo phosphorylation in response to DNA damage, as well as their effect on DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of CHK1. We first confirmed that phosphorylation of CHK1 at Serine 345 is reproducibly observed in U2OS cells (Fig. 2A), as well as in the breast cancer cell-lines MDA-MB-436, MDA-MB-453 and MDA-MB-468 (Fig.S1) in response to either UV or hydroxyurea (HU) exposure. Si-RNA-mediated knockdown of endogenous CLSPN in U2OS cells specifically suppressed this effect (Fig. 2A). The siRNA constructs were designed to target the 3’ UTR of the native CLSPN transcript, making it possible to simultaneously express ectopic CLSPN constructs lacking the 3’UTR. Ectopic 3’UTR-truncated CLSPN was subject to physiological regulation, as demonstrated by its phosphorylation following HU exposure (Fig. 2B). We then engineered U2OS cells by knocking down endogenous CLSPN, while ectopically expressing variants identified in our mutation screen. We established two independent reconstitution assays in U2OS cells to investigate the possible functional defects of CLSPN mutants. In the first, we tested CHK1 phosphorylation post-transfection of siControl and siCLSPN oligos following UV treatment. We chose to examine cells following UV treatment because this form of DNA damage gave the most robust induction of CHK1 phosphorylation in siControl transfectants (Fig. 2A). In this reconstitution assay, wildtype CLSPN displayed a robust restoration of CHK1 phosphorylation following UV treatment. Of six variants tested, one, CLSPN-I783S, reproducibly displayed a reduced complementation of endogenous CLSPN knockdown (Fig. 2C), as measured by CHK1 phosphorylation, across three independent experiments. CLSPN has previously been implicated in a pathway that prevents premature chromatin condensation in response to HU induced DNA damage (21). Therefore, we established a a second reconstitution assay in which we evaluated survival of U2OS cells post-transfection of siControl and siCLSPN oligos and following HU treatment. CLSPN-I783S reproducibly displayed a reduced complementation of endogenous CLSPN knockdown, as determined by cell viability, following treatment with HU (Fig. 2D). All other mutant constructs tested (I236V, A1146S, P956L, G364D, and R1184W) showed a level of complementation similar to the wild-type construct and therefore are currently of unknown functional significance (data not shown). Although we have not identified a cell-line with definitive homozygous inactivation of CLSPN, the ES2 ovarian cancer cell-line harbors two heterozygous mutations in CLSPN, occurring in trans, namely the I783S and R1184W mutations. This cell-line showed very low levels of CHK1 phosphorylation following UV or HU treatment (Fig. S2). Taken together, these observations suggest that CLSPN-I783S encodes an attenuated allele, potentially linked to tumorigenic properties. However, in the absence of assays that directly measure CLSPN activity, it remains possible that additional mutants identified in this study may encode proteins with attenuated activity beyond the level of detection by our assays. Similar effects have been noted for the CHEK2-I157T variant, which encodes an attenuated protein that is impaired in only certain aspects of the CHEK2-mediated DNA damage response (3739). Alternatively, some CLSPN mutations uncovered within our screen may be passenger mutations rather than driver mutations in human tumorigenesis. As has been noted in other studies, robust functional assays are an absolute requirement to distinguishing between passenger and driver mutations (40).

Figure 2
The CLSPN-I783S variant encodes a functionally defective protein

In addition to the CLSPN variants observed in sporadic cancer cell-lines, we also detected germline variants of this gene within EBV-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell-lines established from probands from two cancer families. However, extended genetic analysis of matched tumor DNA for loss-of-heterozygosity, or of germline DNA from an affected relative for co-segregation, provided no evidence for an association of the variant alleles with disease susceptibility in these particular families (data not shown). This is consistent with recent analyses of breast cancer families which also found no evidence for linkage of CLSPN to breast cancer predisposition (41, 42). Candidate gene analysis is complementary to genome wide association (GWA) studies, especially for rare variants in genes that are known to play a role in DNA damage pathways. As illustrated by a number of genes studied to date (7, 8, 10), multiple different variants, each of which is relatively rare in the population, may contribute toward cancer risk, without the ancestral founder effects that are best identified by GWA studies. As such, combining mutational analysis with detailed functional assays is particularly valuable in dissecting pathways that, in aggregate, contribute toward breast cancer susceptibility in the general population.

In conclusion, our findings have highlighted a potential role for mutational disruption of CLSPN in human tumorigenesis. Given that CLSPN is a multifunctional protein and that it modulates, but does not directly execute the phosphorylation of ATR substrates, it is perhaps not surprising that some functional defects of the CLSPN mutants have not been revealed by the specific in vitro functional assays that we used. As our understanding of the precise biochemical activity of CLSPN improves, additional assays may become available to shed further light on the functional impact of the germline and somatic mutations described here. In the meantime, resequencing of this gene among primary tumors of the breast, ovary and hematopoetic system may be required to more precisely determine the extent and role of CLSPN disruption in these malignancies.

Supplementary Material

1

Fig. S1. CHK1 phosphorylation status of breast cancer cell-lines in response to DNA damage. MDA-MB-436, -453, and -468 cells were untreated or treated with HU (2mM) and UV (10J/m2). Cells were harvested 1h post-treatment followed by immunoblotting to determine the levels of phospho-CHK1(Ser345), CLSPN, CHK1. β-tubulin served as a loading control.

2

Fig. S2. CHK1 phosphorylation is defective in ES2 cells in response to DNA damage. U2OS and ES2 cells were untreated or treated with UV (10J/m2) or HU (2mM). Cells were harvested 1h post-treatment followed by immunoblotting to measure levels of phospho-CHK1(Ser345) and CLSPN. β-tubulin served as loading control.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the patients and their family members who participated in this study. We thank Melissa Jorczak for technical assistance. Supported in part by NIH grants CA87691 (to D.A.H.), the National Cancer Institute Specialized Programs of Research Excellence on breast cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital (to D.A.H.), the Avon Products Foundation (to D.W.B.), the AACR-National Foundation for Cancer Research Professorship in Basic Cancer Research (to D.A.H.), the Doris Duke Foundation (D.A.H.), and by the Intramural Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute/NIH (D.W.B.). MLF was supported by a fellowship from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

REFERENCES

1. Bartek J, Lukas J. Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:421–429. [PubMed]
2. Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC. p53 mutations in human cancers. Science. 1991;253:49–53. [PubMed]
3. Malkin D, Li FP, Strong LC, et al. Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science. 1990;250:1233–1238. [PubMed]
4. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994;266:66–71. [PubMed]
5. Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature. 1995;378:789–792. [PubMed]
6. Bell DW, Varley JM, Szydlo TE, et al. Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Science. 1999;286:2528–2531. [PubMed]
7. Meijers-Heijboer H, van den Ouweland A, Klijn J, et al. CHEK2-Breast Cancer Consortium. Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Nat Genet. 2002;31:55–59. [PubMed]
8. Rahman N, Seal S, Thompson D, et al. PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet. 2007;39:165–167. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Erkko H, Xia B, Nikkilä J, et al. A recurrent mutation in PALB2 in Finnish cancer families. Nature. 2007;446:316–319. [PubMed]
10. Seal S, Thompson D, Renwick A, et al. Truncating mutations in the Fanconi anemia J gene BRIP1 are low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet. 2007:1239–1241. [PubMed]
11. Bartek J, Lukas J. Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:421–429. [PubMed]
12. Cortez D, Guntuku S, Qin J, Elledge SJ. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science. 2001;294:1713–1716. [PubMed]
13. Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science. 2003;300:1542–1548. [PubMed]
14. Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, et al. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1448–1459. [PubMed]
15. Zhao H, Piwnica-Worms H. ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:4129–4139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Mailand N, Falck J, Lukas C, et al. Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage. Science. 2000;288:1425–1429. [PubMed]
17. Peng CY, Graves PR, Thoma RS, Wu Z, Shaw AS, Piwnica-Worms H. Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216. Science. 1997;277:1501–1505. [PubMed]
18. Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell. 2000;6:839–849. [PubMed]
19. Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. Repeated phosphopeptide motifs in Claspin mediate the regulated binding of Chk1. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:161–165. [PubMed]
20. Jeong SY, Kumagai A, Lee J, Dunphy WG. Phosphorylated claspin interacts with a phosphate-binding site in the kinase domain of Chk1 during ATR-mediated activation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:46782–46788. [PubMed]
21. Chini CC, Chen J. Human claspin is required for replication checkpoint control. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:30057–30062. [PubMed]
22. Lin SY, Li K, Stewart GS, Elledge SJ. Human Claspin works with BRCA1 to both positively and negatively regulate cell proliferation. PNAS. 2004;101:6484–6489. [PubMed]
23. Chini CC, Chen J. Repeated phosphopeptide motifs in human Claspin are phosphorylated by Chk1 and mediate Claspin function. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:33276–33282. [PubMed]
24. Bennett LN, Clarke PR. Regulation of Claspin degradation by the ubiquitin-proteosome pathway during the cell cycle and in response to ATR-dependent checkpoint activation. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:4176–4181. [PubMed]
25. Mamely I, van Vugt MA, Smits VA, et al. Polo-like kinase-1 controls proteasome-dependent degradation of Claspin during checkpoint recovery. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1950–1955. [PubMed]
26. Peschiaroli A, Dorrello NV, Guardavaccaro D, et al. SCFbetaTrCP-mediated degradation of Claspin regulates recovery from the DNA replication checkpoint response. Mol Cell. 2006;23:319–329. [PubMed]
27. Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Bartek J, Lukas J. Destruction of Claspin by SCFbetaTrCP restrains Chk1 activation and facilitates recovery from genotoxic stress. Mol Cell. 2006;23:307–318. [PubMed]
28. Tanaka K, Russell P. Mrc1 channels the DNA replication arrest signal to checkpoint kinase Cds1. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:966–972. [PubMed]
29. Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, et al. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:958–965. [PubMed]
30. Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature. 2003;424:1078–1083. [PubMed]
31. Xu H, Boone C, Klein HL. Mrc1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion to aid in recombination repair of spontaneous damage. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:7082–7090. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Tourrière H, Versini G, Cordón-Preciado V, Alabert C, Pasero P. Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell. 2005;19:699–706. [PubMed]
33. Yang XH, Shiotani B, Classon M, Zou L. Chk1 and Claspin potentiate PCNA ubiquitination. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1147–1152. [PubMed]
34. FitzGerald MG, MacDonald DJ, Krainer M, et al. Germ-line BRCA1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish women with early-onset breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 1996;334:143–149. [PubMed]
35. Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:346–357. [PubMed]
36. Falck J, Coates J, Jackson SP. Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature. 2005;434:605–611. [PubMed]
37. Wu X, Webster SR, Chen J. Characterization of tumor-associated Chk2 mutations. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:2971–2974. [PubMed]
38. Falck J, Mailand N, Syljuåsen RG, Bartek J, Lukas J. The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature. 2001;410:842–847. [PubMed]
39. Li J, Williams BL, Haire LF, et al. Structural and functional versatility of the FHA domain in DNA-damage signaling by the tumor suppressor kinase Chk2. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1045–1054. [PubMed]
40. Fröhling S, Scholl C, Levine RL, et al. Identification of driver and passenger mutations of FLT3 by high-throughput DNA sequence analysis and functional assessment of candidate alleles. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:501–513. [PubMed]
41. Erkko H, Pylkäs K, Karppinen SM, Winqvist R. Germline alterations in the CLSPN gene in breast cancer families. Cancer Lett. 2008;261:93–97. [PubMed]
42. Wang X, Szabo C, Qian C, et al. Mutational analysis of thirty-two double-strand DNA break repair genes in breast and pancreatic cancers. Cancer Res. 2008;68:971–975. [PubMed]