PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Transplantation. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 29.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2993323
NIHMSID: NIHMS250632

VENOUS-RIGHT ATRIAL BYPASS FOR SUPERIOR VENA CAVA THROMBOSIS DURING ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

The introduction of veno-venous bypass during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT*) in 1984 avoided venous stagnation and hemodynamic instability during the anhepatic phase (1). In patients with superior vena cava (SVC) thrombosis or stenosis, the use of veno-venous bypass with the standard technique should be avoided because it can precipitate the onset of severe SVC syndrome (2). We describe here the use of a veno-right atrial bypass in a patient with SVC thrombosis who underwent simultaneous OLT and kidney transplantation.

A 51-year-old man with the diagnosis of cryptogenic cirrhosis and chronic renal failure underwent simultaneous OLT and renal transplantation at our institution on February 5, 1995. A LeVeen shunt had been implanted elsewhere in October 1994 for refractory ascites and was subsequently removed 4 weeks later due to infection and occlusion. At the time of transplantation, insertion of an oxymetric pulmonary artery catheter was attempted through both the right and left internal jugular veins, but it could not be advanced on either side. An intraoperative venogram showed thrombosis of the SVC with several small collaterals draining caudally (Fig. 1). An oximetric pulmonary artery catheter was subsequently inserted through the right femoral vein and positioned in the pulmonary artery. In order to infuse volume during the transplant, a Biomedicus venous cannula with a side port was inserted through the left femoral vein. This cannula also served as the outflow catheter for the inferior vena cava (IVC) during the subsequent bypass. After a median sternotomy, a single straight Bard cannula (no. 32), modified in order to have a side port for volume infusion, was placed in the right atrium and secured with two 2-O Ethibond pledgeted purse-string sutures (Fig. 2). After transaction of the bile duct and the hepatic artery, the portal vein was cannulated with a Gott shunt cannula (no. 9) and connected with the other cannulas to a centrifugal force pump.

FIGURE 1
Intraoperative SVC venogram shows obstruction of the SVC at the junction with the left subclavian vein, right subclavian vein thrombosis with collaterals.
FIGURE 2
As shown in this scheme of the portal-atrial bypass, a femoral vein cannula and a right atrial cannula were used as infusion ports for volume replacement.

During the bypass, the flow was maintained at 3 L/min. The central venous pressure during bypass was 12 mmHg, and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 16 mmHg.

The hepatectomy was performed using the piggyback technique (3) to maintain blood flow through the Ive and preserve the pulmonary catheter. During the veno-atrial bypass, the patient was hemodynamically stable with a total blood loss of 7 U of packed red blood cells. After reperfusion of the liver allograft, the right atrial cannula was removed and the purse-string suture was ligated to close the right atrial defect. Two no. 28 thoracostomy tubes were left in the mediatinum, and the sternum was closed with interrupted wire. The left kidney from the same donor was transplanted into the left iliac fossa.

The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. He received an antiarrhytmic agent for prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation, and the immunosuppression was iniated using tacrolimus and steroids.

The LeVeen modification for the peritoneovenous shunt has been used extensively for the treatment of refractory ascites since its introduction in 1974 (4). The incidence of SVC thrombosis or stenosis after LeVeen shunt has been reported with a variable incidence between 18.6% and 43% (57). Performing a liver transplantation in the presence of an SVC obstruction carries potential hemodynamic consequences, especially during the anhepatic phase. Volume infusion and hemodynamic monitoring were assured in this patient with an IVC access; interruption of the IVC was avoided by using the piggyback technique, and venous return was optimized with a portal-atrial bypass by right atrial cannulation. Given the concerns that had arisen because of this case, we currently assess SVC patency with Doppler ultrasound and SVC cavogram as needed in all candidates with prior LeVeen shunt in order to detect the presence of SVC thrombosis or stenosis before liver transplantation. It would also be possible to use transesophageal echocardiography instead of a pulmonary artery catheter for hemodynamic monitoring if occlusion of the IVC is necessary (e.g., in the case of cancer patients).

Footnotes

*Abbreviations: IVC, inferior vena cava; OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation; SVC, superior vena cava.

REFERENCES

1. Shaw BW, Martin DJ, Marquez JM, et al. Venous by-pass in clinical liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 1984;20:524. [PubMed]
2. Kang Y, Videira R, DeWolf AM, et al. The superior vena caval syndrome during orthotopic liver transplantation: a complication of LeVeen shunt and veno-venous by- pass. Transplant Proc. 1989;23(3):1998. [PubMed]
3. Tzakis A, Todo S, Starzl TE. Orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava. Ann Surg. 1989;210:649. [PubMed]
4. LeVeen HH, Christoudias G, Moon JP, et al. Peritoneovenous shunting for ascites. Ann Surg. 1974;180:580. [PubMed]
5. Foley WJ, Elliott JP, Smith RF, et al. Central venous thrombosis and embolism associated with peritoneovenous shunt. Arch Surg. 1984;119:713. [PubMed]
6. Smadja C, Tridard D, Franco D. Recurrent ascites due to central venous thrombosis after peritoneojugular (LeVeen) shunt. Surgery. 1986;100:535. [PubMed]
7. Moskovitz M. The peritoneovenous shunt: expectations and reality. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:917. [PubMed]