PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2010 December 3; 285(49): 38104–38114.
Published online 2010 September 17. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M110.169102
PMCID: PMC2992244

Mutational Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Erf2 Reveals a Two-step Reaction Mechanism for Protein Palmitoylation by DHHC Enzymes*

Abstract

DHHC protein acyltransferases (PATs) catalyze the palmitoylation of eukaryotic proteins through an enzymatic mechanism that remains largely unexplored. In this study we have combined genetic and biochemical approaches to examine the molecular mechanism of palmitate transfer of the yeast Ras PAT, which is composed of Erf2 and Erf4. The palmitoylation reaction consists of two steps; they are autopalmitoylation of the enzyme to create a palmitoyl-Erf2 intermediate followed by the transfer of the palmitoyl moiety to the Ras substrate. Palmitoyl-CoA serves as the palmitate donor. To elucidate the kinetic properties of the Erf2·Erf4 PAT, we have developed a coupled enzyme assay that monitors the turnover of the palmitoyl-enzyme species indirectly by measuring the rate of CoASH release. Mutational analysis indicates that the DHHC motif constitutes the catalytic core of the enzyme required for autopalmitoylation and palmitoyl transfer to the Ras2 substrate. In the absence of Ras2, the palmitoyl-Erf2·Erf4 complex undergoes a cycle of hydrolysis and re-palmitoylation, implying that in the presence of palmitoyl-CoA, the complex is autopalmitoylated and competent to transfer palmitate to a protein substrate.

Keywords: Enzyme Mechanisms, Lipid, Protein Palmitoylation, Ras, Yeast

Introduction

Post-translational modifications extend the functional and regulatory repertoire of proteins. In the case of protein lipidation, the addition of prenyl, palmitoyl, myristoyl, and cholesterol moieties affects subcellular localization and protein trafficking, solubility, and degradation (1, 2). Protein S-palmitoylation is the reversible thiol esterification of cysteine residues that is catalyzed by a family of DHHC motif-containing proteins called protein acyltransferases (PATs)2 or simply palmitoyl transferases (3,5). Protein palmitoylation was first described over 30 years ago and has been implicated in key cellular processes including cell growth and proliferation, protein trafficking, protein turnover, and vesicle fusion (6, 7). The reversible nature of protein palmitoylation makes it well suited to play a regulatory role, including in heterotrimeric and small GTP-binding proteins, receptors, and ion channels (8, 9). PAT enzymes share a number of common features including four transmembrane domains and a canonical Asp-His-His-Cys sequence (DHHC motif) that has been hypothesized to be the catalytic center of the enzyme (5, 7, 10). Despite the central importance of protein palmitoylation in many physiological processes, the molecular mechanism of the palmitoylation reaction remains poorly understood.

There are 7 DHHC PATs in yeast and 23 in mammals (7). Based on in silico topology (TMPRED) computer simulations, the peptide loop containing the signature DHHC residues is predicted to immediately precede a transmembrane domain placing the DHHC motif in juxtaposition to the membrane (11). In addition to the DHHC motif and the transmembrane domains, most but not all PATs contain a cysteine-rich domain (CRD) (7). The exceptions include Akr1, Akr2, Pfa5 (yeast), and DHHC22 (mammals), which lack one or more of the conserved cysteines and histidines that are found in most PATs. The significance of this difference is not clear but may lie in the hypothesis that the canonical CRD forms a zinc finger domain (12, 13). However, based on the high degree of conservation in the DHHC region, the sensitivity of the enzyme to neutral hydroxylamine, and the loss of activity when the cysteine residue is mutated, it has been hypothesized that the DHHC tetrapeptide is directly involved in catalysis (5, 10). All DHHC enzymes tested to date appear to transfer palmitate via a palmitoyl enzyme intermediate (7, 14). Using palmitoyl-CoA as the substrate, the PAT initiates the reaction forming palmitoylated enzyme, a process referred to as autopalmitoylation.

To investigate the enzymatic properties of these proteins, we have chosen the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras PAT, Erf2·Erf4. Erf2·Erf4 is a heterodimeric PAT that palmitoylates yeast Ras2 on Cys-318, adjacent to the farnesylated cysteine, Cys-319. In the absence of protein substrate, PATs undergo autopalmitoylation when incubated with palmitoyl-CoA (7, 14). In this study we describe assays capable of measuring the rates of different steps in the palmitoyl transferase reaction. Mutants of the CRD appear to be deficient in the autopalmitoylation reaction, and this explains their inability to palmitoylate Ras2 in vivo. We observe that the palmitoyl-PAT species can undergo hydrolysis, either liberating free palmitate or when present, transferring the palmitoyl moiety to the substrate. Our data suggest that in the absence of Ras2, Erf2·Erf4 loses the palmitate to water; however, in the presence of its substrate, the enzyme favors the substrate and transfers palmitate to Ras2.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Strains, Media, and Yeast Techniques

Yeast growth media were prepared as described previously (15). Cells were grown in synthetic complete medium or YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% glucose) medium (15). Induction of GAL1, 10 promoters were achieved by adding 4% galactose to synthetic complete medium. Yeast transformations were performed using the lithium acetate procedure (16). Yeast strain RDY1830 (MATα ade2-1 leu2-3 ura3-52 trp1-1 his3-11,15 can1-100 GAL+ psi+ erf2Δ::NATr) was constructed from RDY1785 (MATα ade2-1 leu2-3 ura3-52 trp1-1 his3-11,15 can1-100 GAL+ psi+) by replacing ERF2 with a PCR-generated NATr gene from p4339 (Gift from Charlie Boone) using deoxyoligonucleotides erf2:NAT-F and erf2:NAT-R (Table 1), which contain sequences 5′ and 3′ of the ERF2 ORF, respectively. The same approach was used to construct RDY1831 (MATa ade2-1 leu2-3 ura3-52 trp1-1 his3-11,15 can1-100 GAL+ psi+ erf2Δ::NATr) and from RDY1786 (MATa ade2-1 leu2-3 ura3-52 trp1-1 his3-11,15 can1-100 GAL+ psi+). Diploid strain RDY1827 was constructed by mating RDY1830 with RDY1831.

TABLE 1
ERF2 mutant oligodeoxyribonucleic acids used in these studies

Plasmid Construction

The construction of pESC-His6-Erf2-FLAG-Erf4 has been described previously (17). Deoxyoligonucleotides used to construct ERF2 alleles are listed in Table 1. His6-ERF2 alleles were constructed using the QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Isolates produced from the mutagenesis protocol were sequenced to confirm the ERF2 allele changes (Table 2). Low-copy versions of these alleles lacking the His6 tag were constructed into B642 (Table 2). Briefly, the mutants were amplified using PCR with ERF2 alleles described above as templates and deoxyoligonucleotides Erf2-F and Erf2-R as primers. The Erf2-F and Erf2-R deoxyoligonucleotides have sequences that overlap with the 5′ and 3′ ends of the ERF2 ORF, respectively. The ERF2 alleles were introduced into the B642 through homologous recombination by first deleting part of the ERF2 ORF with NcoI and NruI and then transforming the PCR product and the “gapped” plasmid simultaneously into RJY-1330 and selecting for Trp+ colonies. Plasmids were rescued (18) and the DNA was sequenced to confirm the presence of the mutations (GeneWiz, South Plainfield, NJ).

TABLE 2
Plasmids used

pEG(KT)mCherry:Ras2CT35 and pEG(KT)mCherry:Ras2CT35S318 were constructed using homologous recombination by cutting B389 (19) and B341 (19), respectively, with SmaI and inserting the gene for mCherry (from pBS34, Yeast Resource Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA), which had been amplified by PCR using oligonucleotides GSTmCherry and mCherryRas2 (Table 1). Transformants were selected by growth on medium lacking uracil and histidine (pMA210) (20). Plasmids were rescued from the transformants (18), and the presence of the mCherry gene was determined by DNA sequencing (GeneWiz, South Plainfield, NJ).

Complementation Assay

The in vivo function of the mutants along with the wild type protein was investigated using our previously described complementation assay (3). Briefly, in this assay, cells contain a defective allele of RAS2 that is balanced by an episomal copy of RAS2 linked to URA3. Under these conditions, the loss of ERF2 gene is permissible as long as the cell maintains the RAS2/URA3-based episome. This is detected by their ability or inability of the strain to grow on medium supplemented with 5′-fluoroorotic acid (FOA) (21). Cells carrying ERF2 alleles were transformed into RJY1330 and plated on synthetic medium containing glucose and lacking tryptophan. Colonies were inoculated into liquid synthetic medium containing glucose or raffinose (both lacking tryptophan) and grown to an A600 of between 0.8 and 1.2. The cell density was determined by monitoring absorbance using a spectrophotometer at 600 nm. 1:10 serial dilutions were made starting with 10,000 cells. The cells were spotted onto synthetic medium containing or lacking 5′-FOA as presented in the figures.

Protein Purification

Strain RJY1827 was transformed with pESC(His6)ERF2-(FLAG)ERF4 and pMA210 and grown in SC(−Leu−His) medium containing 2% (v/v) ethanol, 2% (v/v) glycerol at 30 °C. The cultures were grown to 2 × 107 cells/ml and then induced by adding galactose to a final concentration of 4%. Cells were induced for 17h (30 °C) and then harvested by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 15 min, the pellet was resuspended in breaking buffer (50 mm Tris pH 8, 500 ml NaCl, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm DTT, 1× Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), 8 μl/ml PMSF), and the cells were lysed using glass beads (400–600 mesh, Sigma) for 40 min with 1.5-min pulses. The resulting extract was spun at 3000 × g for 15 min to remove cellular debris and unbroken cells followed by a crude membrane fraction (P100) by centrifugation (100,000 × g) for 1.5 h at 4 °C with a Beckman® 50.2 Ti rotor. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.4, with the aid of a Dounce homogenizer. The resulting extract was adjusted to a final concentration of 0.8% dodecylmaltoside, 500 mm NaCl, and 1 mm β-mercaptoethanol. To solubilize the membranes, the extract was incubated at 4 °C (1.5 h). To aid in purification, urea and imidazole were added to a final concentration of 2.4 m and 1 mm, respectively. Insoluble material was then removed by centrifugation (10,000 × g) for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was incubated with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin at 4 °C for 1 h. The resin was washed once with Solution W (50 mm Tris·HCl, pH 8.5, 0.08% dodecylmaltoside, 5 mm β-mercaptoethanol) containing 300 mm NaCl and then twice with Solution W containing 150 mm NaCl. The protein was eluted with 50 mm Tris HCl, pH 8.5, 150 mm NaCl, 0.08% dodecylmaltoside, 5% glycerol, and 250 mm imidazole. Eluates were desalted, and the buffer was changed to SPB (50 mm sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol) using a column of G-25 resin. Fractions containing His6-Erf2/FLAG-Erf4 were pooled to obtain ~0.5 mg of purified Ras PAT per liter of culture.

The GST-mCherry-Ras2 substrate used in Erf2·Erf4 palmitoylation assays was purified as described earlier (17). Previously, using truncated constructs, we showed that the C-terminal 35 amino acids of Ras2 are sufficient for substrate recognition and catalysis (19). Therefore, we expressed and purified GST-mCherry-Ras2 CT35 as the substrate for in vitro assays with Erf2·Erf4.

Coupled PAT Assay

The production of NADH was monitored as a single cuvette platform and a 96-well platform. In the single cuvette platform the production of NADH was monitored using a PTI Double-Double Quantum Master 3 Fluorimeter (340-nm excitation/465-nm emission). The 200-μl reaction contained 2 mm α-ketoglutarate, 0.25 mm NAD+, 0.2 mm thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), 3 μg of Erf2·Erf4, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm DTT, 30 milliunits of α-KDH, and 50 mm sodium phosphate, pH 6.8. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 25 μm palmitoyl-CoA and monitored for 5 min at 30 °C. The reaction proceeded linearly throughout the 5-min monitoring phase and maintained its linearity for more than 25 min (data not shown). To further validate the assay, two types of controls were performed. Boiling the enzyme (Erf2/4) abolished formation of NADH, showing that there is no measurable background hydrolysis palmitoyl-CoA. Second, a mutant form of Erf2 (Erf2C203S) had no detectable activity.

For the 96-well platform, the production of NADH was monitored with a Biotek Mx fluorimeter (Biotek, Winooski, VT) using 340-nm excitation/465-nm emission. The 200-μl reaction contained 2 mm 2-oxoglutarate (α-ketoglutamic acid), 0.25 mm NAD+, 0.2 mm thiamine pyrophosphate, 0.4–1 μg of purified His-Erf2/FLAG-Erf4, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm dithiothreitol, 32 milliunits 2-oxogluarate dehydrogenase (α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase), and 50 mm sodium phosphate, pH 6.8. The reaction was initiated by the addition of different concentrations of palmitoyl-CoA and monitored for 30 min at 30 °C. The first 10 min of the reaction was analyzed to determine the initial rates of CoASH release. The PAT specific activity was determined from a standard curve of NADH production with different CoASH amounts. In these reactions CoASH was added to the standard PAT reaction mixture (without Erf2·Erf4 complex or palmitoyl-CoA), and the reaction was allowed to proceed to equilibrium before fluorescence was measured (excitation, 340 nm/emission, 465 nm).

To validate the assay, a negative control was used in which the enzyme was boiled. Boiled enzyme produced significantly less fluorescence (<20%), suggesting no significant contribution from sample heterogeneity or nonspecific fluorescence.

Radioactivity-based PAT Assay

Palmitoylation assays were performed as previously described (17) with the following modifications. The reaction consisted of 50 mm sodium phosphate Buffer, pH 7.4, 1 mm β-mercaptoethanol, 10 pmol of purified His-Erf2/FLAG-Erf4, 1 μCi of 30 Ci/mmol (666 nm final concentration) [9,10-3H]palmitoyl-CoA (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) in a total volume of 50 μl with or without 200 pmol of GST-mCherry-Ras2 substrate. For measuring the kinetics of steady-state product formation (palmitoyl-Erf2 or palmitoyl-Ras2), the reaction was allowed to proceed for different time periods ranging from 0 to 60 min at 30 °C and stopped using SDS-PAGE gel loading buffer. The palmitoylated proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE, and autoradiography was performed to determine the labeled proteins in the gel.

For performing the kinetics of autopalmitoylation reaction and measuring the initial rates of the consumption of substrates and the release of products, 20 pmol of purified Erf2·Erf4 was mixed with 240 pmol of [3H]palmitoyl CoA in the presence of 50 mm sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, with 0.5 mm DTT, and aliquots were taken at various intervals ranging from 5 s to 600 s. The components were separated using thin-layer chromatography on a silica G60 plate using n-butanol/water/acetic acid (50/30/20) as the mobile phase. Running the aliquots on a TLC plate effectively terminated the reaction (data not shown). Radioactivity located at the origin corresponded to [3H]palmitoyl-Erf2 (Rf = 0.0). [3H]Palmitoyl-CoA had an Rf = 0.45, and [3H]palmitate had an Rf = 0.9. After allowing the samples to separate in the mobile phase, the plates were air-dried overnight. The spots corresponding to the three species were scraped and placed in scintillation mixture. To determine the efficiency of counting, known amounts of [3H]palmitoyl-CoA and [3H]palmitate were separated using the same mobile phase, dried, and scraped, and the amount of radioactivity was determined. Efficiency corrections were made of 0.7 (palmitate) and 0.6 (palmitoyl-CoA). An efficiency correction of 0.25 was made for [3H]palmitoyl-Erf2. The amount of [3H]palmitoyl-Erf2 was the difference between the amount of hydrolyzed [3H]palmitoyl-CoA and the amount of [3H]palmitate. Based on the specific activity of the [3H]palmitoyl-CoA, we calculated the amount of palmitate released, palmitoylated Erf2 formed, and CoASH released. The amount of CoASH was determined indirectly by subtracting the amount of unused [3H]palmitoyl-CoA at each time point from the total amount in the reaction. When Ras2 was present, a similar approach was used to measure the release of palmitate and CoASH. However, the “origin” was not scraped as it contained heterogeneous species, i.e. palmitoyl-Erf2 and palmitoyl-Ras2. Only spots corresponding to palmitate and palmitoyl-CoA were analyzed.

RESULTS

The DHHC CRD Domain Is Necessary and Sufficient for the Autopalmitoylation of Erf2

The conserved DHHC-CRD domain of PATs encompass 51 residues within the predicted cytoplasmic loop between transmembrane spanning domains 2 and 3. To determine how the DHHC-CRD of Erf2 contributes to autopalmitoylation and Ras2 palmitoyl transfer activity of the Erf2·Erf4 PAT, FLAG epitope-tagged Erf2 (either N or C terminus) proteins (Fig. 1A) were expressed and purified with Erf4 as described earlier (17). The C-terminal epitope tag resulted in a protein with lower activity for autopalmitoylation and palmitoyl transfer to Ras2 (Fig. 1B), and therefore, all subsequent experiments were performed with the N-terminal FLAG-tagged protein. The presence or absence of the N- and C-terminal regions had no measurable effect on the autopalmitoylation activity of Erf2·Erf4; however, deletion of either region dramatically decreased palmitate transfer to Ras2 in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 1C).

FIGURE 1.
Identification of a 182-amino acid residue region of Erf2 required for autopalmitoylation. A, schematic of Erf2 truncation mutants and domains are shown. Black boxes denote the FLAG epitope and are located either at the N or C terminus of the protein. ...

Conserved Residues within the DHHC-CRD Are Required for Autopalmitoylation and Ras2 Transfer Activity

The retention of autopalmitoylation by Erf2 truncation proteins indicated that the catalytic residues for autopalmitoylation were located between amino acid residues 119 and 301. The regions of highest sequence identity included a DPG sequence element and DHHC-CRD domain between TM2 and TM3 as well as a TTXE motif in the C-terminal region after TM3 (Fig. 2). To identify additional residues required for function, 21 mutations were created and tested by the in vivo complementation assay (Fig. 2). Mutations C175S, C178S, R185A, H188A, C189S, C192S, C195S, D200A, H201A, H202A, C203S, C209S, or F218S resulted in loss of function, whereas others (K173A, K/R182A, W205A, and N214S) supported growth in medium containing 5′-FOA and palmitoylation-dependent growth in vivo. Not all mutations in consensus sequences produced non-functional alleles of Erf2. The proline in sequence DPG (Asp-Pro-Gly) and glutamate in sequence TTXE (Thr-Thr-Xaa-Glu) were found in all but one of the yeast and human DHHC PATs. However, alanine substitutions at Pro-132 and Glu-286 had no measurable effect on Erf2 function and were not pursued further. Erf2 CRD mutations comprising the atypical zinc finger (CX2CX9HCX2C) between residues Cys-175 and Cys-195, inclusive, resulted in a loss of function phenotype (Fig. 2). Purification of these mutant proteins was not successful, suggesting that the mutant proteins were structurally unstable (data not shown).

FIGURE 2.
DHHC domain loss of function mutations within Erf2. Upper panel, shown is an amino acid sequence comparison of PAT proteins from S. cerevisiae. Black boxes denote amino acid identity between Erf2 and the other PAT protein. Gray boxes denote amino acid ...

Kinetics of Hydrolysis and Turnover of Palmitoylated Erf2·Erf4

To study the role of the amino acid residues of the active site, thin layer chromatography was used to monitor the products of the autopalmitoylation reaction over time. Surprisingly, steady-state levels of the palmitoyl-Erf2 intermediate occurred by the earliest time point (5 s), suggesting burst kinetics (Fig. 3). As expected, the production of CoASH also showed an initial burst within the first 5 s and then progressed linearly at a reduced rate (~0.04pmol/min/μg of Erf2·Erf4). In contrast, palmitate release proceeded linearly throughout the time course at a rate similar to the post-steady-state release of CoASH (~0.04pmol/min/μg of Erf2·Erf4). To show that there is in fact a buildup to the steady-state level of palmitoyl-Erf2, we performed the reaction at 4 °C (Fig. 3A, inset). By slowing down the reaction, we were able to observe the simultaneous increase in the formation of palmitoyl-Erf2 and the production of CoASH. Under these conditions, we were unable to detect the release of palmitate from palmitoyl-Erf2. Therefore, based on the TLC assay, the catalyzed formation of palmitoyl-Erf2, the release of CoASH, and the release of palmitate were consistent with the notion of a burst in the formation of autopalmitoylated Erf2 followed by a slower rate of hydrolysis of the thioester linkage and regeneration of the enzyme. The successive formation of CoASH in the reaction was due to the turnover of the palmitoyl-Erf2 species. The slope of this phase was similar to the rate of the palmitate released, indicating that during the initial burst in activity, the substrate was used for palmitoylating the enzyme. Any further release of palmitate originated from the regeneration of the enzyme.

FIGURE 3.
Thin layer chromatography assay of Erf2 autopalmitoylation and hydrolysis. A, shown is the time course of the production of CoASH, [3H]palmitoyl-Erf2, and hydrolysis of the [3H]palmitoyl-Erf2 thioester to [3H]palmitate. Time points were taken throughout ...

To determine the number of active sites in the enzyme, the concentration of Erf2·Erf4 (10, 20, 30, and 40 pmol) was varied, and the production of CoASH was measured during the linear phase of the reaction (>25 s) (Fig. 3B). The number of active sites was determined by extrapolating the catalytic rates for CoASH released from each concentration of Erf2·Erf4 to time 0. As a control, we performed the same experiment using 40 pmol of the catalytically inactive Erf2C203S/Erf4 (shown at the bottom of the graph). Plotting the pmol of CoASH produced as a function of the pmol of Erf2·Erf4 initially added to the reaction resulted in a linear relationship with a slope of 0.65 (Fig. 3B, inset). Assuming the purified enzyme is 65% active, this is consistent with one active site per Erf2·Erf4 dimer.

A Fluorescence-based Assay to Measure the Autopalmitoylation of DHHC PATs

Current methods to measure palmitoylation use [3H]palmitoyl-CoA and monitor the steady-state palmitoylation of the PAT followed by transfer to the respective protein substrate. Problems of sensitivity, cost, and inability to measure the turnover of palmitate on the enzyme have made studies of the autopalmitoylation reaction difficult. To this end we have developed a method to measure the autopalmitoylation reaction continuously by coupling the release of CoASH (Fig. 4A) to the reduction of NAD+ to NADH by α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (α-KDH) and monitoring the reaction by NADH fluorescence emission at 465 nm (22). When NAD+ and α-ketoglutarate are present in excess over CoASH, the reaction proceeds with approximately zero-order kinetics (23). This reaction indirectly measures the turnover of the palmitoylated enzyme by monitoring the production of CoASH from palmitoyl-CoA and does not require the addition of the in vivo target substrate. As a proof of principle, we monitored the Erf2·Erf4-dependent production of NADH continuously. In this assay, the accumulation of NADH is linear with time (<10 min, data not shown) and is dependent on active Erf2·Erf4 enzyme, as is demonstrated by the reduction of the NADH fluorescent signal in the Erf2 (C203)/Erf4 and boiled samples (Fig. 4B). There is a small amount of nonspecific activity in the Erf2 (C203S)/Erf4 sample that is absent from the boiled sample. As we are unable to detect activity from Erf2 (C203S)/Erf4 by other means (5), this small amount of activity most likely represents a contaminant.

FIGURE 4.
Determination of the pH profile of Erf2·Erf4 activity by coupling CoASH production to the reduction of NAD+. A, shown is a schematic representation of the fluorescence-based autopalmitoylation assay. B, shown is a graph of the continuous catalyst-dependent ...

We next examined the NADH formation rate catalyzed by the wild type enzyme after reaching steady-state using the coupled assay in a 96-well platform. This apparent rate provides a measure of the release of CoASH and the hydrolysis of the palmitoyl-Erf2 thioester. The specific activity increases with increasing concentrations of palmitoyl-CoA, approaching saturation at a substrate concentration of 90 μm. Under the conditions used in the assay, concentrations greater than 90 μm appear to be above the critical micelle concentration of palmitoyl-CoA (24) (data not shown).

The autopalmitoylation reaction exhibited pH dependence (Fig. 4C). Fitting the data to obtain the Vmax and Km at different pH values revealed that at the pH 7.4 the WT enzyme had a Vmax of 45 pmol/min/μg, a Km of 53 μm, and a kcat of 2 min−1 in the absence of its cognate Ras2 substrate. The dependence of Vmax and the Km and kcat on pH is shown in Table 3 and Fig. 4C, respectively. The presence of a sharp transition between pH values of 6.8 and 7.4 suggests the involvement of titratable groups with a pKa of ~7.2 (Fig. 4D). In Fig. 4E, the catalytic efficiency (log (kcat/Km)) is plotted as a function of pH. There is a transition in the data points at a pH of ~7.1, which is consistent with the pKa value determined in Fig. 4D. The presence of one ascending slope with a slope of 0.7 ± 0.2 is consistent with the dependence of activity on one titratable group in the enzyme. The dependence does not appear to be due to the pKa values of the titratable phosphates of the CoASH moiety. These pKa values are less than the pH values used in the experiment.

TABLE 3
Reduced coenzyme A-coupled assay determination of Erf2/Erf4 activity versus pH

In addition, we measured the rate of CoASH release and palmitate hydrolysis from Erf2 mutants. Erf2 mutants R185A, H201A, C203S, C209S, and F218S were co-expressed with Erf4 and purified, and their activities were monitored using the coupled fluorescence assay (Fig. 5). Surprisingly, rapid autopalmitoylation of C209S and R185A was observed despite the apparent lack of function in the complementation assay (Fig. 2). Table 4 shows the apparent rates calculated for the wild type (WT) enzyme and the different mutants. R185A and C209S showed nearly a 2-fold increase in the rate of release of CoASH and greater than a 4-fold increase for the catalytic efficiencies, respectively, when compared with the wild type enzyme. In contrast to these two residues, F218S showed a decrease in activity, consistent with our observations from the complementation assay (Fig. 2). Although C203S and H201A appear to have activity greater than the boiled sample, a result that most likely represents a contaminant in our enzyme preparations, these mutants possess very little activity using radioactive [3H]palmitoyl-CoA as substrate (5). These particular mutants, therefore, represent the base-line activity measurement for the assay. These results indicate that mutants in the cysteine-rich domain have a direct effect on autopalmitoylation and, therefore, play a key role in the activity of the enzyme.

FIGURE 5.
Determination of kinetic parameters using the fluorescence-based CoASH-coupled assay for Erf2 and Erf2 mutants. shown is a graphical representation of the fluorescence-based coupled assay monitoring the production of reduced CoA for wild type Erf2·Erf4 ...
TABLE 4
Reduced coenzyme A-coupled assay determination of Erf2 mutant protein Activity

The Role of DHHC-CRD in the Formation of Autopalmitoylated Erf2·Erf4 and Transfer of Palmitate to Ras2

We next examined the role of conserved residues within the DHHC CRD in formation of palmitoyl-Erf2. Wild type and mutant Erf2 proteins were incubated with 50 μm [3H]palmitoyl-CoA for 0.5, 10, 30, and 60 min. In wild type enzyme (Fig. 6A), formation of palmitoyl-Erf2 reached a steady state within 30 s. The same was true for the C209S mutant. Mutants H201A, F218S, and R185A, however, did not show the initial burst in activity. H201A appeared to reach a comparable steady-state level as the wild type enzyme but with a delay. The delay in reaching steady state for F218S was greater than 60 min. The steady-state levels of palmitoyl-Erf2 for the R185A and C209S mutants was a fraction of that of the WT enzyme; ~10% for R185A and 50% for C209S. Autopalmitoylation of C203S could not be detected in this assay, which was consistent with our previous observations (5). In summary, mutants R185A and C209S appeared to have greater autopalmitoylation activity and lower steady-state levels of palmitoyl-Erf2. Mutant H201A under went delayed autopalmitoylation with a greatly reduced rate of palmitoyl-Erf2 thioester hydrolysis and, therefore, showed little to no turnover of the palmitoyl-enzyme intermediate. F218S showed both delayed autopalmitoylation and reduced steady-state levels of palmitoyl-Erf2.

FIGURE 6.
Steady-state formation of palmitoylated Erf2 and the effect of point mutations on palmitoylated Erf2 and palmitoylated Ras2 accumulation using a gel-based [3H]palmitoyl-CoA incorporation assay. A, shown is an autoradiograph of the time course for the ...

We next investigated the palmitoylation of Ras2 using the Erf2 mutants R185A, H201A, C203S, C209S, and F218S. [3H]Palmitoyl-CoA, GST-mCherry-Ras2CT35, and Erf2·Erf4 complex were combined for 0.5,10, 30, and 60 min. The reaction was terminated using SDS-gel loading buffer, and the products were separated using SDS-PAGE (Fig. 6B). Transfer of palmitate to Ras2 was detected for the wild type protein at the initial time (30s) and increased over time. After 60 min, mutants R185A, C209S, and F218S showed rates similar to WT for transferring palmitate to Ras2. We did not detect transfer using H201A or C203S. Except for the H201A and C203S mutant Erf2 proteins, the mutated enzymes were capable of palmitoylating Ras2. However, the kinetics of Ras2 palmitoylation differed quite significantly than what was observed with autopalmitoylation (Fig. 6A). Although the steady-state levels of autopalmitoylation varied drastically between mutants, these data demonstrated that the association of the Ras2 substrate with the palmitoyl-enzyme had a major influence on palmitate transfer.

Decreased Hydrolysis of Palmitoyl-Erf2 and Enhanced Palmitate Transfer in the Presence of Ras Substrate

We next examined the effect of transfer of palmitate to the substrate on the kinetics of the autopalmitoylation and hydrolysis of palmitoyl-Erf2 using the TLC assay (Fig. 7). The production of CoASH was determined indirectly from the decrease in the amount of [3H]palmitoyl-CoA. It should be noted that it was not possible to independently monitor the formation of palmitoyl-Erf2 or palmitoyl-Ras2 as they both have an Rf of 0 and are found at the origin on the TLC plate. In the absence of Ras2 substrate, there is a burst followed by a slower, linear increase of CoASH production. The release of palmitate lacked the burst but followed a linear rate similar to that of CoASH when Ras2 substrate was absent. Interestingly, when Ras2 was present, the production of CoASH was increased, suggesting that the activity of Erf2·Erf4 was increased. In addition, the rate of palmitate hydrolysis from palmitoyl-Erf2 decreased from 0.05 pmol/s to 0.01pmol/s.

FIGURE 7.
Ras2 mediated enhancement of Erf2·Erf4 activity using TLC separation of hydrolyzed [3H]palmitoyl-CoA species. Palmitoylation reactions were performed as described under “Experimental Procedures.” After the assembly of the reagents ...

DISCUSSION

Despite the importance of protein palmitoylation in a variety of cellular processes involved in cancer, cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, and neurological disorders, the enzymatic mechanism of DHHC PATs has remained poorly understood (25). In this study the S. cerevisiae Ras PAT, Erf2·Erf4 was used as a model system to elucidate the basic mechanism of palmitoyl transfer. Genetic and biochemical analyses of Erf2 mutations have allowed us to dissect the two steps of the palmitoylation reaction, namely autopalmitoylation and formation of a palmitoyl enzyme intermediate and transfer of palmitate to Ras. The following conclusions can be drawn. First, the highly conserved DHHC motif appears to play a central role in autopalmitoylation of the enzyme and palmitoyl transfer to substrate. The substitution of the DHHC cysteine with serine or alanine abolishes enzyme activity in several published systems (4, 5, 7, 14, 26, 29). The initial burst in autopalmitoylation is abolished by mutating Cys-203 of the DHHC motif, consistent with it being the side chain thioesterfied during the autopalmitoylation reaction. In contrast, mutating Erf2H201A uncoupled autopalmitoylation from palmitate transfer. There is one catalytic site per enzyme molecule, and autopalmitoylation is regulated by one ionization group, which has a pKa of 7.2. As described in detail below, His-201 is an excellent candidate for the pH-sensitive group. Finally, we have demonstrated that in the absence a protein substrate, the palmitoyl-enzyme thioester is prone to hydrolysis and that when substrate is present, this rate of hydrolysis decreases 90%. The biochemical characterization of mammalian protein acyltransferases has lagged in comparison to the yeast system. This is partly due to the difficulty purifying the mammalian enzymes in sufficient quantities for kinetic analysis. The expression and purification method we developed in yeast was an essential first step in being able to carry out these experiments. The mechanistic implications of these observations are discussed below.

Novel palmitoylation assays described herein have allowed us to probe the catalytic mechanism of protein palmitoylation. Sequence conservation among DHHC PATs and in vivo functional assays focused attention on the loop between transmembrane 2 and 3 of Erf2 as being necessary and sufficient for autopalmitoylation but not sufficient for transfer of palmitate to Ras. Differences, however, do exist among DHHC PATs. A small subset of DHHC proteins lack the conserved cysteine and histidine residues that constitute the CRD that have led to their annotation as zinc finger proteins. The non-CRD DHHC proteins include Akr1, Akr2, and Pfa5 in yeast and DHHC22 in humans. Mutating the conserved cysteines and histidines residues predicted to bind zinc in Erf2 might destabilize the protein, thus, interfering with purification efforts. If the CRD does bind zinc, it is not required for palmitoyl transferase activity in general. However, the binding of zinc may have an effect on the autopalmitoylation burst seen with Erf2·Erf4. Analysis of the non-CRD DHHC enzymes using the same approach that we have used for Erf2·Erf4 will provide an answer as to the role of zinc binding on the function of the CRD.

What has emerged from this study is that the PAT reaction occurs in two steps. In the first step palmitoyl-CoA undergoes nucleophilic attack by a deprotonated cysteine of the enzyme to create the palmitoyl-PAT product. We observed that the first step of the reaction appeared to go to completion within a few seconds. Although we have yet to analyze our reaction using stop-flow spectroscopy, we were able to slow the reaction and monitor it in presteady-state conditions. Intriguingly, the production of CoASH and palmitoyl-Erf2 increased immediately, whereas the hydrolysis of the palmitate from palmitoyl-Erf2 was undetectable. Once formed, palmitoyl-PAT either transfers the palmitoyl group to a protein substrate, such as Ras2, or reacts with water (hydrolysis) to release free fatty acid. The real time autopalmitoylation fluorescence assay has proven to be a reliable and sensitive tool for investigating the post steady-state rate of regeneration of the enzyme resulting from the hydrolysis of palmitate from palmitoyl-Erf2. The assay was used to address the chemistry of the autopalmitoylation reaction. The pKa for autopalmitoylation was found to be 7.2. Although the microenvironment can affect the pKa of an amino acid side chain by several units compared with the side chain of the amino acid in solution, the most likely candidate is a cysteine or histidine residue. In addition, we determined that the dependence on activity results from a single titratable group. We hypothesize that to generate the reactive cysteine nucleophile (thiolate anion) (8), as opposed to other nucleophiles (e.g. for example, aspartate (27)), that can attack the incoming palmitate donor, a basic deprotonating agent is required. This group will be sensitive to the pH environment as the efficiency of the reaction will be modulated by the extent of availability of the deprotonating agent. One possible model is that a histidine and cysteine work in concert to produce a nucleophile capable of attacking the incoming palmitoyl-CoA thioester. In this model, His-201 would deprotonate Cys-203 to create the critical nucleophile. Alternatively, the change in pH may deprotonate the cysteine directly to create the nucleophile.

At steady state, the rate of the Erf2·Erf4 autopalmitoylation reaction was relatively slow in the pH range from 5.7 to 6.8. However, as the pH increased to 7.4, the activity of the enzyme significantly increases and was maintained through pH 8.6. The activity of the enzyme was undetectable above pH 9.2 (data not shown). This increase in activity of Erf2·Erf4 appeared to be due to an increase in hydrolysis rate. In addition, the apparent Km of the substrate is reduced with increasing pH, suggesting greater affinity of the palmitoyl-CoA for the enzyme within this pH range. It is conceivable that an intermediate of such nature requires association with various charged residues for stability. This phenomenon has also been observed with the citrate synthases where histidines stabilize the intermediate (27). In DHHC-CRD-containing PATs such as Erf2·Erf4, we speculate that this role is fulfilled by many of the conserved histidines in the CRD and that the optimal pH to produce the highest affinity is within the pH range of 7.4–8.6. Structural studies of the active site will greatly aid in understanding the basis of the hydrolytic activity, but given that DHHC-PATs are integral membrane proteins, attempts to date to crystallize PATs have been unsuccessful.

The rapid burst formation of palmitoyl-Erf2 was not necessarily expected and implies that in the absence of protein substrate, enzyme exists in a continuously palmitoylated state. This can be altered by mutation. For example, mutations in Erf2 residues C209S and R185A had reduced steady-state levels of palmitoyl-Erf2 that appear to correlate with the function of the enzyme in vivo as determined by the growth characteristics of the yeast cells. However, with respect to CoASH production, our results indicated that both variants have higher initial hydrolysis rates than the wild type enzyme, although they lack or are severely diminished for in vivo function. The reduction in the steady-state amounts of palmitoyl-Erf2 during autopalmitoylation for mutants C209S and R185A is also consistent with increased hydrolysis rates. One possible explanation is that these mutations in some way expose the active site, thereby increasing hydrolysis. In contrast, other mutants, such as H201A, F218S, and C203S, lacked the initial burst in palmitoyl-Erf2 and exhibited reduced or no hydrolysis. Finally, the presence of Ras2 also reduced the rate of hydrolysis of palmitoyl-Erf2. The Ras2 substrate might (a) compete with water at the same site on Erf2·Erf4, presumably the active site and (b) conform the enzyme to a more active state, possibly by stabilizing the enzyme. Consistent with this notion, Erf2 mutants R185A, C209S, and F218S, which demonstrate less autopalmitoylation activity based on their steady-state levels of palmitoyl-Erf2, showed similar rates of palmitate transfer to Ras2 as wild type Erf2·Erf4 (Fig. 6B).

The formation of a stable palmitoyl-enzyme in palmitoylation mediated by PAT enzymes makes them different from the serine palmitoyl transferases, where the enzyme positions the serine and the palmitoyl-CoA to form the final product (28). With respect to multisubstrate binding, the PATs do resemble carnitine palmitoyl transferase II more so than the serine palmitoyl transferases (29). In carnitine palmitoyl transferases, the palmitoyl-CoA binds first, followed by the carnitine. In the case of Erf2·Erf4, autopalmitoylation is the first event followed by the binding and the transfer to the second substrate, Ras2, although we cannot rule out that the enzyme can bind the Ras2 substrate in the absence of autopalmitoylation. An active site histidine is also found in carnitine palmitoyl transferase-I (CPT-I) and CPT-II, but no acyl-enzyme intermediates are formed.

The transfer of the palmitate to Ras2 may also involve the His/Cys catalytic core. Being a slower, non-hydrolyzable mutant of Erf2, we propose that His-201 acts as the primary nucleophile generator in transfer. Even the addition of imidazole in trans (data not shown) could not rescue the loss of transfer in H201A, suggesting that this mutation is non-reversible. We speculate that the H201A mutation alters the active site in such a way that water or a deprotonated cysteine cannot attack, as evident from no hydrolysis, and that Ras2 cannot participate in the transfer. Along the same lines, an acid-base catalysis scheme would be employed whereby His-201 acts as the base to extract a proton from Cys-318 of the Ras2 C terminus. This would produce an acidic thiolate anion on Ras2, which could act as a nucleophile on the palmitoyl-enzyme thioester. Given two His/Cys dyads, the association of the substrate, Ras2, may be required to “neutralize” the His-201-containing dyad, so that it cannot participate or interfere with the formation of palmitoyl-Erf2. In support of this notion, even if some of the mutants of Erf2·Erf4 including R185A, C209S, and F218S autopalmitoylated with lower steady-state levels of palmitoyl-Erf2 or with a timing delay, they could still transfer to Ras2 to a relatively similar extent as the wild type protein. Clearly, there is more work needed to fully understand the molecular mechanism of these enzymes.

With the linking of molecular diseases to DHHC family members, the in vivo ramifications of these data are just now coming to light. For example, the mammalian DHHC9 protein was identified to possess the highest degree of homology to Erf2. Like Erf2, DHHC9 also appears to have four transmembrane spanning domains. It also requires an accessory protein, Gcp16, to form a functional Ras PAT. The DHHC9·Gcp16 complex palmitoylates farnesylated H-ras and N-ras as substrates but cannot utilize N-terminal-palmitoylated substrates, like GAP-43 (30). Mutations in the gene for DHHC9 are the first instance of a defect in a posttranslational modification enzyme causing X-linked mental retardation. For example, a frameshift and splice-site mutation as well as mutations in the highly conserved residues Arg-148 and Pro-150 of DHHC9 have been identified in 4 of 250 families with X-linked mental retardation (31). Presumably these mutations result in decreased palmitoylation, but the molecular mechanism remains to be determined. Using assays described in this study, autopalmitoylation, hydrolysis, and phospho-transfer all contribute to the function of DHHC PAT, and a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms will provide insights into diseases involving palmitoylation.

Supplementary Material

Author profile:

Acknowledgments

We thank Gloria Ferreira, Ronald “Ken” Keller, Maurine Linder, and members of the Deschenes laboratory for critical reading of the manuscript and many helpful discussions.

*This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants CA50211 and GM73976 (to R. J. D.).

This article was selected as a Paper of the Week.

2The abbreviations used are:

PAT
protein acyltransferase
CRD
cysteine-rich domain
5′-FOA
5′-fluoroorotic acid.

REFERENCES

1. Casey P. J. (1995) Science 268, 221–225 [PubMed]
2. Nadolski M. J., Linder M. E. (2007) FEBS J. 274, 5202–5210 [PubMed]
3. Bartels D. J., Mitchell D. A., Dong X., Deschenes R. J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6775–6787 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Roth A. F., Feng Y., Chen L., Davis N. G. (2002) J. Cell Biol. 159, 23–28 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Lobo S., Greentree W. K., Linder M. E., Deschenes R. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 41268–41273 [PubMed]
6. Linder M. E., Deschenes R. J. (2007) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 74–84 [PubMed]
7. Mitchell D. A., Vasudevan A., Linder M. E., Deschenes R. J. (2006) J. Lipid Res. 47, 1118–1127 [PubMed]
8. Cadwallader K. A., Paterson H., Macdonald S. G., Hancock J. F. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4722–4730 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Coats S. G., Booden M. A., Buss J. E. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 12926–12934 [PubMed]
10. Linder M. E., Deschenes R. J. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 4311–4320 [PubMed]
11. Politis E. G., Roth A. F., Davis N. G. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10156–10163 [PubMed]
12. Putilina T., Wong P., Gentleman S. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 195, 219–226 [PubMed]
13. Mesilaty-Gross S., Reich A., Motro B., Wides R. (1999) Gene 231, 173–186 [PubMed]
14. Fukata Y., Iwanaga T., Fukata M. (2006) Methods 40, 177–182 [PubMed]
15. Sherman F., Fink G. R., Hicks J. B. (1986) Laboratory Course Manual: Methods in Yeast Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
16. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 153, 163–168 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Budde C., Schoenfish M. J., Linder M. E., Deschenes R. J. (2006) Methods 40, 143–150 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Robzyk K., Kassir Y. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3790. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Dong X., Mitchell D. A., Lobo S., Zhao L., Bartels D. J., Deschenes R. J. (2003) Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 6574–6584 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Ma J., Ptashne M. (1987) Cell 48, 847–853 [PubMed]
21. Boeke J. D., Trueheart J., Natsoulis G., Fink G. R. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 154, 164–175 [PubMed]
22. Garland P. B., Shepherd D., Yates D. W. (1965) Biochem. J. 97, 587–594 [PubMed]
23. Massey V. (1960) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 38, 447–460 [PubMed]
24. De Vendittis E., Palumbo G., Parlato G., Bocchini V. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 115, 278–286 [PubMed]
25. Tsutsumi R., Fukata Y., Fukata M. (2008) Pflugers Arch. 456, 1199–1206 [PubMed]
26. Sharma C., Yang X. H., Hemler M. E. (2008) Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 3415–3425 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Kurz L. C., Constantine C. Z., Jiang H., Kappock T. J. (2009) Biochemistry 48, 7878–7891 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Hanada K. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1632, 16–30 [PubMed]
29. Mann W. R., Yan B., Dragland C. J., Bell P. A. (1995) J. Enzyme Inhib. 9, 303–308 [PubMed]
30. Swarthout J. T., Lobo S., Farh L., Croke M. R., Greentree W. K., Deschenes R. J., Linder M. E. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 31141–31148 [PubMed]
31. Raymond F. L., Tarpey P. S., Edkins S., Tofts C., O'Meara S., Teague J., Butler A., Stevens C., Barthorpe S., Buck G., Cole J., Dicks E., Gray K., Halliday K., Hills K., Hinton J., Jones D., Menzies A., Perry J., Raine K., Shepherd R., Small A., Varian J., Widaa S., Mallya U., Moon J., Luo Y., Shaw M., Boyle J., Kerr B., Turner G., Quarrell O., Cole T., Easton D. F., Wooster R., Bobrow M., Schwartz C. E., Gecz J., Stratton M. R., Futreal P. A. (2007) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 982–987 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology