PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of springeropenLink to Publisher's site
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
 
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 December; 26(8): 941–945.
Published online 2010 June 5. doi:  10.1007/s10554-010-9647-7
PMCID: PMC2991165

Use of the anterior-posterior chest diameter in CT: reduction in radiation dose?

In recent years, computed tomography (CT) angiography has emerged as a reliable non-invasive method for the assessment of coronary artery disease, coronary anatomy and cardiac function [117]. Multiple studies involving over several thousands of patients have established that CT angiography is highly accurate for delineation of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis [1823]. CT angiography may also reveal the total plaque burden, i.e. both calcified and non-calcified components, for individual patients with coronary atherosclerosis [2435]. With its high negative predictive value cardiac CT is best suited to the evaluation of patients with a low or intermediate risk of coronary disease, allowing the non-invasive exclusion of coronary disease at relatively low cost and risk [20, 3647]. However, the appropriate radiation dose remains an important issue in cardiac CT. A too low radiation dose may result in a high level of image noise and therefore in non-evaluable images. Conversely, using higher radiation exposure levels may put the patient at unnecessary risk of radiation damage [4856].

In the current issue of the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, Rogalla et al. [57] compared tube current adaptation based on three body mass index categories versus the anterior-posterior chest diameter for radiation dose optimization in patients undergoing dynamic volume cardiac CT. The anterior-posterior chest diameter of the patient’s chest was chosen as a means to individualize the required tube load in cardiac CT with the aim of reducing inter-individual variation in technical image quality. Two cardiac imaging centers participated in the study which comprised a total of 40 evaluable patients. Twenty patients underwent a prospectively triggered 320-slice single beat cardiac CT using the X-ray tube current (mA) manually adjusted to the patient’s body mass index (group I). In 20 subsequent patients, the tube current was adapted according to the patient’s anterior-posterior chest diameter (group II). All other parameters were kept constant. Image noise was defined as the standard deviation of attenuation values and measured using a region of interest in the descending aorta. Variation in image noise was statistically compared between both patient groups. Average and standard deviation of pixel noise were 29.1 and 14.8 Hounsfield Units in group I and 28.0 and 4.2 Hounsfield Units in group II. Inter-individual variation of pixel noise was significantly lower in group II versus group I.

The authors concluded that tube current adaptation based on anterior-posterior chest diameter was superior to stepwise adaptation based on body mass index for optimizing radiation dose in dynamic volume cardiac CT. Therefore, this approach limits unnecessary radiation dose while ensuring diagnostic image quality in patients with diverse body habitus. The current study at least suggests that tube current adaptation to the patient’s chest diameter is better suited for constant technical image quality than adaptation to the body mass index in three categories. Since individual variation of noise values are reduced with the anterior-posterior chest diameter technique, smaller patients receive less radiation dose whereas larger patients achieve improved image quality. The authors propose a simple method to account for variations in thoracic dimension between patients in order to predict the required tube settings for CT coronary angiography, thereby reducing inter-individual variation in image quality. This method ensures the lowest radiation dose for every individual, at the same time preserving adequate diagnostic image quality.

Currently, there are pressing questions about radiation safety of cardiac CT scans. The median exposure of CT angiography is roughly equivalent to 600 chest X-rays (12 mSv). Traditional angiography exposes patients to roughly half the dose of CT angiography. However, the radiation exposure of almost 2,000 people having 64-slice cardiac CT images at 50 medical centers in different countries may vary more than sixfold [58]. Effective strategies to reduce radiation dose, such as prospective gating, ECG-correlated modulation of the tube current, and tube voltage below 100 keV, are becoming more and more available. In a recent paper by Leschka et al. [59], it was shown that adjustment of the scan length of CT coronary angiography using the images from calcium scoring instead of the scout was associated with a 16% reduction in radiation dose of dual-source CT coronary angiography. In a large multicenter study of coronary CT angiography in patients with excellent heart rate control, Labounty et al. [60] reported that the use of minimal padding (i.e. additional surrounding X-ray beam on time), was associated with a substantial reduction in radiation dose together with preserved image interpretability. Nonetheless, heart imaging tests should be used cautiously to minimize patient exposure to ionizing radiation. Cardiac imaging studies exposing patients to ionizing radiation should be ordered only after thoughtful consideration of the potential benefits to the patient, thereby keeping in line with the established so-called ‘appropriateness’ criteria. In recent years, for all cardiac imaging modalities appropriateness criteria have been established with the primary aim to adhere to the primary indications. As to CT angiography, Ayyad et al. [61] showed that the number of appropriate CT examinations increased from 69.5 to 78.5% during the period from 2006 to 2007, whereas the number of inappropriate examinations decreased from 11.5 to 4.6%. Interestingly, cardiologists were more likely than non-cardiologists to order CT examinations that were appropriate during the study period. However, a more recent study by Miller et al. [62] suggested that still a significant proportion (46%) of the coronary CT angiography studies are for indications not covered by the published appropriateness criteria. Adherence to the appropriateness criteria is of paramount importance in clinical practice. This policy will have a significant impact on physician decision making and patient care, such as exposure to a minimal radiation dose.

To summarize, the anterior-posterior chest diameter adapted tube current in dynamic volume CT coronary angiography, as proposed by Rogalla et al. [57], provides a new simple and practical approach to keep image quality constant by accounting for differences in patient size. Maintaining a constant image quality in CT, independent of patient body habitus, significantly contributes to a substantially improved diagnostic image quality together with a reduced radiation dose for the patient.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Footnotes

Editorial comment on the article of Rogalla et al. (doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9630-3)

References

1. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Wall EE. Anatomical and functional imaging techniques: basically similar or fundamentally different? Neth Heart J. 2007;15:43–44. doi: 10.1007/BF03085952. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Juwana YB, Wirianta J, Suryapranata H, Boer MJ. Left main coronary artery stenosis undetected by 64-slice computed tomography: a word of caution. Neth Heart J. 2007;15:255–256. doi: 10.1007/BF03085993. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Wijpkema JS, Dorgelo J, Willems TP, et al. Discordance between anatomical and functional coronary stenosis severity. Neth Heart J. 2007;15:5–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Bax JJ, Lamb H, Dibbets P, Pelikan H, et al. Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:1299–1305. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01231-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Wall EE, Heidendal GA, Hollander W, Westera G, Roos JP. I-123 labeled hexadecenoic acid in comparison with thallium-201 for myocardial imaging in coronary heart disease. A preliminary study. Eur J Nucl Med. 1980;5:401–405. doi: 10.1007/BF00261781. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Bavelaar-Croon CD, Pauwels EK, Wall EE. Gated single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial imaging: a new tool in clinical cardiology. Am Heart J. 2001;141:383–390. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.112780. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Molhoek SG, Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, et al. Comparison of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with sinus rhythm versus chronic atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1506–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.028. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD. Universal definition of myocardial infarction; joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF task force for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2525–2538. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm355. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Lennep JE, Westerveld HT, Lennep HW, Zwinderman AH, Erkelens DW, Wall EE. Apolipoprotein concentrations during treatment and recurrent coronary artery disease events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:2408–2413. [PubMed]
10. Bavelaar-Croon CD, Kayser HW, Wall EE, et al. Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. Radiology. 2000;217:572–575. [PubMed]
11. Wall EE, Dijkman PR, Roos A, et al. Diagnostic significance of gadolinium-DTPA (diethylene- triamine penta-acetic acid) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction: its potential in assessing reperfusion. Br Heart J. 1990;63:12–17. doi: 10.1136/hrt.63.1.12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Dijkman PR, Wall EE, Roos A, et al. Acute, subacute, and chronic myocardial infarction: quantitative analysis of gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology. 1991;180:147–151. [PubMed]
13. Wal RM, Werkum JW, le Cocq d’Armandville MC, et al. Giant aneurysm of an aortocoronary venous bypass graft compressing the right ventricle. Neth Heart J. 2007;15:252–254. doi: 10.1007/BF03085992. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Leeuw JG, Wardeh A, Sramek A, Wall EE. Pseudo-aortic dissection after primary PCI. Neth Heart J. 2007;15:265–266. doi: 10.1007/BF03085997. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Braun S, Wall EE, Emanuelsson S, Kobrin I. Effects of a new calcium antagonist, mibefradil (Ro 40–5967), on silent ischemia in patients with stable chronic angina pectoris: a multicenter placebo-controlled study. The mibefradil international study group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:317–322. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00472-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. ten Kate GJ, Wuestink AC, Feyter PJ. Coronary artery anomalies detected by MSCT-angiography in the adult. Neth Heart J. 2008;16:369–375. doi: 10.1007/BF03086181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Wall EE, Bax JJ. Multi-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. Acute Card Care. 2007;9:214–221. doi: 10.1080/17482940701589275. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Groen JM, Greuter MJ, Vliegenthart R, et al. Calcium scoring using 64-slice MDCT, dual source CT and EBT: a comparative phantom study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:547–556. doi: 10.1007/s10554-007-9282-0. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Anatomic correlates of a normal perfusion scan using 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.046. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Bakx AL, Wall EE, Braun S, Emanuelsson H, Bruschke AV, Kobrin I. Effects of the new calcium antagonist mibefradil (Ro 40–5967) on exercise duration in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris: a multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Ro 40–5967 International Study Group. Am Heart J. 1995;130:748–757. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90073-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:145–148. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.092. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Jongbloed MR, Lamb HJ, Bax JJ, et al. Noninvasive visualization of the cardiac venous system using multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:749–753. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.035. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2508–2514. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.080. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.070. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, et al. Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome: plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:216–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Nooijer R, Verkleij CJ, der Thüsen JH, et al. Lesional overexpression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 promotes intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced lesions but not at earlier stages of atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:340–346. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000197795.56960.64. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Hoogendoorn LI, Pattynama PM, Buis B, Geest RJ, Wall EE, Roos A. Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:845–848. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80429-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Laarse A, Kerkhof PL, Vermeer F, et al. Relation between infarct size and left ventricular performance assessed in patients with first acute myocardial infarction randomized to intracoronary thrombolytic therapy or to conventional treatment. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:1–7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91294-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Wall EE, Hollander W, Heidendal GA, Westera G, Majid PA, Roos JP. Dynamic myocardial scintigraphy with 123I-labeled free fatty acids in patients with myocardial infarction. Eur J Nucl Med. 1981;6:383–389. [PubMed]
30. Vliegen HW, Doornbos J, Roos A, Jukema JW, Bekedam MA, Wall EE. Value of fast gradient echo magnetic resonance angiography as an adjunct to coronary arteriography in detecting and confirming the course of clinically significant coronary artery anomalies. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:773–776. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00866-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Hoeven BL, Pires NM, Warda HM, et al. Drug-eluting stents: results, promises and problems. Int J Cardiol. 2005;99:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.01.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Ertaş G, Beusekom HM, Giessen WJ. Late stent thrombosis, endothelialisation and drug-eluting stents. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:177–180. doi: 10.1007/BF03086242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Pluim BM, Lamb HJ, Kayser HW, et al. Functional and metabolic evaluation of the athlete’s heart by magnetic resonance imaging and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Circulation. 1998;97:666–672. [PubMed]
34. Scholte AJ, Schuijf JD, Kharagjitsingh AV, et al. Different manifestations of coronary artery disease by stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary calcium scoring, and multislice CT coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:503–509. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Scholte AJ, Schuijf JD, Kharagjitsingh AV, et al. Prevalence of coronary artery disease and plaque morphology assessed by multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Heart. 2008;94:290–295. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.121921. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Torn M, Bollen WL, Meer FJ, Wall EE, Rosendaal FR. Risks of oral anticoagulant therapy with increasing age. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1527–1532. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.13.1527. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB, et al. Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:33–41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl379. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Ypenburg C, Roes SD, Bleeker GB, et al. Effect of total scar burden on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:657–660. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.115. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Roos A, Matheijssen NA, Doornbos J, et al. Myocardial infarct size after reperfusion therapy: assessment with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;176:517–521. [PubMed]
40. Roos A, Matheijssen NA, Doornbos J, Dijkman PR, Rugge PR, Wall EE. Myocardial infarct sizing and assessment of reperfusion by magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Int J Card Imaging. 1991;7:133–138. doi: 10.1007/BF01798054. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Rugge FP, Wall EE, Dijkman PR, Louwerenburg HW, Roos A, Bruschke AV. Usefulness of ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging in healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1233–1237. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90754-M. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Holman ER, Jonbergen HP, Dijkman PR, Laarse A, Roos A, Wall EE. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging studies with enzymatic indexes of myocardial necrosis for quantification of myocardial infarct size. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:1036–1040. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90569-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Bleeker GB, Schalij MJ, Boersma E, et al. Relative merits of M-mode echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging for prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.068. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Ypenburg C, Sieders A, Bleeker GB, et al. Myocardial contractile reserve predicts improvement in left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am Heart J. 2007;154:1160–1165. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.035. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Ypenburg C, Wall EE, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Imaging in cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Neth Heart J. 2008;16:S36–S40. doi: 10.1007/BF03086204. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Nemes A, Geleijnse ML, Geuns RJ, et al. Dobutamine stress MRI versus threedimensional contrast echocardiography: it’s all black and white. Neth Heart J. 2008;16:217–218. doi: 10.1007/BF03086148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Geest RJ, Niezen RA, Wall EE, Roos A, Reiber JH. Automated measurement of volume flow in the ascending aorta using MR velocity maps: evaluation of inter- and intraobserver variability in healthy volunteers. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:904–911. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199811000-00013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Holman ER, Erven L, Wall EE, Bax JJ. Right ventricular pacing can induce ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1642–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.072. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Bleeker GB, Holman ER, Steendijk P, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2243–2250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.067. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Bleeker GB, Bax JJ, Fung JW, et al. Clinical versus echocardiographic parameters to assess response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:260–263. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.030. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Rugge FP, Boreel JJ, Wall EE, et al. Cardiac first-pass and myocardial perfusion in normal subjects assessed by sub-second Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15:959–965. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199111000-00010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Wall EE, Vliegen HW, Roos A, Bruschke AV. Magnetic resonance imaging in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1995;92:2723–2739. [PubMed]
53. Oemrawsingh PV, Mintz GS, Schalij MJ, Zwinderman AH, Jukema JW, Wall EE. Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves angiographic and clinical outcome of stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses: final results of a randomized comparison with angiographic guidance (TULIP Study) Circulation. 2003;107:62–67. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000043240.87526.3F. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Portegies MC, Schmitt R, Kraaij CJ, et al. Lack of negative inotropic effects of the new calcium antagonist Ro 40–5967 in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;18:746–751. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199111000-00013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Tops LF, Bax JJ, Zeppenfeld K, et al. Fusion of multislice computed tomography imaging with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:1076–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.07.019. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Morin R. Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005;21:165–176. doi: 10.1007/s10554-004-5338-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Rogalla P, Blobel J, Kandel S et al. (2010) Radiation dose optimisation in dynamic volume CT of the heart: tube current adaptation based on anterior-posterior chest diameter. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed]
58. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 2009;301:500–507. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.54. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Leschka S, Kim CH, Baumueller S, et al. Scan length adjustment of CT coronary angiography using the calcium scoring scan: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:W272–W277. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2970. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Labounty TM, Leipsic J, Min JK, et al. Effect of padding duration on radiation dose and image interpretation in prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:933–937. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3371. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Ayyad AE, Cole J, Syed A, et al. Temporal trends in utilization of cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2008.10.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Miller JA, Raichlin E, Williamson EE, et al. Evaluation of coronary CTA Appropriateness Criteria in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7:125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.08.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Springer Open Choice are provided here courtesy of Springer