Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of parasitvectBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleParasites & VectorsJournal Front Page
Parasit Vectors. 2010; 3: 101.
Published online 2010 November 3. doi:  10.1186/1756-3305-3-101
PMCID: PMC2989326

Bm86 midgut protein sequence variation in South Texas cattle fever ticks



Cattle fever ticks, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and R. (B.) annulatus, vector bovine and equine babesiosis, and have significantly expanded beyond the permanent quarantine zone established in South Texas. Currently, there are no vaccines approved for use within the United States for controlling these vectors. Vaccines developed in Australia and Cuba based on the midgut antigen Bm86 have variable efficacy against cattle fever ticks. A possible explanation for this variation in vaccine efficacy is amino acid sequence divergence between the recombinant Bm86 vaccine component and native Bm86 expressed in ticks from different geographical regions of the world.


There was 91.8% amino acid sequence identity in Bm86 among R. microplus and R. annulatus sequenced from South Texas infestations. When South Texas isolates were compared to the Australian Yeerongpilly and Cuban Camcord vaccine strains, there was 89.8% and 90.0% identity, respectively. Most of the sequence divergence was focused in one region of the protein, amino acids 206-298. Hydrophilicity profiles revealed that two short regions of Bm86 (amino acids 206-210 and 560-570) appear to be more hydrophilic in South Texas isolates compared to vaccine strains. Only one amino acid difference was found between South Texas and vaccine strains within two previously described B-cell epitopes. A total of 4 amino acid differences were observed within three peptides previously shown to induce protective immune responses in cattle.


Sequence differences between South Texas isolates and Yeerongpilly and Camcord strains are spread throughout the entire Bm86 sequence, suggesting that geographic variation does exist. Differences within previously described B-cell epitopes between South Texas isolates and vaccine strains are minimal; however, short regions of hydrophilic amino acids found unique to South Texas isolates suggest that additional unique surface exposed peptides could be targeted.


Vaccines that inhibit tick survival and impede transmission of the blood borne pathogens they vector are integral for improving both human and animal health. Vaccines against cattle fever ticks, the one host ticks that transmit bovine and equine babesiosis, are utilized in endemic countries such as Australia and Cuba [1]. These vaccines are not approved for use in the United States, and current eradication methods established by the United States Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program rely on acaricide treatment of infested cattle and equids [2]. Recently, temporary quarantine blanket areas have been implemented in areas previously known to be free of cattle fever ticks [2]. Obstacles to existing strategies designed to control cattle fever ticks in the U.S include the development of acaricide resistance, transport of ticks from infested to uninfested pastures by wildlife hosts, and maintenance of ticks on currently infested pastures by wildlife hosts [2,3]. Each of these factors has contributed to the expansion of temporary quarantine blanket areas outside of the permanent quarantine zone in South Texas, resulting in the urgent need to implement new effective strategies against cattle fever ticks on both cattle and white-tailed deer. One such method involves the development and testing of vaccine candidate antigens. Vaccination of susceptible mammalian hosts is one tool with the potential to substantially reduce pasture tick prevalence and decrease host exposure to ticks and the pathogens they transmit.

Commercially available vaccines against cattle fever ticks that are approved for use outside of the United States, including Gavac® (Heber Biotec; Havana, Cuba), TickGARD (Hoechst Animal Health; Australia), and TickGARDPLUS (Intervet Australia; Australia), are based on the recombinant form of the concealed midgut antigen, Bm86. The efficacy of Bm86 based vaccines against R. microplus and R. annulatus infestations is highly variable given the wide variety of experimental conditions and efficacy parameters under which they have been tested. Outside the U.S, vaccine efficacy following immunization with Bm86 and challenge with R. microplus has ranged from 0 to 91%, while efficacy against R. annulatus is reported to be above 99% [1,4-8]. A possible explanation for this variation in vaccine efficacy is divergence in amino acid sequence between the recombinant Bm86 in vaccines and Bm86 in ticks found in various geographical regions. Based on a calculation of mutation fixation index applied to a sequence fragment containing amino acids 539-573 of Bm86 from Australian, Mexican, Cuban, Venezuelan, and Argentine strains, Garcia-Garcia et al [9] suggested there was an inverse correlation between the vaccine efficacy and sequence variation within the Bm86 locus. Specifically, it was concluded that an amino acid sequence divergence of greater than 2.8% would result in a decrease in vaccine efficiency [9]. However, despite a high degree of sequence conservation in the Bm86 gene between sequenced R. microplus strains, vaccination with Gavac is not as effective against several Argentine and Mexican strains [6]. Other possible explanations for variation in vaccine efficacy related to the vector itself include differences in expression levels during targeted tick stages, existence of conformational epitopes not covered by antigen presentation in vaccine preparations, or differences in the quantity of blood and therefore anti-Bm86 antibody imbibed by various tick species [10].

Although antibody titer has been correlated with protection following vaccination with Bm86, little is known about specific protective epitopes, and the presence of sequence variation in these epitopes within a South Texas tick population. The objective of this research was to identify the presence or absence of Bm86 sequence variation found in larval progeny of R. microplus and R. annulatus obtained from cattle and white-tailed deer hosts within the permanent and blanket quarantine zones, as well as outbreak strains established in colony over several generations. Predicted B-cell epitopes and surface-exposed regions found within Bm86 sequences of South Texas isolates were then compared to those in isolates used to develop commercially available vaccines.

Results and Discussion

Sequence variation in the tick midgut surface protein Bm86 is one hypothesis for the variability in efficacy of Bm86 based vaccines against cattle fever ticks. In order to evaluate the potential use of a Bm86 based immunogen against cattle fever ticks in South Texas, the full length Bm86 coding region was sequenced from the larval stage of isolates recently obtained from within the both the permanent and temporary quarantine zones, so as to represent the current repertoire of Bm86 sequences existing in the field. Larval isolates from 27 different collections were selected for sequencing of the Bm86 coding sequence (Figure (Figure1;1; Table Table1).1). The number and location of isolates selected reflects the proportion of current outbreaks in their respective counties, as well as the number of female ticks submitted through the CFTEP that were available for oviposition. This number of isolates is also comparable to that used in previous descriptions of Bm86 geographic sequence variability [11]. The majority of documented infestations in South Texas are R. microplus, and this is reflected in the number of isolates sequenced: 24 R. microplus and 3 R. annulatus (Table (Table1).1). Twenty-two of 27 isolates sequenced were obtained from cattle hosts, reflecting the smaller number of opportunities to collect and evaluate ticks from white-tailed deer hosts.

Figure 1
Map of temporary blanket and permanent quarantine zones. Bm86 sequences obtained from larval colony or outbreak samples are represented by squares (R. annulatus, cattle host), circles (R. microplus, cattle host), or diamonds (deer hosts). The blanket ...
Table 1
Larval isolates utilized for Bm86 sequencing and resulting sequence groups.

Bm86 from 27 South Texas isolates separated into 12 distinct groups based on amino acid sequence identity (Figure (Figure2).2). The number of isolates per group varied between 1 and 9 (Table (Table2).2). Overall, there was 91.8% amino acid sequence identity in Bm86 among all of the isolates sequenced. Stronger similarities existed when comparing amino acid sequences within species, with 93.7% identity within all R. microplus isolates sequenced and 99.7% identity between the 3 R. annulatus isolates sequenced. Interestingly, 3 of the 5 Bm86 sequences obtained from larval strains that were maintained in colony over several generations, (Tables (Tables1,1, ,2)2) had 100% sequence identity to field collected isolates. This is consistent with the findings of Garcia-Garcia et al. (1999) where field derived strains from Argentina were identical to the Argentine laboratory reared strain A.

Figure 2
Amino acid alignment of Yeerongpilly (Australian strain), Cuban Camcord (Cuban strain used in Gavac vaccine). Linear B-cell epitopes previously identified by Odongo et al. are boxed; synthetic immunogenic peptides previously identified by Patarroyo et ...
Table 2
Identical Bm86 sequences grouped by county and isolate number.

Consistent with the Yeerongpilly Bm86 sequence [4], all South Texas Bm86 sequences were predicted to contain a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchoring signal sequence. In addition, epidermal growth factor repeats consisting of a 6 cysteine residue pattern have been previously described in the Yeerongpilly strain [4] and in various homologs of Bm86 [12]. There is one additional cysteine residue present in the signal peptide of South Texas isolates (residues 17) that is not present in the Yeerongpilly strain (the Camcord sequence in this region is not available in GenBank).

According to Garcia-Garcia et al. (1999), there is an inverse correlation between vaccine efficacy and sequence variation in Bm86, with variations of greater than 2.8% being the most likely to produce lower efficacy. Therefore, a comparison between Bm86 from South Texas isolates and Bm86 from vaccine strains was evaluated. In our comparisons, we utilized Bm86 from the Cuban Camcord strain of R. microplus, which is the component of commercially available Gavac [13], and the Australian Yeerongpilly strain of R. microplus [4]; GenBank Accession M29321.1), which is the component of commercially available TickGard and TickGARDPLUS . The level of sequence identity among all aligned South Texas R. microplus isolates (93.7%) is lower when compared to the identity between the Cuban Camcord and Australian Yeerongpilly strains (98.4%), suggesting that there is significantly greater diversity within the Bm86 gene in this South Texas population. An alignment of all full-length South Texas isolates was then compared to vaccine strains, revealing 89.8% and 90.0% amino acid sequence identity between Bm86 from South Texas isolates and the full-length Yeerongpilly and partial length Camcord strains, respectively. When R. annulatus isolates are removed from the comparison, there is 8.3% sequence variation between R. microplus isolates from South Texas and the Yeerongpilly strain. These percent differences are consistent with previously published data by Garcia-Garcia et al. (1999), where Yeerongpilly differed from Mexican and Argentine R. microplus field isolates by 5.7 - 8.6%.

Amino acid sequence variation from South Texas isolates was found throughout the entire length of Bm86, with a region of concentrated sequence variation spanning amino acids 206-298 (Figure (Figure2).2). Four peptides predicted to be antigenic in the Cuban Camcord strain by Canales et al [13] fall into this region. Three of these peptides had amino acid differences in South Texas isolates (between 2 and 6 differences are observed within a peptide) which in general contributed to a more hydrophobic nature in these specific regions (Figure (Figure2.)2.) However, the region of amino acids 206-210 of South Texas isolates was hydrophilic compared to the same region in Cuban Camcord and Yeerongpilly isolates (shaded in Figure Figure2).2). All R. annulatus and R. microplus isolates sequenced from South Texas have a lysine (K) in place of an isoleucine (I) at position 206) followed by an aspartic acid (D) (in both R. annulatus isolates and the R. microplus group 7 sequence) in place of an asparagine (N). Another region spanning amino acids 560-570 is also more hydrophilic in South Texas isolates when compared to the vaccine strains analyzed (Figure (Figure2).2). It is not known if these differences will affect the presentation of these epitopes to the immune system following vaccination with recombinant protein. It can be hypothesized, however, that a recombinant form of Bm86 reflecting amino acid differences apparent in South Texas isolates could elicit an immune response to a different repertoire of epitopes versus that elicited by those within vaccine strains.

Quantification of antibody titers against Bm86 has been the main method of measuring the bovine immune response following vaccination [8,14]. Antibody titers have been shown to correlate with protection, however, the epitopes found in Bm86 that induce protective immune responses in cattle are not extensively characterized. Linear B-cell epitopes previously identified by Odongo et al [15] and three synthetic peptides shown to elicit protective antibody responses characterized by Patarroyo et al [16] and Peconick et al. [17] are indicated in Figure Figure2.2. When compared to Yeerongpilly and Camcord, there was only one amino acid difference within the linear B-cell epitopes present in South Texas isolates, a lysine (L) in place of glutamic acid (E) at position 560. Peconick et al. [17] evaluated three immunogenic epitopes in the synthetic vaccine SBm7462 based on the Australian Yeerongpilly strain. There were 4 total amino acid differences observed within these three previously described peptides shown to induce protective immune responses in cattle. There are no differences within the first peptide. The second peptide, located at amino acids 132-145, contains a lysine (L) in all Texas isolates in place of a methionine (M) in vaccine strains, while there is a substitution of a tyrosine (T) in place of a histidine (H) in the R. microplus strains within the third peptide located at amino acids 398-411. R. annulatus sequences have two amino acid differences within this peptide, an asparagine (N) in place of a lysine (L) and threonine (T) in place of an alanine (A).

In the Cuban Camcord strain, Canales et al (2009) identified B-cell epitopes predicted based on physiochemical properties of amino acids such as hydrophilicity and presence in epitopes of other species, based on the method of Kolaskar and Tongaonkar [13,18]. These peptides are highlighted in grey in Figure Figure2.2. Several differences occur within these peptide sequences when comparing the Cuban Camcord strain with South Texas isolates, the majority of which are localized the region of amino acids 206-298. Differences in these predicted B-cell epitopes occur in both R. microplus and R. annulatus isolates. It is not known if these amino acid differences have any effect on antibody response following vaccination. However, the selection of epitopes that are specific to South Texas field collected ticks will be potentially useful in vaccine design. Because of the sequence diversity found within Bm86 from South Texas isolates, it is conceivable that a vaccine based on this antigen should contain several of the predicted variant epitopes in order to be effective.


Amino acid sequence variation among South Texas cattle fever tick isolates was apparent throughout the full length Bm86 protein but was concentrated in amino acids 206 - 298. Several variations within previously described predicted epitopes of vaccine strains have been identified. In vivo immunogenicity trials are necessary to further determine which epitopes relevant to South Texas isolates will be the most effective immunogens.

Materials and methods

Tick isolates

Adult female cattle fever ticks were obtained through the Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program established and maintained by USDA-APHIS-VS. Larval isolates were selected from outbreak submissions based on availability and preference was given to isolates obtained from counties with the highest proportion of current outbreaks (Starr and Zapata counties). Oviposition by female ticks occurred at the USDA-ARS Cattle Fever Tick Research Laboratory (CFTRL) in Mission, TX. The total number of females from which eggs were collected and pooled to produce larval progeny was recorded. Resulting larval progeny were either maintained in colony at the CFTRL (5 colony strains) or aliquots were frozen for RNA isolation (22 isolates). The outbreak isolates were collected between January 2009 and January 2010 from infested cattle or white-tailed deer.

Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

Approximately 100 larvae from each isolate were placed in RNA-later-ICE solution (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) and stored at -20C. Total RNA was isolated from larval samples following the protocols described in the ToTally RNA Kit™(Ambion). Following treatment with Turbo DNA-free™(Ambion), first-strand cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II™First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cDNA (1 μl) was subsequently used as template to amplify full length Bm86 (2023 bp) using primers designed to anneal to conserved regions: forward primer 5'ATGCGTGGCATCGCTTTGTT 3' and reverse primer 5'-GGTGTTCGATGTAAGCGTGATG-3'. PCR was performed using Platinum Taq (Invitrogen) under the following conditions: 94°C for 1:30, 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 2:00, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 4:30. Amplified products were gel-purified using QIAquick® Gel Extraction Kit and cloned using pCR®4-TOPO TA Cloning® Kit for Sequencing (Invitrogen). Clones were PCR screened using 5 Prime Hot Master Mix along with M13F and M13R primers and plasmid DNA's isolated using FastPlasmid® Mini Kit (5 Prime, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).

Bm86 sequencing and analysis

A minimum of five clones from each strain were sequenced using BigDye® Terminator version 3.1 chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Forward and reverse M13 sequencing primers were used in addition to the following five sequencing primers designed within the Bm86 gene to obtain double strand coverage of the full-length gene: Bm86for685, 5'- GACGAAAGAAGCTGGGTT-3';

Bm86rev605, 5'-CCAGGAGAGCAATAGGAGTC-3'; Bm86for1650, 5'- GTACCACATGCAACCCTAAA-3'; Bm86 internal reverse, 5'-TTTCTCTGCTATGAGTCTTGCC-3'

Bm86 internal forward, 5-'ATCGACAAAGCTGCTATTGTCC-3'. A nucleotide consensus sequences was obtained from each isolate and then translated using the translate tool on the ExPASy Proteomics server Amino acid sequences from each isolate were then aligned using ClustalW2 and grouped according to identity using Vector NTI Advance 11 (Invitrogen) and BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor version [19].

GPI anchor prediction was performed using the online GPI-anchor prediction program PredGPI The method of Hopp & Woods (using a window size of 5) was used to predict hydrophilic regions in BioEdit sequence alignment editor.

Nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper are available in the GenBank™ database under accession numbers HQ014385, HQ014386, HQ014387, HQ014388, HQ014389, HQ014390, HQ014391, HQ014392, HQ014393, HQ014394, HQ014395, HQ014396, HQ014397, HQ014398, HQ014399, HQ014400, and HQ014401.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JMF designed and performed molecular biology experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. RBD provided data on the isolates selected for sequencing. LSK advised on molecular biology and bioinformatics data analysis and interpretation. DK obtained coordinates for and generated the GIS map. PUO performed molecular biology experiments and advised on data interpretation. All authors reviewed the manuscript before submission.


The authors thank Deanna Bodine and Greta Buckmeier of the Knipling-Bushland U.S Livestock Insects Research Laboratory for their excellent technical assistance, and Jason Tidwell of the Cattle Fever Tick Research Laboratory CFTRL for assistance with organizing samples. We would also like to acknowledge the USDA/APHIS personnel involved in the Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program, especially Dr. Roberta Duhaime and the tick inspectors who collected the ticks used in this research. Thanks to Dr. Kevin Temeyer and Dr. Massaro Ueti for serving as peer reviewers for this manuscript. This research was funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-ARS CRIS project 6205-32000-031-00 D.

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this manuscript is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.


  • de la Fuente J, Almazan C, Canales M, Perez de la Lastra JMP, Kocan KM, Willadsen P. A ten-year review of commercial vaccine performance for control of tick infestations on cattle. Animal Health Research Reviews. 2007;8(1):23–28. doi: 10.1017/S1466252307001193. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pound JM, George JE, Kammlah DM, Lohmeyer KH, Davey RB. Evidence for role of white-tailed deer (Artiodactyla: Cervidae) in epizootiology of cattle ticks and southern cattle ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in reinfestations along the Texas/Mexico border in south Texas: a review and update. J Econ Entomol. 2010;103(2):211–218. doi: 10.1603/EC09359. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miller RJ, Davey RB, George JE. First report of organophosphate-resistant Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) within the United States. J Med Entomol. 2005;42(5):912–917. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0912:FROOBM]2.0.CO;2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rand KN, Moore T, Sriskantha A, Spring K, Tellam R, Willadsen P, Cobon GS. Cloning and expression of a protective antigen from the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:9657–9661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9657. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fragoso H, Hoshman Rad P, Ortiz M, Rodriguez M, Redondo M, Herrera L, de La Fuente J. Protection against Boophilus annulatus infestations in cattle vaccinated with the B. microplus Bm86-containing vaccine Gavac. Vaccine. 1998;16:1990–1992. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00116-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • de la Fuente J, Rodriguez M, Garcia-garcia JC. Immunological control of ticks through vaccination with Boophilus microplus gut antigens. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000;916:617–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05347.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • De Vos S, Zeinstra L, Taoufik O, Willadsen P, Jongejan F. Evidence for the utility of the Bm86 antigen from Boophilus microplus in vaccination against other tick species. Exp Appl Acarol. 2001;25(3):245–261. doi: 10.1023/A:1010609007009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Andreotti R. Performance of two Bm86 antigen vaccine formulations against ticks using crossbreed bovines in a stall test. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2006;15:97–100. [PubMed]
  • Garcia-Garcia JC, Gonzalez IL, Gonzalez DM, Valdes M, Mendez L, Lamberti J, D'Agostino B, Citroni D, Fragoso H, Ortiz M, Rodriguez M, De La Fuente J. Sequence variations in the Boophilus microplus Bm86 locus and implications for immunoprotection in cattle vaccinated with this antigen. Exp Appl Acarol. 1999;23:883–895. doi: 10.1023/A:1006270615158. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nijhof AM, Balk JA, Postigo M, Jongejan F. Selection of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR studies in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks and determination of the expression profile of Bm86. BMC Mol Biol. 2009;10(1):112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-10-112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sossai S, Peconick AP, Sales-Junior PA, Marcelino FC, Vargas MI, Neves ES, Patarroyo JH. Polymorphism of the bm86 gene in South American strains of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. Exp Appl Acarol. 2005;37:199–214. doi: 10.1007/s10493-005-3262-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nijhof AM, Postigo M, Rhebergen AM, Taoufik A, Jongejan F. Bm86 homologues and novel ATAQ proteins with multiple Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF)-like domains from hard and soft ticks. Int J Parasitol. 2010. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Canales M, Almazan C, Naranjo V, Jongejan F, de la Fuente J. Vaccination with recombinant Boophilus annulatus Bm86 ortholog protein, Ba86, protects cattle against B. annulatus and B. microplus infestations. BMC Biotechnology. 2009;9:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-9-29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pipano E, Alekceev E, Galker F, Fish L, Samish M, Shkap V. Immunity against Boophilus annulatus induced by the Bm86 (Tick-Gard) vaccine. Exp Appl Acarol. 2003;29:141–149. doi: 10.1023/A:1024246903197. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Odongo D, Kamau L, Skilton R, Mwaura S, Nitsch C, Musoke A, Taracha E, Daubenberger C, Bishop R. Vaccination of cattle with TickGARD induces cross-reactive antibodies binding to conserved linear peptides of Bm86 homologues in Boophilus decoloratus. Vaccine. 2007;25:1287–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.09.085. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Patarroyo JH, Portela RW, De Castro RO, Couto Pimente J, Guzman F, Patarroyo ME, Vargas MI, Prates AA, Dias Mendes MA. Immunization of cattle with synthetic peptides derived from the Boophilus microplus gut protein (Bm86) Vet Immunol Immunopath. 2002;88:163–172. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2427(02)00154-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Peconick AP, Sossai S, Girao FA, Rodrigues MQRB, Souza e Silva CH, Guzman Q, Patarroyo VAM, Vargas MI, Pattarroyo JH. Synthetic vaccine (SBm7462) against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: Preservation of immunogenic determinants in different strains from South America. Exp Parasit. 2008;119:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.12.007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kolaskar AS, Tongaonkar PC. A semi-empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. FEBS Lett. 1990;276:172–174. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80535-Q. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–98.

Articles from Parasites & Vectors are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central