PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Circ J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 19.
Published in final edited form as:
Published online 2010 January 18.
PMCID: PMC2988430
NIHMSID: NIHMS250603

Cardiac Progenitor Cells and Bone Marrow-Derived Very Small Embryonic-Like Stem Cells for Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI) continues to be the most prevalent cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although pharmaceutical agents and interventional strategies have contributed greatly to therapy, new and superior treatment modalities are urgently needed given the overall disease burden. Stem cell-based therapy is potentially a promising strategy to lead to cardiac repair after MI. An array of cell types has been explored in this respect, including skeletal myoblasts, bone marrow (BM)-derived stem cells, embryonic stem cells, and more recently, cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs). Recently studies have obtained evidence that transplantation of CPCs or BM-derived very small embryonic-like stem cells can improve cardiac function and alleviate cardiac remodeling, supporting the potential therapeutic utility of these cells for cardiac repair. This report summarizes the current data from those studies and discusses the potential implication of these cells in developing clinically-relevant stem cell-based therapeutic strategies for cardiac regeneration.

Keywords: Cardiac function, Cells, Ischemic heart disease, Myocardial infarction, Reperfusion

Myocardial infarction (MI) results in loss of cardiomyocytes, scar formation, ventricular remodeling, and eventually heart failure. Pharmacologic, catheter-based, and surgical interventions have led to improved survival of patients with coronary artery disease, although they fail to regenerate dead myocardium. Consequently, reduced mortality is accompanied by increased morbidity because of ischemic heart failure. In recent years, stem cell-based therapy has emerged as a potential new strategy for cardiac repair.1 The ultimate goals of cell-based therapy are cardiomyocyte regeneration and coronary neovascularization, leading to clinical improvement without severe adverse effects. The optimal source of cells for repairing damaged myocardium is a topic of intense research. Important features of stem cells for cardiac regeneration include self renewal, clonogenicity, and the ability to differentiate into cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells.

Studies in animal models of MI have demonstrated that various subsets of adult primitive cells can regenerate functional cardiomyocytes, with improvement in cardiac structure and function. Small clinical trials of adult bone marrow (BM)-derived stem cell therapy in patients with MI and ischemic cardiomyopathy have recapitulated these beneficial effects in humans, with infarct size reduction and improved cardiac function. BM cells, as well as subpopulations from within the BM, including hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs, primarily a blood-forming cell), multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs, potential cardiomyogenic and angiogenic cell) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs, primarily an angiogenic cell), have been the most prevalent source of cells used in experimental and clinical studies. These subpopulations are sorted according to their expression of membrane receptor proteins, the so-called cell-surface markers. Entire BM cell populations can be incubated with antibodies directed against cell-surface markers and attached to either magnetic beads or fluorescent tags. Magnetic column or flow cytometry is then used to isolate the cells of interest from the entire population. In this fashion, particular characteristic HSCs, MSCs and EPCs can be isolated from the BM. MSCs have also been separated from the entire unfractionaled population of BM by their ability to adhere to plastic substrates and by the absence of hematopoietic markers.2 However, a principal problem is that the cell-surface markers that determine a true cardiac stem cell have not yet been defined. As a result, there is a vast number of possible combinations of the various markers and cell subpopulations to be studied. Not surprisingly, the outcomes of therapy have been variable because the subpopulations yielded from laboratory to laboratory have not been standardized.

Over the past 10 years, researchers have applied various BM-derived stem/progenitor cells for cardiac reparative therapy in animal studies, such as lineage negative (linneg) c-kit positive (c-kitpos) BM stem cells,35 BM-derived MSCs,67 and EPCs.8,9 Despite these studies39 showing the transdifferentiation of BM-derived stem/progenitor cells into functional cardiomyocytes and vascular cells, other studies have suggested that the transplanted BM stem cells do not readily acquire a cardiac phenotype in the injured heart.1012 Thus, promoting adequate transdifferentiation of the transplanted BM-derived stem/progenitor cells into functional cardiomyocytes and vascular cells remains a great challenge for researchers to use these cells in cardiac reparative therapy.

Apart from the studies using these typical BM-derived stem/progenitor cells for cardiac reparative therapy, a pool of resident cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) has been discovered in the adult heart itself.13,14 More recently, a novel population of very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) has also been identified in the BM.15 Transplantation of these CPCs and VSELs has been shown to induce effective cardiac repair after MI. This review will discuss the recent data from our studies dealing with CPCs and VSELs for cardiac reparative therapy.

Myocardial Repair With CPCs

Discovery of Resident CPCs

Traditionally, the heart has been viewed as a static organ incapable of repairing any form of damage. According to this paradigm, the number of myocytes is established at birth, and this population of terminally differentiated myocytes is irreplaceable throughout the life of the organ and the organism.1621 In agreement with this notion of the heart, myocytes are permanently lost, and the heart has no reserve mechanism to compensates for cell death and the wear and tear resulting from the physiological demands of daily life. However, demonstration that small amplifying myocytes can divide after infarction22 or pressure overload,23,24 and that a responsive stem cell pool resides in the adult myocardium,25,26 has opened an innovative view of the heart as a dynamic organ capable of self-renewing. In 2003, Beltrami et al reported a population of resident CPCs in the adult rat heart that were identified by their expression of the surface antigen and stem cell marker (c-kitpos) and by the absence of surface markers of more committed hematopoietic lineages (linneg).13 These linneg/c-kitpos CPCs are multipotent undifferentiated and give rise to myocytes, smooth muscle, and endothelial cells.13 Although rare overall, histological analysis revealed the CPCs reside in small clusters within cardiac niches.14 CPC clusters and cardiac niches exist in both the atria and ventricles. These cells can be isolated, cultured, and cloned, and expanded in vitro for therapeutic implication in vivo. The existence of CPCs that amplify and commit to the myocyte lineage in response to increased workload strongly supports the notion of potential cardiac regeneration. Unlike other adult stem cells, CPCs represent a logical source to exploit in cardiac regenerative therapy, because they are likely to be intrinsically programmed to generate cardiac tissue and to increase cardiac tissue viability. Given that CPCs have these unique characteristics, the identification of resident CPCs has created great excitement and sparked intense hope for myocardial regeneration with cells that are from the heart itself and are thereby inherently programmed to reconstitute cardiac tissue.

In Vivo Evidence of Cardiac Repair With CPCs

Myocardial repair requires the formation of myocytes and coronary vessels, and it cannot be accomplished by a cell already committed to the myocyte lineage. In the presence of an infarct, the generation of myocytes alone cannot restore contractile performance in the akinetic region; myocytes will not grow or survive in the absence of vessel formation. Resistance arterioles are critical for blood supply, and oxygen delivery is controlled by the capillary network. Similarly, the creation of vessels alone would not restore the dead myocardium or reinstitute contractile activity in the infarcted portion of the ventricular wall; vessels do not produce force.

Observation that CPCs injected locally in the infarcted myocardium of animals repair the necrotic tissue and improve ventricular function13,27 has formed the basis of a new paradigm in which multipotent CPCs are implicated in the normal turnover of myocytes, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts.

However, the field of regenerative cardiology is in its infancy, and great caution has to be exercised in the implementation of this form of cellular therapy in humans before we have obtained the basic information concerning the ability of CPCs to migrate, divide, and differentiate. Unfortunately, there is not a good animal model that can be used to collect the information that is of tremendous importance in the application of CPC treatment to the patient population. In an attempt to develop strategies relevant to the future treatment of patients, new hypotheses have to be raised and various in vivo animal models have to be tested to move the field in a direction that defines CPC therapy clinically on an individual basis. This would maximize the efficacy of CPC administration in ischemic heart disease.

The first in vivo study of CPCs for cardiac repair was reported by Beltrami et al13 in a rat model of MI. In that study, female Fischer 344 rats were subjected to the left coronary artery permanent ligation (non-reperfused MI) and 5 h later, BrdU-labeled linneg/c-kitpos CPCs prepared from syngeneic male rats were injected with 2×105 cells in 2 opposite regions bordering the infarct. BrdU-labeled regenerating myocardium was found in infarcts both at 10 and 20 days. The regenerating band was thin and incompletely covered the infarcted area at 10 days, but was thicker and present throughout the infarct at 20 days. This regeneration had significantly reduced infarct size from 53% to 40% in the 10-day group, and from 70% to 48% in the 20-day group. The regenerated myocardium was constituted by BrdU-positive small myocytes, capillaries, and arterioles that appeared to mature over time. The myocytes expressed cardiac myosin heavy chain, α-sarcomeric actin, α-cardiac actinin, N-cadherin, and connexin 43. Cardiac regeneration increased wall thickness and ejection fraction, and improved LV end-diastolic pressure, developed pressure and dP/dt at 20 days. That study demonstrated for the first time that injection of linneg/c-kitpos CPCs into the border region of infarcted myocardium regenerates cardiac tissue and positively affects cardiac performance.

In a follow-up study, Rota et al confirmed that intramyocardial injection of CPCs led to the replacement of approximately 42% of the scar with newly formed myocardium, attenuated ventricular dilation and prevented the chronic decline in function of the infarcted heart.28 Subsequently, Bearzi et al reported that injection of human CPCs into the border zone of the infarcted myocardium of immunodeficient mice and immunosuppressed rats generated a chimeric heart that contained human myocardium composed of myocytes, coronary resistance arterioles, and capillaries.27 The regenerated human myocardium was structurally and functionally integrated with the rodent myocardium and contributed to the performance of the infarcted heart. Those in vivo studies13,27,28 have clearly shown that CPCs are effective in myogenesis when administered intramyocardially. However, delivery of CPCs through direct intramyocardial injection is an approach that would be impractical for widespread use in patients.

Because intracoronary delivery via a percutaneous procedure is a more clinically-relevant approach and the most widely used route for clinical studies of cell-based therapy in patients, we sought to validate the protective properties of the CPCs after delivered intracoronarily. With regard to the intracoronary approach, other adult stem cells, such as MSCs2931 and cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs),32 have been shown to produce microvascular occlusion after intracoronary delivery and raised concern over the use of this approach to deliver stem cells into the diseased myocardium. This is not surprising, as the diameter of MSCs and CDCs is >20 µm, exceeding the typical capillary luminal diameter of 7–10 µm.33 In contrast, CPCs are <10 µm, which is not larger than the capillary luminal diameter, providing an unique advantage over the other adult stem cells for intracoronary delivery. Furthermore, the study was performed in the setting of a permanent coronary occlusion, which differs importantly from the contemporary clinical situation in which the occluded artery is usually recanalized.34 Thus, we performed studies to examine CPC-mediated cardiac repair in more clinically relevant settings, in which MI was created after ischemia and reperfusion and CPCs were delivered via the intracoronary route. In an acute MI setting,35 rats were subjected to a 90-min coronary occlusion and received EGFP-labeled clonogenic CPCs intracoronarily at 4 h after reperfusion. CPCs were delivered to the coronary arteries at a dose of 1×106 cells/rat via a catheter positioned in the aortic root during two 20-s occlusions of the ascending aorta. At 35 days after CPC delivery, immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopic images of the treated hearts showed that the transplanted EGFPpos cells were mainly engrafted in the infarcted region, although scarce numbers of EGFPpos cells were found in the surviving noninfarcted LV myocardium (Figure 1). EGFPpos CPC-derived new cells were characterized by the expression of α-sarcomeric actin, GATA-4, MEF2C, connexin 43 and N-cadherin (Figure 1), suggesting that the transplanted CPCs differentiated toward cardiac lineages and induced myocardial regeneration. Echocardiographic analysis showed that CPCs prevented further decline of fractional shortening, LV ejection fraction, LV anterior wall thickness and attenuated the increase in LV dimension, area and volume (Figure 2), suggesting an improvement in LV systolic performance. Pathologic analysis showed that treated hearts had a smaller LV chamber diameter and volume, and a higher wall thickness-to-chamber radius ratio and LV mass-to-chamber volume ratio (Figure 3). In addition, CPC treatment decreased the infarct size by 29%. That study demonstrates that CPCs are effective in limiting infarct size, attenuating LV remodeling, and ameliorating LV function after acute MI when delivered intracoronarily.

Figure 1
Administration of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) promotes myocardial regeneration in rats after myocardial infarction. (A) Large transverse section halfway between the base and the apex of the left ventricle, showing an infarct in a CPC-treated rat. ...
Figure 2
Administration of cardiac stem cells improves left ventricular (LV) systolic function in rats after myocardial infarction: echocardiographic measurements in untreated and treated animals. *P<0.05 between untreated and treated rats. Data are mean±SEM. ...
Figure 3
Administration of cardiac progenitor cells improves postinfarction ventricular remodeling in rats after myocardial infarction: multiple anatomical parameters obtained in hearts arrested in diastole. *P<0.05 between untreated and treated rats. ...

Clinically, however, this approach would be problematic because administration of autologous CPCs to patients with acute MI would necessitate an endomyocardial biopsy followed by isolation and expansion of c-kitpos CPCs from the tissue fragment, all of which would require weeks, so CPC transplantation would have to be postponed until after the acute phase of the infarct. By the time a sufficient number of autologous CPCs would be ready for therapeutic use, the inflammatory response to acute injury would have abated and a scar would have formed. At this chronic stage, the local myocardial environment is very different from that of an acute MI because the expression of the cytokines and adhesion molecules that are upregulated during the acute phase and play an important role in the chemotaxis, homing, and differentiation of stem cells3639 is absent or markedly diminished. For example, CPCs are known to express CXCR-4, the receptor for stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1),35 a cytokine that plays a pivotal role in orchestrating the chemotaxis, homing, and differentiation of various progenitor/stem cells.36,38,39 The expression of SDF-1 in the myocardium increases markedly after ischemia/reperfusion, peaking at 1 day, but resolving by 7 days.36,38,39 The migration, survival, and differentiation of CPCs are also modulated by hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1),13,28,40,41 both of which are upregulated shortly after ischemia/reperfusion and then subsequently decline.42,43 In view of the marked downregulation of SDF-1, HGF, IGF-1, and other signals in the setting of a mature scar, it is unclear whether transplanting CPCs at this stage would still be effective.

To address this issue, we performed another study44 to determine whether administration of CPCs is effective in regenerating cardiac tissue and alleviating postinfarction LV remodeling and dysfunction when these cells are infused intracoronarily in the setting of an old MI (scar) produced by temporary coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion. Rats were subjected to a 120-min coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion. At 1 month after coronary occlusion/reperfusion, at a time when the acute inflammatory response has resolved and the formation of the scar is complete, rats received vehicle or EGFP-labeled c-kitpos CPCs intracoronarily at a dose of 1×106 cells/rat via a catheter positioned in the aortic root; 35 days later, morphometric analysis revealed that the amount of viable myocardium within the risk region was 25% greater (P<0.01) and the thickness of the anterior (infarcted) wall 24% greater (P<0.05) in CPC-treated than in vehicle-treated rats (Figure 4). Cardiac function assessed by both echocardiography (Figure 5A) and hemodynamics (Figure 5B) showed significant improvement at 35 days in the CPC-treated rats compared with the vehicle group. Correlation analysis revealed that the hemodynamic parameters were significantly related to the amount of viable myocardium in the risk region (Figure 6), suggesting that the functional improvement noted in CPC-treated rats was accounted for, in part, by the greater proportion of viable tissue in the risk region. In addition, CPC treatment reduced the myocardial collagen content in both the infarcted and noninfarcted regions (Figure 7), suggesting less fibrosis in the CPC-treated myocardium. Taken together, these results demonstrate that intracoronary administration of CPCs in the setting of a myocardial scar produces beneficial structural and functional effects within a relatively short timeframe (35 days). To delineate the possible role of cardiac regeneration from transplanted EGFPpos CPCs in these beneficial effects, we performed a comprehensive pathologic analysis of 28–40 sections per heart to quantitate the newly formed EGFPpos myocardial cells. Although previous studies of CPCs in models of acute MI13,27,28,35 have shown robust engraftment and differentiation of the transplanted cells, surprisingly, we were unable to find any EGFPpos cells in 10 of 17 CPC-treated hearts. In the remaining 7 hearts, EGFPpos cells accounted for only ~2.6% of the risk region and ~1.1% of the noninfarcted region, values that were insufficient to account for the functional improvement. Importantly, in the CPC-treated group, the increase in viable tissue within the infarcted region and the improvement in systolic LV performance were observed not only in the subset of 7 hearts that had EGFPpos cells expressing cardiomyocyte, endothelial, and vascular smooth muscle cell markers, but also in the subset of 10 heart in which EGFPpos cells were not found. Taken together, these findings suggest that although transplanted CPCs gave rise to new cells expressing markers specific for cardiac myocytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells, direct formation of new parenchyma from the transplanted CPCs was not the major reason for the benefits observed, suggesting that paracrine mechanisms45 are likely to play an important role. Indeed, we found that infusion of exogenous CPCs promoted proliferation of endogenous cells, including endogenous c-kitpos CPCs, in both the risk and nonninfarcted regions (Figure 8), and the increase in the number of endogenous CPCs was also associated with an increase in the number of endogenous CPCs that exhibited apparent cardiogenic commitment in both regions (Figure 9). These findings suggest that exogenous CPCs promote proliferation of endogenous CPCs, resulting in formation of new cardiac cells, and support the concept that one such paracrine mechanism is activation of endogenous CPCs.

Figure 4
Morphometric analysis in rats after myocardial infarction. (A) Representative Masson's trichrome-stained myocardial sections from a vehicle-treated and a CPC-treated rat. Scar tissue and viable myocardium are blue and red, respectively. (B) Quantitative ...
Figure 5
Cardiac function assessed by echocardiography and hemodynamics in rats after myocardial infarction (MI). (A) Quantitative echocardiographic parameters including systolic thickness of the anterior (infarcted) wall, thickening fraction in the anterior (infarcted) ...
Figure 6
Correlation between the amount of viable myocardium in the risk region and hemodynamic variables, including left ventricular (LV) pressure, dP/dt, ejection fraction, end-systolic elastance, preload-adjusted maximal power, and preload recruitable stroke ...
Figure 7
Myocardial collagen content in rats after myocardial infarction. Representative microscopic images of a normal, vehicle-treated, and cardiac progenitor cell (CPC)-treated heart obtained using (A) regular and (B) polarized light. (C) Collagen content expressed ...
Figure 8
Effect of cardiac progenitor cell (CPC) transplantation on c-kitpos cells in rats after myocardial infarction. (A) Representative confocal microscopic images from a vehicle- treated and a CPC-treated rat showing c-kitpos cells (red) and BrdUpos cells ...
Figure 9
Cardiac commitment of endogenous cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) after trasplantation of exogenous CPCs in rats after myocardial infarction. The commitment of endogenous CPCs (c-kitpos/EGFPneg cells) to the cardiac lineage was assessed by quantitating ...

Taken together, our studies using rats with acute35 or chronic MI44 have demonstrated that intracoronary administration of exogenous CPCs produces beneficial structural and functional effects and activates endogenous CPCs. Although exogenous CPCs can differentiate into new cardiac cells, this mechanism is not sufficient to explain the benefits, suggesting paracrine effects, among which our data identify activation of endogenous CPCs.

Myocardial Repair With VSELs

More recently, a novel population of very rare (~0.01%) Sca-1pos/Linneg/CD45neg cells has been identified from adult BM mononuclear cells15 and human cord blood.46 These cells are very small (<6 µm),47 and express (among other lineage markers) cardiac markers, including Nkx2.5/Csx, GATA-4, and MEF2C. Previous studies have shown that VSELs can differentiate in vitro into several lineages, including cardiac and vascular lineages,15,48 and are mobilized into the peripheral blood after acute MI.49 To test therapeutic potential of VSELs, we performed an in vivo study to examine whether BM-derived VSELs promote myocardial repair after a reperfused MI.50 Mice underwent a 30-min coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion and received an intramyocardial injection of 1×104 Sca-1pos/Linneg/CD45neg EGFP-labeled VSELs at 48 h after MI. A total of 5 injections were made in the peri-infarct region in a circular pattern at the border between infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium. To separate cell-specific from nonspecific actions. Sca-1pos/Linneg/CD45neg VSELs were directly compared with Sca-1pos/Linneg/CD45pos cells, which are highly enriched among HSCs and differ from VSELs only with respect to CD45 expression.

At 35 days after MI, VSEL-treated mice exhibited improved global and regional LV systolic function (Figure 10), cessation of LV remodeling (Figure 11) and attenuated myocyte hypertrophy in surviving tissue Figure 12) compared with vehicle-treated controls. In contrast, transplantation of Sca-1pos/Linneg/CD45pos cells failed to confer any functional or structural benefits. Scattered EGFPpos myocytes and capillaries were present in the infarct region in VSEL-treated mice, but their numbers were very small. These results, indicate that transplantation of a relatively small number of CD45neg VSELs is sufficient to improve LV function and alleviate myocyte hypertrophy after MI, supporting their potential therapeutic utility for cardiac repair. The ability of VSELs to alleviate postinfarction LV remodeling warrants further investigation of their therapeutic utility and may have significant implications for the design of future studies of BMC-mediated cardiac repair both in animals and in humans.

Figure 10
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in mice after myocardial infarction. Representative two-dimensional (A,C,E) and M-mode (B,D,F) images from vehicle-treated (A,B), CD45+ cell-treated (C,D), and very small embryonic-like stem ...
Figure 11
Morphometric assessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling in mice after myocardial infarction. Representative Masson's trichrome-stained myocardial sections from Vehicle-treated (A), CD45+ hematopoietic stem cell-treated (B), and very small embryonic-like ...
Figure 12
Assessment of cardiomyocyte and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in mice after myocardial infarction. (AC) Representative images of cardiomyocytes in the viable myocardium from Masson's trichrome-stained vehicle-treated (A), CD45+ hematopoietic ...

Conclusion

Cell-based therapy for acute and chronic ischemic heart disease is an exciting new approach that is in the early stages of development. Development of this therapy has proceeded in an orderly and rigorous fashion, with appropriate parallel conduct of clinical trials and mechanistic research. As is the case with all therapies at an early stage, complete consensus in clinical trials does not exist. The totality of evidence supports the safety and provisional efficacy of cell-based therapies. Future challenges include optimizing the cell type and delivery method. The potential impact of cell-based therapy could revolutionize cardiovascular medicine. This review has provided proof of concept that administration of a relatively small number of CPCs or BM-derived VSELs is sufficient to attenuate deterioration of LV function and structure in animals after MI. The mechanism remains uncertain, but cannot consist solely of regeneration of transplanted cell-derived cardiomyocytes. The evidence that transplantation of exogenous CPCs promotes activation of endogenous CPCs supports the concept of possible paracrine effects. Because the small cell diameter of CPCs (<10 µm) and VSELs (<6 µm) is unlikely to cause micro vascular occlusion, these cells appear to be suitable for intracoronary delivery, which is the most clinically relevant route for cell-based cardiac reparative therapy. It seems plausible that the next decade will witness a large number of innovative and exciting clinical trials utilizing CPC or VSEL-based approaches for reparative therapy of ischemic heart disease.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH Grants R01-HL-74351, HL-68088, HL-70897, HL-76794, HL-78825, HL-55757, and HL-91202.

References

1. Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM, Schneider MD. Unchain my heart: The scientific foundations of cardiac repair. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:572–583. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science. 1997;276:71–74. [PubMed]
3. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, Li B, et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001;410:701–705. [PubMed]
4. Kajstura J, Rota M, Whang B, Cascapera S, Hosoda T, Bearzi C, et al. Bone marrow cells differentiate in cardiac cell lineages after infarction independently of cell fusion. Circ Res. 2005;96:127–137. [PubMed]
5. Rota M, Kajstura J, Hosoda T, Bearzi C, Vitale S, Esposito G, et al. Bone marrow cells adopt the cardiomyogenic fate in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:17783–17788. [PubMed]
6. Min JY, Sullivan MF, Yang Y, Zhang JP, Converso KL, Morgan JP, et al. Significant improvement of heart function by cotransplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells and fetal cardiomyocytes in postinfarcted pigs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1568–1575. [PubMed]
7. Amado LC, Saliaris AP, Schuleri KH, St John M, Xie JS, Cattaneo S, et al. Cardiac repair with intramyocardial injection of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:11474–11479. [PubMed]
8. Cho HJ, Lee N, Lee JY, Choi YJ, Ii M, Wecker A, et al. Role of host tissues for sustained humoral effects after endothelial progenitor cell transplantation into the ischemic heart. J Exp Med. 2007;204:3257–3269. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Schuh A, Liehn EA, Sasse A, Hristov M, Sobota R, Kelm M, et al. Transplantation of endothelial progenitor cells improves neovascularization and left ventricular function after myocardial infarction in a rat model. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008;103:69–77. [PubMed]
10. Balsam LB, Wagers AJ, Christensen JL, Kofidis T, Weissman IL, Robbins RC. Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature. 2004;428:668–673. [PubMed]
11. Murry CE, Soonpaa MH, Reinecke H, Nakajima H, Nakajima HO, Rubart M, et al. Haematopoietic stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiac myocytes in myocardial infarcts. Nature. 2004;428:664–668. [PubMed]
12. Nygren JM, Jovinge S, Breitbach M, Sawen P, Roll W, Hescheler J, et al. Bone marrow-derived hematopoietic cells generate cardiomyocytes at a low frequency through cell fusion, but not transdifferentiation. Nat Med. 2004;10:494–501. [PubMed]
13. Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, et al. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;114:763–776. [PubMed]
14. Urbanek K, Cesselli D, Rota M, Nascimbene A, De Angelis A, Hosoda T, et al. Stem cell niches in the adult mouse heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9226–9231. [PubMed]
15. Kucia M, Reca R, Campbell FR, Zuba-Surma E, Majka M, Ratajczak J, et al. A population of very small embryonic-like (VSEL) CXCR4(+)SSEA-1(+)Oct-4+ stem cells identified in adult bone marrow. Leukemia. 2006;20:857–869. [PubMed]
16. Agah R, Kirshenbaum LA, Abdellatif M, Truong LD, Chakraborty S, Michael LH, et al. Adenoviral delivery of E2F-1 directs cell cycle reentry and p53-independent apoptosis in postmitotic adult myocardium in vivo. J Clin invest. 1997;100:2722–2728. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Chien KR, Olson EN. Converging pathways and principles in heart development and disease: CV@CSH. Cell. 2002;110:153–162. [PubMed]
18. MacLellan WR, Schneider MD. Genetic dissection of cardiac growth control pathways. Annu Rev Physiol. 2000;62:289–319. [PubMed]
19. Nakamura T, Schneider MD. The way to a human's heart is through the stomach: Visceral endoderm-like cells drive human embryonic stem cells to a cardiac fate. Circulation. 2003;107:2638–2639. [PubMed]
20. Oh H, Bradfute SB, Gallardo TD, Nakamura T, Gaussin V, Mishina Y, et al. Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: Homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:12313–12318. [PubMed]
21. Olson EN, Schneider MD. Sizing up the heart: Development redux in disease. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1937–1956. [PubMed]
22. Kajstura J, Leri A, Finato N, Di Loreto C, Beltrami CA, Anversa P. Myocyte proliferation in end-stage cardiac failure in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:8801–8805. [PubMed]
23. Urbanek K, Quaini F, Tasca G, Torella D, Castaldo C, Nadal-Ginard B, et al. Intense myocyte formation from cardiac stem cells in human cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10440–10445. [PubMed]
24. Anversa P, Palackal T, Sonnenblick EH, Olivetti G, Capasso JM. Hypertensive cardiomyopathy: Myocyte nuclei hyperplasia in the mammalian rat heart. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:994–997. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Beltrami AP, Urbanek K, Kajstura J, Yan SM, Finato N, Bussani R, et al. Evidence that human cardiac myocytes divide after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1750–1757. [PubMed]
26. Hierlihy AM, Seale P, Lobe CG, Rudnicki MA, Megeney LA. The post-natal heart contains a myocardial stem cell population. FEBS Lett. 2002;530:239–243. [PubMed]
27. Bearzi C, Rota M, Hosoda T, Tillmanns J, Nascimbene A, De Angelis A, et al. Human cardiac stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:14068–14073. [PubMed]
28. Rota M, Padin-Iruegas ME, Misao Y, De Angelis A, Maestroni S, Ferreira-Martins J, et al. Local activation or implantation of cardiac progenitor cells rescues scarred infarcted myocardium improving cardiac function. Circ Res. 2008;103:107–116. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Freyman T, Polin G, Osman H, Crary J, Lu M, Cheng L, et al. A quantitative, randomized study evaluating three methods of mesenchymal stem cell delivery following myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1114–1122. [PubMed]
30. Perin KC, Silva GV, Assad JA, Vela D, Buja LM, Sousa AL, et al. Comparison of intracoronary and transendocardial delivery of allogeneic mesenchymal cells in a canine model of acute myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;44:486–495. [PubMed]
31. Vulliet PR, Greeley M, Halloran SM, MacDonald KA, Kittleson MD. Intra-coronary arterial injection of mesenchymal stromal cells and microinfarction in dogs. Lancet. 2004;363:783–784. [PubMed]
32. Johnston PV, Sasano T, Mills K, Evers R, Lee ST, Smith RR, et al. Engraftment, differentiation, and functional benefits of autologous cardiosphere-derived cells in porcine ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2009;120:1075–1083. 1077 following 1083. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Kassab GS, Fung YC. Topology and dimensions of pig coronary capillary network. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H319–H325. [PubMed]
34. King SB, 3rd, Smith SC, Jr, Hirshfeld JW, Jr, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. Circulation. 2008;117:261–295. [PubMed]
35. Dawn B, Stein AB, Urbanek K, Rota M, Whang B, Rastaldo R, et al. Cardiac stem cells delivered intravascularly traverse the vessel barrier, regenerate infarcted myocardium, and improve cardiac function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:3766–3771. [PubMed]
36. Askari AT, Unzek S, Popovic ZB, Goldman CK, Forudi K, Kiedrowski M, et al. Effect of stromal-cell-derived factor 1 on stem-cell homing and tissue regeneration in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2003;362:697–703. [PubMed]
37. Yamaguchi J, Kusano KF, Masuo O, Kawamoto A, Silver M, Murasawa S, et al. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 effects on ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cell recruitment for ischemic neovascularization. Circulation. 2003;107:1322–1328. [PubMed]
38. Abbott JD, Huang V, Liu D, Hickey R, Krause DS, Giordano FJ. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 alpha plays a critical role in stem cell recruitment to the heart after myocardial infarction but is not sufficient to induce homing in the absence of injury. Circulation. 2004;110:3300–3305. [PubMed]
39. Zhang M, Mal N, Kiedrowski M, Chacko M, Askari AT, Popovic ZB, et al. SDF-1 expression by mesenchymal stem cells results in trophic support of cardiac myocytes after myocardial infarction. FASEB J. 2007;21:3197–3207. [PubMed]
40. Linke A, Muller P, Nurzynska D, Casarsa C, Torella D, Nascimbene A, et al. Stem cells in the dog heart are self-renewing, clonogenic, and multipotent and regenerate infarcted myocardium, improving cardiac function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:8966–8971. [PubMed]
41. Urbanek K, Torella D, Sheikh F, De Angelis A, Nurzynska D, Silvestri F, et al. Myocardial regeneration by activation of multipotent cardiac stem cells in ischemic heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:8692–8697. [PubMed]
42. Cheng W, Reiss K, Li P, Chun MJ, Kajstura J, Olivetti G, et al. Aging does not affect the activation of the myocyte insulin-like growth factor-1 autocrine system after infarction and ventricular failure in Fischer 344 rats. Circ Res. 1996;78:536–546. [PubMed]
43. Ono K, Matsumori A, Shioi T, Furukawa Y, Sasayama S. Enhanced expression of hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met by myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in a rat model. Circulation. 1997;95:2552–2558. [PubMed]
44. Tang XL, Rokosh DG, Sanganalmath SK, Yuan F, Sato H, Mu J, et al. Intracoronary administration of cardiac progenitor cells alleviates ventricular dysfunction in rats with a 30-day old infarction. Circulation. 2009 [in press]. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Gnecchi M, Zhang Z, Ni A, Dzau VJ. Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy. Circ Res. 2008;103:1204–1219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Kucia M, Halasa M, Wysoczynski M, Baskiewicz-Masiuk M, Moldenhawer S, Zuba-Surma E, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of novel population of CXCR4+ SSEA-4+ Oct-4+ very small embryonic-like cells purified from human cord blood: Preliminary report. Leukemia. 2007;21:297–303. [PubMed]
47. Zuba-Surma EK, Kucia M, Abdel-Latif A, Dawn B, Hall B, Singh R, et al. Morphological characterization of very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) by ImageStream system analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:292–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Zuba-Surma EK, Abdel-Latif A, Kucia M, Hunt G, Ratajczak MZ, Bolli R, et al. Effects of culture conditions on cardiomyogenic differentiation and expansion of bone marrow derived myocardial tissue-committed stem cells (abstract) Circulation. 2006;114 II-212.
49. Zuba-Surma EK, Kucia M, Dawn B, Guo Y, Ratajczak MZ, Bolli R. Bone marrow-derived pluripotent very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) are mobilized after acute myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;44:865–873. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Dawn B, Tiwari S, Kucia MJ, Zuba-Surma EK, Guo Y, Sanganalmath SK, et al. Transplantation of bone marrow-derived very small embryonic-like stem cells attenuates left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling after myocardial infarction. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1646–1655. [PMC free article] [PubMed]