PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Org Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 18.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2987273
NIHMSID: NIHMS248703

N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Initiated α-Acylvinyl Anion Reactivity: Additions of α-Hydroxypropargylsilanes to Aldehydes

Abstract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms248703u1.jpg

Highly substituted α,β-unsaturated ketones are prepared by the N-heterocyclic carbene-initiated addition of α-hydroxypropargylsilanes to aldehydes. This strategy serves as a highly efficient alternative to the standard Morita–Baylis–Hillman (MBH) approaches for these types of compounds. In contrast to the MBH reaction, different substitution in the β-position of the product (R1) can be accommodated in moderate to excellent yields with a high degree of control over the resulting alkene.

The Morita–Baylis–Hillman (MBH) reaction is an efficient reaction that generates highly functionalized compounds by employing α-acylvinyl anion reactivity.1 Significant advances in the MBH reaction have been made recently, including mechanistic studies as well as asymmetric and intramolecular variants.2,3 Despite this progress, the intermolecular MBH reaction has intrinsic limitations. In particular, the β-substituents of the activated alkene starting materials (e.g., ethyl acrylate, vinyl ketones) are almost always hydrogen atoms. Recently, we reported the scandium(III)-catalyzed addition of silyloxyallenes to aldehydes as a valuable alternative to the MBH and other α-acylvinyl anion processes (Option I, Figure 1).46 These reactions proceed under very mild conditions (10 mol % Sc(OTf)3) and accommodate a wide scope of β-substitution with excellent yields and a high degree of control over the resulting alkene geometry. Also, enantioenriched products could be synthesized by the (–)-(salen)Cr(III)-catalyzed additon of racemic silyloxyallenes.4 One aspect of the transformation is the prerequisite of preparing the silyloxyallenes in a separate step through the Kuwajima–Reich rearrangement of the α-hydroxypropargylsilane precursors.7 Herein, we present an alternative single-flask approach starting directly from the propargylsilanes, thus further enhancing the applicability of this unconventional α-acylvinyl addition reaction (Option II, Figure 1).

Figure 1
Silyloxyallene addition strategies.

Our current interests include the development of reactions employing Lewis base activation to efficiently access unconventional reactivity. Several transformations from our laboratory, including acyl anion additions, homoenolate reactions, alkyne additions, disilylations of activated alkenes, and hydroacylations of ketones have been facilitated by the use of Lewis bases.8 Given our strong interest in the combination of Lewis basic promoters/catalysts, we reasoned that Lewis bases may activate silyloxyallenes toward addition. In particular, they should be more compatible with the rearrangement conditions (substoichiometric n-BuLi, THF) of the α-hydroxypropargylsilanes to the allenes and facilitate a single flask procedure.

Starting with α-hydroxypropargylsilane 1 in THF at 0 °C, the allene was formed with use of 5 mol % of n-BuLi. The resulting solution was then cooled to −78 °C and followed by addition of benzaldehyde and a substoichiometric amount of Lewis base. At the onset of these studies, we performed a limited survey of nucleophilic species. For example, fluoride sources (20 mol % tetrabutylammonium difluorotriphenylsilicate, 27% yield) and potassium tert-butoxide (20 mol %, 20% yield) generated the desired product, but both these classes of anions afforded poor yields with virtually no catalyst turnover.9 While a potential solution to increase the yields of this reaction was simply to add more fluoride or potassium alkoxide, we were compelled to identify a promoter that could be effective in amounts less than 1 equiv. We reasoned that the cations associated with the fluoride or alkoxides might be complicating the desired transformation and looked to find zwitterionic nucleophilic molecules that would avoid these possibilities. Gratifyingly, 20 mol % of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) 2 catalyzes the addition to benzaldehyde in an 80% yield and 1:20 E:Z ratio for the new alkene (Scheme 1).10,11

Scheme 1
NHC-Initiated Addition of α-Hydroxypropargylsilane

N-Heterocyclic carbenes have become increasingly powerful in synthesis not only as ligands but also as reagents and catalysts for several bond-forming transformations, including benzoin condensations, Stetter reactions, homoenolate additions, transesterifications, and acylations.12,13 The use of an NHC to activate silicon reagents has only been observed recently.14 Song and co-workers were the first to demonstrate that N-heterocyclic carbenes effectively catalyze the addition of TMSCF3 as well as TMSCN to carbonyl compounds in high yields and with very low catalyst loadings.15 This reactivity has also been reported with the NHC-catalyzed ring-opening of aziridines with silylated nucleophiles.16 Most recently, Song and his colleagues have extended their research to include carbene-catalyzed additions of silyl enol ethers in Mukaiyama aldol reactions.17

With the optimized bond-forming conditions in hand for this process, we set out to investigate the scope of the reaction using 1 as the nucleophilic precursor (Table 1). Addition occurred readily to aromatic aldehydes (entries 1–4) in good yields. The α-hydroxypropargylsilane 1 also added to aliphatic aldehydes (entries 5 and 6) albeit in lower yields. For all of the aldehydes, the E/Z selectivity of the reaction was greater than 1:20 favoring the Z isomer.

Table 1
Addition of α-Hydroxypropargylsilane 1 to Aldehydes

An advantage of this reaction over the standard MBH approaches is the tolerance of β-substitution of the alkene on the product (Table 2). A wide range of α-hydroxypropargylsilanes are tolerated including both alkyl (entry 1) and aromatic (entry 2) substituted substrates. A trimethylsilyl (entry 3), silyl protected alcohol (entry 4), and tert-butyl (entry 5) group can also be accommodated. Moderate to excellent yields were achieved as well as excellent E:Z regiocontrol.

Table 2
Addition of a-Hydroxypropargylsilanes to Benzadehyde

The role of the N-heterocyclic carbene in this reaction is currently under investigation: two reaction pathways can be envisaged (Scheme 2). The first possibility is that the N-heterocyclic carbene acts in a catalytic capacity. In their recent report, Song and co-workers invoke initial NHC addition to the TMS enol ether, which subsequently activates the silyloxy species to form a pentavalent silicon complex analogous to other Lewis base-catalyzed Mukaiyama aldol reactions.18 Support for this pathway includes the known interaction of TMSI as well as polychlorosilanes with N-heterocyclic carbenes to form stable adducts.19 However, these experiments by Kuhn involved less sterically encumbered carbenes than 2.

Scheme 2
Proposed Mechanisms

A second possible mode of reactivity is an NHC-initiated reaction in which the N-heterocyclic carbene interacts with the aldehyde and not the silyloxy compound. A clear possibility based on the known interactions of N-heterocyclic carbenes with aldehydes13 is the initial addition of the nucleophilic NHC 2 to the aldehyde to form an alkoxide intermediate 14 devoid of an external cation, which can then proceed to desilylate the silyloxyallene 1 via silyl transfer.20 This highly reactive “naked” allenolate would react readily with a second equivalent of aldehyde to form the desired carbinol product (Figure 1). A similar model has been proposed previously by both Aoyama et al. and Suzuki et al. with cyanosilylations of carbonyl compounds.15

We lend support for the latter NHC-initiated mechanism with the isolation and X-ray structure of the N-heterocyclic carbene–aldehyde adduct (Figure 2). In an effort to elucidate the role of the N-heterocyclic carbene in our reaction, benzaldehyde (1 equiv), chlorodimethylphenylsilane (1 equiv), and 2 (1 equiv) were combined in THF at −78 °C. After warming, the removal of the solvent under reduced pressure and recrystallization of the resulting solid produced the NHC–aldehyde adduct as a single product with chloride as the counterion to the positively charged heterocycle (H14·Cl, Figure 2). The NHC–Si adduct was not detected or recovered under the reaction conditions. This ORTEP provides for the first time definitive, structural evidence for the widely invoked addition of carbenes to aldehydes. Initial experiments to determine if this adduct is a catalyst in the reaction were inconclusive most likely due to the potential reversibility of the addition. We believe this adduct to be the more likely intermediate in the addition of silyloxyallenes and aldehydes “catalyzed” by N-heterocyclic carbenes. We reason that the aldehyde carbonyl carbon is significantly more accessible to the NHC 2 than the silicon atom of the silyloxyallene. An examination of space-filling depictions of tetrasubstituted silyl species and a large, sterically encumbered N-heterocyclic carbene such as 2 make a direct interaction between the C2 carbon of the carbene and the silicon atom highly tenuous.

Figure 2
ORTEP of NHC–aldehyde Adduct H14·Cl.21

In summary, we have developed a highly efficient single-flask procedure for the addition of α-hydroxypropargylsilanes to aldehydes. The reaction generates β-substituted unsaturated ketone products in moderate to excellent yields with exquisite control of the alkene geometry. The reaction pathway of this process currently invokes the initial formation of a nucleophilic alkoxide resulting from the addition of a free N-heterocyclic carbene to an aldehyde. This alkoxide promotes a silyl group transfer to generate a reactive allenolate. Structural evidence supporting the NHC–aldehyde adduct as the initiator of the reaction has been reported. Further investigations of the synthetic utility of silyloxyallenes and this unique mode of silicon activation reported herein are currently underway.

Supplementary Material

Org. Lett. Supplemental Information

Acknowledgments

Support for this research has been provided by the NIH (National Institute of General Medical Sciences RO1 GM073072). K.A.S. thanks Abbott, Amgen, Boerhinger-Ingelheim, and 3M for generous unrestricted research support. FMCLithium, BASF, and Wacker Chemical kindly provided reagents for these studies. Funding for the NU Analytical Services Laboratory has been furnished in part by the NSF (CHE-9871268).

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and spectral data for all new compounds, and a CIF file for H14·Cl. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

1. For a review of the MBH reaction, see: Basavaiah, D., Rao, A. J., Satyanarayana, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811–891. For mechanistic studies, see: (a) Aggarwal VK, Fulford SY, Lloyd-Jones GC. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2005;44:1706–1708. [PubMed] (b) Price KE, Broadwater SJ, Walker BJ, McQuade DT. J Org Chem. 2005;70:3980–3987. [PubMed] (c) Krafft ME, Haxell TFN, Seibert KA, Abboud KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:4174–4175. [PubMed]
2. Selected examples of enantioselective MBH: (a) Brzezinski LJ, Rafel S, Leahy JW. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:4317–4318. (b) Iwabuchi Y, Nakatani M, Yokoyama N, Hatakeyama S. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:10219–10220. (c) McDougal NT, Schaus SE. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:12094–12095. [PubMed]
3. (a) Wang LC, Luis AL, Agaplou K, Jang HJ, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:2402–2403. [PubMed] (b) Frank SA, Mergott DJ, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:2404–2405. [PubMed] (c) Krafft ME, Haxell TFN. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:10168–10169. [PubMed]
4. Reynolds TE, Bharadwaj AR, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15382–15383. [PubMed]
5. For reports of silyloxyallenes, see: (a) Merault G, Bourgeoi P, Dunogues J, Duffaut N. J Organomet Chem. 1974;76:17–27. (b) Fleming I, Perry DA. Tetrahedron. 1981;37:4027–4034. (c) Kato M, Kuwajima I. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1984;57:827–830. (d) Reich HJ, Eisenhart EK, Olson RE, Kelly MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:7791–7800. [PubMed] (e) Stergiades IA, Tius MA. J Org Chem. 1999;64:7547–7551. (f) Li G, Wei HX, Phelps BS, Purkiss DW, Kim SH. Org Lett. 2001;3:823–826. [PubMed] (g) Yoshizawa K, Shioiri T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:757–761.
6. For alternative approaches to α-acylvinyl anion equivalents, see: (a) Sato Y, Takeuchi S. Synthesis. 1983:734–735. (b) Marino JP, Linderman RJ. J Org Chem. 1983;48:4621–4628. (c) Tsuda T, Yoshida T, Saegusa T. J Org Chem. 1988;53:1037–1040. (d) Ramachandran PV, Rudd MT, Burghardt TE, Reddy MVR. J Org Chem. 2003;68:9310–9316. [PubMed] (e) Gudimalla N, Frohlich R, Hoppe D. Org Lett. 2004;6:4005–4008. [PubMed] (f) Xue S, He L, Han KZ, Liu YK, Guo QX. Synlett. 2005:1247–1250. (g) Trost BM, Oi S. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:1230–1231. [PubMed] (h) Trost BM, Chung CK. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:10358–10359. [PubMed]
7. (a) Kuwajima I, Kato M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980;21:623–626. (b) Reich HJ, Olson RE, Clark MC. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102:1423–1424.
8. Acyl anion additions: (a) Mattson AE, Bharadwaj AR, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:2314–2315. [PubMed] (b) Myers MC, Bharadwaj AR, Milgram BC, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:14675–14680. [PubMed] (c) Mattson AE, Zuhl AM, Reynolds TE, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:4932–4933. [PubMed]Homoenolate addition: (d) Chan A, Scheidt KA. Org Lett. 2005;7:905–908. [PubMed]Trialkoxysilylalkyne addition: (e) Lettan RB, Scheidt KA. Org Lett. 2005;7:3227–3230. [PubMed]Disilylation: (f) Clark CT, Lake JF, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:84–85. [PubMed]Hydroacylation: (g) Chan A, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:4558–4559. [PubMed]
9. Pilcher AS, Deshong P. J Org Chem. 1996;61:6901–6905. [PubMed]
10. Arduengo AJ, III, Krafczyk R, Schmutzler R, Craig HA, Goerlich JR, Marshall WJ, Unverzagt M. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:14523–14534.
11. Attempts at using a single base to catalyze both the rearrangement as well as the addition provided low yields of desired product.
12. For reviews of N-heterocyclic carbenes as ligands, see: (a) Herrmann WA, Ofele K, Von Preysing D, Schneider SK. J Organomet Chem. 2003;687:229–248. (b) Herrmann WA. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:1291. [PubMed]
13. For reviews of N-heterocyclic carbenes as catalysts, see: (a) Enders D, Balensiefer T. Acc Chem Res. 2004;37:534–541. [PubMed] (b) Nair V, Bindu S, Sreekumar V. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:5130–5135. [PubMed] (c) Johnson JS. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:1326–1328. [PubMed]
14. (a) Song JJ, Tan ZL, Reeves JT, Gallou F, Yee NK, Senanayake CH. Org Lett. 2005;7:2193–2196. [PubMed] (b) Song JJ, Gallou F, Reeves JT, Tan ZL, Yee NK, Senanayake CH. J Org Chem. 2006;71:1273–1276. [PubMed]
15. Other NHC-catalyzed cyanation reactions: (a) Fukuda Y, Maeda Y, Ishii S, Kondo K, Aoyama T. Synthesis. 2006:589–590. (b) Fukuda Y, Maeda Y, Kondo K, Aoyama T. Chem Pharm Bull. 2006;54:397–398. [PubMed] (c) Fukuda Y, Maeda Y, Kondo K, Aoyama T. Synthesis. 2006. pp. 1937–1939. (d) Fukuda Y, Kondo K, Aoyama T. Synthesis. 2006:2649–2652. (e) Suzuki Y, Abu Bakar MD, Muramatsu K, Sato M. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:4227–4231. (f) Kano T, Sasaki K, Konishi T, Mii H, Maruoka K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:4615–4618.
16. (a) Wu J, Sun X, Ye S, Sun W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:4813–4816. (b) Sun X, Ye S, Wu J. Eur J Org Chem. 2006:4797–4798.
17. Song JJ, Tan ZL, Reeves JT, Yee NK, Senanayake CH. Org Lett. 2007;9:1013–1016. [PubMed]
18. See ref 17. For a recent review of the Mukaiyama aldol reaction see: Mukaiyama T. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:5590. [PubMed]
19. Kuhn N, Kratz T, Blaser D, Boese R. Chem Ber. 1995;128:245–250.
20. (a) Noyori R, Nishida I, Sakata J, Nishizawa M. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102:1223. (b) Noyori R, Nishida I, Sakata J. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105:1598. (c) Nakamura E, Shimizu M, Kuwajima I, Sakata J, Yokoyama K, Noyori R. J Org Chem. 1983;48:932.
21. Solvent, hydrogen atoms (including OH) were removed from ORTEP for clarity. X-ray data for 14: C36H45Cl5N2O, MW = 698.99, T = 153(2) K, λ = 0.71073 Å, monoclinic space group, P2(1)/c, a = 10.0917(8) Å, b = 15.981(12) Å, c = 23.623(18) Å, β = 95.076(1)°, V = 3794.8(5) Å3, Z = 4, Dc = 1.223 g/cm3, μ = 0.411 mm−1, F(000) = 415, crystal size 0.30 × 0.29 × 0.28 mm3, independent reflections 9255 [R(int) = 0.0930], reflections collected 35196, refinement method was full-matrix least-squares on F2, goodness-of-fit on F2 was 0.976, final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0906, wR2 = 0.2519, R indices (all data) R1 = 0.1274, wR2 = 0.2519, largest diff. peak and hole 2.047 and −1.193 e Å−3. See the Supporting Information for additional details.