In a cohort of 283 mentally retarded patients with likely X-linked mode of inheritance, we identified three duplications in Xq28, which all included the
MECP2 gene. This indicates that the
MECP2 duplication incidence could be as high as 1% in this group of patients. Moreover, we identified three duplications in 134 male patients with mental retardation and severe, mostly progressive, neurological symptoms, indicating that the mutation frequency could be as high as 2% in male patients with severe encephalopathy. In the cohort of 329 female patients with features suggestive of Rett syndrome, no
MECP2 duplications were identified. In addition, the female relatives from the affected male patients who carried a Xq28 duplication were all healthy. It thus appears that
MECP2 duplications do not lead to mental retardation in women. This is likely caused by skewing of X-inactivation, which has invariably been observed in women with a
MECP2 duplication until now.
2, 4, 5, 6The duplications range from approximately 100–900

kb in size and all include at least the
MECP2 and the
IRAK1 genes. The overall severity of the phenotype does not seem to correlate with the size of the duplication (). The phenotype of patients from family C with the smallest duplication is as severe as that of the other patients. Yet, the phenotype of patients of family F, who had the largest duplication, was the most severe. One of the patients from the latter family died at the age of 10. Besides
MECP2, there are four other genes duplicated in one or more families that are already involved in a specific phenotype. Loss-of function mutations in
SLC6A8 cause the creatine deficiency syndrome (OMIM 300352), which is characterized by MR, epilepsy, and expressive speech and language delay.
11 SLC6A8 is duplicated in family D and F. In patients from these two families, creatine levels in urine and spinal fluid were normal. In addition, the phenotype does not seem to be different as compared with the other patients, although brachycephaly was only noted in patients from these two families. However, brachycephaly is a common consequence of hypotonia and is not always present in patients with a
SLC6A8 duplication.
4 Loss-of-function mutations in
L1CAM result in hydrocephalus, MASA syndrome (mental retardation, aphasia, shuffling gait, and adducted thumbs), and spastic paraplegia.
12 Except for mental retardation, the characteristics of patients with
L1CAM loss-of-function mutations were not present in any of the patients with a duplication of
L1CAM. In addition,
L1CAM is not X-inactivated,
13 which indicates that this gene is probably not dosage sensitive.
FLNA gain-of-function mutations cause otopalatodigital syndrome I (OMIM 311300) or II (OMIM 304120), frontometaphyseal dysplasia (OMIM 305620), or Melnick–Needles syndrome (OMIM 309350).
14 The symptoms between patients with
MECP2 duplications and these four syndromes do not overlap, except for the presence of mental retardation. This shows that duplications of
FLNA do not have the same effect as the gain-of-function mutations. Of note,
FLNA is X-inactivated,
13 which indicates that the expression of this gene is dosage sensitive.
FLNA loss-of-function mutations cause periventricular heterotopia (OMIM 300049),
15 a cerebral cortical neuron migration disorder that results primarily in seizures that do not respond to treatment.
16 However, drug-resistant epilepsy was not restricted to patients from family B and F, who have a
FLNA duplication, which indicates that it is unlikely that duplication of solely
FLNA is causing the epilepsy.
GDI1 loss-of-function mutations cause non-specific XLMR
17 and
GDI is X-inactivated.
13 Moreover, duplications of
GDI1 alone result in moderate MR and microcephaly.
18 GDI1 is duplicated only in family F. Interestingly, this is the family with the severest phenotype and the only one in which microcephaly is described in one of the two patients. Including the two patients from family F, five out of the eight patients with Xq28 duplication of whom the duplication is described in sufficient detail to be sure that
GDI1 is included, have microcephaly.
2, 4, 7, 10 This supports a correlation between
GDI1 duplications and microcephaly. Moreover, the reversed correlation, that is, patients with microcephaly have a
GDI1 duplication, is true in five out of the six cases.
| Table 2Clinical description of the MR patients with a MECP2 duplication |
The main consistent clinical features in patients with a
MECP2 duplication are severe mental retardation, infantile hypotonia, progressive spasticity, seizures, absent speech and recurrent infections.
2 In the current study, all 13 affected males had infantile hypotonia and moderate to severe mental retardation. In addition, ataxia or an ataxic gait was described in almost all our patients, while it was not recognized as a symptom of the
MECP2 duplication phenotype before. In two patients pyramidal signs were present, but these developed rather late and were definitely not present at the onset of the disease. Seizures were observed in 54% of the patients. Remarkably, the epilepsy was drug resistant in families A, B and C, which was also noted in several previously reported male patients with a
MECP2 duplication.
5, 6 In family A, epilepsy was also observed in unaffected family members, although the severity of the seizures was significantly milder in the unaffected individuals as compared with the male patients carrying
MECP2 duplications. The prevalence of infections in our patients is 23%, which is much lower in comparison to the 80% described in previously published work (). This indicates that patients with Xq28 duplications that include
MECP2 and
IRAK1 might be less prone to infections than thought earlier. On the other hand, it is also possible that infections during infancy are not always reported. Previously, microcephaly was reported in 36% of the patients with a
MECP2 duplication, whereas in our study only one patient had microcephaly. Moreover, two male patients from the same family presented with macrocephaly. Del Gaudio
et al4 described also one patient with macrocephaly, but his phenotype cannot be compared to that of our two patients, because he had three copies of
MECP2. Our data suggests that microcephaly is not a consistent feature of patients with
MECP2 duplications. Cerebral atrophy is common in our patients and present in six out of the eight tested patients. This could be a result of epilepsy,
19 but only four of the examined patients had both epilepsy and cerebral atrophy, which suggests that these symptoms are not related
a priori. Based on the available MRI data, we could not determine a more specific cerebral phenotype, but it would be interesting to delineate such a correlation in an additional study. In our study, distinct facial features such as large ears and broad nasal root are frequently observed in patients, which suggests that there might also be a specific facial appearance associated with
MECP2 duplications. Combining all data, severe mental retardation and infantile hypotonia are the two core features of patients with duplications of
MECP2. Absence of speech, seizures, progressive spasticity, recurrent infections, and possibly ataxia present in various combinations, further define the clinical phenotype.
At present, 37 families have been reported with duplications in the Xq28 region including
MECP2.
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 In addition, genomic segments proximal to the
MECP2 gene have been duplicated either to or from the autosomes 2, 10, 16 and 22.
20, 21 Examination of the Xq28 duplication end points in 16 families did not provide any indication of a common mechanism for these genomic rearrangements.
22 Non-allelic homologues recombination was not involved in any of these duplications, although eight of the 32 break points coincided with low-copy repeats. Nevertheless, the presence of numerous repeats in the Xq28 region could induce genomic instability. In one patient, non-homologues end joining was demonstrated.
22 For two other patients, a two-step mechanism was suggested in which a part of Xq28 is inserted near
MECP2, which is subsequently followed by breakage-induced replication with strand invasion of the normal sister chromatid resulting in a duplication of
MECP2 and a second telomeric duplication. Taken together, these data indicate that there are multiple mechanisms by which copy number changes can occur in Xq28, showing that this is a fragile genomic region in general.
Our results underline the importance of screening for
MECP2 gene duplications in male patients with moderate to severe mental retardation. In , the recently published data on the number of duplications found in different groups of patients are summarized. Patients selected for the specific
MECP2 duplication phenotype result in a mutation detection rate as high as 17%.
2 As our study shows, in male patients with severe encephalopathy, the mutation frequency is still more than 2%. In male patients referred for
MECP2 mutation analysis in regular DNA diagnostics, this is 1.6%.
4 This group of patients will overlap for a large part with our patients as male patients referred for
MECP2 mutation analysis usually have (progressive) neurological symptoms as well. Even in a group of male and female patients with a phenotype that is suspect for a chromosomal rearrangement,
MECP2 duplications were identified in 0.36% of the cases.
4 Analysis of MR patients with linkage to Xq28, regardless of the specific phenotype, showed that the incidence is 11%
5 and here we show that analysis of patients with XLMR without a specific linkage interval still results in a detection frequency of 1% for
MECP2 duplications. The mutation frequency of
MECP2 duplications is among the highest of the known X-linked mental retardation genes.
23 Therefore, we propose to implement DNA copy number testing for the
MECP2 gene in the current diagnostic testing in all male patients with moderate to severe mental retardation accompanied by (progressive) neurological symptoms.
| Table 3Incidence of MECP2 duplications in males with MR selected by different criteria |