PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of actaeInternational Union of Crystallographysearchopen accessarticle submissionjournal home pagethis article
 
Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online. 2010 March 1; 66(Pt 3): o524.
Published online 2010 February 6. doi:  10.1107/S160053681000396X
PMCID: PMC2983752

Guanidinium 4-amino­benzoate

Abstract

In the title compound, CH6N3 +·C7H6NO2 , the cation and anion lie on crystallographic mirror planes. The 4-amino­benzoate anion is almost in a planar conformation with a maximum deviation of 0.024 (2) Å for the N atom. The bond length in the deprotonated carboxyl group is inter­mediate between those of normal single and double Csp2=O bonds, indicating delocalization of the charge over both O atoms of the COO group. In the crystal, N—H(...)O hydrogen bonds assemble the ions in layers propagating in the bc plane. This structure is very similar to that of guanidinium benzoate.

Related literature

For a related structure, see: Pereira Silva et al. (2007 [triangle]). 4-Amino­benzoic acid has two known polymorphs, see: Gracin & Rasmuson (2004 [triangle]). For the potential applications of guanidine compounds in non-linear optics, see: Zyss et al. (1993 [triangle]). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 [triangle]).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is e-66-0o524-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • CH6N3 +·C7H6NO2
  • M r = 196.22
  • Orthorhombic, An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is e-66-0o524-efi1.jpg
  • a = 14.9833 (4) Å
  • b = 8.0602 (2) Å
  • c = 8.4737 (2) Å
  • V = 1023.36 (4) Å3
  • Z = 4
  • Mo Kα radiation
  • μ = 0.10 mm−1
  • T = 293 K
  • 0.33 × 0.19 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer
  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003 [triangle]) T min = 0.898, T max = 0.986
  • 19879 measured reflections
  • 1323 independent reflections
  • 960 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
  • R int = 0.026

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037
  • wR(F 2) = 0.109
  • S = 1.04
  • 1323 reflections
  • 85 parameters
  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
  • Δρmax = 0.13 e Å−3
  • Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003 [triangle]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003 [triangle]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 [triangle]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 [triangle]); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 [triangle]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681000396X/ds2019sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681000396X/ds2019Isup2.hkl

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), under scholarship SFRH/BD/38387/2008 and project PTDC/FIS/103587/2008.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Guanidine is a strong Lewis base and the guanidinium cation may be easly anchored onto numerous inorganic and organic anions and polyanions, largely because of the presence of six potential donor sites for hydrogen-bonding interactions. From the point of view of their physical properties, guanidine compounds are potentially interesting for non-linear optics applications since guanidinium, a polarizable acentric two-dimensional cation, can be regarded as a planar octupolar chemical entity (Zyss et al., 1993). We are currently engaged in a research project aimed at investigating the structures, and the dielectric and optical properties of guanidine and guanidine derivative compounds.

4-Aminobenzoic acid has two known polymorphs (Gracin & Rasmuson, 2004) and is one of the most versatile acids for structure extension by linear hydrogen-bonding associations, through both the carboxylic acid and the amine functional groups.

Both ions of the title compound, (I), Fig. 1, possess mirror symmetry, with the C6 and N2 atoms of the cation situated in the mirror plane as well as the carboxylate group C atom, the ipso-C and the para-C and N atoms of the anion.

The 4-aminobenzoate anion is almost in a planar conformation, with the atoms N4 and C5 displaced from the ring plane by about the same amounts, 0.024 (2) and 0.022 (2)Å respectively, and in the same direction.

The dihedral angle between the phenyl ring and the carboxylate group [1.58 (16)°] is slightly larger than the corresponding angle in guanidinium benzoate [0.41 (18)°].

The O—C—O angle of the carboxylate group is greater than 120° because of the steric effect of lone-pair electrons on both O atoms. The bond length in the deprotonated carboxyl group is intermediate between the single Csp2—O (1.308-1.320 Å) and double Csp2═O bond lengths (1.214-1.224 Å, Allen et al., 1987), indicating delocalization of the charge over both O atoms of the COO- group.

The three C—N bond lengths in the propeller-shaped (CH6N3)+ cation are similar (Table 1), the symmetry of the cation being C3 h. The usual model of electron delocalization in this species, leading to a C—N bond order of 1.33, is applicable here.

All H atoms on the guanidinium cation are involved in N—H···O interactions with the anion (Fig. 2, Table 2) forming infinite layers propagating in the bc plane, each carboxylate O atom accepting three hydrogens. In each layer the cation is bonded to three anions, two approximately perpendicular and one approximately coplanar (Fig. 3). This pattern is also found in guanidinium benzoate (Pereira Silva et al., 2007).

Experimental

The title compound was prepared by adding 4-aminobenzoic acid (Aldrich, 99%, 1.0 mmol) to guanidinium carbonate (Aldrich 99%, 0.5 mmol) in a water solution (100 ml). The solution was slowly warmed to the boiling point and then left to evaporate under ambient conditions. After 2 weeks, small light brown single crystals were obtained.

Refinement

All H atoms were located in a difference Fourier synthesis. The guanidinium H-atom coordinates were refined, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N). The H atoms of the anion were placed in calculated positions and refined as riding on their parent atoms, using SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) defaults [C—H = 0.93 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C)].

Figures

Fig. 1.
A plot of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (a);(b) x, 1/2-y, z]
Fig. 2.
A packing diagram for (I), viewed down the b axis, showing the layer formation. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
Fig. 3.
A packing diagram for (I), viewed down the c axis, with the hydrogen bonds depicted by dashed lines.

Crystal data

CH6N3+·C7H6NO2F(000) = 416
Mr = 196.22Dx = 1.274 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2nCell parameters from 8009 reflections
a = 14.9833 (4) Åθ = 2.8–27.5°
b = 8.0602 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 8.4737 (2) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1023.36 (4) Å3Irregular edge, light brown
Z = 40.33 × 0.19 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX2 CCD area-detector diffractometer1323 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube960 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.026
[var phi] and ω scansθmax = 28.1°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)h = −18→19
Tmin = 0.898, Tmax = 0.986k = −10→9
19879 measured reflectionsl = −10→11

Refinement

Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.109H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.051P)2 + 0.1635P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1323 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
85 parametersΔρmax = 0.13 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.34385 (6)0.11290 (10)−0.04842 (10)0.0519 (3)
C10.43652 (10)0.25000.13590 (17)0.0390 (4)
C20.46854 (8)0.10235 (14)0.19926 (13)0.0462 (3)
H20.44900.00190.15770.055*
C30.52869 (8)0.10183 (16)0.32253 (14)0.0542 (3)
H30.54910.00150.36300.065*
C40.55904 (11)0.25000.3867 (2)0.0556 (5)
C50.37086 (10)0.25000.00390 (17)0.0391 (4)
N40.61881 (15)0.25000.5120 (3)0.0886 (7)
H40.6353 (13)0.149 (3)0.543 (2)0.106*
N10.25025 (7)0.10833 (13)0.66469 (14)0.0551 (3)
H1A0.2845 (9)0.1093 (16)0.7576 (18)0.066*
H1B0.2285 (9)0.016 (2)0.6258 (17)0.066*
N20.17018 (11)0.25000.47745 (19)0.0563 (4)
H2A0.1493 (9)0.147 (2)0.4470 (16)0.068*
C60.22330 (11)0.25000.6031 (2)0.0426 (4)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0705 (6)0.0334 (4)0.0519 (5)−0.0031 (4)−0.0139 (4)−0.0006 (3)
C10.0415 (8)0.0398 (8)0.0358 (7)0.0000.0050 (6)0.000
C20.0489 (6)0.0455 (6)0.0442 (6)0.0021 (5)0.0014 (5)0.0013 (5)
C30.0530 (7)0.0627 (8)0.0467 (7)0.0100 (6)−0.0004 (5)0.0089 (6)
C40.0443 (9)0.0813 (14)0.0411 (9)0.000−0.0018 (8)0.000
C50.0460 (8)0.0335 (8)0.0380 (8)0.0000.0035 (7)0.000
N40.0818 (13)0.1110 (19)0.0732 (13)0.000−0.0344 (11)0.000
N10.0655 (7)0.0379 (6)0.0618 (7)0.0026 (5)−0.0206 (5)−0.0012 (5)
N20.0656 (10)0.0446 (9)0.0587 (9)0.000−0.0226 (8)0.000
C60.0419 (8)0.0398 (8)0.0460 (8)0.000−0.0036 (7)0.000

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O1—C51.2575 (11)C4—N41.390 (3)
C1—C2i1.3910 (13)C5—O1i1.2575 (11)
C1—C21.3910 (13)N4—H40.89 (2)
C1—C51.490 (2)N1—C61.3188 (13)
C2—C31.3796 (17)N1—H1A0.940 (15)
C2—H20.9300N1—H1B0.875 (16)
C3—C41.3886 (15)N2—C61.329 (2)
C3—H30.9300N2—H2A0.923 (16)
C4—C3i1.3886 (15)C6—N1i1.3188 (13)
C2i—C1—C2117.65 (14)O1—C5—O1i122.98 (14)
C2i—C1—C5121.18 (7)O1—C5—C1118.50 (7)
C2—C1—C5121.18 (7)O1i—C5—C1118.50 (7)
C3—C2—C1121.34 (11)C4—N4—H4113.7 (13)
C3—C2—H2119.3C6—N1—H1A119.5 (8)
C1—C2—H2119.3C6—N1—H1B118.1 (10)
C2—C3—C4120.50 (12)H1A—N1—H1B121.7 (13)
C2—C3—H3119.7C6—N2—H2A115.3 (9)
C4—C3—H3119.7N1i—C6—N1119.95 (15)
C3—C4—C3i118.64 (15)N1i—C6—N2120.02 (8)
C3—C4—N4120.68 (8)N1—C6—N2120.02 (8)
C3i—C4—N4120.68 (8)
C2i—C1—C2—C31.2 (2)C2i—C1—C5—O1−179.70 (13)
C5—C1—C2—C3−179.36 (12)C2—C1—C5—O10.8 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.1 (2)C2i—C1—C5—O1i−0.8 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C3i−1.0 (3)C2—C1—C5—O1i179.70 (13)
C2—C3—C4—N4179.23 (16)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1ii0.940 (15)1.869 (16)2.8068 (14)175.4 (13)
N1—H1B···O1iii0.875 (16)2.107 (16)2.9032 (15)151.0 (13)
N2—H2A···O1iii0.923 (16)2.099 (16)2.9408 (8)151.1 (12)

Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y, z+1; (iii) −x+1/2, −y, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: DS2019).

References

  • Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.
  • Bruker (2003). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Gracin, S. & Rasmuson, A. C. (2004). Cryst. Growth Des.4, 1013–1023.
  • Pereira Silva, P. S., Ramos Silva, M., Paixão, J. A. & Matos Beja, A. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o2783.
  • Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.
  • Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [PubMed]
  • Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zyss, J., Pecaut, J., Levy, J. P. & Masse, R. (1993). Acta Cryst. B49, 334–342.

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography