|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Conceived and designed the experiments: MB SA DG CV AG EVA. Performed the experiments: MB SA EF SS. Analyzed the data: MB SA DG CV AG AS EVA. Wrote the paper: MB SA EVA.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal illness whose pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests oxidative stress as a key player in the establishment/progression of lung fibrosis in animal models and possibly in human IPF. The aim of the present study was to characterize the cellular phenotype of fibroblasts derived from IPF patients and identify underlying molecular mechanisms.
We first analyzed the baseline differentiation features and growth ability of primary lung fibroblasts derived from 7 histology proven IPF patients and 4 control subjects at different culture passages. Then, we focused on the redox state and related molecular pathways of IPF fibroblasts and investigated the impact of oxidative stress in the establishment of the IPF phenotype. IPF fibroblasts were differentiated into alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA)-positive myofibroblasts, displayed a pro-fibrotic phenotype as expressing type-I collagen, and proliferated lower than controls cells. The IPF phenotype was inducible upon oxidative stress in control cells and was sensitive to ROS scavenging. IPF fibroblasts also contained large excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to the activation of an NADPH oxidase-like system, displayed higher levels of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins and were more resistant to oxidative-stress induced cell death. Interestingly, the IPF traits disappeared with time in culture, indicating a transient effect of the initial trigger.
Robust expression of α-SMA and type-I collagen, high and uniformly-distributed ROS levels, resistance to oxidative-stress induced cell death and constitutive activation of tyrosine kinase(s) signalling are distinctive features of the IPF phenotype. We suggest that this phenotype can be used as a model to identify the initial trigger of IPF.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and lethal lung disorder with a mean survival of 3–6 years from the onset of symptoms. Histology of IPF shows the features of usual interstitial pneumonia with patchy distribution of fibrosis adjacent to fibroblastic foci (FF) . IPF appears to be an “epithelial-fibroblastic disease” resulting from recurrent epithelial injury and abnormal wound repair . FF are composed of migrating and proliferating fibroblasts and of differentiated myofibroblasts accounting for extra-cellular matrix deposition slowly altering the alveolus structure. This explains the progressive and irreversible IPF nature and the prognostic value of the fibrosis extent , .
IPF pathogenesis is unknown and the role of inflammation remains controversial, since anti-inflammatory treatment does not produce significant benefit against the disease progression. Inflammation is likely the triggering event for the initiation of fibrosis; eventually, fibrosis self-maintains and progresses by an unknown process , . Recent studies have emphasized the role of oxidative stress as the molecular basis of lung fibrosis. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are key players in the establishment/progression of pulmonary fibrosis in animal models and possibly in human IPF –. There is evidence of disruption of the normal oxidant/antioxidant balance in the lungs of IPF patients. Deficiency of antioxidants, including glutathione and superoxide dismutase, has been found in the lower respiratory tract of IPF patients, while high levels of myeloperoxidase are associated with epithelial injury in the fibrotic lesions –.
Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts are recognized as the effector cells in normal wound healing and in the development of tissue fibrosis . Although the interaction of these cells with a large spectrum of growth factors involved in tissue remodelling has been extensively investigated in IPF, their relationship with oxidative stress remains poorly clarified. The aim of the present study was to characterize the baseline cellular phenotype of fibroblasts derived from IPF patients and to identify molecular targets underlying this phenotype.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for biomedical activities of the Universities of Naples, Ancona and Catania and by the Ethics Committee of the Monaldi hospital, Naples, all in Italy. Patients provided written informed consent.
Primary lines of human lung fibroblasts were established by using an outgrowth from explant following the method described by Jordana et al. . IPF cell lines were obtained from 7 patients affected by IPF (age range 48–60 y), undergoing surgical lung biopsy for diagnosis. Control fibroblasts were derived from normal lung tissue of 4 patients with tumour-free areas of lung lobes with early stage bronchial carcinoma (age range 45–55 y). Cells were grown under standard conditions at 37°C in 5% CO2 in DMEM with 1 g/l glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and used at 80–90% confluence at different culture passages. To distinguish experiments with different culture timing, cells used within passage VI were arbitrary referred as “early passage” while cells used later on through passages IX-XI were referred as “late passage”. Overall, early passage cells were defined as cells within 20–25 population doublings (PD), while late passage cells had a PD greater than 45. All reagents were purchased from GIBCO (Scotland, UK). All experiments were performed in duplicate.
Reagents used for cell treatments included: 1. H2O2 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA); 2. the recombinant human transforming growth factor (rhTGF)-β1 (Calbiochem, Merck Darmstadt, Germany); 3. the TGF-β receptor ALK5 inhibitor SB-431542 (Sigma); 4. the ROS scavenger, N-acetylcisteine (NAC, Sigma); and 5. the general oxidase inhibitor diphenyleneiodonium (DPI, Calbiochem). Additional treatments included the MEK kinase inhibitor UO126 and the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTKs) inhibitors AG1296 (PDGF-R inhibitor) and AG1478 (EGF-R inhibitor) (Calbiochem) . Dose-response curves were performed with all reagents.
Proliferation assays were performed in 96-well microtiter plates. Cells were cultured at a density of 1×103 viable cells per well for 48 h and pulsed for additional 24 h with 0.25 µCi/well of [3H] thymidine (Amersham, Pharmacia Biotech Buckinghamshire, UK). Cells were harvested on glass-fiber filters using a Tomtec (Orange) 96-well cell harvester and counted in a 1205 Betaplate liquid scintillation counter (Wallac). Results obtained from three wells were expressed as mean cpm±SD.
Non adherent and trypsin-treated adherent cells were collected and washed twice with cold PBS. Cell pellets were re-suspended in 1 ml of propidium iodide (PI) staining solution (PI 5 µg/ml). Samples were kept at room temperature (RT) in the dark and immediately analysed by flow cytometry (Cyan DAKO Cytomation, Colorado, USA). For each sample 30.000 events were acquired and PI positive cells were detected at a wavelength of 635 nm. Data analysis was carried out with the Summit software (version 4.3, DAKO).
Medium was removed from sub-confluent cultures. Cells were fixed with 3% formaldehyde for 10 min at RT, washed and incubated overnight at 37°C in staining solution containing 1 mg/ml X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside), purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA), 40 mM citric acid/sodium phosphate (pH 6.0), 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 150 mM NaCl, and 2 mM MgCl2. Cells were checked under a microscope for development of blue colour and the mean percentage of β-galactosidase-positive cells was calculated by counting 3 representative fields.
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Sigma) and two micrograms were reverse-transcribed with the Omniscript RT kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy) using random primers (1 µM) at 37°C for 1 h. Real time PCR was performed in triplicate in 20 µl reaction volumes using the Power SYBER Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR primers (0.2 µM) for human A2 type-I collagen used were: sense 5′-TCTGGAGAGGCTGGTACTGC-3′ and anti-sense 5′-GAGCACCAAGAAGACCCTGA-3′. PCR primers (2 µM) for human transforming growth factor (TGF)-β used were: sense 5′-ACTACTACGCCAAGGAGGTCAC-3′, anti sense 5′- TGCTTGAACTTGTCATAGATTTCG-3′. 18S RNA was used as reference (sense 5′-TCC CCA TGA ACG AGG AAT TC-3′ and anti-sense 5′-GTG TAC AAA GGG CAG GGA CTT-3′). All primers were purchased from Invitrogen (CA, USA). Real time PCR reactions were carried out in a MJ Mini™ Personal Thermal Cycler apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA). Melting curves were obtained by increasing the temperature from 60 to 95°C with a temperature transition rate of 0.5°C/sec. The comparative threshold cycle number (CT) method was used to assess the relative quantification of gene expression. The fold change of the target gene was calculated as 2−ΔΔ CT .
Fluorimetric determination of intracellular ROS generated by adherent cells was performed in a 24-well plate after loading with 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCHF-DA) (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), as previously described . The intracellular ROS content was also measured by flow cytometry (Cyan). Harvested cells were incubated with 5 µM DCHF-DA for 20 min in the dark at 37°C, washed and re-suspended in PBS. For each sample, 10.000 events were acquired and intracellular ROS formation was detected as a result of the oxidation of DCHF at a wavelength of 520 nm. Data analysis was carried out with the Summit software.
Superoxide anion release was estimated by means of the superoxide dismutase-inhibitable cytocrome c reduction, as previously described . Briefly, 15×103 cells/well were plated in 24-well plates and incubated in Krebs-Ringer phosphate buffer with glucose (145 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 5.7 mM NaPO4, 5.5 mM glucose [pH 7.4]) (KRPG) containing 80 µM ferricytochrome c (type III; Sigma), with or without SOD (final concentration 300 units/ml), in a total volume of 1 ml. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, the reaction was stopped by placing the culture supernatants in melting ice, and the absorbance was read at 550 nm in a Sclavo Reader SR400 spectrophotometer (Siena, Italy). An extinction coefficient of 21×103 M−1cm−1 was used for oxidized versus reduced cytochrome c.
Harvested cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% deoxycholate,0.1% sodium-dodecyl-sulfate, SDS) containing 2.5 mM Na-pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM NaVO4, 1 mM NaF and a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) for 30 min at 4°C. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 13.000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C and the concentration of cellular proteins was determined using the Bio-Rad assay (Bio-Rad). Cell proteins (20–30 µg) were mixed with a Laemmli buffer, separated on 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Protan, Whatman GmbH, Dassel, Germany) and hybridized with the following antibodies according to the manufacturer's instructions: mouse anti-α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) mAb (1500; Sigma), mouse anti-TGF-β mAb (1500; BD Pharmingen, New Jersey, US), mouse anti-p-ERK-1/2 mAb (11000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and mouse anti-phosphotyrosine (p-Tyr) mAb (11000; Upstate, Lake Placid, NY, USA). Membranes were incubated with an horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (12000; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and protein bands were revealed with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system detection kit (Roche). Immune-reactive bands were quantified by means of densitometry and normalized by mouse anti α-tubulin (13000; Cell Signalling Technologies, Boston, MA, USA) mAb.
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All comparisons were made on a head-to head basis using the paired or unpaired t test, where appropriate. One way repeated measures ANOVA with pot hoc Bonferroni correction was used, where appropriate. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with the GraphPad Prism 3 software package (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
To characterize the phenotype of IPF cells we measured the expression of the myofibroblast differentiation marker, α-SMA, and of type-I collagen. Expression of both molecules was increased in early passage IPF cells compared with control fibroblasts (Figure 1, A–B). Alpha-SMA expression increased in control and IPF fibroblasts with time in culture (Figure 1A), while that of type-I collagen was markedly reduced in late passage IPF cells and decreased further in control fibroblasts (Figure 1B). Proliferation of IPF cells, measured as DNA synthesis, was significantly less vigorous than that of control cells at early passages (Figure 1C). Proliferation significantly slowed down with time in culture in both cell types. However, expression of the senescence marker β-galactosidase was only barely detectable in both cell types with no substantial differences even at late passages (Figure 1D). Finally, to address whether the IPF phenotype was sustained by the ability of cells to produce growth factors, i.e. TGF-β, acting in an autocrine loop, α-SMA expression was analysed in early passage control fibroblasts conditioned for 48 h with the complete medium from control or IPF cell cultures. TGF-β is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a crucial role in a wide array of processes, including wound healing and fibrogenesis. It is stored in the extra-cellular matrix as an inactive molecule which becomes activated after tissue injury. There is evidence that, among others, the integrin-mediated activation of TGF-β is pivotal in IPF pathogenesis . As shown in Figure 2A, no significant differences in α-SMA expression occurred in the culture conditions used. These findings were not unexpected as integrin-mediated mechanisms were unlikely to have occurred in our experimental setting. Further, TGF-β protein levels were undetectable in both cell extracts and culture media from early passage control and IPF fibroblasts (Figure 2B). Also, no differences of TGF-β expression were appreciated at the mRNA level in control and IPF cells, both at early and at late passages (Figure 2C). Finally, sensitivity of early passage IPF fibroblasts to specific TGF-β receptor inhibition was assessed. As shown in Figure 2D, α-SMA expression was unchanged as compared to basal levels.
These data indicate that early passage IPF cells differ from control fibroblasts as: 1. are differentiated into myofibroblasts; 2. have a pro-fibrotic phenotype; and 3. proliferate less. Such a phenotype is not dependent upon the expression of growth factors, and especially of TGF-β, acting in an autocrine manner. Both cell types markedly slow down growth over time. This occurs along with myofibroblast differentiation with no evidence of ongoing senescence.
To investigate whether the phenotype of IPF cells was linked to oxidative stress we measured the expression of α-SMA and type-I collagen in control fibroblasts upon long-term challenge with H2O2. As shown in Figure 3A, α-SMA expression was robustly induced by H2O2 in a dose-dependent manner at 48 h. Time-course curves performed with a fixed concentration of H2O2 (200 µM) showed that induction of α-SMA expression increased over time, reaching the peak between 24 and 48 h (Figure 3B). Exposure to oxidative stress also accounted for higher expression of type-I collagen (Figure 3C). Under these conditions cell death was negligible, ranging from 8 to 13%. Conversely, as shown in Figure 3D, no further increase of α-SMA expression was appreciated in H2O2-treated early passage IPF fibroblasts. Short term incubation (15 min) with increasing concentrations of H2O2 induced death of early passage control fibroblasts in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4A). Similarly, control cells death also occurred in response to a fixed concentration of H2O2 in a time-dependent manner (Figure 4B). Conversely, early passage IPF cells were resistant to peroxide-induced cell death in both culture conditions (Figure 4, panels A–B). IPF cells also retained their resistance to oxidative-induced cell death at later passages, as shown in Figure 4 (C–D). Finally, to test whether the IPF phenotype was sensitive to anti-oxidants, control and IPF fibroblasts were treated for 48 h with the ROS scavenger NAC (5 mM). Figure 5 (A–B) shows that levels of α-SMA were not modified in control fibroblasts while significantly decreased upon treatment in IPF cells at early passages. This finding was associated with a concomitant reduction of type-I collagen expression in IPF fibroblasts (Figure 5C). Conversely, no changes in α-SMA and collagen expression occurred in NAC-exposed IPF cells at late passages (Figure 5, panels D–E).
These data indicate that: 1. ROS stimulate normal fibroblasts to differentiate into type-I collagen expressing myofibroblasts; 2. conversely, ROS scavenging inhibits α-SMA and type-I collagen expression in IPF cells; and 3. myofibroblast differentiation of IPF cells confers resistance to oxidative stress-induced cell death.
To dissect the nature of the signal(s) that characterizes the IPF phenotype, we measured the spontaneous ability of IPF and control fibroblasts to generate ROS. Mean basal ROS levels were significantly higher in early passage IPF fibroblasts compared with control cells, while no significant differences were recorded at late culture passages (Figure 6A). Flow cytometry analysis showed that early passage IPF fibroblasts were distributed as a cluster of highly fluorescent ROS-expressing cells (Figure 6B). Conversely, the distribution of fluorescent control cells analysed at the same culture passages was diffuse and heterogeneous. With time in culture the distribution pattern of ROS-expressing IPF cells became diffuse in a wider range of fluorescence similarly to control fibroblasts. To confirm the higher ability of IPF fibroblasts to generate ROS we measured the levels of superoxide anion released. Early passage IPF fibroblasts expressed higher superoxide anion levels compared with control cells (Figure 6C). No differences in superoxide anion release were found at late passages.
These data indicate that early passage IPF fibroblasts: 1. express high levels of ROS and superoxide anion in comparison with control cells; and 2. are undistinguishable from control cells with respect to ROS generation at late passages.
To strengthen these observations we sought to identify the source of ROS. It is known that ROS activate MEK and ERK1/2 through the inhibition of tyrosine phosphatases , : thus, ERK phosphorylation is inducible by ROS and ROS-induced p-ERK levels are sensitive to treatment with anti-oxidants or oxidase inhibitors. Basal levels of p-ERK were analysed in control and IPF fibroblasts at different culture passages. Then, since NADPH oxidase is the main source of O2- in most cell types , changes of p-ERK expression were also analysed in response to cell treatment with the membrane NADPH oxidase inhibitor, DPI. As shown in Figure 7A, basal p-ERK expression was significantly higher in early passage IPF cells in comparison with the control ones. In addition, p-ERK levels significantly decreased in IPF fibroblasts in response to DPI. Conversely, control cells were insensitive to oxidase inhibition. No differences of p-ERK expression were detectable in control and IPF cells at late passages (Figure 7B). Similarly to control fibroblasts, IPF cells also became insensitive to DPI treatment. To further strengthen these observations, modulation of p-ERK levels upon H2O2 exposure was assessed in early passage control fibroblasts. As shown in Figure 7C, ERK phosphorylation was inducible in a dose dependent manner by H2O2 and this effect was inhibited by pre-treating cells with the ROS scavenger, NAC. Conversely, no further increase of p-ERK levels was detectable in response to H2O2 in early passage IPF cells that however were sensitive to NAC (Figure 7D). Finally, to address whether α-SMA expression was dependent upon ERK activation, modulation of peroxide-induced α-SMA expression was analysed in control fibroblasts pre-treated with the MEK kinase inhibitor UO126 (10 µM). As shown in Figure 7E, α-SMA was induced in response to H2O2 while was significantly decreased in UO126 pre-treated cells. Similarly, α-SMA expression did also decrease in IPF cells upon UO126 treatment.
These data indicate that IPF fibroblasts: 1. display an active NADPH-oxidase like system accounting for ROS formation; 2. contain active ERK1/2 which is an exquisite sensor of the activation status of such a system, and 3. α-SMA expression is maintained by ROS generation through ERK activation.
NADPH oxidase may be activated by a wide array of receptors for growth factors, including receptor tyrosine kinase(s) (RTKs) –. In addition, NADPH-generated ROS can themselves sustain signalling of RTKs through the inhibition of tyrosine phosphatases . To test this issue, we asked whether ROS rise in IPF cells was associated with activation of tyrosine kinase(s) signalling. Figure 8A shows that IPF cells displayed higher basal levels of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins than control cells. Levels of tyrosine phosphorylation were decreased in IPF cells at late passages (Figure 8A). Tyrosine phosphorylation was inducible by H2O2 in control fibroblasts and this effect was inhibited by pre-treatment of cells with the ROS scavenger NAC (Figure 8B). In a similar manner, p-tyrosine levels also decreased in NAC treated IPF fibroblasts (Figure 8B). These findings are relevant as corroborate previous data indicating that switch-off of RTKs may have a beneficial effect in IPF through the inhibition of myofibroblast differentiation –. To address whether this was the case in our setting, we measured α-SMA expression in IPF cells upon inhibition of RTKs. Although we did not analyse the specific receptor involved, inhibition of RTKs was associated with a marked reduction of α-SMA levels in IPF cells. Conversely, α-SMA expression remained unchanged in control fibroblasts (Figure 8C). However, peroxide-induced α-SMA expression was sensitive to RTKs inhibition in control fibroblasts as shown in Figure 8D.
In conclusion, these observations suggest that tyrosine kinase(s) signalling: 1. is constitutively activated in IPF cells; 2. is inducible upon oxidative stress while, conversely, is inhibited by anti-oxidants; and 3. is required for myofibroblast differentiation.
Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts are key effectors in wound healing and are thought to be crucial players in IPF pathogenesis through an unabated continuation of the repair process after the resolution of inflammation . ROS mediate multiple cellular functions, including proliferation, apoptosis, migration and differentiation , , all crucial events to tissue homeostasis and remodelling. Although ROS have been implicated in IPF pathogenesis, there is no conclusive evidence linking ROS metabolism to the phenotype of fibroblasts derived from IPF patients. To dissect the mechanism(s) underlying the disease, we first characterized the baseline phenotype of primary lung fibroblasts of IPF patients. Then, we focused on the redox state of IPF fibroblasts and investigated whether IPF features were influenced by oxidative stress. We found that, unlike control fibroblasts that predominantly showed a proliferative pattern, IFP cells were differentiated into myofibroblasts and displayed a pro-fibrotic phenotype. Previous studies have reported contrasting proliferative characteristics of human “fibrotic” fibroblasts , . In our setting, IPF cells proliferated significantly less than control fibroblasts since the earliest culture passages corresponding to the first 20–25 PD. However, along with time in culture differences were no more appreciated as proliferation of IPF and control cells drastically slowed down. The absence of visible signs of senescence (β-galactosidase) which instead was associated with an increased α-SMA expression in both cell types over time in culture suggests that the progressive growth slow down was dependent on accelerated differentiation rather than on senescence . IPF cells also displayed an increased ability to express higher levels of collagen expression than control fibroblasts at early passages. It is noteworthy that acquisition of the myofibroblast phenotype is necessary for collagen expression and that this effect is persistent and irreversible even after the removal of the inducing factor . However, in our setting this ability was lost along with culture passages suggesting that the effect of the triggering factor was diluted out over time thus leading to the establishment of a quiescent phenotype.
In line with previous observations , IPF fibroblasts were committed to generate high ROS levels, and clustering of ROS-forming cells accounted for an increased amount of oxidants per cell. Interestingly, also the ability to produce ROS was lost with time in culture, as late passage IPF fibroblasts became undistinguishable from control cells. Altogether, these findings clearly suggest that IPF fibroblasts have a definitive functional lifespan and identify a precise temporal window to appreciate the differences between IPF and control fibroblasts.
As previously reported in skin fibroblasts obtained from systemic sclerosis patients , ROS generation in IPF fibroblasts occurred through the activation of a NADPH-like oxidase system. Indeed, levels of active ERK, which is an exquisite sensor of intracellular ROS rise, were susceptible to oxidase inhibition . It has been recently shown that NADPH oxidase generation of H2O2 is required for TGF-β mediated fibrogenesis in a murine model of lung fibrosis and similar data have also been confirmed in human fibroblasts in vitro , . In agreement with these observations we found that exogenous hydrogen peroxide strongly induced control fibroblasts to differentiate into type-I collagen expressing myofibroblasts. In addition, exposure to oxidative stress also accounted for activation of tyrosine kinase(s) signalling suggesting the existence of a link between such a pathway and cell differentiation. It is likely that the NADPH-related ROS rise in IPF cells derives from the constitutive activation of a wide array of receptors for growth factors, also including RTKs –. Although we did not look at the activation status of a specific tyrosine kinase receptor, we found that tyrosine kinase(s) signalling was activated in IPF cells and that RTKs activity was necessary for the maintenance of the IPF phenotype. There is evidence that in the presence of high ROS levels ,  several receptors may be stabilized allowing cells to become more sensitive to sub-threshold concentrations of growth factors and cytokines. This sets on a circuitry linking growth factor receptors, including RTKs, NADPH oxidase and ROS, which self-maintains and propagates locally the inflammatory focus . Far from being multiple discrete lesions, recent evidence suggests FF as a complex non-malignant reactive process responsive to local environmental stimuli. The formation of a fibroblast reticulum is consistent with a “wave” of fibrosis starting from the pleura and progressing through the lung parenchyma . In this context, we suggest that the auto-amplificatory loop (RTKs, NADPH, ROS-pERK1/2) may be operating in the fibroblast reticulum where the progression of a “wave of oxidation” promotes through the freely ROS diffusion both cell to cell communication and myofibroblast differentiation.
In conclusion, the present study highlights the existence of a baseline distinctive molecular IPF phenotype characterized by an imbalanced redox state which self maintains in culture apart from the involvement of any triggering growth factor either exogenously added or acting in an autocrine manner. Although recent evidences suggest a role of autocrine TGF-β generation in maintaining the myofibroblastic phenotype in areas of fibrosis , we did not confirm these data in our setting. This phenotype confers resistance to oxidative stress-induced cell death, can be induced by ROS in control fibroblasts and is inhibited by ROS scavenging. Most importantly, the IPF trait is transient, since it is progressively lost along with time in culture. We suggest this measurable phenotype of IPF as an assay amenable for investigating the molecular signal(s) that initiate the events we described and for testing and validation of target specific therapies. It remains to be seen the site and the nature of the primary IPF trigger.
The authors wish to thank Dr. Adriana Gallo (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Napoli) and Dr. Antonio Porcellini (Dipartimento di Scienze per la Salute, Università del Molise) for helpful comments.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work has been supported by Associazione Italiana per la Lotta al Cancro (A.I.R.C.) and by a generous grant from Fondazione Cariverona. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.