|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the liver that is characterized by progressive cholestasis and the development of secondary biliary cirrhosis. There is no widely recognized therapy for this disease, although anti-inflammatory agents (steroids), immunosuppressive agents (methotrexate), anti-fibrotics (colchicine), and choleretic agents (ursodeoxycholic acid) have been used in various small series. In the present study, Tacrolimus (FK 506), a new and powerful immunosuppressive macrolide antibiotic, has been used to treat 10 patients with PSC. Each subject had a liver biopsy, ERCP with visualization of the intra-and extrahepatic biliary tree, and a panel of hematological, serological, and biochemical laboratory tests before the initiation of the FK 506 therapy. The FK 506 was administered orally at 12-h intervals and was monitored by serial plasma FK 506 trough levels. After 360 days of treatment, the median serum bilirubin level was reduced by 75%, and the serum alkaline phosphatase was reduced by 70%. Moreover, the serum ALT and AST levels were reduced by 80 and 86%, respectively. No change in the serum level of BUN and creatinine levels occurred as a consequence of the FK 506 treatment These data demonstrate that: 1) FK 506 can be used to treat PSC; 2) the response to FK 506 by patients with PSC is rapid; and, 3) no adverse effect on the serum BUN and creatinine levels was observed. It is anticipated that FK 506 will become an important agent for the treatment of patients with PSC because of its powerful immunosuppressive activity.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the biliary tree that is characterized by a focal, albeit diffuse, destruction of the large- and medium-sized bile ducts (1–11). The disease is characterized pathophysiologically by cholestasis (1, 2). Endoscopically and histologically, biliary strictures and diverticula characterize the disease process (8–11).
The specific etiology of PSC is unknown, although because of its association with inflammatory bowel disease, especially ulcerative colitis but also Crohn’s colitis and HLA antigens B8, Dr3, and DrBW52, it is thought to be a disease of disordered immunity (12–21). As such, a variety of pharmacological agents directed at modifying the immune response have been used to treat PSC. These include antibiotics, bile acid absorbants, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine, methotrexate, and d-penicillamine), and choleretic agents (cheno- and ursodeoxycholic acid), the latter two of which may also modulate the expression of HLA antigens on hepatobiliary epithelial cells (22–34). In advanced cases, liver transplantation has been used as a therapy (35–36). Moreover, resection of the damaged colon in cases of ulcerative colitis has been used, albeit unsuccessfully, to halt or ameliorate disease progression (37).
The present open-label preliminary study was initiated to investigate the efficacy and potential toxicity of Tacrolimus (FK 506), a powerful new macrolide antibiotic-possessing immunosuppressive activity, as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of PSC.
A total of 10 subjects with a documented diagnosis of PSC were studied. Each had either an ERCP- or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram (PTHC)-confirmed diagnosis of PSC supported by the results of a percutaneous liver biopsy demonstrating a chronic inflammatory condition of the liver, particularly the portal areas with a characteristic pericholangiolar inflammatory and fibrotic reaction (11, 12).
Each subject underwent a thorough pretherapy evaluation consisting of the following studies:
After the pretherapy evaluation procedures were completed, each subject was given FK 506 at a starting dose of 0.075 mg/kg taken orally as two equally divided doses taken 12 h apart. The initial dose was either increased or decreased at 2-wk intervals to achieve a trough serum FK 506 level between 0.6 and 1.0 ng/ml. All FK 506 serum levels were obtained after an overnight fast and before the next morning’s dose (38).
Initially, all subjects were seen weekly (approximately four visits), then bi-weekly (2–3 visits), then monthly (2–3 visits), and finally quarterly, until a 1-yr study period was completed. At each visit, the following studies were obtained:
At the end of a 1-yr study period, all of the studies performed as part of the prestudy evaluation were repeated. All liver biopsies were read blindly by pathologists unaware of the source of the biopsy study objectives.
This study was approved by the committee reviewing clinical research in human subjects at the University of Pittsburgh before its initiation.
All results are presented as mean values ± SEM. All data were compared using the entry and exit measures. The Student’s t test and ANOVA were used for the statistical analyses. A p value <0.05 was considered to be significant.
A total of 10 subjects were enrolled in this open-label, preliminary study evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of FK 506 in the treatment of PSC. The demographic information in the 10 subjects studied is shown in Table 1. Most were male; 60% had co-existent ulcerative colitis, and all were positive for HLA antigens B8, Dr3, and DrBW52. The mean hepatic volume of the group was increased by 50% compared with normal values. The mean time required to achieve a stable serum level of FK 506 between 0.6 and 1.0 ng/ml and to maintain renal function at acceptable levels was 7.5 ± 2.5 wk. The mean FK dose prescribed on a daily basis was 10.5 ± 2.8 mg/day, whereas the mean daily dose on a per kg basis was 0.15 ± 0.04 mg/kg/day.
Associated with FK 506 treatment, the serum alk phos and bilirubin levels fell, as shown in Figure 1. The alk phos level declined by more than 50% from a level 3.5 times normal to 1.5 times normal (p < 0.01). The serum bilirubin level returned to the normal range (p < 0.01). Figure 2 and Table 2 show the data for serum bilirubin, AST, and ALT. Both enzymes fell markedly with FK 506 treatment to levels just outside and inside the normal range, respectively (p < 0.01). The BUN level increased minimally, whereas the serum creatinine level remained unchanged. The changes in the serum BUN and creatinine levels at quarterly intervals are shown in Figure 3 along with the plasma FK 506 levels and the dose administered.
No changes in the hepatic volume or ERCP findings were observed over the course of the 1-yr of FK 506 therapy. Similarly, no change in the colonoscopic findings were observed over the 1-yr course of FK 506 therapy. The patients did report a reduction in pruritis grade (p < 0.05) and frequency of bowel movements (p < 0.05) associated with the use of FK 506 compared with pre-FK 506 levels.
When the liver biopsies obtained pre- and post-1 yr of FK 506 therapy were compared in a blinded fashion, little or no statistical difference was seen between the two biopsies. Thus, although this was no histological regression, there also was no identifiable progression.
This is the first report on the use of FK 506, a macrolide antibiotic isolated from streptomyces tsukubaenis that has powerful immunosuppressive activity that has been estimated to be 10–100 times more powerful than cyclosporine when it has been studied in various in vitro assay systems assessing T cell functional activity (39).
FK 506 has been studied extensively in transplant patients, including those with liver, kidney, and intestinal grafts (40–42). In each case, FK 506 has been shown to be at least as good, if not better, than cyclosporine at preventing allograft rejection (40–42). Unlike cyclosporine, increasing doses of FK 506 can be used to treat an acute cellular rejection episode (44–47). Moreover, FK 506, unlike cyclosporine, has been shown to be capable of reversing early chronic allograft rejection (44–47)
These unique advantages of FK 506 and its relative ease of administration, coupled with the ability to monitor its blood levels and adjust the dosing schedule as necessary to either enhance efficacy or reduce toxicity, have made it a particularly attractive agent for the clinical treatment of a variety of putative autoimmune diseases. PSC is one of these diseases.
As shown in Figures 1, ,2,2, and and33 and in Table 2, FK 506 has been shown to be very effective at controlling the relentless biliary destruction and cholestasis that characterizes PSC as assessed biochemically. The serum levels of alk phos, bilirubin, and both aminotransferases fell rapidly to either normal or near normal values.
The cost of this improvement in the course of PSC in terms of drug toxicity has been mild to nonexistent as shown in Figures 3 and and4.4. Only minor changes in renal function and a transient fall in the platelet count were observed in response to FK 506 treatment.
Moreover, the immunosuppressive activity of FK 506 had the added advantage, not directly assessed as part of this study but nonetheless obvious to the physicians and surgeons caring for these patients, that the enhanced control of their liver disease was associated with control of underlying inflammatory bowel disease. It should be pointed out, however, that improvement in the various biochemical values used to assess hepatic injury may not be adequate in defining the long term clinical course of a disease such as primary sclerosing cholangitis. The effects on survival, the need for transplantation, longer term changes on hepatic biopsy, and, possibly, changes on cholangiography may all be more important parameters to be assessed in future studies.
Nonetheless, based on this preliminary open-label trial evaluating the efficacy of FK 506 in the clinical management of PSC, the investigators believe that a randomized controlled study comparing FK 506 to ursodeoxycholic acid or possibly methotrexate is indicated. These latter two agents also have been reported to be efficacious in cases of PSC, the former in several small trials and the latter in a trial from a single institution. The effects achieved with both of these other agents have been assessed primarily on the basis of clinical parameters. Nonetheless, based on the evidence available, each appears to be somewhat effective. Only by a direct comparison, probably as a result of a multi-center trial, will the practitioner be able to make a rational choice between these new agents.