Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(11): e13992.
Published online 2010 November 15. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0013992
PMCID: PMC2981565

Analysis of Mice Lacking DNaseI Hypersensitive Sites at the 5′ End of the IgH Locus

Sebastian D. Fugmann, Editor


The 5′ end of the IgH locus contains a cluster of DNaseI hypersensitive sites, one of which (HS1) was shown to be pro-B cell specific and to contain binding sites for the transcription factors PU.1, E2A, and Pax5. These data as well as the location of the hypersensitive sites at the 5′ border of the IgH locus suggested a possible regulatory function for these elements with respect to the IgH locus. To test this notion, we generated mice carrying targeted deletions of either the pro-B cell specific site HS1 or the whole cluster of DNaseI hypersensitive sites. Lymphocytes carrying these deletions appear to undergo normal development, and mutant B cells do not exhibit any obvious defects in V(D)J recombination, allelic exclusion, or class switch recombination. We conclude that deletion of these DNaseI hypersensitive sites does not have an obvious impact on the IgH locus or B cell development.


The variable region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) is assembled from V (variable), D (diversity), and J (joining) gene segments that lie upstream of several IgH constant (C) region exons in a process called V(D)J recombination [1]. The mouse IgH locus contains large numbers of VH segments and multiple D and JH segments but an individual IgH V(D)J exon is assembled from only one VH, one D, and one JH segment.

V(D)J recombination of the IgH locus takes place in pro-B cells in an ordered way such that D to JH recombination precedes VH to DJH recombination [2]. In this regard, activation of the IgH locus is thought to progress in a stepwise manner [3]. D to JH rearrangement efficiently occurs on both alleles, however, allelic exclusion ensures that VH to DJH recombination results in expression of a functional heavy chain (HC) from only one of the two alleles [4].

Mature B-cells can undergo further alterations of their HCs. IgH class switch recombination (CSR) causes expression of different immunoglobulin isotypes which confer different effector functions. During this recombination process one of several sets of downstream CH exons replaces the Cµ exons and the intervening sequence is deleted from the chromosome, which results in expression of a new C region without changing the specificity of the IgH variable region [5].

A large effort has been made to elucidate mechanisms of IgH locus regulation and a number of cis-regulatory elements have been described and characterized. The IgH intronic enhancer (Eµ) resides in the JH – CH intron and was shown to be necessary for efficient V(D)J recombination by promoting both D to JH and VH to DJH recombination [6], [7]. Downstream of the CH genes at the very 3′ end of the IgH locus a cluster of DNaseI hypersensitive sites was described, termed 3′ IgH regulatory region (3′IgH RR). So far two main functions have been assigned to this regulatory region: the 3′IgH RR plays an important role in promoting CSR to most IgH isotypes, and the 3′IgH RR was shown to be necessary for high level expression of the functionally assembled HC gene from the promoter 5′ of the VHDJH exon [8].

An additional potential regulatory region was identified at the 5′ end of the IgH locus, consisting of four DNaseI hypersensitive sites [9]. One of these sites, HS1, was shown to be pro-B cell specific, the stage during which IgH V(D)J recombination takes place, and was suggested to include binding sites for the transcription factors PU.1, Pax5 and E2A [9]. These observations led to the suggestion that this region might represent a new regulatory region for IgH rearrangements. In this regard, the 5′ end of the IgH locus is an attractive location for a regulatory element because it would not be deleted during the course of V(D)J recombination, and it might explain control of several unresolved phenomena in the IgH locus. Among these is the regulation of VH germline transcripts as so far no cis-regulatory element has been identified that controls activity of the bulk of unrearranged VH promoters. Furthermore, it is not known how it is achieved that proximal and distal VH segments are activated independently or why usage of distal versus proximal VH gene families varies significantly.

Here we report the targeted deletion of the pro-B cell specific 5′IgH HS1 as well as combined deletion of HS1, HS2, HS3a,b in mice. We analyzed potential implications on B cell development, V(D)J recombination, and IgH CSR.


Targeted deletion of 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites in ES cells and generation of mutant mice

All mouse were handled in strict accordance with good animal practice as defined by the relevant national and/or local animal welfare bodies, and all animal work was approved by Animal Research of Children's Hospital Boston (Protocol # 08 11 1253R). The RHS1 targeting vector was assembled in pLNTK [10]. As a 5′ homology arm a 2.2 kb PCR product was generated with primers 5′ GTCGACGGATTTAGGAGGATACACAAC 3′ and 5′ GTCGACCTTGGATAACACAGAACTCTG 3′ containing a SalI site at their 5′ ends, which facilitate cloning of the PCR product into the SalI site of pLNTK. As a 3′ homology arm a 7.3 kb AatII – ApaI fragment was blunt end cloned into the XhoI site of pLNTK. The R3′HSs targeting vector was generated by blunt end cloning a 4.4 kb EcoRI fragment into the SalI site of pLNTK as a 5′ homology arm, and a 7.0 kb KpnI fragment into the XhoI site as the 3′ homology arm. Correct targeting events and cre – loxP deletion events were confirmed by Southern blotting (Fig 1). Probe 1 is a 830 bp PCR product amplified with primers 5′ GCTCATGTACCAATCTGCACTCAC 3′ and 5′ CACTGTGACCTCCATCTTATGTCTG 3′. Probe 2 is a 1.2 kb PstI – EcoRI fragment 5′ of HS2. Probe 3 is a 0.8 kb PstI – XbaI fragment about 11 kb 3′ of HS3b. To confirm single integration of the targeting vectors a 525 bp NeoR probe was used, amplified with primers 5′ GCAGCCATATGGGATCGGC 3′ and 5′ GTTCGGCTGGCGCGAGCCCC 3′.

Figure 1
Targeting strategy for the generation of the RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs alleles.

EF1 heterozygous IgHa/b embryonic stem (ES) cells, generated in the Alt laboratory, were transfected with PvuI linearized RHS1 targeting vector to obtain RHS1/+ ES cells. To obtain ΔHS1/+ ES cells, the PGK-NeoR cassette was deleted by applying a Cre – expressing adenovirus vector. ΔHS1/+ ES cells were transfected with PvuI linearized R3′HSs targeting vector to obtain R3HSs/+ ES cells. R3HSs/+ ES cells were selected for homozygocity of the targeted allele through increasing concentration of G418 to obtain R3HSs/R3HSs ES cells. Cre – loxP mediated deletion of the PGK-NeoR cassette resulted in ΔHSs/ΔHSs ES cells. Targeted ES cells were injected into Rag2-/- blastocysts to obtain RDBC chimeras [11] or into C57BL/6 blastocysts to obtain chimeras that could be crossed to 129Sv mice to achieve germline transmission of the targeted allele.

B cell hybridomas

CD43- splenocytes were isolated by MACS, stimulated with LPS (20 µg/ml), and fused to NS-1 plasmacytoma cells (TIB-18, ATCC) as described previously [12]. IgH V(D)J rearrangement status was analyzed by Southern blotting of EcoRI digested genomic DNA of clonal hybridomas with three different probes, a 1.6 kb HindIII - EcoRI fragment 3′ of JH4, a 0.38 kb SacI - ApaI fragment 3′ of DHQ52, and a 0.75 kb PCR product 5′ of DHFL16.1 generated with oligonucleotides 5′ GAACAGCAACCCTTGACTGACTCTG 3′ and 5′ GATTGGTTCTTATGGAATGGGTGG 3′.

PCR assay for V(D)J rearrangements

Pro-B cells (IgM- B220+ CD43hi), pre B-cells (IgM- B220+ CD43lo), and double positive T-cells (B220- CD4+ CD8+) were isolated by FACS on a FACSAria (BD Biosciences) and genomic DNA was extracted. 50 ng DNA or 5-fold dilutions were analyzed by PCR for DH–JH, VH-DJH, Vκ–Jκ, and Vλ–Jλ rearrangements with primers listed in Table S1. Input DNA amounts were normalized upon PCR amplification within DLG5. PCR was performed at 95°C for 4′, 30 cycles of 95°C for 30″, 60°C for 90″, and 72°C for 2′, followed by 72°C for 5′. PCR products were transferred from ethidium bromide gels to nylon membranes and visualized with end labeled oligonucleotide probes (Table S1). CDR 3 lengths were generated from IgH VDH rearrangements from mature B cells using oligonucleotides for V558 and JH4 rearrangements. PCR fragments were amplified using iProof (Bio-Rad) polymerase and cloned into Zero Blunt Topo vectors (Invitrogen), and sequenced.

IgH class switch recombination assay

CD43- splenocytes were isolated by MACS, cultured with LPS or IL4/αCD40, and analyzed by flow cytometry as described previously [13].

RT-PCR analysis

RNA was extracted using TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche). 200 ng–1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed for one hour at 50°C using random hexamers (Roche) and Superscript III (Invitrogen) reverse transcriptase. PCR was performed at 94°C for 4′, 30–39 cycles of 94°C for 30″, annealing temperature (Table S1) for 30″, 72°C for 30″, followed by 72°C for 5′. cDNA input amount was normalized upon PCR amplification of β-actin cDNA. PCR products were visualized on ethidium bromide gels and/or subsequently transferred to nylon membranes and visualized with end labeled oligonucleotide probes (Table S1).

Flow cytometry and cell sorting

Single cell suspensions from spleen, thymus, or bone marrow were stained in PBS 2% FBS with various antibodies: FITC-αIgM, PE-Cy5-αB220, PE-αCD8a, PE-αCD43, FITC-αLy9.1, APC-αIgM, APC-Cy7-αB220 (BD Pharmingen), PE-αAA4.1, FITC-αCD4 (eBioscience). FACS analysis was performed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) and a FACSAria (BD Biosciences) apparatus. Cell sorts were performed on a FACSAria (BD Biosciences) apparatus.


Generation of mice with targeted deletion of 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites

To determine the in vivo function of the cluster of DNaseI hypersensitive sites described at the 5′ end of the IgH locus [9] we first replaced a ~340 bp BccI – AatII fragment, harboring HS1, with a loxP flanked PGK-NeoR cassette. All targeting experiments were performed in heterozygous IgHa/b EF1 ES cells which have the advantage that IgHa (129 strain) and IgHb (C57BL/6 strain) alleles can be distinguished by antibodies against the different allotypes or by detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP). Targeting vector homology arms were cloned from 129 strain genomic DNA, resulting in correct targeting events only on the IgHa allele. In heterozygous targeted ES cells, the IgHb allele always remained in the untargeted wildtype configuration.

Targetings were performed with the RHS1 targeting vector (Fig. 1A) to obtain the RHS1 allele and, upon cre/loxP deletion, the ΔHS1 allele. Correct targeting events (Fig1) and single integration of the targeting vector (Figure S1) were confirmed by Southern blotting. Subsequently, targeted ES cells were injected into Rag2-/- blastocysts to obtain Rag-deficient blastocyst complementation (RDBC) chimeras, and into wildtype blastocyts to generate mice that carry the RHS1 or ΔHS1 allele in their germline. In order to delete all four hypersensitivity sites (HS1, HS2, HS3a, and HS3b), ES cells containing the ΔHS1 allele were targeted with the R3′HSs targeting vector to obtain the R3HSs allele (Fig. 1B). Cre/loxP recombination between the loxP site originating from the ΔHS1 allele and the loxP site 3′ of the PGK-NeoR cassette results in the replacement of a 8.9 kb region, harboring all described 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites, with a single loxP site, referred to as the ΔHSs allele. Germline transmission could not be achieved for either of the R3HSs or ΔHSs heterozygous ES cell lines. Therefore, we placed ES cells containing the R3HSs allele under increasing concentrations of G418 to select for homozygous mutant ES cells. The homozygous mutant ES cells were subsequently subjected to cre/loxP recombination to delete the Neor gene and generate ES cells homozygous for the ΔHSs allele. The homozygous mutant ΔHSs ES cells were injected into Rag2-/- blastocysts, and chimeras generated by RDBC and lymphocytes were analyzed.

Development of homozygous RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs lymphocytes

Lymphocytes of different developmental stages can be identified by FACS analysis of cells from lymphoid tissues such as bone marrow, thymus, or spleen. We analyzed 8 week old wildtype mice, homozygous RHS1, and homozygous ΔHS1 mice that carry the mutant alleles in their germline, as well as lymphocytes from RDBC chimeras generated from homozygous ΔHSs ES cells (Fig. 2). In wildtype bone marrow, pro-B cells can be identified as IgM- B220+ CD43hi and pre-B cells as IgM- B220+ CD43lo cells, respectively. Defects in B-cell development can be revealed by the increase or decrease of certain lymphocyte populations. In this regard, impaired IgH V(D)J recombination leads to an accumulation of pro-B cells and to reduced numbers of pre-B cells [7]. We performed FACS analyses of bone marrow from three mice of each genotype to measure the percentage of pro- and pre-B cells in the lymphocyte gate. These analyses revealed the average percentage (± standard deviation) of pro-B and pre-B cells, respectively of B220+/CD43+ events in the total lymphocyte gate were 14±2 and 50±20 for wildtype, 9±3 and 56±6 for ΔHS1, and 9±3 and 42±11 for RHS1 mice (Fig. 2A). Thus, there were no obvious differences in early B-cell development in wildtype and mutant mice. However we cannot exclude minor developmental defects not readily detectable by such analyses. Homozygous mutant ΔHSs bone marrow cells were analyzed in a similar fashion, but only Ly9.1+ cells were included in the analysis. Ly9.1 is exclusively expressed on cells derived from the ΔHSs ES cells but not on cells derived from the Rag2-/- blastocyst. The presence of a large compartment of blastocyst derived Rag-deficient pro-B cells in the bone marrow can interfere with development of ES cell derived B-lymphocytes. However, FACS analysis of ΔHSs bone marrow B cells indicated the presence of both pro- and pre-B cells and did not suggest a block in B-cell development (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2
Development of homozygous ΔHS1, RHS1, and ΔHSs lymphocytes.

Next we analyzed spleens for IgM+ B220+ AA4.1+ transitional B-cells and IgM+ B220+ AA4.1- mature B-cells (Fig. 2B). In homozygous RHS1, and homozygous ΔHS1 mice transitional (19.7%–27.5%) and mature (65.3%–72.7%) B-cell compartments similar to wildtype were identified; whereas, in spleens from RDBC chimeras generated from homozygous ΔHSs ES cells strongly reduced numbers of transitional B-cells were observed (6.44%). This reduction in the transitional B-cell compartment compared to the mature B-cell compartment (75%) might be due to overall reduced numbers of developing B cells in the obtained RDBC chimeras and to the accumulation of mature B-cells in the periphery of these mice and not to a defect in B cell development. Finally, we observed normal development of T-lymphocytes in the thymi of wildtype, homozygous RHS1, and homozygous ΔHS1 mice as well as RDBC chimeras generated from homozygous ΔHSs ES cells (Fig. 2C).

The ΔHS1, RHS1, and ΔHSs alleles show no significant defect in V(D)J recombination

The data indicating that HS1 is pro-B cell specific and contains binding sites for the transcription factors PU.1, Pax5, and E2A led to the suggestion that HS1 could be involved in regulation of V(D)J recombination at the IgH locus [9]. We utilized a PCR based assay to assess V(D)J recombination efficiencies in developing lymphocytes from mice with homozygous deletion of HS1. FACS-sorted pro-B cells (IgM- B220+ CD43hi) and pre-B cells (IgM- B220+ CD43lo) from bone marrow and double positive (DP) T-cells (B220- CD4+ CD8+) from thymus were analyzed for D to JH, VH to DJH, Vκ to Jκ and Vλ to Jλ rearrangements. Intensities of PCR bands for DHQ52 to JH (Fig. 3A) and DSP to JH rearrangements (Fig. 3B) were comparable in pro-B cells, pre-B cells, and DP T-cells from wildtype, homozygous RHS1, and homozygous ΔHS1 mice indicating that deletion of the pro-B cell specific HS1 site does not detectably affect the D to JH recombination step. DNA input amounts were normalized to the presence of a genomic sequence within the murine DLG5 gene (Fig. 3H).

Figure 3
V(D)J recombination in ΔHS1 and RHS1 mice.

It was speculated that HS1 might regulate the differential activation of distal versus proximal VH families [9]; therefore, we analyzed the rearrangement efficiencies of the proximal VH7183 family (Fig. 3C), the distal VHJ558 familiy (Fig. 3D), and the distal most VH segment VHJ558.55 (Fig. 3E). We found that pro-B cells and pre-B cells from wildtype, homozygous RHS1, and homozygous ΔHS1 mice rearrange the proximal VH7183 family at similar levels (Fig. 3C). Also, the distal family VHJ558 (Fig. 3D) as well as the distal most VH segment VHJ558.55 (Fig. 3E) rearranged at comparable efficiencies in pro-B cells and pre-B cells from the three different genotypes. VH to DJH recombination was absent in DP T-cells from wildtype, homozygous RHS1, and homozygous ΔHS1 mice as the VH to DJH recombination step is restricted to the B-lineage (Fig 3C, D, E). These data show that HS1 is not necessary for rendering the distal part of the VH cluster accessible and, therefore, suggest that HS1 does not play a major role in regulation of usage or accessibility of distal versus proximal VH families.

Recently, it has been shown that IgH and Igκ loci can colocalize during B-cell development, mainly at the pre-B cell stage, and it was suggested that this colocalization induces decontraction of the IgH locus [14]. We therefore performed an assay to evaluate Igκ (Fig. 3F) and Igλ (Fig. 3G) V(D)J recombination efficiencies. Both Igκ and Igλ loci show similar V(D)J recombination levels in the analyzed developing B cells from wildtype, homozygous RHS1, and homozygous ΔHS1 mice, while light chain rearrangements were absent in DP T-cells from the three different genotypes. Therefore, we conclude that deletion of HS1 does not markedly affect Ig light chain gene rearrangements.

As an independent method to evaluate D to JH and VH to DJH recombination efficiencies, we generated clonal hybridoma lines from splenic B-cells of IgHa/b heterozygous RHS1, ΔHS1 mice carrying the mutant allele in their germline and of RDBC chimeras generated from heterozygous ΔHSs ES cells (Table 1). In each case the IgHa allele was the mutant allele while the IgHb allele was the wildtype allele. In splenic B-cells, one allele exists as a functional VHDJH rearrangement, while the second allele can either be in germline configuration, or it exists as a DJH or an nonproductive VHDJH rearrangement. The rearrangement status of the second IgH allele was assessed by Southern blot analysis. Consequently, hybridomas expressing the mutant IgHa allele can be analyzed for rearrangement efficiency of the wildtype IgHb allele, and vice versa, in hybridomas expressing the wildtype IgHb allele, the rearrangement status of the mutant IgHa allele can be assessed.

Table 1
ΔHS1, RHS1, and ΔHSs hybridoma analysis.

Wildtype B cells undergo D to JH rearrangements on both alleles; but still, consistent with earlier studies, about 5% of hybridomas harbor an IgH allele in germline configuration which presumably originates from tripartite fusions involving non B-cells [12] (not shown). The number of mutant alleles in germline configuration was not increased compared to wildtype indicating that RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs alleles can undergo efficient D to JH recombination (not shown). In 50–60% of wildtype B-cells the nonproductive allele is in DJH configuration; whereas in 40–50% the nonproductive allele is in VHDJH configuration [15]. An increased percentage of DJH alleles could indicate less efficient VH to DJH recombination: in contrast, an increased percentage of VHDJH alleles might indicate a break in allelic exclusion. IgMa expressing hybridomas generated from B-cells heterozygous for RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs were analyzed for their rearrangement status of the wildtype IgMb allele and show ratios of DJH (56%–61%), and VHDJH alleles (39%–44%) in the expected range (Table 1). IgMb expressing hybridomas were analyzed for the rearrangement status of their mutant IgMa allele. RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs alleles do not show significantly increased or decreased (Fisher's exact test) rearrangement ratios compared to wt alleles, as 52%–69% of mutant alleles were in DJH configuration while 31%–48% were in VHDJH configuration.

FACS analysis was performed on B-cells from spleens (Fig. 4A) and bone marrow (Fig. 4B) of RDBC chimeras generated from heterozygous RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs ES cells. IgMa expressing populations, representing the targeted allele, and IgMb expressing populations, representing the wildtype allele, were of similar size both in bone marrow and in spleen from RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs chimeras, suggesting that the RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs alleles can undergo V(D)J recombination at the IgH locus at similar efficiencies as wildtype alleles.

Figure 4
IgMa versus IgMb expression in ΔHS1, RHS1, and ΔHSs B cells.

The ΔHS1, RHS1, and ΔHSs alleles do not affect allelic exclusion

FACS analysis of wt B cells from spleen (Fig. 4A) and bone marrow (Fig. 4B) shows distinct populations of similar size for B cells that are single positive for either IgHa or IgHb, but intact allelic exclusion prevents the appearance of an obvious IgHa, IgHb double producing population. Similarly, RDBC chimeras generated from heterozygous RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs ES cells exhibited IgHa or IgHb single positive B-cell populations of similar size in spleen (Fig. 4A) and bone marrow (Fig. 4B) but no IgHa, IgHb double producing population. These data indicate that the deleted sequences of the targeted alleles do not contain a regulatory element that is necessary for implementation of allelic exclusion. Furthermore, data from hybridoma analysis (Tab. 1) support this notion as in the case of a break in allelic exclusion increased numbers of hybridomas with VH to DJH rearrangements on both alleles would be expected. Such an increase compared to wildtype alleles could not be observed (Tab. 1), which indicates intact allelic exclusion of RHS1, ΔHS1, and ΔHSs alleles.

The 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites are not required for efficient class switch recombination

To assess a potential effect of the 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites on CSR, B-cells were stimulated to undergo CSR and analyzed by FACS (Fig. 5). Stimulation with LPS induces IgH isotype switching to γ3, while stimulation with IL4+ αCD40 promotes switching to γ1. B-cells from AID-/- mice served as negative controls, while wildtype B-cells represented a positive control and therefore switched to the appropriate isotypes under LPS or IL4+ αCD40 stimulation. CSR in homozygous ΔHSs B-cells occurs at similar levels as in wildtype B-cells implying that the cluster of 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites is not required for efficient CSR to γ1 (Fig. 5A) and γ3 (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5
Ig class switch recombination in absence of the 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites.

Complex phenotypes without an obvious relation to the IgH locus in ΔHS1 mice

We performed targeted deletion experiments of the 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites to test their suggested function in IgH locus regulation. So far no major IgH related phenotype was identified. However, about 20% of homozygous ΔHS1 mice develop a complex neurological phenotype and die at 3–5 weeks of age, likely due to a lack of food intake. These mice exhibit an abnormal limp grasping phenotype, i.e. mice clasp their front and hind feet almost immediately upon being lifted by their tail (Fig. 6A, B). Furthermore these mice develop a hydrocephalus, which is already visible at about one week of age and is enlarged over the following weeks (Fig. 6C, D). Histological analysis confirmed the presence of a hydrocephalus, revealed abnormal hindbrain development, and revealed retinal abnormalities (Fig. 6E, F, G). The wildtype retina is organized in a delicate layer system (Fig. 6E): stratum opticum and ganglionic layer (1), inner plexiform layer (2), inner nuclear layer (3), outer plexiform layer (4), outer nuclear layer (5), layer of rods and cones (6), pigment layer (7). In the ΔHS1 mutant mice, the organization of retinal layers is impaired in such a way that nuclei from the outer nuclear layer are aberrantly located in the layer of rods and cones (Fig. 6F). In some more severe cases rosette formation in the outer nuclear layer is evident (Fig. 6G). Currently, we do not know what causes these phenotypes, but we exclude that this phenotype is caused by a second integration of the targeting vector at an undefined site in the genome (Figure S1). The deletion in the ΔHS1 allele deletes 340 bp within intron 1 of Zfp386. Therefore, misregulation of that poorly described gene might cause the described phenotypes although other possibilities are conceivable.

Figure 6
Complex phenotypes of homozygous ΔHS1 mice.


This study aimed for elucidating the potential regulatory functions of a cluster of recently described DNaseI hypersensitive sites at the 5′ end of the IgH locus [9]. We performed targeted deletion of either the pro-B cell specific site HS1 (ΔHS1) or deletion of the entire cluster of hypersensitive sites (ΔHSs) in mice or in their lymphocytes, respectively. A potential regulatory element at the 5′end of the IgH locus was speculated to regulate processes such as IgH allelic exclusion, VH germline transcription, differential accessibility or usage of distal versus proximal VH gene families. Furthermore, it was suggested that the 5′end of the IgH locus might play a role in positioning the IgH locus in distinct subnuclear compartments [16], [17], [18], and it was suggested to harbor insulator or boundary capacity [19].

B- and T-lymphocytes homozygous for the ΔHS1, RHS1, and ΔHSs alleles appear to proceed through lymphocyte development in an unimpaired way. Data from RDBC chimeras generated from heterozygous ΔHS1, RHS1, and ΔHSs ES cells indicated that allelic exclusion is not affected in mutant B-cells and that mutant IgH alleles can undergo efficient V(D)J recombination of their IgH locus. Furthermore, data from PCR assays to analyze V(D)J recombination efficiency in mice with HS1 deleted on both alleles supports the notion that HS1 is not necessary for neither the D to JH nor the VH to DJH recombination step. Both proximal and distal VH families as well as the distal most VH segment VHJ558.55 rearrange as efficiently as on wildtype alleles. Similarly, IgL loci in HS1 deleted B-cells rearrange at the same efficiency as wildtype IgL loci. Analysis of IgH V(D)J rearrangement status in hybridomas generated from heterozygous ΔHS1, RHS1, and ΔHSs B-cells also strengthens the idea that the deleted DNAseI hypersensitive sites would not regulate IgH V(D)J recombination. We tested for potential alterations associated with DNA end processing during V(D)J recombination by examining the CDR3 sequence obtained from homozygous ΔHS1 B cells and found a distribution in length that was similar to wildtype B cells [20] (Figure S2).

We tested a potential effect of the cluster of DNaseI hypersensitive site on the process of IgH CSR. Assaying class switching upon different in vitro stimulations in wildtype and homozygous ΔHSs B-cells let us conclude that the cluster of 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites does not play a crucial role in CSR.

The only observed phenotypes so far occurred in homozygous ΔHS1 mice and seem to be independent of the IgH locus. ΔHS1 mice show abnormal limp grasping indicating a neurological abnormality, ΔHS1 mice can develop severe hydrocephalus and exhibit retinal impairments. A possible explanation for these phenotypes is a potential defect in regulation of the zinc finger protein Zfp386. ΔHS1 deletes a 340 bp region from intron 1 of Zfp386 which might result in different splice forms, impaired expression levels, or expression patterns of this gene.

Overall, our analysis of the deletion of the pro-B cell specific site HS1 or the whole cluster of 5′IgH DNaseI hypersensitive sites did not support the existence of a cis-regulatory function of these elements regarding the IgH locus.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Single integration of the RHS1 targeting vector. The targeting vector (targeting vector RHS1), the targeted locus (RHS1), and the wildtype (wt) IgH locus with its 5′ flanking region are shown. VH, DH, JH indicate representative IgH V, D, and J segments. Exons 1, 2, and 3 of Zfp386 are shown as grey rectangles, DNaseI hypersensitive sites HS1, HS2, HS3a, and HS3b are shown as black ovals, the NeoR specific Southern probe as a black rectangle. X - XbaI. Southern analysis of XbaI digested genomic DNA from the targeted RHS1 clones 5 (lane 1) and 23 (lane 2) utilizing the NeoR specific probe shows a single 16.0 kb band. No bands are visible from untargeted wildtype ES cell DNA (lane 3). M - Fermentas 1 kb ladder.

(0.17 MB TIF)

Figure S2

CDR3 length in ΔHS1 B cells. Peripheral B cells were isolated from one ΔHS1 mouse and a wildtype mouse and amplified for V558-JH4 rearrangements. Heavy Chain CDR3 lengths were calculated as the number of nucleotides between the consensus Cys residue and the Trp residue. 23 individual sequences were analyzed from ΔHS1 B cells and 10 from wildtype.

(0.05 MB PDF)

Table S1

(0.08 MB DOCX)


We thank Drs. Meinrad Busslinger, Thomas Decker, Andrew Franklin, Cosmas Giallourakis, Gang Li, Raul Mostoslavsky, Sheila Ranganath, Jing Wang, and Shan Zha for helpful discussions, Lisa Acquaviva and Aimee Williams for mouse work, and Natasha Barteneva for cell sorting.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was funded by National Institutes of Health R01 AI020047 (to FWA) and GM36064 (to PHB). FWA is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Perlot T, Alt FW. Cis-regulatory elements and epigenetic changes control genomic rearrangements of the IgH locus. Adv Immunol. 2008;99:1–32. [PubMed]
2. Alt FW, Yancopoulos GD, Blackwell TK, Wood C, Thomas E, et al. Ordered rearrangement of immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region segments. EMBO J. 1984;3:1209–1219. [PubMed]
3. Chowdhury D, Sen R. Stepwise activation of the immunoglobulin mu heavy chain gene locus. EMBO J. 2001;20:6394–6403. [PubMed]
4. Jung D, Giallourakis C, Mostoslavsky R, Alt FW. Mechanism and control of V(D)J recombination at the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:541–570. [PubMed]
5. Chaudhuri J, Basu U, Zarrin A, Yan C, Franco S, et al. Evolution of the immunoglobulin heavy chain class switch recombination mechanism. Adv Immunol. 2007;94:157–214. [PubMed]
6. Sakai E, Bottaro A, Davidson L, Sleckman BP, Alt FW. Recombination and transcription of the endogenous Ig heavy chain locus is effected by the Ig heavy chain intronic enhancer core region in the absence of the matrix attachment regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:1526–1531. [PubMed]
7. Perlot T, Alt FW, Bassing CH, Suh H, Pinaud E. Elucidation of IgH intronic enhancer functions via germ-line deletion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14362–14367. [PubMed]
8. Khamlichi AA, Pinaud E, Decourt C, Chauveau C, Cogne M. The 3′ IgH regulatory region: a complex structure in a search for a function. Adv Immunol. 2000;75:317–345. [PubMed]
9. Pawlitzky I, Angeles CV, Siegel AM, Stanton ML, Riblet R, et al. Identification of a candidate regulatory element within the 5′ flanking region of the mouse Igh locus defined by pro-B cell-specific hypersensitivity associated with binding of PU.1, Pax5, and E2A. J Immunol. 2006;176:6839–6851. [PubMed]
10. Sleckman BP, Bardon CG, Ferrini R, Davidson L, Alt FW. Function of the TCR alpha enhancer in alphabeta and gammadelta T cells. Immunity. 1997;7:505–515. [PubMed]
11. Chen J, Lansford R, Stewart V, Young F, Alt FW. RAG-2-deficient blastocyst complementation: an assay of gene function in lymphocyte development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:4528–4532. [PubMed]
12. Dudley DD, Sekiguchi J, Zhu C, Sadofsky MJ, Whitlow S, et al. Impaired V(D)J recombination and lymphocyte development in core RAG1-expressing mice. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1439–1450. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Franco S, Gostissa M, Zha S, Lombard DB, Murphy MM, et al. H2AX prevents DNA breaks from progressing to chromosome breaks and translocations. Mol Cell. 2006;21:201–214. [PubMed]
14. Hewitt SL, Farmer D, Marszalek K, Cadera E, Liang HE, et al. Association between the Igk and Igh immunoglobulin loci mediated by the 3′ Igk enhancer induces ‘decontraction’ of the Igh locus in pre-B cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:396–404. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Mostoslavsky R, Alt FW, Rajewsky K. The lingering enigma of the allelic exclusion mechanism. Cell. 2004;118:539–544. [PubMed]
16. Kosak ST, Skok JA, Medina KL, Riblet R, Le Beau MM, et al. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science. 2002;296:158–162. [PubMed]
17. Fuxa M, Skok J, Souabni A, Salvagiotto G, Roldan E, et al. Pax5 induces V-to-DJ rearrangements and locus contraction of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene. Genes Dev. 2004;18:411–422. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Yang Q, Riblet R, Schildkraut CL. Sites that direct nuclear compartmentalization are near the 5′ end of the mouse immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:6021–6030. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Reddy KL, Zullo JM, Bertolino E, Singh H. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature. 2008;452:243–247. [PubMed]
20. Jolly CJ, Klix N, Neuberger MS. Rapid methods for the analysis of immunoglobulin gene hypermutation: application to transgenic and gene targeted mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(10):1913–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science