PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Transplant Proc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 9.
Published in final edited form as:
Transplant Proc. 1999 November; 31(7A): 29S–30S.
PMCID: PMC2976502
NIHMSID: NIHMS246765

Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression in Pediatric Renal Transplantation

Tacrolimus has been shown to be a safe and effective immunosuppressive agent in adult renal transplantation with significant advantages, including the ability to taper corticosteroids in up to 65% of recipients.14 The use of this agent in the pediatric population is less well described. We and others have previously reported that its use in pediatric patients is associated with excellent patient and graft survival results in a relatively small number of patients.59 Here we report our expanded experience on the use of tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1989 and December 1996, 82 pediatric renal transplants were performed using tacrolimus-based immunosuppression without antilymphocyte antibody induction therapy. The mean age of the recipients was 10.6 ± 5.2 years (range 0.7 to 17.9 years). More than one-quarter of patients could be categorized as ‘high-risk’ with 18 (22%) cases being retransplantations and 6 (7%) patients having panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels ≥40%. A total of 34 (41%) cases were with living donors and 48 (59%) were with cadaveric donors, with a mean donor age of 27.3 ± 14.6 years (range 0.7 to 50 years), and a mean cold ischemia time in the cadaveric cases of 26.5 ± 8.8 hours. The mean number of HLA matches and mismatches was 2.8 ± 1.2 and 2.9 ± 1.3. respectively, and there were five (6%) O-antigen mismatches. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.0 ± 0.2 years (range 0.6 to 7.5 years). Immunosuppression consisted of a 0.15 mg/kg oral dose of tacrolimus preoperatively, with postoperative administration at 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg as a continuous intravenous infusion. Patients were subsequently converted to oral administration of tacrolimus at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg twice daily. The dose of tacrolimus was adjusted according to target whole blood trough levels. The levels aimed for were 20 to 25 ng/mL during the first 2 weeks, 15 to 20 ng/mL at 1 month, 10 to 15 ng/mL at 3 months, and <5 to 8 to 9 ng/mL over the long term. Patients also received tapered corticosteroid therapy, the aim being to withdraw corticosteroids completely by month 6.

RESULTS

One- and 4-year actuarial patient survival was 99% and 94%, and actuarial graft survival was 98% and 84%, respectively (Table 1). There was no significant difference in patient and graft survival between the living donor and cadaveric donor recipients. However, 4-year graft survival was significantly higher in patients receiving a primary transplant compared with retransplant patients (P < .02). PRA levels were also a prognostic indicator of graft survival, with 87% 4-year survival in those with levels <40% and 57% in patients with levels ≥40% (P < .03). Causes of graft loss included rejection (n = 5), disease recurrence (n = 5), pancreatitis (n = 2), infection (n = 1), and noncompliance (n = 1).

Table 1
One- and 4-Year Patient and Graft Survival Rates in Tacrolimus-Treated Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients

The mean serum creatinine level was 1.1 ± 0.5 mg/dL, and the corresponding calculated creatinine clearance was 88 ± 25 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Overall, prednisone was withdrawn in 66% of successfully transplanted patients at the 4-year follow-up time point. The mean dose of tacrolimus at this time was 0.18 ± 0.12 mg/kg/d, with mean levels of 9.9 ± 4.6 ng/mL. The overall dose of corticosteroids was 0.04 ± 0.09 mg/kg/d, while the mean dose in patients remaining on corticosteroids was 0.17 ± 0.11 mg/kg/d. In the corticosteroid-free children, the mean standard deviation height scores (Z score) at the time of transplantation, and at 1 and 4 years, were −2.3 ± 2.0, −1.7 ± 1.0, and +0.36 ± 1.5, respectively, showing an improvement over time with corticosteroid dose reduction and subsequent withdrawal. In those remaining on corticosteroids, the mean Z scores at 1 and 4 years were −2.0 ± 1.1 and −0.6 ± 2.9, respectively. Furthermore, 86% of the successfully transplanted patients were not taking any antihypertensive medications. Mean cholesterol levels were also within the acceptable range, at 155 ± 31 mg/dL.

Incidence of Rejection

Although the overall incidence of acute rejection was 44%, there was a clear reduction in rejection episodes over time as greater experience was gained in the use of tacrolimus. Between December 1989 and December 1993, the incidence of acute rejection was 63%, but was significantly reduced to 23% (P = .0003) between January 1994 and December 1996. The incidence of both corticosteroid-resistant rejection and delayed graft function was 5%. A total of 2% of patients with delayed graft function required dialysis within 1 week of transplantation.

Infection

The overall incidence of cytomegalovirus infection (CMV) was 13%. Again, a decreased incidence of CMV was observed over time, with 17% of patients being affected between December 1989 and December 1992, which was reduced to 12% during the subsequent 4 years.

DISCUSSION

There has been relatively little experience with the use of tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation including reports from our own institution58,10 as well as the University of Minnesota11 and Johns Hopkins Hospital9 describing excellent patient and graft survival results in the short term. We currently report patient and graft survival results of 99% and 94% after 1 year and 98% and 84% after 4 years, with excellent renal function and the ability to taper corticosteroids in the majority of children. One concern with the use of tacrolimus in children has been the relatively high incidence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) which in the early part of this series was 17% (December 1989 to December 1992, 5 cases in 29 patients). However, in the latter part of this series (January 1993 to December 1996) the incidence had decreased to 4% (2 cases in 53 patients). All of these cases responded to temporary discontinuation of immunosuppression and intravenous ganciclovir and there were no deaths or short-term graft losses. One patient lost the allograft because of chronic rejection 3 years after being treated for PTLD. This indicates that there is a learning curve associated with the use of tacrolimus in the pediatric population. In EBV mismatched recipients we are currently following serial EBV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) levels to allow early identification and the use of ganciclovir treatment in seroconverting children. In addition, we have become more judicious in the early reduction of tacrolimus levels in the postoperative period in this group of patients. We feel that these factors have led to the observed reduction in the incidence of PTLD in the latter part of our series. The early incidence of insulin-dependent posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) was 9% in successfully transplanted patients, but with reduction of tacrolimus doses and corticosteroid tapering the final incidence was only 1%. The significant benefits in this series have been the gratifying improvements in growth as reflected by improved mean standard deviation height scores in children who were able to be weaned off corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate the efficacy of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplant recipients, with reasonable patient and graft survival, routine achievement of corticosteroid and antihypertensive medication withdrawal, and gratifying increases in growth.

REFERENCES

1. Shapiro R, Jordan ML, Scantlebury V, et al. Transplantation. 1995;59:485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Starzl TE, Fung J, Jordan ML, et al. JAMA. 1990;264:63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Pirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH, et al. Transplantation. 1997;63:977. [PubMed]
4. Mayer AD, Dmitrewski J, Squifflet J, et al. Transplantation. 1997;64:436. [PubMed]
5. Schneck FX, Jordan ML, Jensen CWB, et al. J Urol. 1992;147:1585. [PubMed]
6. Ellis D, Shapiro R, Jordan ML, et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 1994;8:193. [PubMed]
7. Shapiro R, Scantlebury V, Jordan ML, et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995;9:543. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Shapiro R, Scantlebury V, Jordan ML, et al. Transplantation. 1996;62:1752. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. McKee M, Segev D, Wise B, et al. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32:688. [PubMed]
10. Shapiro R, Scantlebury V, Jordan ML, et al. Transplantation. 1999;67:299. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Birk PE, Cook MD, Schmidt WJ, et al. Transplant Proc. 1996;28:993. [PubMed]