PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Transplant Proc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 9.
Published in final edited form as:
Transplant Proc. 1990 October; 22(5): 2361–2365.
PMCID: PMC2975983
NIHMSID: NIHMS242963

Long-Term (25-Year) Survival After Renal Homotransplantation—The World Experience

At the beginning of 1962, renal transplantation, except with an identical twin donor, was not a promising means of treatment. Total body irradiation1,2 6-mercaptopurine,36 its analogue, azathioprine7 and steroids8 had been shown in dogs and/or rodents to have immunosuppressive qualities, but prolonged survival of skin or kidney grafts in experimental animals was a relatively uncommon achievement. Similarly, the first clinical trials with these agents, alone or in combination, had been almost universally unsuccessful.914

METHODS

It was known from our own unpublished canine experiments that steroids and azathioprine had synergistic immunosuppressive effects. As it turned out, this kind of multimodality therapy allowed the prevention or reversal of rejection of renal homografts in most clinical cases.15 Consequently, an extensive and encouraging clinical experience (Table 1) with 64 patients was quickly acquired at the University of Colorado.16 Forty-six patients were given kidneys from blood relatives other than identical twins. The other 18 received kidneys from nonrelated volunteer donors. Fifteen of the recipients survived for 25 years and 14 are still living after 25½ to 27 years. These long-surviving recipients are the principal basis of this report.

Table 1
Living Donor Renal Transplants From November 1962 to March 1964

In addition, with the help of colleagues at 6 other centers which were active in these early years, 9 more patients have been found who have survived to date after treatment with renal homotransplantation during this same time frame.

RESULTS

Forty-Six Recipients of Living Related Kidneys

Fourteen (30%) of 46 recipients of living related kidneys in the original University of Colorado series are still alive after 25½ to 27 years (Table 2). The 25-year survival rate in this group was 15/46 (33%), but one of the patients died after 25.3 years with function of his original maternal graft (Cr 2.0 mg %). Ten of the 14 survivors have their original grafts (Table 2), and all have serum creatinines less than 2 mg%.

Table 2
Fourteen Surviving Patients From 1962 to 1964 (March) Series

Recipients of Sibling Kidneys

Only 3 (13%) of the 23 recipients of sibling kidneys are alive (Table 1). They have good function of their original transplants, the first two of which are the longest surviving homografts in the world. These 3 patients are males. Their grafts were placed on 31 January 1963 (from a sister), 9 February 1963 (brother), and 15 January 1964 (sister) (Table 2). The first of these recipients was A blood type and received a B kidney, a blood group incompatibility that is generally avoided today. The last 2 of the 3 surviving recipients stopped all therapy 25 and 23 years ago because of mental illness and religious convictions respectively. Renal function has been perfect throughout. Why treatment could be stopped permanently is not known. Noncompliance of this kind often has been described in the literature as an important cause of graft loss.

Recipients of Parental Kidneys

Nine (45%) of the 20 recipients of parental kidneys are alive (Table 1) and 5 still have adequate function of their original grafts. Two more have undergone successful retransplantation with related donors and two are on dialysis (Table 2).

Recipients of Grafts From an Aunt, Uncle, and Cousin

One graft from an aunt and one from an uncle are still functioning well (Tables 1 and and2).2). A kidney from a second cousin was chronically rejected after 15 years and the recipient died not long after.

Pediatric Vs Adult Recipients of Related Grafts

Of 16 patients who were 18 years-old or younger at the time of transplantation, 10 (63%) are still alive, 8 are dialysis free, and 6 have good function of their original grafts (Table 3). In contrast, only 4 (13%) of 30 adults are alive, all with function of their original grafts of which 3 were from siblings, and the other from a parental donor.

Table 3
Pediatric Versus Adult Recipients in 46 Related Transplantations

Because of the disproportionately high 25-year survival observed in infants and pediatric recipients, all 16 cases were examined retrospectively (Table 4). Four of the 6 deaths occurred early from 1 to 201 days after transplantation. Only 2 more deaths occurred in the next 25 years.

Table 4
Outcome of Pediatric Recipients Treated From November 24,1962 to March 23, 1964, Follow-up to September 1,1989

Eighteen Colorado Recipients of Nonrelated Volunteer Kidneys

None of these patients are alive (Table 1). The longest kidney survival was 16⅔ years (LD63) and the longest patient survival (LD54) was 24.8 years (Table 5).

Table 5
Causes of 12 Deaths That Occurred After 10 Years

Causes of Late Death in the Colorado Series

At the end of 10 years, 24 (52.2%) of the 46 patients given living related kidneys, and 2 (11.1%) of 18 recipients of nonrelated kidneys were still alive. Twelve of these 26 survivors died subsequently for reasons summarized in Table 5. Heart disease from coronary arteriosclerosis and cancer (4 examples each), were the principal reasons for the late deaths. Two patients stopped immunosuppression in what may have been covert suicides. They rejected their kidneys, and died of inadequately treated renal failure. Another patient with perfect renal function 17.7 years posttransplantation committed suicide with carbon monoxide inhalation. One patient developed chronic active hepatitis and died of liver failure 10.6 years posttransplantation.

It was particularly distressing to have 3 patients die a few months before or just after the twenty-fifth anniversary of their transplantation. Two of these patients (LD6 and LD37) still had life supporting although subnormal renal function. One (LD6) was under consideration for heart transplantation and kidney retransplantation.

Survivors From Other Centers Before 31 March 1964

Nine additional survivors from this early era of renal transplantation are being followed in 6 centers (Table 6), 4 in the United States and 2 in Europe. All 9 were recipients of kidneys from blood relatives. In 7 of the 9 cases, the original grafts are still functioning. In the other 2, retransplantation many years later has made or kept the patients dialysis free; these patients who were treated in Paris (1962) and Edinburgh (1962) are the longest survivors in the world.

Table 6
Nine Other Non-Twin Recipients From Before March 31, 1984

DISCUSSION

There are no patients left from the era preceding 1962 in which immunosuppression was with total body irradiation. However, the long survival of two fraternal twin recipients from this earlier time provided an exceptional incentive for continuing efforts during an otherwise bleak period. The first of these twins whose operation was in Boston on 24 January 1959,11,12,17 died in August 1979 of arteriosclerotic heart disease (personal communication, Dr Robert Kirkman, August 1989). The second fraternal twin underwent transplantation in Paris on 29 June 1959,18 and died on 13 July 1985 of carcinoma of the bladder (personal communication, Dr Henri Kreis, August 1989).

The subsequent wave of successes that began in 1962 was made possible by the availability of azathioprine and by its combination with prednisone. March of 1964 was a natural demarcation point defining the end of this remarkable new phase. The cases compiled to that time at the University of Colorado provided the basis for the first textbook on renal transplantation.16 In addition, this same time frame was used for a collection of all 342 renal homotransplantations done in the world up to March 1964.19 This latter extraordinary labor of love had been undertaken by the great transplantation pioneer, Dr Joseph E. Murray of Boston, following a meeting on 26 and 27 September 1963 in Washington DC of about 20 early workers (surgeons, physicians, and pathologists) in this embryonal new specialty. The meeting was sponsored by the National Research Council and the National Academy of Science.

Almost all of the survivors in the world at the time of the September 1963 meeting and up through the following March were treated at the same centers in Boston, Cleveland, Denver, Edinburgh, Minneapolis, Paris, and Richmond where more than 25 years later the residual group of patients can be found today. Late reports from most of these centers have been published2027 but not for a number of years. The presence of these survivors continues to justify an effort which once was perceived by many as the height of folly.28

Ever since 1964, there was a growing uneasiness in the University of Colorado team about our dependence on living related donors; this is a concern which continues to haunt us to the present day. In addition, the failure to do better at the end of our 24-month trial than at the beginning of it had already convinced us that fundamental improvements in tissue matching, in immunosuppression, or both would be necessary before renal transplantation would be truly practical. Consequently, a moratorium on renal transplantation was declared at the University of Colorado from March 1964 until the following October. When efforts were resumed, they included the first trial (with Dr Paul Terasaki at the University of California, Los Angeles) of prospective tissue matching.29

By 1964 it became evident that the quality of life provided by nonrelated kidneys was inferior to that provided under the same conditions by living-related donor transplants. Furthermore, progress in the results of cadaver donor renal allografts appeared to be a clear prerequisite to extension of clinical transplantation to nonrenal organs, which uniformly require cadaveric donors. It is worthy of note that none of the world’s currently surviving 23 long-term recipients was given an unrelated donor kidney. The longest continuous function of an unrelated kidney allograft in the University of Colorado series was 16.7 years. There is no report, as yet, in the world of a 25-year survival of a cadaveric kidney allograft, although a recipient in Paris who has maintained perfect renal function is expected to breach this barrier on 12 October 1989 (personal communication, Dr Henri Kreis, August 1989). This female recipient was 31 years-old at the time of her transplantation in 1964.

A disquieting note in this series of patients is the continuing late mortality, which appears to bear no relationship to the organ source. In the University of Colorado series. 12 of the 26 patients alive at 10 years24 died subsequently. The higher rate of cancer seems to be related to chronic immunosuppression as was predicted from the beginning of this experience.30 Cardiovascular disease seen in these patients may also have been a consequence of chronic immunosuppression, and particularly of the use of steroids. It is of interest in this regard that the two patients who stopped their own immunosuppression more than 20 years ago remain free of these complications. These recipients have behaved almost as identical twin recipients studied during this era. Less than complete satisfaction with the outcome of transplantation may be inferred from the suicide of one patient and the occult suicide of 2 other subjects, who refused to return to chronic dialysis after their kidney grafts had failed.

At the time, the results observed during this era ending in March 1964 were considered revolutionary. A new field was deemed to have been opened with staggering scientific and social ramifications. The follow-up provided in this report is less of a justification of the technology then available than a sobering description of its limitations. The treatment options available today continue to have many of the same risk factors for truly long survival as the methods of 25 years ago. The results provide a stark warning against complacency regarding what we have to offer to transplant recipients today.

SUMMARY

A follow-up is provided for 64 patients treated with renal transplantation at the University of Colorado before 31 March 1964. The 25-year survival was 15/64 (23.4%) and 14 patients (22%) are still alive after 25½ to 27 years. There are 9 other survivors in the world from this era, distributed in 4 American and 2 European centers. All of the 25-year survivors received their grafts from living related donors.

Acknowledgments

Supported by research grants from the Veterans Administration and Project Grant No. DK 29961 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

References

1. Dempster WJ, Lennox B, Boag JW. Br J Exp Pathol. 1950;31:670. [PubMed]
2. Lindsley DL, Odell TT, Jr, Tausche FG. Proc Soc Exp Biol. 1955;90:512. [PubMed]
3. Schwartz R, Dameshek W. Nature. 1959;183:168.
4. Calne RY. Lancet. 1960;1:417. [PubMed]
5. Zukoski CF, Lee HM, Hume DM. Surg Forum. 1960;11:470. [PubMed]
6. Pierce JC, Varco RL. Lancet. 1962;1:781. [PubMed]
7. Calne RY, Murray JE. Surg Forum. 1961;12:118. [PubMed]
8. Billingham RE, Krohn PL, Medawar PB. Br Med J. 1951;1:1157. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Goodwin WE, Martin DC. Urol Survey. 1963;13:229. [PubMed]
10. Groth CG. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972;134:323. [PubMed]
11. Murray JE, Merrill JP, Dammin GJ, et al. Surgery. 1960;48:272. [PubMed]
12. Murray JE, Merrill JP, Dammin GJ, et al. Ann Surg. 1962;156:337. [PubMed]
13. Murray JE, Merrill JP, Harrison JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 1963;268:1315. [PubMed]
14. Woodruff MFA, Robson JS, Nolan B, et al. Lancet. 1963;2:675. [PubMed]
15. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Waddell WR. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;117:385. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Starzl TE. Experience in Renal Transplantation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1964.
17. Merrill JP, Murray JE, Harrison JH, et al. New Engl J Med. 1960;262:1251.
18. Hamburger J, Vaysse J, Crosnier J, et al. Presse Med. 1959;67:1771.
19. Murray JE, Gleason R, Bartholomay A. Transplantation. 1964;2:660. [PubMed]
20. Murray JE, Wilson RE, O’Connor NE. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967;124:124.
21. Kirkman RL, Strom TB, Weir MR, Tilney NL. Transplantation. 1982;34:347. [PubMed]
22. Woodruff MFA, Nolan B, Anderton JL, et al. Br J Surg. 1976;63:85. [PubMed]
23. Starzl TE, Porter KA, Halgrimson CG, et al. Ann Surg. 1974;180:606. [PubMed]
24. Starzl TE, Weil R, Putnam CW, Koep LJ. Transplant Proc. 1977;9:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Thomas F, Lee HM, Wolf JS, et al. Transplant Proc. 1975;7:707.
26. Braun WE, Crile G, Jr, Straffon RA, et al. Transplant Proc. 1975;12(Suppl 1):715.
27. Kelly WD, Lillehei R, Aust JB, et al. Surgery. 1967;62:704. [PubMed]
28. Elkinton JR. Ann Int Med. 1964;60:309. [PubMed]
29. Terasaki PI, Vredevoe DL, Mickey MR, et al. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1966;129:500. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Starzl TB, Penn I, Putnam CW, et al. Transplantation Review. 1971;7:112. [PMC free article] [PubMed]