PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Transplant Proc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 8.
Published in final edited form as:
Transplant Proc. 1996 April; 28(2): 696–697.
PMCID: PMC2975611
NIHMSID: NIHMS244607

Pretreatment of Recipients (Nude Rat) With Donor Antigens Leads to Prolonged Survival of Hamster Heart Xenografts

The initial barrier to successful organ xenotransplantation in discordant species is hyperacute rejection (HAR) mediated by either natural (preformed) or induced antibodies.1,2 Hamster cardiac xenografts are normally rejected by this mechanism within 3 days when transplanted into naive LEW or athymic (nude) rats,3 which in the latter is supposedly caused by a T-cell independent process. This is contrary to the prevailing tenet that dictates that T-cell help is required for the initiation of HAR following presensitization with xenoantigens. Accordingly, we hypothesized that prior exposure of T-cell-deficient nude rats to donor antigens would not precipitate HAR of a subsequently transplanted hamster heart. This study was therefore designed to test this hypothesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Syrian hamsters and NIH athymic nude (mu/mu) rats were used as donors and recipients, respectively. Naive LEW rats were used as immunocompetent controls. LEW as well as nude rat recipients were pretreated with either heparinized hamster whole blood (donor-specific transfusion [DST]; 1 mL, IV) or a suspension of minced hamster heart (MH, IP) 7 days prior to heterotopic cardiac (hamster → rat) xenotransplantation. The production of xenoantibodies was determined in serum samples of the recipients by a two-step complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay (CDC). The quantity of both rat IgM and IgG was measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the details of which are described elsewhere.4 Additionally, donor-specific IgM and IgG were also quantified using an ELISA method described previously by Platt et al5 with several modifications.6

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Although challenge hamster hearts underwent HAR (<10 minutes) when transplanted into presensitized LEW recipients, they nevertheless enjoyed prolonged survival (median of >100 days; group V, Table 1) when transplanted into presensitized nude rats. Furthermore, the loss of heart xenografts due to HAR in naive LEW (but not nude) rats presensitized with donor antigens was associated with marked elevation of donor-specific antibodies (IgM) in the recipient’s serum when tested on the day of grafting (groups II and III). Repetition of CDC assays 7 days postcardiac transplantation revealed a minimal elevation of rat α hamster antibodies (groups V and VI), which was appreciably lower than that observed in a similarly treated immunocompetent rat. In light of these observations, it is tempting to speculate that prior infusion of donor-specific xenoantigens into nude rats with inherently deficient T-dependent immune responses may lead to prolonged survival of a subsequently transplanted xenograft. The precise explication of the role of T-cell-independent humoral responses in the development of HAR may allow us to contrive an approach to attenuate or abrogate this response for successful xenotransplantation.

Table 1
Survival of Hamster Cardiac Xenografts in Sensitized Nude and LEW Rats and the Quantification of Rat Anti-Hamster IgM in the Serum of Variably Treated Nude Rat Recipients

Acknowledgments

Supported by grant DK29961 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

References

1. Aksentijevich I, Sachs DH, Sykes M. J Immunol. 1991;147:4140. [PubMed]
2. Platt JL, Lindman BJ, Geller RL, et al. Transplantation. 1991;52:1037. [PubMed]
3. Valdivia LA, Monden M, Gotoh M, et al. Transplantation. 1990;50:132. [PubMed]
4. Tamura K, Woo J, Bakri MT, et al. Immunology. 1993;79:587. [PubMed]
5. Platt J, Turman M, Noreen H, et al. Transplantation. 1990;49:1000. [PubMed]
6. Vanhove B, Bach F. Transplantation. 1993;56:1251. [PubMed]