PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Fam Pract. Author manuscript; available in PMC Nov 5, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
J Fam Pract. Mar 2008; 57(3): 170–E3.
PMCID: PMC2974565
NIHMSID: NIHMS229404
Getting patients to exercise more: A systematic review of underserved populations
Jennifer K. Carroll, MD, MPH, Kevin Fiscella, MD, MPH, Ronald M. Epstein, MD, Pascal Jean-Pierre, PhD, Colmar Figueroa-Moseley, PhD, Geoffrey C. Williams, MD, PhD, Karen M. Mustian, PhD, and Gary R. Morrow, PhD, MS
University of Rochester Cancer Center (JC, KF, RE, PJP, CFM, KM, GM), Department of Family Medicine (JC, KF, RE, PJP), Department of Internal Medicine (GW), Department of Psychiatry (RE), and Department of Community and Preventive Medicine (KF)
Correspondence Jennifer Carroll, MD, MPH, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Family Medicine Research Programs, 1381 South Avenue, Rochester, NY 14620; jennifer_carroll/at/urmc.rochester.edu
Fewer than half of all Americans get sufficient physical activity, defined as 30 minutes or more per day, at least 5 times per week.1 The need to increase physical activity applies particularly to underserved populations: they are even less likely to get enough physical activity, and are thus even more likely to suffer greater burden of disease.2,3
The purpose of this systematic review is to assess clinical trials of clinician-initiated counseling interventions to promote physical activity in underserved populations. We define underserved populations as individuals from minority ethnic backgrounds (such as African Americans, Hispanics, and Asian Americans), or vulnerable populations such as persons with low educational attainment, low income, lack of insurance, or those residing in rural communities.
Primary care physicians can have a significant impact on their patients’ physical activity. Individuals with a regular primary care physician are more likely to report attempts to change their physical activity habits.4 However, underserved populations are more likely to have inconsistent access to medical care, which may contribute to their greater risk of conditions linked to inadequate physical activity, such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity.
Only about 25% of patients in primary care settings report receiving any counseling on physical activity.5 Those who are middle-aged or have a baccalaureate degree or higher are more likely to report such advice; African Americans and foreign-born immigrants are less likely to report it.
A study by Taira et al6 examined the relationship between patient income and discussion of health risk behaviors. Low-income patients were more likely to be obese and smoke than high-income patients; however, physicians were less likely to discuss diet and exercise with these patients. Among all the patients with whom some discussion occurred in this study, low-income patients were much more likely to attempt to change behavior based on physician advice than were high-income patients.
Clinical trials within7,8 and outside the US911 support the potential value of physical activity counseling in primary care settings. In these studies, as little as 3 to 5 minutes of patient-clinician communication about physical activity was linked to short-term improvement in patients’ exercise habits. As few as 2 or 3 office visits over a 6-month period were associated with increases in patients’ physical activity levels up to 1 year later. Other features of these trials that contributed to their success include having a brief (<3 minutes) counseling component for clinicians, supplementing the counseling with a written exercise prescription, having follow-up contact, and tailoring the counseling to patients’ needs and concerns.
These results are promising for primary care clinicians, whose longitudinal relationships with their patients afford them repeated opportunities to intervene to promote physical activity.
A review by Taylor et al2 of physical activity interventions in low-income, ethnic minority, or disabled populations identified 14 community-based studies, mostly with quasi-experimental “pre/post” study designs. Ten studies included ethnic minorities, but physical activity was documented in just 2 studies at baseline, and these 2 studies did not include any postintervention follow-up. None of the 10 interventions was conducted in a primary care setting.
Another recent review12 found that ethnically inclusive studies placed greater emphasis on involving communities and building coalitions from study inception, and tailored messages (and messengers) that were culturally specific. Several of these studies showed better outcomes among ethnic minority than white participants sampled.
Taken together, previous reviews have examined the effectiveness of primary care interventions for the general population13,14 as well as community-based programs for underserved populations.2 Little information exists about effective physical activity counseling strategies for underserved groups in primary care.
We conducted a systematic review of the literature involving clinical trials in the US, looking for trials that counseling interventions initiated by primary care clinicians, and that assessed behavioral change related to physical activity.
Inclusion criteria
Table 1 shows the inclusion criteria and search terms for the literature review. We searched Ovid/Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMED, Cochrane, and HealthSTAR for studies published between 1966 and 2005. We also searched bibliographies of retrieved articles, and contacted experts in the field in an effort to obtain other relevant data.
Table 1
Table 1
Inclusion criteria
The principal investigator (JC) reviewed titles and abstracts of all potentially relevant articles to determine whether they met eligibility criteria. Studies that met the criteria were retrieved and abstracted.
Using these predefined criteria, data were extracted from each eligible article. Studies were also rated according to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT), because of its emphasis on patient-oriented outcomes and the quality, quantity, and consistency of evidence.15
We reviewed a total of 253 titles and abstracts. Eight studies1623 met our inclusion criteria. We were not able to locate any clinical trials that both 1) examined the effect of primary care clinician counseling on physical activity outcomes, and 2) had a study population focused on an underserved group.
Table W1 (available online at www.jfponline.com) shows the characteristics of these 8 studies. Table 2 summarizes the interventions used and the results of these studies.
Table 2
Table 2
Keywords used for literature search
Although we sought trials defining “primary care clinician” as a professional—such as MD, nurse practitioner (NP), or physician assistant (PA)—who provides longitudinal primary health care, several of these studies considered dieticians, exercise physiologists, or health care workers as primary care clinicians.
Only 1 study20 examined physical activity counseling with an intervention that incorporated a follow-up visit by the primary care clinician, and looked at the long-term effect on physical activity as an outcome. Thus, the degree to which the clinician’s counseling influenced the physical activity outcome in these studies is unclear.
Identifying the underserved groups
Information on race or ethnicity (which tended to be reported as a single variable), level of education, and income of participants was reported in the demographic data of all studies’ results, but relationships between these variables and physical activity outcomes were not consistently reported. One study23 stratified participants by race/ethnicity and health center; 2 studies16,22 reported analyses and findings for participants according to ethnicity, income, or educational level, as that was their focus.
Overall, however, it is not clear to what extent the interventions succeeded for various underserved groups, even if they were included as participants.
Study designs and the nature of exercise interventions
Seven16,1823 of these studies (88%) were randomized controlled trials; the unit of randomization and control group varied. Trials were conducted at 1 or multiple (up to 11) primary care sites. Use of more than one method to recruit participants—such as mailings, use of office staff to promote/recruit, advertising, and community announcements—tended to be most effective.
Intervention types included phone and mail interventions,1923 computer-based interventions,1719,22 community health worker visits,21,23 group classes,16,21,23 directly supervised physical activity sessions,16,21,23 clinician counseling,1623 and prescription protocols (eg, written, guided action plans).1723 Persons delivering the intervention varied, and included primary care physicians,1723 nurse practitioners or physician assistants,18,21,23 nutritionists,16 exercise physiologists,16 community health educators,21,23 and other study personnel.1719,20,22 Specific elements of interventions likely to contribute to their success include addressing financial or environmental/safety issues for exercise,16 using of trained office staff to provide exercise counseling1720,23, and offering flexibility in choice by tailoring the activity goals and plans suited to the patients’ needs and interests.1723
The “dose” of clinician counseling varied from very brief (1 to 3 minutes of direct contact on 1 occasion) to more extended (>5 minutes of direct counseling over repeated intervals). Duration of follow-up for the 8 studies ranged from 4 months to 2 years.
Several studies designed their interventions to make the clinician counseling brief1720,23 to enhance feasibility for busy primary care settings. Three studies16,21,22 described strategies they used for culturally tailoring the intervention and/or addressing literacy issues for written intervention materials. Two studies16,21 reported that study staff were ethnically or culturally representative of the targeted population.
The difficulty of maintaining adherence to physical activity
Three studies18,19,22 reported having difficulty with attrition among their minority participants; they did not, however, include information specific to minorities in their physical activity outcomes. Studies with highest retention rates (>80%) tended to specifically address barriers to participation, including cultural issues, or used a “lead-in” period.16,20,22,23 The studies with the best adherence and retention among black and Hispanic participants, and those with low educational attainment,16,22 used baseline qualitative data regarding management of health behaviors to inform design of their intervention. For example, one study16 mentioned cultural adaptations derived from prior qualitative work—such as using program materials which extensively depicted African American individuals, families, and community settings—and using language in the intervention reflecting social values and situations relevant to African Americans.
How exercise data was reported
Six of the 8 (75%) studies16,17,1921,23 reported some improvement in short-term physical activity outcomes (Table W1, Table 3); however, there was considerable heterogeneity in how these studies measured physical activity outcomes. All 8 incorporated a self-report measure of physical activity,1623 such as the Patient-centered Assessment and Counseling for Exercise (PACE),1719 Paffenberger Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ),17 7-day Physical Activity Recall (PAR),17,20,22,23 and other self-report recall measures to assess physical activity.
Table 3
Table 3
8 studies on physical activity: The interventions and how they performed
Three studies17,20,23 (38%) also included objective measures of physical activity, such as accelerometers; in these studies, there was not substantial variance in physical activity outcomes between the objective and subjective measures.
When it comes to what effect clinician-based counseling programs have to promote physical activity in underserved populations, information is scarce and inconsistent. Physical inactivity and poor health outcomes related to sedentary behavior disproportionately affect underserved groups, yet these populations have not been systematically included in clinical trials.
This reflects in part the difficult task of designing and implementing realistic interventions in these settings. However, interventions must be replicated in underserved populations before we can necessarily assume that findings from other trials are generalizable, due to issues of access, financial resources, health literacy, beliefs, cultural differences, self-efficacy, and other logistic barriers to traditional care that disproportionately affect underserved groups.
Integrate known personal, social, and environmental factors
Several studies2426 have explored the social, demographic, and environmental factors associated with physical activity in minority populations. These studies shed light on the reasons why clinical trials that focus on white, affluent, educated populations might not be generalizable to underserved groups.
Interventions to promote physical activity in the underserved need to incorporate factors that are associated with success and find ways to address any barriers to be maximally effective. For example, among African American and Hispanic women, having lower “social role strain,” higher attendance at religious services, and a greater feeling that one’s neighborhood was safe were all associated with increased likelihood of exercise.2426 Such studies suggest that differences in beliefs, resources, self-efficacy, prior experience, and competing life demands can all contribute to promoting physical activity in some underserved groups. Practically, such findings encourage clinicians to work with patients to help them identify sources of social support, positive influences on their health, and help them articulate internal strengths and personal attributes to succeed in behavioral change.
Despite the variations in training or means of communication in the studies we identified, some interventions were successful16,22 and improved physical activity. Specifically, these successful trials explicitly anticipated and addressed barriers and challenges to physical activity. These 2 studies also had interventionists who represented the community (or communities) of interest, and they used cultural adaptations to promote exercise where appropriate. Thus, limited data suggest that some primary care–based programs improve physical activity in underserved patients, but the effects of communication from the primary care clinician on physical activity is lacking, consistent with other work in the field.12,27
Promising intervention strategies include office prompts, brief counseling
Primary care clinicians face many time pressures, fiscal constraints, administrative burdens, and competing priorities—these make addressing health promotion behaviors such as physical activity quite difficult. These issues are magnified for clinicians practicing in medically underserved areas. Despite these many challenges, promising opportunities do exist.
On a systems level, practice-based systems to manage chronic diseases have been successfully developed and implemented in the primary care setting; these can be tested to promote physical activity as well. Such practice-based approaches include patient registry data, office prompts, and other electronic systems to promote clinician counseling. For example, studies in this review using computer-based programs in primary care offices were feasible and effective.18,19,22 Bodenheimer28 has argued for a redesign of primary care systems to more effectively address chronic conditions rather than acute care needs; several health care systems have successfully implemented the pillars of such a redesign imperative and shown convincingly the promise of addressing competing priorities, physician competence and confidence, motivation, and durability in improving patient self-management.28
At the level of the clinician-patient relationship, data suggest that patient physical activity can be increased (at least in the short term) by counseling that is:
  • brief (5 minutes or less)1720,23
  • focused/goal-oriented1723
  • molded to the patient’s specific health needs1723
  • delivered over multiple contacts (whether it be office visits, telephone, or group sessions)1723
  • contains a written plan to achieve goals.1723
We do not know what “dose-response” relationship exists for primary care clinician communication with patients over the long term, and what effect repeated counseling would have on long-term sustainability of physical activity levels. This is even less clear for underserved groups.
It is also unknown to what extent collaborative linkages with community programs might increase physical activity in addition to primary care based counseling. Future research should evaluate the optimal “dose-response,” the effect of repeated visits and continuity of care, and the effect of community based referrals for physical activity programs for underserved populations in primary care.
Limitations of this review
Because our inclusion criteria were strict, we omitted potentially meaningful studies that were less directly relevant to our aims. For example, there has been substantial creative community-based work with underserved populations in the US to promote physical activity, and many innovations have been designed by researchers outside the US. Results from these programs and trials should be incorporated into primary care settings working with underserved populations.
Another limitation is that our definition of “underserved” is not the only possible definition. The most marginalized underserved groups with the least access to the health care system (such as the uninsured or homeless) were more likely to be omitted from our results, because we wanted to examine physical activity programs among patients in primary care settings.
Finally, this review did not address the need to understand the causal pathway between sustained improvements in physical activity and patient oriented health outcomes for underserved populations.
Information on clinician counseling interventions in primary care settings to promote physical activity in underserved groups is limited because these groups have not been included in the majority of clinical trials of physical activity thus far. Physical activity interventions need to be replicated in underserved populations before we can assume their results are generalizable. Though characteristics of existing studies show promise, future research on physical activity in underserved populations should assess the effect of practice-based systems on reducing barriers and promoting physical activity, the dose-response effect of clinician counseling on physical activity outcomes, and the effect of the physician-patient relationship and continuity of care on physical activity outcomes.
Practice recommendations
  • Use focused, brief (2–3 minutes) physical activity counseling with patients (SOR: B). Have large-print, easy-to-understand program materials available to supplement your discussion (SOR: B). Provide patients with a simple written plan of their physical activity goals (SOR: B). Focus on a limited number of concepts to avoid information overload (SOR: B).
  • To further help patients in underserved populations, address their financial and logistical barriers to participation and adherence (SOR: B). Encourage flexibility in patients’ choice for exercise, and incorporate cultural adaptations (such as preferences for music, dance, or group activities) where appropriate (SOR: B).
  • Use trained support staff, preferably representing the community of interest, to promote physical activity in your patients (SOR: B).
Resources for exercise interventions
PASE
Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46:153–162.
Scale for sale at www.neriscience.com/web
PACE
PACE+
Prochaska JJ, Zabinski MF, Calfas KJ, Sallis JF, Patrick K. PACE+: interactive communication technology for behavior change in clinical settings. Am J Prev Med 1999; 2:127–131.
Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire
Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hyde RT, Wing AL, Hsieh CC. Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:605–613.
NHIS exercise questions —
Adams PF, Benson V. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1990. Vital & Health Statistics - Series 10: Data From the National Health Survey 1991; 181:1–212.
7-day Physical Activity Recall interview
Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121:91–106.
Healthy Habits Multiple Behavior Change Intervention
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Supplementary Material
01
Acknowledgments
Funding
This study was supported by grant 1R25CA102618 from the National Cancer Institute.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults—United States, 2000–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003. pp. 764–769. [PubMed]
2. Taylor WC, Baranowski T, Young DR. Physical activity interventions in low-income, ethnic minority, and populations with disability. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:334–343. [PubMed]
3. Crespo CJ, Smit E, Andersen RE, Carter-Pokras O, Ainsworth BE. Race/ethnicity, social class and their relation to physical inactivity during leisure time: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:46–53. [PubMed]
4. Mainous AG, Diaz VA, Koopman RJ, Everett CJ. Having a regular physician and attempted weight loss after screening for hypertension or hypercholesterolemia. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29:223–227. [PubMed]
5. Honda K. Factors underlying variation in receipt of physician advice on diet and exercise: Applications of the behavioral model of health care utilization. Am J Health Promot. 2004;18:370–377. [PubMed]
6. Taira DA, Safran DG, Seto TB, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR. The relationship between patient income and physician discussion of health risk behaviors. JAMA. 1997;278:1412–1417. [PubMed]
7. Burton LC, Paglia MJ, German PS, Shapiro S, Damiano AM. The Medicare Preventive Services Research Team. The effect among older persons of a general preventive visit on three health behaviors: smoking, excessive alcohol drinking, and sedentary lifestyle. Prev Med. 1995;24:492–497. [PubMed]
8. Norris SL, Grothaus LC, Buchner DM, Pratt M. Effectiveness of physician-based assessment and counseling for exercise in a staff model HMO. Prev Med. 2000;30:513–523. [PubMed]
9. Swinburn BA, Walter LG, Arroll B, Tilyard MW, Russell DG. The green prescription study: a randomized controlled trial of written exercise advice provided by general practitioners. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:288–291. [PubMed]
10. Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group. Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: final results of the OXCHECK study. BMJ. 1995;310:1099–1104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Bull FC, Kreuter MW, Scharff DP. Effects of tailored, personalized and general health messages on physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36:181–192. [PubMed]
12. Yancey AK, Kumanyika SK, Ponce NA, McCarthy WM, Fielding JE. Population-based interventions engaging communities of color in healthy eating and active living: a review. Prev Chron Dis. 2004;1:1–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Eden KB, Orleans CT, Mulrow CD, Pender NJ, Teutsch SM. Does counseling by clinicians improve physical activity? A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:208–215. [PubMed]
14. Eakin EG, Glasgow RE, Riley KM. Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:158–168. [PubMed]
15. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, et al. Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature. J Fam Pract. 2004;53:111–120. [PubMed]
16. Agurs-Collins TD, Kumanyika SK, Ten Have TR, Adams-Campbell LL. A randomized controlled trial of weight reduction and exercise for diabetes management in older African-American subjects. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1503–1511. [PubMed]
17. Calfas KJ, Long BJ, Sallis JF, Wooten WJ, Pratt M, Patrick K. A controlled trial of physician counseling to promote the adoption of physical activity. Prev Med. 1996;25:225–233. [PubMed]
18. Calfas KJ, Sallis JF, Zabinski MF, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a multicomponent program for nutrition and physical activity change in primary care: PACE+ for adults. Prev Med. 2002;34:153–161. [PubMed]
19. Patrick K, Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, et al. A multicomponent program for nutrition and physical activity change in primary care: PACE+ for adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:940–946. [PubMed]
20. Pinto BM, Goldstein MG, Ashba J, Sciamanna CN, Jette A. Randomized controlled trial of physical activity counseling for older primary care patients. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29:247–255. [PubMed]
21. Staten LK, Gregory-Mercado KY, Ranger-Moore J, et al. Provider counseling, health education, and community health workers: The Arizona WISEWOMAN project. J Women's Health. 2004;13:547–556. [PubMed]
22. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Wilfley DE, Patrick K, Cella JA, Buchta R. Behavioral weight control for overweight adolescents initiated in primary care. Obesity Res. 2002;10:22–32. [PubMed]
23. Writing Group for the Activity Counseling Trial Research Group. Effects of physical activity counseling in primary care: The Activity Counseling Trial: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;286:677–687. [PubMed]
24. Wilbur J, Chandler PJ, Dancy B, Lee H. Correlates of physical activity in urban Midwestern Latinas. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:69–76. [PubMed]
25. Wilbur J, Chandler PJ, Dancy B, Lee H. Correlates of physical activity in urban Midwestern African-American women. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:45–52. [PubMed]
26. Rohm YD, Voorhees CC. Personal, social, and environmental correlates of physical activity in urban African-American women. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:38–44. [PubMed]
27. Yancey AK. Building capacity to prevent and control chronic disease in underserved communities: Expanding the wisdom of WISEWOMAN in intervening at the environmental level. J Women's Health. 2004;13:644–649. [PubMed]
28. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: The chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA. 2002;288:1909–1914. [PubMed]
29. Glynn TJ, Manley MW. How to Help Your Patients Stop Smoking: A Manual for Physicians. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 1989. NIH Publication 89-3064 ed.
30. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985.
31. Williams GC. Improving patients' health through supporting the autonomy of patients and providers. In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press; 2002. pp. 233–254.
32. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–1433. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Sallis JF, Owen N. Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.