PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jcinvestThe Journal of Clinical InvestigationCurrent IssueArchiveSubscriptionAbout the Journal
 
J Clin Invest. 2010 November 1; 120(11): 4055–4064.
Published online 2010 October 18. doi:  10.1172/JCI43721
PMCID: PMC2964992

Prkdc participates in mitochondrial genome maintenance and prevents Adriamycin-induced nephropathy in mice

Abstract

Adriamycin (ADR) is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent that also produces significant tissue damage. Mutations to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and reductions in mtDNA copy number have been identified as contributors to ADR-induced injury. ADR nephropathy only occurs among specific mouse inbred strains, and this selective susceptibility to kidney injury maps as a recessive trait to chromosome 16A1-B1. Here, we found that sensitivity to ADR nephropathy in mice was produced by a mutation in the Prkdc gene, which encodes a critical nuclear DNA double-stranded break repair protein. This finding was confirmed in mice with independent Prkdc mutations. Overexpression of Prkdc in cultured mouse podocytes significantly improved cell survival after ADR treatment. While Prkdc protein was not detected in mitochondria, mice with Prkdc mutations showed marked mtDNA depletion in renal tissue upon ADR treatment. To determine whether Prkdc participates in mtDNA regulation, we tested its genetic interaction with Mpv17, which encodes a mitochondrial protein mutated in human mtDNA depletion syndromes (MDDSs). While single mutant mice were asymptomatic, Prkdc/Mpv17 double-mutant mice developed mtDNA depletion and recapitulated many MDDS and ADR injury phenotypes. These findings implicate mtDNA damage in the development of ADR toxicity and identify Prkdc as a MDDS modifier gene and a component of the mitochondrial genome maintenance pathway.

Introduction

Adriamycin (ADR) nephropathy is a classic experimental model of kidney disease, resulting from selective injury to glomerular podocytes, the visceral epithelial cells that maintain the kidney filtration barrier (13). Genetic or acquired defects that reduce as little as 10%–20% of podocyte cell mass are sufficient to initiate glomerulosclerosis and nephropathy (47). In the ADR nephropathy model, a single dose of ADR produces loss of podocyte foot process architecture and progressive podocyte depletion, resulting in persistent proteinuria, followed by the development of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and finally, global sclerosis (8). This model is frequently used to unmask susceptibility to glomerulosclerosis in genetically manipulated mice or to test the relevance of specific pathways or interventions in the development of nephropathy (13, 811). However, interpretation of studies using the ADR nephropathy model is limited by our lack of understanding of the underlying mechanism of injury. Therefore, elucidation of the mechanisms of tissue injury in this trait can provide insight into pathways mediating glomerulosclerosis and a biological context for studies using this model. Moreover, because ADR is a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug, better understanding of ADR nephropathy can also offer insight into mechanisms of ADR tissue toxicity (12).

ADR is an anthracycline antibiotic with pleiotropic cytotoxic effects used for treatment of solid and hematogenous tumors. Proposed mechanisms of ADR-induced tissue damage include introduction of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs), lipid peroxidation, inhibition of protease activity, disruption of the cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix, and inhibition of the topoisomerase II–mediated religation of the broken DNA strands (1316). In addition, mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and reduction in mtDNA copy number have been increasingly identified as major contributors to ADR-induced tissue injury: ADR can damage mtDNA directly, by intercalating into mtDNA, or indirectly, by generating ROS, producing mtDNA depletion in the kidney and heart after short-term treatment (1721). Cardiomyopathy, the most common side effect of ADR therapy in humans, is also associated with mtDNA damage, and interventions that improve mitochondrial biogenesis are protective against cardiac dysfunction (20, 21).

The mitochondrion has its own 16-kb circular genome, which undergoes replication independent of the cell cycle. The mtDNA has more rapid turnover than nuclear DNA in all tissues and is particularly prone to ROS-mediated injury, because it lacks histone coverage and is localized closely to the inner mitochondrial membrane, a major site of ROS production in cells (22, 23). Because the majority of mitochondrial proteins are encoded in the nucleus, coordinated interactions between the nuclear and mitochondrial compartments are required for mtDNA replication or repair (24, 25). The components of this signaling pathway have not been fully elucidated but are likely critical for cell survival, especially for that of postmitotic cells, such as podocytes or cardiomyocytes, which have poor regenerative potential.

Most of the information about regulation of mtDNA is derived from genetics studies of mtDNA depletion syndrome (MDDS), a group of genetic disorders characterized by multiple organ dysfunction due to spontaneous mtDNA depletion (2628). To date, genes implicated in MDDS involve regulation of mtDNA synthesis or deoxynucleotide production and turnover. Intriguingly, although most MDDS-associated genes are ubiquitously expressed, mutations have variable expressivity, with dysfunction in the liver, muscle, or central nervous system among different patients (28). Moreover, in mice, inactivation of some MDDS genes predominantly manifests as renal damage, which can be severe or indolent (ribonucleotide reductase M2 B [Rrm2b] or MpV17 mitochondrial inner membrane protein [Mpv17], respectively; refs. 29, 30) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The precise reasons underlying the variability in end-organ complication of MDDS are not known, but these data suggest that there are tissue- and cell-specific thresholds for tolerance of mtDNA damage. Moreover, the occurrence of mtDNA depletion in both ADR nephropathy and MDDS suggests a shared pathogenesis between these traits, indicating that understanding the genetic basis of ADR nephropathy can inform not only about mechanisms of ADR-mediated toxicity but may also clarify pathways mediating mtDNA maintenance.

Mouse laboratory strains demonstrate contrasting susceptibility to ADR nephropathy, allowing application of genetics approaches to elucidate the underlying biology. We had previously performed systematic screening of 15 inbred strains and identified 3 highly susceptible strains (BALB/cJ [BALB], 129S1/SvImJ, and 129X1/SvJ), while other strains (such as C57BL/6J [B6]) were completely resistant (31, 32). We had also shown that this dichotomous susceptibility among inbred strains segregates as a single-gene recessive defect that maps to chromosome 16A1-B1 (31). Because laboratory strains are derived from a limited set of ancestors, this suggested that the shared susceptibility represents inheritance of the same ancestral susceptibility allele. Consistent with this hypothesis, high-resolution mapping of the ADR nephropathy locus defined a risk haplotype that predicted susceptibility to nephrotoxicity and allowed us to reduce the locus to a 1.3-Mb segment, containing 20 genes (32).

Here, we demonstrate that a mutation in the protein kinase, DNA-activated, catalytic polypeptide (Prkdc) gene is the underlying cause of susceptibility to ADR nephropathy. To determine whether mtDNA depletion is the likely mechanism of injury, we performed a test of genetic interactions that demonstrated that combined mutations in the Prkdc and the Mpv17 genes resulted in early-onset mtDNA depletion and multiple organ injury, recapitulating many MDDS and ADR injury phenotypes in the absence of ADR. This provides evidence for what we believe to be a novel role for Prkdc in the MDDS pathway, implicating a nuclear DNA repair protein in the maintenance of mitochondrial genome.

Results

Application of meiotic mapping and haplotype analysis refines the ADR nephropathy susceptibility locus to a mutation in the Prkdc gene.

We had previously mapped the murine ADR nephropathy susceptibility locus to a 1.3-Mb segment on chromosome 16A1-B1, containing 20 genes (31, 32). We further refined this map location by meiotic mapping in 1,622 F2 and backcross progeny between the susceptible BALB and resistant B6 strains. We tested all 68 mice with informative recombinations in this interval for susceptibility to ADR nephropathy, using our standard protocol (31, 32). We identified 4 critical recombinants in affected mice that localized the susceptibility gene to a 261-kb segment flanked by rs4164904 and rs4164958, an interval that contains 3 transcribed genes: Ube2v2, Mcm4, and Prkdc (Figure (Figure1A).1A). To refine this region further, we performed analysis of haplotypes among 48 inbred strains and identified 1 laboratory strain, RIIIS/J, which shows a recombinant haplotype within the minimal meiotic interval. The RIIIS/J strain shares a common haplotype with the susceptible BALB strain from 14.31 to 15.73 Mb but transitions to a divergent haplotype distal to rs4164948 (Figure (Figure1B).1B). This 1.42-Mb haplotype, shared between the RIIIS/J and BALB strains, also includes an approximately 450-kb segment with a very low polymorphism rate (0.008%) compared with that of the WSB/EiJ strain. Given the common origin and limited haplotype structure of laboratory strains (33), the finding of a 1.42-Mb shared segment between the BALB and RIIIS/J strains is highly indicative of inheritance by descent from a common founder. Phenotypic screening revealed that RIIIS/J, WSB/EiJ, and (BALB × RIIIS/J) F1 hybrids are all resistant to ADR nephropathy, thereby localizing the susceptibility allele distal to rs4164948 (Figure (Figure1,1, B and C). Thus, in combination, the meiotic mapping and haplotype analyses refined the ADR nephropathy locus to a 146-kb interval delimited by rs4164948 and rs4164958, which includes only a part of the Prkdc gene, extending from intron 21 through intron 76 (Figure (Figure1C).1C). Prkdc was a compelling candidate, because it encodes the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase, a critical component of the nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway (34), which is particularly important for repair of DSBs in nondividing cells, such as podocytes.

Figure 1
Mapping and identification of the Prkdc mutation.

We first sequenced all 56 Prkdc exons and flanking introns located within this 146-kb interval and identified a C6418T transition in exon 48 of the gene. This was the only coding variant detected in the critical region, was found among all 3 strains susceptible to ADR nephropathy (BALB, 129S1/SvImJ, and 129X1/SvJ), and was absent in all 17 strains with known resistance, including RIIIS/J and WSB/EiJ (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.0009; refs. 31, 32). The C6418T transition produces a nonconservative substitution, changing codon 2140 of Prkdc from CGT (arginine in B6) to TGT (cysteine in BALB; Figure Figure1D).1D). This R2140C substitution occurs within an amino acid segment that is highly conserved from human to fugu, residing in a larger conserved domain of unknown function (called NUC194; Figure Figure1E;1E; ref. 35). We next conservatively sequenced all the exons and flanking introns of genes localized within the 261-kb minimal recombinant interval in the resistant B6 and the sensitive BALB strains (Ube2v2, Mcm4, and Prkdc) and found no other coding variants. Further screening of remaining Prkdc exons identified another missense variant (A11530G in exon 81), but this variant resides outside the recombinant interval and results in a conservative M3844V substitution. These data indicated that the R2140C variant is most likely the functional mutation underlying susceptibility to ADR nephropathy.

To detect a functional effect of the R2140C variant, we next examined expression of Prkdc in the kidney of resistant and susceptible strains. We found no changes in baseline Prkdc transcript levels between BALB and B6 strains but detected an 80%–90% reduction in protein abundance in the BALB strain, which was comparable to levels observed in B6.CB17 mice harboring the SCID allele, a spontaneous loss-of-function mutation in Prkdc (36). This suggested that the R2140C substitution may affect protein stability and is a loss-of-function mutation, which is also consistent with the recessive transmission of the trait (Figure (Figure1F). 1F).

Induction of ADR nephropathy in mice with independent Prkdc mutations confirmed that Prkdc is the ADR nephropathy susceptibility gene.

To obtain independent confirmation that a mutation in Prkdc is responsible for susceptibility to ADR nephropathy, we tested ADR susceptibility in 2 strains with independent loss-of-function mutations in Prkdc on the resistant B6 background, the Prkdc-KO strain with targeted inactivation of Prkdc (37) and the B6.CB17 strain with the spontaneous PrkdcSCID allele (36, 38), both resulting in lack of functional Prkdc protein. ADR injection recapitulated the ADR nephropathy phenotype in both strains, with renal histology showing tubular casts, mesangial sclerosis, and FSGS (Figure (Figure22 and Supplemental Figure 2; supplemental material available online with this article; doi: 10.1172/JCI43721DS1). The development of ADR-induced nephropathy in strains with independent Prkdc mutations on the resistant B6 background provides formal proof that Prkdc is the ADR susceptibility gene.

Figure 2
Development of ADR nephropathy in mice with independent mutations in Prkdc.

Quantitative comparison of mice with different Prkdc alleles demonstrated subtle differences in ADR nephropathy phenotype. Although the BALB, Prkdc-KO, and B6.CB17 strains developed similar severity of nephropathy (Figure (Figure2J),2J), the Prkdc-KO mice (Prkdc–/–; Figure Figure2,2, G–I) were most sensitive to ADR administration, which resulted in death by day 7–8 after injection, likely due to extra-renal toxicity. We also found that haploinsufficient mice (Prkdc+/–) developed a milder form of ADR nephropathy within 14–21 days of ADR administration (P < 0.05, t test, compared with Prkdc–/– mice), developing glomerular mesangial sclerosis, cystic tubular dilatation, and proteinaceous casts (Figure (Figure2,2, D–F). Finally, this milder phenotype was never observed in (B6 × BALB) F1 hybrids (Figure (Figure2,2, A–C), indicating that the R2140 mutation in BALB mice is not a complete loss of function. In contrast, the presence of 2 PrkdcBALB alleles in (BALB × B6) F2 mice resulted in ADR nephropathy (Figure (Figure2J).2J). These data demonstrated a gene-dosage effect in the development of ADR nephropathy.

PRKDC is expressed in podocytes, and its overexpression protects podocytes from ADR cytotoxicity.

As podocytes are the site of primary damage in ADR nephropathy (1, 2), we further verified that PRKDC is expressed in these cells using immunohistochemistry and confirmed that PRKDC expression in the glomerulus was restricted to endothelial cells and podocytes with a nuclear localization pattern (Figure (Figure3,3, A and B). To further examine the role of PRKDC in ADR resistance in podocytes, we generated a mouse podocyte clone (Prkdc+) stably overexpressing Prkdc at approximately 10-fold higher levels, compared with the control podocyte cell line (Figure (Figure3C).3C). We next compared podocyte survival in both lines at 7 days after ADR exposure at 2 concentrations (0.1 and 0.2 μg/ml). To identify the possible induction of cell proliferation by Prkdc overexpression, we monitored cell morphology and confluence after ADR exposure, as podocytes have very distinct cell morphology in differentiated and proliferating states. In control podocytes harboring the B6 Prkdc allele, ADR produced a dose-dependent decrease in cell number, with no areas of proliferation or visible changes in cell morphology, resulting in less than 25% cell survival after exposure (t test, P < 0.005). On the other hand, overexpression of Prkdc resulted in near-complete survival of podocytes (Figure (Figure3D),3D), without evidence of proliferation, suggesting that the enhanced survival was due to decreased apoptosis. The localization of PRKDC to podocytes is consistent with the known pathogenesis of ADR nephropathy, and the rescue of cytotoxicity by its overexpression provides further proof that Prkdc protects against ADR-induced podocyte damage.

Figure 3
PRKDC is expressed in podocytes, and its overexpression protects against ADR cytotoxicity.

ADR induced significant depletion of kidney mtDNA in mice with the Prkdc susceptibility allele.

ADR produces cytotoxic damage via a variety of mechanisms, such as DNA intercalation and topoisomerase inhibition, but mtDNA damage has been implicated as a major mechanism for toxicity in nonreplicating cells, such as cardiomyocytes (12, 21). We therefore examined mtDNA levels in renal tissue by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Southern blot and compared the levels in ADR-treated mice carrying different Prkdc alleles (Figure (Figure4,4, A and B). While baseline mtDNA levels were similar between the sensitive and resistant strains, ADR administration resulted in 2.3-fold mtDNA depletion in F2 mice homozygous for the Prkdc susceptibility allele, which developed nephropathy within 14 days of ADR administration (t test, P = 0.003; Figure Figure4A).4A). This mtDNA depletion detected by qPCR was further confirmed by Southern blot analysis of the same DNA samples (Figure (Figure4B).4B). Time-course analyses demonstrated that by 14 days after treatment, ADR induced a 1.7-fold increase in mtDNA in B6 mice (t test P < 0.05) but a significant 1.9-fold reduction in BALB mice (t test, P < 0.03), resulting in approximately 3-fold difference between the strains (t test, P = 0.008; Figure Figure4C).4C). These findings were further confirmed by the correlated changes in Tfam, a mtDNA-binding protein whose expression normally parallels mtDNA levels (Figure (Figure4D).4D). These data therefore raised the possibility that Prkdc participates in mtDNA maintenance, perhaps via a direct function in mitochondria. However, confocal microscopy of podocytes and 293 HEK cells demonstrated nuclear localization of PRKDC, and there was no evidence of colocalizations with mitochondrial markers (Mitotraker Red) in control conditions or after ADR treatment (Figure (Figure4,4, E–G, and Supplemental Figure 3, A–F). We also did not detect PRKDC in proteinase K–treated mitochondrial fractions isolated from the kidney (Supplemental Figure 3J). These findings suggest indirect involvement of Prkdc in mtDNA maintenance, likely through intermediate proteins in the pathway.

Figure 4
mtDNA depletion in ADR nephropathy.

Genetic interaction between Prkdc and Mpv17 provides evidence for participation of Prkdc in mtDNA maintenance.

The mtDNA depletion in ADR nephropathy resembles the phenotype of patients with MDDS, a heterogeneous group of disorders produced by impairment in mtDNA synthesis or mitochondrial deoxynucleotide metabolism (28). In particular, mutations in some MDDS genes, such as Mpv17, encoding a mitochondrial inner membrane protein, predominantly manifest as nephropathy in mice (26, 30). Mpv17-null mice only manifest late-onset kidney disease due to glomerular mtDNA depletion (age >200 days), suggestive of an indolent form of ADR nephropathy. Considering that Prkdc and Mpv17 are expressed in the nuclear and mitochondrial compartments, respectively, and deficiency of either gene alone does not produce overt organ dysfunction at an early age regardless of genetic background (30, 36, 37, 39, 40), tests of genetic interaction between these genes would provide compelling evidence for primary participation of Prkdc in mtDNA maintenance. Accordingly, we generated a cross between B6.CB17 (harboring the PrkdcSCID allele) and Mpv17-null strains to determine the effect of reducing Prkdc gene dosage on mtDNA levels. While mice homozygous for Prkdc or Mpv17 mutation alone showed no overt cardiac, hepatic, or renal lesions and longevity up to 12 months of age, loss of Prkdc gene dosage in Mpv17–/– mice resulted in spontaneous and early-onset kidney, liver, and heart disease, resulting in significant mortality by 16 weeks of age (log-rank test, P = 1 × 10–4; Figure Figure5).5). The double homozygote mutants had the worst outcome, including significantly lower survival compared with mice with that of Prkdc-haploinsufficient mice (log-rank test, P < 1 × 10–3), and 23% manifested severe ascites at demise (Figure (Figure5A5A and Supplemental Figure 4A). Histopathologic examination demonstrated glomerulosclerosis, cystic tubular dilatation, and proteinaceous casts in the kidney (Figure (Figure5C)5C) and hepatocyte nuclear enlargement, apoptosis, cytoplasmic vacuolization, congestion, and necrosis in the liver (Figure (Figure5D5D and Supplemental Figure 4, B–D). In addition, we noted myocyte atrophy, fibrosis, and inflammation in the heart (Figure (Figure5E).5E). Electron microscopy studies in cardiac tissue showed significant loss of mitochondrial architecture in double-null PrkdcSCID/SCIDMpv17–/– mice, compared with that of Prkdc+/+Mpv17–/– mice (Figure (Figure5,5, F and G, and Supplemental Figure 4, E and F). We next measured mtDNA levels in all 3 tissues using qPCR and evaluated the effects of Prkdc gene deletion in Mpv17-null mice (Figure (Figure5B).5B). We found a linear decrease in mtDNA level with decreasing Prkdc gene dosage in the kidney and heart, particularly in double-mutant mice compared with the groups with the wild-type Prkdc allele. Consistent with previous reports of Mpv17-null mice, there was severe mtDNA depletion in livers of all 3 groups (<10% of control) and only a trend toward worse depletion in double-mutant mice. The severe mtDNA depletion detected in the liver may be explained by the very low baseline level of Prkdc in the liver (Supplemental Figure 1), which suggests that all 3 groups can be considered as “liver-specific” double mutants from a functional point of view.

Figure 5
An intercross between Mpv17–/– and PrkdcSCID/SCID mice confirms genetic interaction between Mpv17 and Prkdc.

The findings of spontaneous heart, liver, and kidney lesions and mtDNA depletion in double homozygote mice provide strong evidence of genetic interaction between Prkdc and Mpv17, as neither Mpv17- nor Prkdc-null mice, described on different genetic backgrounds, have these severe early clinical phenotypes (30, 36, 37, 39, 40). Nevertheless, to further rule out a genetic background effect, we performed a genome-wide scan, with 732 informative markers in the Prkdc/Mpv17 cross. Analysis of linkage found significant linkage of cardiac and renal mtDNA levels, but not of liver mtDNA levels, to the Prkdc locus on chromosome 16A1 (lod scores of 4.6 and 3.2, respectively; Supplemental Figure 5). There were no other loci across the genome that explained variation in these traits. This analysis ruled out a genetic background effect on our phenotypes and further implicated genetic interaction between Prkdc and Mpv17 as the cause of synthetic pathology.

Discussion

This study identifies a mutation in Prkdc as the genetic basis of interstrain susceptibility to murine ADR nephropathy, one of the most commonly used experimental models of kidney injury. Our findings are supported by precise mapping data, identification of a nonconservative missense variant with loss of protein expression in susceptible strains, and recapitulation of ADR nephropathy in 2 strains, with independent mutations in Prkdc. We also showed that Prkdc is expressed in podocytes, the principal cell injured in ADR nephropathy, and its overexpression in podocytes cell lines results in increased survival after ADR treatment. We further found that ADR nephropathy produces significant mtDNA depletion in mice homozygous for mutant Prkdc alleles, suggesting what we believe to be a novel role for Prkdc in mtDNA maintenance. This was confirmed by our studies of the genetic interaction of Prkdc with the Mpv17, a gene that is expressed in mitochondria and is mutated in human MDDS. The finding of spontaneous mtDNA depletion in Prkdc/Mpv17 double-mutant mice simultaneously implicates mtDNA damage in the pathogenesis of ADR nephropathy and to our knowledge, identifies Prkdc as novel component of the mitochondrial genome maintenance pathway.

Prkdc encodes the catalytic subunit of the trimeric DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) and has essential roles in DNA repair, signal transduction, and transcriptional activation.

Genetic defects in the Prkdc or the Ku70 and Ku80 genes (encoding the regulatory subunits of DNA-PK) result in immunodeficiency, radiosensitivity, and premature aging, which are generally attributed to the requirement for DNA-PK in nonhomologous end-joining DSB repair, the primary mode of DNA repair in nonreplicating cells (34, 38, 41). Upon initiation of DSBs, Prkdc is recruited by the Ku70 and Ku80 subunits and aligns broken DNA ends, enabling DNA polymerase and other ligation factors to repair the breaks (34, 38, 41). This DSB repair function is also essential in lymphocyte development, which necessitates repeated rounds of DNA break and repair during VDJ recombination (42). Prkdc also participates in signal transduction cascades related to apoptotic cell death (43), telomere maintenance, and genome surveillance (44). Most recently, Prkdc has also been implicated as an essential coactivator of multiple transcription factors (45). In this function, Prkdc is part of a multimeric protein complex that unwinds DNA through site-specific induction and repair of DSBs, thereby facilitating access of transcription factors to their binding sites. To date, the Prkdc containing complex has been implicated in coactivation of the estrogen receptor, USF (46), Sp1 (47) NRF1 (48), or FoxA2 (49). Moreover, Prkdc-deficient cells manifest global defects in transcriptional activation, suggesting that Prkdc regulates many additional transcription factors and metabolic processes (50). Interestingly, there may be critical thresholds for completion of multifaceted functions of Prkdc. For example, BALB mice produce a very low level of Prkdc protein, which is functionally sufficient for lymphocyte maturation but insufficient to resist DNA-damaging agents, such as ADR. More deleterious Prkdc mutations, such as the SCID mutation or complete null alleles, result in immunodeficiency, radiosensitivity, and premature aging (38). Consistent with these findings, the severity of response to ADR varied according to functional deficit in Prkdc alleles: null mice demonstrated early lethality and susceptibility to ADR nephropathy; the near-null SCID mice displayed ADR nephropathy but survived longer; and haploinsufficient mice developed a milder form of ADR nephropathy within 14–21 days of ADR administration, which was never observed in (B6 × BALB) F1 hybrids.

Here, we identify what we believe to be a novel role for Prkdc in maintenance of the mitochondrial genome. We detected significant kidney mtDNA depletion in ADR-treated mice homozygous for Prkdc susceptibility alleles, consistent with data demonstrating that mtDNA depletion is the major mechanism of ADR injury in postmitotic cells, likely due to direct intercalation into mtDNA (51). However, we did not detect colocalization of PRKDC with mitochondrial markers in podocytes or 293HEK cells or in proteinase K–treated kidney mitochondrial fractions, suggesting that it did not contribute to mtDNA maintenance via a direct function within mitochondria. Since Prkdc has many roles in signal transduction and transcriptional regulation, the alternative hypothesis was that it participates in a nuclear signaling pathway that sustains the integrity of mtDNA or promotes mitochondrial biogenesis subsequent to genotoxic stress. This hypothesis was consistent with the results of a recent RNAi screen, showing that genes required for ADR resistance in yeast are involved in nuclear DNA repair as well as mitochondrial homeostasis, demonstrating a link between these pathways (52).

To confirm that Prkdc participates in mtDNA maintenance, we performed tests of genetic interaction between Prkdc and Mpv17 genes. The Mpv17 gene was an excellent candidate for testing genetic interaction because it encodes a mitochondrial inner membrane protein and its mutations produce MDDS in humans and mice (26, 30). Moreover, Mpv17 mutant mice do not manifest early-onset organ dysfunction, providing an unambiguous starting point for testing the effect of Prkdc gene dosage on phenotype (26, 30). While mice with mutations in either single gene were asymptomatic up to 12 months of age, Prkdc/Mpv17 double-mutant mice developed significant cardiac and renal mtDNA depletion and spontaneous liver, heart, and kidney disease, resulting in excess mortality by 16 weeks of age. The double-mutant mice also displayed severe mitochondrial structural lesions in cardiomyocytes by electron microscopy. These findings recapitulated both MDDS and ADR injury phenotypes in the absence of ADR, demonstrating that the 2 mutations introduced genetic lesions in a common pathway critical to mtDNA maintenance.

It is difficult to predict the precise molecular mechanism through which Prkdc regulates mtDNA, because we still have a limited knowledge of the nuclear-mitochondrial communication pathways mediating mtDNA maintenance. The known MDDS genes do not account for all the cases, and the function of some genes, such as Mpv17, remains largely unknown, suggesting many yet-undiscovered components of this pathway. Since Prkdc is a multifunctional protein, it may regulate MPV17 or any of genes implicated in MDDS via one of its described functions: as a kinase, as a signal transduction protein, or as a transcriptional coactivator. Alternatively, Prkdc may participate in an “emergency” mtDNA maintenance pathway, which is dormant under normal conditions but is activated in DNA-damaging conditions. In this regard, Prkdc was recently found to participate in coactivation of NRF1, a transcription factor critical for mitochondrial biogenesis (48), and, thus, one can hypothesize that Prkdc mutations prevent an adequate biogenic response to genotoxic stress. These hypotheses form plausible starting points for future investigation, but given the manifold functions of Prkdc, we expect that a broad array of experiments will be required to adequately dissect its exact role in the mtDNA maintenance pathway.

Mutations in genes that are ubiquitously expressed can result in cell- and organ-specific defects, but the underlying reasons for this are frequently not understood. For example, the ACTN4, IFN2, or TRPC6 genes are broadly expressed, but their mutations produce podocyte dysfunction and nephropathy (5355). Similarly, mutations in some genes encoding mitochondrial respiratory chains produce podocyte dysfunction, while acquired mtDNA mutations have also been described in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions (56, 57). One can surmise that genetic mutations produce functional defects only in cells/organs lacking redundant or modifier pathways or in the setting of specific physiologic states or metabolic demands. In the case of podocytes, we can also hypothesize that their terminally differentiated state would prevent cell division and limit repair subsequent to injury. Our study provides additional insight into the problem of variable organ injury in MDDS. We identify Prkdc and its downstream pathways as logical candidate modifiers that may explain variable severity of mtDNA depletion, disease onset, and target organ damage in MDDS patients and mouse models. Finally, the finding of cardiac mtDNA depletion and cardiomyopathy in the Prkdc/Mpv17 double-mutant mice is also very intriguing, because cardiotoxicity due to mtDNA depletion is the main side effect of ADR therapy in humans. These findings suggest that elucidation of the components of the PRKDC/MPV17 signaling pathway may inform about biological mechanisms mediating ADR-mediated cardiomyopathy.

Recent data have also implicated 2 Prkdc homologs (ATM and ATL-1) in regulation of mtDNA levels in mammalian and worm cells (58, 59). Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), another PI3K involved in the homologous recombination DSB repair, has been shown to participate in mitochondrial genome maintenance via regulation of the RRM2B subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, which is critical for de novo generation of deoxynucleotides and is mutated in some patients with MDDS (27, 58, 60). The ATM-mediated RRM2B regulation thus presents a strong parallel to the Prkdc/Mpv17 interaction observed in the present study, offering another link between the PI3K gene family and the MDDS pathway. Similarly, inactivation of ATL-1 causes significant mtDNA loss in Caenorhabditis elegans, but downstream pathways have not been identified. Together with our study, these data indicate a new general pathway linking the nuclear DNA repair program to mtDNA regulation. Identification of additional components of this novel nuclear-mitochondrial communication pathway may uncover alternative mechanisms of mtDNA maintenance and further elucidate pathways underlying organ dysfunction in MDDS or anthracycline-mediated toxicity.

Methods

Mice.

Inbred strains, Mpv17-null mice, and B6.CB17-Prkdcscid/SzJ (B6.CB17) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Mpv17-null mice were bred onto an FVB/NJ genetic background for more than 10 generations. Prkdc-knockout mice on the B6 background were a gift from D. Chen (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA) (37). To refine the ADR nephropathy susceptibility locus, we produced 176 F2 and 1,446 backcross progeny between BALB and B6 mice and phenotyped 68 mice with informative recombinations between rs4164770 and rs4165049. ADR nephropathy was produced by tail vein injection (10 mg/kg) (31). Heterozygous (Prkdc+/–) and homozygous (Prkdc–/–) Prkdc-knockout mice and control BALB × B6-F1 hybrid mice were injected with ADR, as above, at 16 to 20 weeks of age. For a time-course analysis, BALB and B6 mice were injected with ADR, as above (in triplicates for each strain), and sacrificed at 3 hours and 3, 7, and 14 days after injection. To assess the phenotypic effect of combination of mutant Prkdc and Mpv17 alleles, we generated an intercross between B6.CB17 (SCID) and Mpv17-null strain (n = 152) and analyzed the effect of Prkdc gene dosage on an Mpv17-null background. These mice were followed up to 23 weeks, and kidneys, hearts, and livers were collected at sacrifice. The protocol was approved by the IACUC at the Columbia University Medical Center.

Genotyping, sequencing, and quantitative analysis of mtDNA.

Microsatellite markers were genotyped by capillary electrophoresis. SNP loci for inbred strains were obtained from NCBI and the Mouse Phenome Database ( http://phenome.jax.org/), and additional SNP loci were genotyped by direct sequencing. Total kidney DNA was isolated using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen). mtDNA levels were quantitated by qPCR using SYBR Green Mix (Bio-Rad) and presented as a ratio of mitochondria-encoded COX1 to nuclear-encoded Rn18s, standardized to a reference sample (B6) included in each run. The COX1 and Rn18s probes for Southern blotting were generated using the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche). Total DNA was digested with SacI enzyme, separated, transferred onto nylon membrane, and hybridized with the probes, and the membrane was developed using anti–DIG-AP antibody (Roche). The primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 1. To exclude a genetic background effect, we performed a genome scan in the Mpv17/SCID cross, using the Illumina Mouse Medium Density Set. In this genotyping set, 732 SNP loci were informative between FVB and B6. Analysis of linkage of mtDNA levels was performed using the Haley-Knott regression method and the R/QTL program ( http://www.rqtl.org). LOD scores of more than 3 were considered significant.

Western blot.

Western blot analysis of whole kidney lysates (100 μg of total protein per well) was performed using the Immobilon Western ECL Detection Kit (Millipore) and the following antibodies: monoclonal mouse anti–DNA-PKcs Ab-4 (Neomarkers), anti-GAPDH (R&D Systems), goat mt-TFA (A-17) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), HRP-labeled sheep anti-mouse antibody (Amersham), and donkey anti-goat antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.).

Cell culture.

Conditionally immortalized murine and human podocyte cells were gifts from P. Klotman (Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA) and J. Reiser. The murine podocyte cells (MPCs) harbored the B6 haplotype at the Prkdc locus. A murine clone stably overexpressing Prkdc (Prkdc+) was selected after transfection with the EF-Prkdc.pGEM 9 plasmid, which encoded the full-length cDNA of mouse Prkdc from B6 mice under elongation factor α (EF) promoter and zeocin resistance cassette. Podocytes were differentiated for 14 days at 37°C prior to experiments. MPCs were treated with 0.1 or 0.2 μg/ml ADR for 24 hours, and then the medium was changed and incubation was continued for 7 days, at which point the cells were collected and counted for survival analysis.

Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy.

Kidneys, hearts, and livers were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded, and 3-μm sections were cut and stained with H&E or periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) or used for immunohistochemistry. The total histologic kidney injury score was calculated as an average of 4 histologic scores (acute tubular injury, tubular cast dilatation, mesangial sclerosis, and glomerulosclerosis scores), quantified on the 0–3+ scale. Immunohistochemistry was performed using mouse monoclonal antibody DNA-PKcs Ab-4 (Neomarkers) and HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse DakoCytomation EnVision+ system (Dako), followed by diaminobenzidine. The glomerular basement membrane was visualized with PAS reaction, without a nuclear counterstain. The podocytes were localized specifically by their anatomic location, as they are the only glomerular cell type overlying the glomerular basement membrane in the urinary space (outside the glomerular capillaries).

For confocal microscopy, differentiated human podocytes or 293HEK cells were incubated with Mitotraker Red (Invitrogen), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained with mouse DNA-PKcs Ab-4 (Neomarkers) and goat anti-mouse Amaxa 488 antibody (Invitrogen). Control and ADR-treated (0.5 μg/ml) podocytes were compared in order to detect possible translocation of Prkdc to the mitochondria in stress conditions.

Statistics.

Comparisons of mtDNA among strains were performed by 2-sided t tests. Data represent mean ± SEM. Survival analysis in Prkdc/Mpv17 intercross mice was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test, with a global comparison between genotype groups, and by comparisons of groups with the ≥ 3 mutant alleles to groups with single-gene mutant homozygotes. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data:

Acknowledgments

We thank Estela Area-Gomez for help with mitochondria methodology and Richard Lifton, Michio Hirano, and our laboratory members for insightful discussions. A.G. Gharavi is supported by the Columbia Center for Glomerular Diseases. This study was also supported by the histology core facility of the Columbia Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center (NIH P30-DK63608).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Citation for this article: J Clin Invest. 2010;120(11):4055–4064. doi:10.1172/JCI43721.

References

1. Rossmann P, Matousovic K, Bohdanecka M. Experimental adriamycin nephropathy. Fine structure, morphometry, glomerular polyanion, and cell membrane antigens. J Pathol. 1993;169(1):99–108. doi: 10.1002/path.1711690115. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Wang Y, Wang YP, Tay YC, Harris DC. Progressive adriamycin nephropathy in mice: sequence of histologic and immunohistochemical events. Kidney Int. 2000;58(4):1797–1804. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00342.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Kaplan BS, Renaud L, Drummond KN. Effects of aminonucleoside, daunomycin, and adriamycin on carbon oxidation by glomeruli. Lab Invest. 1976;34(2):174–178. [PubMed]
4. Tryggvason K, Patrakka J, Wartiovaara J. Hereditary proteinuria syndromes and mechanisms of proteinuria. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(13):1387–1401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052131. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Kim YH, et al. Podocyte depletion and glomerulosclerosis have a direct relationship in the PAN-treated rat. Kidney Int. 2001;60(3):957–968. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.060003957.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Wharram BL, et al. Podocyte depletion causes glomerulosclerosis: diphtheria toxin-induced podocyte depletion in rats expressing human diphtheria toxin receptor transgene. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(10):2941–2952. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005010055. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Wiggins JE, et al. Podocyte hypertrophy, “adaptation,” and “decompensation” associated with glomerular enlargement and glomerulosclerosis in the aging rat: prevention by calorie restriction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(10):2953–2966. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050488. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Bertani T, et al. Adriamycin-induced nephrotic syndrome in rats: sequence of pathologic events. Lab Invest. 1982;46(1):16–23. [PubMed]
9. Cao Q, et al. IL-10/TGF-{beta}-modified macrophages induce regulatory T cells and protect against adriamycin nephrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(6):933–942. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009060592. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Cheng H, Fan X, Guan Y, Moeckel GW, Zent R, Harris RC. Distinct roles for basal and induced COX-2 in podocyte injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(9):1953–1962. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009010039. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Dai C, Stolz DB, Kiss LP, Monga SP, Holzman LB, Liu Y. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling promotes podocyte dysfunction and albuminuria. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(9):1997–2008. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009010019. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Grenier MA, Lipshultz SE. Epidemiology of anthracycline cardiotoxicity in children and adults. Semin Oncol. 1998;25(4 suppl 10):72–85. [PubMed]
13. Fukuda F, Kitada M, Horie T, Awazu S. Evaluation of adriamycin-induced lipid peroxidation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992;44(4):755–760. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(92)90413-D. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Paczek L, Teschner M, Schaefer RM, Kovar J, Romen W, Heidland A. Intraglomerular proteinase activity in adriamycin-induced nephropathy. Nephron. 1992;60(1):81–86. doi: 10.1159/000186709. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Coers W, Huitema S, van der Horst ML, Weening JJ. Puromycin aminonucleoside and adriamycin disturb cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix protein organization, but not protein synthesis of cultured glomerular epithelial cells. Exp Nephrol. 1994;2(1):40–50. [PubMed]
16. Akman SA, Doroshow JH, Burke TG, Dizdaroglu M. DNA base modifications induced in isolated human chromatin by NADH dehydrogenase-catalyzed reduction of doxorubicin. Biochemistry. 1992;31(13):3500–3506. doi: 10.1021/bi00128a026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Tewey KM, Rowe TC, Yang L, Halligan BD, Liu LF. Adriamycin-induced DNA damage mediated by mammalian DNA topoisomerase II. Science. 1984;226(4673):466–468. doi: 10.1126/science.6093249. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Lawrence JW, Darkin-Rattray S, Xie F, Neims AH, Rowe TC. 4-Quinolones cause a selective loss of mitochondrial DNA from mouse L1210 leukemia cells. J Cell Biochem. 1993;51(2):165–174. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240510208. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Adachi K, et al. A deletion of mitochondrial DNA in murine doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;195(2):945–951. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2135. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Lebrecht D, Kokkori A, Ketelsen UP, Setzer B, Walker UA. Tissue-specific mtDNA lesions and radical-associated mitochondrial dysfunction in human hearts exposed to doxorubicin. J Pathol. 2005;207(4):436–444. doi: 10.1002/path.1863. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Suliman HB, Carraway MS, Ali AS, Reynolds CM, Welty-Wolf KE, Piantadosi CA. The CO/HO system reverses inhibition of mitochondrial biogenesis and prevents murine doxorubicin cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(12):3730–3741. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Gross NJ, Getz GS, Rabinowitz M. Apparent turnover of mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid and mitochondrial phospholipids in the tissues of the rat. J Biol Chem. 1969;244(6):1552–1562. [PubMed]
23. Palmeira CM, Serrano J, Kuehl DW, Wallace KB. Preferential oxidation of cardiac mitochondrial DNA following acute intoxication with doxorubicin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1321(2):101–106. [PubMed]
24. Cannino G, Di Liegro CM, Rinaldi AM. Nuclear-mitochondrial interaction. Mitochondrion. 2007;7(6):359–366. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2007.07.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Scarpulla RC. Transcriptional paradigms in mammalian mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Physiol Rev. 2008;88(2):611–638. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Spinazzola A, et al. MPV17 encodes an inner mitochondrial membrane protein and is mutated in infantile hepatic mitochondrial DNA depletion. Nat Genet. 2006;38(5):570–575. doi: 10.1038/ng1765. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Bourdon A, et al. Mutation of RRM2B, encoding p53-controlled ribonucleotide reductase (p53R2), causes severe mitochondrial DNA depletion. Nat Genet. 2007;39(6):776–780. doi: 10.1038/ng2040. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Rahman S, Poulton J. Diagnosis of mitochondrial DNA depletion syndromes. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(1):3–5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.147983. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Kimura T, Takeda S, Sagiya Y, Gotoh M, Nakamura Y, Arakawa H. Impaired function of p53R2 in Rrm2b-null mice causes severe renal failure through attenuation of dNTP pools. Nat Genet. 2003;34(4):440–445. doi: 10.1038/ng1212. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Viscomi C, et al. Early-onset liver mtDNA depletion and late-onset proteinuric nephropathy in Mpv17 knockout mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(1):12–26. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn309. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Zheng Z, et al. A Mendelian locus on chromosome 16 determines susceptibility to doxorubicin nephropathy in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(7):2502–2507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409786102. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Zheng Z, Pavlidis P, Chua S, D’Agati VD, Gharavi AG. An ancestral haplotype defines susceptibility to doxorubicin nephropathy in the laboratory mouse. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(7):1796–1800. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121373. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Mott R. A haplotype map for the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet. 2007;39(9):1054–1056. doi: 10.1038/ng0907-1054. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Dip R, Naegeli H. More than just strand breaks: the recognition of structural DNA discontinuities by DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit. FASEB J. 2005;19(7):704–715. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3041rev. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Staub E, Fiziev P, Rosenthal A, Hinzmann B. Insights into the evolution of the nucleolus by an analysis of its protein domain repertoire. Bioessays. 2004;26(5):567–581. doi: 10.1002/bies.20032. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Blunt T, et al. Defective DNA-dependent protein kinase activity is linked to V(D)J recombination and DNA repair defects associated with the murine scid mutation. Cell. 1995;80(5):813–823. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90360-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Kurimasa A, et al. Catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase: impact on lymphocyte development and tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(4):1403–1408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1403. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Araki R, et al. Nonsense mutation at Tyr-4046 in the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit of severe combined immune deficiency mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(6):2438–2443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2438. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. O’Bryan T, Weiher H, Rennke HG, Kren S, Hostetter TH. Course of renal injury in the Mpv17-deficient transgenic mouse. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(6):1067–1074. [PubMed]
40. Jhappan C, Morse HC 3rd, Fleischmann RD, Gottesman MM, Merlino G. DNA-PKcs: a T-cell tumour suppressor encoded at the mouse scid locus. Nat Genet. 1997;17(4):483–486. doi: 10.1038/ng1297-483. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. O’Driscoll M, Jeggo PA. The role of double-strand break repair - insights from human genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(1):45–54. [PubMed]
42. Franco S, Murphy MM, Li G, Borjeson T, Boboila C, Alt FW. DNA-PKcs and Artemis function in the end-joining phase of immunoglobulin heavy chain class switch recombination. J Exp Med. 2008;205(3):557–564. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080044. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Burma S, et al. DNA-dependent protein kinase-independent activation of p53 in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(24):17139–17143. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.24.17139. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. d’Adda di Fagagna F, et al. Effects of DNA nonhomologous end-joining factors on telomere length and chromosomal stability in mammalian cells. Curr Biol. 2001;11(15):1192–1196. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00328-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Ju BG, et al. A topoisomerase IIbeta-mediated dsDNA break required for regulated transcription. Science. 2006;312(5781):1798–1802. doi: 10.1126/science.1127196. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Wong RH, Chang I, Hudak CS, Hyun S, Kwan HY, Sul HS. A role of DNA-PK for the metabolic gene regulation in response to insulin. Cell. 2009;136(6):1056–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.040. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Jackson S, Gottlieb T, Hartley K. Phosphorylation of transcription factor Sp1 by the DNA-dependent protein kinase. Adv Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res. 1993;28:279–286. [PubMed]
48. Hossain MB, Ji P, Anish R, Jacobson RH, Takada S. Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 Interacts with Nuclear Respiratory Factor 1 (NRF-1) and Plays a Role in NRF-1 Transcriptional Regulation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(13):8621–8632. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807198200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Nock A, et al. Identification of DNA-dependent protein kinase as a cofactor for the forkhead transcription factor FoxA2. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(30):19915–19926. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.016295. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Woodard RL, Anderson MG, Dynan WS. Nuclear extracts lacking DNA-dependent protein kinase are deficient in multiple round transcription. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(1):478–485. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.1.478. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Ashley N, Poulton J. Anticancer DNA intercalators cause p53-dependent mitochondrial DNA nucleoid re-modelling. Oncogene. 2009;28(44):3880–3891. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.242. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Xia L, Jaafar L, Cashikar A, Flores-Rozas H. Identification of genes required for protection from doxorubicin by a genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cancer Res. 2007;67(23):11411–11418. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2399. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Kaplan JM, et al. Mutations in ACTN4, encoding alpha-actinin-4, cause familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet. 2000;24(3):251–256. doi: 10.1038/73456. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Winn MP, et al. A mutation in the TRPC6 cation channel causes familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Science. 2005;308(5729):1801–1804. doi: 10.1126/science.1106215. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Brown EJ, et al. Mutations in the formin gene INF2 cause focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):72–76. doi: 10.1038/ng.505. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Rotig A, Munnich A. Genetic features of mitochondrial respiratory chain disorders. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(12):2995–3007. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000095481.24091.C9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Yamagata K, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(7):1816–1823. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000019772.17954.F8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Eaton JS, Lin ZP, Sartorelli AC, Bonawitz ND, Shadel GS. Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase regulates ribonucleotide reductase and mitochondrial homeostasis. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(9):2723–2734. doi: 10.1172/JCI31604. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Mori C, Takanami T, Higashitani A. Maintenance of mitochondrial DNA by the Caenorhabditis elegans ATR checkpoint protein ATL-1. Genetics. 2008;180(1):681–686. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.090704. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Chang L, et al. ATM-mediated serine 72 phosphorylation stabilizes ribonucleotide reductase small subunit p53R2 protein against MDM2 to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(47):18519–18524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803313105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation