Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of ijbiInternational Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2011; 2011: 285130.
Published online 2010 October 26. doi:  10.1155/2011/285130
PMCID: PMC2964910

Inverse Fourier Transform in the Gamma Coordinate System

Yuchuan Wei, 1, 2 , * Hengyong Yu, 2, 3, 4 , , and Ge Wang 2, 4 ,


This paper provides auxiliary results for our general scheme of computed tomography. In 3D parallel-beam geometry, we first demonstrate that the inverse Fourier transform in different coordinate systems leads to different reconstruction formulas and explain why the Radon formula cannot directly work with truncated projection data. Also, we introduce a gamma coordinate system, analyze its properties, compute the Jacobian of the coordinate transform, and define weight functions for the inverse Fourier transform assuming a simple scanning model. Then, we generate Orlov's theorem and a weighted Radon formula from the inverse Fourier transform in the new system. Furthermore, we present the motion equation of the frequency plane and the conditions for sharp points of the instantaneous rotation axis. Our analysis on the motion of the frequency plane is related to the Frenet-Serret theorem in the differential geometry.

1. Introduction

In [1], we developed a general scheme for 2D and 3D, parallel- and divergent-beam computed tomography (CT). Different from traditional Radon's or Tuy's formulas starting with the inverse Fourier transform in the spherical coordinate system, our new framework is based on an instantaneous cylindrical coordinate system. However, in [1], the coordinate system was not formally defined, and the Jacobian of the transform was not explicitly calculated. Given the basic role of our general scheme in CT theory and some confusion in the literature [25], here, we treat the Γ coordinate system in a mathematically strict way.

The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we demonstrate how the inverse Fourier transform formula generates different reconstruction formulas, with a special attention on different properties of projection truncation. In Section 3, we define the Γ coordinate system and deduce its Jacobian factor. In Section 4, we study the motion of the frequency plane and present the condition for sharp points of the instantaneous rotation axis. In Section 5, a simplified model for helical CT reconstruction is given. In the appendixes, we present a weighted Λ reconstruction formula, a weighted Radon's formula, a deduction of Orlov's formula, and an alternative way to study the motion of the frequency plane. For convenience, we use the same notations as in [1].

2. Inverse Fourier Transform in Commonly Used Coordinate Systems

In this section, we write the inverse Fourier transform in commonly used coordinate systems, derive corresponding reconstruction formulas, and demonstrate their difference on truncation of projection data.

As shown in Figure 1, in the 3D space R3,Ψ(r) is an object function to be reconstructed, whose Fourier transform is Ψ^(k). According to Fourier analysis, we have


where r=(x,  y,  z) and k=(k1,k2,k3) are 3D vectors in the real space and Fourier domain, respectively. The unit vectors along the three axes are i,j, and k. Note that the frequency vector k and the unit vector k are different. This formula states that to reconstruct an 3D object Ψ(r), we need its Fourier transform Ψ^(k) in the whole 3D space. In X-ray CT, the Fourier transform Ψ^(k) can be calculated when sufficiently many parallel projections are measured.

Figure 1
3D reconstruction problem in parallel-beam geometry and the cylindrical coordinate system. (a) A parallel-beam scans an object along a semicircle locus on the unit sphere; (b) In the frequency domain, when ϕ 0 increases from 0 to π, the ...

Now, let us specify the simplest 3D reconstruction problem. In Figure 1(a), S(ϕ) = S(sin  ϕ, −cos  ϕ, 0) with ϕ [set membership] [0, π] is a point on a great semicircle of the unit sphere. In the 3D space, we define the unit vectors e=OS=(sinϕ,-cosϕ,0) and e=(cosϕ,sinϕ,0). Then, e,  e and k are another set of orthogonal unit vectors. As shown in Figure 1(c), the new components of the vector r can be denoted as


The projection at point S is defined by


Our purpose is to reconstruct Ψ(r) when P ϕ(ρ, z) is known for all ϕ [set membership] [0, π]. Let us see how the selection of a coordinate system will determine the reconstruction formula, paying an attention to longitudinal data truncation.

2.1. Signed Cylindrical Coordinate System

In a cylindrical coordinate system, the inverse Fourier transform can be rewritten as


where (k ρ, k 3, ϕ) with − < k ρ < , − < k 3 < , 0 ≤ ϕ < π is the signed cylindrical coordinates of k. As shown in Figure 1(b), we have


When ϕ 0 increases from 0 to π, the plane ϕ = ϕ 0 passes through every frequency point exactly once (except for the points on the axis O k 3 which have a zero measure), and the normal vector OS of the plane ϕ = ϕ 0 moves along a great semicircle on the unit sphere with the starting point A(0, −1,0) and the end point B(0,1, 0). Note that the coordinate transform from (k 1, k 2, k 3) to (k ρ, k 3, ϕ) is one to one (except for the points on the axis O k 3 with zero measure), and the absolute value of Jacobian is |k ρ|.

From the parallel projection P ϕ(ρ, z), we can calculate the Fourier transform of the object


Substituting (6) into (4), we have


The reconstruction scheme behind this formula can be denoted as


which indicates that we first calculate all the Fourier components from projections and then reconstruct the object using the inverse Fourier transform. In this process, the object is reconstructed as a whole body.

In fact, Formula (7) can be written in the filtered backprojection form as


where the filtered projection is given by


The symbol * denotes the 1D convolution operation about variable ρ. Since the filtration is along the horizontal direction only, the projection can be longitudinally truncated, that is, a plane with a specified z value can be reconstructed independently. The reconstruction scheme behind (9) with (10) can be denoted by


which states that certain frequency components form the projection, and the object can be reconstructed directly from projections.

When projections are longitudinally truncated, the Fourier transform cannot be calculated. How and why can we reconstruct a part of the object?

The answer is as follows. What we want to reconstruct is the object Ψ(r) instead of the Fourier transform Ψ^(k). Though we cannot calculate every single frequency component, we can calculate the contribution of the frequency components on the whole frequency plane (as well as its neighborhood) to a point to be reconstructed, see (10). In the aforementioned case, projections contain as all frequency components as the object does, but the ratio of the frequency components is not suitable. Then, the only thing we need to do is to perform a 1D filtration to adjust this ratio. An analog is that the Fourier components can be considered as raw material, projections a semifinished product, and the reconstructed object the final product. If we use the semifinished product to make a product, we do not need change it back to the raw material. The role of Fourier analysis is to tell us how far from the semifinished product to the final product. Simply speaking, the essence of image reconstruction from projections is filtration. Therefore, a suitable coordinate system should show the character of the filtration in an easy way.

2.2. Signed Spherical Coordinate System

In the signed spherical coordinate system shown in Figure 2, the inverse Fourier transform can be rewritten as

Figure 2
The sphere coordinate system and the detector plane. (a) The sphere coordinate system in the Fourier domain, and (b) the relationship between projections and the Radon transform.


where (k, [theta], ϕ) with − < k < , −π/2 < [theta] < π/2, 0 ≤ ϕ < π is the signed spherical coordinates of k.

For convenience, we denote k=k(k,ϑ,ϕ)=kn, where n=n(ϑ,ϕ)=e(ϕ)cosϑ+ksinϑ is a unit vector.

For a unit vector n=n(ϑ,ϕ), and a real number l [set membership] (−, ), the Radon transform of the object is defined as an integral


on the plane described by r·n=l.

The Fourier transform can be calculated from the Radon transform by


Thus, the inverse Fourier transform (12) becomes Radon's formula

Ψ(r)=14π20ππ/2π/22l2|l=r·nRΨ(l,n)cosϑdϑdϕ=14π220ππ/2π/2RΨ(l,n)|l=r·ncosϑdϑdϕ=18π22ΩRΨ(l,n)|l=r·n  dn,

where [nabla]2 is the Laplace operator, and Ω is the unit sphere.

Radon's formula tells us that to reconstruct the object at a point, what we need is the Radon transform of the planes through the point and its neighborhood. However, what we measure by the detector is line integrals along X-rays instead of the Radon transform [6] but it can be calculated from projections by


We call (16) the first relation between the Radon transform and parallel projection.

Formulas (15) and (16) form a scheme to reconstruct the object from its parallel projections. Here, the projection is not allowed to be longitudinally truncated. From Section 2.1, however, we have seen that the object can be reconstructed slice by slice from parallel projections. Why is the truncation not allowed when using the Radon formula?

For comparison, we rewrite Radon's formula in the filtered backprojection format



P˜ϕ(ρ,z)=π/2π/2Ψ^(k)exp(2πik·r)k2cosϑdkdϑ=14π2π/2π/2  2l2|l=r·n=ρcosϑ+zsinϑRΨ(l,n)cosϑdϑ.

Comparing (18) with (10), we have the following relation between the Radon transform and parallel-beam projections


We call this the second relation between the Radon transform and parallel-beam projections. Based on the relationship between fan-beam and parallel-beam projections [1], the right hand side of (19) can be expressed in terms of cone-beam projections as well.

Substituting (16) into (19), we get an identity of parallel projections


Now, we see that reconstruction of an object from parallel-beam projections does allow truncation of projection data but to verify the identity (20) needs the information on the whole projection domain. Reconstruction from parallel-beam projections using the Radon formula means numerically verifying this identity. We point out that if the projection P ϕ(ρ, z) is replaced by a general function with two variables, this identity holds true as well; see Appendix A.

Similarly, in cone-beam CT, reconstruction from cone-beam projections using the Radon formula, that is, the Grangeat's framework, means numerically verifying the cone-beam version of this identity. This is the reason why the Grangeat framework cannot deal with the long object problem.

We see that the Radon formula comes from the inverse Fourier transform in the signed spherical coordinate system. In this simplest reconstruction problem, there are two shortcomings with the Radon formula: (1) what we measure with X-ray is line integrals rather than planar integrals, (2) the projection cannot be longitudinally truncated.

2.3. Standard Spherical Coordinate System

In a standard spherical coordinate system, the inverse Fourier transform is written as


where (k, [theta], ϕ) with 0 ≤ k < , −π/2 < [theta] < π/2, 0 ≤ ϕ < 2π is the standard spherical coordinates of k, as shown in Figure 2.

From the well-known generalized function relations [7]


we have


Based on the convolution theorem, we have


Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform becomes


Based on the odd and even symmetry, we have the Radon formula again [6]


The difference between the signed and standard spherical coordinate systems is little, and the signed spherical coordinate system leads to Radon's formula more easily.

It is important to underline that the inverse Fourier transform may yield various reconstruct formulas in different coordinate systems and allow different degrees of data truncation. Among the commonly used coordinate systems, the signed cylindrical coordinate system is the most convenient one to solve the simplest 3D reconstruction problem. To handle the general 3D reconstruction problem, in the following we will introduce a variant of the signed cylindrical coordinate system, which is referred to as the Γ coordinate system.

3. Γ Coordinate System and Its Jacobian Factor

What plays an important role in the 3D reconstruction field is a variant of the cylindrical coordinate system, which can be named the Γ coordinate system.

As shown in Figure 3(b),  ΓAB is a three-times differentiable curve connecting points A(0,−1,0) and B(0,1,0) on the unit sphere, whose length is θ 0π.  S(θ) is a point on ΓAB parameterized by θ [set membership] [0, θ 0] the length of the segment AS. Let us introduce three orthogonal unit vectors

Figure 3
Nonuniqueness of the representation of a point in the Γ coordinates. (a) The Γ coordinate system, (b) a general curve ΓAB on the unit sphere, and (c) the intersections of ΓAB and the great circle orthogonal to a given vector ...


where e1 represents the tangential direction, e2 the instantaneous rotation axis of the frequency plane. Note that they are functions of θ=AS|de3| (see Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).

In the Fourier domain, we call the plane through the origin O and orthogonal to the vector OS the frequency plane, denoted as (OS). Every point k(OS) can be expressed as


with ω1=k·e1,    ω2=k·e2.

More generally, for every given triplet (ω 1, ω 2, θ) with ω 1 [set membership] (−, ),  ω 2 [set membership] (−, ),  θ [set membership] [0, θ 0], we can define a 3D vector


and the triplet (ω 1, ω 2, θ) is a set of Γ coordinates of the point k.

However, a given point kR3 may be represented by several sets of Γ coordinates, because when S(θ) moves along ΓAB, the rotation axis e2 keeps changing, and hence the frequency plane (OS) may scan the given point k more than once. The number of times of the point being scanned, denoted as J(k), equals the number of intersections between the curve ΓAB and the great circle orthogonal to the vector k (Figure 3(c)). To find the all intersections, one can solve the equation


to obtain the solutions θ1,  θ2,  ,θJ(k). For every solution, such as 1 θ, one can further have ω11=k·e1(θ1),  ω21=k·e2(θ1). Thus, one gets the J(k) groups of coordinates


We call this new system the Γ coordinate system, since the system is based on the curve ΓAB. This coordinate system is a variant of the cylindrical system. For a differential arc S S′, the new system is similar to a cylindrical coordinate system if the scanned volume is considered. When ΓAB is a great semicircle, the Γ coordinate system becomes the cylindrical coordinate system.

In the Γ coordinate system, the inverse Fourier transform can be expressed as


with k=ω1e1(θ)+ω2e2(θ). In [1], we obtained the absolute value of the Jacobian, |ω 1| for the coordinate transform from (k 1, k 2, k 3) to (ω 1, ω 2, θ), by similarity between the Γ coordinate system and the cylindrical system.

Based on (29) in the Γ coordinate system, the absolute value of the Jacobian factor can be calculated as follows:


where we have used the relations discussed in the next section

e3·ddθe1=1,  e3·ddθe2=0.

Then, a weight function W(ω 1, ω 2, θ) is defined for all the coordinates (ω 1, ω 2, θ), such that the summation of the weight function on the J(k) groups of coordinates of the same kR3 remains one, that is,

j=1J(k)W(ω1  j,ω2  j,θ  j)=1.

An example of the weight functions is [1, 8]


with k2=k·j=[ω1e1(θ)+ω2e2(θ)]·j.

With this weight function, (32) becomes a parallel-beam reconstruction formula from the Fourier slice theorem, and further Ye-Wang's cone-beam formula [8] via the relationship between parallel-beam and cone-beam projections [1]. With the weight function, the filtration is no longer along the tangential direction generally.

Clearly, the weight function is not unique. For instance, for frequency points with J(k)=3, in addition to the weight function defined by (36), (1 − 1 + 1), we can also choose (1/3+ 1/3+1/3), (0+1+0), or a more complicated one, (1 + 1 − 1) for some points and (−1 + 1 + 1) for the rest points, leading to different parallel-beam reconstruction formulas. Furthermore, using the approach described in [1], we can arrive at Katsevich's helical cone-beam formulas [911], and so forth.

If one takes the weight function W(ω 1, ω 2, θ) = 1 on the right side of (32), what we will reconstruct is actually another function


From (37), we observe that the reconstructed image Φ(r) equals the true object Ψ(r) if and only if J(k)=1, that is, the trajectory ΓAB is a great semicircle. The condition for Φ(r) to be an approximation of the object function, that is, Φ(r)Ψ(r), is that J(k)=1 in a major portion of the Fourier domain and J(k) is close to 1 in the rest region. Based on the relation between J(k) and the curve length of ΓAB, a necessary condition is θ 0π, or equivalently ε = θ 0/π − 1 ≈ 0. Otherwise, Φ(r) and Ψ(r)  will have a great difference. Unfortunately this formula was once thought as exact, which was essentially Theorem 3 in [2] and Theorem 4.3 in [3]. The details can be seen in [1].

Generally speaking, the criterion to identify exact formulas from approximate ones is to evaluate if every frequency component contributes exactly once to the final reconstruction, and the difference between exact formulas comes from different forms of weight functions.

4. Motion of the Frequency Plane and Condition for Sharp Points

In this section, we will study motion of the frequency plane, present the condition for sharp points of the locus of the rotation axis, and introduce the Euler angles. Let us simplify notations e˙3=(d/dθ)e3,e¨3=(d2/dθ2)e3, and so on. In this section, we assume that Γ is a three times differentiable curve on the unit ball, which may be not complete.

Obviously we have the following.

Proposition 1 —

For any point S(θ) [set membership] Γ, e1,e2,e3 defined by (27) are orthogonal unit vectors.

Definition 1 —

For every point S(θ) [set membership] Γ, let us define


which is the signed volume spanned by the three vectors e3,e˙3,e¨3. If we consider the curve length θ as time, e3,e˙3,e¨3 are the position, velocity, and the acceleration of point S.

Proposition 2 —

The motion of e1,e2,e3 can be described by the following differential equations


Proof —

The first equation is the definition. Now, let us prove the other two. Since e1,e2,e3 are orthogonal unit vectors, we can write


Applying d/d θ on the above equations, one has


Using the definition of σ, we have


Using the orthogonal unit vectors e1,e2,e3, e˙1 and e˙2 can be expressed as


which completes the proof.

From these differential equations, we recognize that the motion of e1,e2,e3 is a rotation in the 3D space.

Now, we consider the frequency plane Π(OS) fixed with e1,e2, e3 as a rigid body. When S(θ) moves along the curve Γ, the rigid body rotates in the 3D space.

Let us define


We will see that Ω is the angular velocity of the rigid body by the following proposition.

Proposition 3 —

The motion of the vectors e1,e2,e3 can be expressed as


Proof —

It is easy to verify the three equations one by one with Proposition 2 and the definition of Ω.

Proposition 4 —

The angular acceleration of the rigid body is


Proof —

In fact, we have


Proposition 5 —

For any point S(θ) [set membership] Γ, we have



Proof —

Let us first prove (48).

If σ = 0, by Proposition 2 we have e¨3=-e3. On the other hand, if e¨3=-e3, we have σ=e3·[e˙3×e¨3]=0.

Now, let us prove (49).

By Proposition 2, we have


Applying d/d θ to both sides of (50) and using σ˙=0, we have


On the other hand, if e3=-(σ2+1)e˙3, we have


This completes the proof. Physically, e3 is the change rate of the acceleration e¨3.

Proposition 6 —

σ = 0 for every point S(θ) [set membership] Γ, if and only if Γ is a great circle or a great arc.

Proof —

Since σ = 0 for every point S(θ) [set membership] Γ, the motion equation of the three unit vectors, (39), is simplified as


Since (d/dθ)e2=0 for every point, e2 is a fixed unit vector. Since (d/dθ)e3=e1=e2×e3, e3 rotates about the fixed axis e2. Since e3e2, S, the endpoint of e3, draws a great circle or a great arc; see Figure 4(a).

Figure 4
The circles on unit sphere and a helix in 3D space. (a) The illustration of σ = 0 and σ˙=0, (b) a circular locus on the unit sphere and the motion of the frequency plane, and (c) the helix in 3D space and the motion of its TNB ...

On the other hand, if Γ is a great circle or a great arc, one can verify that e¨3=-e3. Therefore, we have σ=e3·(e˙3×e¨3)=0. This completes the proof.

Proposition 7 —

σ˙=0 for every point S(θ) [set membership] Γ, if and only if Γ is a circle or a circular arc.

Proof —

Since σ˙=0, by Proposition 4 we have Ω˙=σ˙e3(θ)=0. We know that Ω is a fixed vector. By Proposition 3, we have


Therefore, e3 rotates about the fixed axis Ω, and S, the endpoint of e3, draws a circular arc. Furthermore, the radius of the circle is 1/1+σ2; see Figure 4(b).

On the other hand, if Γ is a circular arc, the line connecting the circle center and the origin O is the rotation axis. We know that e¨3 is pointing to the axis. By circular symmetry, σ=e3·(e˙3×e¨3) is constant at every point of the circular arc. Therefore, σ˙=0 on the circular arc. This completes the proof.

Clearly, Proposition 6 is a special case of Proposition 7; see Figure 4(a).

One important case is that σ=e3·(e˙3×e¨3)=0, for a certain point S(θ) [set membership] Γ. At such a moment, we have (d/dθ)e2=-σe1=0, the rotation axis of the frequency plane does not move, the point S moves along a great arc, and the Γ coordinate system is more similar to a cylindrical coordinate system. We say that θ is a stationary point of e2 if σ(θ) = 0. If σ has different signs before and after σ = 0, the stationary point will become a sharp point, since in this case e2 goes forward, stops and goes back according to (d/dθ)e2=-σe1. Therefore, we have the following straightforward proposition.

Proposition 8 —

A necessary condition for the curve e2(θ) to have a sharp point at θ 1 [set membership] (0, θ 0) is σ(θ 1) = 0; a sufficient condition for the curve e2(θ) to have a sharp point at θ 1 [set membership] (0, θ 0) is that σ(θ) has different signs for θ < θ 1 and for θ > θ 1.

Based on the definition of σ and the equation of the osculating plane, σ(θ 1) = 0 means that the osculating plane at S(θ 1) [set membership] Γ passes through the origin since (e3-0)·(e˙3×e¨3)=0.  σ(θ) changes its sign before and after θ 1 means that the osculating plane sweeps the origin, or relatively speaking, the origin goes from one side of the osculating plane to the other. An example can be seen in the next section. Sharp points serve as the landmarks for defining weight functions.

Proposition 9 —

For any given point on the frequency plane k=ω1e1+ω2e2, the motion equation is


Proof —

It is straightforward from Propositions 2 or 3.

We call (55) the motion equation of the frequency plane.

There are two applications of Proposition 9. First, it can be used to compute the Jacobian of the Γ coordinate system


Second, since


we know that among the three vectors k/ω1,   k/ω2,   k/θ, the last one is not orthogonal to the first two. Hence, a general Γ coordinate system is not orthogonal. Notice that k/θ=k/θ|ω1,ω2=dk/dθ.

Note that the frequency plane rotates about the axis e2 with the unit angular velocity while the vectors e1 and e2 themselves rotate about the axis e3 with the angular velocity σ; see Figure 5(a). We see that the Γ coordinate system is different from the cylindrical coordinate system in the motion process. However, since the spin about the axis e3 of the frequency plane does not have an effect on the scanned volume, their Jacobians have the same expression. Figure 5(b) shows the shape of a differential volume of the Γ coordinate system.

Figure 5
Differential motion of the frequency plane. (a) Two decomposed rotations and (b) one combined rotation.

Proposition 10 —

When S moves along a curve Γ on the unit sphere, the scanned volume in the unit ball by the frequency plane is


where θ 0 is the length of Γ, and J(k) is the number of times point k is scanned.

Proof —

In fact, the scanned volume can be calculated in both the Γ and the Cartesian coordinate systems as follows:


This completes the proof.

This concise formula provides a basic relation between the curve length, the scanned volume by the frequency plane, and the J function.

When we study the rotation problem, Euler angles ([theta], ϕ, δ) are helpful. As shown in Figure 6(a), ([theta], ϕ) with [theta] [set membership] (−π/2, π/2), ϕ [set membership] (−, ) are the spherical coordinate of S = S([theta], ϕ), δ is the angle between eϑ and e2. eϕ, and eϑ are the latitude and longitude unit vectors at point S in the spherical coordinate system.

Figure 6
Euler angles. (a) The Euler angles of the frequency plane and (b) the rotation angle of frequency plane relative to the detector plane.

The Euler angles are functions of the curve length


The three unit vectors can be represented as follows:


Furthermore, one can verify the motion equations of the three unit vectors in Proposition 2.

Based on the motion theory of rigid body, the angular velocity of a rigid body can be written as


Therefore, we have the following relationships:


where we have used a new notation


which is the first two terms of the total angular velocity Ω of (62).

In fact, Ω0 is the angular velocity of the detector with the unit vectors eϕ,eϑ when S moves along Γ. To be specific, we consider the detector for parallel-beam projection as a rectangle of finite width and length through the origin orthogonal to direction e3=OS. During any motion, one side of the detector always keeps horizontal, that is, parallel to the direction eϕ. The pose of the detector is completely determined by the point S = S([theta], ϕ), or two Euler's angles ([theta], ϕ). The relative motion of the frequency plane to the detector is described by the angle δ; see Figure 6(b).

In summary, there are three sets of orthogonal vectors (beside i,j,k, the unit vectors of the Cartesian coordinate system) and three important planes. The orthogonal unit vectors eϕ,eϑ, e3 are related to the movement of the detector and e3, e˙3=e1, e2=e3×e1 are related to the movement of the frequency plane, see Figure 6(b). It is easy to verify that Ω=e2+σe3=e1×e˙1 and hence the vectors e1, e˙1, Ω are the third set of orthogonal vectors. The direction of Ω is the normal of the osculating plane and its magnitude, 1+σ2, is the reciprocal of the radius of the osculating circle. Here the osculating plane is spanned by e1, e˙1 [15] and the osculating circle is referred to as the intersection between the osculating plane and the unit ball. When S moves along a curve Γ on the unit ball, it can be viewed that the point S moves along an osculating circle, whose orientation and radius are described by Ω. From Ω=e2+σe3, we can see that σ is an angular velocity of the spin of the frequency plane. The locus lengths of the endpoints of e3, e1, e2 are θ 0, 0θ01+σ2dθ, ∫0 θ0|σ|d θ, respectively, according to Proposition 2.

5. Example of a Curve with J(k)=1,3

Here, we discuss the reconstruction based on the simplified model of the 3D helical cone beam reconstruction, that is, 3D helical parallel-beam reconstruction.

The curve C in R 3 defined by


is a segment of a helix with radius r and pitch h, which is shown in Figure 7 for r = 1, h = 3.

Figure 7
Motion process of the frequency plane. The red curve is a segment of a helical scanning trajectory. The blue curve is its projection on the unit sphere. The black curve is the great circle through S 1  , S 3, and S 5. Five positions of ...

In fact, it is formed by a combination of a uniform circular motion in the XOY plane and a uniform straight motion along the Z direction.

The projection of the curve C on the unit sphere Ω is




The curve length θ can be given by


For example, we can calculate θ 0 = θ(π/2) ≈ 3.177 and ε = 0.011, when r = 1 and h = 3, indicating that the overlapping degree in the Fourier domain is small.

For every [var phi] [set membership] [−π/2, π/2], the three orthogonal unit vectors are


The inverse Fourier transform can be expressed with either the Γ coordinates (ω 1, ω 2, θ) or the new coordinates (ω 1, ω 2, [var phi])




To visualize the motion of the frequency plane (OS), its five positions are marked in Figure 7 at [var phi] 1 = −π/2, [var phi] 2 = −π/4, [var phi] 3 = 0, [var phi] 4 = π/4 and [var phi] 5 = π/2, respectively. Note that the initial position Π(OS1) and the final position Π(OS5) coincide with each other.

In Figure 7, the two curved sides of the red triangle on the top of the unit sphere is the locus of e3, the instantaneous rotation axis of the frequency plane. Similarly, -e2 and Π(OS1) form the counterpart triangle on the bottom of the unit sphere. The locus of e2 is the division line of the regions with different J(k) values. Based on (58), the total area of the two triangles is only 0.55% of the surface area of the unit sphere.

Note that a sharp point on the locus of e2 appears at [var phi] = [var phi] 3 = 0. The reason is as follows.

Let us define


It can be verified that σ 0(0) = 0, σ 0([var phi]) < 0 for [var phi] < 0, and σ 0([var phi]) > 0 for [var phi] > 0.

It is not difficult to prove

σ=e3·(e1×e˙1)=y(φ)·(ddφy(φ)×d2dφ2y(φ))1|y(φ)|  ×1|(d/dφ)y(φ)|2(dφdθ)3=σ0(φ)K(φ),

where K([var phi]) is positive. Therefore, σ and σ 0 have the same zeros and sign.

Based on the motion process of   Π(OS), we have

J(k)={1,k  outside  the  two  triangles,3,k  inside  the  two  triangles.

The overlapped region in the frequency space is due to the motion of the instantaneous rotation axis e2 of the frequency plane, or equivalently the discrepancy between the curve Γ and half a great circle.

As shown in Figure 8, the weight factor can be (1 − 1 + 1), (1/3+ 1/3+1/3), or (0+1+0), and so forth, for the overlapped region. By dividing the overlapped region into 2 symmetric parts, one can define the weight function as (−1 + 1 + 1) on the left side and (1 + 1 − 1) on the right side, or (1 − 1 + 1) on the left and (1 + 1 − 1) on the right, and so forth. Hence, one can design various parallel-beam reconstruction formulas and derive the associated cone-beam formulas using the approach described in [1].

Figure 8
Examples of possible weight factors. (a) 1 − 1 + 1, (b) 1/3+1/3+1/3, (c) 0+1+0, and (d) −1 + 1 + 1 for the left half, 1 + 1 − 1 for the right half, (e) 1 − 1 + 1 for the left half, and 1 + 1 − 1 for the right half. ...


The works of H. Yu and G. Wang are partially supported by the NSF/MRI Program (no. CMMI-0923297) and NIH/NIBIB Grant (no. EB011785). The authors also thank a reviewer for a valuable suggestion.


A. Weighted Λ Reconstruction Formula

f(x, y) is a function in the 2D space with the Fourier transform


Its parallel-beam projection is denoted as


with l [set membership] (−, ), [theta] [set membership] [−π/2, π/2].

Let f(x, y) pass through the filter |k 1|, we get a new function


Defining the signed polar coordinates (k ρ, [theta]) with k ρ [set membership] (−, ), [theta] [set membership] (−π/2, π/2), which satisfy k 1 = k ρcos [theta], k 2 = k ρsin [theta], we have


Comparing (A.3) and (A.4), we have


That is, we have rediscovered the identity (20) in a general way. In contrast to the classical Λ reconstruction formula [1], a weight factor cos [theta] is involved in (A.5). Hence, we can call (A.5) a weighted Λ reconstruction formula.

B. A Weighted Radon Formula and the Orlov Formula

Let us define


and the parallel-beam projection is


as shown in Figure 6(b). In the frequency plane Π(OS), we define a signed polar coordinate system (ω, α) with ω [set membership] (−, ), α [set membership] [0, π] for a point (ω 1, ω 2) with ω 1 = ωcos α, ω 2 = ωcos α. Similarly, let us define the signed polar coordinates (X, β) with X [set membership] (−, ), β [set membership] [−π/2, π/2] for a point (t, s) with t = Xcos β, s = Xsin β.

Let the weight function in (32) be W(ω 1, ω 2, θ) = W(α, θ), we have


with n=e1cosα+e2sinα.

We call it the weighted Radon formula. When ΓAB is a great semicircle, we have W(α, θ) = 1 and θ 0 = π, and the above formula becomes the classic Radon formula [12, 13].

Moreover, it is easy to rederive Orlov's formula [14] from (32)




The sign ** denotes the 2D convolution operation.

We recall that a frequency point has J(k) sets of Γ coordinates

k=k(ω1,  1ω2,  1θ  1)=k(ω1,  2ω2  2,θ  2)==k(ω1,  J(k)ω2,  J(k)θ  J(k)).

If a given triplet (ω 1, ω 2, θ) is the jth set of Γ coordinates of k,

(ω1,ω2,θ)=(ω1,  jω2  j,θ  j),

a new normalized weight function [1] for the triplet can be defined by

W(ω1,ω2,θ)=W(α,θ)=1/|k·e1(θ  j)|j=1J(k)1/|k·e1(θ  j)|=1/|cosα|j=1J(k0)1/|k0·e1(θ  j)|,

and in this case we have

gθ(t,s)=1|X|1j=1J(k0)1/|k0·e1(θ  j)||k0=e3×X0.

Here, k0=k/|k|, and X0=(te1+se2)/t2+s2=e1cosβ+e2sinβ are unit vectors.

Equation (B.4) with (B.9) is the Orlov formula for a general curve on the unit sphere ((2a) with (2c) in [14]). Note that in [14] different letters were used such as mk0, τe3, τ˙e1, x(te1+se2), |x||X|, GdGτ0θ0dθ, and so forth, and τ˙k should be printed as τ˙k.

C. Link between the Motion of the Frequency Plane and Differential Geometry

To study the property of a curve Γ on the unit sphere and the associated motion of the frequency plane, one can introduce another curve, Γ˜, defined as


where r(0) is an arbitrary vector in the 3D space, and θ (as well as θ′) is an arc-length parameter of the curve Γ. Clearly,


Suppose that the arc-length parameter of the curve Γ˜ is s. The tangential direction of the curve Γ˜ is


Furthermore, we have


where |(d/ds)r|=|dr/ds|=|dr|/ds=ds/ds=1 has been used.

When the positive directions are the same, we have


Picking up the constant s 0 = 0, we have θ = s. Therefore, the symbol θ represents the arc length parameters of both Γ˜ and Γ. Based on the tangential direction T, the norm and binormal unit vectors [15] can be defined as


The curvature κ and the torsion τ of the curve Γ˜ are


and the Darboux vector is


The Frenet-Serret Equations of the curve Γ˜




are (39) and (45). In this frame, r(θ) is the original curve (function), and e3(θ) becomes its derived curve (function). In practice, it is difficult to find the physical meaning of the 3D curve r(θ).

Example C —

A circle on the unit sphere and its corresponding curve in the 3D space.

As shown in Figure 4(b), a circle on the unit sphere, marked as C, can be described as


with a fixed parameter [theta] 0 [set membership] (−π/2, +π/2) and a variable ϕ [set membership] [0,2π].

Using the arc-length parameter θ [set membership] [0,2πcos [theta] 0], we have


Furthermore, we have


Based on the definition (C.1), the corresponding 3D curve C˜ is


with the choice r(0)=-jcos2ϑ0.

Now, we see that C˜ is a helix, whose standard form is


with a = cos 2 [theta] 0,   b = sin [theta] 0cos [theta] 0,   ϕ [set membership] [0,2π] (see Figure 4(c)). Its curvature and torsion are


The length of the helix C˜ for ϕ [set membership] [0,2π] is 2πa2+b2=2πcosϑ0, which is equal to the circumference of circle C on the unit sphere. The radius of the helix C˜(a=cos2ϑ0) is smaller than that of the circle C(cos [theta] 0). The figure is not drawn to scale. The TNB frame rotates around the z direction at a constant velocity



1. Wei Y, Yu H, Hsieh J, Cong W, Wang G. Scheme of computed tomography. Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology. 2007;15(4):235–270.
2. Palamodov VP. Reconstruction from ray integrals with sources on a curve. Inverse Problems. 2004;20(1):239–242.
3. Palamodov VP. Reconstructive Integral Geometry. Boston, Mass, USA: Birhauser; 2004.
4. Yu H, Ye Y, Zhao S, Wang G. Studies on Palamodov’s algorithm for cone-beam CT along a general curve. Inverse Problems. 2006;22(2):447–460.
5. Yu H, Ye Y, Zhao S, Wang G. Reply to the comment on ’studies on Palamodov’s algorithm for cone-beam CT along a general curve’ Inverse Problems. 2006;22(4):1505–1506.
6. Ramm AG, Katsevich AI. The Radon Transform and Local Tomography. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press; 1996.
7. Gel'fand IM, Shilov GE. Generalized functions: Volume 1. Vol. 1. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; 1977.
8. Yangbo Y, Wang G. Filtered backprojection formula for exact image reconstruction from cone-beam data along a general scanning curve. Medical Physics. 2005;32(1):42–48. [PubMed]
9. Katsevich A. A general scheme for constructing inversion algorithms for cone beam CT. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences. 2003;2003(21):1305–1321.
10. Katsevich A. Theoretically exact filtered backprojection-type inversion algorithm for spiral CT. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2002;62(6):2012–2026.
11. Katsevich A. Improved exact FBP algorithm for spiral CT. Advances in Applied Mathematics. 2004;32(4):681–697.
12. Radon J. Über die Bestimmung von Funktionen durch ihre Integralwerte längs gewisser Mannigfaltigkeiten. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften. 1917;69:267–277.
13. Parks PC. On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 1986;5(4):170–176. [PubMed]
14. Orlov S. Theory of three dimensional reconstruction: II. The recovery operator. Soviet Physics—Crystallography. 1975;20(4):429–433.
15. Pressley AN. Elementary Differential Geometry. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2001. (Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series).

Articles from International Journal of Biomedical Imaging are provided here courtesy of Hindawi