|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Scientific theories take centuries to come into existence and they keep on evolving. Uncountable intellectual minds work on these theories; some fail to do anything about it; some add a little after tremendous efforts, and some people give remarkable and unforgettable contribution.
As far as credit is concerned, the person who is able to prove the theory by his facts and who clears the maximum doubts by his observations, experimentations, facts and reasoning, gets the credit for that theory, and this should be done with honesty.
The theory of pulmonary circulation took more than 2000 years to come into existence as we know it today. With the passage of time different people were given credit. Some say that it was given to Galen; some say it was Michael Servetus; others say that Realdus Columbus was the real discoverer; some gave the credit to Ibn Nafis, and finally people gave the credit to William Harvey. But after the rediscovery of Ibn Nafis’ manuscript no.62243 titled Sharah al Tashreeh al Qanoon, or “Commentary on the anatomy of Canon of Avicenna” in 1924 AD in Europe, it became clear that Ibn Nafis had described the pulmonary circulation almost 300 years before Harvey, and the historians like Aldo Mieli, Max Mayrhoff, Edward Coppola etc. clearly state that Ibn Nafis is the real discoverer of the pulmonary circulation and that he should be given the credit for the discovery of the pulmonary circulation.
When we eat a piece of bread, do we ever think for a moment how many people worked to bring it to us – from soaking a small seed to the formation of flour and then into a bread. It is just a matter of one or two years. But scientific theories take centuries to come into existence and they keep on changing; uncountable intellectual minds work on these theories. Some fail to do anything about it; some add a little after tremendous efforts, and some people give remarkable and unforgettable contribution.
As far as credit is concerned – “who was the first” – the best in the series of events gets the credit for the theory. But the person who gets the credit is not the only one who thought in that direction, but, he is the only one who is able to prove the theory by the facts and who clears the maximum doubts by his observations, facts and reasoning, although he is just a small part of that chain.
The same is true in the case of the discovery of the pulmonary circulation. There are so many names who contributed in this regard. But the person who clears the maximum doubts with the least resources should be given the real credit. As far as the discovery of pulmonary circulation is concerned, there is a series of people to whom credit was given by different people. Like, some say, it was Galen (129-200AD) who discovered the pulmonary circulation; some say it was Ibn Nafis (1210-1288AD) who conceived the idea; still some thought that Michael Servetus (1511-1553AD) was the real one and some thought about Realdus Columbus (1516-1559AD) and finally, the people of the modern era gave the real credit to William Harvey (1578-1657AD).
Here we will attempt to identify to whom actual credit for discovering the pulmonary circulation should be given to by comparing their postulates and contributions to the theory of the pulmonary circulation.
The table below summarizes the physicians throughout history who contributed to our understanding of the pulmonary circulation. It really starts with Hippocrates and ends with Marcello Malpighi…
|Hippocrates (Buqrat)||460-377 BC|
|Aristotle (Arastu)||384-322 BC|
|Erasistratus (Aerasistratoos)||290 BC|
|Galen (Jalinus)||129-200 BC|
|Annafis (Ibne Nafis)||1210-1288 AD|
|M. Servetus||1511-1553 AD|
|Andreas Vesalius||1514-1564 AD|
|Realdus Columbus||1516-1559 AD|
|Fabricius de Aquapendente||1537-1619 AD|
|William Harvey||1578-1657 AD|
|Marcelo Malpighi||1628-1698 AD|
Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine, believed that the liver and the spleen were the central organs within which blood travelled to the heart to be warmed or cooled by the air entering the lungs and the heart via the trachea.
Attributed three ventricular chambers to the heart; he named the main artery of the heart as Aorta.
Arteries contain air. He said air from the lungs goes to the heart and changes into vital spirit. He gave the names of vessels, like artery, vein, pulmonary artery and pulmonary vein, etc.
Concept of reverse circulation: “The blood which oozes out through artery when cut comes from veins through very small vessels between artery and vein”.
In his book “De Usu Partium” Galen wrote: Arteries carried blood instead of air. Veins as well as arteries both carry blood towards the extremities. According to Galen, there were two kinds of blood: Spiritual blood (arterial blood, present in left heart); venous blood (present in right heart). Spiritual blood nourishes light and delicate texture organs e.g. lungs, and venous blood nourishes those of heavy and gross texture organs e.g. liver.
About arteries he said that they have the property to pulsate i.e. pulsative faculty or pulsific virtue. There are certain openings in the interventricular septum through which some amount of blood goes from right side to left side of the heart. Galen placed the seat of sanguification in the liver. [Sanguification = conversion of blood = hematopoiesis - Ed.]
Galen believed that blood was propelled inside the vessels by attraction from peripheral tissues in need of nutrition (he did not recognized the pumping action of the heart). Galen believed that blood perfuse into the organs like water in irrigating fields.
Galen could not explain how blood produced in the liver and carried to the right heart by vena cava reached the left heart so that it could be distributed to the arterial tree.
Galen had a good notion of the aortic, pulmonary and cardiac valves and said that arteries and veins communicate by common openings which are invisible and extremely narrow.
Ala ad-Din Abu al-Hasan Ali Ibn Abi-Hazm-al-Qarshi known as Ibn Nafis Damishqi, was born in a small town near Damascus called Qarsh. He is considered as the Father of Circulatory Physiology. In 1236 AD he moved to Egypt, worked in Almansouri Hospital and became the chief of physicians and the Sultan’s personal physician there. He wrote many books in medicine but his most famous book was Sharah al Tashreeh al Qanoon (Commentary on anatomy of the Canon of Avicenna). This book was forgotten until 1924 when an Egyptian physician, Dr M. Altatawi discovered manuscript No.62243 titled “Commentary on the anatomy of the Canon of Avicenna” in the Prussian state Library in Berlin, Germany. This book contains the first description of the pulmonary circulation.
Michael Servatus or in Spanish, Miguel Serveto, a Spanish anatomist and theologian, in his theological book “Christianismi Resstitutio” in 1553 wrote: “air mixed with blood that is sent from the lungs to the heart through the arterial vein; therefore, the mixture is made in the lungs. The bright color is given to the sanguine spirit by the lungs, not by the heart.
“The communication does not take place through the median partition of the ventricle, as is generally supposed, but by a long and wonderful route; the blood is conducted through the lungs where it is agitated and prepared and where it becomes yellow and passes from arterial vein into the venous artery”. Blood goes to lungs not only for nourishing it but also for air mixing.
Since the book was a theological work and condemned by most of the Christian factions of his time, he was burnt alive at the stake, in Geneva in 1553 AD, on order given by John Calvin, the French Protestant theologian. It also seems doubtful that this concept of the pulmonary circulation was from his own observations. He might have come across the writings of Ibn Nafis while he was assistant professor to Prof. John Guinter who translated most of Galen’s work and those of other physicians from antiquity as well as several Arabic manuscripts of the Middle Ages into Latin.
Six years after Servetus, one of the best Anatomists in Padua University, an Italian physician, Realdus Colombus, discovered again and independently the pulmonary circulation. He said in his book De Re Anatomica in 1559 AD “between these ventricles there is a septum through which almost everyone believes that there opens a pathway for the blood from the right ventricle to the left ventricle and the blood is rendered thin so that this may be done more easily for the generation of vital spirits, but, they are in great error, ......”
His theory of pulmonary circulation was probably based on Servetus writings but does not cite Servetus.
An Italian physician, philosopher, and most distinguished botanist of his time, he studied at University of Pisa. He also described the pulmonary circulation without knowing Realdus Colombus. Caesalpinus formally named the passage of the blood from the right side of the heart to the left side via the lungs, the circulation.
Caesalpinus was the first and only one who has drawn attention towards the swelling of the vein which takes place below and never above a ligature.
He was an Italian surgeon and anatomist and studied at the University of Padua. He was the teacher of Harvey. He discovered valves of veins which he described in his book De venarum ostiolis.
He is said to be the father of modern anatomy. He also described in his book De Fabrica humani corporis, the pulmonary circulation in a manner similar to Ibn Nafis. More importantly and interestingly in the first edition of his book, Vesalius agreed with Galen that blood “soaks plentifully through the septum from the right ventricle into the left”. But in the second edition, he omitted the above statement and instead wrote “I still do not see how even the smallest quantity of blood can be transfused through the substance of the septum from the right ventricle to the left ventricle.”
It is said that Harvey in 1616 AD expounded on those original and complete views of the circulation of the blood and in 1628 AD he gave his views to the world in his celebrated treatise “Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus” (an anatomical study of the motion of the heart and of the blood in animals.
In his treatise [Harvey’s] he proved:
Harvey was not able to recognize the capillary channels by which the blood passes from the arteries to the veins. However he did not understand the physiology of the pulmonary circulation-dissipation of the CO2 and replacement with O2 which was fully elucidated by Lavoisier in the 18th century.
He discovered capillaries in 1660-61 and thereby discovering the capillary circulation. So, therefore, he solved the millennia-old mystery of how blood goes from the arteries to the veins.
At this point we can try to answer the question: Who was the real discoverer of the pulmonary circulation? There are four possible contenders:
“We believe that henceforth it is fair to attribute the discovery of the pulmonary circulation to Ibn Nafis who was a distant precursor of the physicians of the sixteenth century Italian school and of William Harvey who, four centuries later, described the whole of the pulmonary circulation in an accurate, clear and definitive manner.
A distinguished scholar of the history of Arabic Medicine stated: “We have seen that Ibn Nafis, three centuries before Colombus, had already noticed visible passages between the two types of pulmonary vessels.”
In the William Osler Medical Essay on the discovery of the pulmonary circulation, Edward Coppola said: “The theory of pulmonary circulation propounded by Ibn Nafis in the 13th century was not forgotten and that centuries after his death it may have influenced the direction of the anatomical investigations of Colombo and Valverde, who finally announced it to the Western world as a physiological fact susceptible to experimental proof.
Sami Haddad from Lebanon published an article in the annuals of surgery in 1936 AD about Ibn Nafis and other articles were also published by Ayman et al and Dr Abdul Karim Shahadah from Syria which showed clearly that Ibn Nafis should be given the credit for the discovery of the pulmonary circulation 300 years before even William Harvey was born.
Dr Abdul Rehman in his article, titled “the discovery of the blood circulation” also proved it: “In 1242 Ibn Nafis was the first to describe human blood circulation and pulmonary circulation.”
Thus, in agreement with Sarton, it is evident from this study that Ibn Nafis is the greatest physiologist of the Middle Ages and the main forerunner of Servetus, Vesalius, Columbus and Harvey in the description of the pulmonary circulation as we know it today. He was also a talented physician and a gifted medical writer. His discoveries and medical works greatly contributed to the progress of medical knowledge and the advancement of medical practice. His influence on the generation of doctors and scholars, who came after him both in the East and West, is well documented up to the 17th Century.
So it is clear enough to understand, by the statements of so many intellectuals and modern historians that without any confusion Ibn Nafis should be given the credit for the discovery of the pulmonary circulation.