PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Neurosci Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC Oct 4, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2962987
NIHMSID: NIHMS229052
Screening for inhibitors of the SOD1 gene promoter: pyrimethamine does not reduce SOD1 levels in cell and animal models
Paul D Wright,1 Mickey Huang,2 Alexandra Weiss,1 Jonathan Matthews,1 Nicholas Wightman,1 Marcie Glicksman,2 and Robert H Brown, Jr1
1 University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Neurology, Worcester, MA 01655
2 Laboratory for Drug Discovery in Neurodegeneration, Harvard NeuroDiscovery Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139
Corresponding author: Paul Wright, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Neurology, LRB 640C, Worcester, MA 01655, Tel: 508-856-6688, Fax: 508- 856-6750, paul.wright/at/umassmed.edu
Mutations in the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1) gene are detected in 20% of familial and 3% of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases. Although mutant SOD1 is known to induce motor neuron death via multiple adverse acquired functions, its exact pathogenic mechanism is not well defined. SOD1 toxicity is dose dependent; levels of mutant SOD1 protein in transgenic mice determine disease susceptibility, onset and rate of progression. We therefore sought to identify small molecules that reduce SOD1 levels by inhibiting the SOD1 promoter. We tested pyrimethamine (previously reported to suppress SOD1 expression), several compounds currently in trials in human and murine ALS, and a set of 1,040 FDA-approved compounds. In a PC12 cell-based assay, no compounds reduced SOD1 promoter activity without concomitant cytotoxicity. Additionally, pyrimethamine failed to repress levels of SOD1 protein in HeLa cells or homogenates of liver, spinal cord and brain of wild-type mice. 34 compounds (including riluzole, ceftriaxone, minocyclin, PBA, lithium, acetylcysteine) in human and mouse ALS trials and an additional set of 1,040 FDA approved compounds also showed no effect on SOD1 promoter activity. This present study thus failed to identify small molecule inhibitors of SOD1 gene expression.
Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral Sclerosis, SOD1, superoxide dismutase, assay, compound screening, Pyrimethamine
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an age-dependent, neurodegenerative disease characterized pathologically by the selective loss of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord. Symptoms of muscle weakness, cramp or spasticity begin in a single limb but become generalized, and death, due to respiratory failure, occurs within three to five years. ALS is uniformly fatal. The single FDA-approved treatment for ALS (Riluzole) increases lifespan by only three to six months and does not substantially alleviate symptoms [1]. The majority of ALS cases are sporadic but approximately 10% are familial. Mutations in the genes encoding FUS/TLS [2], [3], TDP-43 [4], angiogenin [5] and cytosolic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1) [6] have been shown to cause ALS. The most extensively studied of these genes is SOD1.
To date nearly 150 ALS-associated mutations have been reported in SOD1 [7]. Most are missense mutations, which occur throughout the protein. Through multiple mechanisms that remain fully to be defined, SOD1 mutations are pathogenic; data overwhelmingly supports the view that mutant SOD1 protein has acquired adverse cytotoxic properties. SOD1 knockout mice show no overt phenotype [8], whereas mice over-expressing mutant SOD1 develop progressive paralysis and death due to motor neuron loss [9]. Importantly, transgenic mice and rats expressing high levels of mutant SOD1 develop a disease phenotype but those expressing at a lower level do not [9] [10]. This evidence, along with the findings that siRNA directed against SOD1 prolong survival in mice [11] lead us to investigate the possibility that a reduction in SOD1 levels could attenuate ALS susceptibility and the rate of disease progression. To test this hypothesis, we developed a cell based screen for small molecules capable of inhibiting the SOD1 promoter [12], thereby reducing levels of mutant SOD1 protein. Mutant SOD1 is thought to act in both a cell autonomous and a non-cell autonomous manner [13], [14], [15]. Reduction of levels of mutant SOD1 in motor neurons delays onset of paralysis in transgenic ALS mice [16] while diminished levels of mutant SOD1 in astrocytes and microglial cells delays microglial activation and slows disease progression after onset [17]. Thus, the potential benefits of compounds that suppress SOD1 expression may be mediated by motor neurons and surrounding non-neuronal cells. We note that there is a precedent for a beneficial influence of induced gene repression in a transgenic model of Huntington’s disease [18].
For these reasons, we have developed screening assays to identify compounds that inhibit expression of the SOD1 gene. Our studies focused initially on pyrimethamine, several compounds currently in trials in human and murine ALS and a set of 1,040 FDA-approved compounds. We elected to study pyrimethamine in detail because this compound has previously been reported to reduce SOD1 protein levels in lymphocytes of ALS patients by up to 60% [19]. Pyrimethamine (5-(4-chlorophenyl)-6-ethyl-2,4-pyrimidinediamine) is an anti-protozoal drug whose primary mode of action involves the preferential inhibition of protozoal dihydrofolate reductase [20]. It also induces peripheral blood lymphocyte apoptosis via activation of caspase 8- and caspase 10-dependent cascades, leading to mitochondrial depolarization [21]. How pyrimethamine might reduce activity of the SOD1 gene is not clear.
Cell Culture
A PC12 cell line, stably expressing 2.2Kb of the SOD1 promoter region flanked by the gene encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) was maintained in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, USA) with 10% (v/v) horse serum, 5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1x penicillin, 1x streptomycin and 500μg/mL G418 (Invitrogen, USA) at 37°C with 5% CO2 [12]. HeLa cells were maintained in DMEM (Gibco, USA) with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1x penicillin and 1x streptomycin at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Animal experiments
C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories, USA) aged 8–10 weeks were treated with 10mg/kg/d pyrimethamine (based on [22]) or PBS. Treatments were administered by Intraperitoneal (IP) injections for 14 days. After this mice were euthanized by CO2 followed by decapitation. Brain, spinal cord and liver were removed. Samples were homogenized using 20mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 2mM DTT, 1mM EGTA, 1mM EDTA and 1x protease inhibitors (Roche, Switzerland). Homogenates were sonicated on ice at 20% for 10 seconds using a Sonic-dismembrator Model 500 (Fisher, USA). Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA protein assay kit (Thermo, USA). 20μg of total protein was loaded onto gels and electrophoresis and western blotting were carried out as described below. Experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Compound Screening
Large numbers of PC12 cells were generated using Corning® CellSTACK Culture Chambers (Sigma, USA). 200μL of cells (250 cells/μL) were plated into 96 well black-well/clear bottom plates (Perkin Elmer, USA) using the Multidrop 384 (ThermoScientific, USA) automated cell plater. Cells were typically incubated for one hour to allow attachment. For the US Drug Collection Library (MicroSource, USA) 0.5μL of 1mM stock was added to each well giving a final concentration of 2.5μM. For dose response curves compounds were added to final concentrations of 25μM, 10μM, 2.5μM, 1μM, 0.25μM, 0.1μM, 0.025μM, 0.01μM, 0.0025μM, 0.001μM, 0.00025μM and 0.0001μM. In each case 0.5μL was added to each well of a 96 well plate using Biomek FX liquid handling platform (Beckman Coulter, USA).
Cells were incubated for 72 hours at 37°C, conditions previously shown to give optimal assay conditions [12]. For measurements of GFP fluorescence, plates were washed in TBS, and then lysed with 200μl RIPA buffer (150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% SDS, 40mM Tris-HCl). Fluorescence levels were determined using the EnVision 2102 Multilabel plate reader (Perkin Elmer, USA), excitation 485nm, emission 535nm. Compound toxicity analysis was gauged by determining levels of ATP, as a measure of cell viability, using the luminescence based Cell Titre-Glo assay (Promega, USA). Cells were treated and processed as above and luminescence was measured on the EnVision 2102 Multilabel plate reader (Perkin Elmer, USA).
Western Blotting
HeLa cells were plated into 6-Well plates at a dilution of 200 cells/μL. Once cells were attached, pyrimethamine (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to a final concentration of 25μM, 2.5μM or 0.25μM. Cells were incubated for 72 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were washed with PBS, then lysed in 300μL of RIPA buffer. Lysates were sonicated on ice at 20% for 10 seconds. Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA protein assay kit (Thermo, USA) and 10μg of protein lysate was loaded onto gels. For gel electrophoresis 12% Tris-Glycine gels were used (Invitrogen, USA) and run at 125V for 90 minutes using Tris-Glycine SDS running buffer (Invitrogen, USA). Samples were transferred to nitrocellulose using the i-Blot® (Invitrogen, USA). Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked using blocking solution (LiCor, USA) and probed for SOD1 using a sheep anti-SOD1 antibody (Binding Site, UK) and a rabbit anti-actin antibody (Sigma, USA). IR labeled secondaries were used (LiCor, USA) and blots visualized/analyzed using the Odyssey Imaging System (LiCor, USA).
Statistics
Dose response curves were fitted using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad, USA). For each data set ‘log (agonist) vs response - variable slope’ was used, which uses the equation Y=Bottom + (Top-Bottom)/(1+10^((LogEC50-X)*HillSlope)). For T-test analysis Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, USA) was used. For ANOVA analysis GraphPad Prism was used. In each case a p-value of 0.05 was assigned to ascertain a statistically significant difference.
Effects of pyrimethamine on SOD1-promoter and SOD1 protein levels
To investigate the effect of pyrimethamine on the SOD1 promoter, this drug was added to our stable PC12 cell lines that express GFP under the control of the human SOD1 promoter. In these cells, fluorescence levels directly indicate promoter activity. Using a 12 point dose curve (25μM - 0.0001μM) we observed a 42% reduction in the level of GFP relative to the DMSO treated controls at the highest dose tested. This was associated with a 68% reduction in general cell viability, as indicated by a decrement in ATP. We thus conclude that the pyrimethamine-induced reduction in SOD1 promoter activity was a consequence of non-specific toxicity (Figure 1). When dose-response curves are fitted (GraphPad Prism, USA) the respective EC50 and LD50 values obtained using PC12 cells are 9.2 μM and 2.8 μM, confirming inhibition of SOD1 by pyrimethamine is likely to be a non-specific consequence of cytotoxicity. In addition, we also analyzed the effect of pyrimethamine on endogenous SOD1 in HeLa cells. When normalized to the DMSO controls, the pyrimethamine-treated cells, at all concentrations tested, showed no differences in SOD1 protein levels (Figure 2). One way analysis of variance between the DMSO and each concentration tested produced a p value of 0.95, indicating no significant difference between the means. Addition of pyrimethamine to HeLa cells also produced a significant level of toxicity; exposures to 2.5 and 25 μM lead respectively to 41% and 72% reductions in viability.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Dose response curves illustrate the effect of pyrimethamine on SOD1 inhibition (EC50 = 9.2) and toxicity (LD50 = 2.8) in PC12 cells. SOD1 promoter inhibition and cytotoxicity are shown as a percentage decrease relative to the DMSO treated control cells. (more ...)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pyrimethamine does not affect endogenous SOD1 levels in HeLa cells. (A) Western blot analysis of lysates from HeLa cells exposed to DMSO (0.25%) or pyrimethamine (25μM, 2.5μM or 0.25μM). Pyrimethamine does not alter levels of Actin (more ...)
We next examined the effect of pyrimethamine on endogenous SOD1 levels in WT mice. Pyrimethamine is widely reported to cross the blood brain barrier [23] [24], and it is routinely used to treat CNS toxoplasmosis. Moreover, the chemical structure adheres to quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) parameters [25] that are characteristic of compounds that are likely to show CNS penetrance. Mice were treated daily for 14 days with pyrimethamine at 10mg/kg/d by IP. SOD1 protein levels were the tested in brain, spinal cord and liver homogenates. No significant difference was observed in SOD1 levels in treated and untreated mice (Figure 3). T-test analysis gave p values of 0.55, 0.25 and 0.54 for brain, spinal cord and liver respectively. We therefore conclude that in these cell models and wild-type mice, pyrimethamine does not affect levels of SOD1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pyrimethamine does not affect SOD1 levels in mice. (A) As assessed by Western blotting, neither pyrimethamine (+) nor PBS control (−) treatment depresses levels of SOD1 or Actin. (B) Densitometry shows no significant difference in control (−) (more ...)
Effects on SOD1 promoter of drugs currently investigated in ALS
To test whether any drugs currently in clinical trials in human or murine ALS inhibit expression of SOD1 protein, we determined dose response curves for the test compounds using our PC12 model. 34 drugs in total were tested (Table 1), 17 were in clinical trials in ALS patients; the others are being investigated in the SOD1 ALS mouse model. 23 compounds had no effect on the SOD1 promoter (labeled no effect in Table 1). Eleven compounds were shown to inhibit fluorescence, but in each case the LD50 was lower than the EC50, indicating non-specific, cytotoxic activity (labeled toxic in Table 1). Three showed an inhibitory effect that was greater than the observed toxicity (labeled re-screened in Table 1). The effect of these three compounds (fluorouracil, progesterone and cyclosoporine) was marginal. The EC50/LD50 for these three compounds was 2.1μM/6.6μM for fluorouracil, 9.8μM/14.0μM for progesterone and 9.8μM/30.6μM for cyclosporine. In addition, when re-screened at single concentrations near the EC50 all three showed no significant difference between SOD1 inhibition and cytotoxicity (data not shown).
Table 1
Table 1
List of candidate ALS compounds analyzed using the PC12-SOD1 promoter cells assay. 34 compounds in animal (Table 1A) or clinical (Table 1B) studies were analyzed for their ability to inhibit the SOD1 promoter. Compounds that showed less than 30% inhibition (more ...)
Screening of the 1,040 US Drug collection Library
We next screened for potential inhibitors of the SOD1 promoter among 1,040, FDA approved, compounds in the US Drug Collection (MicroSource, USA). The PC12 SOD1-promoter cell line has previously been used to screen several compound libraries [12], testing compounds at a concentration of 1μM. In those earlier screens, no hits were identified. In the present study we used a 96 well plate format and tested each compound at 2.5μM. An average Z′ of 0.3 and an average Signal to background ratio of 3.2:1 was calculated for this assay. Nine compounds (dactinomycin, mitomycin C, cytarabine, daunorubicin, pyrithione zinc, phenylmercuric acetate, cycloheximide, doxorubicin and epirubicin hydrochloride) reduced the level of fluorescence by 30% or more and thus were designated hits. When re-screened and analyzed for cytotoxicity, all were cytotoxic; the reduction in SOD1 promoter activity being non-specific. These data demonstrate that none of the FDA-approved compounds currently available in the collection significantly reduce SOD1 promoter activity.
The goal of this study was to identify compounds that reduce levels of SOD1 protein without altering cellular viability; such compounds might be beneficial in mutant-SOD1-mediated ALS. We elected to examine pyrimethamine, several compounds currently being tested in trials in human and murine ALS and a set of 1,040 FDA approved compounds. Of these, only pyrimethamine has previously been reported to lower levels of SOD1 without any associated toxicity [19], [22]. In our PC12 SOD1-reporter assay, pyrimethamine reduced fluorescence but simultaneously induced cytotoxicity, findings that strongly suggest that the down-regulation of expression of the SOD1 gene is non-specific. To further pursue this result, we also tested the effect of pyrimethamine on endogenous SOD1 levels in HeLa cells and wild type mice and were again unable to discern any SOD1 protein reduction after treatment. We therefore cannot conclude that pyrimethamine attenuates SOD1 expression.
Additional screening of 34 drugs presently in human or mouse ALS trials, as well as a set of 1,040 FDA approved drugs, also failed to identify any inhibitors of SOD1 transcription. It should be noted that some of these drugs might act to reduce SOD1 levels via mechanisms of gene silencing other than promoter inhibition; which would not be detected in our assay, which directly assessed SOD1 promoter activity. Such examples include the amingoglycosides, erythromycin [26] and PTC 124, which influence post transcriptional events (e.g. modulating mRNA stability and efficiency during protein synthesis), and are candidate therapies for disorders like Duchenne muscular dystrophy and cystic fibrosis [27].
Silencing of the mutant SOD1 gene is an attractive target for future ALS therapies. Small molecules represent just one experimental paradigm. Approaches using RNAi techniques are being developed; siRNA has been shown to slow disease progression in mice [11] [28], as have lentiviral constructs [29]. Intrathecally delivered anti-sense oligonucleotides reduced SOD1 protein levels in rat spinal cord, and produce a corresponding increase in survival in transgenic ALS rats [30]. This particular therapy is now currently in trial in ALS patients. Activated Protein C (APC), an endogenous plasma protease which modulates gene expression by activation of several transcription factors, down-regulates SOD1 expression, leading to delayed progression and extended survival in ALS mice [31]. These studies establish the general principle that suppression of SOD1 expression can prolong survival in rodent SOD1 ALS models. For this reason, we are currently extending our studies using larger, more diverse small molecule libraries to identify novel lead compounds. In our view, it is likely that even minimal suppression of SOD1 levels will be beneficial in ALS mediated by mutant SOD1 protein and that small molecule-repressors of SOD1 will prove clinically efficient.
Figure 4
Figure 4
summarizes results of screening of the 1,040 compound US Drug Collection Library for inhibition of SOD1 promoter activity (fluorescence) as a percentage of decrease relative to DMSO cells. Compounds that showed a 30% inhibition of the SOD1 promoter were (more ...)
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Institute for Neurological Disease and Stroke, the Angel Fund, the ALS Association, Project ALS, Pierre L. de Bourgknecht ALS Research Foundation, the Al-Athel ALS Foundation and the ALS Therapy Alliance.
Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1. Miller RG, et al. Riluzole for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND) Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2003;4(3):191–206. [PubMed]
2. Vance C, et al. Mutations in FUS, an RNA processing protein, cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 6. Science. 2009;323(5918):1208–11. [PubMed]
3. Kwiatkowski TJ, Jr, et al. Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2009;323(5918):1205–8. [PubMed]
4. Sreedharan J, et al. TDP-43 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2008;319(5870):1668–72. [PubMed]
5. Greenway MJ, et al. A novel candidate region for ALS on chromosome 14q11.2. Neurology. 2004;63(10):1936–8. [PubMed]
6. Rosen DR. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 1993;364(6435):362. [PubMed]
8. Reaume AG, et al. Motor neurons in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase-deficient mice develop normally but exhibit enhanced cell death after axonal injury. Nat Genet. 1996;13(1):43–7. [PubMed]
9. Dal Canto MC, Gurney ME. Neuropathological changes in two lines of mice carrying a transgene for mutant human Cu, Zn SOD, and in mice overexpressing wild type human SOD: a model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FALS) Brain Res. 1995;676(1):25–40. [PubMed]
10. Nagai M, et al. Rats expressing human cytosolic copper-zinc superoxide dismutase transgenes with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: associated mutations develop motor neuron disease. J Neurosci. 2001;21(23):9246–54. [PubMed]
11. Ralph GS, et al. Silencing mutant SOD1 using RNAi protects against neurodegeneration and extends survival in an ALS model. Nat Med. 2005;11(4):429–33. [PubMed]
12. Broom WJ, et al. Two approaches to drug discovery in SOD1-mediated ALS. J Biomol Screen. 2006;11(7):729–35. [PubMed]
13. Gong YH, et al. Restricted expression of G86R Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase in astrocytes results in astrocytosis but does not cause motoneuron degeneration. J Neurosci. 2000;20(2):660–5. [PubMed]
14. Pramatarova A, et al. Neuron-specific expression of mutant superoxide dismutase 1 in transgenic mice does not lead to motor impairment. J Neurosci. 2001;21(10):3369–74. [PubMed]
15. Lino MM, Schneider C, Caroni P. Accumulation of SOD1 mutants in postnatal motoneurons does not cause motoneuron pathology or motoneuron disease. J Neurosci. 2002;22(12):4825–32. [PubMed]
16. Boillee S, et al. Onset and progression in inherited ALS determined by motor neurons and microglia. Science. 2006;312(5778):1389–92. [PubMed]
17. Yamanaka K, et al. Astrocytes as determinants of disease progression in inherited amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(3):251–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Yamamoto A, Lucas JJ, Hen R. Reversal of neuropathology and motor dysfunction in a conditional model of Huntington’s disease. Cell. 2000;101(1):57–66. [PubMed]
19. Lange D. Abstract C46: Pyrimethamine as a therapy for SOD1 associated FALS: Early findings. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2008;9(Suppl 1):45–47.
20. Ferone R, Burchall JJ, Hitchings GH. Plasmodium berghei dihydrofolate reductase. Isolation, properties, and inhibition by antifolates. Mol Pharmacol. 1969;5(1):49–59. [PubMed]
21. Pierdominici M, et al. Pyrimethamine (2,4-diamino-5-p-chlorophenyl-6-ethylpyrimidine) induces apoptosis of freshly isolated human T lymphocytes, bypassing CD95/Fas molecule but involving its intrinsic pathway. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;315(3):1046–57. [PubMed]
22. USPA. 20060211645. 2006.
23. Weiss LM, et al. Pyrimethamine concentrations in serum and cerebrospinal fluid during treatment of acute Toxoplasma encephalitis in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1988;157(3):580–3. [PubMed]
24. Cavallito JC, et al. Lipid-soluble inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase. I. Kinetics, tissue distribution, and extent of metabolism of pyrimethamine, metoprine, and etoprine in the rat, dog, and man. Drug Metab Dispos. 1978;6(3):329–37. [PubMed]
25. Pajouhesh H, Lenz GR. Medicinal chemical properties of successful central nervous system drugs. NeuroRx. 2005;2(4):541–53. [PubMed]
26. Bechhofer DH. Triple post-transcriptional control. Mol Microbiol. 1990;4(9):1419–23. [PubMed]
27. Welch EM, et al. PTC124 targets genetic disorders caused by nonsense mutations. Nature. 2007;447(7140):87–91. [PubMed]
28. Wang H, et al. Therapeutic gene silencing delivered by a chemically modified small interfering RNA against mutant SOD1 slows amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(23):15845–52. [PubMed]
29. Raoul C, et al. Lentiviral-mediated silencing of SOD1 through RNA interference retards disease onset and progression in a mouse model of ALS. Nat Med. 2005;11(4):423–8. [PubMed]
30. Smith RA, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide therapy for neurodegenerative disease. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(8):2290–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Zhong Z, et al. Activated protein C therapy slows ALS-like disease in mice by transcriptionally inhibiting SOD1 in motor neurons and microglia cells. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(11):3437–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]