Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosgenPLoS GeneticsSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Genet. 2010 October; 6(10): e1001169.
Published online 2010 October 21. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.1001169
PMCID: PMC2958818

Ancient and Recent Adaptive Evolution of Primate Non-Homologous End Joining Genes

Mikkel H. Schierup, Editor


In human cells, DNA double-strand breaks are repaired primarily by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. Given their critical nature, we expected NHEJ proteins to be evolutionarily conserved, with relatively little sequence change over time. Here, we report that while critical domains of these proteins are conserved as expected, the sequence of NHEJ proteins has also been shaped by recurrent positive selection, leading to rapid sequence evolution in other protein domains. In order to characterize the molecular evolution of the human NHEJ pathway, we generated large simian primate sequence datasets for NHEJ genes. Codon-based models of gene evolution yielded statistical support for the recurrent positive selection of five NHEJ genes during primate evolution: XRCC4, NBS1, Artemis, POLλ, and CtIP. Analysis of human polymorphism data using the composite of multiple signals (CMS) test revealed that XRCC4 has also been subjected to positive selection in modern humans. Crystal structures are available for XRCC4, Nbs1, and Polλ; and residues under positive selection fall exclusively on the surfaces of these proteins. Despite the positive selection of such residues, biochemical experiments with variants of one positively selected site in Nbs1 confirm that functions necessary for DNA repair and checkpoint signaling have been conserved. However, many viruses interact with the proteins of the NHEJ pathway as part of their infectious lifecycle. We propose that an ongoing evolutionary arms race between viruses and NHEJ genes may be driving the surprisingly rapid evolution of these critical genes.

Author Summary

Because all cells experience DNA damage, they must also have mechanisms for repairing DNA. When the proteins that repair DNA malfunction, mutation and disease often result. Based on their fundamental importance, DNA repair proteins would be expected to be well preserved over evolutionary time in order to ensure optimal DNA repair function. However, a previous genome-wide study of molecular evolution in Saccharomyces yeast identified the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) DNA repair pathway as one of the two most rapidly evolving pathways in the yeast genome. In order to analyze the evolution of this pathway in humans, we have generated large evolutionary sequence sets of NHEJ genes from our primate relatives. Similar to the scenario in yeast, several genes in this pathway are evolving rapidly in primate genomes and in modern human populations. Thus, complex and seemingly opposite selective forces are shaping the evolution of these important DNA repair genes. The finding that NHEJ genes are rapidly evolving in species groups as diverse as yeasts and primates indicates a systematic perturbation of the NHEJ pathway, one that is potentially important to human health.


DNA double-strand breaks are a particularly toxic form of DNA lesion. Such breaks are repaired through several pathways, the most well-studied being homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ; reviewed in [1]). NHEJ is also required for V(D)J recombination, which generates immunoglobulin and T cell receptor diversity. Accordingly, mutations in NHEJ genes have been linked to both cancer and immune deficiencies. Given the central importance of these processes, NHEJ genes are expected to have a low tolerance for mutations. Such a hypothesis would be supported if sequences of NHEJ genes are stable and relatively unchanging over evolutionary time.

In contrast to this expectation, a genome-wide analysis uncovered NHEJ as one of the two functional pathways most enriched for positive selection during Saccharomyces evolution [2]. Positive selection occurs when natural selection operates on an advantageous mutation, driving an increase in its prevalence over time, and sometimes leading to fixation of this mutation in the species in which it arose. Because advantageous mutations commonly involve a change in protein sequence, recurrent rounds of positive selection can lead to relatively rapid protein sequence evolution over time. Positive selection has been found to predominantly affect genes in three functional classes: reproduction, immunity, and environmental perception (smell, taste, etc), presumably because these processes are under strong selection for constant adaptive change [3][10]. The intriguing observation of positive selection in the NHEJ genes of Saccharomyces remains unexplained, but could potentially be attributed to the fact that NHEJ is not the major pathway for the repair of double-strand breaks in yeast [11]. Relaxation of evolutionary constraints on NHEJ genes in yeast species, due to their reliance predominantly on the homologous recombination pathway, could have made NHEJ genes vulnerable to competing evolutionary forces. In this study, we have analyzed the molecular evolution of NHEJ genes in primates, including humans, where NHEJ is the major pathway for DNA double-strand break repair.

NHEJ is activated upon detection of DNA double-strand breaks. After detection, NHEJ proteins enzymatically process broken DNA ends to allow for efficient end joining. Repair is then completed through the action of repair-specific DNA polymerases and the NHEJ ligation complex, which fill in and seal the break [1]. To analyze the selective pressures that have shaped the genes of the human NHEJ pathway, we generated sequence datasets of primate orthologs from twenty simian primate species. We find support for positive selection in five NHEJ genes: NBS1, CtIP, Artemis, XRCC4 and POLλ. Analysis of human polymorphism data indicates that positive selection has also operated on XRCC4 in modern humans. Crystal structures are available for the Nbs1, XRCC4, and Polλ proteins, and in all cases we find that amino acid sites targeted by positive selection fall on protein surfaces. It is well-established that rapidly evolving amino acid residues tend to be found on the surfaces of proteins [12][14]. In previous studies where the significance of these residues has been structurally or functionally investigated, it has been shown that they modulate protein-protein, protein-ligand, or protein-DNA interactions [15][24]. However, we demonstrate biochemically that positive selection in Nbs1 at one of the three residues identified has not affected its physical interactions with other DNA repair components. In the discussion, we propose that the positive selection of NHEJ genes may be explained by the diverse viruses and genetic parasites that interact with these proteins to promote their own lifecycle.


Sliding window analysis of selective pressures shaping NHEJ genes

We utilized primate sequence datasets to study the evolutionary history of human NHEJ genes. With human population genetic data, evolutionary pressures can usually only be summarized for chromosomal regions larger than a single gene. However, with inter-species divergence data, resolution of evolutionary signatures can be increased to the level of a single gene, and it is sometimes possible to see the serial fixation of mutations in particular gene regions or even codons. The limitation in these studies is the number of available primate sequences. We first performed a preliminary survey of the selective pressures that have shaped all of the major genes of the NHEJ pathway (Figure 1A), so that we could generate appropriate primate datasets for candidate genes containing signatures suggestive of positive selection.

Figure 1
Sliding window analysis identifies five candidate NHEJ genes evolving under positive selection.

Five nearly complete primate genome projects are publicly available: human, chimpanzee, orangutan, rhesus macaque, and marmoset. Ten possible pairwise gene comparisons can be made between these five species, but three pairwise comparisons (human-orangutan, human-rhesus, and rhesus-marmoset) were chosen that maximize divergence and minimize phylogenetic re-sampling (Figure 1B). For each NHEJ gene, these three pairwise gene alignments were constructed and analyzed with a custom algorithm that calculates dN/dS in sliding windows along the length of each gene [25]. The dN/dS ratio captures the ratio of non-synonymous (dN; changing the encoded amino acid) to synonymous (dS; silent) DNA mutations that have accumulated since two genes last shared a common ancestor [26]. For most protein-encoding genes, the observed number of non-synonymous mutations is far less than the number of synonymous mutations observed (dN/dS<1) [5]. This is because mutations which cause an alteration in amino acid sequence are more likely to be detrimental to proper protein folding and function, and are therefore typically selected against (purifying selection). As expected in a typical gene, dN is less than dS (dN/dS<1) for all windows along the length of the NHEJ gene KU70 (Figure 1C).

Under positive selection, non-synonymous mutations are swept through populations more quickly than neutral or nearly-neutral synonymous mutations due to a selectable advantage that they convey. After many such rounds, such a regime gives rise to the dN>dS signature that is indicative of positive selection (dN/dS>1). Sliding window analysis of dN/dS is useful when making pairwise gene comparisons, as positive selection may be limited to specific regions that are buried within a gene that is otherwise conserved. In the case of XRCC4, sliding window analyses of human-rhesus and rhesus-marmoset pairwise alignments highlight the 3′ end of the gene as having signatures of dN/dS>1 (p<0.001 and p<0.005, respectively; Figure 1C). In this region, human and rhesus XRCC4 sequences differ by nine non-synonymous DNA mutations and zero synonymous mutations. In the human–orangutan comparison, a different region in the 5′ end of the gene shows a significant inflation of dN/dS above 1 (p<0.05). The different location of this signal may indicate a unique selective force that is operating specifically in the great apes.

Sliding window analyses have an inherent multiple testing problem that is difficult to correct because of the non-independence of tests (windows overlap) [27]. Nevertheless, we have successfully utilized sliding window analysis as a pre-screening tool in several previous studies [2], [28]. As an ad hoc method for eliminating some false positive signatures, we sought genes with regions of dN/dS significantly>1 in at least two out of three different pairwise primate comparisons made. All pairwise comparisons for each NHEJ gene are shown in Figure S1, and the maximum dN/dS value found in each comparison is summarized in Figure 1D. We find that five out of thirteen NHEJ genes bear significant regions of dN/dS>1 in at least two out of the three primate comparisons made (highlighted in gray in Figure 1D). Thus, we have identified preliminary signals of positive selection in five candidate NHEJ genes: NBS1, Artemis, CtIP, POLλ, and XRCC4.

Analysis of extended primate datasets for candidate genes

In order to verify positive selection with greater statistical rigor, larger sequence datasets are required. We sequenced all five candidate genes from 15 additional hominoid, old world monkey, and new world monkey species. Despite the fact that no significant windows of dN/dS>1 were observed in any of the pairwise comparisons of XLF (Figure 1D), we also included this gene because positive selection was previously reported in an analysis of mammalian XLF sequences [29]. In total, 90 primate genes were sequenced (6 genes, each from 15 species). We also re-sequenced all genes that were incomplete in the available primate genome projects (chimpanzee, orangutan, rhesus macaque, or marmoset). Details of primate cell lines, cell culture, mRNA extraction, cDNA library construction, and divergent-species PCR are given in the materials and methods section and in Tables S1, S2, S3. The resulting dataset for each gene is comprised of orthologs from 20 primate species that represent approximately 35 million years of primate evolution [30].

The multiple sequence alignment generated for each gene was analyzed for positive selection with the “codeml” program in PAML [31]. The codeml program provides a maximum likelihood framework for estimating dN/dS rates over the entire history of primate evolution by integrating over all ancestral gene sequences in the context of a phylogeny [32], [33]. This program offers several models for gene evolution, some where no codons are allowed to evolve with dN/dS>1 (NSsites models M1a, M7 and M8a), and others where positive selection of some codons is allowed (NSsites models M2a and M8). A likelihood ratio test allows comparison of positive selection models to null models. Results of all model comparisons for each gene are provided in Tables S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, and the results of the M8a vs. M8 comparisons, using the f61 model of codon usage, are summarized in Table 1. The null model (M8a) is rejected (p<0.05) in favor of the model of positive selection (M8) in four of these six genes: CtIP, Artemis, XRCC4, and POLλ. For NBS1, the null model was very nearly rejected (p = 0.056). This analysis did not support a model of positive selection in primate XLF (p = 0.59). As mentioned above, sliding window analysis did not detect domains of positive selection in XLF. In conclusion, we find strong support for positive selection in four genes of the primate NHEJ pathway, a surprising finding given the critical role that these proteins play in DNA repair.

Table 1
PAML analysis of primate NHEJ genes.

Analysis of the 20-species NBS1 dataset yielded marginal support for positive selection (p = 0.056; Table 1). However, we noticed that several amino acid positions in the NBS1 protein alignment had changed multiple times exclusively in hominoid species (humans, great apes, and gibbons). Based on this, we considered that positive selection of NBS1 may be specific to hominoids. Indeed, analysis of NBS1 from only the hominoid species resulted in improved statistical support for positive selection (p = 0.048; Table 1), despite the fact that the analysis of only eight sequences should greatly reduce statistical power. To formally test the hypothesis of hominoid-specific positive selection, we analyzed our datasets with “branch-site” models of evolution [34]. This test allowed us to determine whether there are codon positions evolving under positive selection specifically in the hominoid clade. NBS1 was the only one of the six NHEJ genes for which this hypothesis was supported (p<0.005; Table S10), and support is robust under all models of codon usage (Table S11). Because three total tests were performed on the NBS1 dataset, a Bonferroni-corrected p-value can be calculated for the rejection of the null hypothesis in the branch-sites test (p<0.015). Thus, hominoid-specific positive selection is supported in NBS1. Interestingly, the yeast ortholog of NBS1 (XRS2) was also identified as being under positive selection during Saccharomyces evolution [2].

Specific codon sites that have been the target of recurrent positive selection could be identified in the dataset for each NHEJ gene (Table 1). Posterior probabilities of codons included in the dN/dS>1 site class are commonly considered highly significant at cutoffs as low as P = 0.90, and potentially even lower [35]. The positions of these amino acid sites are summarized in Figure 2. Crystal structures have been solved for Polλ, XRCC4, and Nbs1, allowing us to further analyze the patterns of positive selection in these three proteins.

Figure 2
Five proteins in the NHEJ pathway show signatures of positive selection.

Positive selection of POLλ

Polλ is one of two DNA polymerases involved in the filling of gaps formed during NHEJ [36]. Approximately 5% of the codons in this gene were identified as evolving under positive selection, with an average dN/dS value of 3.2 (Table 1). Eight specific codons could be assigned to this class with high posterior probability (P>0.90), and these sites are scattered across the linear protein sequence (Figure 2). The crystal structure of the 39 kDa Polλ catalytic domain has been solved in complex with substrate DNA, and this catalytic core is comprised of the fingers, palm, thumb, and 8 kDa subdomains (Figure 3) [37]. Four of the eight amino acid sites identified as being positively selected are part of this catalytic core domain. All four (E330, S381, R441, and R484) map to the outer surface of the three-dimensional structure (red balls in Figure 3), with none of the sites being found within the enzyme active site. Thus, residues under recurrent positive selection fall on the protein surface, and mutations at these sites are not predicted to directly affect catalytic activity.

Figure 3
Residues under positive selection in Polλ fall on the protein surface.

Positive selection of XRCC4 during primate evolution

The NHEJ-specific ligase complex is composed of DNA ligase IV (Lig4) along with the regulatory molecules XLF and XRCC4 [1]. The dN/dS>1 site class in XRCC4 is assigned a value of dN/dS = 15, nearly double the value seen for any other NHEJ gene (Table 1). Given the extreme value, only one codon, L243, can be supported as a member of this class with high posterior probability (P>0.99). To uncover more codons that may be evolving under positive selection, a secondary analysis was performed on the three XRCC4 structural domains: the N-terminal head domain, which is involved in DNA binding, the coiled-coil stalk domain, which includes the ligase binding domain, and the unstructured C-terminal domain (residues 204–336). Positive selection is supported only in the C-terminal domain (p<0.001; Table 1). Because four tests were performed on the XRCC4 dataset, the Bonferroni-corrected p-value for the observation of positive selection in the C-terminal domain is p<0.004. In this domain, six codon sites, including L243 identified previously, were identified as evolving under positive selection (P>0.90), with support for five of these being P>0.95. These codons were now collectively assigned a dN/dS value of 8.7. All of these codons were also identified, albeit with lower confidence, in the full-length XRCC4 analysis (Table S7).

The partial crystal structure of the XRCC4 dimer in complex with its binding partner, Lig4, has been solved [38]. All six of the identified codons map just downstream of the Lig4-binding domain (red dots in Figure 4A), in a region of the protein where the structure is predicted to transition from an alpha-helix to an unstructured domain. This unstructured domain is not included in the crystal structure, but has been represented in schematic form for illustration. Strikingly, of the five sites supported at the 95% confidence level, the first four (R205, Q211, A216, and C218) lie within a 14 amino acid stretch of the protein (4% of the length of the protein), and the fifth site (L243) lies just 25 residues downstream of this cluster. We assessed the significance of this clustering on the linear protein sequence by determining how many times a random sampling of five sites fell in a cluster equal to or smaller than the 39 amino acid region that contains the sites under positive selection. Comparing this observed distance to a null distribution (100,000 permutations) lends statistical support to the hypothesis that these positively selected sites are clustered (p = 0.0005). The functional significance of this “patch” of positive selection is unknown. A protein alignment of primate XRCC4 in this region is shown in Figure 4B. To the left, a cladogram shows the relationship of the twenty primate species used in this study. Amino acid positions evolving under positive selection are shown in the alignment in gray. This unstructured C-terminal domain has been shown to be dispensable for repair and V(D)J recombination [39], [40]. However, this domain also contains a number of regulatory sites including a SUMOylation site and several DNA-PKcs phosphorylation sites [41], [42], as well as a known cancer-linked mutation [43] (Figure 4B).

Figure 4
XRCC4, a component of the NHEJ ligase complex, shows a clustered signature of positive selection.

Positive selection of XRCC4 in modern humans

We investigated whether the NHEJ genes that have been subject to ancient recurrent positive selection in simian primates are also under recent local adaptation in humans. We examined the five genes POLλ, XRCC4, Artemis, NBS1, and CtIP for signals of selection in the HapMap Phase II [44] data using a recently published method, the Composite of Multiple Signals (CMS) [45]. By combining multiple tests, CMS increases resolution for localizing signals of selection by up to 100-fold, and has a lower false-positive rate than the component individual tests. We examined SNPs within and surrounding each gene of interest, with a window size of 100kb upstream and 100kb downstream of each gene (see Materials and Methods). In the European population, the CMS signal for XRCC4 is significant at a threshold that yields a 0.1% false positive rate in simulations, and is one of the top 60 strongest signals in the genome (Table S12). Applying CMS to fine-map the region, we localized the signal to 83kb entirely within the gene, suggesting that XRCC4 is a target of recent local adaptation (Figure 5). In the other four genes, we did not observe any signals significant at the same level as XRCC4, but we do observe suggestive signals by the individual tests (in the top 1–5% tail genome-wide) in POLλ and XRCC4 in the West African population, and Artemis in the European population (Table S12). As CMS is optimized to detect recent local adaptation in a single population, these signals by individual tests may reflect selective events outside of this model (e.g., selection on standing variation, or selection of the same allele in multiple populations). Indeed, a single allele of POLλ has previously been reported to be under positive selection in both Asian and Sub-Sahara African populations [46]. Thus we find that several of the genes that have been evolving under positive selection during primate evolution also show evidence suggestive of recent positive selection in human populations, with an especially strong signature identified in XRCC4.

Figure 5
XRCC4 is under positive selection in modern humans.

Essential repair-related interactions are conserved despite positive selection of Nbs1

Nbs1 is part of the MRN complex, containing Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1. This complex is involved in DNA break detection, end processing, and cellular signaling [47]. Mutations in NBS1 lead to the autosomal recessive disease, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, which is characterized by chromosomal instability. Three amino acid positions were identified as evolving under positive selection (Table 1). G9, Q185, and I531 are identified with P>0.90, with support for I531 being P>0.99. A partial Nbs1 structure is available [48], and two of the amino acid sites targeted by positive selection (residues 9 and 185) fall on the protein surface (Figure 6A). The third site, residue 531, is not included in this partial structure.

Figure 6
Interactions with other repair proteins have been conserved in Nbs1 despite its positive selection.

The positive selection of NHEJ genes suggests that certain mutations are providing a fitness advantage in an unknown context. While the essential DNA repair functions of these genes would be expected to remain conserved, there is a formal possibility that adaptive evolution of NHEJ genes could come at the cost of DNA repair. We wished to consider this hypothesis because a human SNP at a site of positive selection in NBS1 (Q185E; SNP ID rs1805794) has been linked to increased risk of renal, skin, and lung cancer in multiple association studies [49][52]. This SNP is found at high frequencies in human populations (Figure 6B). While Q185E has been linked to cancer, association studies are limited in that they may identify either a causal SNP, or a SNP that is linked to a causal SNP. We wished to test whether amino acid substitution in this codon changes the performance of Nbs1 in DNA repair, as the association with cancer might suggest.

We constructed NBS1 alleles encoding either an E or a Q at position 185, and expressed these proteins in insect cells using a baculovirus system. We then tested the effects of this mutation on several of the known activities of Nbs1. The Nbs1 N-terminus, including the BRCT domain in which this SNP is located, is known to bind to the checkpoint protein Mdc1 [53][56]. We produced and purified MRN complexes containing both versions of Nbs1 and find that both interact equally well with purified Mdc1 in an in vitro binding assay (Figure 6C). Thus the Nbs1 E/Q polymorphism is not expected to affect the association of MRN with Mdc1 at sites of DNA damage in vivo. The MRN complex is also required for the activation of the checkpoint protein ATM [57], [58]. We find that MRN complexes containing both versions of Nbs1 are equally efficient in stimulating ATM-dependent phosphorylation of one of the downstream targets of ATM, p53 (Figure 6D). Nbs1 is also known to bind XRCC4/Lig4 [59] and we find that both versions of Nbs1 interact equally well with this complex in vitro (data not shown). Therefore, we conclude that positive selection of this codon, regardless of what is driving it, has not affected the repair-related physical interactions of Nbs1. However, it should be noted that laboratory-based assays may not be sensitive enough to detect subtle defects that could cause a minor fitness effect in nature.


The NHEJ pathway is over 3 billion years old, and is found in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. Despite the ancient conservation of the pathway, we have identified five NHEJ genes that have evolved under positive selection during the evolution of simian primates: NBS1, CtIP, Artemis, XRCC4, and POLλ. An analysis of polymorphism data supports positive selection of XRCC4 in modern humans as well. Interestingly, the yeast ortholog of NBS1 (XRS2) was also identified as one of the two Saccharomyces NHEJ genes with the most extreme signatures of positive selection [2]. One hypothesis is that these signatures of positive selection are reflective of natural selection for more efficient DNA repair. As certain NHEJ components evolve, compensatory mutations may arise in other NHEJ components to re-optimize protein-protein interactions between the various components. We feel that this model is unlikely. In the absence of an antagonizing force, there is no reason that recurrent adaptive change should be required of any member of this pathway, which would then need to be followed by compensatory change. Four observations from our study additionally argue against this model. First, our biochemical experiments with Nbs1 suggest that positive selection of at least one of the three sites identified has not altered interactions with other repair proteins. Second, although there are several core complexes involved in NHEJ (the MRN complex and the Lig4/XRCC4/XLF complex), only one component of each of these was identified as evolving under positive selection. Third, the clustered sites of positive selection in XRCC4 fall within the C-terminal protein domain that is not essential for DNA repair. Fourth, the positive selection of the NHEJ pathway is not a primate specific phenomenon, but is also found in Saccharomyces yeast [2], arguing against a model where some novel role for DNA repair during primate evolution has driven this selection.

The finding of multiple primate NHEJ components evolving under positive selection, supported by parallel findings in Saccharomyces yeast, indicates a systematic perturbation of the NHEJ pathway. With positive selection observed in two highly divergent eukaryotic clades, a model for the cause of this rapid evolution must span such diverse species groups. We propose that NHEJ genes may be antagonized by genetic parasites, which in primates are comprised of viruses and retrotransposons.

Proteins of the NHEJ repair pathway have been shown to act as antiviral factors in the lifecycle of human adenovirus, a linear double-stranded DNA virus. Adenoviruses are a major cause of upper respiratory and other infections in humans. During infection, components of the NHEJ pathway join together viral genome ends, causing “dead-end” viral genome concatenation [60]. To counteract this antiviral tactic, adenovirus proteins (encoded by the E4 genes) sequester and target for degradation a number of components of the NHEJ pathway, including components of the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 and Lig4/XRCC4/XLF complexes [60][63]. CtIP has also been implicated in the adenovirus lifecycle through its interaction with the adenovirus early region 1A (AdE1A) protein [64]. If primate NHEJ genes are continually selected to encode variants that can evade interaction with these adenoviral antagonists, while the viral antagonists continually counter-evolve, this could drive positive selection of primate NHEJ genes. Adenovirus has been found in stool samples from great apes and macaques [65], indicating a possible long-standing co-evolution between this virus and primates.

Retroviruses like HIV may also provide the selective pressure that shapes the recurrent positive selection of NHEJ genes. There is abundant genetic evidence suggesting a role for NHEJ in the retroviral lifecycle [66][70]. Upon cellular entry, the retroviral RNA genome is reverse transcribed into double-stranded DNA. The ultimate destination for this retroviral cDNA is integration into the genome of the host, but it must first survive passage through the nucleus without being detected as broken DNA by the cell. NHEJ proteins have been found to physically associate with retroviral proteins, cDNA, and pre-integration complexes in vivo and in two-hybrid interactions [67], [71][74]. There are several models which have been proposed to explain this. In one model, NHEJ proteins are recruited by the viral complex to protect free viral cDNA ends from degradation or from triggering apoptosis. In another model, the viral complex recruits host NHEJ proteins to promote the repair of breaks created at sites of retroviral cDNA integration into the host genome. In a third model, NHEJ proteins act as antivirals, joining the two long-terminal repeat (LTR) ends of the viral cDNA into dead-end “2-LTR circles.” These 2-LTR circles are ubiquitously observed in the nuclei of infected cells [67]. Regardless of the model, allelic variants of NHEJ genes that result in lower infection rates would be selectively advantageous to the host. Should such alleles go to high frequency or fixation, retroviruses would be expected to counter-evolve, and the back-and-forth interplay would drive recurrent positive selection of NHEJ genes. Retroviruses and primates have co-evolved for tens of millions of years, as illustrated by the fact that all sequenced primate genomes contain the remnants of hundreds of thousands of integrated retroviruses [75].

It is unknown whether the positive selection observed in NHEJ genes represents a response to a single selective force, or whether multiple forces are shaping their evolution. At least eight additional viral families have been shown to evade or exploit the host DNA damage response [76]. Several NHEJ proteins include one or more “BRCT” domains, which have been linked to viral infection in multiple instances. The Epstein-Barr viral protein Zta has been shown to interact with the BRCT domains of 53BP1, a component of the DNA damage response, to prevent apoptosis that is activated in response to viral replication [77]. HIV-1 Tat has also been shown to interact with the BRCT domain of the human replication protein FCP1 [78]. In both Polλ and Nbs1, we find an amino acid position at the C-terminal end of the BRCT domain to be evolving under positive selection (Q185 in Nbs1 and Q102 in Polλ). The single site found to be under positive selection in Saccharomyces Xrs2 also falls near the end of the BRCT domain (site 298) [2]. BRCT domains could be a critical link in the interaction between viruses and the NHEJ pathway. Antagonism of host NHEJ proteins by genetic parasites may be a universal feature of cellular life, as yeast Ty retrotransposons also interact genetically and physically with NHEJ machinery [79], [80]. LINE-1 retrotransposons are major drivers of primate genome evolution, and LINE-1 retrotransposition rates are reduced in the absence of NHEJ genes [81]. The Corndog and Omega bacteriophages of mycobacteria have even incorporated the first gene in the bacterial NHEJ pathway, Ku, into their own genome [82]. This viral Ku now evolves under the selective pressures of the virus in order to recruit the bacterial NHEJ ligase, LigD, to circularize phage DNA.

In summary, we have documented abundant signatures of positive selection in genes of the NHEJ pathway, which is the major pathway for repairing double-strand chromosomal breaks in mammalian cells. We propose the hypothesis that these signatures result from the long-term co-evolution between NHEJ genes and genetic parasites. While it is well known that genetic parasites shape genome architecture through insertion and subsequent inter-element recombination, the present study may indicate that selective pressures imposed by genetic parasites can drive the evolution of protein sequence in critical human proteins.

Materials and Methods

Primate NHEJ gene sequences

Chimpanzee, orangutan, rhesus macaque, and marmoset gene sequences were obtained from the UCSC genome database ( using the BLAT alignment tool [83]. NBS1, CtIP, Artemis, XRCC4, POLλ, and XLF were sequenced from 15 additional primate species, and poor-quality regions of chimpanzee, orangutan, rhesus and marmoset genes were also re-sequenced. Primary and immortalized primate cell lines (sources and individual primate identifiers are listed in Table S1) were grown in standard media supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum at 37°C and in 5% CO2. Total RNA was harvested from cell lines using the AllPrep DNA/RNA kit (Qiagen). PCR was performed from total RNA and/or cDNA with OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) or PCR SuperMix High Fidelity (Invitrogen), respectively. Details of the PCR and sequencing strategy, along with primer sequences, can be found in Tables S2 and S3. Primate NHEJ gene sequences have been deposited in GenBank (accession numbers HM486750–HM486849).

Sliding window analysis

Alignments between orthologous gene pairs were performed using ClustalX2.0 [84]. Sliding-window dN/dS calculations for each alignment were performed with the SLIDERKK program [25]. Human-orangutan, human-rhesus and rhesus-marmoset alignments were analyzed with standard window sizes of 450bp, 306bp and 153bp, respectively, to reflect the increasing level of divergence in these species pairs (window size must be a multiple of nine in this program) [2], [28]. In order to generate confidence values for windows with dN/dS>1, the K-estimator program [85] was utilized to generate a null distribution through Monte Carlo simulation of randomly derived dN/dS values in the gene region of interest.

PAML analysis

Multiple alignments were created with ClustalX2.0 [84]. Maximum likelihood analysis was performed with codeml in the PAML 4.1 software package [31]. To detect selection, multiple alignments were fitted to the NSsites models M1a (neutral model, codon values of dN/dS are fit into two site classes, one with value between 0 and 1, and one fixed at dN/dS = 1), M2a (positive selection model, similar to M1a but with an extra class of dN/dS>1 allowed), M7 (neutral model, codon values of dN/dS fit to a beta distribution, dN/dS>1 disallowed), M8a (neutral model, similar to M7 except with a fixed codon class of at dN/dS = 1) and M8 (positive selection model, similar to M7 but with an extra class of dN/dS>1 allowed). Simulations were run with multiple seed values for dN/dS (ω) and assuming either the f61 or f3x4 model of codon frequencies. Likelihood ratio tests were performed to assess whether permitting codons to evolve under positive selection gives a significantly better fit to the data (model comparisons M1a vs. M2a, M7 vs. M8, M8a vs. M8). In situations where the null model could be rejected (p<0.05), posterior probabilities were assigned to individual codons belonging to the class of codons with dN/dS>1. Residues under positive selection were mapped onto existing crystal structures using MacPyMol (v.0.99;

The branch-site test allows identification of positive selection that might be limited to a subset of codons along only a subset of the branches being analyzed [34]. To implement this test, multiple alignments were fitted to the branch-sites Model A (positive selection model, codon values of dN/dS along background branches are fit into two site classes, one (ω0) between 0 and 1 and one (ω1) equal to 1, on the foreground branches a third site class is allowed (ω2) with dN/dS>1), and Model A with fixed ω2 = 1 (null model, similar to Model A except the foreground ω2 value is fixed at 1). Hominoids were defined as the “foreground” clade, with all other branches in the tree being defined as background branches. The likelihood of Model A is compared to the likelihood of the null model with a likelihood ratio test. Simulations were run with multiple seed values for dN/dS and assuming either the f61 or f3x4 models of codon frequencies. The “Fequal” codon model was also tested in the branch-site analysis of NBS1.

Clustering analysis

To test the significance of clustering of the codons under positive selection in XRCC4, the statistical program R was utilized to perform a permutation test. The observed span of the positively selected codons on the primary sequence was compared with a null distribution created by calculating the span resulting from randomly generated sets of equivalent numbers of codons. We generated 100,000 random distances.

Population genetic tests

To examine evidence for recent positive selection in humans, we implemented a previously published method that combines multiple tests for selection, the Composite of Multiple Signals (CMS) [45]. We have adapted the method to detect genomic regions under selection by examining the fraction of high scores in 100kb sliding windows. To determine the significance threshold, we used the cosi coalescent simulator to simulate 1,000 1MB autosomal regions, evolving neutrally under a previously validated demographic model [86]. We set thresholds that yielded a 0.1% false positive rate in simulations. Two long-haplotype tests, XP-EHH and iHS, were used to examine evidence for selection in or around the genes of interest. iHS was calculated as described in [10] for all SNPs with a minor allele frequency greater than 5%. iHS was analyzed independently in the European (CEU), East Asian (JPT and CHB), and West African (Yoruban; YRI) populations. XP-EHH was calculated as in [9] for the each of the three populations. For each SNP, we found the maximum score of the comparisons with the two other populations. In each 100kb window along the gene regions, the fraction of SNPs with |iHS|>2 or the maximum XP-EHH score was used as the test statistic. To calculate empirical P-values for each window w, we calculated the test statistics for each 100kb window across the genome and found the fraction of genomic windows with values of the test statistic greater than that found for window w. The ancestral state for each SNP was determined by comparison to the chimpanzee genome. We calculated Fst for each SNP in the regions using the Weir-Cockerham estimator [87]. Three pairwise comparisons were made between the African (Yoruban), European, and East Asian populations. For each population, we compared the allele frequency in that population to the average frequency in the other two populations. For each 100kb window across the region, the maximum Fst was used as the test statistic. To generate the null distribution, we performed the same procedure on each 100kb window in the genome and derived an empirical p-value based on this distribution.

Plasmid constructs and expression

A biotinylated human MRN (E185) complex was expressed in a baculovirus system from the transfer vectors pTP11 (Rad50), pTP814 (Mre11), pTP1014 (Nbs1), and pTP1016 (BirA) as described earlier [88]. To make biotinylated human MRN (Q185) complex, the E to Q point mutation at Nbs1 position 185 was introduced into pTP994, whose bacmid form is pTP1014, by primer-based mutagenesis (QuikChange Kit, Invitrogen). Flag-tagged Mdc1 (amino acids 1–740) was expressed using bacmid construct pTP1188, which was made from the corresponding transfer vector pTP1187. Expression constructs for Flag-tagged and HA-tagged ATM were gifts from M. Kastan and R. Abraham. The E. coli expression construct for GST-p53 was described earlier [89].

Protein purification

Purification procedures for the biotinylated MRN complex were the same as for the non-biotinylated MRN complex as described earlier [90]. Dimeric ATM was made by transient transfection of expression constructs into 293T cells using calcium phosphate and purified as described earlier [91]. Mdc1 (aa 1–740) was expressed in Sf21 insect cells using the Bac-to-Bac system (Invitrogen) and was purified identically to 53BP1 as described earlier [88]. The GST-p53 was purified identically to the GST–Brca1 fragments as described earlier [92] and was further purified by separation on a Superdex 200 gel filtration column (GE) in buffer A (100 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris pH8, 10% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT). Protein concentrations were determined by quantification of protein preparations with standards on colloidal Coomassie-stained SDS–PAGE gels using the Odyssey system (LiCor).

In vitro binding assay

20 nM biotinylated MRN complex was incubated with 45 nM Mdc1 (aa 1–740) in buffer A for 1 hour at 30°C in a final volume of 100 µl, then incubated with streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Dynal) and 0.2% CHAPS (Sigma) while rotating at 4°C for 15 min. Beads with associated proteins were washed three times with buffer A containing 0.2% CHAPS, and bound proteins were eluted by boiling the beads in SDS loading buffer. Proteins were analyzed by SDS–PAGE and western blotting using antibodies directed against the Flag epitope (Sigma, F3165) and Nbs1 (Genetex, MSNBS10PX1).

Kinase assay

ATM kinase assays were performed with 0.2 nM dimeric ATM, 50 nM GST–p53 substrate, and varying amounts of MRN complex (concentrations of MRN = 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 nM). Kinase assays were performed in kinase buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mM potassium chloride, 5 mM magnesium chloride, 10% glycerol, 1 mM ATP, 1 mM DTT, and 10 ng DNA) for 90 min at 30°C in a volume of 40 microliters as described earlier [91]. Phosphorylated p53 (ser15) was detected as described earlier [91] using phospho-specific antibody from Calbiochem (PC461).

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Sliding window analyses of all genes in the NHEJ pathway. The sliding window analysis of dN/dS along the length of each NHEJ gene is shown. In each case, three pairwise alignments were analyzed (human and orangutan comparison in pink, human and rhesus comparison in green, rhesus and marmoset comparison in orange). The maximum dN/dS value in each comparison was analyzed for statistical significance (dN/dS>1); an asterisk indicates statistically significant peaks (p<0.05).

(0.08 MB PDF)

Table S1

Primate samples used in study.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S2

Details of PCR and sequencing strategies.

(0.06 MB PDF)

Table S3

Primers used for amplification and sequencing of NHEJ genes.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S4

PAML analysis of primate NBS1 sequences.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S5

PAML analysis of primate CtIP sequences.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S6

PAML analysis of primate Artemis sequences.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S7

PAML analysis of primate XRCC4 sequences.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S8

PAML analysis of primate Polλ sequences.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S9

PAML analysis of primate XLF sequences.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S10

Branch-site test for positive selection in the hominoid clade for primate NHEJ genes.

(0.60 MB EPS)

Table S11

Variable codon models in NBS1 branch-site test for positive selection.

(0.50 MB EPS)

Table S12

Summary of human population genetic tests performed on HapMap data.

(0.04 MB PDF)


We thank primate and HapMap sequencing consortiums, and the UCSC genome browser team, for the valuable resources that they have generated. We thank Dr. Welkin Johnson at New England Primate Research Center for providing macaque cell lines and Dr. Laurence Hurst at the University of Bath for sharing the computer program SLIDERKK. We thank Nicholas Meyerson for assisting with statistical analysis. We thank Rajashree Deshpande, Aisha Ellahi, Kyudong Han, Dianne Lou, Harmit Malik, Nicholas Meyerson, Maulik Patel, and Paul Rowley for comments on the manuscript.


The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This work was supported by grant number 107447-45-RGNT (to SLS) from amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research. SLS and PCS hold Career Awards in the Biomedical Sciences from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. SLS is an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow in Computational and Evolutionary Molecular Biology. PCS was supported by a Packard Fellowship in Science and Engineering. Research performed in the Paull laboratory was supported by NIH R01 CA132813 (to TTP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Lieber MR. The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:1–5. [PubMed]
2. Sawyer SL, Malik HS. Positive selection of yeast nonhomologous end-joining genes and a retrotransposon conflict hypothesis. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17614–17619. [PubMed]
3. Barreiro LB, Laval G, Quach H, Patin E, Quintana-Murci L. Natural selection has driven population differentiation in modern humans. Nat Genet. 2008;40:340–345. [PubMed]
4. Bustamante CD, Fledel-Alon A, Williamson S, Nielsen R, Hubisz MT, et al. Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. Nature. 2005;437:1153–1157. [PubMed]
5. Mikkelsen TS, Hillier LW, Eichler EE, Zody MC, Jaffe DB, et al. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature. 2005;437:69–87. [PubMed]
6. Clark AG, Glanowski S, Nielsen R, Thomas PD, Kejariwal A, et al. Inferring Nonneutral Evolution from Human-Chimp-Mouse Orthologous Gene Trios. Science. 2003;302:1960–1963. [PubMed]
7. Kosiol C, Vinar T, da Fonseca RR, Hubisz MJ, Bustamante CD, et al. Patterns of Positive Selection in Six Mammalian Genomes. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000144. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Sabeti PC, Schaffner SF, Fry B, Lohmueller J, Varilly P, et al. Positive natural selection in the human lineage. Science. 2006;312:1614–1620. [PubMed]
9. Sabeti PC, Varilly P, Fry B, Lohmueller J, Hostetter E, et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature. 2007;449:913–918. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Voight BF, Kudaravalli S, Wen XQ, Pritchard JK. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e72. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040072. [PubMed]
11. Pâques F, Haber JE. Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol R. 1999;63:349–404. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Roth C, Liberles DA. A systematic search for positive selection in higher plants (Embryophytes). BMC Plant Biol. 2006;6 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:1751–1761. [PubMed]
14. Bustamante CD, Townsend JP, Hartl DL. Solvent accessibility and purifying selection within proteins of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:301–308. [PubMed]
15. Bishop JG, Dean AM, Mitchell-Olds T. Rapid evolution in plant chitinases: Molecular targets of selection in plant-pathogen coevolution. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;97:5322–5327. [PubMed]
16. Yang Z, Swanson WJ. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19:49–57. [PubMed]
17. Bishop JG, Ripoll DR, Bashir S, Damasceno CMB, Seeds JD, et al. Selection on glycine beta-1,3-endoglucanase genes differentially inhibited by a phytophthora glucanase inhibitor protein. Genetics. 2005;169:1009–1019. [PubMed]
18. Ivarsson Y, Mackey AJ, Edalat M, Pearson WR, Mannervik B. Identification of residues in glutathione transferase capable of driving functional diversification in evolution - A novel approach to protein redesign. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:8733–8738. [PubMed]
19. Sawyer SL, Wu LI, Emerman M, Malik HS. Positive selection of primate TRIM5alpha identifies a critical species-specific retroviral restriction domain. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:2832–2837. [PubMed]
20. Clark NL, Swanson WJ. Pervasive adaptive evolution in primate seminal proteins. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:e35. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010035. [PubMed]
21. Elde NC, Child SJ, Geballe AP, Malik HS. Protein kinase R reveals an evolutionary model for defeating viral mimicry. Nature. 2009;457:485–489. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Swanson WJ, Vacquier VD. Concerted evolution in an egg receptor for a rapidly evolving abalone sperm protein. Science. 1998;281:710–712. [PubMed]
23. Oliver PL, Goodstadt L, Bayes JJ, Birtle Z, Roach KC, et al. Accelerated Evolution of the Prdm9 Speciation Gene across Diverse Metazoan Taxa. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000753. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Malik HS, Henikoff S. Adaptive evolution of Cid, a centromere-specific histone in Drosophila. Genetics. 2001;157:1293–1298. [PubMed]
25. Parmley JL, Hurst LD. How common are intragene windows with KA>KS owing to purifying selection on synonymous mutations? J Mol Evol. 2007;64:646–655. [PubMed]
26. Hurst LD. The Ka/Ks ratio: diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet. 2002;18:486–487. [PubMed]
27. Schmid K, Yang Z. The trouble with sliding windows and the selective pressure in BRCA1. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003746. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Sawyer SL, Emerman M, Malik HS. Ancient Adaptive Evolution of the Primate Antiviral DNA-Editing Enzyme APOBEC3G. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020275. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Pavlicek A, Jurka J. Positive selection on the nonhomologous end-joining factor Cernunnos-XLF in the human lineage. Biol Direct. 2006;2:15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Purvis A. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos T Roy Soc B. 1995;348:405–421. [PubMed]
31. Yang Z. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997;13:555–556. [PubMed]
32. Yang ZH. Inference of selection from multiple species alignments. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12:688–694. [PubMed]
33. Yang Z, Bielawski JP. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000;15:496–503. [PubMed]
34. Zhang JZ, Nielsen R, Yang ZH. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:2472–2479. [PubMed]
35. Anisimova M, Bielawski JP, Yang Z. Accuracy and power of bayes prediction of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19:950–958. [PubMed]
36. Garcia-Diaz M, Bebenek K, Gao GH, Pedersen LC, London RE, et al. Structure-function studies of DNA polymerase lambda. DNA Repair. 2005;4:1358–1367. [PubMed]
37. Garcia-Diaz M, Bebenek K, Krahn JM, Pedersen LC, Kunkel TA. Structural analysis of strand misalignment during DNA synthesis by a human DNA polymerase. Cell. 2006;124:331–342. [PubMed]
38. Sibanda BL, Critchlow SE, Begun J, Pei XY, Jackson SP, et al. Crystal structure of an Xrcc4-DNA ligase IV complex. Nat Struct Biol. 2001;8:1015–1019. [PubMed]
39. Grawunder U, Zimmer D, Kulesza P, Lieber MR. Requirement for an interaction of XRCC4 with DNA ligase IV for wild-type V(D)J recombination and DNA double-strand break repair in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:24708–24714. [PubMed]
40. Mizuta R, Cheng HL, Gao YJ, Alt FW. Molecular genetic characterization of XRCC4 function. Int Immunol. 1997;9:1607–1613. [PubMed]
41. Yurchenko V, Xue Z, Sadofsky MJ. SUMO modification of human XRCC4 regulates its localization and function in DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:1786–1794. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Lee KJ, Jovanovic M, Udayakumar D, Bladen CL, Dynan WS. Identification of DNA-PKcs phosphorylation sites in XRCC4 and effects of mutations at these sites on DNA end joining in a cell-free system. DNA Repair. 2004;3:267–276. [PubMed]
43. Tseng HC, Tsai MH, Chiu CF, Wang CH, Chang NW, et al. Association of XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism with oral cancer susceptibility in Taiwan. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:1687–1691. [PubMed]
44. The International HapMap Consortium. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature. 2007;449:851–861. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Grossman SR, Shylakhter I, Karlsson EK, Byrne EH, Morales S, et al. A Composite of Multiple Signals Distinguishes Causal Variants in Regions of Positive Selection. Science. 2010;327:883–886. [PubMed]
46. Kelley JL, Turkheimer K, Haney M, Swanson WJ. Targeted resequencing of two genes, RAGE and POLL, confirms findings from a genome-wide scan for adaptive evolution and provides evidence for positive selection in additional populations. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:779–784. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Williams RS, Williams JS, Tainer JA. Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 is a keystone complex connecting DNA repair machinery, double-strand break signaling, and the chromatin template. Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;85:509–520. [PubMed]
48. Williams RS, Dodson GE, Limbo O, Yamada Y, Williams JS, et al. Nbs1 flexibly tethers Ctp1 and Mre11-Rad50 to Coordinate DNA Double-Strand Break Processing and Repair. Cell. 2009;139:87–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Lu MX, Lu JC, Yang XB, Yang M, Tan H, et al. Association between the NBS1 E185Q polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2009;9 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Medina PP, Ahrendt SA, Pollan M, Fernandez P, Sidransky D, et al. Screening of homologous recombination gene polymorphisms in lung cancer patients reveals an association of the NBS1-185GIn variant and p53 gene mutations. Cancer Epidem Biomar. 2003;12:699–704. [PubMed]
51. Margulis V, Lin J, Yang HS, Wang W, Wood CG, et al. Genetic susceptibility to renal cell carcinoma: The role of DNA double-strand break repair pathway. Cancer Epidem Biomar. 2008;17:2366–2373. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Thirumaran RK, Bermejo JL, Rudnai P, Gurzau E, Koppova K, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and basal cell carcinoma of skin. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:1676–1681. [PubMed]
53. Chapman JR, Jackson SP. Phospho-dependent interactions between NBS1 and MDC1 mediate chromatin retention of the MRN complex at sites of DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:795–801. [PubMed]
54. Spycher C, Miller ES, Townsend K, Pavic L, Morrice NA, et al. Constitutive phosphorylation of MDC1 physically links the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex to damaged chromatin. J Cell Biol. 2008;181:227–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Melander F, Bekker-Jensen S, Falck J, Bartek J, Mailand N, et al. Phosphorylation of SDT repeats in the MDC1 N terminus triggers retention of NBS1 at the DNA damage-modified chromatin. J Cell Biol. 2008;181:213–226. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Wu LM, Luo KT, Lou ZK, Chen JJ. MDC1 regulates intra-S-phase checkpoint by targeting NBS1 to DNA double-strand breaks. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11200–11205. [PubMed]
57. Lee JH, Paull TT. ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science. 2005;308:551–554. [PubMed]
58. Uziel T, Lerenthal Y, Moyal L, Andegeko Y, Mittelman L, et al. Requirement of the MRN complex for ATM activation by DNA damage. EMBO J. 2003;22:5612–5621. [PubMed]
59. Matsuzaki K, Shinohara A, Shinohara M. Forkhead-associated domain of yeast Xrs2, a homolog of human Nbs1, promotes nonhomologous end joining through interaction with a ligase IV partner protein, Lif1. Genetics. 2008;179:213–225. [PubMed]
60. Stracker TH, Carson CT, Weitzman MD. Adenovirus oncoproteins inactivate the Mre11-Rad50-NBS1 DNA repair complex. Nature. 2002;418:348–352. [PubMed]
61. Weitzman MD, Ornelles DA. Inactivating intracellular antiviral responses during adenovirus infection. Oncogene. 2005;24:7686–7696. [PubMed]
62. Evans JD, Hearing P. Relocalization of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex by the adenovirus E4 ORF3 protein is required for viral replication. J Virol. 2005;79:6207–6215. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Jayaram S, Gilson T, Ehrlich ES, Yu XF, Ketner G, et al. E1B 55k-independent dissociation of the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex by E4 34k during adenovirus infection. Virology. 2008;382:163–170. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Bruton RK, Rasti M, Mapp KL, Young N, Carter RZ, et al. C-terminal-binding protein interacting protein binds directly to adenovirus early region 1A through its N-terminal region and conserved region 3. Oncogene. 2007;26:7467–7479. [PubMed]
65. Roy S, Vandenberghe LH, Kryazhimskiy S, Grant R, Calcedo R, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Adenoviruses Persistently Shed from the Gastrointestinal Tract of Non-Human Primates. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000503. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000503. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Smith JA, Daniel R. Following the path of the virus: the exploitation of host DNA repair mechanisms by retroviruses. ACS Chem Biol. 2006;1:217–226. [PubMed]
67. Li L, Olvera JM, Yoder KE, Mitchell RS, Butler SL, et al. Role of the non-homologous DNA end joining pathway in the early steps of retroviral infection. EMBO J. 2001;20:3272–3281. [PubMed]
68. Kilzer JM, Stracker T, Beitzel B, Meek K, Weitzman M, et al. Roles of host cell factors in circularization of retroviral DNA. Virology. 2003;314:460–467. [PubMed]
69. Daniel R, Greger JG, Katz RA, Taganov KD, Wu X, et al. Evidence that stable retroviral transduction and cell survival following DNA integration depend on components of the nonhomologous end joining repair pathway. J Virol. 2004;78:8573–8581. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Daniel R, Katz RA, Skalka AM. A role for DNA-PK in retroviral DNA integration. Science. 1999;284:644–647. [PubMed]
71. Smith JA, Wang FX, Zhang H, Wu KJ, Williams KJ, et al. Evidence that the Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein, an early sensor of double-strand DNA breaks (DSB), is involved in HIV-1 post-integration repair by recruiting the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase in a process similar to, but distinct from, cellular DSB repair. Virol J. 2008;5 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
72. Studamire B, Goff SP. Host proteins interacting with the Moloney murine leukemia virus integrase: multiple transcriptional regulators and chromatin binding factors. Retrovirology. 2008;5 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Lin C-W, Engelman A. The Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor Is a component of functional Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 preintegration complexes. J Virol. 2003;77:5030–5036. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Lau A, Kanaar R, Jackson SP, O'Connor MJ. Suppression of retroviral infection by the RAD52 DNA repair protein. EMBO J. 2004;23:3421–3429. [PubMed]
75. Gibbs RA, Rogers J, Katze MG, Bumgarner R, Weinstock GM, et al. Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome. Science. 2007;316:222–234. [PubMed]
76. Lilley CE, Schwartz RA, Weitzman MD. Using or abusing: viruses and the cellular DNA damage response. Trends Microbiol. 2007;15:119–126. [PubMed]
77. Bailey SG, Verrall E, Schelcher C, Rhie A, Doherty AJ, et al. Functional Interaction between Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Protein Zta and Host DNA Damage Response Protein 53BP1. J Virol. 2009;83:11116–11122. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Abbott KL, Archambault J, Xiao H, Nguyen BD, Roeder RG, et al. Interactions of the HIV-1 tat and RAP74 proteins with the RNA polymerase IICTD phosphatase FCP1. Biochemistry. 2005;44:2716–2731. [PubMed]
79. Nyswaner KM, Checkley MA, Yi M, Stephenst RM, Garfinkel DJ. Chromatin-associated genes protect the yeast genome from Ty1 insertional mutagenesis. Genetics. 2008;178:197–214. [PubMed]
80. Downs JA, Jackson SP. Involvement of DNA end-binding protein Ku in Ty element retrotransposition. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:6260–6268. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Suzuki J, Yamaguchi K, Kajikawa M, Ichiyanagi K, Adachi N, et al. Genetic evidence that the non-homologous end-joining repair pathway is involved in LINE retrotransposition. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000461. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Pitcher RS, Tonkin LM, Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Green AJ, et al. Mycobacteriophage exploit NHEJ to facilitate genome circularization. Mol Cell. 2006;23:743–748. [PubMed]
83. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996–1006. [PubMed]
84. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Comeron JM. K-Estimator: Calculation of the number of nucleotide substitutions per site and the confidence intervals. Bioinformatics. 1999;15:763–764. [PubMed]
86. Schaffner SF, Foo C, Gabriel S, Reich D, Daly MJ, et al. Calibrating a coalescent simulation of human genome sequence variation. Genome Res. 2005;15:1576–1583. [PubMed]
87. Cockerham CC, Weir BS. Estimation of inbreeding parameters in stratified populations. Ann Hum Genet. 1986;50:271–281. [PubMed]
88. Lee JH, Goodarzi AA, Jeggo PA, Paull TT. 53BP1 promotes ATM activity through direct interactions with the MRN complex. EMBO J. 2010;29:574–585. [PubMed]
89. Lee JH, Paull TT. Direct activation of the ATM protein kinase by the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex. Science. 2004;304:93–96. [PubMed]
90. Bhaskara V, Dupre A, Lengsfeld B, Hopkins BB, Chan A, et al. Rad50 adenylate kinase activity regulates DNA tethering by Mre11/Rad50 complexes. Mol Cell. 2007;25:647–661. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Lee JH, Paull TT. Purification and biochemical characterization of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1. Method Enzymol. 2006;408:529–539. [PubMed]
92. Paull TT, Cortez D, Bowers B, Elledge SJ, Gellert M. Direct DNA binding by Brca1. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:6086–6091. [PubMed]
93. Bryson K, McGuffin LJ, Marsden RL, Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, et al. Protein structure prediction servers at university college london. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W36–W38. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science