1. Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine. 6th edition. London, UK: Victor Gollancz; 1833. translated from the German 1921.
2. Steinsbekk A, Launsø L. Empowering the cancer patient or controlling the tumor? A qualitative study of how cancer patients experience consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and physicians, respectively. Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2005;4(2):195–200. [PubMed]
3. Brien S, Dibb B, Burch AL. The use of intuition in homeopathic clinical decision making: an interpretive phenomenological study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. In press.
4. Barry CA, Stevenson FA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice. Social Science and Medicine. 2001;53(4):487–505. [PubMed]
5. May C, Sirur D. Art, science and placebo: incorporating homeopathy in general practice. Sociology of Health and Illness. 1998;20(2):168–190.
6. Burch AL, Dibb B, Brien SB. Understanding homeopathic decision-making: a qualitative study. Forschende Komplementarmedizin. 2008;15(4):218–225. [PubMed] 7. Launsø L, Rieper J. General practitioners and classical homeopaths treatment models for asthma and allergy. Homeopathy. 2005;94(1):17–25. [PubMed] 8. Richardson J. What patients expect from complementary therapy: a qualitative study. American Journal of Public Health. 2004;94(6):1049–1053. [PubMed]
9. McIntosh CDD, Ogunbanjo GA. Why do patients choose to consult homeopaths? An exploratory study. South African Family Practice. 2008;50(3):69–71.
10. Mercer SW, Reilly D. A qualitative study of patient’s views on the consultation at the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital, an NHS integrative complementary and orthodox medical care unit. Patient Education and Counseling. 2004;53(1):13–18. [PubMed]
11. Cant S. Understanding why people use complementary and alternative medicine. In: Heller T, Treween GL, Katz J, Stone J, Spurr S, editors. Perspectives on Complementary and Alternative Medicine. London, UK: Routledge; 2005. pp. 173–204.
12. Patriani Justo CM, de Andrea Gomes MH. Conceptions of health, illness and treatment of patients who use homeopathy in Santos, Brazil. Homeopathy. 2008;97(1):22–27. [PubMed] 13. Cartwright T, Torr R. Making sense of illness: the experiences of users of complementary medicine. Journal of Health Psychology. 2005;10(4):559–572. [PubMed] 14. Bell IR, Koithan M, Gorman MM, Baldwin CM. Homeopathic practitioner views of changes in patients undergoing constitutional treatment for chronic disease. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2003;9(1):39–50. [PubMed] 15. Thomas KJ, Nicholl JP, Coleman P. Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2001;9(1):2–11. [PubMed] 16. Menniti-Ippolito F, Gargiulo L, Bologna E, Forcella E, Raschetti R. Use of unconventional medicine in Italy: a nation-wide survey. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2002;58(1):61–64. [PubMed] 17. Schäfer T, Riehle A, Wichmann H-E, Ring J. Alternative medicine in allergies—prevalence, patterns of use, and costs. Allergy. 2002;57(8):694–700. [PubMed] 18. Thomas K, Coleman P. Use of complementary or alternative medicine in a general population in Great Britain. Results from the National Omnibus survey. Journal of Public Health. 2004;26(2):152–157. [PubMed] 19. Luff D, Thomas KJ. ’Getting somewhere’, feeling cared for: patients’ perspectives on complementary therapies in the NHS. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2000;8(4):253–259. [PubMed] 20. Witt CM, Lüdtke R, Baur R, Willich SN. Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients. BMC Public Health. 2005;5(1) Article ID 115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 21. Spence DS, Thompson EA, Barron SJ. Homeopathic treatment for chronic disease: a 6-year, university-hospital outpatient observational study. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2005;11(5):793–798. [PubMed] 23. Weingärtner O. The nature of the active ingredient in ultramolecular dilutions. Homeopathy. 2007;96(3):220–226. [PubMed] 24. Fisher P. On the plausibility of Homeopathy. Homeopathy. 2008;97(1):1–2. [PubMed] 25. Witt CM, Bluth M, Albrecht H, Weißhuhn TER, Baumgartner S, Willich SN. The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies—a systematic review of the literature. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2007;15(2):128–138. [PubMed] 26. Kassab S, Cummings M, Berkovitz S, Van Haselen R, Fisher P. Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;(2) Article ID CD004845. [PubMed] 27. Lüdtke R, Rutten ALB. The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2008;61(12):1197–1204. [PubMed] 28. Jonas WB, Kaptchuk TJ, Linde K. A critical overview of homeopathy. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2003;138(5):393–399. [PubMed] 29. Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. The Lancet. 2005;366(9487):726–732. [PubMed] 30. Bellavite P, Ortolani R, Pontarollo F, Piasere V, Benato G, Conforti A. Immunology and homeopathy. 4. Clinical studies—part 2. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2006;3(4):397–409. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 31. Zimmermann-Viehoff F, Meissner K. Homeopathy and placebo—synonym, similar or different? Forschende Komplementarmedizin. 2007;14(4):247–248. [PubMed] 32. Ernst E. Placebo, deceit and complementary/alternative medicine. Climacteric. 2007;10(2):85–87. [PubMed] 33. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2001;357(9258):757–762. [PubMed] 34. Ong LML, De Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine. 1995;40(7):903–918. [PubMed] 35. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. Journal of Family Practice. 2000;49(9):796–804. [PubMed]
36. Brien SB, Lachance L, Prescott P, McDermott C, Lewith G. Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients which are attributable to the consultation process not the homeopathic remedy? A randomised controlled clinical trial. Rheumatology. In press.
37. Vincent C, Furnham A. Why do patients turn to complementary medicine? An empirical study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1996;35(1):37–48. [PubMed] 38. Thorne S, Paterson B, Russell C, Schultz A. Complementary/alternative medicine in chronic illness as informed self-care decision making. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2002;39(7):671–683. [PubMed] 39. Shaw A, Thompson EA, Sharp D. Complementary therapy use by patients and parents of children with asthma and the implications for NHS care: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2006;6(1) Article ID 76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 40. Bikker AP, Mercer SW, Reilly D. A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months in patients going to the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2005;11(4):591–600. [PubMed] 41. Mercer SW, Reilly D, Watt GCM. The importance of empathy in the enablement of patients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. British Journal of General Practice. 2002;52(484):901–905. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Ruusuvuori J. “Empathy” and “sympathy” in action: attending to patients’ troubles in Fnnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2005;68(3):204–222.
43. Chatwin J. Communication in homoeopathic therapeutic encounters. University of York; 2003. Ph.D. thesis.
44. Hartog CS. Elements of effective communication-Rediscoveries from homeopathy. Patient Education and Counseling. 2009;77(2):172–178. [PubMed] 45. Frank R. Homeopath & patient—a dyad of harmony? Social Science and Medicine. 2002;55(8):1285–1296. [PubMed]
46. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA: Sage; 2002.
47. Charmaz K. Grounded Theory objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd edition. London, UK: Sage; 2000.
48. Glaser BG. Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, Calif, USA: Sociology Press; 1978.
49. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY, USA: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
50. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal. 1995;311(6996):42–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 51. Boon H, MacPherson H, Fleishman S, et al. Evaluating complex healthcare systems: a critique of four approaches. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2007;4(3):279–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 52. Fonnebo V, Grimsgaard S, Walach H, et al. Researching complementary and alternative treatments—the gatekeepers are not at home. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2007;7(1) Article ID 7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Rubin HJ, Rubin I. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA: Sage; 1995.
54. Glaser BG. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence versus Forcing. Mill Valley, Calif, USA: Sociology Press; 1992.
55. Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspectives and Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall; 1969.
56. Timmermans S, Tavory I. Advancing ethnographic research through grounded theory practice. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London, UK: Sage; 2007.
57. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. 3rd edition. London, UK: Sage; 2006.
58. Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 3rd edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008.
59. Milligan C, Bingley A, Gatrell A. Digging deep: using diary techniques to explore the place of health and well-being amongst older people. Social Science and Medicine. 2005;61(9):1882–1892. [PubMed]
61. Mackrill T. Solicited diary studies of psychotherapy in qualitative research-pros and cons. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling. 2008;10(1):5–18.
62. Owen D. Principles and Practice of Homeopathy: The Therapeutic and Healing Process. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2007.
63. Winston J. The Faces of Homoeopathy: An Illustrated History of the First 200 Years. Tawa, New Zealand: Great Auk; 1999.
64. Thompson TDB, Weiss M. Homeopathy—what are the active ingredients? An exploratory study using the UK Medical Research Council’s framework for the evaluation of complex interventions. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2006;6(1) Article ID 37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 65. Davis MA. A perspective on cultivating clinical empathy. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 2009;15(2):76–79. [PubMed] 66. Koithan M, Verhoef M, Bell IR, White M, Mulkins A, Ritenbaugh C. The process of whole person healing: “Unstuckness” and beyond. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2007;13(6):659–668. [PubMed] 67. Mercer SW, Watt GCM. Empathy is important for enablement. British Medical Journal. 2001;322(7290):p. 865. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 68. Norfolk T, Birdi K, Walsh D. The role of empathy in establishing rapport in the consultation: a new model. Medical Education. 2007;41(7):690–697. [PubMed]
69. Ryan S. The case for supervision in homeopathy. The Homeopath. 1996;60:520–523.
70. Ryan S. Whats in a case? Supervising homeopathic practice. The Homeopath. 2002;85
71. Kaplan B. The Homeopathic Conversation: The Art of Taking the Case. 2nd edition. London, UK: Natural Medicine Press; 2002.
72. Bond M. No alternative—the complementary medicine detective. New Scientist, 2008.
73. Samarasekera U. Pressure grows against homeopathy in the UK. The Lancet. 2007;370(9600):1677–1678. [PubMed] 74. Goldacre B. Benefits and risks of homoeopathy. The Lancet. 2007;370(9600):1672–1673. [PubMed] 75. Ernst E. Is homeopathy a clinically valuable approach? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2005;26(11):547–548. [PubMed] 76. Editorial. The end of homoeopathy. The Lancet. 2005;366(9487):p. 690. [PubMed] 77. Campbell C. Medicine, rhetoric and undermining: managing credibility in homeopathic practice. Homeopathy. 2008;97(2):76–82. [PubMed]
78. Balint M. The Doctor, His Patient and the Illness. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
79. Hyland ME. A tale of two therapies: psychotherapy and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and the human effect. Clinical Medicine. 2005;5(4):361–367. [PubMed]
80. Rogers CR. Client Centered Therapy. London, UK: Constable; 2002.
81. Ackerman SJ, Hilsenroth MJ. A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychology Review. 2003;23(1):1–33. [PubMed]
82. Ackerman SJ, Hilsenroth MJ. A review of therapist characteristics and techniques negatively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy. 2001;38(2):171–185.
83. Kleinman A. The Illness Narratives; Suffering Healing & the Human Condition. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books; 1988.
84. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes, at least two to tango) Social Science and Medicine. 1997;44(5):681–692. [PubMed] 86. Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2001;165(2):174–179. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 87. Linde K, Witt CM, Streng A, et al. The impact of patient expectations on outcomes in four randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in patients with chronic pain. Pain. 2007;128(3):264–271. [PubMed] 88. Launsø L, Henningsen I, Rieper J, Brender H, Sandø F, Hvenegaard A. Expectations and effectiveness of medical treatment and classical homeopathic treatment for patients with hypersensitivity illnesses. One year prospective study. Homeopathy. 2007;96(4):233–242. [PubMed]
89. Launer JMN. Narrative-Based Primary Care: A Practical Guide. Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002.
90. Greenhalgh T, Hurwitz B. Narrative Based Medicine. London, UK: BMJ Books; 1998.
91. Shapiro J. The use of narrative in the doctor-patient encounter. Family Systems Medicine. 1993;11(1):47–53.
92. Charon R. Narrative and Medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;350(9):862–864. [PubMed]
93. Chanda P, Furnham A. Does homoeopathy work? Part I: a review of studies on patient and practitioner reports. Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 2008;13(2):82–89.
94. Pennebaker JW. Telling stories: the health benefits of narrative. Literature and Medicine. 2000;19(1):3–18. [PubMed]
95. Frank AW. The Wounded Story Teller. Body, Illness and Ethics. Chicago, Ill, USA: University of Chicago Press; 1998.
96. Pennebaker JW, Seagal JD. Forming a story: the health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1999;55(10):1243–1254. [PubMed] 97. Wynn R, Pettersen G. Commentary on ‘elements of effective communication—rediscoveries from homeopathy’ by CS Hartog. Patient Education and Counseling. 2009;77(2):172–178. [PubMed] 98. Howie JGR, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ, Freeman GK, Rai H. Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal. 1999;319(7212):738–743. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 99. Wilson A, Childs S. The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice. 2002;52(485):1012–1020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 100. Howie JGR, Porter AMD, Heaney DJ, Hopton JL. Long to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 1991;41(343):48–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 101. Cape J. Consultation length, patient-estimated consultation length, and satisfaction with the consultation. British Journal of General Practice. 2002;52(485):1004–1006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 102. Ogden J, Bavalia K, Bull M, et al. “I want more time with my doctor”: a quantitative study of time and the consultation. Family Practice. 2004;21(5):479–483. [PubMed] 103. Stevenson FA, Britten N, Barry CA, Barber N, Bradley CP. Qualitative methods and prescribing research. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2000;25(5):317–324. [PubMed]
104. Robinson T. Why homeopathy works at my practice. Pulse, 2009.
105. Weatherley-Jones E, Thompson EA, Thomas KJ. The placebo-controlled trial as a test of complementary and alternative medicine: observations from research experience of individualised homeopathic treatment. Homeopathy. 2004;93(4):186–189. [PubMed] 106. Verhoef MJ, Lewith G, Ritenbaugh C, Boon H, Fleishman S, Leis A. Complementary and alternative medicine whole systems research: beyond identification of inadequacies of the RCT. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2005;13(3):206–212. [PubMed]