PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Bioconjug Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 20.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2957894
NIHMSID: NIHMS144574

STED nanoscopy in living cells using Fluorogen Activating Proteins

Abstract

We demonstrate the effectiveness of a genetically encoded Malachite Green (MG) binding fluorogen activating protein (FAP) for live cell stimulated emission depletion nanoscopy (STED). Both extracellular and intracellular FAPs were tested in living cells using fluorogens with either membrane expressed FAP or as an intracellular FAP-actin fusion. Structures with FWHM of 110-122nm were observed. Depletion data however suggests a resolution of 70nm with the given instrument.

Fluorescence microscopy has experienced an explosive growth of use over the past three decades, transforming from a disparate set of optical techniques to a cohesive toolset of imaging methodologies for biological research. This transformation has been greatly facilitated by the development of bright photo-stable fluorescent probes ranging from organic dyes(1, 2) to genetically expressible fluorescent proteins(3) as targeted fusions at the molecular level. This, in conjunction with the development of new lasers and low-noise photodetectors has enabled the observation of many aspects of cell structure that were previously unseen. However, despite these incredible advances, conventional optical microscopy is inherently mismatched with biological length scales due to the far-field diffraction limit of light (λ/2NA); i.e. one cannot resolve objects that are separated by less than half the wavelength of light. This is particularly restrictive when the spatial location of multiple interacting objects is desired, especially when the size of most protein complexes are on the order of 10-50 nm, and even subcellular organelles have dimensions on the order of 100 nm. To overcome this fundamental obstacle, the last decade has seen the birth of the completely new field of far field superresolution optical microscopy, which has revealed many aspects of cellular ultra-structure previously only discernible in electron microscopy. Currently there are two distinct methodologies, one of which is based on single-molecule localization approaches, PALM (Photoactivation Localization Microscopy)(4, 5) and STORM (STochasic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy)(6) and the other on ensemble imaging employing either point-spread function engineering or low-frequency structured illumination(7, 8).

Ensemble methods rely on the manipulation of the point spread function (PSF) of the microscope while imaging a complete ensemble of molecules. One very successful approach is Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) nanoscopy(9). In this method an excitation laser beam is overlaid with a depletion laser that has an optically engineered point spread function, resulting in a much smaller effective fluorescing spot. Currently, the best attained STED resolution is 6 nm, obtained for photonic crystal centers(10).

Compared to localization, such ensemble methods do not routinely yield the same spatial resolution enhancements (especially in biological samples), but do provide much higher temporal resolution. In the case of STED, video rate imaging of 28 frames/second has been achieved allowing the observation of synaptic vesicle movement in living neurons(11). This is almost three orders of magnitude faster than the fastest PALM-based dynamic imaging reported to date at 0.04 frames/second(12). Further live cell STED with fluorescent proteins has been successfully demonstrated in imaging both dendritic spines(13) and the endoplasmic recticulum(14), both making use of Yellow Fluorescent Proteins (YFP). To minimize potential phototoxic effects in long-term live cell imaging experiments, especially with the high laser powers required for effective depletion, it is highly desirable to operate at wavelengths far to the red.

The far-red organic dye Atto647N has been applied in the case of video-rate STED of synaptic vesicle movement in living neurons(11) and to explore the nanoscale dynamics of lipid membranes using FCS-STED methodology(15). In addition, Atto655 has been used in conjunction with the Halo-Tag labeling technology to visualize β1-integrin in non-living HeLa cell filiapodia(16). Both of these dyes are compatible with the commercial Leica TCS STED system. Unfortunately these live cell approaches are inherently restrictive as they require either the uptake of a dye labeled lipid or antibody or internalization of an impermeant dye pre-bound to a genetic tag, which is not always biologically convenient. At present, no fluorescent protein has been reported to work with the commercial STED system in the same spectral range. As such, STED imaging of living cells in the far red has been limited to specific applications compatible with these labeling approaches. In order for the STED method to become generally useful for live cell imaging in the far red, it is highly desirable to have genetically targetable far-red fluorescent probes with quantum yields and spectral characteristics similar to those of the Atto Dyes. In this brief communication we describe the first use of genetically expressed fluorogen activating proteins (FAPs) that bind and activate the far-red fluorogenic dye Malachite Green for live-cell STED nanoscopy. These results using extra and intracellular compatible FAPs have widespread implications in the development of live cell STED nanoscopy for high-speed dynamic superresolution imaging.

Malachite Green is a far-red non-fluorescent organic dye that has been used to generate fluorescent signal when bound specifically to selected proteins (such as FAPs(17)) and nucleic acid aptamers(18). Because the dye exists in a non-fluorescent form it can be added to cells in media and/or buffer with no appreciable background signal. When the dye interacts specifically with its target, the fluorescence is activated up to ~20,000 fold resulting in genetically targetable, bright far-red emission. The photo-physical properties of Malachite Green are well-suited to excitation and depletion in the red and near infra-red spectral range as is available on the Leica TCS-STED system.

The STED potential for different Malachite Green binding extracellular FAP modules was evaluated using yeast cells displaying the FAP on the cell surface. Yeast cells were grown and induced as described in Szent-Gyorgy et. al. (17) and imaged as described in the Supplementary Data. Figure 1A illustrates the implementation of the STED microscope in a commercial apparatus. Briefly a visible red excitation spot is overlapped with a “donut” shaped engineered PSF of the infrared laser to enable shrinkage of the effective fluorescing spot size by stimulated emission. A variety of MG binding FAPs with 100nM of the MG-2p fluorogen were tested throughout a range of wavelengths (730-750nm) to elucidate which gave the most efficient depletion of fluorescence. The most promising module was L5-MG-L90S which is a single-point mutation of the native single-chain FAP (L5-MG). Figure 1B illustrates both confocal and STED images with the extracellular L5-MG-L90S expressed on the surface of yeast (average image acquisition times were 5 s at a 100 Hz scan speed, and images were averaged 4 times to improve the signal-to-noise ratio). This FAP has a quantum yield of 0.23 and excitation and emission characteristics comparable to the organic dye Atto647N which makes it amenable to commercial STED nanoscopy (see Table 1 for the characteristics of different FAP modules and Atto dyes). In order to quantify the gain in lateral resolution a 10 pixel wide region of interest was designated in the zoomed confocal and STED images (denoted by hollow white bars) and the fluorescence intensity was averaged using NIH ImageJ to generate the line profiles depicted in Figure 1C. The line profiles were fitted to one-dimensional Gaussian (confocal) or Lorentzian (STED) functions which yielded full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of 236nm and 122nm respectively. This measured FWHM is somewhat higher than the expected subdiffraction limited STED resolution from the measured depletion curves which is expected to be ~70nm for the given system and dye (see Supplementary Data) but is consistent with current estimates of the yeast cell wall thickness(19).

Figure 1
STED nanoscopy in living yeast cells
Table 1
Comparison of the photo-physical characteristics of Malachite Green binding Fluorogen Activating Proteins, MG FAPs (obtained from Szent-Gyorgyi et al (17)) and the Atto-Tec organic dyes (obtained from http://www.atto-tec.com/) used in far red STED nanoscopy. ...

As stated previously, the major benefit of using MG FAPs for STED nanoscopy is the unique ability to produce genetically targeted fusions in living cells. But, despite this advantage, to make the most use of STED as a high-speed superresolution imaging technology for cellular applications it is necessary to have a fluorescent probe that functions within the cytoplasm of living cells. Given the noted folding problems of scFvs in reducing environments due to the loss of the stabilizing disulfide bridges(20), the H6-MG FAP has been modified via site-directed mutagenesis to remove the cysteine residues and subsequent affinity maturation to regain fluorogenic activation (H6-MG-AFM—Manuscript in Preparation). This FAP has been expressed transiently as an N-terminal fusion to actin in living HeLa cells. Figure 2A illustrates visible stress fibers after labeling with 300nM of the permeant MG-ester fluorogen (average image acquisition times were 4 s at a 400 Hz scan speed, and images were averaged 8-10 times to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.). The optically zoomed panels show the increase in the lateral resolution with many features obscured in the confocal image becoming distinct in the STED image. To determine structure size, a 5 pixel wide region of interest was designated (denoted by the hollow white bar) and the fluorescence intensity averaged in NIH ImageJ to generate the line profiles depicted in Figure 2B. As before, the profiles were fitted to one-dimensional Gaussian and Lorentzian functions, yielding the FWHM of each peak. In the confocal image the fitted FWHM was 327nm and in the STED image was 110nm. This resolution is consistent with previous measures of actin stress fiber diameter via transmission electron microscopy (TEM)(21). In addition, living NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells also expressing the H6-AFM-MG FAP fused to actin, which were fixed and permeabilized and then labeled with 100nM MG-2p, still showed visible stress fibers despite the fixation process (see supplementary data). Hence these probes can be used for live cell STED and combined with conventional immunofluorescence assays in fixed cells.

Figure 2
STED nanoscopy in living HeLa cells

We have demonstrated the first use of fluorogen activating proteins for STED nanoscopy in living cells. The biological structures imaged exhibited FWHMs in STED that were reduced by up to a factor of three over confocal microscopy. In this case, the measured FWHM is likely due to the sizes of the actual biological structures measured(21) and does not reflect the true sub-diffraction limit of the probe and instrument. The ultimate achievable resolution as indicated by the depletion curves is equivalent to that of Atto647N which was determined to be ~70nm for the system used (see supplementary data). These new genetically targetable far-red probes coupled with STED nanoscopy have the potential for making long-term dynamic measurements of living cells at near video-rate and high resolution with reduced phototoxicity relative to conventional fluorescent proteins.

Synopsis

STED nanoscopy in living cells has been demonstrated using a genetically encoded fluorogen activating protein (FAP) which binds and activates the fluorescence of the “dark” fluorogenic dye Malachite Green (MG). A greater than two-fold enhancement over the diffraction limit was observed in the structures measured, for both extracellular and intracellular targets. Imaging was accomplished in the presence of excess fluorogenic dye without any required washing.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the NIH National Technology Center for Networks and Pathways for financial support under grant number 5U54RR022241 and Dr Erik Snapp for his kind assistance with cell culture and transfection experiments in HeLa cells. MB also wishes to acknowledge Carnegie Mellon University for faculty start-up funds.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Supporting information contains the following 1). materials and methods for the growth, transfection and imaging of yeast and mammalian cells, 2). the depletion efficiency of various different malachite green binding FAP modules, 3). the survival of the intracellular FAP module through fixation and permeabilization, 4). methods used to fit Gaussian and Lorentzian functions to extracted line profiles and 5). estimating the maximum achievable resolution using the Leica TCS-STED system. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.

References

1. Berlier JE, Rothe A, Buller G, Bradford J, Gray DR, Filanoski BJ, Telford WG, Yue S, Liu J, Cheung CY, Chang W, Hirsch JD, Beechem JM, Haugland RP. Quantitative comparison of long-wavelength Alexa Fluor dyes to Cy dyes: fluorescence of the dyes and their bioconjugates. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003;51:1699–712. [PubMed]
2. Mujumdar RB, Ernst LA, Mujumdar SR, Lewis CJ, Waggoner AS. Cyanine dye labeling reagents: sulfoindocyanine succinimidyl esters. Bioconjug Chem. 1993;4:105–11. [PubMed]
3. Shaner NC, Steinbach PA, Tsien RY. A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods. 2005;2:905–9. [PubMed]
4. Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S, Bonifacino JS, Davidson MW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess HF. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science. 2006;313:1642–5. [PubMed]
5. Hess ST, Girirajan TP, Mason MD. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys J. 2006;91:4258–72. [PubMed]
6. Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods. 2006;3:793–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Gustafsson MG. Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. J Microsc. 2000;198:82–7. [PubMed]
8. Gustafsson MG. Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:13081–6. [PubMed]
9. Hell SW, Wichmann J. Breaking the Diffraction Resolution Limit by Stimulated-Emission - Stimulated-Emission-Depletion Fluorescence Microscopy. Optics Letters. 1994;19:780–782. [PubMed]
10. Rittweger E, Han KY, Irvine SE, Eggeling C, Hell SW. STED microscopy reveals crystal colour centres with nanometric resolution. Nature Photonics. 2009;3:144–147.
11. Westphal V, Rizzoli SO, Lauterbach MA, Kamin D, Jahn R, Hell SW. Video-rate far-field optical nanoscopy dissects synaptic vesicle movement. Science. 2008;320:246–9. [PubMed]
12. Shroff H, Galbraith CG, Galbraith JA, Betzig E. Live-cell photoactivated localization microscopy of nanoscale adhesion dynamics. Nat Methods. 2008;5:417–23. [PubMed]
13. Nagerl UV, Willig KI, Hein B, Hell SW, Bonhoeffer T. Live-cell imaging of dendritic spines by STED microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18982–7. [PubMed]
14. Hein B, Willig KI, Hell SW. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) nanoscopy of a fluorescent protein-labeled organelle inside a living cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:14271–6. [PubMed]
15. Eggeling C, Ringemann C, Medda R, Schwarzmann G, Sandhoff K, Polyakova S, Belov VN, Hein B, von Middendorff C, Schonle A, Hell SW. Direct observation of the nanoscale dynamics of membrane lipids in a living cell. Nature. 2009;457:1159–62. [PubMed]
16. Schroder J, Benink H, Dyba M, Los GV. In vivo labeling method using a genetic construct for nanoscale resolution microscopy. Biophys J. 2009;96:L1–3. [PubMed]
17. Szent-Gyorgyi C, Schmidt BF, Creeger Y, Fisher GW, Zakel KL, Adler S, Fitzpatrick JA, Woolford CA, Yan Q, Vasilev KV, Berget PB, Bruchez MP, Jarvik JW, Waggoner A. Fluorogen-activating single-chain antibodies for imaging cell surface proteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:235–40. [PubMed]
18. Babendure JR, Adams SR, Tsien RY. Aptamers switch on fluorescence of triphenylmethane dyes. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:14716–7. [PubMed]
19. Klis FM, Boorsma A, De Groot PW. Cell wall construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2006;23:185–202. [PubMed]
20. Worn A, Pluckthun A. Stability engineering of antibody single-chain Fv fragments. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:989–1010. [PubMed]
21. Okabe S, Hirokawa N. Incorporation and turnover of biotin-labeled actin microinjected into fibroblastic cells: an immunoelectron microscopic study. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:1581–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Hell SW. Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science. 2007;316:1153–8. [PubMed]