Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(10): e13401.
Published online 2010 October 15. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0013401
PMCID: PMC2955533

NtGNL1 Plays an Essential Role in Pollen Tube Tip Growth and Orientation Likely via Regulation of Post-Golgi Trafficking

Diane Bassham, Editor



Tobacco GNOM LIKE 1 (NtGNL1), a new member of the Big/GBF family, is characterized by a sec 7 domain. Thus, we proposed that NtGNL1 may function in regulating pollen tube growth for vesicle trafficking.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To test this hypothesis, we used an RNAi technique to down-regulate NtGNL1 expression and found that pollen tube growth and orientation were clearly inhibited. Cytological observations revealed that both timing and behavior of endocytosis was disrupted, and endosome trafficking to prevacuolar compartments (PVC) or multivesicular bodies (MVB) was altered in pollen tube tips. Moreover, NtGNL1 seemed to partially overlap with Golgi bodies, but clearly colocalized with putative late endosome compartments. We also observed that in such pollen tubes, the Golgi apparatus disassembled and fused with the endoplasmic reticulum, indicating abnormal post-Golgi trafficking. During this process, actin organization was also remodeled.


Thus, we revealed that NtGNL1 is essential for pollen tube growth and orientation and it likely functions via stabilizing the structure of the Golgi apparatus and ensuring post-Golgi trafficking.


During fertilization in higher plants, pollen landing on the receptive stigma of the pistil germinates, producing a pollen tube that grows and carries male gametes to the embryo sac for final gamete fusion [1]. Two basic processes take place during pollen tube growth, tube extension and orientation, which ensure that the pollen tube reaches the correct destination. The pollen tube extends via tip growth, during which polarized apical secretion results in unidirectional cell expansion [2]. This provides an excellent example of polarized growth and an ideal model system for clarifying the processes of organization and regulation [3], thus attracting broad interest for several decades [4][6]. Extensive studies have revealed that the dynamic extension and orientation process requires organization of the cell cytoskeleton [7], the deposition of the cell wall [8], and the balance of exocytosis and endocytosis [9]. Recently, a great deal of attention has been given to the latter case, specifically, vesicle trafficking at the tube apex [9][11].

Many vesicle-trafficking-related compartments have been characterized via electron microscopy (EM) [12][14] and co-localization with the endocytic marker FM4-64 [15]. The potential markers of endosome compartments were used to visualize vesicle trafficking vividly [16]. Living pollen tubes serve as an excellent research system to view endocytosis using FM4-64 [17][19]. Recently, a network of endocytosis and secretory pathways was constructed [20]. The trans-Golgi network (TGN) localizes in the center junction of these two pathways and associates with early endosome trafficking to regulate post-Golgi trafficking [20][21].

It was reported that large ARF-GEFs (ADP-Ribosylation Factor, Guanine-nucleotide Exchange Factor) were in charge of GDP-to-GTP exchange for ARF activation, which activated ARF-GTP interaction with some effectors to regulate vesicle trafficking [22]. Scientists only found ARF1 in Arabidopsis [23]. Several ARF-GEFs identified in Arabidopsis are known to regulate recycling endosomes, in addition to activating substrates. The first ARF-GEF isolated in plants was GNOM, which is sensitive to BFA and regulates PIN1 recycling between the plasma membrane and cytosol [24]. The function of GNOM has been extensively studied. It plays a critical role in apical–basal axis formation during early embryogenesis [25] and in the initiation of lateral root primordia by mediating auxin transport [26]. Detailed analysis revealed that GNOM is located in endosomes and regulates PIN1 polar distribution [27]. Recent studies have further revealed that GNOM is involved in transcytosis [28], indicating its critical role in the establishment of cell polarity.

GNOM-LIKE 1 (AtGNL1), a BFA-resistant ARF-GEF, carries out conventional functions, regulating vesicle trafficking between ER and Golgi bodies in Arabidopsis [29][30]. Phenotype analysis of a gnl1 mutant revealed that competence in pollen tube competition was reduced. Additionally, AtGNL1 might be involved in PIN2 sorting to the vacuolar pathway [30]. Furthermore, BEN1 was also characterized as a new ARF-GEF family member to regulate early endosome trafficking in Arabidopsis using a fluorescence image-based screen [16]. These findings suggest that ARF-GEFs may play a critical role in regulating different stages of vesicle trafficking.

We have previously identified NtGNL1 in tobacco, and our data indicated that its role, except in embryonic cell division pattern and root elongation, was, surprisingly, in pollen tube development [31]. Twisted pollen tubes and expanded tips of pollen tubes were observed in its RNAi lines. Pollen tube elongation was greatly inhibited, suggesting that NtGNL1 anticipates its function in vesicle trafficking during pollen tube growth. As no genes in this family are reported to regulate pollen tube growth, we used an RNAi technique to down-regulate NtGNL1 expression and confirmed that NtGNL1 plays a critical role in pollen tube growth and orientation, and it likely functions via regulating post-Golgi trafficking.


Inhibition of NtGNL1 expression disturbs pollen germination and pollen tube growth

We previously observed that in NtGNL1 RNAi plants, both pollen tube growth and orientation were interrupted [31]. Given that no genes in this family have been found to play a role in pollen tube development, we further confirmed the phenotypes in RNAi plants. It was found that both germination frequency and pollen tube growth were greatly interrupted (Figure 1A, B), consistent with our previous results. We also further confirmed that NtGNL1 was indeed down-regulated in RNAi pollen (Figure 1C).

Figure 1
Pollen germination and pollen tube growth were inhibit in RNAi transgenic tobacco.

Temporal sequence of pollen tube FM4-64 uptake is disturbed by inhibiting NtGNL1

As reported previously, FM4-64 can trace endosome recycling at the apex of the pollen tube. FM4-64 entering the pollen tubes follows a strict temporal sequence from the plasma membrane to a population of small discrete internal structures, with subsequent appearance of the dye in the apical region and ultimately in vacuolar membranes [3]. To test whether abnormalities of pollen tube growth relate to vesicle trafficking, we compared the uptake process of FM4-64 in RNAi and normal samples to observe the dynamics of vesicle trafficking. In normal pollen tubes, the fluorescent signal of FM4-64 first appeared at the plasma membrane in the apex region (Figure 2A and B). Several minutes later, FM4-64 diffused to the interior apical region and displayed symmetry along the tip of the pollen tube (Figure 2C). This pattern remained for approximately 30 min (Figure 2D). Fluorescence spread to most parts of the pollen tube, remaining brightest in the apex (Figure 2E). However, RNAi pollen tubes grew in a zigzag pattern and displayed a different type of FM4-64 uptake. Specifically, when the pollen tubes began to turn, fluorescence appeared at the flank of the sub-apical region, not at the tip (Figure 2G). The distribution of the signal then gradually spread asymmetrically to the tip region (Figure 2H and I). Eventually, accumulated vesicles separated and moved backwards (Figure 2J). Clearly, diffusion of the FM4-64 signals was temporally disturbed in RNAi transgenic pollen tubes, and the time course and normal pace of endocytosis were inhibited due to down-regulation of NtGNL1.

Figure 2
Inhibiting NtGNL1 disturbed the temporal sequence of FM4-64 uptake in pollen tube.

Down-regulation of NtGNL1 Expression Results in an Altered Endosome Distribution Pattern

Following the application of FM4-64, we further compared endosome distribution patterns between the control and RNAi pollen tubes. In normal pollen tubes, fluorescence followed a symmetrical distribution, and a distinct gradient occurred at the tip. Typically, a reverse V-shaped distribution could be observed in control tubes (Figure 3A–C), whereas in RNAi pollen tubes, endosomes accumulated at the sub-apical region (Figure 3D–F). The endosome distribution pattern was obviously disturbed in these pollen tubes after the inhibition of NtGNL1expression. These results further demonstrate that NtGNL1 is involved in regulating endosome trafficking, which is essential for normal pollen tube growth and orientation.

Figure 3
Distribution patterns of endosomes in RNAi pollen tubes were altered after down-regulating NtGNL1 Expression.

Ultrastructural Observation Revealed Abnormal Post-Golgi Trafficking after NtGNL1 Inhibition

Ultrastructural observations were carried out to examine vesicle transport and compartmentalization at the pollen apex and sub-apical region. The tip of the pollen tube was divided into two parts, region I (about 3 µm from the apex) and region II (3–6 µm from the apex) (Figure 4A, B). Compared with wild-type pollen tubes, RNAi pollen tubes were more vacuolated (Figure 4C, D). We mainly observed the vesicles in region II. The diameters of the vesicles in wild-type pollen tubes were usually less than 0.2 µm, but they were larger in RNAi pollen tubes (Table 1). Furthermore, the proportion of general vesicles (smaller than 0.2 µm) was reduced from 92.54% to 85.26% (Table 1), implying abnormal endosome cycling at the pollen tip.

Figure 4
Ultrastructural observation of abnormal post-Golgi trafficking in RNAi pollen tubes.
Table 1
Various diameter of vesicles (%) compare in region II.

The size of the longest cistenae of Golgi stacks was proportional to the diameter of putative prevacuolar compartments/multivesicular bodies (PVCs/MVBs) in control pollen tubes (Figure 4E), whereas the putative PVCs/MVBs became much larger in RNAi pollen tubes (Figure 4F). This implies that vesicle trafficking might be disturbed in the transition of PVCs/MVBs to late endosomes or vacuoles.

The Golgi apparatus also exhibited a variety of abnormalities compared with wild-type (Figure 5A). Some Golgi stacks began to accumulate with PVCs (MVBs) in RNAi pollen tubes (Figure 5B), and some Golgi bodies showed piled up to each other or fragmentized (Figure 5C) compared with those in normal pollen tubes (Figure 5D) and with normal Golgi bodies in GNL1-down-regulated pollen tubes (Figure 5E). It was also observed that cis-Golgi curved into rings (Figure 5F) and expanded laterally (Figure 5G). This might reflect a prophase of Golgi-stack disassembly. We also observed that the Golgi apparatus began to fuse with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in pollen tubes (Figure 5H–J), a sign of Golgi structure collapse. So-called ER-Golgi hybrids in the pollen tubes of RNAi plants (Figure 5H–J) clearly suggested that vesicle trafficking between the ER and Golgi bodies was disrupted. In RNAi pollen tubes, about 50% of Golgi bodies showed abnormalities (Table 2). These results suggest that NtGNL1 functions in the vesicle transport between the Golgi apparatus and PVC (MVB) or ER to maintain normal Golgi apparatus activity, indicating that post-Golgi trafficking is regulated by NtGNL1.

Figure 5
Various abnormal structures of Golgi apparatus in NtGNL1 RNAi lines.
Table 2
Different Golgi bodies ratio (%) in RANi pollen tubes.

NtGNL1 is Colocalized with Putative PVCs and Partially Overlapped with Golgi Bodies

To further confirm whether NtGNL1 is indeed located at Golgi bodies and vesicles, we constructed pACTIN11-ST-DsRED and pACTIN11-Ntrab5-DsRED to mark Golgi bodies and late endosomes (PVCs/MVBs), respectively. Each was transferred into tobacco pollen tubes together with pACTIN11-NtGNL1-GFP by a transient expression system (Figure 6). It is clear that NtGNL1 (Figure 6F, shown in green) was distributed in the pollen tube and colocalized with PVCs (Figure 6F,shown in red). However, it seemed partially overlapped with Golgi bodies (Figure 6E, shown in red). These results confirmed its critical role in the vesicle trafficking mentioned above. In both cases, NtGNL1 exhibited more extensive distribution than ST or Ntrab5 signals in the pollen tube, as expected.

Figure 6
NtGNL1 colocalized with Golgi bodies and PVCs respectively.

Actin Cytoskeleton is Disorganized after NtGNL1 Inhibition

Given that endosome movement in the pollen apical region may be actin dependent, we examined actin cytoskeleton organization in the NtGNL1 expression-inhibited pollen tubes. By LAT52-promoted ABD2-GFP, we observed F-actin bundles in wild-type pollen tubes that were oriented parallel to the long axis of the pollen tubes (Figure 7A). However, these actin bundles did not extend to the clear zone of the pollen tubes (Figure 7A), which coincided with the typical model reported previously. Conversely, in RNAi pollen tubes, the F-actin cytoskeleton was obviously disorganized. Specifically, in the bulging, twisting pollen tubes, the actin bundles were thicker; they accumulated at the center of tubes and twisted and extended to the clear zone (Figure 7B–F). In bulging tips, these F-actin bundles even grew perpendicular to the long axis of the pollen tubes (Figure 7D), indicating loss of preprogrammed orientation. Some pollen tubes exhibited much thicker bundles and bends inside the RNAi pollen tubes, but fine structures were not observed in the tip region (Figure 7F).

Figure 7
F-actin disorganization in NtGNL1 RNAi pollen tubes.

To further elucidate the fine structure of F-actin in the tip region, particularly the fringe structure adjacent to the plasma membrane where endocytosis occurs, as well as in the clear zone where actin bundles normally terminate, we labeled the actin cytoskeleton with FITC–phalloidin in RNAi pollen tubes. In wild-type tubes, we observed the sub-apical cortical fringe structure, which was composed of short and fine actin bundles arranged in a parallel fashion perpendicular to the cell membrane (Figure 7G). At the clear zone of the pollen tube was a reverse V-shaped blank area, which coincided with the region occupied by a FM4-64-labeled vesicle organization of actins (Figure 5A). Conversely, most RNAi pollen tubes exhibited fine actin bundles within the clear zone that were arranged at random (Figure 7H) and shifted to the apex, which may be related to the disorientated vesicle trafficking previously observed in the pollen tip.


The phenotypes of the NtGNL1 RNAi transgenic lines confirmed that NtGNL1 indeed plays a critical role in regulating the polar extension of pollen tubes, the expected function of ARF-GEF in vesicle trafficking [24], [32][34]. Previous studies have reported that GNL1 regulates the formation of COPI-coated vesicles [29]. COPI-coated vesicles released from the Golgi apparatus accumulate by Brefeldin A (BFA) in mammalian cells [35], and a similar phenomenon was also observed in the tobacco BY-2 cells after BFA treatment [36]. This phenomenon suggested the existence of a BFA-sensitive ARF-GEF in tobacco. It was also reported that BFA treatment resulted in FM4-64 signals accumulating as small patches in tobacco pollen tubes [17]. In our experiments, RNAi pollen tubes showed abnormalities in the temporal sequence of FM4-64 uptake and its distribution pattern. FM4-64 signals were abnormally distributed as thick patches in the tip region of RNAi pollen tubes. This result indicates that the down-regulation of NtGNL1 disrupted vesicle trafficking from the tip to the sub-region of pollen tubes and resulted in similar phenotypes as those observed after BFA inhibition.

As previously reported, BFA treatment of BY-2 cells produces BFA compartments of PVCs/MVBs as well as other endosomal compartments and also forms ER-Golgi hybrids [36][37]. In the present study, we confirmed that NtGNL1 partially colocalized with Golgi bodies and overlapped with PVCs in pollen tubes. PVCs/MVBs, as part of post-Golgi trafficking [20][21], play a role in vesicle trafficking between the plasma membrane and Golgi bodies and in regulating the retrograde vesicle transport from the tip to the sub-region of the pollen tube. Ultrastructural observations indicated that when NtGNL1 was down-regulated, more vacuolated vesicles appeared at the tip of the pollen tube, indicating that vesicle trafficking was blocked by PVCs/MVBs. The cisternae of the Golgi apparatus were reduced and expanded laterally. Different phases of cisternae of Golgi apparatus fragmentation could also be observed. Moreover, so-called ER-Golgi hybrids were formed in pollen tubes, which likely interrupted the recycling of COPI-coated vesicles. These data suggest that NtGNL1 plays a critical role in regulating vesicle trafficking as one of the possible BFA-sensitive ARF-GEF systems in tobacco pollen tubes. The data also suggest that NtGNL1 may function by stabilizing the structure of the Golgi apparatus and maintaining COPI-coated vesicle recycling between the ER and Golgi apparatus. Based on these data, we assumed that the small vesicles from the Golgi apparatus were soon transformed to TGN or PVCs and thus, reduced their trafficking to the plasma membrane, which lowered the growth rate of the pollen tube and interrupted its orientation. By stabilizing the structure and function of the Golgi apparatus and maintaining properly oriented trafficking of early endosomes, NtGNL1 contributes to the balance of endocytosis and secretary functions, and therefore maintains proper pollen tube polar extension. Recently, two distinct endocytic pathways were identified in tobacco pollen tubes [38]. Further work examining NtGNL1 functions within distinct endosomal compartments may strengthen this proposal.

According to its sequence, NtGNL1 was predicted to be BFA sensitive in our previous report [31]. Therefore, it may be the target of BFA in pollen tubes. However, in Arabidopsis, GNL1 colocalized with Golgi bodies, but not with ARA7-labeled endosomes (PVCs) or FM4-64-labeled vesicles [29]. Furthermore, GNL1 was reported to be BFA resistant in Arabidopsis [29]. A recent report described that GNL1 serves a function in ER morphology in Arabidopsis [39]. Thus, NtGNL1 may function differently from AtGNL1 in the regulation of vesicle trafficking, at least in pollen tubes. Additionally, we found that actin organization was disturbed in NtGNL1 down-regulated pollen tubes. There is no report on the role of this gene family in regulating actin dynamic. It might be interesting to know how abnormal vesicle trafficking could, in turn, influence actin organization.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Nicotiana tabacum cv. Petite Havana SR1 plants were grown under 16 h of daylight at 25°C in a greenhouse or axenically in incubators. RNAi transgenic lines obtained from our previous work [31] were grown under the same conditions. Anthers were collected at room temperature to release pollen into the pollen germination medium (PGM).

Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growth

Pollen was cultured in medium modified from Sun et al. [40]: 20% (w/v) sucrose, 0.01% (w/v) boric acid, 0.1 mM calcium chloride, 3 mM MES (methyl ester sulfonate), pH 5.6, incubated in dark at 25°C for 10 h.

Antibody Preparation and Western Blot

NtGNL1 antibodies were prepared, and the Western blot for RNAi pollen was performed according to our previously published work [31].

Plasmid Construction and Particle Bombardment-mediated Transient Expression in Tobacco Pollen

ABD2 was under the control of the pollen specific promoter LAT52 [41]. NtGNL1 (NCBI:EF520731), ST, and Ntrab5 (NCBI:X63875) are under the control of ACTIN11. The genomic fragment containing 796 bp upstream of the ACTIN11 start codon was PCR amplified as the ACTIN11 promoter. Amplified products were digested with EcoRI and KpnI and introduced upstream of GFP or DsRed (Clonetech, Mountain View, CA, USA) followed by the Nos polyadenylation sequence in the modified binary vector 1302 as plasmid of p068 and p067.

The tobacco Ntrab5 and GNL1 coding region was PCR amplified from cDNA of tobacco SR1 anther. The signal anchor sequences of rat sialyl transferase (ST) were PCR amplified from plasmid ST-GFP [42]. The GNL1-GFP construct was generated by inserting the GNL1 coding region into p068. The Ntrab5-DsRed and ST-DsRed constructs were generated by inserting the GNL1 coding region and ST sequence into p067, respectively.

Expression vectors were transferred into tobacco pollen grains by particle bombardment with a helium-driven particle accelerator (PDS-1000/He; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using methods modified from Fu et al. [43]. Mature pollen grains were collected form N. tabacum SR1, then suspended in PGM. A drop of 80–100 ml medium containing pollen grains from three flowers was applied to a piece of cellulose nitrate film (Optitran BA-S 85 Reinforced NC; Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) placed on top of a piece of filter paper (Whatman, Florham Park, NJ, USA) in a Petri dish. Once liquid was drained from the membrane, an additional 1.5 ml PGM was added to the filter paper. Pollen grains were then immediately bombarded with DNA-coated gold particles using a PDS-1000/He particle delivery system (Bio-Rad). The microcarrier launch assembly was placed in the second slot from the top (level 2), and the target cells were placed at level 4 (the shortest distance from the stopping screen to the target cells). Rupture disks of 1,100 psi were chosen to accelerate macrocarriers under a vacuum of 28 inches of mercury. This was repeated three times for each Petri dish, and every firing required fresh plasmids. Gold particles (1.0 mm diameter) were coated with plasmid DNA according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bio-Rad) immediately before bombardment. Routinely, 1 mg particles were coated with 0.16 µg of pLAT52::ABD2 DNA. As control, the pLAT52 vector DNA was also bombarded. Bombarded pollen grains were incubated in a dark incubator for 30 min then washed into Petri dishes with 0.5 ml PGM. The pollen grains were left in the dark incubator for an additional 3–8 h before observation under an inverted microscope.

Label of Actin Fringe in Pollen Tubes

A method modified from Xiang et al. [44] was used in this experiment. The germinated pollen was fixed in fixation buffer (4% paraformaldehyde, 50 mM PIPES, and 10% sucrose, pH 6.9) with vacuum infiltration for the first 5 min and then kept in the fixation buffer for 1 h. The fixed material was then washed in PIPES buffer (50 mM, pH 6.9) three times, followed by incubating in buffer (50 mM PIPES, 10% sucrose, 1% DMSO, and 0.01% Nonidet P-40, pH 6.9) with 60 nM rhodamine phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h in the dark. The labeled pollen tubes were transferred onto a slide and visualized with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica SP2, Wetzlar, Germany).


Pollen tubes were placed onto cover slips for microscopy (DMIRE 2; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) using differential interference contrast (DIC). Images were taken with a cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (microMAX; Roper Scientific-Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ, USA) using MetaMorph software. Pollen tube growth video imaging at the tip was performed at 1-h intervals after pollen germination using MetaMorph time lapse to acquire tip videos for 2 min at 2-s intervals. Pollen tube germination percentages and mean tube lengths were determined using Image J software ( Loading of cells with FM4-64 dye in cover slips was generally achieved by application (at 4–8 mM) for 5 minutes after pollen tubes were cultured for 3 h. The pollen tubes were then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm to remove the dye and then transferred to slides.

Images were taken with a CCD or confocal microscope (Leica SP2).

Ultrastructural Sectioning (EM)

For the ultrastructural examination, pollen tubes were fixed with paraformaldehyde (2%) and glutaraldehyde (0.1%) on ice (4°C) in PIPES buffer (50 mM, pH 6.8) for 2 h after thorough rinsing with cold buffer, then dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, including a post-fixation step with OsO4 (0.25%) in 30% ethanol overnight at 4°C, embedded in Spurr's resin. Samples were then transferred to room temperature, and finally polymerized at 45°C for 48 h. Ultrathin sections were post-stained with uranyl acetate/lead citrate before observation by EM.


We would like to express our gratitude to Prof. Sheila McCormick and Prof. Alessandra Moscatelli for their useful comments on the work and thank Dr. Tingting Yan and Chun Gong for the excellent technical assistance with cell imaging using the confocal microscopy. Thanks to Prof. Shanjin Huang for Lat 52 promoter and Prof. Elison B. Blancaflor for ABD2-GFP plasmid.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by the fund of Key Basic Theory Research of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2007CB947600; 2007CB108700), NSFC (30821064,31000139) and the “111” project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Cheung AY. Pollen-pistil interactions during pollen tube growth. Trends Plant Sci. 1996;1:45–51.
2. Hepler PK, Vidali L, Cheung AY. Polarized cell growth in higher plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:159–187. [PubMed]
3. Parton RM, Fischer-Parton S, Watahiki MK, Trewavas AJ. Dynamics of the apical vesicle accumulation and the rate of growth are related in individual pollen tubes. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:2685–2695. [PubMed]
4. Wu G, Li H, Yang Z. Arabidopsis RopGAPs are a novel family of rho GTPase-activating proteins that require the Cdc42/Rac-interactive binding motif for rop-specific GTPase stimulation. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:1625–1636. [PubMed]
5. Franklin-Tong VE. The difficult question of sex: the mating game. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5:14–18. [PubMed]
6. Gu Y, Vernoud V, Fu Y, Yang Z. ROP GTPase regulation of pollen tube growth through the dynamics of tip-localized F-actin. J Exp Bot. 2003;54:93–101. [PubMed]
7. Cardenas L, Lovy-Wheeler A, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK. Pollen tube growth oscillations and intracellular calcium levels are reversibly modulated by actin polymerization. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:1611–1621. [PubMed]
8. Rockel N, Wolf S, Kost B, Rausch T, Greiner S. Elaborate spatial patterning of cell-wall PME and PMEI at the pollen tube tip involves PMEI endocytosis, and reflects the distribution ofesterified and de-esterified pectins. Plant J. 2008;53:133–143. [PubMed]
9. Zonia L, Munnik T. Vesicle trafficking dynamics and visualization of zones of exocytosis and endocytosis in tobacco pollen tubes. J Exp Bot. 2008;59:861–873. [PubMed]
10. Campanoni P, Blatt MR. Membrane trafficking and polar growth in root hairs and pollen tubes. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:65–74. [PubMed]
11. Bove J, Vaillancourt B, Kroeger J, Hepler PK, Wiseman PW, et al. Magnitude and direction of vesicle dynamics in growing pollen tubes using spatiotemporal image correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:1646–1658. [PubMed]
12. Galway ME, Rennie PJ, Fowke LC. Ultrastructure of the endocytotic pathway in glutaraldehyde-fixed and high-pressure frozen/freeze-substituted protoplasts of white spruce (Picea glauca). J Cell Sci. 1993;106:847–858. [PubMed]
13. Baba M, Osumi M, Scott SV, Klionsky DJ, Ohsumi Y. Two distinct pathways for targeting proteins from the cytoplasm to the vacuole/lysosome. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:1687–1695. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Tse YC, Mo B, Hillmer S, Zhao M, Lo SW, et al. Identification of multivesicular bodies as prevacuolar compartments in Nicotiana tabacum BY-2 cells. Plant Cell. 2004;16:672–693. [PubMed]
15. Vida TA, Emr SD. A new vital stain for visualizing vacuolar membrane dynamics and endocytosis in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:779–792. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Tanaka H, Kitakura S, De Rycke R, De Groodt R, Friml J. Fluorescence imaging-based screen identifies ARF GEF component of early endosomal trafficking. Curr Biol. 2009;19:391–397. [PubMed]
17. Parton RM, Fischer-Parton S, Trewavas AJ, Watahiki MK. Pollen tubes exhibit regular periodic membrane trafficking events in the absence of apical extension. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2707–2719. [PubMed]
18. Wang Q, Kong L, Hao H, Wang X, Lin J, et al. Effects of brefeldin A on pollen germination and tube growth: antagonistic effects on endocytosis and secretion. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:1692–1703. [PubMed]
19. Chen T, Teng N, Wu X, Wang Y, Tang W, et al. Disruption of actin filaments by latrunculin B affects cell wall construction in Picea meyeri pollen tube by disturbing vesicle trafficking. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:19–30. [PubMed]
20. Lam SK, Tse YC, Robinson DG, Jiang L. Tracking down the elusive early endosome. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12:497–505. [PubMed]
21. Hanton SL, Matheson LA, Chatre L, Rossi M, Brandizzi F. Post-Golgi protein traffic in the plant secretory pathway. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26:1431–1438. [PubMed]
22. Anders N, Jurgens G. Large ARF guanine nucleotide exchange factors in membrane trafficking. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:3433–3445. [PubMed]
23. Xu J, Scheres B. Dissection of Arabidopsis ADP-RIBOSYLATION FACTOR 1 function in epidermal cell polarity. Plant Cell. 2005;17:525–536. [PubMed]
24. Geldner N, Anders N, Wolters H, Keicher J, Kornberger W, et al. The Arabidopsis GNOM ARF-GEF mediates endosomal recycling, auxin transport, and auxin-dependent plant growth. Cell. 2003;112:219–230. [PubMed]
25. Mayer U, Buttner G, Jurgens G. Apical-basal pattern formation in the Arabidopsis embryo: studies on the role of the gnom gene. Development. 1993;117:149–162.
26. Geldner N, Richter S, Vieten A, Marquardt S, Torres-Ruiz RA, et al. Partial loss-of-function alleles reveal a role for GNOM in auxin transport-related, post-embryonic development of Arabidopsis. Development. 2004;131:389–400. [PubMed]
27. Geldner N, Friml J, Stierhof YD, Jurgens G, Palme K. Auxin transport inhibitors block PIN1 cycling and vesicle trafficking. Nature. 2001;413:425–428. [PubMed]
28. Kleine-Vehn J, Dhonukshe P, Sauer M, Brewer PB, Wisniewska J, et al. ARF GEF-dependent transcytosis and polar delivery of PIN auxin carriers in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2008;18:526–531. [PubMed]
29. Richter SGN, Schrader J, Wolters H, Stierhof YD, Rios G, et al. Functional diversification of closely related ARF-GEFs in protein secretion and recycling. Nature. 2007;448:488–492. [PubMed]
30. Teh OK, Moore I. An ARF-GEF acting at the Golgi and in selective endocytosis in polarized plant cells. Nature. 2007;448:493–496. [PubMed]
31. Wang L, Liao FL, Zhu L, Peng XB, Sun MX. NtGNL1 is involved in embryonic cell division patterning, root elongation, and pollen tube growth in tobacco. New Phytol. 2008;179:81–93. [PubMed]
32. Steinmann T, Geldner N, Grebe M, Mangold S, Jackson CL, et al. Coordinated polar localization of auxin efflux carrier PIN1 by GNOM ARF GEF. Science. 1999;286:316–318. [PubMed]
33. Niu TK, Pfeifer AC, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Jackson CL. Dynamics of GBF1, a Brefeldin A-sensitive Arf1 exchange factor at the Golgi. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1213–1222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Anders N, Nielsen M, Keicher J, Stierhof YD, Furutani M, et al. Membrane association of the Arabidopsis ARF exchange factor GNOM involves interaction of conserved domains. Plant Cell. 2008;20:142–151. [PubMed]
35. Lowe SL, Wong SH, Hong W. The mammalian ARF-like protein 1 (Arl1) is associated with the Golgi complex. J Cell Sci. 1996;109:209–220. [PubMed]
36. Ritzenthaler C, Nebenfuhr A, Movafeghi A, Stussi-Garaud C, Behnia L, et al. Reevaluation of the effects of brefeldin A on plant cells using tobacco Bright Yellow 2 cells expressing Golgi-targeted green fluorescent protein and COPI antisera. Plant Cell. 2002;14:237–261. [PubMed]
37. Tse YC, Lo SW, Hillmer S, Dupree P, Jiang L. Dynamic response of prevacuolar compartments to brefeldin a in plant cells. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:1442–1459. [PubMed]
38. Moscatelli A, Ciampolini F, Rodighiero S, Onelli E, Cresti M, et al. Distinct endocytic pathways identified in tobacco pollen tubes using charged nanogold. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:3804–3819. [PubMed]
39. Nakano RT, Matsushima R, Ueda H, Tamura K, Shimada T, et al. Gnom-like1/ermo1 and sec24a/ermo2 are required for maintenance of endoplasmic reticulum morphology in arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2009;21:3672–3685. [PubMed]
40. Sun MX, Moscatelli A, Yang HY, Cresti M. In vitro double fertilization in Nicotiana tabacum (L): fusion behavior and gamete interaction traced by video-enhanced microscopy. Sex Plant Reprod. 2000;12:267–275.
41. Twell D, Yamaguchi J, McCormick S. Pollen-specific gene expression in transgenic plants: Coordinate regulation of two different tomato gene promoters during microsporogenesis. Development. 1990;109:705–713. [PubMed]
42. Saint-Jore CM, Evins J, Batoko H, Brandizzi F, Moore I, et al. Redistribution of membrane proteins between the Golgi apparatus and the endoplasmic reticulum in plants is reversible and not dependent on cytoskeleton networks. Plant J. 2002;29:661–679. [PubMed]
43. Fu Y, Wu G, Yang Z. Rop GTPase-dependent dynamics of tip-localized F-actin controls tip growth in pollen tubes. J Cell Biol. 2001;152:1019–1032. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Xiang Y, Huang X, Wang T, Zhang Y, Liu Q, et al. ACTIN BINDING PROTEIN 29 from Lilium pollen plays an important role in dynamic actin remodeling. Plant Cell. 2007;19:1930–1946. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science