PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of thijTexas Heart Institute JournalSee also Cardiovascular Diseases Journal in PMCSubscribeSubmissionsTHI Journal Website
 
Tex Heart Inst J. 2010; 37(5): 574–575.
PMCID: PMC2953237
WEBSITE FEATURE

Pericardial Tamponade and Right-to-Left Shunt through Patent Foramen Ovale after Epicardial Pacing-Wire Removal

Abstract

After cardiac operations, careful management substantially reduces the risks of negative complications during or after the removal of temporary epicardial pacing wires. Herein, we report the case of a 58-year-old man who, 4 days after undergoing aortic root replacement, developed pericardial tamponade after the removal of temporary epicardial pacing wires. Consequent to the tamponade, a right-to-left shunt developed through a previously undiagnosed patent foramen ovale. The patient underwent emergency surgery to repair myocardium that had ruptured due to the removal of the wires, and he recovered uneventfully.

Key words: Cardiac pacing, artificial/adverse effects; cardiac surgical procedures; cardiac tamponade/etiology; echocardiography, transesophageal; heart injuries/etiology; heart septal defects, atrial; pacemaker, artificial; postoperative care, adverse effects; postoperative complications/etiology; treatment outcome

Temporary epicardial pacemakers are frequently implanted in cardiac surgical patients before chest closure, with acceptable safety rates. However, complications can occur during routine procedures and early and late after surgery, due not only to migration of the epicardial pacing wires but also to their insertion and removal.1

Herein, we report a rare case of pericardial tamponade and a right-to-left shunt through a previously undiscovered patent foramen ovale (PFO); the tamponade occurred after the removal of epicardial pacing wires.

Case Report

In 2008, a 58-year-old man presented at our hospital with severe aortic regurgitation and aneurysmal dilation of the ascending aorta. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed a bicuspid aortic valve with severe regurgitation and mild stenosis. The ascending aorta above the sinus of Valsalva was dilated to 6.1 cm. The patient underwent aortic root replacement with valve preservation (the David procedure). After an uneventful cardiac operation and before chest closure, 2 epicardial pacing wires were placed on the right ventricle (RV). The patient was transferred to the surgical intensive care unit and later to the ward; all the while, he was in sinus rhythm and had an acceptable hemodynamic status. On the 4th postoperative day, the pacing wires were removed. The patient immediately became cyanotic and fainted. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed pericardial tamponade (Fig. 1) and a right-to-left shunt through a previously undiagnosed PFO (Fig. 2). The tamponade compressed the right atrium and the RV, severely restricting the passage of blood through the tricuspid valve. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography revealed increased right atrial pressure and a mean pressure gradient of about 12 mmHg between the right atrium and the RV that mimicked tricuspid stenosis. The patient was urgently taken to the operating room. The source of bleeding was determined to be a myocardial rupture caused by removal of the epicardial pacing wires. The myocardium was repaired, and the patient experienced an uneventful postoperative recovery. As of his last follow-up visit, he had experienced no further problems.

figure 15FF1
Fig. 1 Transesophageal echocardiogram shows blood compressing the right atrium (RA) and the right ventricle (RV).
figure 15FF2
Fig. 2 Color-flow transesophageal echocardiogram shows restricted blood passage through the tricuspid valve (TV) and the patent foramen ovale (PFO).

Discussion

Epicardial pacing is regularly used to identify and control dysrhythmias after cardiac operations and to ensure patients' hemodynamic status.2 However, the implantation of temporary epicardial pacemakers during cardiac operations is not free from risk.3,4 Indeed, a complication rate of 0.09% has been reported.4 Removal of the temporary wires is believed to trigger ventricular dysrhythmias3; therefore, when removal entails considerable risk, the physician may opt to leave the pacing wires in place.5 However, Meier and colleagues1 reported a case of an epicardial pacing wire that migrated into a patient's RV and pulmonary artery 3 years after insertion, leading to ventricular tachycardia. The incidence rate of pericardial tamponade after epicardial pacing-wire removal has not been reported.

Documented complications of pacing-wire insertion and removal include cardiac arrest, tamponade, hemothorax, pneumothorax, vascular injury or rupture, hemoptysis, and infections during standard procedures.1 Right ventricular rupture and pericardial tamponade have also occurred upon the insertion of epicardial pacing wires.4 Akowuah and colleagues6 reported a case of subepicardial hematoma that compressed the RV as a result of bleeding that was caused by the insertion of pacing wires.

Our patient's case is noteworthy in that the pericardial tamponade and the increased right atrial pressure resulted in blood flow through the PFO. A 1984 study of autopsy cases revealed an incidence of 27.3% of patent PFO.7 Contrast echocardiography and the Valsalva maneuver are frequently used to identify PFO. In association with the Valsalva maneuver, TEE has been shown to have a higher sensitivity in detecting PFO than has TTE.8 Because we did not perform a Valsalva maneuver or a contrast study specific for the evaluation of PFO, we cannot rule out the presence of the PFO in our patient before surgery. Accordingly, it is possible that the bleeding and the increased right atrial pressure revealed an existing PFO.

Pericardial tamponade is a grave (albeit rare) complication that can occur during the removal of temporary epicardial pacing wires. Such cases require timely diagnosis and intervention to avert catastrophic consequences. In addition, complications might be prevented by the careful insertion and gentle removal of the temporary wires. After the wires are removed, the patient's discharge from the hospital is best delayed for several hours or overnight due to the risk of cardiac tamponade, and electrocardiography should be used to monitor the occurrence of dysrhythmias.

Supplementary Material

Video for Fig. 2:

Footnotes

Address for reprints: Bahare Saidi, MD, Department of Cardiology Echocardiography, Day General Hospital, Tavanir St., Vali-ye-Asr Ave., 1434873111 Tehran, Iran

E-mail: moc.oohay@idias;f5000x#&erahab

References

1. Meier DJ, Tamirisa KP, Eitzman DT. Ventricular tachycardia associated with transmyocardial migration of an epicardial pacing wire. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77(3):1077–9. [PubMed]
2. Broka SM, Ducart AR, Collard EL, Eucher PM, Jamart J, Delire VR, et al. Hemodynamic benefit of optimizing atrioventricular delay after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11(6):723–8. [PubMed]
3. Carroll KC, Reeves LM, Andersen G, Ray FM, Clopton PL, Shively M, Tarazi RY. Risks associated with removal of ventricular epicardial pacing wires after cardiac surgery. Am J Crit Care 1998;7(6):444–9. [PubMed]
4. Del Nido P, Goldman BS. Temporary epicardial pacing after open heart surgery: complications and prevention. J Card Surg 1989;4(1):99–103. [PubMed]
5. Horng GS, Ashley E, Balsam L, Reitz B, Zamanian RT. Progressive dyspnea after CABG: complication of retained epicardial pacing wires. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86(4):1352–4. [PubMed]
6. Akowuah EF, Rajnish R, Tomkins S, Hutter J. Pseudo cardiac tamponade: a rare complication of temporary epicardial pacing wires. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33(4):738. [PubMed]
7. Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 1984;59 (1):17–20. [PubMed]
8. Hausmann D, Mugge A, Becht I, Daniel WG. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and association with cerebral and peripheral embolic events. Am J Cardiol 1992;70(6):668–72. [PubMed]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute