Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of ijpsychHomeCurrent issueInstructionsSubmit article
Indian J Psychiatry. 2003 Oct-Dec; 45(4): 239–243.
PMCID: PMC2952371

Fidelity of ECT Devices : An alert to Clinicians


In India, the fidelity of electro convulsive therapy (ECT) devices is not regulated by any statutory body; as a result, it is conceivable that marketed devices may not meet the highest standards of quality. We therefore subjected 4 ECT devices, obtained from 4 different manufacturers, to quality testing in a biomedical engineering laboratory. The newest device was one month old, and the oldest device was 13 years old. Two devices were in regular use, and two were standby instruments, We found that not a single device was working in accordance with the manufacturer′s specifications. One device was not working at all; one was delivering varying intensity, uninterrupted current rather than constant current brief pulses (whatever the settings applied); one was delivering blocks of pulses the description of which was enormously at variance with the instrument settings; and one device, the best of the four, was delivering brief-pulses with small errors in each setting that cumulated to an error of 49.3% at a common charge setting for clinical ECT. We conclude that clinicians must test the fidelity of their ECT devices at the time of purchase as well as at frequent intervals thereafter. Finally, the fidelity of ECT devices should be regulated by an appropriate statutory body in India

Keywords: Electrocovulsive therapy, ETC device, medical electronics

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (273K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Feigal David W, Gardner Susan N, McClellan Mark. Ensuring safe and effective medical devices. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 16;348(3):191–192. [PubMed]
  • Girish K, Mayur PM, Saravanan ES, Janakiramaiah N, Gangadhar BN, Subbakrishna DK, Rao GS. Seizure threshold estimation by formula method: a prospective study in unilateral ECT. J ECT. 2000 Sep;16(3):258–262. [PubMed]
  • Gordon D. Electro-convulsive therapy with minimum hazard. Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;141:12–18. [PubMed]
  • Petrides G, Fink M. The "half-age" stimulation strategy for ECT dosing. Convuls Ther. 1996 Sep;12(3):138–146. [PubMed]
  • Railton R, Fisher J, Sinclair A, Shrigmankar JM. Comparison of electrical measurements on constant voltage and constant current ECT machines. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Aug;151:244–247. [PubMed]
  • Sackeim HA, Decina P, Portnoy S, Neeley P, Malitz S. Studies of dosage, seizure threshold, and seizure duration in ECT. Biol Psychiatry. 1987 Mar;22(3):249–268. [PubMed]
  • Sackeim HA, Devanand DP, Prudic J. Stimulus intensity, seizure threshold, and seizure duration: impact on the efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1991 Dec;14(4):803–843. [PubMed]
  • Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Devanand DP, Kiersky JE, Fitzsimons L, Moody BJ, McElhiney MC, Coleman EA, Settembrino JM. Effects of stimulus intensity and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 25;328(12):839–846. [PubMed]
  • Sackeim HA, Long J, Luber B, Moeller JR, Prohovnik I, Devanand DP, Nobler MS. Physical properties and quantification of the ECT stimulus: I. Basic principles. Convuls Ther. 1994 Jun;10(2):93–123. [PubMed]
  • Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Devanand DP, Nobler MS, Lisanby SH, Peyser S, Fitzsimons L, Moody BJ, Clark J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 May;57(5):425–434. [PubMed]

Articles from Indian Journal of Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Medknow Publications