PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Opt Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 9.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2952183
NIHMSID: NIHMS239102

Subwavelength-resolution label-free photoacoustic microscopy of optical absorption in vivo

Abstract

Optical absorption provides essential biological functional information but cannot be sensed by mainstream optical microscopy technologies directly, which detect fluorescence or scattering and may require undesirable labeling. Here we developed in vivo subwavelength-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (SW-PAM) that provides exquisitely high optical-absorption contrast due to nonfluorescent, or fluorescent, endogenous pigments. Having approached the ultimate diffraction-limited optical resolution, SW-PAM can resolve subcellular organelles. Vasculature and early-stage melanoma were imaged with 12:1 and 17:1 contrasts, respectively, without labeling. SW-PAM along with the scaled-up macroscopy, as the only technology that measures the same contrast origin over such a wide length scale, can potentially accelerate translation from microscopic research to clinical practice.

Photoacoustic imaging [1,2] is an emerging biomedical imaging technology that utilizes the photoacoustic effect—absorbed light is converted to heat, subsequently inducing acoustic waves. If an optical objective is used to focus light into the biological tissue, and an ultrasonic transducer is focused on the same area to receive the photoacoustic signals, a high-resolution image of the tissue can be obtained. This approach, referred to as photoacoustic microscopy (PAM), has been successfully applied to in vivo structural, functional, and molecular imaging [3-6].

PAM differs from other forms of optical microscopy (OM) in contrast mechanisms. The confocal structure of PAM is similar to that of confocal optical microscopy, but PAM uses an ultrasonic transducer to detect the photoacoustic waves. In biological tissues, photons may be elastically scattered, inelastically scattered (converted to fluorescence or Raman signals), or absorbed [7]. Elastic-scattering OM—such as confocal microscopy or optical coherence tomography—detects the backscattered photons and therefore images scattering contrast. Fluorescence OM—such as confocal microscopy or two-photon microscopy—detects inelastically scattered photons from samples, normally labeled by exogenous fluorescent markers, so the contrast is sensitive to the concentration of fluorophores and the fluorescence quantum yield. However, most endogenous pigments have extremely weak fluorescence, where most absorbed energy is converted to heat. By contrast, PAM is sensitive to optical absorption with a relative sensitivity of 100% due to background-free detection [8].

PAM holds great potential for label-free imaging of melanoma and vasculature because nonfluorescent melanin and hemoglobin are major sources of endogenous absorption in biological tissue in the visible and near-infrared spectral range. Melanoma, arising from melanocytes, is the most deadly skin cancer [9]. The diagnosis of melanoma is based on inaccurate visual inspection and invasive biopsy. By providing in vivo, noninvasive, and high-resolution imaging, PAM promises to diagnose melanoma in the early stage, which is the key to successful treatment. Moreover, as a hall mark of cancer, tumor angiogenesis is currently imaged either ex vivo by microscopic methods at high resolution or in vivo by clinical methods at low resolution [10]. With high endogenous contrast, PAM can identify angiogenic vessels in vivo.

In optical-resolution PAM, the numerical aperture (NA) of the optical objective is the key—the tighter the optical focus, the finer the image resolution. The first optical-resolution PAM system reached a resolution of 5 μm [4]. Here, by using a water-immersion optical objective with a 1.23 NA, which is close to the ultimate limit, we have finally approached the highest diffraction-limited optical resolution and achieved subwavelength-resolution PAM (SW-PAM)—220 nm resolution at 532 nm wavelength—as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
Subwavelength-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (SW-PAM). (a) Schematic diagram. (b) Close-up diagram showing the confocal structure of the optical objective and the ultrasonic transducer. (c) Point spread function of the system to measure the transverse ...

In SW-PAM, a Nd:YVO4 laser generated pulses with a 532 nm wavelength (λ) and a 1.5 ns duration. The pulses were coupled to a single-mode optical fiber, which was connected to the optical objective with a 1.23 NA. The sample was irradiated by the laser pulse focused by the objective, and the ultrasonic transducer (with a central frequency of 40 MHz and a numerical aperture of 0.5) detected the resulting time-resolved photoacoustic wave in transmission mode. The typical pulse energy was 10 nJ for slide samples and 60 nJ for mouse ears. The signals were then amplified and digitized at a sampling rate of 1 GHz. The objective and the transducer mechanically scanned in raster mode in the x-y plane with a scanning speed of 2 mm/s and a step size of 125 nm, which was controlled by a separate computer. After scanning, a maximum-amplitude projection (MAP) image was obtained by projecting the maximum amplitude of each time-resolved signal onto the x-y scanning plane.

In order to measure the transverse spatial resolution of SW-PAM, gold nanospheres with a diameter of 15 nm were imaged. A typical sphere was chosen, and the averaged pixel value was calculated with respect to the distance from the sphere center [Fig. 1(c)]. Then the data was fitted by the theoretical Bessel-form function. The system resolution, given by the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the Bessel-form point spread function, is 220 ± 20 nm, agreeing well with the theoretical value 0.51λ/NA ≈ 221 nm.

To validate SW-PAM with wide-field OM, we imaged ex vivo melanoma cells and red blood cells. The PAM images have a dark background while the OM images have a bright background. The bright (white) dots in the PAM image of melanoma cells are melanosomes—organelles containing melanin [Fig. 2(a), left]. However, the melanosomes appear dark in the OM image [Fig. 2(a), middle] because their absorption attenuated the light transmission. The contrast between melanosomes and other areas in the PAM image [(54.5±0.4):1] is much higher than that in the OM image [(0.79±0.04):1] because PAM is sensitive to only absorption, but OM shows both absorption and scattering (the latter is relatively close between melanosomes and other areas). The average contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for melanosomes are 49 dB and 25 dB in the PAM and OM images, respectively. The holes with few white dots inside the cells (PAM image) are nuclei, which is proved by staining them with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and taking a fluorescence OM image [Fig. 2(a), right]. The nuclei are difficult to identify in the OM image due to the low contrast. Here the melanoma cells have irregular shapes because they were grown on glass. For typical red blood cells [Fig. 2(b)], the contrast disparity between PAM and OM can also be observed, although we could not find the same cells under the two microscopes.

Fig. 2
Ex vivo images of cells. (a) Melanoma cells grown on a cover glass and fixed. From left to right: photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) image, optical microscopy (OM) image (0.55 NA), and a composite of the PAM image and the fluorescence OM image of the stained ...

Then we imaged mouse ears in vivo with SW-PAM. All experimental animal procedures were carried out in conformity with the laboratory animal protocol approved by the Animal Studies Committee of Washington University in St. Louis. The melanin distribution in the ear (depilated) of a black mouse (Harlan Co., C57BL/6NHsd, 25 g, male) is shown in Fig. 3. Melanin synthesis occurs in melanosomes of melanocytes, and most melanocytes reside in the basal layer of the epidermis, whose thickness is about 10 μm in this case [11]. Thus, we acquired two images focusing at ~10 μm and ~30 μm deep, respectively. In the shallower layer [Fig. 3(a)], the single melanosomes can be clearly identified. In the deeper layer [Fig. 3(b)], most melanosomes are out of focus but more skin structures are shown, such as the sebaceous glands. Within this depth range we did not find an obvious decrease in resolution due to scattering. The signals from the deeper layer are weaker, but Fig. 3(b) appears to have higher contrast since it is scaled to the full color range. The OM image of the ear, although not shown here, has extremely low contrast. These results suggest potential applications of PAM in quantifying melanin distribution in vivo, which is important for detecting melanoma as well as determining individualized radiant exposure in dermatological laser therapies [12].

Fig. 3
PAM images of a black mouse ear, showing the distribution of melanin. (a) Image focusing at ~10 μm deep (the close-up image indicates melanosomes). (b) Image focusing at ~30 μm deep. SG: sebaceous gland.

The ear of a nude mouse (Harlan Co., Hsd:Athymic Nude-Foxn1nu, 30 g, male) was also imaged in vivo. Here, we used an objective with a 0.60 NA (providing 400 nm resolution) instead because the thick layer of vessels required an extended focal zone. Since nude mice do not have much melanin in their skin, all the blood vessels, including capillaries, are shown with little background signals [Fig. 4(a)]. In some areas, we can see motionless red blood cells with the characteristic donut shape [Fig. 4(b)]. Because individual red blood cells can be imaged in vivo, SW-PAM can potentially be used to count red blood cells as an in vivo flow cytometer, measure blood flow velocity in capillaries, and monitor sickle cell disease. The same ear was imaged again, as shown in Fig. 4(c), 4 days after inoculation with 10 μl of suspension containing 1 million B16 melanoma cells. The melanoma generated stronger photoacoustic signals than the vessels and was easily identified. The vasculature and melanoma have contrasts of (12±1):1 (33 dB CNR) and (17±1):1 (36 dB CNR), respectively. If the laser wavelength is changed to, for example, 650 nm, we can further increase the contrast difference between vasculature and melanoma. In the wide-field OM image [Fig. 4(d)], the melanoma is obscure, with a contrast of (0.27±0.02):1 (21 dB CNR). Therefore, PAM has superior potential to detect melanoma in the early stage.

Fig. 4
Monitoring of melanoma growing on a nude mouse ear. (a) PAM image of blood vessels in the ear acquired before injection of melanoma cells. (b) PAM image where in vivo red blood cells (RBCs) can be identified (the close-up image indicates the biconcave ...

As shown by the results in Figs. Figs.22--4,4, SW-PAM can resolve structures as small as subcellular organelles for both ex vivo and in vivo imaging. Additionally, by simply replacing the optical objective, our system can work with scalable imaging resolutions. Since the thickness of tissues that can be imaged is limited by the transmission-mode configuration, we are extending SW-PAM to reflection mode for applications in more anatomical sites. As a result, SW-PAM along with the scaled-up macroscopy—deep-penetrating photoacoustic tomography [13,14]—may bridge microscopic research and clinical practice, especially for melanoma detection, vasculature visualization, reporter gene imaging [15], and sentinel lymph node mapping [16].

SW-PAM provides depth information based on the arrival time of photoacoustic signals. However, since we used a high-NA optical objective, the length of the optical focal zone is much smaller than that of the acoustic focal zone. To maintain high transverse resolution over a large depth range, we added z-scanning in the design [Fig. 1(a)]. With z-scanning, we can focus on different regions of interest, obtain two-dimensional images of those regions by selecting signals according to arrival times (see Fig. 3), and use the two-dimensional sections to form a three-dimensional view. Although the total scanning time will increase, high speed imaging can be achieved by replacing the mechanical scanning with laser scanning. These improvements may lead to more applications in the near future.

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Li and Y. Wang for experimental assistance and helpful discussion, Y. Zhang for fixing and staining melanoma cells, D. Yao for help with optical microscopy, and M. Yang for preparing gold nanospheres. This work was sponsored in part by National Institutes of Health grants R01 EB000712, R01 EB008085, R01 CA113453901, U54 CA136398, and 5P60 DK02057933. L.W. has a financial interest in Microphotoacoustics, Inc. and Endra, Inc., which, however, did not support this work.

Footnotes

OCIS codes: 170.3880, 170.5120, 180.5810.

References

1. Wang LV. Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. Nature Photon. 2009;3:503–509. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Li C, Wang LV. Photoacoustic tomography and sensing in biomedicine. Phys. Med. Biol. 2009;54:R59–R97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Zhang HF, Maslov K, Stoica G, Wang LV. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nature Biotechnol. 2006;24:848–851. [PubMed]
4. Maslov K, Zhang HF, Hu S, Wang LV. Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo imaging of single capillaries. Opt. Lett. 2008;33:929–931. [PubMed]
5. Laufer J, Zhang E, Raivich G, Beard P. Three-dimensional noninvasive imaging of the vasculature in the mouse brain using a high resolution photoacoustic scanner. Appl. Opt. 2009;48:299–306. [PubMed]
6. Kim C, Favazza C, Wang LV. In vivo photoacoustic tomography of chemicals: high-resolution functional and molecular optical imaging at new depths. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:2756–2782. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Wang LV, Wu H. Biomedical Optics: Principles and Imaging. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ: 2007.
8. Wang LV. Tutorial on photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 2008;14:171–179.
9. Gray-Schopher V, Wellbrock C, Marais R. Melanoma biology and new targeted therapy. Nature. 2007;445:851–857. [PubMed]
10. McDonald DM, Choyke PL. Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic. Nature Med. 2003;9:713–725. [PubMed]
11. Kietzmann K, Lubach D, Heeren H-J. The mouse epidermis as a model in skin pharmacology: influence of age and sex on epidermal metabolic reactions and their circadian rhythms. Lab. Animal. 1990;24:321–327. [PubMed]
12. Verkruysse W, Svaasand LO, Franco W. Remittance at a single wavelength of 390 nm to quantify epidermal melanin concentration. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009;14:014005. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Wang X, Pang Y, Ku G, Xie X, Stoica G, Wang LV. Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain. Nature Biotechnol. 2003;21:803–806. [PubMed]
14. Fronheiser MP, Ermilov SA, Brecht H, Conjusteau A, Su R, Mehta K, Oraevsky AA. Real-time optoacoustic monitoring and three-dimensional mapping of a human arm vasculature. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15:021305. [PubMed]
15. Li L, Zemp RJ, Lungu G, Stoica G, Wang LV. Photoacoustic imaging of lacZ gene expression in vivo. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007;12:020504. [PubMed]
16. Song KH, Stein EW, Margenthaler JA, Wang LV. Noninvasive photoacoustic identification of sentinel lymph nodes containing methylene blue in vivo in a rat model. J. Biomed. Opt. 2008;13:054033. [PMC free article] [PubMed]